Cerus Corporation to Participate in the TD Cowen 45th Annual Health Care Conference

On February 19, 2025 Cerus Corporation (Nasdaq: CERS) reported that members of Cerus’ management are scheduled to present at the TD Cowen 45th Annual Health Care Conference on Wednesday, March 5, at 11:10 a.m. EST (Press release, Cerus, FEB 19, 2025, View Source [SID1234650373]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

A live webcast of the fireside chat will be available via the following link. A replay will be available for 90 days after the event.

Bristol Myers Squibb Announces Opdivo® Plus Chemotherapy as the First and Only Neoadjuvant-Only Immuno-Oncology Therapy to Demonstrate Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful Overall Survival in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

On February 19, 2025 Bristol Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) reported the final analysis of overall survival (OS) from the Phase 3 CheckMate -816 study, which evaluated Opdivo (nivolumab) in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for adult patients with resectable (tumors ≥ 4 cm or node positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, FEB 19, 2025, View Source [SID1234650372]). The results showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS, a key secondary endpoint, compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The results build on the previously reported primary endpoints of event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR), which also met statistical significance.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The safety profile of Opdivo in combination with chemotherapy was consistent with previously reported studies, with no new safety signals observed.

"The final analysis of overall survival in the CheckMate -816 study underscores the potential of Opdivo in combination with chemotherapy to provide a meaningful survival benefit for patients with resectable NSCLC," said Dana Walker, M.D., M.S.C.E., vice president, global program lead, late development, oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb. "This is the first and only Phase 3 study of a neoadjuvant-only immuno-oncology therapy to show a statistically significant benefit in patients with resectable NSCLC. Opdivo -based therapies have shown improved efficacy in the neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment of patients with resectable NSCLC."

The company will conduct an analysis of the updated data and plans to provide a comprehensive update on the data in a future peer reviewed setting.

About CheckMate -816

CheckMate -816 is a Phase 3 randomized, open label, multi-center trial evaluating Opdivo with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable stage IB to IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (per the 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control staging criteria), regardless of PD-L1 expression. For the primary analysis, 358 patients were randomized to receive either Opdivo 360 mg plus histology-based platinum doublet chemotherapy every three weeks for three cycles, or platinum doublet chemotherapy every three weeks for three cycles, followed by surgery. The primary endpoints of the trial are event-free survival and pathologic complete response. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, major pathologic response, and time to death or distant metastases.

About Opdivo

Opdivo is a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor that is designed to uniquely harness the body’s own immune system to help restore anti-tumor immune response. By harnessing the body’s own immune system to fight cancer, Opdivo has become an important treatment option across multiple cancers.

Opdivo ’s leading global development program is based on Bristol Myers Squibb’s scientific expertise in the field of Immuno-Oncology and includes a broad range of clinical trials across all phases, including Phase 3, in a variety of tumor types. To date, the Opdivo clinical development program has treated more than 35,000 patients. The Opdivo trials have contributed to gaining a deeper understanding of the potential role of biomarkers in patient care, particularly regarding how patients may benefit from Opdivo across the continuum of PD-L1 expression.

In July 2014, Opdivo was the first PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive regulatory approval anywhere in the world. Opdivo is currently approved in more than 65 countries, including the United States, the European Union, Japan and China. In October 2015, the Company’s Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen was the first Immuno-Oncology combination to receive regulatory approval for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and is currently approved in more than 50 countries, including the United States and the European Union.

INDICATIONS

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with completely resected Stage IIB, Stage IIC, Stage III, or Stage IV melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy, is indicated as neoadjuvant treatment of adult patients with resectable (tumors ≥4 cm or node positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab) in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy, is indicated for neoadjuvant treatment of adult patients with resectable (tumors ≥4 cm or node positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, followed by single-agent OPDIVO as adjuvant treatment after surgery.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (≥1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab) and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with intermediate or poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with cabozantinib, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection of UC.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine, is indicated as first-line treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of completely resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer with residual pathologic disease in adult patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed herein may not include all possible severe and fatal immune- mediated adverse reactions.

Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue. While immune-mediated adverse reactions usually manifest during treatment, they can also occur after discontinuation of OPDIVO or YERVOY. Early identification and management are essential to ensure safe use of OPDIVO and YERVOY. Monitor for signs and symptoms that may be clinical manifestations of underlying immune-mediated adverse reactions. Evaluate clinical chemistries including liver enzymes, creatinine, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during treatment with OPDIVO and before each dose of YERVOY. In cases of suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, initiate appropriate workup to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.

Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). In general, if OPDIVO or YERVOY interruption or discontinuation is required, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose immune-mediated adverse reactions are not controlled with corticosteroid therapy. Toxicity management guidelines for adverse reactions that do not necessarily require systemic steroids (e.g., endocrinopathies and dermatologic reactions) are discussed below.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. The incidence of pneumonitis is higher in patients who have received prior thoracic radiation. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.9%), and Grade 2 (2.1%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 7% (31/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.0%), and Grade 2 (4.4%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.9% (26/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.4%) and Grade 2 (2.6%). In NSCLC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, immune- mediated pneumonitis occurred in 9% (50/576) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.5%), Grade 3 (3.5%), and Grade 2 (4.0%). Four patients (0.7%) died due to pneumonitis.

Immune-Mediated Colitis

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated colitis, which may be fatal. A common symptom included in the definition of colitis was diarrhea. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.7%) and Grade 2 (1%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 25% (115/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.4%), Grade 3 (14%) and Grade 2 (8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 9% (60/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.4%) and Grade 2 (3.7%).

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis and Hepatotoxicity

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (1.3%), and Grade 2 (0.4%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune- mediated hepatitis occurred in 15% (70/456) of patients, including Grade 4 (2.4%), Grade 3 (11%), and Grade 2 (1.8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 7% (48/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (1.2%), Grade 3 (4.9%), and Grade 2 (0.4%).

OPDIVO in combination with cabozantinib can cause hepatic toxicity with higher frequencies of Grade 3 and 4 ALT and AST elevations compared to OPDIVO alone. Consider more frequent monitoring of liver enzymes as compared to when the drugs are administered as single agents. In patients receiving OPDIVO and cabozantinib, Grades 3 and 4 increased ALT or AST were seen in 11% of patients.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune-mediated thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus, which can present with diabetic ketoacidosis. Withhold OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information). For Grade 2 or higher adrenal insufficiency, initiate symptomatic treatment, including hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Hypophysitis can present with acute symptoms associated with mass effect such as headache, photophobia, or visual field defects. Hypophysitis can cause hypopituitarism; initiate hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Thyroiditis can present with or without endocrinopathy. Hypothyroidism can follow hyperthyroidism; initiate hormone replacement or medical management as clinically indicated. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes; initiate treatment with insulin as clinically indicated.

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994), including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.6%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 8% (35/456), including Grade 4 (0.2%), Grade 3 (2.4%), and Grade 2 (4.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 7% (48/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.3%), Grade 3 (2.5%), and Grade 2 (4.1%). In patients receiving OPDIVO and cabozantinib, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 4.7% (15/320) of patients, including Grade 3 (2.2%) and Grade 2 (1.9%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (0.3%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (42/456), including Grade 3 (2.4%) and Grade 2 (6%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypophysitis occurred in 4.4% (29/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.3%), Grade 3 (2.4%), and Grade 2 (0.9%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, thyroiditis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, thyroiditis occurred in 2.7% (22/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.5%) and Grade 2 (2.2%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (<0.1%) and Grade 2 (1.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hyperthyroidism occurred in 9% (42/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.9%) and Grade 2 (4.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (80/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.6%) and Grade 2 (4.5%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism occurred in 8% (163/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.2%) and Grade 2 (4.8%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypothyroidism occurred in 20% (91/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (11%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, hypothyroidism occurred in 18% (122/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.6%) and Grade 2 (11%).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (0.4%) and Grade 2 (0.3%), and 2 cases of diabetic ketoacidosis. In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, diabetes occurred in 2.7% (15/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.6%), Grade 3 (0.3%), and Grade 2 (0.9%).

Immune-Mediated Nephritis with Renal Dysfunction

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause immune-mediated nephritis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.5%), and Grade 2 (0.6%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated nephritis with renal dysfunction occurred in 4.1% (27/666) of patients, including Grade 4 (0.6%), Grade 3 (1.1%), and Grade 2 (2.2%).

Immune-Mediated Dermatologic Adverse Reactions

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis. Exfoliative dermatitis, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) has occurred with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate nonexfoliative rashes.

YERVOY can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis, including bullous and exfoliative dermatitis, SJS, TEN, and DRESS. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate non-bullous/exfoliative rashes.

Withhold or permanently discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY depending on severity (please see section 2 Dosage and Administration in the accompanying Full Prescribing Information).

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients, including Grade 3 (1.1%) and Grade 2 (2.2%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated rash occurred in 28% (127/456) of patients, including Grade 3 (4.8%) and Grade 2 (10%). In patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, immune-mediated rash occurred in 16% (108/666) of patients, including Grade 3 (3.5%) and Grade 2 (4.2%).

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

The following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred at an incidence of <1% (unless otherwise noted) in patients who received OPDIVO monotherapy or OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY or were reported with the use of other PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies. Severe or fatal cases have been reported for some of these adverse reactions: cardiac/vascular: myocarditis, pericarditis, vasculitis; nervous system: meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis and demyelination, myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis (including exacerbation), Guillain-Barré syndrome, nerve paresis, autoimmune neuropathy; ocular: uveitis, iritis, and other ocular inflammatory toxicities can occur; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis to include increases in serum amylase and lipase levels, gastritis, duodenitis; musculoskeletal and connective tissue: myositis/polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, and associated sequelae including renal failure, arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica; endocrine: hypoparathyroidism; other (hematologic/immune): hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sarcoidosis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ transplant rejection, other transplant (including corneal graft) rejection.

In addition to the immune-mediated adverse reactions listed above, across clinical trials of YERVOY monotherapy or in combination with OPDIVO, the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in <1% of patients unless otherwise specified: nervous system: autoimmune neuropathy (2%), myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis, motor dysfunction; cardiovascular: angiopathy, temporal arteritis; ocular: blepharitis, episcleritis, orbital myositis, scleritis; gastrointestinal: pancreatitis (1.3%); other (hematologic/immune): conjunctivitis, cytopenias (2.5%), eosinophilia (2.1%), erythema multiforme, hypersensitivity vasculitis, neurosensory hypoacusis, psoriasis.

Some ocular IMAR cases can be associated with retinal detachment. Various grades of visual impairment, including blindness, can occur. If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada–like syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO and YERVOY, as this may require treatment with systemic corticosteroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.

Infusion-Related Reactions

OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause severe infusion-related reactions. Discontinue OPDIVO and YERVOY in patients with severe (Grade 3) or life-threatening (Grade 4) infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with mild (Grade 1) or moderate (Grade 2) infusion-related reactions. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients. In a separate trial in which patients received OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion or a 30- minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.2% (8/368) and 2.7% (10/369) of patients, respectively. Additionally, 0.5% (2/368) and 1.4% (5/369) of patients, respectively, experienced adverse reactions within 48 hours of infusion that led to dose delay, permanent discontinuation or withholding of OPDIVO. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.5% (10/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 5.1% (28/547) of patients. In MPM patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks with YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 12% (37/300) of patients.

Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Fatal and other serious complications can occur in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before or after being treated with OPDIVO or YERVOY. Transplant-related complications include hyperacute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after reduced intensity conditioning, and steroid-requiring febrile syndrome (without an identified infectious cause). These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between OPDIVO or YERVOY and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for evidence of transplant-related complications and intervene promptly. Consider the benefit versus risks of treatment with OPDIVO and YERVOY prior to or after an allogeneic HSCT.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on its mechanism of action and findings from animal studies, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. The effects of YERVOY are likely to be greater during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with OPDIVO and YERVOY and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Increased Mortality in Patients with Multiple Myeloma when OPDIVO is Added to a Thalidomide Analogue and Dexamethasone

In randomized clinical trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of OPDIVO to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.

Lactation

There are no data on the presence of OPDIVO or YERVOY in human milk, the effects on the breastfed child, or the effects on milk production. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed children, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment and for 5 months after the last dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 037, serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=268). Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 42% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions reported in 2% to <5% of patients receiving OPDIVO were abdominal pain, hyponatremia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased lipase. In Checkmate 066, serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=206). Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (3.9%) and diarrhea (3.4%). In Checkmate 067, serious adverse reactions (74% and 44%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (47% and 18%) or to dosing delays (58% and 36%), and Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (72% and 51%) all occurred more frequently in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) relative to the OPDIVO arm (n=313). The most frequent (≥10%) serious adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm and the OPDIVO arm, respectively, were diarrhea (13% and 2.2%), colitis (10% and 1.9%), and pyrexia (10% and 1.0%). In Checkmate 238, serious adverse reactions occurred in 18% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=452). Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25% of OPDIVO-treated patients (n=452). The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of OPDIVO-treated patients were diarrhea and increased lipase and amylase. In Checkmate 816, serious adverse reactions occurred in 30% of patients (n=176) who were treated with OPDIVO in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Serious adverse reactions in >2% included pneumonia and vomiting. No fatal adverse reactions occurred in patients who received OPDIVO in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. In Checkmate 77T, serious adverse reactions occurred in 21% of patients who received OPDIVO in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment (n=228). The most frequent (≥2%) serious adverse reactions was pneumonia. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2.2% of patients, due to cerebrovascular accident, COVID-19 infection, hemoptysis, pneumonia, and pneumonitis (0.4% each). In the adjuvant phase of Checkmate 77T, 22% of patients experienced serious adverse reactions (n=142). The most frequent serious adverse reaction was pneumonitis/ILD (2.8%). One fatal adverse reaction due to COVID-19 occurred. In Checkmate 227, serious adverse reactions occurred in 58% of patients (n=576). The most frequent (≥2%) serious adverse reactions were pneumonia, diarrhea/colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, pulmonary embolism, adrenal insufficiency, and hypophysitis. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1.7% of patients; these included events of pneumonitis (4 patients), myocarditis, acute kidney injury, shock, hyperglycemia, multi-system organ failure, and renal failure. In Checkmate 9LA, serious adverse reactions occurred in 57% of patients (n=358). The most frequent (>2%) serious adverse reactions were pneumonia, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, anemia, acute kidney injury, musculoskeletal pain, dyspnea, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 7 (2%) patients, and included hepatic toxicity, acute renal failure, sepsis, pneumonitis, diarrhea with hypokalemia, and massive hemoptysis in the setting of thrombocytopenia. In Checkmate 017 and 057, serious adverse reactions occurred in 46% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=418). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, dyspnea, pyrexia, pleural effusion, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. In Checkmate 057, fatal adverse reactions occurred; these included events of infection (7 patients, including one case of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia), pulmonary embolism (4 patients), and limbic encephalitis (1 patient). In Checkmate 743, serious adverse reactions occurred in 54% of patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were pneumonia, pyrexia, diarrhea, pneumonitis, pleural effusion, dyspnea, acute kidney injury, infusion-related reaction, musculoskeletal pain, and pulmonary embolism. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 4 (1.3%) patients and included pneumonitis, acute heart failure, sepsis, and encephalitis. In Checkmate 214, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY (n=547). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were diarrhea, pyrexia, pneumonia, pneumonitis, hypophysitis, acute kidney injury, dyspnea, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis. In Checkmate 9ER, serious adverse reactions occurred in 48% of patients receiving OPDIVO and cabozantinib (n=320). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were diarrhea, pneumonia, pneumonitis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and hyponatremia. Fatal intestinal perforations occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients. In Checkmate 025, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=406). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were acute kidney injury, pleural effusion, pneumonia, diarrhea, and hypercalcemia. In Checkmate 141, serious adverse reactions occurred in 49% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=236). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, dyspnea, respiratory failure, respiratory tract infection, and sepsis. In Checkmate 275, serious adverse reactions occurred in 54% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=270). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were urinary tract infection, sepsis, diarrhea, small intestine obstruction, and general physical health deterioration. In Checkmate 274, serious adverse reactions occurred in 30% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=351). The most frequent serious adverse reaction reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO was urinary tract infection. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1% of patients; these included events of pneumonitis (0.6%). In Checkmate 901, serious adverse reactions occurred in 48% of patients receiving OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reporting in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO with chemotherapy were urinary tract infection (4.9%), acute kidney injury (4.3%), anemia (3%), pulmonary embolism (2.6%), sepsis (2.3%), and platelet count decreased (2.3%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.6% of patients who received OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy; these included sepsis (1%). OPDIVO and/or chemotherapy were discontinued in 30% of patients and were delayed in 67% of patients for an adverse reaction. In Attraction-3, serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=209). Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO were pneumonia, esophageal fistula, interstitial lung disease, and pyrexia. The following fatal adverse reactions occurred in patients who received OPDIVO: interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (1.4%), pneumonia (1.0%), septic shock (0.5%), esophageal fistula (0.5%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.5%), pulmonary embolism (0.5%), and sudden death (0.5%). In Checkmate 577, serious adverse reactions occurred in 33% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=532). A serious adverse reaction reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO was pneumonitis. A fatal reaction of myocardial infarction occurred in one patient who received OPDIVO. In Checkmate 648, serious adverse reactions occurred in 62% of patients receiving OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=310). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients who received OPDIVO with chemotherapy were pneumonia (11%), dysphagia (7%), esophageal stenosis (2.9%), acute kidney injury (2.9%), and pyrexia (2.3%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5 (1.6%) patients who received OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy; these included pneumonitis, pneumatosis intestinalis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury. In Checkmate 648, serious adverse reactions occurred in 69% of patients receiving OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY (n=322). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% who received OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY were pneumonia (10%), pyrexia (4.3%), pneumonitis (4.0%), aspiration pneumonia (3.7%), dysphagia (3.7%), hepatic function abnormal (2.8%), decreased appetite (2.8%), adrenal insufficiency (2.5%), and dehydration (2.5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5 (1.6%) patients who received OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY; these included pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary embolism, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In Checkmate 649, serious adverse reactions occurred in 52% of patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=782). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy were vomiting (3.7%), pneumonia (3.6%), anemia (3.6%), pyrexia (2.8%), diarrhea (2.7%), febrile neutropenia (2.6%), and pneumonitis (2.4%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 16 (2.0%) patients who were treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy; these included pneumonitis (4 patients), febrile neutropenia (2 patients), stroke (2 patients), gastrointestinal toxicity, intestinal mucositis, septic shock, pneumonia, infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, mesenteric vessel thrombosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. In Checkmate 76K, serious adverse reactions occurred in 18% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=524). Adverse reactions which resulted in permanent discontinuation of OPDIVO in >1% of patients included arthralgia (1.7%), rash (1.7%), and diarrhea (1.1%). A fatal adverse reaction occurred in 1 (0.2%) patient (heart failure and acute kidney injury). The most frequent Grade 3-4 lab abnormalities reported in ≥1% of OPDIVO-treated patients were increased lipase (2.9%), increased AST (2.2%), increased ALT (2.1%), lymphopenia (1.1%), and decreased potassium (1.0%).

Common Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 037, the most common adverse reaction (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO (n=268) was rash (21%). In Checkmate 066, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO (n=206) vs dacarbazine (n=205) were fatigue (49% vs 39%), musculoskeletal pain (32% vs 25%), rash (28% vs 12%), and pruritus (23% vs 12%). In Checkmate 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) were fatigue (62%), diarrhea (54%), rash (53%), nausea (44%), pyrexia (40%), pruritus (39%), musculoskeletal pain (32%), vomiting (31%), decreased appetite (29%), cough (27%), headache (26%), dyspnea (24%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), arthralgia (21%), and increased transaminases (25%). In Checkmate 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO arm (n=313) were fatigue (59%), rash (40%), musculoskeletal pain (42%), diarrhea (36%), nausea (30%), cough (28%), pruritus (27%), upper respiratory tract infection (22%), decreased appetite (22%), headache (22%), constipation (21%), arthralgia (21%), and vomiting (20%). In Checkmate 238, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in OPDIVO-treated patients (n=452) vs ipilimumab-treated patients (n=453) were fatigue (57% vs 55%), diarrhea (37% vs 55%), rash (35% vs 47%), musculoskeletal pain (32% vs 27%), pruritus (28% vs 37%), headache (23% vs 31%), nausea (23% vs 28%), upper respiratory infection (22% vs 15%), and abdominal pain (21% vs 23%). The most common immune-mediated adverse reactions were rash (16%), diarrhea/colitis (6%), and hepatitis (3%). In Checkmate 816, the most common (>20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus chemotherapy arm (n=176) were nausea (38%), constipation (34%), fatigue (26%), decreased appetite (20%), and rash (20%). In Checkmate 77T, the most common adverse reactions (reported in ≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n= 228) were anemia (39.5%), constipation (32.0%), nausea (28.9%), fatigue (28.1%), alopecia (25.9%), and cough (21.9%). In Checkmate 227, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions were fatigue (44%), rash (34%), decreased appetite (31%), musculoskeletal pain (27%), diarrhea/colitis (26%), dyspnea (26%), cough (23%), hepatitis (21%), nausea (21%), and pruritus (21%). In Checkmate 9LA, the most common (>20%) adverse reactions were fatigue (49%), musculoskeletal pain (39%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (31%), rash (30%), decreased appetite (28%), constipation (21%), and pruritus (21%). In Checkmate 017 and 057, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=418) were fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, cough, dyspnea, and decreased appetite. In Checkmate 743, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY were fatigue (43%), musculoskeletal pain (38%), rash (34%), diarrhea (32%), dyspnea (27%), nausea (24%), decreased appetite (24%), cough (23%), and pruritus (21%). In Checkmate 214, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients treated with OPDIVO plus YERVOY (n=547) were fatigue (58%), rash (39%), diarrhea (38%), musculoskeletal pain (37%), pruritus (33%), nausea (30%), cough (28%), pyrexia (25%), arthralgia (23%), decreased appetite (21%), dyspnea (20%), and vomiting (20%). In Checkmate 9ER, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO and cabozantinib (n=320) were diarrhea (64%), fatigue (51%), hepatotoxicity (44%), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (40%), stomatitis (37%), rash (36%), hypertension (36%), hypothyroidism (34%), musculoskeletal pain (33%), decreased appetite (28%), nausea (27%), dysgeusia (24%), abdominal pain (22%), cough (20%) and upper respiratory tract infection (20%). In Checkmate 025, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=406) vs everolimus (n=397) were fatigue (56% vs 57%), cough (34% vs 38%), nausea (28% vs 29%), rash (28% vs 36%), dyspnea (27% vs 31%), diarrhea (25% vs 32%), constipation (23% vs 18%), decreased appetite (23% vs 30%), back pain (21% vs 16%), and arthralgia (20% vs 14%). In Checkmate 141, the most common adverse reactions (≥10%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=236) were cough (14%) and dyspnea (14%) at a higher incidence than investigator’s choice. In Checkmate 275, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=270) were fatigue (46%), musculoskeletal pain (30%), nausea (22%), and decreased appetite (22%). In Checkmate 274, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=351) were rash (36%), fatigue (36%), diarrhea (30%), pruritus (30%), musculoskeletal pain (28%), and urinary tract infection (22%).In Checkmate 901, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were nausea, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, constipation, decreased appetite, rash, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy. In Attraction-3, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in OPDIVO-treated patients (n=209) were rash (22%) and decreased appetite (21%). In Checkmate 577, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=532) were fatigue (34%), diarrhea (29%), nausea (23%), rash (21%), musculoskeletal pain (21%), and cough (20%). In Checkmate 648, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=310) were nausea (65%), decreased appetite (51%), fatigue (47%), constipation (44%), stomatitis (44%), diarrhea (29%), and vomiting (23%). In Checkmate 648, the most common adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with YERVOY were rash (31%), fatigue (28%), pyrexia (23%), nausea (22%), diarrhea (22%), and constipation (20%). In Checkmate 649, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with OPDIVO in combination with chemotherapy (n=782) were peripheral neuropathy (53%), nausea (48%), fatigue (44%), diarrhea (39%), vomiting (31%), decreased appetite (29%), abdominal pain (27%), constipation (25%), and musculoskeletal pain (20%). In Checkmate 76K, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO (n=524) were fatigue (36%), musculoskeletal pain (30%), rash (28%), diarrhea (23%) and pruritis (20%).

Surgery Related Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 77T, 5.3% (n=12) of the OPDIVO-treated patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, did not receive surgery due to adverse reactions. The adverse reactions that led to cancellation of surgery in OPDIVO- treated patients were cerebrovascular accident, pneumonia, and colitis/diarrhea (2 patients each) and acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis, hemoptysis, pneumonitis, COVID-19, and myositis (1 patient each).

Please see U.S. Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO and YERVOY.

Clinical Trials and Patient Populations

Checkmate 227-previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 9LA–previously untreated recurrent or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in combination with YERVOY and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy by histology; Checkmate 649–previously untreated advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction and esophageal adenocarcinoma; Checkmate 577–adjuvant treatment of esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer; Checkmate 238–adjuvant treatment of patients with completely resected Stage III or Stage IV melanoma; Checkmate 76K–adjuvant treatment of patients 12 years of age and older with completely resected Stage IIB or Stage IIC melanoma; Checkmate 274–adjuvant treatment of urothelial carcinoma; Checkmate 275–previously treated advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma; Checkmate 142–MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, as a single agent or in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 142–MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, as a single agent or in combination with YERVOY; Attraction-3–esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Checkmate 648-previously untreated, unresectable advanced recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in combination with chemotherapy; Checkmate 648-previously untreated, unresectable advanced recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 040–hepatocellular carcinoma, in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 743–previously untreated unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma, in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 037–previously treated metastatic melanoma; Checkmate 066-previously untreated metastatic melanoma; Checkmate 067–previously untreated metastatic melanoma, as a single agent or in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 017–second-line treatment of metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer; Checkmate 057–second-line treatment of metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer; Checkmate 816–neoadjuvant non-small cell lung cancer, in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy; Checkmate 77T–Neoadjuvant treatment with platinum-doublet chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer followed by single-agent OPDIVO as adjuvant treatment after surgery; Checkmate 901–Adult patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma; Checkmate 141–recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; Checkmate 025–previously treated renal cell carcinoma; Checkmate 214–previously untreated renal cell carcinoma, in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 9ER–previously untreated renal cell carcinoma, in combination with cabozantinib; Checkmate 205/039–classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

BioCryst to Present at Upcoming Investor Conferences

On February 19, 2025 BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: BCRX) reported that the company plans to present at the following conferences (Press release, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, FEB 19, 2025, View Source [SID1234650371]):

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

TD Cowen 45th Annual Health Care Conference in Boston on Wednesday, March 5, 2025, at 9:10 a.m. ET.
Barclays 27th Annual Global Healthcare Conference in Miami on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. ET.

Links to the live audio webcasts and replays of the presentations may be accessed in the Investors & Media section of BioCryst’s website at http://www.biocryst.com.

Clarity receives US FDA Fast Track Designation for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with Cu-67 SAR-bisPSMA

On February 19, 2025 Clarity Pharmaceuticals (ASX: CU6) ("Clarity" or "Company"), a clinical-stage radiopharmaceutical company with a mission to develop next-generation products that improve treatment outcomes for children and adults with cancer, reported that the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) for 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA for the treatment of adult patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have been previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) (Press release, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, FEB 19, 2025, View Source [SID1234650344]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

This milestone builds on Clarity’s earlier receipt of 2 FTDs for the diagnostic 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in patients with suspected metastasis of prostate cancer who are candidates for initial definitive therapy1, as well as patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer following definitive therapy2, with 2 Phase III registration trials underway (CLARIFY [NCT06056830]3 and AMPLIFY, respectively). These 3 FTDs demonstrate the quality of the data generated to date on the 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA products in addressing serious unmet needs in prostate cancer. The FTDs will enable Clarity to accelerate the development of its comprehensive program with the optimised SAR-bisPSMA agent to be used in patients with prostate cancer throughout the management of their cancer, from initial to late-stage disease, with an opportunity to completely change the entire treatment landscape for the large prostate cancer market.

The FDA’s FTD is designed to expedite the development and regulatory review of novel drugs addressing serious conditions with significant unmet medical needs. For SAR-bisPSMA, it provides a number of product development advantages. The designations pave the way for a faster review process once Clarity submits its product approval applications. Additionally, it enables more frequent communication with the FDA, allowing for rapid resolution of queries during development. Furthermore, Clarity can submit completed sections of its application as they are ready, rather than waiting for the entire package to be finished before it can be lodged with the FDA. These benefits would reduce the review time needed to bring this innovative and proprietary molecule to the prostate cancer imaging and therapy markets.

The data for this FTD submission was based on the preliminary results to date from the Phase I/IIa SECuRE study (NCT04868604)4, which is investigating the safety and efficacy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA for the treatment of mCRPC patients. The first 3 cohorts in the dose escalation phase of the trial were successfully completed with no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) reported in any of the participants dosed (15 participants). No adverse events (AEs) related to 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA were observed. Most AEs related to 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA were low grade (grade 1 or 2). The most common AE reported was mild dry mouth (grade 1, 5/15 participants, 33.3%).

Preliminary data shows that the majority of participants in the SECuRE study enrolled to date had bone metastasis (77%), high median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at baseline (112.86 ng/mL, range 0.1-1503.1) and were heavily pre-treated (59% of participants received 3 or more lines of therapy). Despite how heavily pre-treated these participants were, and how much disease they had, 73% of them across all cohorts (including the lowest dose cohort of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA at 4 GBq, single dose) showed reductions in PSA levels. The majority of patients that had an increase in PSA were on the single, lowest dose cohort 1 (4 GBq). PSA reductions of greater than 50% were seen in 45% of all trial participants, despite the overwhelming majority of participants only receiving a single dose of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (4, 8 or 12 GBq) in the trial. In cohorts 2, 3 and 4 (8 and 12 GBq single dose and 12 GBq multi-dose, respectively), in which most participants also only received 1 dose of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA, PSA reductions of greater than 35% were observed in almost 75% of participants and PSA was reduced by 80% or more in almost half of the participants so far, as patients continue in follow-up.

The trial is currently progressing through the highest dose cohort where participants were administered multiple doses of 12 GBq of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA. Recruitment into cohort 4 is complete, and the remaining 3 participants are currently in the safety and efficacy follow-up period after receiving their first 2 doses. Following completion of the follow-up up period, the safety review committee meeting is planned for March 2025. The largest drop in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in cohort 4 to date is a decline of 98% (from a baseline of 157.4 ng/mL). This participant, who had failed multiple lines of therapy prior to receiving 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT], ARPI and an investigational agent), has already had a radiographic partial response based on the investigator’s assessment of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1 (RECIST) criteria. Preliminary analysis showed a reduction of 60.6% in tumour volume evaluated by PSMA positron emission tomography [PET] imaging with 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA.

Cohort expansion of the SECuRE trial to assess the combination of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA with enzalutamide

For a long time, Clarity has been working closely with many important global medical experts in the field of prostate cancer, including the Company’s Clinical Advisory Board members, Prof Louise Emmett and Prof Oliver Sartor, to optimise the development of all of its products in prostate cancer. Those discussions have led to a recent protocol amendment for the SECuRE trial, which aims to investigate ways to further improve the treatment outcomes for these patients. The protocol amendment is aligned with the positive results of the Enza-p trial presented by Prof Emmett first at the European Society for Medical Oncology in 20235 and more recently at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Genitourinary Cancers (ASCO GU) Symposium in 20256, which confirmed the hypothesis that targeting both androgen signalling and PSMA receptors concurrently would improve anti-cancer activity in mCRPC. The latest SECuRE protocol amendment increased the number of participants in the cohort expansion phase from 14 to 24 patients in the mCRPC pre-chemotherapy setting, with a subset of patients to receive the combination therapy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA with enzalutamide. This protocol amendment has now been approved at many of the participating trial sites, and the changes are expected to further enhance the already positive results of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA observed in the SECuRE trial to date. This strategy focuses on the commercialisation of the product firstly in the largest market for prostate cancer therapies in mCRPC, with pre-chemotherapy being 3 times larger than the post-chemotherapy setting, and creates opportunities for the use of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA with a range of ARPIs in future clinical development. Addressing the radiopharmaceuticals supply issues with current treatments in such a large indication requires a streamlined approach for which Clarity’s 64Cu/67Cu platform is well and uniquely suited.

Clarity’s Executive Chairperson, Dr Alan Taylor, commented, "Receiving 3 FTDs for the one molecule, SAR-bisPSMA, within the last 6 months is an incredible achievement for Clarity, highlighting how impressive our science and development are, the significance of the diagnostic and therapeutic data so far, and the high unmet need for better therapies and diagnostics in prostate cancer.

"The dual-targeted bisPSMA molecule was developed at the benchtop of Australian science with the intent of overcoming the shortfalls of the current generation of PSMA-targeting products. It was optimised with two PSMA ligands, which increases not only the amount of product in the lesions, but also how long the product is retained in the lesions over time, making it an ideal candidate for both diagnosis and therapy. The clinical data in both diagnostic and therapeutic indications that we are generating is remarkable, confirming the results that we initially saw in preclinical development. The granting of FTDs by the US FDA for 3 distinct indications in prostate cancer that we are aiming to address with this product is testament to the incredible work of our team and collaborators. This latest FTD will allow us flexibility to develop 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in both pre- and post-chemotherapy patients in the mCRPC setting, with initial focus on the largest market segment. The SECuRE study will also provide invaluable information on the potential of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA to be combined with enzalutamide and other ARPIs in future, creating opportunities for the broader use of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA in those patients with such high unmet medical need.

"These designations will allow us to work closely with the FDA to facilitate the development process and accelerate the approval of what could become best-in-class therapy and diagnostic agents, and our team and collaborators are committed to making this our priority in order to achieve our ultimate goal of improving treatment outcomes for people with cancer."

About SAR-bisPSMA
SAR-bisPSMA derives its name from the word "bis", which reflects a novel approach of connecting two PSMA-targeting agents to Clarity’s proprietary sarcophagine (SAR) technology that securely holds copper isotopes inside a cage-like structure, called a chelator. Unlike other commercially available chelators, the SAR technology prevents copper leakage into the body. SAR-bisPSMA is a Targeted Copper Theranostic (TCT) that can be used with isotopes of copper-64 (Cu-64 or 64Cu) for imaging and copper-67 (Cu-67 or 67Cu) for therapy.

64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA is an unregistered product. The safety and efficacy of 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA has not been assessed by health authorities such as the U.S. FDA or the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). There is no guarantee that this product will become commercially available.

About the SECuRE trial
SECuRE (NCT04868604)4 is a Phase I/IIa theranostic trial for identification and treatment of an advanced form of prostate cancer, mCRPC. It is a multi-centre, single arm, dose escalation study with a cohort expansion. The aim of this trial is to determine the safety and tolerability of both 64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA and 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA, as well as the efficacy of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA as a therapy. A recent protocol amendment has increased the number of participants in the cohort expansion phase from 14 to 24, and a subset of participants will receive the combination of 67Cu-SAR-bisPSMA with enzalutamide.

About Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in men globally and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide7. Prostate cancer is the second-leading causes of cancer death in American men. The American Cancer Institute estimates in 2025 there will be about 313,780 new cases of prostate cancer in the U.S. and around 35,770 deaths from the disease.

Agreement and Plan of Merger

On February 18, 2025, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), filed its definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A (as such may be supplemented from time to time, the "Proxy Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") with respect to the special meeting of the Company’s stockholders (the "Special Meeting") to be held in connection with transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), dated as of January 10, 2025, by and among the Company, Johnson & Johnson, a New Jersey corporation ("Johnson & Johnson"), and Fleming Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson ("Merger Sub"), pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the "Merger"), with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson (Filing, 8-K, Intra-Cellular Therapies, MAR 18, 2025, View Source [SID1234651221]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The Special Meeting is scheduled for March 27, 2025, beginning at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The Company’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 13, 2025 will be eligible to vote at the Special Meeting. The information contained in this Current Report on Form 8-K (this "Form 8-K") should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety.

Litigation Relating to the Merger

On February 26, 2025 a purported stockholder of the Company filed a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against the Company and its Board of Directors, captioned Morgan v. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., et al., Index No. 651153/2025 (the "Morgan Complaint"). On February 27, 2025, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court against the Company and its Board of Directors, captioned O’Neill v. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., et al., Index No. 651115/2025 (the "O’Neill Complaint"). The Morgan Complaint and the O’Neill Complaint generally allege, among other things, that the Proxy Statement negligently misrepresents and/or fails to disclose material information in violation New York law. The Morgan Complaint and the O’Neill Complaint each seek, among other things, injunctive relief, rescissory or other unspecified monetary damages, and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses.

On March 3, 2025, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County, against the Company, its Board of Directors and Johnson & Johnson, captioned Drulias v. Mates, et al., Case No. SOM C-012016-25 (the "Drulias Complaint" and together with the Morgan Complaint and the O’Neill Complaint, the "Complaints"). The Drulias Complaint generally alleges, among other things, that the Company’s Board of Directors breached its fiduciary duties under Delaware law in entering into the Merger, that the Company and its Board of Directors failed to disclose material information in the Proxy Statement, and that Johnson & Johnson aided and abetted those breaches. The Drulias Complaint seeks, among other things, a declaration that the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties and/or aided and abetted such breaches, an order requiring corrective disclosures, injunctive relief, unspecified compensatory and/or rescissory damages, and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses.

As of the date of this Form 8-K, attorneys representing multiple purported stockholders of the Company have also delivered demand letters to the Company (collectively, the "Demand Letters") alleging that the disclosures contained in the Proxy Statement are deficient and requesting that the Company supplement such disclosures prior to the Special Meeting. The Demand Letters threaten the Company with lawsuits in the event that the purported deficiencies in the Proxy Statement are not addressed.

It is possible that additional, similar complaints may be filed, that the Complaints described above may be amended, or that additional demand letters will be received by the Company. If this occurs, the Company does not intend to announce the filing or receipt of each additional, similar complaint or demand letter or any amended complaint unless required by law.

The Company believes that the claims asserted in the Complaints and the Demand Letters are without merit. However, in order to moot the unmeritorious disclosure claims, alleviate the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in potential litigation and provide additional information to its stockholders, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Proxy Statement as described in this Form 8-K. Nothing in this Form 8-K shall be deemed an

admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations set forth in the Complaints and the Demand Letters that any additional disclosure in the Proxy Statement was or is required.

Supplemental Disclosures

The following disclosures supplement the disclosures contained in the Proxy Statement and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures contained in the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. To the extent the information set forth herein differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement, the information set forth herein shall supersede or supplement the information in the Proxy Statement. All page references are to pages in the Proxy Statement, and terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement.

(a)
The disclosure under the section entitled " — Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by deleting the bulleted list of selected companies beginning on page 49 of the Proxy Statement, and replacing it with the following chart:

Company
EV / 2027 Revenue Multiple

Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

1.8x
Alkermes plc.

2.9x
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

3.1x
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

3.6x
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

3.0x
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

3.6x
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

3.1x
TG Therapeutics, Inc.

4.7x

(b)
The disclosure under the section entitled " — Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following double underlined language to a new rightmost column of the table set forth on page 51 of the Proxy Statement:

Date Announced
Target

Acquiror TV / Three-Year
Forward Revenue
Multiple
December 2022 Horizon Therapeutics Public Limited Company Amgen Inc. 5.4x
August 2022 Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. Pfizer Inc. 7.3x
May 2022 Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. Pfizer Inc. 6.0x
February 2021 GW Pharmaceuticals plc Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public
Limited Company 6.0x
December 2020 Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AstraZeneca PLC 5.2x
January 2018 Bioverativ Inc. Sanofi SA 7.0x
January 2017 Actelion Ltd. Johnson & Johnson 9.9x
January 2016 Baxalta Incorporated Shire plc 4.6x
January 2015 NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shire plc 6.9x

(c)
The disclosure under the section entitled " — Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following double underlined language to the last paragraph beginning on page 51 of the Proxy Statement:

In performing this analysis, Centerview calculated a range of equity values for shares of our common stock by (a) discounting to present value as of December 31, 2024 using discount rates ranging from 10.25% to 12.25% (reflecting

Centerview’s analysis of ITI’s weighted average cost of capital) and using a mid-year convention: (i) the forecasted risk-adjusted, after-tax unlevered free cash flows of ITI over the period beginning on January 1, 2025 and ending on December 31, 2047, utilized by Centerview based on the Projections, (ii) a range of implied terminal values of ITI, calculated by Centerview by adjusting ITI’s fiscal year 2047 risk-adjusted, after-tax unlevered free cash flow based on the Projections to account for normalized levels of working capital and research and development expenses, and applying a selected range of perpetuity growth rates of 0.0% to 3.0% (which range Centerview was instructed to use by ITI’s management), based on information provided by ITI management as of January 9, 2025 and set forth in the internal data and (iii) tax savings from usage of ITI’s estimated federal net operating losses as of December 31, 2024 of $468 million and research and development tax credits as of December 31, 2024 of $51 million and ITI’s future losses, in each case which amount was provided by ITI management as set forth in the internal data and (b) adding to the foregoing results ITI’s estimated net cash as of December 31, 2024 of approximately $1 billion, which amount was provided by ITI management as set forth in the internal data. Centerview divided the result of the foregoing calculations by the number of fully diluted outstanding shares of ITI’s common stock (determined using the treasury stock method and taking into account approximately 106.2 million shares of ITI’s common stock, approximately 3.1 million outstanding in-the-money options with a weighted average exercise price of $31.23, approximately 2.0 million restricted stock units, and approximately 0.2 million performance stock units (including assumptions regarding the vesting of such performance stock units)), based on information provided by ITI management as set forth in the internal data. This analysis resulted in a range of implied equity values per share of our common stock of $102.90 to $127.70, rounded to the nearest $0.05. Centerview then compared this range to the Merger Consideration of $132.00 per share to be paid to the holders of our common stock (other than Excluded Shares) pursuant to the Merger Agreement.

(d)
The disclosure under the section entitled " — Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Centerview Partners LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following double underlined language to the second and third bullets under the first full paragraph beginning on page 52 of the Proxy Statement:


Analyst Price Targets Analysis. Centerview reviewed stock price targets for shares of ITI’s common stock in 14 publicly available Wall Street research analyst reports as of January 8, 2025 which indicated low and high stock price targets for ITI ranging from $87.00 to $135.00 per share (with a median price target of $101.00 per share).


Precedent Premiums Paid Analysis. Centerview performed an analysis of premiums paid in the selected transactions involving publicly traded scaled commercial stage biotechnology companies, as set forth above in "Selected Precedent Transaction Analysis". The premiums in this analysis were calculated by comparing the per share acquisition price in each transaction to the closing price of the target company’s common stock for the date one day prior to the date on which the trading price of the target company’s common stock was perceived by Centerview to be affected by a potential transaction, which indicated low and high premiums of 37% and 102% (with a median of 51%). Based on the analysis above and other considerations that Centerview deemed relevant in its professional judgment, Centerview applied a premium range of 35% to 85% to ITI’s closing stock price on January 8, 2025 (the last full trading day prior to the date on which the Board of Directors met to approve the Merger) of $82.56, which resulted in an implied price range of approximately $111.45 to $152.75 per share, rounded to the nearest $0.05.

(e)
The disclosure under the section entitled " —Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Jefferies LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following double underlined language to a new rightmost column of the table beginning on page 56 of the Proxy Statement:

Date Announced
Target

Acquiror Enterprise Value /
Peak Sales Multiples
December 2023 Karuna Therapeutics, Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 1.6x
July 2023 Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Biogen Inc. 2.4x
April 2023 IVERIC bio, Inc. Astellas Pharma Inc. 1.4x
August 2022 Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. Pfizer Inc. 1.8x

May 2022 Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. Pfizer Inc. 1.8x
February 2021 GW Pharmaceuticals plc Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public
Limited Company 2.4x
October 2020 MyoKardia, Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 1.7x
November 2019 The Medicines Company Novartis AG 1.5x

(f)
The disclosure under the section entitled " —Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Jefferies LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by deleting the bulleted list of selected companies below the third paragraph on page 57 of the Proxy Statement, and replacing it with the following chart:

Company Enterprise Value / 2027 Revenue Multiples
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1.8x
Alkermes plc. 2.9x
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. 3.1x
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 3.6x
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. 3.0x
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. 3.6x
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 3.1x
TG Therapeutics, Inc. 4.7x

(g)
The disclosure under the section entitled " —Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Jefferies LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following double underlined language to the second paragraph on page 58 of the Proxy Statement:

Jefferies performed a discounted cash flow analysis of ITI by calculating the estimated present value of the stand-alone risk-adjusted unlevered free cash flows, as described further in the section of this proxy statement captioned " —Certain Financial Projections", that ITI was forecasted to generate during the fiscal years ending December 31, 2025 through December 31, 2047 based on the Projections. Jefferies also calculated a range of terminal values for ITI by adjusting ITI’s fiscal year 2047 risk-adjusted unlevered free cash flow based on the Projections to account for normalized levels of working capital and research and development expenses, and applying a selected range of perpetuity growth rates of 0.0% to 3.0% (which range Jefferies was instructed to use by ITI’s management). The net present value as of December 31, 2024 of the risk-adjusted unlevered free cash flows and terminal value of ITI described in the preceding sentences were then calculated using the mid-year convention and a selected discount rate range of 10.25% to 12.25%, based on Jefferies’ estimate of ITI’s weighted average cost of capital. This resulted in a range of implied enterprise values for ITI. Jefferies then added ITI’s estimated net cash as of December 31, 2024 of approximately $1 billion, and the present value of ITI’s estimated federal net operating loss carryforwards of $468 million and research and development credits of $51 million, each as of December 31, 2024, and future losses (in each case as provided by ITI’s management), to calculate a range of implied equity values. Jefferies divided the result by the number of fully diluted outstanding shares of our common stock as of January 9, 2025 (determined using the treasury stock method and taking into account approximately 106.2 million shares of ITI’s common stock, approximately 3.1 million outstanding in-the-money options with a weighted average exercise price of $31.23, approximately 2.0 million restricted stock units, and approximately 0.2 million performance stock units (including assumptions regarding the vesting of such performance stock units)), as provided by ITI’s management, to calculate a range of implied per share equity values for ITI. This analysis indicated a reference range of implied per share equity values of $102.90 to $127.70 per share, as compared to the Merger Consideration of $132.00 per share.

(h)
The disclosure under the section entitled " —Opinions of ITI’s Financial Advisors – Opinion of Jefferies LLC" is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following double underlined language to the second bullet under the third full paragraph on page 58 of the Proxy Statement:


the publicly available stock price targets for our shares of common stock by 14 research analysts, which indicated low and high stock price targets ranging from $87.00 per share to $135.00 per share (with a median price target of $101.00 per share), as compared to the Merger Consideration of $132.00 per share.

Additional Information and Where to Find It

On February 18, 2025, the Company filed the Proxy Statement with the SEC in connection with the proposed acquisition of the Company by Parent. Beginning on February 18, 2025, the Proxy Statement and proxy card were mailed to the Company’s stockholders of record as of February 13, 2025. Other documents regarding the transaction may be filed with the SEC. This Current Report on Form 8-K is not a substitute for the Proxy Statement or any other document that the Company may file with the SEC and send to its stockholders in connection with the transaction. Before making any voting decision, the Company’s stockholders are urged to read all relevant documents filed or to be filed with the SEC, including the Proxy Statement, as well as any amendments or supplements to those documents, when they become available, because they contain or will contain important information about the Company and the proposed acquisition.

The Company’s stockholders are or will be able to obtain a free copy of the Proxy Statement, as well as other filings containing information about Parent and the Company, free of charge, at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Copies of the Proxy Statement and other documents filed by the Company with the SEC may be obtained from the Company, free of charge, by contacting the Company through its website at View Source

Participants in the Solicitation

Parent and the Company and certain of their respective directors and executive officers, under SEC rules, may be deemed to be "participants" in the solicitation of proxies from stockholders of the Company in connection with the proposed transaction. Information about Parent’s directors and executive officers is available in Parent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2024, which was filed with the SEC on February 13, 2025, and Parent’s definitive proxy statement for its 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, which was filed with the SEC on March 13, 2024. Information about the Company’s directors and executive officers is available in the Proxy Statement, which was filed with the SEC on February 18, 2025. To the extent holdings of Parent’s or the Company’s securities by their respective directors or executive officers have changed since the amounts set forth in such proxy statements, such changes have been or will be reflected on Initial Statements of Beneficial Ownership on Form 3 or Statements of Change in Ownership on Form 4 filed with the SEC. Investors and stockholders of the Company are or will be able to obtain these documents free of charge from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, from Parent on Parent’s website at www.jnj.com, from the Company on the Company’s website at www.intracellulartherapies.com or on request from Parent or the Company.