On June 1, 2025 AstraZeneca reported positive results from the SERENA-6 Phase III trial showed that camizestrant in combination with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib) demonstrated a highly statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (Press release, AstraZeneca, JUN 1, 2025, View Source [SID1234653554]). The trial evaluated switching to the camizestrant combination versus continuing standard-of-care treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) (anastrozole or letrozole) in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the 1st-line treatment of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer whose tumours have an emergent ESR1 mutation.
Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
These results will be presented today during the Plenary Session at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL (abstract #LBA4) and simultaneously published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Results showed the camizestrant combination reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 56% compared to standard-of-care treatment (based on a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–0.60; p<0.00001) as assessed by investigator. Median PFS was 16.0 months for patients who switched to the camizestrant combination versus 9.2 months for the comparator arm. Importantly, a consistent PFS benefit was observed across all CDK4/6 inhibitors and clinically relevant subgroups in the trial, including analysis by age, race, region, time of ESR1 mutation detection and type of ESR1 mutation.
The camizestrant combination was also associated with a meaningful delay in time to deterioration in quality of life, where in an exploratory endpoint, the camizestrant combination reduced the risk of deterioration in global health status and quality of life by 47% compared with the AI combination (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; nominal p<0.001). The median time to deterioration of global health status was 23.0 months in patients treated with the camizestrant combination, versus 6.4 months in patients that continued treatment with the AI combination (EORTC QLQ-C30). The camizestrant combination also delayed the time to deterioration of pain compared with the AI combination.
Data for the key secondary endpoints of time to second disease progression (PFS2) and overall survival (OS) were immature at the time of this interim analysis. However, a trend toward extended treatment benefit was observed with the camizestrant combination based on PFS2 (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33–0.81; p=0.0038 [interim analysis threshold p=0.0001]). The trial will continue to assess OS, PFS2 and other key secondary endpoints.
Nicholas Turner, MD, PhD, Professor of Molecular Oncology at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, and co-principal investigator for the trial, said: "Today’s news marks a pivotal moment in breast cancer care and redefines how we think about drug resistance in this type of breast cancer. The results of the innovative SERENA-6 trial show that switching from an aromatase inhibitor to camizestrant in combination with any of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors after emergence of an ESR1 mutation more than halved the risk of disease progression or death and delayed deterioration in quality of life by nearly 18 months. This proactive approach exemplifies a new treatment strategy in oncology; by treating developing resistance before it causes disease progression and deterioration in quality of life, we can extend the benefit of 1st-line treatment to optimise patient outcomes."
Susan Galbraith, Executive Vice President, Oncology Haematology R&D, AstraZeneca, said: "As the first pivotal trial to demonstrate the clinical value of monitoring circulating tumour DNA to detect emerging resistance and change therapy at the earliest opportunity; SERENA-6 is redefining the clinical paradigm in breast cancer. Camizestrant is the first and only next-generation oral SERD and complete estrogen receptor antagonist to demonstrate benefit in combination with widely approved CDK4/6 inhibitors in this 1st-line setting, and these results support its potential as a new standard-of-care endocrine therapy backbone in the treatment of HR-positive breast cancer."
Summary of results: SERENA-6
Camizestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor (n=155)
AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor
(n=155)
PFSi
Median PFS (months)
16.0 (12.7-18.2)
9.2 (7.2-9.5)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
0.44 (0.31-0.60)
p-value
p<0.00001
Time to deterioration in global health status/quality of lifeii
Mean TTD (months)
23.0 (13.8-NC)
6.4 (2.8, 14.0)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
0.53 (0.33-0.82)
p-value (nominal)
p<0.001
PFS2iii
Events
38
47
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
0.52 (0.33-0.81)
p-value
[interim analysis threshold P=0.0001]
P=0.0038
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NC, not calculable; TTD, time-to-deterioration.
i PFS was defined per RECIST v1.1. HR was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for stratification factors.
ii Assessments were conducted at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12 and then every 8 weeks until PFS2. Analysis conducted in patients with a baseline score and at least one post-baseline assessment. TTD in global health status/quality of life, an exploratory endpoint, was defined as the time from randomisation to first deterioration that was confirmed at a subsequent timepoint measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item quality-of-life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30). Deterioration was defined as a decrease from baseline ≥16.6. HR was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model stratified by time of ESR1 mutation detection (one test vs more than one test), and time from initiation of AI + CDK4/6i to randomisation (<18 months vs. ≥18 months).
iii HR was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for stratification factors. Final PFS2 analysis will occur at 158 PFS2 events.
The safety profile of camizestrant in combination with palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib in SERENA-6 was consistent with the known safety profile of each medicine. Consistent with the longer duration of exposure to the combination of camizestrant and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the trial, Grade 3 or higher adverse events from all causes occurred in 60% of patients in the camizestrant arm versus 46% in the AI arm; the majority of which were haematological events typically associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment and included neutropenia (45% vs. 34%), anaemia (5% vs. 5%) and leukopenia (10% vs. 3%). If experienced, photopsia – reported as brief flashes of light in the peripheral vision – did not impact daily activities of patients in the trial and was reversible. There were no structural changes in the eye or changes in visual acuity. No new safety signals were identified and discontinuation rates were very low and similar in both arms, with 1% patients discontinuing camizestrant and 2% patients discontinuing an AI. Discontinuation of the CDK4/6 inhibitor occurred in 1% of patients in both arms of the trial.
SERENA-6 is the first global, double-blind, registrational Phase III trial to use a circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-guided approach to detect the emergence of endocrine resistance and inform a switch in therapy before disease progression. The novel trial design used ctDNA monitoring at the time of routine tumour scans to identify patients for early signs of endocrine resistance and the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Following detection of an ESR1 mutation without disease progression, the endocrine therapy of patients was switched to camizestrant from ongoing treatment with an AI, while continuing combination with the same CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Based on the results of the SERENA-6 Phase III trial, camizestrant in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) has been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) in the US by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer upon emergence of ESR1 mutation during first-line endocrine-based therapy.
Notes
HR-positive breast cancer
Breast cancer is the second most common cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide.1 More than two million patients were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2022, with more than 665,000 deaths globally.1 While survival rates are high for those diagnosed with early breast cancer, only about 30% of patients diagnosed with or who progress to metastatic disease are expected to live five years following diagnosis.2
HR-positive breast cancer, characterised by the expression of estrogen or progesterone receptors, or both, is the most common subtype of breast cancer with 70% of tumours considered HR-positive and HER2-negative.2 ERs often drive the growth of HR-positive breast cancer cells.3
Globally, approximately 200,000 patients with HR-positive breast cancer are treated with a medicine in the 1st-line setting; most frequently with endocrine therapies that target estrogen receptor (ER)-driven disease, which are often paired with CDK4/6 inhibitors.4-6 However, resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors and current endocrine therapies develops in many patients with advanced disease.6 Once this occurs, treatment options are limited and survival rates are low with 35% of patients anticipated to live beyond five years after diagnosis.2,6,7
Mutations in the ESR1 gene are a key driver of endocrine resistance and are widely tested for in clinical practice at time of disease progression on 1st-line therapies.8,9 These mutations emerge during treatment of the disease, becoming more prevalent as the disease progresses and are associated with poor outcomes.8,9 Approximately 30% of patients with endocrine sensitive HR-positive disease develop ESR1 mutations during 1st-line treatment without disease progression.4
The optimisation of endocrine therapy and overcoming resistance to enable patients to continue benefiting from these treatments, as well as identifying new therapies for those who are less likely to benefit, are active areas of focus for breast cancer research.
SERENA-6
SERENA-6 is a Phase III, double-blind, randomised trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of camizestrant in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib) versus treatment with an AI (anastrozole or letrozole) in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib) in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (patients with either locally advanced disease, or metastatic disease) whose tumours have an emergent ESR1 mutation.
The global trial enrolled 315 adult patients with histologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, undergoing treatment with an AI in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor as 1st-line treatment. The primary endpoint of the SERENA-6 trial is PFS as assessed by investigator, with secondary endpoints including OS, and PFS2 by investigator assessment.
Camizestrant
Camizestrant is an investigational, potent, next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and complete ER antagonist that is currently in Phase III trials for the treatment of HR-positive breast cancer.
AstraZeneca’s broad, robust and innovative clinical development programme, including the SERENA-6, SERENA-4, CAMBRIA-1 and CAMBRIA-2 trials, is evaluating the safety and efficacy of camizestrant when used as a monotherapy or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors to address a number of areas of unmet need in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Camizestrant has demonstrated anti-cancer activity across a range of preclinical models, including those with ER-activating mutations. In the SERENA-2 Phase II trial, camizestrant demonstrated PFS benefit versus Faslodex (fulvestrant) irrespective of ESR1 mutation status or prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with ER-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, previously treated with endocrine therapy. The SERENA-1 Phase I trial demonstrated that camizestrant is well tolerated and has a promising anti-tumour profile when administered alone or in combination with palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib; three widely used CDK4/6 inhibitors.