CytRx Presents Updated Aldoxorubicin Clinical Trial Results at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting

On June 6, 2016 CytRx Corporation (NASDAQ: CYTR), a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology, reported the presentation of three posters featuring updated clinical data from its aldoxorubicin clinical trials at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting being held June 3-7, 2016, at McCormick Place in Chicago (Press release, CytRx, JUN 6, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175339 [SID:1234513038]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"The clinical data presented this year at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) continues to support the safety and activity of aldoxorubicin in multiple high unmet need tumor types, including in late-stage and heavily pre-treated patients," commented Daniel Levitt, M.D., Ph.D., CytRx’s Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer. "With over 550 cancer patients treated with aldoxorubicin to date, oncologists are becoming comfortable with the safety and utility profile of the drug."

The details for the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 poster presentations are as follows:

Title: Phase 2 study of aldoxorubicin in relapsed glioblastoma
Date/Time: June 4, 2016 1:00pm-5:00pm
Poster Session: Central Nervous System Tumors; Abstract 2027
Summary: This ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial is evaluating aldoxorubicin in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (GBM). Twenty-eight patients who had prior treatment with surgery, radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled and received either 250mg/m2 or 350mg/m2 of aldoxorubicin once every three weeks. To date, aldoxorubicin has demonstrated anti-tumor activity and appears to be relatively well-tolerated with patients receiving a median of 3 or 4 cycles (range 1-20) depending on the dose group. No evidence of central nervous system toxicity or clinically significant cardiac toxicity has been observed. Best responses in 21 subjects according to MRI were 3 patients with partial response (PR) and 7 patients with stable disease (SD). Additionally, two patients underwent surgery following aldoxorubicin treatment, and the pathology analysis of the removed tissue showed no viable tumor. The median overall survival was 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.8-10.1) with seven patients still on study and being followed.

This study provides the first evidence that aldoxorubicin’s albumin-binding mechanism allows it to cross the blood-brain barrier, unlike doxorubicin, and kill glioblastoma cells. Following the completion of this trial, CytRx will evaluate the clinical path forward for aldoxorubicin as a treatment for advanced GBM.

Title: Phase 1b study of aldoxorubicin + gemcitabine in metastatic solid tumors
Date/Time: June 5, 2016 8:00am-11:30am
Poster Session: Developmental Therapeutics – Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics; Abstract: 2523
Summary: This ongoing Phase 1b study is evaluating aldoxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic solid tumors. To date, 29 heavily pre-treated patients (median prior regimens 3-4; range 0-15) have been enrolled in four different dose combination cohorts. Of 18 evaluable patients, 13 of 18 (72%) had clinical benefit including two partial responses and 11 patients with stable disease. The confirmed partial responses were in a patient with ovarian cancer and a patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Across all dose groups the number of completed cycles range from 1-17, and cumulative doxorubicin exposure ranges from 208mg to 4,103mg. Doses of 200 mg/m2 aldoxorubicin with 500 mg/m2 gemcitabine appears to be best tolerated. Patients continue to be treated in the final dose cohort.

Although patients in this trial had a variety of different types of cancer, the future focus of this combination will be the treatment of ovarian and endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Title: Treatment of HIV-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma with aldoxorubicin
Date/Time: June 6, 2016 8:00am-11:30am
Poster Session: Sarcoma; Abstract: 11038
Summary: This ongoing open-label Phase 2 clinical trial is evaluating the efficacy and safety of low dose aldoxorubicin for the treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) in HIV-infected patients. Fifteen patients have been enrolled and received either 50, 100, or 150 mg/m2 of aldoxorubicin once every three weeks. To date, significant anti-tumor activity has been observed. At these low doses, 11 of 13 (85%) patients have achieved partial responses at cycle 4, and at the end of the study, 8 of 12 (67%) patients have demonstrated partial responses. Two patients continue to be treated. Aldoxorubicin was very well-tolerated in these patients with advanced Kaposi’s sarcoma due to the low doses administered. Importantly, determining the drug concentration within the tumor, a key goal of the trial, was successfully achieved. In 12 of 14 (86%) patients for whom there was adequate tissue for analysis, higher doxorubicin concentrations were detected within the KS lesion relative to non-tumor tissue.

The high level of activity and important tolerability of low dose aldoxorubicin will allow long term usage in this very difficult to treat group of patients.

About Aldoxorubicin
The widely used chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin is delivered systemically and is highly toxic, which limits its dose to a level below its maximum therapeutic benefit. Doxorubicin also is associated with many side effects, especially the potential for damage to heart muscle at cumulative doses greater than 450 mg/m2. Aldoxorubicin combines doxorubicin with a novel single-molecule linker that binds directly and specifically to circulating albumin, the most plentiful protein in the bloodstream. Protein-hungry tumors concentrate albumin, thus increasing the delivery of the linker molecule with the attached doxorubicin to tumor sites. In the acidic environment of the tumor, but not the neutral environment of healthy tissues, doxorubicin is released. This allows for greater doses (3 ½ to 4 times) of doxorubicin to be administered while reducing its toxic side effects. In studies thus far there has been no evidence of clinically significant effects of aldoxorubicin on heart muscle, even at cumulative doses of drug well in excess of 2,000 mg/m2.

Cyclacel Reports Updated Data From Its DNA Damage Response Program on Seliciclib and Sapacitabine Combination in Patients With Solid Tumors at ASCO

On June 06, 2016 Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:CYCC) (NASDAQ:CYCCP) (Cyclacel or the Company), reported updated Phase 1 data from its DNA damage response program evaluating a combination regimen of two Cyclacel product candidates, seliciclib, a cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, and sapacitabine, a nucleoside analogue (Press release, Cyclacel, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513037]). The regimen was orally-administered as sequential (Part 1) or concomitant (Part 2) treatment to 67 heavily-pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors. Antitumor activity was demonstrated in a subgroup of 45 patients with breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancers who tested positive for BRCA mutations (44 germline and 1 sporadic) with a 35.6% disease control rate (1 CR, 5 PR and 10 SD). Treatment durations in responders ranged between 16 and over 240 weeks. No CR or PR was observed in BRCA negative patients. Data were presented at an oral presentation at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are encouraged by the durable responses and stable disease seen with the seliciclib and sapacitabine combination in patients with BRCA mutations, in particular because most were heavily pretreated and many are able to remain on study for extended periods," said Sara M. Tolaney, M.D., M.P.H., Associate Director, Clinical Research, Breast Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston. "Our findings from Parts 1 and 2 of the study have shown that the orally-administered regimen is well tolerated with manageable toxicities. Based on the results, we believe that further clinical evaluation of this combination regimen is warranted. A Part 3 extension of the study is currently enrolling advanced breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations."

"The findings reported in Dr. Tolaney’s presentation show that the combination treatment of seliciclib and sapacitabine is active and tolerable," said Judy Chiao, M.D., Vice President, Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs of Cyclacel. "This clinical observation may be directly related to the drugs interference with the capacity of BRCA-mutated cancer cells to repair and survive sapacitabine-induced breaks in their DNA. If these preliminary findings are confirmed by further data, this regimen may provide an important treatment option for patients with BRCA-mutated cancers."

"The ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) data build on earlier data from our DNA damage response program highlighted by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper) Annual Meeting Program Committee in a 2013 press conference," said Spiro Rombotis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cyclacel. "The updated data support and extend clinical evidence of efficacy with different schedules of the combination in this patient population. We are encouraged with the durability of responses and stable disease, with ongoing responding patients achieving treatment durations exceeding 1 and 4.5 years respectively. We look forward to reporting data from the ongoing Part 3 extension in BRCA positive patients with breast cancer and increasing our understanding of the potential benefits of this differentiated treatment strategy in a targeted patient population with significant unmet medical need."

Results

The trial is a dose escalation study conducted in patients with advanced and incurable solid tumors. The orally-administered regimen consists of sapacitabine administered twice daily for 7 days sequentially followed by seliciclib twice daily for 3 days over a 21 day cycle (Part 1, n=38); and sapacitabine dosed each morning followed by seliciclib each evening, each once daily for 5 days per week for 2 weeks of a 28 day cycle (Part 2, n=29). The primary objective of the trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose with a secondary objective of antitumor activity of the combination. Sixty-seven patients have been treated in Parts 1 and 2 of the study, of which 44 were found to carry BRCA mutations and one a sporadic BRCA mutation.

Best Responses

PART 1 PART 2
BRCA carriers Others BRCA carriers Others
(n=16) (n=22) (n= 28) (n=1)
CR 1 - - -
PR 3 - 2 -
SD 2 6 7 1*
ORR (CR/PR) 25 % 0 % 7 % 0 %
Disease Control (CR/PR/SD) 6 (37.5%) 6 (27.3%) 9 (32.1%) 1 (100.0 %)

* One patient had a sporadic BRCA mutation. CR=complete response, PR=partial response, SD=stable disease.

One CR and five PR were observed in BRCA mutation carriers with breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancers. Treatment durations for the 3 breast/ovarian cancer responders in Part 1 are 54, 93, over 240 weeks and the one breast cancer responder in Part 2 over 76 weeks respectively. Treatment durations for the two pancreatic cancer responders, one each in Parts 1 and 2, are 21 and 16 weeks respectively. Responders included patients who underwent prior treatment with PARP inhibitors and PARP naïve patients. SD was observed in 9 BRCA mutation carriers and 1 sporadic BRCA positive patient with treatment durations ranging from 16 to 88 weeks.

Overall in BRCA positive patients (Parts 1 and 2, n=45), disease control rate is 35.6% and overall response rate (ORR) is 11% (Part 1 ORR 25% and Part 2 7%). The difference in Part 1 and Part 2 ORRs may suggest that the seliciclib dose in the Part 2 schedule may be too low for enhancing the activity of sapacitabine.

Pharmacodynamic effects of the seliciclib and sapacitabine combination were observed in skin biopsies. Part 1 biopsies following treatment showed a 2.3-fold increase in DNA damage induced by sapacitabine, as measured by gamma-H2AX immunohistochemistry. Additional DNA damage occurred after treatment with seliciclib with a 0.58-fold further increase in gamma-H2AX staining.

In Part 1 recommended Phase 2 doses (RP2D) are: sapacitabine 50 mg b.i.d./seliciclib 800 mg b.i.d. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (16%) and elevation in AST (16%). In Part 2 RP2D are: sapacitabine 250 mg q.d./seliciclib 200 mg q.d. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (28%) and elevation in AST (10%). Dose limiting toxicities were reversible elevations in transaminase and bilirubin, neutropenia or febrile neutropenia and pneumonia.

Abstract: 2503
Title: Phase I study of sapacitabine and seliciclib in patients with advanced solid tumors
Date/Time: June 6, 2016 9:00 a.m. — 9:12 a.m. CDT
Location: E354b
Session Title: Developmental Therapeutics—Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Authors: SM Tolaney1, J Hilton1, JM Cleary1, L Gandhi1, EL Kwak1, JW Clark1, A Wolanski1, T Bell1, SJ Rodig3, JH Chiao2, D Blake2, G Shapiro1
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; 2 Cyclacel Ltd, Dundee, United Kingdom; 3 Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.

The abstract can be accessed through the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) website, View Source

About sapacitabine

Sapacitabine is an oral nucleoside analogue prodrug whose metabolite, CNDAC, generates single-strand DNA breaks (SSB), either leading to arrest of the cell cycle at G2 phase or development of double-strand DNA breaks (DSB). CNDAC-induced DSB repair is dependent on homologous recombination (HR). BRCA mutations in cancer cells are a cause of HR deficiency, making them susceptible to cell death induced by sapacitabine. Sapacitabine is the subject of SEAMLESS, a Phase 3 trial, which has completed enrollment and is being conducted under an SPA with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as front-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly. Sapacitabine has been evaluated to date in over 1000 patients including randomized Phase 2 and 3 trials in patients with hematological malignancies and previously treated solid tumors, including lung cancer.

About seliciclib

Seliciclib is an orally-available CDK inhibitor molecule that selectively inhibits enzyme targets, CDK2 and CDK9, which are central to the process of cell growth, survival and cell cycle control. Seliciclib treatment has been reported to inhibit the two major DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), by reducing expression of components of each pathway. It may potentiate the activity of sapacitabine by compromising HR protein expression and activation or by potentiating apoptosis following sapacitabine-induced DNA damage. Seliciclib has been evaluated to date in approximately 450 patients including randomized Phase 2 trials in patients with previously treated lung cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer.

Clovis Oncology Presents Data from Phase 2 Studies of Rucaparib in Advanced Ovarian Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 6, 2016 Clovis Oncology (NASDAQ:CLVS) reported updated phase 2 results from Part 1 of the ongoing ARIEL2 study in patients with advanced ovarian cancer as well as the final results of the RUCAPANC study of rucaparib in pancreatic cancer at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago (Press release, Clovis Oncology, JUN 6, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175294 [SID:1234513036]). Rucaparib is the Company’s oral, potent, small molecule inhibitor of PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3 currently being developed for the treatment of ovarian cancer, specifically in patients with tumors with BRCA mutations and other DNA repair deficiencies beyond BRCA, including those with high genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) also known as "BRCA-like."

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are pleased to present our mature dataset from Part 1 of the ARIEL2 study for rucaparib in ovarian cancer at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper), which demonstrates its encouraging clinical activity in selected patients and its potential in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer," said Patrick J. Mahaffy, CEO and President of Clovis Oncology. "We are also encouraged by the results of the RUCAPANC study of rucaparib in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with mutations of BRCA, and look forward to exploring rucaparib in additional tumor types in which mutations in BRCA and other DNA repair deficiencies play a significant role."

Study objectives of the global, two-part single-arm open-label ARIEL2 trial in patients with advanced ovarian cancer include determining rucaparib activity in prospectively defined molecular subgroups through the assessment of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumors that have germline and somatic BRCA mutations, those with a BRCA-like signature (patients whose tumors have other DNA repair deficiencies, including those with high genomic LOH but with normal BRCA genes (BRCAwt/LOHhigh)), and patients whose tumors are biomarker negative (those with low genomic LOH, or BRCAwt/LOHlow). Objective response rate (ORR), safety and pharmacokinetics were also analyzed. Patients in ARIEL2 were treated with the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 600mg twice daily (BID). ARIEL2 Part 1 was initiated in October 2013 and completed enrollment in 2014. At the data cutoff date of January 18, 2016, 28 of the 204 patients enrolled in ARIEL2 Part 1 remained on study. These patients were required to be platinum-sensitive for enrollment and received a median of one prior treatment regimen and a median of one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Enrollment continues for ARIEL2 Part 2, which expanded the ARIEL2 study in early 2015 into up to 300 additional patients with recurrent disease after at least three prior lines of chemotherapy. Enrollment into ARIEL2 Part 2 is not limited to platinum-sensitive disease, but also includes patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory disease. Presentation of ARIEL2 Part 2 data will follow at a future medical meeting.

A NGS-based assay developed with Foundation Medicine, Inc. was used to determine the percentage of genomic LOH, mutations in BRCA, and other homologous recombination genes in archival tumor tissue and pretreatment biopsies for patients enrolled in ARIEL2. A prespecified cutoff of ≥14% for LOHhigh was determined through analysis of microarray and survival data for patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas who had ovarian carcinoma and had received platinum-based chemotherapy. A planned post hoc analysis using outcome data from ARIEL2 Part 1 was performed to refine the genomic cutoff. The data for both the prespecified and refined cutoff percentages are presented in today’s poster presentation.

Updated Results of ARIEL2 Part 1
Data presented from the ARIEL2 Part 1 study demonstrated clinical activity in patients with tumors with germline and somatic BRCA mutations as well as those with tumors classified as BRCAwt/LOHhigh.

Using the prespecified ≥14% cutoff, patients in the BRCAmut subgroup demonstrated a 73 percent reduction in the risk of progression, and patients in the BRCAwt/LOHhigh subgroup demonstrated a 38 percent reduction in the risk of progression, both compared to the BRCAwt/LOHlow subgroup (hazard ratio: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.44; p<0.001] and hazard ratio: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.90; p=0.01], respectively). Median PFS for the BRCAmut, BRCAwt/LOHhigh, and BRCAwt/LOHlow subgroups was 12.8 months, 5.7 months and 5.2 months, respectively.

An analysis of platinum-sensitive patients from ARIEL2 Part 1 identified a refined LOH cutoff of ≥16% that provided further discrimination of PFS, objective response rate and duration of response in patients with LOHhigh and LOHlow tumors who received a median of one prior treatment regimen. Using the refined LOH cutoff of ≥16%, patients in the BRCAmut subgroup demonstrated a 75 percent reduction in the risk of progression, and patients in the BRCAwt/LOHhigh subgroup demonstrated a 49 percent reduction in the risk of progression, both compared to the BRCAwt/LOHlow subgroup (hazard ratio: 0.25 [95% CI: 0.15, 0.42; p<0.001] and hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.34, 0.74; p<0.001], respectively). Median PFS for the BRCAmut, BRCAwt/LOHhigh, and BRCAwt/LOHlow subgroups was 12.8 months, 7.2 months and 5.0 months, respectively.

The confirmed investigator-assessed ORR based on RECIST criteria was significantly higher in the BRCAmut subgroup than in the BRCAwt/LOHlow with the prespecified LOH cutoff. As expected, the most robust clinical responses were observed in patients with tumor (germline and somatic) BRCA mutations: 80 percent (32/40) of BRCAmut patients achieved a response. Responses were observed in both germline and somatic BRCAmut tumors, including 85 percent (17/20) of patients with a gBRCA mutation and 74 percent (14/19) of patients with a sBRCA mutation. One patient with a BRCA mutation was indeterminate for mutation type. In the BRCAwt/LOHhigh subgroup, the ORR was 29 percent (24/82) and 33 percent (23/69) based on the prespecified and refined cutoff, respectively. In the BRCAwt/LOHlow subgroup, the ORR was 10 percent for both the prespecified and refined cutoffs, representing responses in 7 of 70 and 8 of 83 patients, respectively. Median duration of response for the prespecified and refined LOH cutoffs for the BRCAmut and BRCAwt/LOHhigh subgroups were the same at 9.2 months and 10.8 months, respectively, and highly similar for the BRCAwt/LOHlow subgroup at 5.6 months and 5.5 months, respectively.

The most common treatment-emergent AEs reported in ≥20 percent of all patients included nausea (80%), asthenia/fatigue (78%), constipation (46%), vomiting (44%) and dysgeusia (43%). These events were mostly Grade 1/2. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs were anemia/decreased hemoglobin (21%) and ALT/AST elevations (12%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Nineteen patients (9%) discontinued treatment because of an adverse event.

These results support the predictive utility of an HRD signature to identify patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer who may benefit from rucaparib treatment. The NGS-based HRD assay will be prospectively applied to assess the utility of a rucaparib treatment-based LOHhigh cutoff in predicting response to rucaparib in the phase 3 ARIEL3 study investigating rucaparib in the maintenance setting in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Feasibility of Monitoring Response to Rucaparib with ctDNA
A study at the University of Cambridge was conducted to assess TP53 mutant allele fraction (MAF) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from a subset of 18 patients in ARIEL2 Part 1 and will be presented in a poster session this afternoon. Plasma samples were collected from 18 patients in the ARIEL2 Part 1 study during screening, on day 1 of each cycle, and at the end of rucaparib treatment. The objective was to assess monitoring responses to rucaparib with targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) of ctDNA. Seven of 9 patients with a >50% reduction of TP53 MAF in ctDNA at cycle 2 achieved a RECIST PR; this included 5/6 patients with either a germline or somatic BRCA mutation. No patients with a <50% reduction at cycle 2 (n=5) achieved a RECIST response. TADS detected different types of TP53 mutation in plasma including substitutions (n=12) and indels (n=6) across a wide spectrum of allele fractions (0.01–42.3%) with 100% concordance for TP53 mutation status in matched tumor-plasma samples. ctDNA is a potential biomarker for monitoring responses to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.

Final Results of RUCAPANC
The open-label phase 2 RUCAPANC study investigated the safety and efficacy of rucaparib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and a known deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutation and final results were presented in a poster session on June 4. A total of 19 patients were enrolled and received one or more doses of rucaparib, with a median of three cycles (range 1-18) of treatment started. The confirmed investigator-assessed ORR based on RECIST criteria was 16%, in which two partial responses (PR) and one complete response (CR) were observed. The disease control rate was 32% for all patients (6/19) and 50% for patients with one prior chemotherapy (3/6). All three patients with a confirmed response received only one prior line of therapy. Common treatment-emergent AEs included nausea (63%) and anemia (47%). These findings are expected to inform future rucaparib study designs in patients with advanced BRCAmut pancreatic cancer.

About Rucaparib Clinical Development
The ARIEL (Assessment of Rucaparib in Ovarian Cancer Trial) program is a novel, integrated translational-clinical program designed to accurately and prospectively identify ovarian cancer patients with tumor genotypes associated with benefit from rucaparib therapy.

ARIEL2 is a two-part single-arm open label study. Part 1 is in platinum-sensitive patients designed to identify pre-specified tumor characteristics that predict sensitivity to rucaparib using DNA sequencing to evaluate each patient’s tumor and updated results are described above. Part 2, also referred to as the ARIEL2 Extension, is enrolling up to 300 patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have received at least three prior chemotherapy regimens and includes platinum-sensitive, -resistant and -refractory patients. It will evaluate clinical response in patients classified into molecularly-defined subgroups, including gBRCA-mutant, sBRCA-mutant and the BRCA-like signature by a prospectively defined genomic signature.
The phase 2 portion of Study 10, the initial dose finding study, enrolled patients with relapsed, high-grade ovarian cancer associated with a deleterious germline BRCA mutation who have received 2-4 prior lines of chemotherapy.
The ARIEL3 pivotal study is a randomized, double-blind study comparing the effects of rucaparib against placebo to evaluate whether rucaparib given as a maintenance therapy to platinum-sensitive patients can extend the period of time for which the disease is controlled after a positive outcome with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients are randomized to receive either placebo or rucaparib and the primary endpoint of the study is PFS. The primary efficacy analysis will evaluate, in a step-down process, BRCA-mutant patients, all patients with a BRCA-like signature (including BRCA and non-BRCA), and then all patients.
The ARIEL4 confirmatory study is expected to begin during the second half of 2016, and will compare treatment with rucaparib vs chemotherapy in relapsed ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutations. The primary endpoint of the study is PFS.
In addition to the ARIEL program in ovarian cancer, the Company is exploring rucaparib in other solid tumor types with significant BRCA and BRCA-like populations, including a pivotal prostate cancer study expected to initiate during the second half of 2016.
Multiple combination studies are planned to initiate in the second half of 2016, including with inhibitors of PD-L1.
For more information, please visit www.arielstudy.com.
Subgroup analysis of later-line BRCA-mutant patients from ARIEL2 Parts 1 and 2 and Study 10 will form the basis of rucaparib’s rolling New Drug Application (NDA) to the U.S. FDA. The NDA submission will include platinum-sensitive, -resistant and -refractory patients from ARIEL2 Part 2, in addition to the platinum-sensitive patients from ARIEL2 Part 1 and Study 10.

The NDA submission is expected to complete by the end of Q2 2016, and a European Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency is planned for Q4 2016. Rucaparib was granted Breakthrough Therapy designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in April 2015.

Presentation Details
The poster presentation, titled "RUCAPANC: An open-label, phase 2 trial of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC) and a known deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutation" was presented Saturday by Robert Vonderheide, MD, D. Phil., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA during the Poster Session titled "Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer", from 8:00am-11:30am CDT (Abstract 4110; Poster Board #102).

The poster presentation, titled "Refinement of prespecified cutoff for genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in ARIEL2 part 1: A phase II study of rucaparib in patients (pts) with high grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC)" is being presented today by Robert L. Coleman, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX during the Poster Session titled "Gynecologic Cancers" from 1:00pm-4:30pm CDT (Abstract 5540 Poster Board #363).

The poster presentation, titled "Feasibility of monitoring response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib with targeted deep sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in women with high grade serous carcinoma on the ARIEL2 trial" is being presented today by Mitch Raponi, D. Phil, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Clovis Oncology on behalf of the author, Anna Piskorz, PhD, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge during the Poster Session titled "Gynecologic Cancers" from 1:00pm-4:30pm CDT (Abstract 5549 Poster Board #372).

The poster presentations will be available online at View Source as of the time of their scheduled presentation at the meeting.

About Rucaparib
Rucaparib is an oral, potent small molecule inhibitor of PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3 being developed for the treatment of ovarian cancer, specifically in patients with tumors with BRCA mutations and other DNA repair deficiencies beyond BRCA, including those with high genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) commonly referred to as "BRCA-like." Clovis is also exploring rucaparib in other solid tumor types with significant BRCA and BRCA-like populations, including prostate, breast and gastroesophageal cancers. Rucaparib was granted Breakthrough Therapy designation by the U.S. FDA in April 2015. Clovis holds worldwide rights for rucaparib.

Celator Pharmaceuticals® Presented Phase 3 Trial Results in Patients with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Demonstrating VYXEOS™ (CPX-351) Significantly Improved Overall Survival

On June 6, 2016 Celator Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: CPXX) reported results from its Phase 3 trial of VYXEOS (cytarabine: daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection (also known as CPX-351) in patients with high-risk (secondary) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 Annual Meeting (Press release, Celator Pharmaceuticals, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513035]). As previously reported, the trial met its primary endpoint demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in overall survival. The Phase 3 trial compared to the standard of care regimen of cytarabine and daunorubicin known as 7+3.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The median overall survival for patients treated with VYXEOS in the study was 9.56 months compared to 5.95 months for patients receiving 7+3, representing a 3.61 month improvement in favor of VYXEOS. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0.69 (p=0.005) which represents a 31% reduction in the risk of death versus 7+3. The percentage of patients alive 12 months after randomization was 41.5% on the VYXEOS arm compared to 27.6% on the 7+3 arm. The percentage of patients alive 24 months after randomization was 31.1% on the VYXEOS arm compared to 12.3% on the 7+3 arm.

Event-free survival was also statistically significant in favor of VYXEOS. The HR was 0.74 (p-value=0.021). The median event-free survival was 2.53 months in the VYXEOS arm compared to 1.31 months in the 7+3 arm.

"We believe the promising primary efficacy results of CPX-351 in high risk AML, across multiple parameters, support its use as the new standard of care in a difficult-to-treat population," said Jeffrey E. Lancet, M.D., senior member and chief of the Leukemia/Myelodysplasia Program at Moffitt Cancer Center and the principal investigator for the study. "This is an important step forward in the treatment of a terrible disease, and hopefully this platform for synergistic drug delivery will continue to advance the field."

VYXEOS also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in induction response rate (CR+CRi of 47.7% versus 33.3%; p=0.016) and this significance was maintained for the analysis of CR alone (CR of 37.3% versus 25.6%, p=0.040).

Thirty-four percent of VYXEOS treated patients received a stem cell transplant (SCT) compared to 25% of 7+3 treated patients. In a landmark survival analysis of patients receiving a SCT, VYXEOS patients had significantly improved survival post-transplant (HR was 0.46 (p-value=0.0046)). The median overall survival had not been reached in the VYXEOS treated patients compared to 10.25 months in the 7+3 treated patients.

Thirty-day and sixty-day all-cause mortality favored VYXEOS. Thirty-day mortality was 5.9% compared to 10.6% and sixty-day mortality was 13.7% versus 21.2%.

Grade 3-5 non-hematologic and hematologic adverse events were similar between the VYXEOS and 7+3 arms.

The company expects to submit a New Drug Application (NDA) for VYXEOS with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the end of the third quarter of 2016 and submit a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the first quarter of 2017.

"We are very pleased to have this opportunity to share the data from our Phase 3 trial with the oncology community. This successful outcome represents an important advance for AML patients, their families and clinicians," said Scott Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of Celator Pharmaceuticals. "We thank the patients and investigators who participated in this study and we will work closely with regulatory authorities to make this new treatment available to the AML community as soon as possible."

The clinical trial was conducted in partnership with The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) through its Therapy Acceleration Program (TAP), which has supported the clinical development of VYXEOS beginning in Phase 2.

Phase 3 Trial Design

The randomized, controlled, Phase 3 trial (Protocol NCT01696084), enrolled 309 patients at 39 sites in the United States and Canada, and compared VYXEOS to the conventional cytarabine and daunorubicin treatment regimen (commonly referred to as 7+3) as first-line therapy in older (60-75 years of age) patients with high-risk (secondary) AML. Patients were stratified for age (60 to 69 and 70 to 75 years of age) and AML type; treatment-related AML, AML with documented history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior treatment with hypomethylating agent therapy, AML with documented history of MDS without prior hypomethlyating agent therapy, AML with a documented history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL), and de novo AML with a karyotype characteristic of MDS.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either VYXEOS or 7+3. Patients could receive one or two inductions, and responding patients could receive one or two consolidations. First induction for VYXEOS was 100u/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 by 90-minute infusion and for the control arm was cytarabine 100mg/m2/day by continuous infusion for 7 days and daunorubicin 60mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 (7+3). Second induction for VYXEOS-treated patients was 100u/m2 on days 1 and 3, and the control arm was cytarabine 100mg/m2/day by continuous infusion for 5 days and daunorubicin 60mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 (5+2).

Only patients with documented CR or CRi were eligible to receive chemotherapy consolidation. Consolidation for VYXEOS-treated patients was 65u/m2 on days 1 and 3 and the control arm was cytarabine 100mg/m2/day by continuous infusion for 5 days and daunorubicin 60mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 (5+2).

About VYXEOS

VYXEOS (cytarabine:daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection, also known as CPX-351, is a nano-scale co-formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin at a synergistic 5:1 molar ration. VYXEOS represents a novel approach to developing combinations of drugs in which molar ratios of two drugs with synergistic anti-tumor activity are encapsulated in a nano-scale liposome in order to maintain the desired ratio following administration. The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to VYXEOS for the treatment of adults with therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). VYXEOS was granted orphan drug status for the treatment of AML by the FDA and the European Commission. VYXEOS was also granted Fast Track designation for the treatment of elderly patients with secondary AML by the FDA.

About AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly progressing cancer of the blood characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature blast cells in the bone marrow. AML is generally a disease of older adults, and the median age of a patient diagnosed with AML is about 67 years. The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 19,950 new cases of AML and 10,430 deaths from AML in the U.S. in 2016. In Europe the number of new cases is estimated to be 18,000 and in Japan the number is 5,500. The Company estimates that nearly 70 percent of AML patients are over the age of 60, and approximately 75% are intermediate or high risk. Furthermore, approximately half of those patients are considered suitable for intensive treatment.

Even with current treatment, overall survival for AML is poor. In patients over 60 years of age, the 5 year survival rate is less than 10%. In high-risk (secondary) AML, overall survival is lower, resulting in an acute need for new treatment options for these patients.

OncoCyte Presents Positive Bladder Cancer Diagnostic Data at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting

On June 06, 2016 OncoCyte Corporation (NYSE MKT:OCX), a developer of novel, non-invasive tests for the early detection of cancer, reported that it will be presenting data today from a bladder cancer study featured as a poster and also highlighted during a live panel discussion during the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois (Press release, BioTime, JUN 6, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175182 [SID:1234513033]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The poster abstract, entitled Derivation of Gene Expression Classifiers for the Non-invasive Detection of Bladder Cancer in the Hematuria and Recurrence Surveillance Populations, describes OncoCyte’s recent results in the development of a urine-based test for bladder cancer. Dr. Matthew T. Olson, Department of Pathology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, will serve as the presenting author in the live panel discussion. He will be joined by Karen B. Chapman, Ph.D., OncoCyte’s Vice President of Research.

"We are very encouraged by the accuracy of our non-invasive test for the detection of high-grade and low-grade lesions in both the screening (hematuria) and recurrence cohorts. Of particular note, the test was 100 percent accurate in detecting high-grade lesions within the 241 patient group studied." said OncoCyte President & Chief Executive Officer William Annett. "There was also high accuracy in the detection of low-grade lesions, with 77 percent for screening and 75 percent for recurrence. The results warrant a larger study to validate these findings."

The detection of bladder cancer is typically accomplished with a combination of cystoscopy and urine cytology, each with inherent limitations. Urine cytology lacks the desired level of sensitivity, whereas cystoscopy is relatively invasive for routine screening and recurrence surveillance.

OncoCyte’s study developed four gene expression classifiers (GECs) optimized for the non-invasive detection of both high-grade and low-grade urothelial carcinoma in patients presenting with hematuria or for bladder cancer recurrence surveillance. This study included 241 patient urine samples taken at multiple centers. Individual patient results for high-grade and low-grade screening or high-grade and low-grade recurrence can be obtained from a patient’s single urine sample which utilizes two sequential algorithms.

OncoCyte’s approach of sequential GECs optimized for the detection of high-grade and low-grade malignancies provides information to distinguish between these different types of lesions and benign conditions in a non-invasive manner. Low-grade urothelial carcinoma is usually a non-aggressive cancer, whereas high-grade urothelial carcinoma is more aggressive, invasive and causes significantly more cancer-related mortality. The GEC optimized for the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma in patients presenting with hematuria performed with a cross-validated Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) of 0.93, while the low-grade performed with an ROC AUC of 0.81. In the recurrence surveillance cohort, the detection of high-grade performed with an ROC AUC of 0.81 and low-grade with an ROC AUC of 0.64.

ROC AUCs

Low Grade High Grade
Screening (Hematuria) 0.81 0.93

Recurrence 0.64 0.81

"Currently, there is an unmet need for a non-invasive test for bladder cancer for patients requiring recurrence surveillance and for patients presenting with hematuria," added Karen B. Chapman, Ph.D., OncoCyte’s Vice President of Research, who led the study. "These results establish the feasibility of using a non-invasive, urine-based test to detect bladder cancer and also to distinguish between high-grade and low-grade cancers. A multicenter clinical trial will allow us to validate test performance on a larger independent test set of prospectively collected urine samples."

About Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer has been projected to have the highest lifetime treatment costs per patient of all cancers. The high recurrence rate and ongoing invasive monitoring requirements drive the financial burden of this disease. The detection of bladder cancer in hematuria and recurrence patients is routinely accomplished with a combination of urine cytology and cystoscopy which is invasive, and lacks the desired level of sensitivity. Approximately 3 million patients present with hematuria every year in the U.S., of whom about 77,000 are diagnosed with bladder cancer. In addition there are about 587,000 patients in the U.S. living with bladder cancer, and they are candidates for recurrence testing.