Janssen Highlights Innovative Oncology Portfolio and Pipeline of Oral, Biologic and Cell Therapies Through ASCO20 Virtual Scientific Program

On May 29, 2020 The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson reported the latest research from its innovative oncology portfolio and pipeline of novel oral, biologic and cell therapies is now available as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Virtual Scientific Program (Press release, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, MAY 29, 2020, View Source [SID1234558762]). Among the data presented are longer-term results from the JNJ-4528 BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy Phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM); results from the ERLEADA (apalutamide) Phase 3 SPARTAN study reporting overall survival (OS) in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC); and initial results from Phase 1 studies of amivantamab (EGFRxMET bispecific antibody) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); and teclistamab (BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibody) in RRMM. Further information about these studies and the science that Janssen is championing for patients is available via the Janssen Oncology Virtual Newsroom.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Through our discovery, development and collaborative efforts, we continue to advance a deep, differentiated portfolio and pipeline of small molecules, biologics and cell therapies for patients with hematologic malignancies, prostate cancer, lung cancer and bladder cancer," said Peter Lebowitz, M.D., Ph.D., Global Therapeutic Area Head, Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC. "We’re proud to have achieved nine oncology drug approvals since 2011, 10 Breakthrough Therapy Designations and to be advancing six novel bispecific antibodies in the clinic. Our strategy is rooted in a deep understanding of disease, a scientific approach to transformational regimens and a movement towards cancer interception as we aim to realize our vision of the elimination of cancer."

Key Janssen Data Presentations Include:

Longer-Term Follow-Up Data for BCMA-Targeted CAR-T Therapy JNJ-4528 Show Early, Deep and Durable Responses in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Multiple Myeloma
An oral presentation of updated results from the Phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study of JNJ-4528 in patients with RRMM (Abstract #8505).

Final Analysis of Phase 3 SPARTAN Study Marks Second ERLEADA Phase 3 Registrational Study to Show Overall Survival Benefit
The pre-planned final analysis demonstrating OS results from the Phase 3 SPARTAN study evaluating ERLEADA in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with nmCRPC who are at high risk of metastases (Abstract #5516).

Amivantamab Data in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Exon 20 Insertion Mutations
Results from the Phase 1 CHRYSALIS study of amivantamab in patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations (Abstract #9512), which served as the basis of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Breakthrough Therapy Designation as announced in March.

First Data from Phase 1 Study of BCMAxCD3 Bispecific Teclistamab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
An oral presentation of the first data from the Phase 1 study of teclistamab (Abstract #100), an investigational bispecific antibody targeting both BCMA and CD3 receptors on T-cells, in the treatment of patients with RRMM.

Data for IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib), recently approved for a subsequent chronic lymphocytic leukemia indication, and DARZALEX FASPROTM (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj), a new subcutaneous formulation recently approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma, will also be presented during the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Virtual Scientific Program.

All Janssen-sponsored abstracts presented are listed below and abstracts presented for ZYTIGA (abiraterone acetate) are available through the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) abstract database here.

Abstract No.

Title

Portfolio Products

ERLEADA (apalutamide)

Poster Discussion

Abstract #5516

Final Survival Results From SPARTAN, a Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide vs Placebo in Patients with nmCRPC

Poster Presentations

Abstract #5535

Molecular Determinants of Outcome for mCSPC with Addition of Apalutamide or Placebo to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in TITAN

Abstract #5541

PSA Kinetics in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide: Results from the TITAN and SPARTAN Studies

Abstract #5521

Molecular Determinants of PSA Kinetics and Clinical Response to Apalutamide in Patients with nmCRPC in SPARTAN

DARZALEX (daratumumab) and DARZALEX FASPRO (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj)

Poster Presentations

Abstract #8537

Corticosteroid Tapering in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Receiving Subcutaneous Daratumumab: Part 3 of the Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 1b PAVO Study

Abstract #8538

Daratumumab + Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VTd) in Transplant-eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Baseline slimCRAB-based Subgroup Analysis of CASSIOPEIA

Abstract #TPS8553

Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Have Been Previously Treated with Intravenous Daratumumab: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Study (LYNX)

Abstract #8526

Efficacy and Safety of Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, Daratumumab (DKd) Twice-Weekly at 56 mg/m2 and Once-Weekly at 70 mg/m2 in RRMM: Cross-Study Comparison of CANDOR and MY1001*

Publication

Abstract #e20563

Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Outcomes from the Phase 3 CANDOR Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab (DKd) to Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone (Kd) in Patients with RRMM*

IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib)

Poster Presentation

Abstract #8036

Clinical Activity of Cirmtuzumab, an Anti-ROR1 Antibody, in Combination with Ibrutinib; Interim Results of a Phase 1b/2 Study in MCL or CLL**

Publications

Abstract #e20004

Toxicity Burden in Older Patients with CLL Receiving Bendamustine with Rituximab (BR) or Ibrutinib Regimens: Alliance A041202**

Abstract #e19354

Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU)/Costs associated with Venetoclax Treatment among CLL/SLL Patients

Abstract #e19408

Real-world HRU and Costs among Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Receiving Ibrutinib or Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)

BALVERSA (erdafitinib)

Poster Discussion

Abstract #5015

BLC2001 Erdafitinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC): Long-Term Outcomes in BLC2001

Poster Presentations

Abstract #5026

Clinical Outcomes and Economic Burden for Bladder Cancer Patients: An Analysis from a Swedish Cancer Registry

Abstract #3055

Evolving Development of PD-1 Therapy: Cetrelimab (JNJ-63723283) from Monotherapy to Combination with Erdafitinib

Publication

Abstract #e19144

Use of a Dynamic Disease Progression Model to Estimate Prevalence and Prognosis for Patients with UC in the U.S.

Late-Stage Pipeline

JNJ-4528

Oral Presentation

Abstract #8505

Update of CARTITUDE-1: A Phase 1B/2 Study of JNJ-4528, a BCMA-Directed CAR-T Cell Therapy, in RRMM

Publication

Abstract #e20539

Medical Resource Utilization Among Multiple Myeloma Patients who were Triple-exposed to a Proteasome Inhibitor, an Immunomodulatory Agent, and Daratumumab

Abstract #e20540

Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns in RRMM Patients After Exposure to a Proteasome Inhibitor, an Immunomodulatory Agent and Daratumumab

Abstract #e20543

Treatment Patterns in Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Experience of the Triple Class Exposed Patient

Amivantamab

Poster Presentation

Abstract #9512

Amivantamab, an Anti-EGFR-MET Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Mutated NSCLC

Niraparib

Poster Presentations

Abstract #TPS5588

A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Versus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (MAGNITUDE)

Abstract #5562

Association of Detectable Levels of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) with Disease Burden in Prostate Cancer

Early-Stage Pipeline

Teclistamab

Oral Presentation

Abstract #100

Phase 1 Study of Teclistamab, a Humanized BCMA x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in RRMM

Cusatuzumab

Poster Presentation

Abstract #TPS7565

CULMINATE: A Phase 2 Study of Cusatuzumab + Azacitidine in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

Lazertinib

Poster Presentations

Abstract #9571

Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity of Lazertinib in Patients with Advanced NSCLC Who Progressed After Prior EGFR TKI Therapy: Data from a Phase 1/2 Study±

Abstract #9601

ctDNA Resistance Landscape of Lazertinib, a Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine

Kinase Inhibitor±

* Abstracts submitted by Amgen in collaboration with Janssen Oncology
± Abstract submitted by Yuhan Corporation, which entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Janssen Biotech, Inc. for the development of lazertinib
** Abstracts were submitted by IMBRUVICA co-developer partner, Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company

About JNJ-4528
JNJ-4528 (LCAR-B38M) is an investigational CAR-T therapy for the treatment of patients with RRMM. In December 2017, Janssen entered into an exclusive worldwide license and collaboration agreement with Legend Biotech to develop and commercialize JNJ-4528. In May 2018, Janssen initiated a Phase 1b/2 trial (NCT03548207) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JNJ-4528 in adults with RRMM, informed by the LEGEND-2 study results.

In December 2019, Janssen announced receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the U.S. FDA, which is granted to expedite the development and regulatory review of an investigational medicine that is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition. In February 2019, the U.S. FDA granted Janssen an Orphan Drug Designation for JNJ-4528, and in February 2020, the European Commission granted Janssen an orphan designation for JNJ-4528. In February 2019, JNJ-4528 was granted PRIME (PRIority MEdicines) designation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

About ERLEADA
ERLEADA (apalutamide) is an androgen receptor inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).1 ERLEADA received U.S. FDA approval for nmCRPC in February 2018, and was approved for mCSPC in September 2019.3

For more information, visit www.ERLEADA.com.

About Amivantamab
Amivantamab (JNJ-6372) is an investigational EGFRxMET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity that targets activating and resistant EGFR and MET mutations and amplifications.2,3 The production and development of the antibody followed Janssen Biotech, Inc.’s licensing agreement with Genmab for use of its DuoBody technology platform. Amivantamab is being explored as both a monotherapy and combination therapy for patients with NSCLC who harbor genetic alterations. In March 2020, the U.S. FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for amivantamab for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations, whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.

About Teclistamab
Teclistamab (JNJ-7957) is an investigational bispecific antibody targeting both BCMA and CD3. CD3 is involved in activating the immune system’s response to fight infection, and BCMA is expressed at significantly higher levels in people with multiple myeloma.4,5,6,7,8 Teclistamab redirects CD3 T-cells to BCMA-expressing myeloma cells to induce cytotoxicity of the targeted cells.6,7 Results from preclinical studies demonstrate that teclistamab kills myeloma cell lines and myeloma bone marrow cells from heavily pretreated patients.7

Teclistamab is currently being evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical study for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and is also being explored in combination studies. The production and development of the antibody followed Janssen Biotech, Inc.’s licensing agreement with Genmab for use of its DuoBody technology platform.

About DARZALEX and DARZALEX FASPRO
DARZALEX has been approved in seven indications, three of which are in the frontline setting, including newly diagnosed patients who are transplant eligible and ineligible.9,10,11,12,13,14 DARZALEX FASPROTM received FDA approval on May 1, 2020 in five indications, two of which are in the frontline setting in newly diagnosed patients who are transplant ineligible. In August 2012, Janssen entered into an exclusive global license and development agreement with Genmab A/S to develop, manufacture, and commercialize DARZALEX.15

For more information, visit www.DARZALEX.com.

About IMBRUVICA
IMBRUVICA is a once-a-day, first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor that is administered orally, and is jointly developed and commercialized by Janssen Biotech, Inc. and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company. IMBRUVICA is indicated for adults in six disease areas, including five hematologic cancers and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD).16

For more information, visit www.IMBRUVICA.com.

About BALVERSATM
BALVERSA (erdafitinib) is a once-daily, oral fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adults who have locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that has susceptible FGFR3 or FGFR2 genetic alterations and who have progressed during or following at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy, including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy.17 In 2008, Janssen entered into an exclusive worldwide license and collaboration agreement with Astex Pharmaceuticals to develop and commercialize BALVERSA.

For more information, visit www.BALVERSA.com.

About Niraparib
Niraparib is an orally-administered selective poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that is currently being studied by Janssen for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. In October 2019, niraparib received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the U.S. FDA based on the Phase 2 GALAHAD study in patients with mCRPC.

In April 2016, Janssen entered a worldwide (except Japan) collaboration and license agreement with TESARO, Inc. (now GSK),20 for exclusive rights to niraparib in prostate cancer. In the U.S., niraparib is indicated for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy; for the treatment of adult patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who have been treated with three or more prior chemotherapy regimens and whose cancer is associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive status defined by either: a deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA mutation, or genomic instability and who have progressed more than six months after response to the last platinum-based chemotherapy. Niraparib is currently marketed by GSK as ZEJULA.18

For more information, visit www.ZEJULA.com.

About Cusatuzumab
Cusatuzumab, also known as ARGX-110, is an investigational antibody that targets CD70, an immune target involved in hematological malignancies. Cusatuzumab is being explored as a foundation therapy for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In December 2018, Cilag GmbH International, an affiliate of Janssen entered into a worldwide collaboration and license agreement with argenx BVBA and argenx SE, to develop and commercialize cusatuzumab.19

ERLEADA IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Ischemic cardiovascular events — In a randomized study (SPARTAN) of patients with nmCRPC, ischemic cardiovascular events occurred in 4% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 3% of patients treated with placebo. In a randomized study (TITAN) in patients with mCSPC, ischemic cardiovascular events occurred in 4% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 2% of patients treated with placebo. Across the SPARTAN and TITAN studies, 6 patients (0.5%) treated with ERLEADA and 2 patients (0.2%) treated with placebo died from an ischemic cardiovascular event. Patients with current evidence of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure within six months of randomization were excluded from the SPARTAN and TITAN studies.

Ischemic cardiovascular events, including events leading to death, occurred in patients receiving ERLEADA. Monitor for signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease. Optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. Consider discontinuation of ERLEADA for Grade 3 and 4 events.

Fractures — In a randomized study (SPARTAN) of patients with nmCRPC, fractures occurred in 12% of patients treated with ERLEADA and in 7% of patients treated with placebo. In a randomized study (TITAN) of patients with mCSPC, fractures occurred in 9% of patients treated with ERLEADA and in 6% of patients treated with placebo. Evaluate patients for fracture risk. Monitor and manage patients at risk for fractures according to established treatment guidelines and consider use of bone targeted agents.

Falls — In a randomized study (SPARTAN), falls occurred in 16% of patients treated with ERLEADA compared to 9% of patients treated with placebo. Falls were not associated with loss of consciousness or seizure. Falls occurred in patients receiving ERLEADA with increased frequency in the elderly. Evaluate patients for fall risk.

Seizure — In two randomized studies (SPARTAN and TITAN), five patients (0.4%) treated with ERLEADA and one patient treated with placebo (0.1%) experienced a seizure. Permanently discontinue ERLEADA in patients who develop a seizure during treatment. It is unknown whether anti-epileptic medications will prevent seizures with ERLEADA. Advise patients of the risk of developing a seizure while receiving ERLEADA and of engaging in any activity where sudden loss of consciousness could cause harm to themselves or others.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity — The safety and efficacy of ERLEADA have not been established in females. Based on its mechanism of action, ERLEADA can cause fetal harm and loss of pregnancy when administered to a pregnant female. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for 3 months after the last dose of ERLEADA [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3)].

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Adverse Reactions — The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) that occurred more frequently in the ERLEADA-treated patients (≥ 2% over placebo) from the randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (TITAN and SPARTAN) were fatigue, arthralgia, rash, decreased appetite, fall, weight decreased, hypertension, hot flush, diarrhea and fracture.

Laboratory Abnormalities — All Grades (Grade 3-4)

Hematology — In TITAN study, white blood cell decreased ERLEADA 27% (0.4%), placebo 19% (0.6%). In SPARTAN study anemia ERLEADA 70% (0.4%), placebo 64% (0.5%); leukopenia ERLEADA 47% (0.3%), placebo 29% (0%); lymphopenia ERLEADA 41% (2%), placebo 21% (2%)
Chemistry — In TITAN study, hypertriglyceridemia ERLEADA 17% (3%), placebo 12% (2%). In SPARTAN study hypercholesterolemia ERLEADA 76% (0.1%), placebo 46% (0%); hyperglycemia ERLEADA 70% (2%), placebo 59% (1%); hypertriglyceridemia ERLEADA 67% (2%), placebo 49% (0.8%); hyperkalemia ERLEADA 32% (2%), placebo 22% (0.5%).
Rash — In two randomized studies, rash was most commonly described as macular or maculo-papular. Adverse reactions of rash were 26% with ERLEADA versus 8% with placebo. Grade 3 rashes (defined as covering >30% body surface area [BSA]) were reported with ERLEADA treatment (6%) versus placebo (0.5%).

The onset of rash occurred at a median of 83 days. Rash resolved in 78% of patients within a median of 78 days from onset of rash. Rash was commonly managed with oral antihistamines, topical corticosteroids, and 19% of patients received systemic corticosteroids. Dose reduction or dose interruption occurred in 14% and 28% of patients, respectively. Of the patients who had dose interruption, 59% experienced recurrence of rash upon reintroduction of ERLEADA.

Hypothyroidism — In two randomized studies hypothyroidism, was reported for 8% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 2% of patients treated with placebo based on assessments of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) every 4 months. Elevated TSH occurred in 25% of patients treated with ERLEADA and 7% of patients treated with placebo. The median onset was at the first scheduled assessment. There were no Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions. Thyroid replacement therapy, when clinically indicated, should be initiated or dose-adjusted.

DRUG INTERACTIONS
Effect of Other Drugs on ERLEADA — Co-administration of a strong CYP2C8 or CYP3A4 inhibitor is predicted to increase the steady-state exposure of the active moieties. No initial dose adjustment is necessary; however, reduce the ERLEADA dose based on tolerability [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Effect of ERLEADA on Other Drugs — ERLEADA is a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19, and a weak inducer of CYP2C9 in humans. Concomitant use of ERLEADA with medications that are primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C19, or CYP2C9 can result in lower exposure to these medications. Substitution for these medications is recommended when possible or evaluate for loss of activity if medication is continued. Concomitant administration of ERLEADA with medications that are substrates of UDP-glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) can result in decreased exposure. Use caution if substrates of UGT must be co-administered with ERLEADA and evaluate for loss of activity.

P-gp, BCRP or OATP1B1 substrates — Apalutamide is a weak inducer of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) clinically. Concomitant use of ERLEADA with medications that are substrates of P-gp, BCRP, or OATP1B1 can result in lower exposure of these medications. Use caution if substrates of P-gp, BCRP or OATP1B1 must be co-administered with ERLEADA and evaluate for loss of activity if medication is continued.

Please see the full Prescribing Information for ERLEADA

DARZALEX FASPROTM IMPORTANT SAFETY IMFORMATION
CONTRAINDICATIONS
DARZALEX FASPRO (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj) is contraindicated in patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity to daratumumab, hyaluronidase or any of the components of the formulation.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Hypersensitivity and Other Administration Reactions
Both systemic administration-related reactions, including severe or life-threatening reactions, and local injection-site reactions can occur with DARZALEX FASPRO.

Systemic Reactions

In a pooled safety population of 490 patients who received DARZALEX FASPRO as monotherapy or in combination, 11% of patients experienced a systemic administration-related reaction (Grade 2: 3.9%, Grade 3: 1.4%). Systemic administration-related reactions occurred in 10% of patients with the first injection, 0.2% with the second injection, and cumulatively 0.8% with subsequent injections. The median time to onset was 3.7 hours (range: 9 minutes to 3.5 days). Of the 84 systemic administration-related reactions that occurred in 52 patients, 73 (87%) occurred on the day of DARZALEX FASPRO administration. Delayed systemic administration-related reactions have occurred in less than 1% of the patients.

Severe reactions included hypoxia, dyspnea, hypertension and tachycardia. Other signs and symptoms of systemic administration-related reactions may include respiratory symptoms, such as bronchospasm, nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, allergic rhinitis, and wheezing, as well as anaphylactic reaction, pyrexia, chest pain, pruritis, chills, vomiting, nausea, and hypotension.

Pre-medicate patients with histamine-1 receptor antagonist, acetaminophen and corticosteroids. Monitor patients for systemic administration-related reactions, especially following the first and second injections. For anaphylactic reaction or life-threatening (Grade 4) administration-related reactions, immediately and permanently discontinue DARZALEX FASPRO. Consider administering corticosteroids and other medications after the administration of DARZALEX FASPRO depending on dosing regimen and medical history to minimize the risk of delayed (defined as occurring the day after administration) systemic administration-related reactions.

Local Reactions

In this pooled safety population, injection-site reactions occurred in 8% of patients, including Grade 2 reactions in 0.6%. The most frequent (>1%) injection-site reaction was injection site erythema. These local reactions occurred a median of 7 minutes (range: 0 minutes to 4.7 days) after starting administration of DARZALEX FASPRO. Monitor for local reactions and consider symptomatic management.

Neutropenia
Daratumumab may increase neutropenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. Consider withholding DARZALEX FASPRO until recovery of neutrophils. In lower body weight patients receiving DARZALEX FASPRO, higher rates of Grade 3-4 neutropenia were observed.

Thrombocytopenia
Daratumumab may increase thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Consider withholding DARZALEX FASPRO until recovery of platelets.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Based on the mechanism of action, DARZALEX FASPRO can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. DARZALEX FASPRO may cause depletion of fetal immune cells and decreased bone density. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females with reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with DARZALEX FASPRO and for 3 months after the last dose.

The combination of DARZALEX FASPRO with lenalidomide is contraindicated in pregnant women, because lenalidomide may cause birth defects and death of the unborn child. Refer to the lenalidomide prescribing information on use during pregnancy.

Interference with Serological Testing
Daratumumab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and results in a positive Indirect Antiglobulin Test (Indirect Coombs test). Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect antiglobulin test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab administration. Daratumumab bound to RBCs masks detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient’s serum. The determination of a patient’s ABO and Rh blood type are not impacted.

Notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with serological testing and inform blood banks that a patient has received DARZALEX FASPRO. Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX FASPRO.

Interference with Determination of Complete Response
Daratumumab is a human IgG kappa monoclonal antibody that can be detected on both the serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein. This interference can impact the determination of complete response and of disease progression in some DARZALEX FASPRO-treated patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein.

ADVERSE REACTIONS
The most common adverse reaction (≥20%) with DARZALEX FASPRO monotherapy is: upper respiratory tract infection. The most common adverse reactions with combination therapy (≥20% for any combination) include fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, pyrexia, cough, muscle spasms, back pain, vomiting, upper respiratory tract infection, peripheral sensory neuropathy, constipation, and pneumonia.

The most common hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥40%) with DARZALEX FASPRO are: decreased leukocytes, decreased lymphocytes, decreased neutrophils, decreased platelets, and decreased hemoglobin.

Please see the full Prescribing Information for DARZALEX FASPRO

DARZALEX IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

CONTRAINDICATIONS
DARZALEX (daratumumab) is contraindicated in patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylactic reactions) to daratumumab or any of the components of the formulation.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Infusion Reactions – DARZALEX can cause severe and/or serious infusion reactions, including anaphylactic reactions. In clinical trials, approximately half of all patients experienced an infusion reaction. Most infusion reactions occurred during the first infusion and were Grade 1-2. Infusion reactions can also occur with subsequent infusions. Nearly all reactions occurred during infusion or within 4 hours of completing DARZALEX. Prior to the introduction of post-infusion medication in clinical trials, infusion reactions occurred up to 48 hours after infusion. Severe reactions have occurred, including bronchospasm, hypoxia, dyspnea, hypertension, laryngeal edema, and pulmonary edema. Signs and symptoms may include respiratory symptoms, such as nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, as well as chills, vomiting, and nausea. Less common symptoms were wheezing, allergic rhinitis, pyrexia, chest discomfort, pruritus, and hypotension.

Pre-medicate patients with antihistamines, antipyretics, and corticosteroids. Frequently monitor patients during the entire infusion. Interrupt infusion for reactions of any severity and institute medical management as needed. Permanently discontinue therapy if an anaphylactic reaction or life-threatening (Grade 4) reaction occurs and institute appropriate emergency care. For patients with Grade 1, 2, or 3 reactions, reduce the infusion rate when re-starting the infusion.

To reduce the risk of delayed infusion reactions, administer oral corticosteroids to all patients following DARZALEX infusions. Patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may require additional post-infusion medications to manage respiratory complications. Consider prescribing short- and long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Interference with Serological Testing – Daratumumab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and results in a positive Indirect Antiglobulin Test (Indirect Coombs test). Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect antiglobulin test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab infusion. Daratumumab bound to RBCs masks detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient’s serum. The determination of a patient’s ABO and Rh blood type are not impacted. Notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with serological testing and inform blood banks that a patient has received DARZALEX. Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX.

Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia – DARZALEX may increase neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to the manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. DARZALEX dose delay may be required to allow recovery of neutrophils and/or platelets. No dose reduction of DARZALEX is recommended. Consider supportive care with growth factors for neutropenia or transfusions for thrombocytopenia.

Interference with Determination of Complete Response – Daratumumab is a human IgG kappa monoclonal antibody that can be detected on both the serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein. This interference can impact the determination of complete response and of disease progression in some patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein.

Adverse Reactions – The most frequently reported adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) were: infusion reactions, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, asthenia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, decreased appetite, vomiting, muscle spasms, arthralgia, back pain, pyrexia, chills, dizziness, insomnia, cough, dyspnea, peripheral edema, peripheral sensory neuropathy, bronchitis, pneumonia, and upper respiratory tract infection.

DARZALEX in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd): The most frequent (≥20%) adverse reactions for newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory patients were, respectively, infusion reactions (41%, 48%), diarrhea (57%, 43%), nausea (32%, 24%), fatigue (40%, 35%), pyrexia (23%, 20%), upper respiratory tract infection (52%, 65%), muscle spasms (29%, 26%), dyspnea (32%, 21%), and cough (30%, 30%). In newly diagnosed patients, constipation (41%), peripheral edema (41%), back pain (34%), asthenia (32%), bronchitis (29%), pneumonia (26%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (24%), and decreased appetite (22%) were also reported. In newly diagnosed patients, serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to Rd) were pneumonia (15%), bronchitis (4%), and dehydration (2%), and treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were neutropenia (56%), lymphopenia (52%), and leukopenia (35%). In relapsed/refractory patients, serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to Rd) were pneumonia (12%), upper respiratory tract infection (7%), influenza (3%), and pyrexia (3%), and treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were neutropenia (53%) and lymphopenia (52%).

DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (DVMP): The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were upper respiratory tract infection (48%), infusion reactions (28%), and peripheral edema (21%). Serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to the VMP arm) were pneumonia (11%), upper respiratory tract infection (5%), and pulmonary edema (2%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (58%), neutropenia (44%), and thrombocytopenia (38%).

DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd): The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (47%), infusion reactions (45%), upper respiratory tract infection (44%), diarrhea (32%), cough (27%), peripheral edema (22%), and dyspnea (21%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 42%. Serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to Vd) were upper respiratory tract infection (5%), diarrhea (2%), and atrial fibrillation (2%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (48%) and thrombocytopenia (47%).

DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVTd): The most frequent adverse reactions (≥20%) were infusion reactions (35%), nausea (30%), upper respiratory tract infection (27%), pyrexia (26%), and bronchitis (20%). Serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to the VTd arm) were bronchitis (DVTd 2% vs. VTd <1%) and pneumonia (DVTd 6% vs. VTd 4%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (59%), neutropenia (33%), and leukopenia (24%).

DARZALEX in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd): The most frequent adverse reactions (>20%) were fatigue (50%), infusion reactions (50%), upper respiratory tract infection (50%), cough (43%), diarrhea (38%), constipation (33%), dyspnea (33%), nausea (30%), muscle spasms (26%), back pain (25%), pyrexia (25%), insomnia (23%), arthralgia (22%), dizziness (21%), and vomiting (21%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 49%. Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥5% of patients included pneumonia (7%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were neutropenia (82%), lymphopenia (71%), and anemia (30%).

DARZALEX as monotherapy: The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were infusion reactions (48%), fatigue (39%), nausea (27%), back pain (23%), pyrexia (21%), cough (21%), and upper respiratory tract infection (20%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 33%. The most frequent serious adverse reactions were pneumonia (6%), general physical health deterioration (3%), and pyrexia (3%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (40%) and neutropenia (20%).

Please see the full Prescribing Information for DARZALEX

IMBRUVICA IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Hemorrhage: Fatal bleeding events have occurred in patients who received IMBRUVICA. Major hemorrhage (≥ Grade 3, serious, or any central nervous system events; e.g., intracranial hemorrhage [including subdural hematoma], gastrointestinal bleeding, hematuria, and post procedural hemorrhage) occurred in 4% of patients, with fatalities occurring in 0.4% of 2,838 patients who received IMBRUVICA in 27 clinical trials. Bleeding events, including bruising and petechiae, occurred in 39% of patients who received IMBRUVICA.

The mechanism for the bleeding events is not well understood.

Use of either anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents concomitantly with IMBRUVICA increases the risk of major hemorrhage. Across clinical trials, 3.1% of 2,838 patients who received IMBRUVICA without antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy experienced major hemorrhage. The addition of antiplatelet therapy with or without anticoagulant therapy increased this percentage to 4.4%, and the addition of anticoagulant therapy with or without antiplatelet therapy increased this percentage to 6.1%. Consider the risks and benefits of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy when co-administered with IMBRUVICA. Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding.

Consider the benefit-risk of withholding IMBRUVICA for at least 3 to 7 days pre- and post-surgery depending upon the type of surgery and the risk of bleeding.

Infections: Fatal and non-fatal infections (including bacterial, viral, or fungal) have occurred with IMBRUVICA therapy. Grade 3 or greater infections occurred in 21% of 1,476 patients who received IMBRUVICA in clinical trials. Cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) have occurred in patients treated with IMBRUVICA. Consider prophylaxis according to standard of care in patients who are at increased risk for opportunistic infections.

Monitor and evaluate patients for fever and infections and treat appropriately.

Cytopenias: In 645 patients with B‑cell malignancies who received IMBRUVICA as a single agent, Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 23% of patients, Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 8% and Grade 3 or 4 anemia in 3%, based on laboratory measurements.

Monitor complete blood counts monthly.

Cardiac Arrhythmias: Fatal and serious cardiac arrhythmias have occurred with IMBRUVICA. Grade 3 or greater ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 0.2% of patients and Grade 3 or greater atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter occurred in 4% of 1,476 patients who received IMBRUVICA in clinical trials. These events have occurred particularly in patients with cardiac risk factors, hypertension, acute infections, and a previous history of cardiac arrhythmias.

Periodically monitor patients clinically for cardiac arrhythmias. Obtain an ECG for patients who develop arrhythmic symptoms (e.g., palpitations, lightheadedness, syncope, chest pain) or new onset dyspnea. Manage cardiac arrhythmias appropriately, and if it persists, consider the risks and benefits of IMBRUVICA treatment and follow dose modification guidelines.

Hypertension: Hypertension occurred in 19% of 1,476 patients who received IMBRUVICA in clinical trials. Grade 3 or greater hypertension occurred in 8% of patients. Based on data from 1,124 of these patients, the median time to onset was 5.9 months (range, 0.03 to 24 months).

Monitor blood pressure in patients treated with IMBRUVICA and initiate or adjust anti-hypertensive medication throughout treatment with IMBRUVICA as appropriate.

Second Primary Malignancies: Other malignancies (10%), including non-skin carcinomas (4%), occurred among the 1,476 patients who received IMBRUVICA in clinical trials. The most frequent second primary malignancy was non-melanoma skin cancer (6%).

Tumor Lysis Syndrome: Tumor lysis syndrome has been infrequently reported with IMBRUVICA. Assess the baseline risk (e.g., high tumor burden) and take appropriate precautions.

Monitor patients closely and treat as appropriate.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Based on findings in animals, IMBRUVICA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with IMBRUVICA and for 1 month after the last dose. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during the same time period.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

B-cell malignancies: The most common adverse reactions (≥30%) in patients with B-cell malignancies (MCL, CLL/SLL, WM and MZL) were thrombocytopenia (54.5%)*, diarrhea (43.8%), fatigue (39.1%), musculoskeletal pain (38.8%), neutropenia (38.6%)*, rash (35.8%), anemia (35.0%)*, and bruising (32.0%).

The most common Grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions (≥5%) in patients with B-cell malignancies (MCL, CLL/SLL, WM and MZL) were neutropenia (20.7%)*, thrombocytopenia (13.6%)*, pneumonia (8.2%), and hypertension (8.0%).

Approximately 9% (CLL/SLL), 14% (MCL), 14% (WM) and 10% (MZL) of patients had a dose reduction due to adverse reactions. Approximately 4-10% (CLL/SLL), 9% (MCL), and 7% (WM [5%] and MZL [13%]) of patients discontinued due to adverse reactions.

cGVHD: The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients with cGVHD were fatigue (57%), bruising (40%), diarrhea (36%), thrombocytopenia (33%)*, muscle spasms (29%), stomatitis (29%), nausea (26%), hemorrhage (26%), anemia (24%)*, and pneumonia (21%).

The most common Grade 3 or higher adverse reactions (≥5%) reported in patients with cGVHD were pneumonia (14%), fatigue (12%), diarrhea (10%), neutropenia (10%)*, sepsis (10%), hypokalemia (7%), headache (5%), musculoskeletal pain (5%), and pyrexia (5%).

Twenty-four percent of patients receiving IMBRUVICA in the cGVHD trial discontinued treatment due to adverse reactions. Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 26% of patients.

*Treatment-emergent decreases (all grades) were based on laboratory measurements.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

CYP3A Inhibitors: Co-administration of IMBRUVICA with strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitors may increase ibrutinib plasma concentrations. Dose modifications of IMBRUVICA may be recommended when used concomitantly with posaconazole, voriconazole, and moderate CYP3A inhibitors. Avoid concomitant use of other strong CYP3A inhibitors. Interrupt IMBRUVICA if strong inhibitors are used short-term (e.g., for ≤ 7 days). See dose modification guidelines in USPI sections 2.4 and 7.1.

CYP3A Inducers: Avoid coadministration with strong CYP3A inducers.

SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Hepatic Impairment (based on Child-Pugh criteria): Avoid use of IMBRUVICA in patients with severe baseline hepatic impairment. In patients with mild or moderate impairment, reduce recommended IMBRUVICA dose and monitor more frequently for adverse reactions of IMBRUVICA.

Please see the full Prescribing Information for IMBRUVICA.

BALVERSA IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Warnings and Precautions
Ocular Disorders – BALVERSA can cause ocular disorders, including central serous retinopathy/retinal pigment epithelial detachment (CSR/RPED) resulting in visual field defect.

CSR/RPED was reported in 25% of patients treated with BALVERSA, with a median time to first onset of 50 days. Grade 3 CSR/RPED, involving central field of vision, was reported in 3% of patients. CSR/RPED resolved in 13% of patients and was ongoing in 13% of patients at the study cutoff. CSR/RPED led to dose interruptions and reductions in 9% and 14% of patients, respectively, and 3% of patients discontinued BALVERSA. Dry eye symptoms occurred in 28% of patients during treatment with BALVERSA and were Grade 3 in 6% of patients. All patients should receive dry eye prophylaxis with ocular demulcents as needed.

Perform monthly ophthalmological examinations during the first 4 months of treatment and every 3 months afterwards, and urgently at any time for visual symptoms. Ophthalmological examination should include assessment of visual acuity, slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, and optical coherence tomography. Withhold BALVERSA when CSR occurs and permanently discontinue if it does not resolve within 4 weeks or if Grade 4 in severity. For ocular adverse reactions, follow the dose modification guidelines [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)].

Hyperphosphatemia – Increases in phosphate levels are a pharmacodynamic effect of BALVERSA [see Pharmacodynamics (12.2)]. Hyperphosphatemia was reported as adverse reaction in 76% of patients treated with BALVERSA. The median onset time for any grade event of hyperphosphatemia was 20 days (range: 8–116) after initiating BALVERSA. Thirty-two percent of patients received phosphate binders during treatment with BALVERSA. Monitor for hyperphosphatemia and follow the dose modification guidelines when required [see Dosage and Administration (2.2, 2.3)].

Embryo-fetal Toxicity – Based on the mechanism of action and findings in animal reproduction studies, BALVERSA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. In a rat embryo-fetal toxicity study, erdafitinib was embryotoxic and teratogenic at exposures less than the human exposures at all doses studied. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise female patients of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with BALVERSA and for one month after the last dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with BALVERSA and for one month after the last dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1, 8.3) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)].

Most common adverse reactions including laboratory abnormalities ≥20% :

Phosphate increased (76%), stomatitis (56%), fatigue (54%), creatinine increased (52%), diarrhea (47%), dry mouth (45%), onycholysis (41%), alanine aminotransferase increased (41%), alkaline phosphatase increased (41%), sodium decreased (40%), decreased appetite (38%), albumin decreased (37%), dysgeusia (37%), hemoglobin decreased (35%), dry skin (34%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (30%), magnesium decreased (30%), dry eye (28%), alopecia (26%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (26%), constipation (28%), phosphate decreased (24%), abdominal pain (23%), calcium increased (22%), nausea (21%), and musculoskeletal pain (20%). The most common Grade 3 or greater adverse reactions (>1%) were stomatitis (9%), nail dystrophy*, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (6%), paronychia (3%), nail disorder*, keratitis†, onycholysis* (10%), and hyperphosphatemia.

*Included within onycholysis. †Included within dry eye.

An adverse reaction with a fatal outcome in 1% of patients was acute myocardial infarction.
Serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients, including eye disorders (10%).
Permanent discontinuation due to an adverse reaction occurred in 13% of patients. The most frequent reasons for permanent discontinuation included eye disorders (6%).
Dosage interruptions occurred in 68% of patients. The most frequent adverse reactions requiring dosage interruption included hyperphosphatemia (24%), stomatitis (17%), eye disorders (17%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (8%).
Dose reductions occurred in 53% of patients. The most frequent adverse reactions for dose reductions included eye disorders (23%), stomatitis (15%), hyperphosphatemia (7%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (7%), paronychia (7%), and nail dystrophy (6%).
Drug Interactions

Moderate CYP2C9 or strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors: Consider alternative agents or monitor closely for adverse reactions. (7.1)
Strong CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 inducers: Avoid concomitant use with BALVERSA. (7.1)
Moderate CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 inducers: Increase BALVERSA dose up to 9 mg. (7.1)
Serum phosphate level-altering agents: Avoid concomitant use with agents that can alter serum phosphate levels before the initial dose modification period. (2.3, 7.1)
CYP3A4 substrates: Avoid concomitant use with sensitive CYP3A4 substrates with narrow therapeutic indices. (7.2)
OCT2 substrates: Consider alternative agents or consider reducing the dose of OCT2 substrates based on tolerability. (7.2)
P-gp substrates: Separate BALVERSA administration by at least 6 hours before or after administration of P-gp substrates with narrow therapeutic indices. (7.2)
Use in Specific Populations
Lactation – Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions from erdafitinib in a breastfed child, advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with BALVERSA and for one month following the last dose.

Data Affirming Biocept’s Target Selector™ Platform Identifies Cancer Mutations in Cerebrospinal Fluid Presented at ASCO 2020 Virtual Scientific Program

On May 29, 2020 Biocept, Inc. (NASDAQ: BIOC), a leading commercial provider of molecular technologies designed to provide physicians with clinically actionable information to improve the outcomes of patients with cancer, announces the presentation of data affirming the ability of its Target Selector platform to identify potentially actionable mutations in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients whose cancer has metastasized to the central nervous system (Press release, Biocept, MAY 29, 2020, View Source [SID1234558761]). The data were presented today by Kevin Kalinsky, MD, MS, associate professor of medicine at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, an oncologist at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and the study’s principal investigator, in a poster at the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2020 Virtual Scientific Program. The abstract is available here.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The presence of tumor cells in cerebrospinal fluid may be an indicator of brain metastases, which occur when cancer has spread to the central nervous system. Biocept’s Target Selector assays can detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating DNA (ctDNA) and identify cancer associated biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid. The Company can also identify biomarkers with testing CTCs and ctDNA in the blood of patients diagnosed with cancer. Identifying biomarkers is necessary for physicians in selecting targeted therapies. Up to 30% and 36% of patients diagnosed with breast and lung cancer, respectively, will develop brain metastases during the course of treatment. In January 2020, Biocept announced the commercial availability of its Target Selector cerebrospinal fluid assays for the rapid identification of molecular alterations in brain metastases in patients with primary breast or lung cancer.

The poster presentation today reported higher sensitivity with Target Selector in detecting cancer material and identifying leptomeningeal metastases (cancer in the thin layers of tissue that cover and protect the brain and spinal cord) in cerebrospinal fluid compared with cerebrospinal fluid cytology, the standard-of-care technology.

"Cerebrospinal fluid cytology for the detection of leptomeningeal metastases is the standard, but it often results in false negative results, and lacks sensitivity in detecting biomarkers. These results show Biocept’s Target Selector is a promising tool to meet an underserved need in providing this critical information," said Dr. Kalinsky.

"We are excited to share these data at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) as they support our belief that Target Selector has potential applicability for identifying actionable mutations in patients with brain metastases allowing physicians the choice to test cerebrospinal fluid, blood or both when looking for biomarker information in order to choose the most appropriate therapy," said Michael Nall, President and CEO of Biocept. "We are planning a larger study to further validate the sensitivity of our Target Selector technology compared with cerebrospinal fluid cytology with the goal of making our platform the standard of care for leptomeningeal metastases testing.

"We’d like to thank Dr. Kalinsky for his continued leadership of this study and others at Biocept who help further validate the use of our technology for the benefit of patients with devastating cancer metastases," he added.

Dr. Kalinsky reports no related financial or conflicts of interest with this study.

About Biocept’s Cerebrospinal Fluid Testing
A medical procedure known as a spinal tap or lumbar puncture is typically performed to collect cerebrospinal fluid when cancer patients present with central nervous system symptoms, for example confusion or dementia. More than 200,000 of these procedures are performed annually in the U.S. Biocept’s Target Selector testing provides an alternative and potentially more accurate means of detecting biomarkers from CTCs or ctDNA of patients with cancer that has metastasized to the central nervous system compared with cerebrospinal fluid cytology. For more information about Biocept’s Target Selector testing, please contact Biocept Customer Services at 888-332-7729.

Cardiff Oncology Data Continues to Demonstrate Efficacy of Onvansertib in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Presented at ASCO

On May 29, 2020 Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (Nasdaq: CRDF), a clinical-stage oncology therapeutics company developing drugs to treat cancers with the greatest medical need for new treatment options, including KRAS-mutated colorectal cancer, Zytiga-resistant prostate cancer and leukemia, reported additional positive efficacy and favorable safety data were featured in a virtual oral poster presentation at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) conference (Press release, Cardiff Oncology, MAY 29, 2020, View Source [SID1234558760]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The new data from Cardiff Oncology’s ongoing Phase 1b/2 clinical trial of onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI and Avastin (bevacizumab) for second-line treatment of patients with KRAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continues to demonstrate that primary efficacy endpoint of overall objective response (ORR), as measured by tumor regression, is ten-fold greater than current standard-of-care of 4%. To-date, 89% of evaluable patients in the onvansertib trial have achieved a clinical response and the response appears durable with patients having progression-free survival (PFS) of at least 6 months. Onvansertib has also shown its effectiveness in targeting the most prevalent KRAS mutation subtypes associated with colorectal cancer, which until recently have been considered to be undruggable.

"We are pleased to be participating in this clinical trial and importantly, our patients are not only tolerating the combination of onvansertib plus standard-of-care FOLFIRI and bevacizumab, but we are very encouraged by the efficacy we are seeing," said Dr. Daniel Ahn, lead investigator and medical oncologist, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Arizona. "Being able to effectively treat patients with KRAS-mutated mCRC has been a challenge and their prognosis is poor. Onvansertib is showing great potential as a new second-line treatment option, in combination with standard-of-care, for these patients."

"Our trial is achieving critical milestones and gaining momentum," said Dr. Mark Erlander, Chief Executive Officer of Cardiff Oncology. "We continue to see safety and efficacy demonstrated and this, coupled with the FDA granting of Fast Track Designation, is further validation of the potential value of onvansertib to tackle the once undruggable KRAS-mutations that drive aggressive growth of CRC tumors."

Highlights of the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Presentation – Onvansertib in KRAS-Mutated mCRC Phase 1b/2 Trial

In the Phase 1b dose escalation, the 1st two dose levels (onvansertib 12 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2) have been cleared for safety; the 3rd dose level (onvansertib 18 mg/m2) is enrolling; the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached to-date
As of the data cutoff date, clinical response was observed in 8 (89%) of the 9 evaluable patients and post the data cutoff 1 additional patient achieved an objective response:
As of the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) cutoff date, 4 patients had experienced an objective response, and another 4 patients had stable disease
One patient proceeded to have successful curative surgery; an unprecedented event in this patient population
Progression-free survival (PFS) is >6 months, with 6 patients remaining on treatment
Decreases in plasma KRAS mutation level during the first cycle of treatment are highly predictive of tumor regression and subsequent therapeutic response:
Onvansertib effectively targets all prevalent KRAS mutation subtypes associated with CRC
8 of the 9 patients had a KRAS mutation detected by ctDNA analysis at baseline (ddPCR and NGS)
Changes in KRAS mutant during cycle 1 of treatment were highly predictive of tumor regression:
5 patients had a decrease in KRAS mutant to non-detectable level in cycle 1 (28 days) and subsequent tumor regression at 8 weeks
The Phase 2 continuation trial will further assess the safety and efficacy of onvansertib at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in combination with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab, as well as the value of KRAS liquid biopsy to predict treatment response
About the Phase 1b/2 Clinical Trial of Onvansertib in KRAS-Mutated mCRC

The ongoing trial, A Phase 1b/2 Study of Onvansertib (PCM-075) in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab for Second‑Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a KRAS Mutation (NCT03829410) is evaluating the safety and efficacy of onvansertib in combination with standard-of-care FOLFIRI and Avastin (bevacizumab). Up to 44 patients, with a confirmed KRAS mutation, metastatic and unresectable disease, who have failed or are intolerant of treatment with FOLFOX (fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin) with or without Avastin (bevacizumab), will be enrolled. The trial is being conducted at two prestigious cancer centers: USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center.

About Onvansertib

Onvansertib is a first-in-class, third-generation, oral and highly-selective adenosine triphosphate (ATP) competitive inhibitor of the serine/threonine polo-like-kinase 1 (PLK1) enzyme, which is over-expressed in multiple cancers including leukemias, lymphomas and solid tumors. Onvansertib targets the PLK1 isoform only (not PLK2 or PLK3), is orally administered and has a 24-hour half-life with only mild-to-moderate side effects reported. Cardiff Oncology believes that targeting only PLK1 and having a favorable safety and tolerability profile, along with an improved dose/scheduling regimen will significantly improve on the outcome observed in previous studies with a former panPLK inhibitor in AML.

Onvansertib has demonstrated synergy in preclinical studies with numerous chemotherapies and targeted therapeutics used to treat leukemias, lymphomas and solid tumor cancers, including irinotecan, FLT3 and HDAC inhibitors, taxanes and cytotoxins. Cardiff Oncology believes the combination of onvansertib with other compounds has the potential to improve clinical efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), colorectal cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as well as other types of cancer.

Cardiff Oncology has three ongoing clinical trials of onvansertib: A Phase 2 trial of onvansertib in combination with Zytiga (abiraterone acetate)/prednisone in patients with mCRPC who are showing signs of early progressive disease (rise in PSA but minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic) while currently receiving Zytiga (NCT03414034); a Phase 1b/2 Study of onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI and Avastin for second-line treatment in patients with mCRC with a KRAS mutation (NCT03829410); and a Phase 2 clinical trial of onvansertib in combination with decitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory AML (NCT03303339).

Cardiff Oncology licensed onvansertib (also known as NMS-1286937 and PCM-075) from Nerviano Medical Sciences (NMS), the largest oncology-focused research and development company in Italy, and a leader in protein kinase drug development. NMS has an excellent track record of licensing innovative drugs to pharma/biotech companies, including Array (recently acquired by Pfizer), Ignyta (acquired by Roche) and Genentech.

Eisai Announces Updated Results of ENHANCE 1, a Phase 1b/2 Trial Investigating HALAVEN® (eribulin mesylate) plus KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer at ASCO 2020

On May 29, 2020 Eisai reported updated results from ENHANCE 1, a Phase 1b/2 study exploring the investigational combination of eribulin plus pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) from a poster discussion session at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper)’s ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)20 Virtual Scientific Program from May 29-31 (Abstract# 1015 / Poster# 100) (Press release, Eisai, MAY 29, 2020, View Source [SID1234558759]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Eisai logo. (PRNewsFoto/Eisai Inc.) (PRNewsfoto/Eisai Inc.)
Eisai logo. (PRNewsFoto/Eisai Inc.) (PRNewsfoto/Eisai Inc.)
This open-label, single-arm, multicenter, Phase 1b/2 study enrolled patients with mTNBC who had previously received zero to two systemic therapies for metastatic disease and were stratified by prior number of therapy (Stratum 1 = 0 prior therapies; Stratum 2 = 1-2 prior therapies). As there were no dose-limiting toxicities observed in Phase 1, patients received the recommended Phase 2 dose of eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1 and Day 8) and pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously on Day 1) of a 21-day cycle. At the time of data cutoff (July 31, 2019), 167 patients were enrolled (of which 149 patients had confirmed PD-L1 status). The primary objectives were safety and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 by independent imaging review. Secondary objectives included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) overall and by PD-L1 status. Previous findings from ENHANCE 1 were presented during a Spotlight Session at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) in 2017.

Updated findings presented during ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)20 showed:

In the study, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Safety information is consistent with previous reports.
Of the total patients enrolled (N=167), the combination of eribulin plus pembrolizumab resulted in an overall ORR of 23.4% (95% CI: 17.2-30.5), the primary efficacy endpoint of the study. The ORR in Stratum 1 (n=66) was 25.8% (95% CI: 15.8-38.0), and the ORR in Stratum 2 (n=101) was 21.8% (95% CI: 14.2-31.1). The overall median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-4.2 months), and the overall median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI: 13.3-18.5 months), which were secondary endpoints of the study.
In Stratum 1 of patients with confirmed PD-L1 status who received the combination of eribulin plus pembrolizumab in the first line (n=60):
ORR was 34.5% (95% CI: 17.9-54.3) in patients with PD-L1+ tumors (n=29) and 16.1% (95% CI: 5.5-33.7) in patients with PD-L1- tumors (n=31)
The median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.1-10.2 months) for patients with PD-L1+ tumors and 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.0-4.2 months) for patients with PD-L1- tumors
The median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 8.3-29.0 months) for patients with PD-L1+ tumors and 15.2 months (95% CI: 12.8-19.4 months) for patients with PD-L1- tumors
The median DOR was 8.3 months (95% CI: 3.2 months-NE) for patients with PD-L1+ tumors and 15.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-22.2 months) for patients with PD-L1- tumors
In Stratum 2 of patients with confirmed PD-L1 status who received the combination of eribulin plus pembrolizumab in the second line or later (n=89):
ORR was 24.4% (95% CI: 12.9-39.5) in patients with PD-L1+ tumors (n=45) and 18.2% (95% CI: 8.2-32.7) in patients with PD-L1- tumors (n=44)
The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.1-4.8 months) for patients with PD-L1+ tumors and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.3-6.3 months) for patients with PD-L1- tumors
The median OS was 14 months (95% CI: 11.0-19.4 months) in patients with PD-L1+ tumors and 15.5 months (95% CI: 12.4-18.7 months) in patients with PD-L1- tumors
The median DOR was 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-25.1 months) for patients with PD-L1+ tumors and 8.6 months (95% CI: 3.5-13.2 months) for patients with PD-L1- tumors
The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (66%), nausea (57%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (41%), alopecia (40%), and constipation (37%). No deaths were considered treatment related. The most common possibly immune-related TEAEs for pembrolizumab (occurring in >3% of patients) were hypothyroidism (18%), pneumonitis (11%), hyperthyroidism (8%) and infusion-related reaction (3%).

"Treatment options for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer remain limited, despite advances in the field," said Dr. Takashi Owa, Vice President, Chief Medicine Creation Officer and Chief Discovery Officer, Oncology Business Group at Eisai. "As a human health care company, we are committed to addressing cancers that remain difficult to treat, and this is evident in our ongoing investigation in triple-negative disease. As long as unmet needs exist, Eisai will persist in our efforts to innovate for patients."

This release discusses an investigational use for FDA-approved products. It is not intended to convey conclusions about efficacy and safety. There is no guarantee that any investigational uses of FDA-approved products will successfully complete clinical development or gain FDA approval.

Previously, data from ENHANCE 1 was reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in 2016 and 2017.

The study is being conducted under an existing clinical trial collaboration agreement between Eisai and Merck.

About HALAVEN (eribulin mesylate) Injection
HALAVEN (eribulin mesylate) injection is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who have previously received at least 2 chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of metastatic disease. Prior therapy should have included an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting.

Discovered and developed by Eisai, eribulin is a synthetic analog of halichondrin B, a natural product that was isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria okadai. First in the halichondrin class, eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor. Eribulin is believed to work primarily via a tubulin-based mechanism that causes prolonged and irreversible mitotic blockage, ultimately leading to apoptotic cell death. Additionally, in preclinical studies of human breast cancer, eribulin demonstrated complex effects on the tumor biology of surviving cancer cells, including increases in vascular perfusion resulting in reduced tumor hypoxia, and changes in the expression of genes in tumor specimens associated with a change in phenotype, promoting the epithelial phenotype, opposing the mesenchymal phenotype. Eribulin has also been shown to decrease the migration and invasiveness of human breast cancer cells.

Important Safety Information

Warnings and Precautions

Neutropenia: Severe neutropenia (ANC <500/mm3) lasting >1 week occurred in 12% of patients with mBC. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 5% of patients with mBC and 2 patients (0.4%) died from complications. Patients with mBC with elevated liver enzymes >3 × ULN and bilirubin >1.5 × ULN experienced a higher incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia than patients with normal levels. Monitor complete blood cell counts prior to each dose, and increase the frequency of monitoring in patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 cytopenias. Delay administration and reduce subsequent doses in patients who experience febrile neutropenia or Grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days.

Peripheral Neuropathy: Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 8% of patients with mBC (Grade 4=0.4%) and 22% developed a new or worsening neuropathy that had not recovered within a median follow-up duration of 269 days (range 25-662 days). Neuropathy lasting >1 year occurred in 5% of patients with mBC. Patients should be monitored for signs of peripheral motor and sensory neuropathy. Withhold HALAVEN in patients who experience Grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy until resolution to Grade 2 or less.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: HALAVEN can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with HALAVEN and for at least 2 weeks following the final dose. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with HALAVEN and for 3.5 months following the final dose.

QT Prolongation: Monitor for prolonged QT intervals in patients with congestive heart failure, bradyarrhythmias, drugs known to prolong the QT interval, and electrolyte abnormalities. Correct hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia prior to initiating HALAVEN and monitor these electrolytes periodically during therapy. Avoid in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.

Adverse Reactions
In patients with mBC receiving HALAVEN, the most common adverse reactions (≥25%) were neutropenia (82%), anemia (58%), asthenia/fatigue (54%), alopecia (45%), peripheral neuropathy (35%), nausea (35%), and constipation (25%). Febrile neutropenia (4%) and neutropenia (2%) were the most common serious adverse reactions. The most common adverse reaction resulting in discontinuation was peripheral neuropathy (5%).

Use in Specific Populations
Lactation: Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants from eribulin mesylate, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with HALAVEN and for 2 weeks after the final dose.

Hepatic and Renal Impairment: A reduction in starting dose is recommended for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and/or moderate or severe renal impairment.

For more information about HALAVEN, click here for the full Prescribing Information.

HALAVEN is a registered trademark used by Eisai Inc. under license from Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.

Amphivena Presents Data from First-in-Human Study of AMV564 in Solid Tumor Patients at the ASCO Virtual Annual Meeting 2020

On May 29, 2020 Amphivena Therapeutics, a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company focused on developing immunotherapeutics that restore anti-cancer immunity to the patient, reported data from a Phase 1 study of its lead clinical candidate AMV564 in a poster presentation at the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Virtual Annual Meeting (Press release, Amphivena Therapeutics, MAY 29, 2020, View Source [SID1234558758]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The Phase 1 dose escalation study (NCT04128423) has enrolled 18 advanced solid tumor patients at the time of data cut off. AMV564 was administered once daily via subcutaneous injection, either alone or in combination with pembrolizumab for 2 weeks out of every 3-week cycle.

AMV564 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities reported in monotherapy or combination therapy cohorts. Assessment of the pharmacodynamic effects of AMV564 using patient blood samples at various timepoints demonstrated depletion of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and increases in CD8:Treg ratio with AMV564 treatment.

AMV564 demonstrated single-agent activity including one complete response in a patient with heavily pre-treated (including prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy) ovarian cancer, who remains on study after 10 cycles of treatment. The disease control rates for the monotherapy and combination arms were 45 percent and 29 percent, respectively.

Details of the Presentation:

Title: A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the T-cell Engager AMV564 Alone and in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors
Authors: Starodub, A. et al.
Abstract Number: 3101 (Poster: 165)

The full abstract and poster will be available on ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) conference and Amphivena websites as of 8:00AM ET on Friday, May 29th.

About AMV564

AMV564 relieves immune suppression via targeted depletion of MDSC and drives T cell activation and polarization to restore anti-cancer immunity. To date, over 80 patients have received AMV564 across three Phase 1 clinical trials for patients with solid tumors, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).