Infinity Pharmaceuticals Provides MARIO-3 Update in Patients with Front Line Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Suggesting Potential Long-Term Patient Benefit of Eganelisib

On November 14, 2022 Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: INFI) ("Infinity" or the "Company"), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing eganelisib, a first-in-class, oral, immuno-oncology macrophage reprogramming therapeutic, reported an update from its MARIO-3 study of eganelisib in combination with atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in front-line metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (Press release, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, NOV 14, 2022, View Source [SID1234623995]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Given our goal of improving long-term patient outcomes, we are particularly pleased to see that the addition of eganelisib to standard of care therapy showed benefit in the one-year progression free survival rate in MARIO-3 regardless of PD-L1 status," said Robert Ilaria, Jr., MD, Chief Medical Officer of Infinity. "These data reinforce the positive two-year landmark overall survival data from MARIO-275 in 2L urothelial cancer, also regardless of PD-L1 status, and the encouraging PFS observed in checkpoint inhibitor refractory squamous cell cancer of the head and neck in our MARIO-1 study, which all support the potential of eganelisib to improve long term outcomes for patients."

MARIO-3 mTNBC Updated Data:

62 patients were enrolled and evaluable for safety, and 57 patients were evaluable for efficacy, with a median duration of follow-up of 10.0 (8.1,14.2) months. Of the 57 evaluable patients:
35 patients (61.4%) had PD-L1(-) tumors
18 patients (31.6%) had PD-L1(+) tumors
4 patients (7.0%) had tumors of undetermined PD-L1 status
With an additional year of data maturity since the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2021, there is now encouraging evidence of a long-term patient progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with improved one-year PFS rates in MARIO-3, including in patients with both PD-L1(+) and PD-L1(-) tumors, compared to the benchmark IMpassion130 study.

ITT

PD-L1 (+)

PD-L1 (-)

MARIO-3

n=57^

IMpassion130

n=451^^

MARIO-3

n=18

IMpassion130

n=185

MARIO-3

n=35

IMpassion130

n=266

One-Year PFS Rate, % (95% CI)

36.0%

(23.7, 49.3)

23.7%

(19.6, 27.9)

37.5%

(16.8, 60.9)

29.1%

(22.2, 36.1)

34.7%

(19.6, 51.6)

NR*

One-Year PFS Rate improvement compared to IMpassion130

52%

relative improvement

29%

relative improvement

NE**

[46% relative improvement compared to IMpassion130 ITT]

Median duration of follow up, months (95% CI)

10.0

(8.1, 14.2)

13.0

(NR*)

9.9

(5.5, NA)

NR*

9.3

(5.9, 14.2)

NR*

Data Snapshot: 8 October 2022

^4 patients of unknown PD-L1 status

^^ Schmid et al NEJM 2018

* NR = Not Reported

**NE = Not Evaluable

Additional data from the MARIO-3 study, by patient population and relative to IMpassion130 benchmarks:

PD-L1 (+)

PD-L1 (-)

MARIO-3

n=18

IMpassion130^

n=185

MARIO-3

n=35

IMpassion130^

n=265

CR, % (n)^^

16.7 (3)

10.3 (19)

5.7 (2)

4.9 (13)

ORR, % (n)^^

66.7 (12)

58.9 (109)

54.3 (19)

54.0 (143)

mDOR (mos) n (95% CI)^

11.7

n=12

(1.8, NA)

8.5

n=109

(7.3, 9.7)

7.4

n=19

(3.7, NA)

NR*

mDOR increase compared to IMpassion130

3.2 mos

(37.6% increase)

NE**

mPFS, mos

(95% CI)

6.4
(3.6, NA)

7.5
(6.7, 9.2)

7.3
(5.2, 13.3)

5.6
(5.5, 7.3)

Data Snapshot: 8 October 2022

^Schmid et al NEJM 2018 with PD-L1(-) data calculated based on ITT and PD-L1(+) data

^^ Includes unconfirmed and confirmed responses for MARIO-3

*NR = Not Reported

** NE = Not Evaluable

No new safety signals were observed during the extended period on treatment, and the MARIO-3 safety profile continued to be consistent with expectations for the three component drugs.
Most Common Treatment-Related TEAEs in ≥ 10% of All Treated Patients^* (n=62)
Preferred
Term/Grouped Term

Treatment
related TEAE
(All), n (%)

Treatment-related
TEAE (≥ Gr. 3),
n (%)

Fatigue

30 (48.4)

4 (6.5)

Skin AEs

29 (46.8)

7 (11.3)

Nausea

28 (45.2)

0 (0.0)

Hepatic AEs**

24 (38.7)

15 (24.2)

Diarrhea

18 (29.0)

3 (4.8)

Alopecia

16 (25.8)

0 (0.0)

Neutropenia AEs

16 (25.8)

9 (14.5)

Vomiting

13(21.0)

1 (1.6)

Pyrexia

10 (16.1)

0 (0.0)

Peripheral neuropathy

19 (30.6)

7 (11.3)

Stomatitis

9 (14.5)

0 (0.0)

Decreased appetite

8 (12.9)

0 (0.0)

Headache

8 (12.9)

0 (0.0)

Weight decreased

7 (11.3)

1 (1.6)

Dysgeusia

7 (11.3)

0 (0.0)

Constipation

7 (11.3)

0 (0.0)

Data Snapshot: 23 July 2022

Presented in descending order of All Treatment-Related TEAE

^ Treatment-related is related to any of the study drugs (eganelisib, atezolizumab, nab-paclitaxel)

* No treatment-related Grade 5 AEs

** One Grade 4 event and no event met Hy’s Law criteria

Hepatic, skin, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy represent grouped preferred terms.

Treatment Discontinuation:
74% of patients were able to remain on treatment with the MARIO-3 TNBC triplet regimen compared to 81% of patients with the IMpassion130 doublet.