Imbruvica®▼ (ibrutinib) Long-Term Data from Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies at ASCO and EHA Demonstrate Sustained Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL)

On June 3, 2019 The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson reported long-term follow-up results from two pivotal Phase 3 studies of Imbruvica (ibrutinib) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the most common form of leukaemia in adults.3 One set of data – results from the RESONATETM study (PCYC-1112) at a median follow-up of 65.3 months (range, 0.3–71.6) – showed treatment with ibrutinib monotherapy sustained progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared to ofatumumab in patients with previously treated CLL, with a median PFS of 44.1 months versus 8.1 months, respectively.1 A consistent PFS benefit with ibrutinib was observed across all baseline disease and patient characteristics, including patients with genomically defined high-risk disease.1 The median overall survival (OS) was 67.7 months in the ibrutinib arm and 65.1 months in the ofatumumab arm, without censoring or adjustment for crossover from ofatumumab to ibrutinib.1 Additionally, no new safety events were identified in this long-term follow-up.1 The RESONATETM results were presented today at the 55th American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago, and selected for the Best of ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2019 Meetings, which highlight cutting-edge science and reflect leading research in oncology (abstract #7510).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The second data set – results from the RESONATETM-2 study (PCYC-1115/1116) at a median follow-up of five years (range, 0.1–66 months) – demonstrated durable PFS with ibrutinib monotherapy (estimate of 70 percent) versus chlorambucil (estimate of 12 percent) in patients with previously untreated CLL, including those with genomically defined high-risk disease.2 The OS benefit was also sustained in patients treated with ibrutinib (estimate of 83 percent) versus chlorambucil (estimate of 68 percent). In addition, no new safety concerns were observed.2 The RESONATETM-2 data will be presented in full during an oral presentation at the 24th European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) Congress in Amsterdam on Friday, June 14 (abstract #S107).2

"Since its first European approval in 2014, ibrutinib has redefined treatment paradigms for CLL, and these study results offer further evidence to both clinicians and patients of the longer-term benefits and tolerability ibrutinib offers as a single agent," said Peter Hillmen, MB ChB, PhD, Professor of Experimental Haematology and Honorary Consultant Haematologist at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom and investigator in both studies. "Not only is superior progression-free survival and overall survival maintained with ibrutinib follow-up, but frequently the quality of response rates improves from partial to complete over time."

"Ibrutinib has already impacted more than 140,000 patients, and the RESONATE and RESONATE-2 long-term follow-up studies provide important data in support of its continued use in the effective management of CLL," said Dr Patrick Laroche, Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Haematology Therapeutic Area Lead, Janssen-Cilag France. "We are excited to explore how best this BTK inhibitor can continue to enhance the lives of people living with CLL, both as a monotherapy and in newer combination regimens, and as an alternative option to intensive chemotherapy."

Ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is jointly developed and commercialised by Janssen Biotech, Inc., and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.

ASCO: RESONATETM six-year follow-up of ibrutinib monotherapy in patients with previously treated CLL (Abstract #7510)1

The RESONATETM (PCYC-1112) study evaluated patients with previously treated CLL who were randomised to receive ibrutinib 420 mg orally once daily until disease progression or intravenous ofatumumab for up to 24 weeks (n=391); 86 percent and 79 percent, respectively, were in the genomically defined high-risk population (17p deletion, 11q deletion, TP53 mutation, and/or unmutated IGHV).1 Long-term efficacy endpoints were investigator-assessed.1

With up to six years of follow-up (median 65.3 months, range, 0.3–71.6 months), extended ibrutinib treatment showed sustained efficacy in patients with previously treated CLL, including patients with high-risk genomic features, with no new safety signals over long-term therapy.1

Of the patients receiving ofatumumab, 68 percent crossed over to receive ibrutinib.1 A statistically significant PFS benefit was sustained with ibrutinib versus ofatumumab, with median PFS of 44.1 months versus 8.1 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.15; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.11–0.20, P˂0.0001), and was consistent across baseline subgroups.1 Median PFS in the genomically defined high-risk population was 44.1 months versus 8.0 months on ibrutinib versus ofatumumab (HR=0.11; 95 percent CI, 0.08–0.15).1

The median OS was 67.7 months in the ibrutinib arm and 65.1 months in the ofatumumab arm, without censoring or adjustment for crossover from ofatumumab to ibrutinib (HR=0.81; 95 percent CI, 0.60-1.09).1 Sensitivity analysis adjusting for crossover based on the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) method also showed continued OS benefit with ibrutinib compared to ofatumumab (HR=0.24; 95 percent CI, 0.11-0.55).1 The overall response rate (ORR) with ibrutinib was 91 percent, with 11 percent achieving a complete response (CR/CR with incomplete blood recovery [CRi]).1 Median treatment duration of ibrutinib was 41 months; 40 percent of patients received ibrutinib for longer than four years.1

The adverse event (AE) profile with ibrutinib remained consistent with prior studies.1 The prevalance of any Grade 3 or higher AEs with ibrutinib decreased after the first year and remained stable thereafter. All Grade and Grade 3 or higher AEs, respectively, included hypertension (21 percent; 9 percent) and atrial fibrillation (12 percent; 6 percent); major haemorrhage occurred in 10 percent.1,4 The most common reasons for ibrutinib discontinuation prior to study closure were progressive disease (37 percent) and AEs (16 percent).1

EHA: RESONATETM-2 five-year follow-up of ibrutinib monotherapy in patients with previously untreated CLL (Abstract #S107)2

The RESONATETM-2 (PCYC-1115/1116) study evaluated patients 65 years or over with previously untreated CLL, without 17p deletion, who received ibrutinib 420 mg orally once-daily continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or chlorambucil 0.5–0.8 mg/kg orally for up to 12 cycles (n=269).2

Results from this five-year follow-up showed ibrutinib monotherapy sustained PFS and OS benefits for patients with CLL versus chlorambucil, including those with high-risk genomic features.2 More than half of patients remain on long-term continuous treatment with ibrutinib. Additionally, no new safety concerns were identified.2

At a median follow-up of 60 months (range, 0.1–66 months), the PFS benefits were sustained in patients treated with ibrutinib (estimate of 70 percent) versus chlorambucil (estimate of 12 percent) (HR=0.15; 95 percent CI, 0.10–0.22).2 The OS benefits were also sustained in patients treated with ibrutinib (estimate of 83 percent) versus chlorambucil (estimate of 68 percent).2 Ibrutinib improved PFS compared with chlorambucil in patients with unmutated IGHV (HR=0.11; 95 percent CI, 0.06–0.19) and in patients with 11q deletion (HR=0.03; 95 percent CI, 0.01–0.11).2 Additionally, 57 percent of patients crossed over from chlorambucil to ibrutinib after progression.2

As a composite, patients with high-risk genomics (unmutated IGHV, 11q deletion, and/or TP53 mutation) had superior outcomes with ibrutinib compared with chlorambucil (PFS: HR=0.08; 95 percent CI, 0.05–0.15; OS: HR=0.37; 95 percent CI, 0.18–0.74).2 With ibrutinib, the ORR including partial response with lymphocytosis was 92 percent and the CR/CRi rate increased over time to 30 percent (from 11 percent CR/CRi at primary analysis at median follow-up of 18 months).2

The most common Grade 3 or higher AEs included neutropenia (13 percent), pneumonia (12 percent), hypertension (8 percent), anaemia (7 percent), hyponatremia (6 percent), atrial fibrillation (5 percent), and cataract (5 percent), with rates of most events decreasing over time.2 Dose reductions due to Grade 3 or higher AEs decreased over time. Benefit with ibrutinib treatment continued in 58 percent of patients who remained on therapy at the time of this analysis.2

#ENDS#

About ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, which works by forming a strong covalent bond with BTK to block the transmission of cell survival signals within the malignant B-cells.5 By blocking this BTK protein, ibrutinib decreases survival and migration of B lymphocytes, thereby delaying the progression of the cancer.6

Ibrutinib is currently approved in Europe for:7

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): As a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated CLL, and as a single agent or in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for the treatment of adult patients with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy.
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): Adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM): Adult patients who have received at least one prior therapy or in first-line treatment for patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.
Ibrutinib is approved in more than 90 countries, and, to date, has been used to treat more than 140,000 patients worldwide across its approved indications.

The most common adverse reactions seen with ibrutinib include diarrhoea, neutropenia, haemorrhage (e.g., bruising), musculoskeletal pain, nausea, rash, and pyrexia.7

For a full list of side effects and information on dosage and administration, contraindications and other precautions when using ibrutinib please refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics for further information.

CEL-SCI Corporation to Present at the 9th Annual LD Micro Invitational

On June 3, 2019 CEL-SCI Corporation (NYSE American: CVM), a Phase 3 cancer immunotherapy company, reported that it will be presenting at the 9th annual LD Micro Invitational on Tuesday, June 4th at 10:40 a.m. PT. Geert Kersten, Chief Executive Officer of CEL-SCI, will be giving the presentation (Press release, Cel-Sci, JUN 3, 2019, View Source [SID1234536837]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Mr. Kersten’s presentation will be webcast and available in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at View Source The webcast will be archived for 90 days following the presentation.

The conference will be held at the Luxe Sunset Boulevard Hotel in Los Angeles, California, will feature 250 companies in the small-cap / micro-cap space, and will be attended by over 1,000 individuals.

GeneCentric Therapeutics Presents First Data on Novel Response Signatures to Treatment in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) Patients

On June 3, 2019 GeneCentric Therapeutics reported that it will present the first data on novel response signatures for metastatic, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treatments by applying its proprietary, RNA-sequencing based predictive response signature and Cancer Subtyping Platform (CSP) (Press release, GeneCentric Therapeutics, JUN 3, 2019, View Source [SID1234536836]). The initial response signature and MIBC cohort data are being presented at a poster session at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago, IL, later today.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"MIBC remains a significant area of unmet need for patients, with a median 5-year survival rate of 5 percent," said Dr. Mike Milburn, CEO/President of GeneCentric and senior author on the study. "The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP) offers further treatment options in MIBC, however, their clinical benefit varies considerably by patient. We are excited to be at the forefront of advancing such gene response signatures for the benefit of patients."

The overall goal of the study, conducted by GeneCentric scientists in collaboration with researchers at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill’s Lineberger Cancer Center, is to assess the genomic characteristics of MIBC patients treated with ICPs and to assess the potential implications of those characteristics on treatment responses and outcomes. The study involves applying the Company’s 60-gene 4-class MIBC expression subtyper (BCSP) and an initial FGFR3 activation response signature, developed from MIBC TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data along with other proprietary assays, to a cohort of de-identified MIBC patients who underwent prior ICP. To stratify and identify positive or negative ICP response indicators, comprehensive genomic analyses were performed on archived FFPE samples from patients within this cohort, followed by tumor and immune profiling as well as subtype and other response associated predictor analyses. The full analysis of the complete dataset (n=97) will be presented at a future meeting.

Details of the presentation are as follows:

Title: "RNAseq and DNA Whole-Exome Sequence Analysis Reveal Novel Response Signatures to IO Treatment in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) Patients."

Abstract Number: 4558

Date: June 3, 2019

Time: 1:15 PM to 4:15 PM

Location: Hall A

Presenter: Greg Mayhew, PhD, Director, Bioinformatics, GeneCentric Therapeutics

To read the abstract, please visit: View Source

Starpharma Signs Second Oncology Agreement With AstraZeneca

On June 3, 2019 Starpharma (ASX: SPL, OTCQX: SPHRY) reported a Development and Option Agreement with AstraZeneca (LON: AZN) to progress the development of a Dendrimer Enhanced Product (DEP) version of an undisclosed AstraZeneca major marketed oncology medicine (Press release, Starpharma, JUN 3, 2019, View Source [SID1234536835]). This is the second DEP commercial agreement Starpharma has signed with AstraZeneca, the first agreement being a multiproduct licence which covers novel oncology drug candidates such as AZD0466 (a Bcl2/xL inhibitor).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The agreement was signed during the 2019 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) (American Society of Clinical Oncology) meeting in Chicago. ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) attracts more than 40,000 cancer doctors, scientists, investors, pharmaceutical and life science executives.

Under this agreement, Starpharma will conduct preclinical testing of the DEP version of the AstraZeneca oncology product. At any time from the signing of this agreement and for a defined period after the completion of this testing, AstraZeneca may exercise its option and licence the DEP drug candidate for clinical and commercial development. If AstraZeneca exercises the option, an option exercise fee of US$5 million is payable to Starpharma, as well as industry standard development and commercialisation milestones and escalating royalties on sales. Further details regarding the major oncology medicine involved, drug candidates, and terms of the agreement remain confidential at this time for competitive reasons.

In the event AstraZeneca does not exercise its option to licence the DEP drug candidate within the defined period, Starpharma has the option to license the rights to develop and commercialise this DEP drug either itself or through a sub-licensee with milestones and royalties paid to AstraZeneca upon commercialisation of the resultant DEP product.

Dr Jackie Fairley, Starpharma Chief Executive Officer, said: "We are delighted to sign a new commercial DEP agreement at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) with our long-standing partner, AstraZeneca. This agreement follows a successful research program under which we identified a promising DEP candidate with a number of potential benefits. This agreement represents the culmination of that work and this DEP product has the potential to provide significantly enhanced patient benefit. Unlike our first DEP agreement with AstraZeneca, which applies DEP to novel oncology drug candidates, this agreement is for an existing major AstraZeneca oncology medicine and provides further validation of the value of the DEP platform and its broad application to both new chemical entities and existing products."

Susan Galbraith, Senior Vice President, R&D Early Oncology, AstraZeneca, said: "Building on our long-standing and successful working relationship with Starpharma, this agreement will enable us to further evaluate the potential of the DEP technology with the aim of improving treatment outcomes for patients."

Starpharma’s DEP platform remains available for further partnerships. Licences are typically product specific and structured to allow for multiple partnered-DEP programs to run in parallel.

Clinical Benefit and Safety of LONSURF® (trifluridine/tipiracil) Reinforced by New Data Presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 3, 2019 Servier and Taiho Oncology, Inc. a subsidiary of Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan), reported LONSURF (trifluridine/tipiracil, TAS-102) clinical data in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), metastatic gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (mGEJC) and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) at the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago (Press release, Servier, JUN 3, 2019, View Source [SID1234536834]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Patients over the age of 65 make up 60% of those with gastric cancer, with the average age of diagnosis being 68 years old.1 Therefore it is important to demonstrate the effectiveness of LONSURF for the treatment of gastric cancer for this population. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of LONSURF a subgroup analysis from the global Phase III trial TAGS was conducted. This study demonstrated that the safety and efficacy of LONSURF in patients 65 years and older who have a higher incidence of moderate renal impairment versus the placebo was comparable to the overall population included in TAGS. Additionally there were no reported treatment-related deaths among this sub-population, dose modification was more common but this did not lead to an increase in discontinuation compared to the overall population.2

"We are pleased to present further data from the global Phase III trial TAGS, the subgroup analyses reinforces the clinical benefit and safety profile of LONSURF for those aged over 65 years old with mGC and for patients with mGEJC," said Patrick Therasse, Head of Servier Research and Development Oncology. "Patients with mGC/mGEJC have no standard of care in the EU, and the data supports LONSURF as an effective and tolerable treatment option for those patients with advanced disease."

The abstracts presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) were:

A subgroup analysis from the Phase III TAGS trial in previously treated mGC and mGEJC patients demonstrates safety and efficacy of LONSURF in patients 65 and older who have a higher incidence of moderate renal impairment vs the overall population. (abstract #4037)
A subgroup analysis from the Phase III TAGS trial demonstrates a manageable safety profile and consistent efficacy in patients with previously treated mGEJC. (abstract #4038)
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from the Phase III TAGS trial in previously treated mGC and mGEJC patients shows that treatment with LONSURF is associated with a trend toward a lower risk of QoL deterioration than placebo consistent across all symptoms and functional scales. (abstract #4043)
A pooled safety analysis of patients receiving at least one dose of LONSURF in the two Phase III trials, TAGS and RECOURSE studies demonstrates a consistent safety profile across patients with mGC/mGEJC or mCRC compared with placebo. (abstract #4039)
LONSURF is indicated in the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have been previously treated with, or are not considered candidates for, available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan- based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents, and anti-EGFR agents. Applications for an additional indication in mGC including mGEJC for LONSURF are currently under review by health authorities in Australia, the European Union, Japan and Switzerland.

In February 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved LONSURF for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma previously treated with at least two prior lines of chemotherapy that included a fluoropyrimidine, a platinum, either a taxane or irinotecan, and if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy.

#ENDS#

About TAGS

TAGS (TAS-102 Gastric Study) is a Taiho-sponsored, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of LONSURF in 507 adult patients with previously treated mGC or mGEJC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), safety and tolerability, as well as quality of life. LONSURF demonstrated statistically significant improvement in OS and PFS compared with placebo. The median OS improved from 3.6 months with placebo to 5.7 months with LONSURF, HR 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0·56-0·85; P=0.00058).

For more information on TAGS, please visit www.ClinicalTrials.gov (View Source). The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT02500043.

About RECOURSE

The RECOURSE trial is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of LONSURF in patients with previously treated mCRC. The trial enrolled 800 patients in North America, Japan, Europe and Australia. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive LONSURF (35 mg/m2) or placebo, plus BSC, twice daily. The study met its primary and secondary endpoints of OS and PFS versus placebo. The median OS improved from 5.3 months with placebo to 7.1 months with LONSURF, HR 0.68 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.81; P<0.001).

About Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is a disease in which malignant cells form in the lining of the stomach. It is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related death (after lung and colorectal cancer), with an estimated 780,000 deaths annually.3 

When cancer spreads it is called advanced cancer. Locally advanced cancer is when the cancer has grown outside the organ it started in but hasn’t spread to other parts of the body. When the cancer spreads to other parts of the body, this is called metastatic cancer. In the last two decades, the proportion of patients with gastric cancer who present with metastases has risen to over 40%.4

Standard chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer include fluoropyrimidines, platinum derivatives, and taxanes (with ramucirumab), or irinotecan. The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy is standard of care for patients with HER2/neu-positive advanced gastric cancer. However, after failure of first- and second-line therapies, there are neither approved nor standard third-line treatments in the EU.

About Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide with approximately 1.8 million new diagnoses in 2018. Each year there are over 880,000 deaths making it the second biggest cancer killer worldwide (after lung cancer).5

Those with metastatic disease (where the cancer has spread from the primary site) the average five-year survival is approximately 11%.6 Standard chemotherapy regimens for advanced mCRC include fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan or targeted treatments, such as those that target vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) or endothelial growth factor receptors (EGFR).

Over the last decade, clinical outcomes for patients with mCRC have improved considerably due to the advent of novel treatment agents, predictive biomarkers, and a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapies. Currently, the median overall survival for patients with mCRC being treated both in phase III trials and in large observational series or registries is 30 months – more than double that of 20 years ago.7,8,9

About LONSURF10

LONSURF consists of a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, trifluridine, and the thymidine phosphorylase (TP) inhibitor, tipiracil, which increases trifluridine exposure by inhibiting its metabolism by TP. Trifluridine is incorporated into DNA, resulting in DNA dysfunction and inhibition of cell proliferation.

In the EU, LONSURF is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have been previously treated with, or are not considered candidates for, available therapies including fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies, anti-VEGF agents, and anti-EGFR agents.

As of May 2019, LONSURF has been approved as a treatment for advanced mCRC in 67 countries and regions. In February 2019, LONSURF has been approved as a treatment for mGC/mGEJC in the United States.

LONSURF was discovered and developed by Taiho Pharmaceutical. In June 2015, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Servier entered into an exclusive license agreement for the co-development and commercialization of LONSURF in Europe and other countries outside of the United States, Canada, Mexico and Asia