New Data from Foundation Medicine and Collaborators Supports Use of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling to Inform Therapeutic Choices in Advanced Breast Cancer

On June 6, 2016 Foundation Medicine, Inc. (NASDAQ:FMI) reported new data in two presentations at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2016 that underscore the critical importance of integrating comprehensive genomic profiling into clinical care programs for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (Press release, Foundation Medicine, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513069]). Data presented from two separate studies showed:

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Molecular information elucidated from FoundationOne led physicians to change their recommended course of therapy for 41 percent of patient cases;
77 percent of patients profiled with FoundationOne harbored an alteration matched to an FDA-approved therapy;
98 percent of patients with advanced breast cancer had genomic alterations that matched therapeutics being studied in clinical trials; and
20 percent of advanced breast cancers possess high tumor mutational burden, suggesting a potential role for FoundationOne as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibition.
"It’s no longer sufficient to classify or treat breast cancer as a single disease, and we must continue to acknowledge and understand its vast, complex genomic variability in order to provide individuals with every opportunity for improved outcomes," said Vincent Miller, M.D., chief medical officer, Foundation Medicine. "In a striking example of the importance of genomic information in breast cancer treatment, data presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) show that comprehensive genomic profiling led to physician-recommended therapy changes, matches with FDA-approved therapeutic agents that otherwise may have been overlooked or missed, and links to clinical trials for investigational targeted agents. This data is significant for the approximately 40,000 individuals in the United States who present with metastatic breast cancer annually, and it underscores opportunity with precision medicine to improve outcomes by matching patients with the right therapies."

Key Data Highlights:

The poster "Decision impact analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in advanced breast cancer: A prospective study," presented by Raquel E. Reinbolt, M.D., assistant professor, internal medicine, college of medicine, The Ohio State University, presented data that demonstrated that comprehensive genomic profiling in advanced breast cancer provides therapy or clinical trial recommendations for more than 70 percent of patients screened. A prospective, single center, single arm study enrolled advanced breast cancer patients who were within 10 weeks of starting therapy and who had an estimated survival of ≥ 3 months. Key findings include:

Comprehensive genomic profiling noted the existence of an FDA approved drug for 77 of 83 patients, with everolimus (n=72), temsirolimus (n=70), ponatinib (n=23) and pazopanib (n=20) being the most frequently selected by physicians
At least one clinical trial was identified for 98 percent of patients
A change in therapy was recommended by the treating physician for 34 of 83 patients (41 percent), and of these, 17 patients (50 percent) pursued the suggested treatment
A second poster "Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Metastatic Breast Cancer: PD-L1 Protein Expression, PD-L1 Gene Amplification and Total Mutational Burden," presented by Jeffrey S. Ross, M.D., medical director, Foundation Medicine and Chair of the Department of Pathology, Albany Medical College, studied potential predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in more than 6,000 breast cancer tumor samples at Foundation Medicine, and 84 breast cancer cases at Albany Medical Center. In the study, comprehensive genomic profiling using FoundationOne was performed on a cohort of 6,751 metastatic breast cancer tumor samples which were also evaluated for tumor mutational burden. PD-L1 expression detected by immunohistochemistry was used to predict patient survival in the 84 case Albany Medical Center cohort.

Key findings include:

PD-L1 protein expression in infiltrating immunocytes was found to be a significant favorable prognostic factor, which significantly correlated with increased overall survival whereas lack of PD-L1 staining in both tumor cells and immunocytes was a significant adverse prognostic factor associated with decreased patient survival
PD-L1 gene amplification was identified in only 57 of 6,751 (0.1 percent) metastatic breast cancer tumor samples, correlating with the potential for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
High tumor mutational burden was found in 1,351 of 6,643 (20 percent) metastatic breast cancer cases underscoring the potential for further studies measuring tumor mutational burden with FoundationOne to identify breast cancer patients as candidates for immunotherapy
Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women in the United States, excluding non-melanoma cancers of the skin. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 246,660 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in 20161. Although the majority of these patients will be cured of their disease in the primary treatment setting, the more than 40,000 cases of relapsed and metastatic breast cancer make this disease the second leading cause of death from cancer in American women2. The matching of patients with advanced breast cancer to personalized therapies holds significant promise to improving clinical outcomes for these patients.

Five Prime Therapeutics Presents Updated Data from Phase 1 trial of Single-Agent FPA144 at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 6, 2016 Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:FPRX), a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on discovering and developing innovative immuno-oncology protein therapeutics, reported that updated data from the ongoing Phase 1 trial of FPA144 was featured today in an oral presentation during the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago (Press release, Five Prime Therapeutics, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513068]). Dr. Jeeyun Lee from the Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, gave the presentation, titled Antitumor Activity and Safety of FPA144, an ADCC-enhanced, FGFR2b Isoform-Selective Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with FGFR2b+ Gastric Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors (Abstract 2502). The presentation is available on the Five Prime website: View Source

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Part 1 of the trial evaluated escalating doses of FPA144 as a single agent in 27 patients, 19 with advanced solid tumors in Part 1a and 8 with advanced gastric cancer in Part 1b, including 6 with FGFR2b-overexpressing tumors. Enrollment is underway in Part 2 of the trial, evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy (objective response rate and duration of response) of biweekly 15 mg/kg infusions of FPA144 across multiple cohorts: gastric cancer patients whose tumors have high, moderate and low levels of FGFR2b protein overexpression and gastric cancer patients whose tumors do not have FGFR2b protein overexpression. Five Prime plans to expand the scope of this trial further by the end of 2016 to include a cohort of patients with a tumor type (other than gastric) that overexpresses FGFR2b.

Safety findings presented in this update are consistent with initial data presented during the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Gastrointestinal Symposium in January 2016. Data across 40 patients in the full safety population of this trial (all gastric and solid tumor patients receiving any portion of at least one dose of FPA144) suggest that FPA144 has an acceptable safety profile in doses up to 15 mg/kg:

No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs); maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached
No treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs); 17 reported SAEs across 9 patients
No treatment-related adverse events (AEs) resulting in treatment discontinuation
No treatment-related hyperphosphatemia or retinal toxicity (differentiated from small molecule kinase inhibitors targeting FGF receptor tyrosine kinases)
The most common treatment-related AEs ( > 5%) were all grades 1 or 2: fatigue (22.5%), nausea (20%) and vomiting (12.5%)
One transient treatment-related Grade 3 AE of decreased neutrophil count
Comparable safety between gastric cancer patients and full safety population

FPA144 monotherapy demonstrated early evidence of anti-tumor efficacy in the 9 gastric cancer patients with FGFR2b protein overexpression (6 from Part 1b of the trial; 3 from Part 2) that were available for analysis as of the April 1, 2016 data cutoff. These patients were heavily pre-treated, having received between 1 and 6 prior therapies with a median of 2 prior therapies. The activity observed includes:

3 confirmed partial responses (PRs) out of 9 gastric cancer patients treated (33%) (one of these three PRs confirmed after the April 1, 2016 data cutoff)
7 of 9 gastric cancer patients with disease control (3 PRs + 4 stable disease), disease control rate (DCR) = 77%
12-week progression-free survival (PFS) in 6 of 9 gastric cancer patients (67%)
Median duration of treatment of 112 days (range 42-182 days), with 2 of 9 gastric cancer patients still on study
1 complete response (CR) in a patient with metastatic bladder cancer
In addition to the 3 PRs noted above, there was an additional unconfirmed PR in the 10th gastric cancer patient with FGFR2b protein overexpression (the 4th patient in the 15 mg/kg cohort). This 10th patient’s scan became available after the data cutoff of April 1, 2016, and the patient remains on treatment.

"The data suggest that FPA144 is an active drug that warrants further clinical development. The initial single-agent efficacy and safety data seen during the dose escalation portion of the study is encouraging," said Dr. Charles Fuchs, Director of the Center for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Dana Farber Cancer Institute. "Patients with advanced gastric cancer have a significant unmet medical need, and the literature suggests that those with tumors that overexpress FGFR2b have an even worse prognosis. New treatments options are needed for these patients."

"We are pleased with the data from this ongoing trial," said Lewis T. "Rusty" Williams, M.D., Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of Five Prime. "The data we have observed in this trial suggest that FPA144 has an acceptable safety profile and can be dosed biweekly. FPA144 monotherapy also showed evidence of clinical activity in the first nine FGFR2b+ gastric cancer patients that were available for analysis, with a disease control rate of 77% and a 12-week progression free survival of 67%. We were also pleased to see an unexpected complete response in a patient with bladder cancer in part 1a of the trial. We look forward to continuing the study and to further exploring FPA144 in gastric cancer with varying levels of FGFR2b protein overexpression as well as additional FGFR2b+ tumors."

About the FPA144 Phase 1 Trial
Parts 1a and 1b of the Phase 1 study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of escalating doses of FPA144 in 27 patients with solid tumors, including gastric cancer patients. Enrollment is underway in Part 2 of the trial, evaluating the safety, PK and efficacy (response rate and duration of response) of biweekly 15 mg/kg infusions of FPA144 across multiple cohorts: gastric cancer patients with high, moderate and low levels of FGFR2b protein overexpression, FGFR2b- gastric cancer patients, and FGFR2b+ patients with other tumor types. Up to 30 patients may be enrolled in each tumor setting. Tumors will be biopsied pre- and post-treatment in order to determine levels of FGFR2b protein overexpression and FGFR2 gene amplification, and to detect PD-L1 and immune infiltrate changes within the tumor. Testing for FGFR2b protein overexpression is being conducted centrally, using a proprietary immunohistochemistry assay.

About FPA144
FPA144 is an anti-FGF receptor 2b (FGFR2b) humanized monoclonal antibody in clinical development as a targeted immune therapy for tumors that over-express FGFR2b, as determined by a proprietary immunohistochemistry (IHC) diagnostic assay. FGFR2 gene amplification (as identified by FISH) is found in a number of tumors, including in approximately 5% of gastric cancer patients, and is associated with poor prognosis.

FPA144 is designed to block tumor growth through two distinct mechanisms. First, it has been engineered to drive immune-based killing of tumor cells by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and the recruitment of natural killer (NK) cells and T cells. Second, it binds specifically to FGFR2b and prevents the binding of certain fibroblast growth factors that promote tumor growth. When combined with PD-1 blockade, FPA144 has shown an additive effect in tumor growth inhibition in preclinical models. Five Prime retains global development and commercialization rights to FPA144.

8-K – Current report

On June 6, 2016 Bio-Path Holdings, Inc., (NASDAQ: BPTH), a biotechnology company leveraging its proprietary DNAbilize liposomal delivery and antisense technology to develop a portfolio of targeted nucleic acid cancer and autoimmune drugs, reported that data from the Phase I study of BP1001 (Liposomal Grb2 Antisense) as a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the safety segment of the Phase II combination therapy of BP1001 and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) as a treatment for advanced AML were presented by Dr. Maro Ohanian, Assistant Professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, during a poster presentation at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in a poster titled, "Phase I Study of BP1001 (Liposomal Grb2 Antisense) in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies (Filing, 8-K, Bio-Path Holdings, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513067])."

"While a small dataset, we are still very excited by these robust data showing that five of six evaluable patients demonstrated activity, especially for these refractory and resistant patients. We are also encouraged by the lack of toxicity as our Phase II efficacy segment will be in de novo fragile patients, for whom the drug side effect profile is particularly important," stated Peter H. Neilson, Chief Executive Officer of Bio-Path Holdings. "In addition, we were very pleased with BP1001’s pharmacokinetics, particularly its 30-hour half-life. The final analysis of these data, along with the demonstrated reductions in bone marrow blasts, suggests that 60 mg/m2 is the appropriate dose going forward."

The Phase I study of BP1001 comprised Cohorts 1 through 6 of the dose-finding monotherapy at doses up to 90 mg/m2 in refractory/relapsed leukemia patients. The safety segment of the Phase II study evaluated the toxicity of BP1001 in Cohorts 7 and 8 in doses of 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, combined with LDAC chemotherapy in refractory/relapsed patients with advanced AML.

Data from the safety segment of the Phase II combination therapy of BP1001 and LDAC showed no dose limiting toxicities. Of the six evaluable patients, four patients completed more than two cycles of treatment, three patients achieved complete remission and two patients achieved partial remission. BP1001 levels decreased bi-exponentially in plasma and the pharmacokinetics of BP1001 demonstrated a half-life at 60 mg/m2 of 30 hours.

As previously reported, data from the Phase I study demonstrated that BP1001 was well tolerated in refractory/relapsed leukemia patients at doses up to 90 mg/m2 with no drug related adverse events. It also decreased target Grb2 expression by an average of 50% in the 21 evaluable patients on BP1001 monotherapy. Of these patients in the Phase I study, seven patients completed more than two cycles of treatment, 10 patients had more than a 50% reduction in peripheral or bone marrow blasts and six patients had transient decline in blasts (n=3) and/or stable disease (n=3), with two patients experiencing transient improvement in leukemia cutis lesions.

About BP1001

BP1001 is a neutral-charge, liposome-incorporated antisense drug substance designed to inhibit Grb2 protein expression. The protein Grb2 is essential to cancer cell signaling because it is utilized by oncogenic tyrosine kinases to induce cancer progression. Suppressing the function or expression of Grb2 should interrupt its vital signaling function and have a therapeutic application in cancer.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


Array Presents Full Results from Phase 3 NEMO Study

On June 6, 2016 Array BioPharma (Nasdaq: ARRY) reported full results at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago (Abstract No. 9500) from the pivotal Phase 3 NEMO (NRAS MELANOMA AND MEK INHBITOR) trial of binimetinib (Press release, Array BioPharma, JUN 6, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175437 [SID:1234513066]). The study found binimetinib significantly extended median progression-free survival (PFS), the study’s primary endpoint, at 2.8 months, as compared with 1.5 months observed with dacarbazine [hazard ratio (HR)=0.62 (95% CI 0.47-0.80), p<0.001] – the first trial to ever meet a PFS endpoint in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma. In the pre-specified subset of patients who received prior treatment with immunotherapy, including ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab, patients who received binimetinib experienced 5.5 months of median PFS (95% CI, 2.8–7.6), compared with 1.6 months for those receiving treatment with dacarbazine (95% CI, 1.5–2.8).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Array BioPharma. (PRNewsFoto/Array BioPharma Inc.)
"The NEMO findings are promising and suggest binimetinib may provide a new treatment option for the thousands of patients who are diagnosed with NRAS-mutant melanoma," said lead study investigator Reinhard Dummer, M.D., Professor, Dept. of Dermatology, University of Zurich Hospital. "Particularly compelling are the results in the pre-specified sub-group of patients who had received prior treatment with immunotherapy, which is now recognized as the standard of care for first-line treatment in this patient population."

In addition to improving PFS, binimetinib also demonstrated significant improvement in overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). While there was no statistically significant difference demonstrated in overall survival, the median overall survival (mOS) favored the binimetinib arm.

Confirmed ORR was 15 percent (95% CI, 11-20 percent) in patients receiving binimetinib vs. 7 percent (95% CI, 3-13 percent) in patients receiving dacarbazine.
DCR for patients receiving binimetinib was 58 percent (95% CI, 52-64 percent) vs. 25 percent (95% CI, 18-33 percent) for patients receiving dacarbazine.
mOS was estimated at 11.0 months in patients receiving binimetinib vs. 10.1 months for patients treated with dacarbazine [(HR) = 1.0 (95% CI 0.75-1.33), p=0.499].
"NRAS-mutant melanoma impacts one out of five advanced melanoma patients, yet there are currently no treatment options indicated specifically for these patients," said study investigator Keith T. Flaherty, M.D., Director of the Termeer Center for Targeted Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School. "There remains a need for additional effective treatments for patients with NRAS–mutant disease. Binimetinib may provide another important treatment option for this patient population."

Binimetinib was generally well-tolerated and the adverse events (AEs) reported were consistent with previous results in NRAS-mutant melanoma patients. Grade 3/4 AEs reported in greater than or equal to 5 percent of patients receiving binimetinib included increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and hypertension.

"The NEMO trial results demonstrate the potential of binimetinib to help slow disease progression in this patient population, an often overlooked subset without treatment options beyond immunotherapy," explained Victor Sandor, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Array BioPharma. "Based on the strength of these data, we plan to submit our regulatory filing for binimetinib in NRAS-mutant melanoma later this month."

About NEMO
The NEMO trial, (NCT01763164), is an international, randomized Phase 3 study in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma. 402 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive continuous 45 mg BID binimetinib or 1,000 mg/m2 dacarbazine dosed every three weeks. Prior immunotherapy treatment was allowed. The primary endpoint of the study is progression-free survival, and overall survival is a key secondary endpoint. Patients underwent radiographic assessment of disease status every six weeks, and assessment of progression was determined by blinded central review. Over 100 sites across North America, Europe, South America, Asia and Australia participated in the study.

About NRAS-Mutant Melanoma
Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer among men and the seventh most common cancer among women in the United States, with more than 76,000 new cases and nearly 10,000 deaths from the disease projected in 2016. Activating NRAS mutations are present in up to 20 percent of patients with metastatic melanoma, and is a poor prognostic indicator for these patients. Treatment options for this population remain limited beyond immunotherapy, and patients face poor clinical outcomes and high mortality.

About Binimetinib
MEK and BRAF are key protein kinases in the MAPK signaling pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK). Research has shown this pathway regulates several key cellular activities including proliferation, differentiation, survival and angiogenesis. Inappropriate activation of proteins in this pathway has been shown to occur in many cancers, such as melanoma, non-small cell lung, colorectal and thyroid cancers. Binimetinib is a late-stage small molecule MEK inhibitor, which targets key enzymes in this pathway.

Binimetinib is currently being studied in Phase 3 trials in advanced cancer patients, including the COLUMBUS trial studying encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and the recently initiated BEACON trial that will study encorafenib in combination with binimetinib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer. Array projects COLUMBUS top-line results availability during the third quarter of 2016.

New Phase 3 Secondary Analysis Shows Progression-Free Survival Benefit In Early Relapsing Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Kyprolis® (Carfilzomib)-Based Regimen

On June 6, 2016 Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) reported data from a secondary analysis of the pivotal Phase 3 ASPIRE trial that showed Kyprolis (carfilzomib) for Injection in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) compared to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with early disease progression after initial therapy or transplant (Press release, Amgen, JUN 6, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175458 [SID:1234513065]). The results were presented today at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The analysis showed that patients relapsing within one year of initial therapy treated with KRd (n=87) experienced a median PFS of 24.1 months versus 12.5 months in those treated with Rd (n=72) (HR=0.75; 95 percent CI: 0.50-1.13). In addition, ORR in the KRd arm was 79.3 percent versus 61.1 percent in the Rd arm. Patients relapsing early after first prior transplant treated with KRd (n=48) experienced a median PFS of 17.3 months versus 11.1 months in those treated with Rd (n=49) (HR=0.87; 95 percent CI: 0.54-1.41). In addition, the ORR in the KRd arm was 83.3 percent versus 61.2 percent in the Rd arm. Grade 3 adverse events that occurred at least five percent more frequently in the KRd arm compared to the Rd arm in either subgroup were hypokalemia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, hypophosphatemia and respiratory tract infection (ASCO abstract #8045).

"A goal in treating relapsed multiple myeloma is to get patients into remission, and keep them in remission as long as possible. For some patients who relapse early, this may be a sign of a more aggressive disease1," said Sean E. Harper, M.D., executive vice president of Research and Development at Amgen. "This analysis showed that in early relapsing multiple myeloma patients, the addition of Kyprolis to lenalidomide and dexamethasone resulted in patients living longer without their disease progressing, a significant milestone for patients living with this difficult-to-treat disease."

ASCO Abstract #8045: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd) vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM) and Early Progression During Prior Therapy: Secondary Analysis From the Phase 3 Study ASPIRE (NCT01080391)

An exploratory sub-group analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of KRd compared with Rd alone in 159 patients with multiple myeloma who had relapsed less than or equal to one year from their first treatment. A second sub-group analysis examined 97 patients with multiple myeloma who had relapsed less than or equal to one year from prior transplant.

In patients who had relapsed less than or equal to one year from their first treatment, median PFS in the KRd arm was 24.1 months versus 12.5 months for Rd (HR=0.75; 95 percent CI: 0.50-1.13), and ORR was 79.3 percent for KRd versus 61.1 percent for Rd. In addition, 21.8 percent of patients in the KRd arm experienced a complete response versus 4.2 percent treated with Rd.
In patients who had relapsed less than or equal to one year after transplant, median PFS in the KRd arm was 17.3 months versus 11.1 months for Rd (HR=0.87; 95 percent CI: 0.54-1.41), and ORR was 83.3 percent for KRd versus 61.2 percent for Rd. Complete responses in the KRd and Rd arms were 12.5 percent and 4.1 percent, respectively.
Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred in greater than or equal to five percent more frequently in KRd than Rd in both groups were hypokalemia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, hypophosphatemia and respiratory tract infection.
About ASPIRE
The international, randomized Phase 3 ASPIRE (CArfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and DexamethaSone versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the treatment of PatIents with Relapsed Multiple MyEloma) trial evaluated Kyprolis in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone, in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma following treatment with one to three prior regimens. The primary endpoint of the trial was PFS, defined as the time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and safety. Patients were randomized to receive Kyprolis (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle one only, escalating to 27 mg/m2 on days 8, 9, 15 and 16 of cycle one and continuing on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 of subsequent cycles), in addition to a standard dosing schedule of lenalidomide (25 mg per day for 21 days on, 7 days off) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg per week in four-week cycles), versus lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone alone. The study randomized 792 patients at sites in North America, Europe and Israel.

About Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is an incurable blood cancer, characterized by a recurring pattern of remission and relapse.2 It is a rare and very aggressive disease that accounts for approximately one percent of all cancers.2,3 In the U.S., there are nearly 90,000 people living with, or in remission from, multiple myeloma.4 Approximately, 30,330 Americans are diagnosed with multiple myeloma each year and 12,650 patient deaths are reported on an annual basis.5

About Amgen’s Commitment to Oncology
Amgen Oncology is committed to helping patients take on some of the toughest cancers, such as those that have been resistant to drugs, those that progress rapidly through the body and those where limited treatment options exist. Amgen’s supportive care treatments help patients combat certain side effects of strong chemotherapy, and our targeted medicines and immunotherapies focus on more than a dozen different malignancies, ranging from blood cancers to solid tumors. With decades of experience providing therapies for cancer patients, Amgen continues to grow its portfolio of innovative and biosimilar oncology medicines.

About Kyprolis (carfilzomib)
Proteasomes play an important role in cell function and growth by breaking down proteins that are damaged or no longer needed.5 Kyprolis has been shown to block proteasomes, leading to an excessive build-up of proteins within cells.5 In some cells, Kyprolis can cause cell death, especially in myeloma cells because they are more likely to contain a higher amount of abnormal proteins.5,6

Kyprolis is approved in the U.S. for the following:

In combination with dexamethasone or with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three lines of therapy.
As a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one or more lines of therapy.
Kyprolis is also approved in Argentina, Israel, Kuwait, Mexico, Thailand, Colombia, Korea, Canada, Switzerland, Russia and the European Union. Additional regulatory applications for Kyprolis are underway and have been submitted to health authorities worldwide.

Kyprolis is a product of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Onyx Pharmaceuticals is a subsidiary of Amgen and holds development and commercialization rights to Kyprolis globally, excluding Japan.

For more information, please visit www.kyprolis.com.

Important Safety Information Regarding Kyprolis (carfilzomib) for Injection

INDICATIONS

KYPROLIS (carfilzomib) is indicated in combination with dexamethasone or with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three lines of therapy.
KYPROLIS (carfilzomib) is indicated as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one or more lines of therapy.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Cardiac Toxicities

New onset or worsening of pre-existing cardiac failure (e.g., congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, decreased ejection fraction), restrictive cardiomyopathy, myocardial ischemia, and myocardial infarction including fatalities have occurred following administration of KYPROLIS. Some events occurred in patients with normal baseline ventricular function. Death due to cardiac arrest has occurred within one day of KYPROLIS administration.
Monitor patients for clinical signs or symptoms of cardiac failure or cardiac ischemia. Evaluate promptly if cardiac toxicity is suspected. Withhold KYPROLIS for Grade 3 or 4 cardiac adverse events until recovery, and consider whether to restart KYPROLIS at 1 dose level reduction based on a benefit/risk assessment.
While adequate hydration is required prior to each dose in Cycle 1, monitor all patients for evidence of volume overload, especially patients at risk for cardiac failure. Adjust total fluid intake as clinically appropriate in patients with baseline cardiac failure or who are at risk for cardiac failure.
Patients > 75 years, the risk of cardiac failure is increased. Patients with New York Heart Association Class III and IV heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, conduction abnormalities, angina, or arrhythmias may be at greater risk for cardiac complications and should have a comprehensive medical assessment (including blood pressure and fluid management) prior to starting treatment with KYPROLIS and remain under close follow-up.
Acute Renal Failure

Cases of acute renal failure and renal insufficiency adverse events (including renal failure) have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Acute renal failure was reported more frequently in patients with advanced relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who received KYPROLIS monotherapy. Monitor renal function with regular measurement of the serum creatinine and/or estimated creatinine clearance. Reduce or withhold dose as appropriate.
Tumor Lysis Syndrome

Cases of Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS), including fatal outcomes, have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Patients with multiple myeloma and a high tumor burden should be considered at greater risk for TLS. Adequate hydration is required prior to each dose in Cycle 1, and in subsequent cycles as needed. Consider uric acid lowering drugs in patients at risk for TLS. Monitor for evidence of TLS during treatment and manage promptly. Withhold KYPROLIS until TLS is resolved.
Pulmonary Toxicity

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), acute respiratory failure, and acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease such as pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Some events have been fatal. In the event of drug-induced pulmonary toxicity, discontinue KYPROLIS.
Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was reported in patients treated with KYPROLIS. Evaluate with cardiac imaging and/or other tests as indicated. Withhold KYPROLIS for PAH until resolved or returned to baseline and consider whether to restart KYPROLIS based on a benefit/risk assessment.
Dyspnea

Dyspnea was reported in patients treated with KYPROLIS. Evaluate dyspnea to exclude cardiopulmonary conditions including cardiac failure and pulmonary syndromes. Stop KYPROLIS for Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea until resolved or returned to baseline. Consider whether to restart KYPROLIS based on a benefit/risk assessment.
Hypertension

Hypertension, including hypertensive crisis and hypertensive emergency, has been observed with KYPROLIS. Some of these events have been fatal. Monitor blood pressure regularly in all patients. If hypertension cannot be adequately controlled, withhold KYPROLIS and evaluate. Consider whether to restart KYPROLIS based on a benefit/risk assessment.
Venous Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolic events (including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) have been observed with KYPROLIS. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for patients being treated with the combination of KYPROLIS with dexamethasone or with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. The thromboprophylaxis regimen should be based on an assessment of the patient’s underlying risks.
Patients using oral contraceptives or a hormonal method of contraception associated with a risk of thrombosis should consider an alternative method of effective contraception during treatment with KYPROLIS in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.
Infusion Reactions

Infusion reactions, including life-threatening reactions, have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Symptoms include fever, chills, arthralgia, myalgia, facial flushing, facial edema, vomiting, weakness, shortness of breath, hypotension, syncope, chest tightness, or angina. These reactions can occur immediately following or up to 24 hours after administration of KYPROLIS. Premedicate with dexamethasone to reduce the incidence and severity of infusion reactions. Inform patients of the risk and of symptoms of an infusion reaction and to contact a physician immediately if they occur.
Thrombocytopenia

KYPROLIS causes thrombocytopenia with recovery to baseline platelet count usually by the start of the next cycle. Thrombocytopenia was reported in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Monitor platelet counts frequently during treatment with KYPROLIS. Reduce or withhold dose as appropriate.
Hepatic Toxicity and Hepatic Failure

Cases of hepatic failure, including fatal cases, have been reported during treatment with KYPROLIS. KYPROLIS can cause increased serum transaminases. Monitor liver enzymes regularly regardless of baseline values. Reduce or withhold dose as appropriate.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Cases of thrombotic microangiopathy, including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS), including fatal outcome have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Monitor for signs and symptoms of TTP/HUS. Discontinue KYPROLIS if diagnosis is suspected. If the diagnosis of TTP/HUS is excluded, KYPROLIS may be restarted. The safety of reinitiating KYPROLIS therapy in patients previously experiencing TTP/HUS is not known.
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)

Cases of PRES have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. PRES was formerly known as Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome. Consider a neuroradiological imaging (MRI) for onset of visual or neurological symptoms. Discontinue KYPROLIS if PRES is suspected and evaluate. The safety of reinitiating KYPROLIS therapy in patients previously experiencing PRES is not known.
Embryo-fetal Toxicity

KYPROLIS can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman based on its mechanism of action and findings in animals.
Females of reproductive potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant while being treated with KYPROLIS. Males of reproductive potential should be advised to avoid fathering a child while being treated with KYPROLIS. If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if pregnancy occurs while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus.
ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse events occurring in at least 20% of patients treated with KYPROLIS in the combination therapy trials: anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, insomnia, muscle spasm, cough, upper respiratory tract infection, hypokalemia.
The most common adverse events occurring in at least 20% of patients treated with KYPROLIS in monotherapy trials: anemia, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, nausea, pyrexia, dyspnea, diarrhea, headache, cough, edema peripheral.
Please see full Prescribing Information at www.kyprolis.com.