AVEO Oncology Announces Positive Results from Randomized Phase 2 Study of Ficlatuzumab in Combination with Cetuximab in Pan-Refractory, Metastatic HNSCC

On May 19, 2021 AVEO Oncology (Nasdaq: AVEO), a commercial and clinical development stage biopharmaceutical company, reported results from a randomized confirmatory Phase 2 study of ficlatuzumab as a single agent or in combination with cetuximab (ERBITUX), an EGFR-targeted antibody, in patients who relapsed or were refractory to prior immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and cetuximab (pan-refractory) with metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (Press release, AVEO, MAY 19, 2021, View Source [SID1234580271]). Ficlatuzumab is AVEO’s potent humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that targets hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). The results will be presented by lead investigator Julie E. Bauman, M.D., MPH, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Deputy Director, University of Arizona Cancer Center, at a poster discussion session of the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, which is being held June 4-8 in a virtual setting.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Human papillomavirus (HPV) negative HNSCC is associated with poorer outcomes compared to HPV positive disease, particularly in pan-refractory disease, where there are currently no effective treatment options," said Professor Bauman. "Crosstalk between EGFR and HGF/cMet pathways is a known tumor intrinsic resistance mechanism, and HGF expression is known to be high in HPV negative disease, suggesting that the simultaneous inhibition of these pathways with cetuximab and ficlatuzumab could enhance anti-cancer response in this population. Results from this study are highly encouraging, with notable activity in pan-refractory, HPV negative disease warranting Phase 3 investigation."

"Results in patients with HPV negative disease who received ficlatuzumab and cetuximab produced prolonged progression free survival (PFS) and a response rate of 38%, which included two (18%) complete responses (CRs). These results suggest the combination has the potential to play a meaningful role in the treatment and the ultimate quality of life of patients with relapsed/metastatic HNSCC," said Michael Bailey, president and chief executive officer of AVEO. "The results compare favorably to historical controls of cetuximab in earlier lines of treatment. After receiving FDA feedback, we look forward to making a go/no-go decision by mid-year on the initiation of a Phase 3 study in an HPV negative HNSCC patient population, which we would expect to initiate in the first half of 2022, upon the availability of clinical drug supply."

In the Phase 2 study, a total of 60 patients with metastatic HNSCC who relapsed or were refractory to prior immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and cetuximab were randomized 1:1 to receive either ficlatuzumab alone (20 mg/kg IV) or ficlatuzumab in combination with cetuximab (500 mg/m2 IV) every two weeks. The ficlatuzumab/cetuximab combination arm met the study’s primary endpoint of median PFS, with the 32 evaluable patients in the arm demonstrating a median PFS of 3.6 months (lower bound 90% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 months; p=0.04), and 1.8 months (lower bound 90% CI: 1.7 months) for the 26 evaluable patients receiving ficlatuzumab alone. For the key secondary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR), the combination arm demonstrated an ORR of 19%, and 4% for ficlatuzumab alone.

Enrolled patients were stratified by HPV status, as HPV negative patients are known to have poorer outcomes. In an exploratory comparison of the HPV positive (n=16) and HPV negative (n=16) subgroups of the combination arm, HPV negative patients demonstrated both a superior ORR of 38% (versus 0% for HPV positive, p=0.02), with two CRs and four partial responses, and a median PFS of 4.1 months (versus 2.3 months for HPV positive, p=0.03). These results reflect updated data from those available at the time of abstract submission.

The combination of ficlatuzumab and cetuximab was generally well-tolerated with expected class toxicities from HGF/cMet inhibitors observed, including common adverse events of edema and hypoalbuminemia, and an uncommon adverse event of pneumonitis. Two treatment related deaths occurred, including pneumonitis (ficlatuzumab arm) and cardiopulmonary arrest (combination arm).

A copy of the poster will be available at www.aveooncology.com after its presentation at the 2021 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting.

ASCO Presentation Details

Title: Randomized Phase II trial of ficlatuzumab with or without cetuximab in pan-refractory, advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Presenter: Julie E. Bauman, M.D., MPH, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Associate Director of Translational Research, University of Arizona Cancer Center
Abstract: 6015
Track: Head and Neck Cancer
Date and Time: June 4, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
About Ficlatuzumab

Ficlatuzumab (formerly known as AV-299) is a potent hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) inhibitory antibody that binds to the HGF ligand with high affinity and specificity. HGF is the natural ligand of c-Met and blocking HGF inhibits signaling through the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway. Ficlatuzumab is currently being evaluated in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) and metastatic pancreatic ductal cancer (PDAC).

Early amcenestrant data featured at ASCO support its potential to become a new endocrine backbone therapy for ER+/HER2- breast cancer

On May 19, 2021 Sanofi reported that Phase 1 data from the AMEERA-1 study evaluating amcenestrant, an investigational oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), will be presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting (Press release, Sanofi, MAY 19, 2021, View Source [SID1234580270]). In a pooled analysis, amcenestrant in combination with palbociclib showed encouraging antitumor activity in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These early clinical data show that the combination of amcenestrant with palbociclib achieved encouraging antitumor activity," said Sarat Chandarlapaty, M.D., Ph.D., Medical Oncologist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. "The analysis also demonstrated no clinically significant cardiac or ocular findings and an overall safety profile in line with what we saw in the monotherapy setting. It’s notable to see this kind of activity in patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer, where there is a clear need for new therapeutic options."

In this preliminary analysis from the open-label AMEERA-1 study, amcenestrant was evaluated in dose escalation cohorts (Part C) at 200mg (n=9) and 400mg (n=6) daily and in a dose expansion cohort (Part D; n=30) at 200mg daily, all in combination with a standard dose of palbociclib. Eligible patients included post-menopausal women with ER+/HER2- MBC who were pre-treated with endocrine therapy in the advanced setting for at least six months or had resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy.

In the pooled population exposed with amcenestrant at 200mg daily evaluable for response (n=35), the objective response rate (ORR) was 34% (90% CI: 21.1-49.6), with confirmed partial responses (PR) in 12/35 patients, and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 74% (90% CI: 59.4-85.9), with clinical benefit in 26/35 patients at 24 weeks. Amcenestrant 200mg daily in combination with palbociclib demonstrated a favorable overall safety profile (n=39), with treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) attributable to amcenestrant similar to those observed with monotherapy. For all grade events, amcenestrant TRAEs occurred in 72% and to palbociclib in 90% of patients, and for grade ≥3 in 15% and 46% of patients, respectively. The most frequent non-hematological amcenestrant TRAEs included fatigue (18%) and nausea (18%), all grade ≤2. No clinically significant cardiac or ocular safety findings occurred.

"The Phase 3 AMEERA-5 study was built upon promising preclinical and clinical data, including the data presented here at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper), and expands our knowledge of amcenestrant as a potential best-in-class oral endocrine backbone therapy for ER+/HER2- breast cancer," said John Reed, M.D., Ph.D., Global Head of Research and Development at Sanofi. "A significant need exists for more treatment options for ER+ breast cancer, the most common type of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 75% of all breast cancers diagnosed today."

Amcenestrant is an oral SERD that antagonizes and degrades the estrogen receptor (ER) resulting in inhibition of the ER signaling pathway. Amcenestrant is currently under clinical investigation and its safety and efficacy have not been evaluated by any regulatory authority.

Amcenestrant clinical development program

The comprehensive development program for amcenestrant has been designed to evaluate its role: (1) as a single agent in second-line or later lines of treatment of ER+/HER2- MBC, (2) in combination with palbociclib in the first-line treatment of ER+/HER2- MBC, and (3) to explore its potential in early-stage breast cancer patients in the adjuvant setting. Late last year, the Phase 3 AMEERA-5 clinical trial investigating amcenestrant in combination with palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, as a first-line therapy for patients with ER+ MBC, was initiated.

A pivotal study (AMEERA-3) of amcenestrant versus physician’s choice in locally advanced or metastatic ER+ breast cancer is fully recruited. The pivotal readout is now expected in H2 2021. Of note, the trial recently passed a Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) futility analysis.

About ER+ metastatic breast cancer

MBC is breast cancer that has spread outside the mammary gland to another part of the body, such as the liver, brain, bones or lungs. It is also known as Stage IV and is the most advanced stage of breast cancer.1 About two of every three cases of breast cancer are HR+, meaning the cancer is fueled by the hormones estrogen or progesterone.2 HR+ breast cancers can be classified as ER+ and/or progesterone receptor-positive (PR+).2 ER+ breast cancer accounts for approximately 75% of all breast cancers3 and is the most common type of breast cancer diagnosed today.4 The five-year relative survival for distant (cancer that has metastasized) female breast cancer is 28.1%.5 Endocrine therapies were among the first treatments to be administered for HR+ MBC and are considered standard of care in the first-line setting. However, new options are needed as resistance often emerges, limiting the effectiveness of these treatments for patients with metastatic disease over time.6

About the AMEERA-1 clinical trial

AMEERA-1 is an open-label, Phase 1/2, first-in-human study designed to evaluate amcenestrant as a monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapies in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- MBC. Parts A (dose escalation) and B (dose expansion) were designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of amcenestrant administered as monotherapy, while Parts C and D are evaluating dose escalation and expansion for amcenestrant in combination with palbociclib to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose for the combination and to characterize its safety profile. Primary efficacy objectives include antitumor activity by ORR and CBR per RECIST v1.1 criteria, as well as characterizing the overall safety profile of amcenestrant as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib. Eligible patients included women with histological diagnosis of breast adenocarcinoma with locally advanced or metastatic ER+/HER2- disease and at least six months of prior exposure to endocrine therapy, including patients with early relapse while on adjuvant endocrine therapy that was initiated more than 24 months ago, or who relapsed less than 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy.7

Dr. Chandarlapaty has provided consulting services to Sanofi.

MEI Pharma and Kyowa Kirin Announce New Clinical Data on Zandelisib at American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting 2021

On May 19, 2021 MEI Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: MEIP), a late-stage pharmaceutical company focused on advancing new therapies for cancer, and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. (Kyowa Kirin, TSE: 4151), a global specialty pharmaceutical company that utilizes the latest biotechnology to discover and deliver novel medicines, reported new data for zandelisib, an investigational phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta ("PI3Kδ") inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (Press release, MEI Pharma, MAY 19, 2021, View Source [SID1234580269]). The research and the design of a Phase 3 study will be presented in three posters at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2021 being held virtually June 4-8, 2021.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are encouraged by the zandelisib data being shared at this year’s ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, specifically the data that showed zandelisib activity across differing patient groups, including POD24 – a group that typically has a poor prognosis and would generally be expected to meet the inclusion criteria of our Phase 3 COASTAL study. Additionally, the data reporting on the combination of zandelisib and zanubrutinib, demonstrated the potential to induce robust and durable responses against various B-cell malignancies with a combination that is generally well-tolerated," said Richard Ghalie, M.D., chief medical officer at MEI Pharma. "With topline data from the Phase 2 TIDAL study on track to be reported by the end of this year, we remain committed, in collaboration with our global partner Kyowa Kirin, to the zandelisib development program and its potential to deliver a best-in-class treatment option to patients with B-cell malignancies as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies."

The presentations will present updated data from a Phase 1b study of zandelisib + – rituximab that show the compound continues to be generally well tolerated with an 82% overall response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) who had progression of disease within 24 months of first line chemoimmunotherapy (POD24). An overall response rate of 93% was observed in patients with r/r FL and were non-POD24. POD24 status is a robust predictor of reduced overall survival in FL patients. The response rate in all 37 r/r FL patients was 87%.

Additionally, the presentations will include new data from the Phase 1b trial exploring zandelisib in combination with zanubrutinib (marketed as BRUKINSA), an inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase ("BTK") developed by BeiGene, Ltd. ("BeiGene"), in patients with (r r) B-cell malignancies. In this study, the combination of zandelisib and zanubrutinib was generally well tolerated in the 20 patients enrolled in the safety evaluation cohort. The combination administered on an optimized dosing regimen did not result in additive toxicity to each agent alone. Further, 100% of patients (n=16) with r/r indolent B-cell malignancies and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) achieved an objective response.

The trial design for the Phase 3 COASTAL study evaluating zandelisib in combination with rituximab in patients with r r indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL), will also be highlighted in a poster presentation. The COASTAL study is intended to act as the required confirmatory study for the potential U.S. accelerated approval of zandelisib in patients with r/r FL or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who have received one or more prior lines of treatment and is also intended to support FDA approval for additional indications and regulatory marketing applications globally.

"Data from the early Phase 1 trials indicate that zandelisib displays high selectivity for the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta (PI3K) isoform as well as durability, with PI3K playing a key role in the proliferation and survival of hematologic cancers," said Yoshifumi Torii, Ph.D., Executive Officer, Vice President, Head of R&D Division of Kyowa Kirin. "Zandelisib has distinct pharmaceutical properties and we look forward to continuing the development of the compound, in partnership with MEI Pharma, with the hope that more data will add to the understanding of zandelisib and potentially yield another option for patients with B-cell malignancies."

Details on the three posters are included below.

Updated Clinical Data from the Phase 1b Study Evaluating Zandelisib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Poster title: Efficacy and Safety of the PI3Kδ Inhibitor Zandelisib (ME-401) on an Intermittent Schedule (IS) in Patients with Relapsed Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (FL) with Progression of Disease within 24 Months of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy (POD24)
Available for on-demand viewing online: Beginning on June 4, 2021 at 6:00 a.m. PT here
Poster will also be available for download via the MEI Pharma website
John Pagel, M.D., Ph.D., lead author on the poster, study investigator, and Chief of Hematologic Malignancies, Swedish Cancer Center, commented: "The group of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma patients that experience progression of disease within 24 months of first line chemoimmunotherapy have a poorer long-term prognosis compared to the patients with follicular lymphoma who relapse later than 24 months and represent an area of high need for new treatment options. The positive results reported today indicate the potential for zandelisib to provide a new treatment option for high-risk patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma."

Study Details:
The ongoing Phase 1b clinical study is a multi-arm, open-label, dose optimization trial evaluating zandelisib as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies in patients with r r B-cell malignancies. The data reported today is for patients receiving zandelisib administered on the intermittent schedule: once daily at 60 mg for two 28-day cycles and then on an intermittent schedule of once daily dosing for the first 7 days of each subsequent 28-day cycle (i.e. the intermittent schedule or IS). A total of 37 r/r FL patients have been treated with zandelisib on the intermittent schedule, as a monotherapy or in combination with rituximab. Of the 37 r/r FL patients, 22 were POD24. POD24 is a robust predictor in FL of reduced overall survival.

The overall response rate in 37 patients with r r FL was 87% with 27% achieving a complete response. The overall response rate in POD24 patients was 82% and 93% in non-POD24 patients. The complete response rate in POD24 patients was 18% and 40% in non-POD24 patients.

Overall Response Rate


All

(N = 37)

POD24

(n = 22)

Non-POD24

(n = 15)

ORR, n (%)*

32 (87)

18 (82)

14 (93)

Monotherapy, n N (%)

Combination with rituximab, n N (%)

14 18 (78)

18 19 (95)

8 11 (73)

10 11 (91)

6 7 (86)

8 8 (100)

Prior lines of therapy, n N (%)

1 line of prior therapy

≥ 2 lines of prior therapy

14 16 (88)

18 21 (86)

5 7 (71)

13 15 (87)

9 9 (100)

5 6 (83)

CR rate, n (%)

10 (27)

4 (18)

6 (40)

* Imaging scans were obtained after 2 and 6 cycles, and then every 6 cycles. Response was reported based on Lugano criteria.

Duration of Response
Median duration of response in POD24 and non-POD24 patients has not yet been reached. Median duration follow-up is 15.8 months (range: 5.6-33.1) in POD24 patients and 17 months (range: 1.2-28.6) in non-POD24.

Follow-up = Time from first response to treatment discontinuation date or data cutoff of 10DEC2020 for ongoing patients

Follow-up = Time from first response to treatment discontinuation date or data cutoff of 10DEC2020 for ongoing patients

Progression Free Survival
Progression free survival in POD24 patients is 12.5 months and in the non-POD24 group the median is not yet reached. Median follow-up time in the POD24 and non-POD24 groups is 19.4 (range 1.8-36.5) and 18.2 (range: 3.0-30.4) months, respectively.

Follow-up = Time from first day on study to treatment discontinuation or data cutoff of 10DEC2020

Follow-up = Time from first day on study to treatment discontinuation or data cutoff of 10DEC2020

Adverse Events
Zandelisib was generally well-tolerated. No difference in adverse events was observed between POD24 and non-POD24 groups. The discontinuation rate due to any treatment emergent adverse event was 8% (n=3), and the incidence of Grade ≥ 3 TEAE was as follows:

Grade ≥3 Adverse Events in ≥2 Patients

N = 37

N (%)

Neutropenia

6 (16)

ALT AST increased

3 (8)

Rash

3 (8)

Diarrhea

2 (5)

Colitis

2 (5)

Hypokalemia

2 (5)

Hyponatremia

2 (5)

Coronavirus infection

2 (5)

Phase 1b Study Evaluating Zandelisib in Combination with Zanubrutinib in Patients with B-cell Malignancies

Poster title: Initial Results of the Combination of PI3Kδ Inhibitor Zandelisib (ME-401) and the BTK Inhibitor Zanubrutinib in Patients (pts) with r r B-cell Malignancies
Available for on-demand viewing online: Beginning on June 4, 2021 at 6:00 a.m. PT here.
Poster will also be available for download via the MEI Pharma website
Jacob Soumerai, M.D., lead author on the poster, study investigator and Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, commented: "The data reported today for zandelisib in combination with zanubrutinib are encouraging, both in terms of preliminary safety and efficacy, and support the expansion of the evaluation of this orally administered combination in various B-cell malignancies."

Study Details
The ongoing Phase 1b clinical study is a multi-arm, open-label, dose optimization trial evaluating zandelisib as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies in patients with r r B-cell malignancies. The data reported today is for 20 patients receiving zandelisib in combination with zanubrutinib. Two treatment dosing regimens were explored: Group A received zandelisib 60 mg, oral, daily continuously for 8 weeks followed by days 1-7 of each subsequent 28-day cycle, and zanubrutinib (marketed as BRUKINSA by BeiGene, Ltd.), 160 mg oral, twice daily; Group B received zandelisib 60 mg, oral, daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle starting Cycle 1 and zanubrutinib 80 mg, oral, twice daily. Group A enrolled a total of 7 patients: 1 FL, 3 CLL, 1 MZL, 1 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 1 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/high grade B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL/HGBCL). Group B enrolled a total of 13 patients: 7 FL, 2 CLL, 1 MZL, and 3 DLBCL HGBCL. Treatment was continued until disease progression, intolerance or withdrawal of consent.

Overall Response Rates
The overall response rate in all evaluable patients with r r indolent B-cell malignancies and CLL was 100%. No response was noted in the 2 patients with DLBCL/HGBCL. Responses were durable with median follow up of 6.6 months (0.6-21.3) with the majority of responders still on treatment.

Evaluable

n = 18

FL
(n = 8)

CLL SLL
(n = 5)

MZL
(n = 2)

MCL
(n = 1)

DLBCL HGBCL
(n = 2)

ORR*, n (%)

8 (100)

5 (100)

2 (100)

1 (100)

0

Group A

1 (100)

3 (100)

1 (100)

1 (100)

0

Group B

7 (100)

2 (100)

1 (100)

0

0

*CR CRi in 2/8 FL (25%) and 2/5 CLL (40%). Imaging scans at month 3, 7, 13, and then every 6 months until progression. Response reported based on Lugano criteria and iwCLL. 2/20 patients (1 DLBCL, 1 HGBCL) did not have on-therapy scans: 1 had clinical PD and 1 had AE due to prior therapy and discontinued early. Median follow-up time was 6.6 months for all patients (range 0.6-21.3), 3.6 months for Group A (range 0.6-21.3), and 6.6 months for Group B (range 1.9-14.1).

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
The combination of zandelisib 60 mg oral, daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle starting Cycle 1 and zanubrutinib 80 mg, oral, twice daily was well tolerated across the various B-cell malignancies in the completed part of the study. The combination administered on the optimized, Group B, dosing regimen did not result in additive toxicity to each agent alone. One of the two patients with Grade 3 AST ALT increases in Group B was successfully retreated and continued therapy.


Group A

(n = 7)

Group B

(n = 13)

Adverse Event, n (%)

All Grades

Grade ≥ 3

All Grades

Grade ≥ 3

Neutropenia

4 (57)

*3 (43)

6 (46)

3 (23)

ALT increased

2 (29)

2 (29)

2 (15)

**2 (15)

AST increased

2 (29)

2 (29)

3 (23)

**2 (15)

Anemia

1 (14)

*1 (14)

2 (15)

1 (8)

Hyperkalemia

2 (29)

0

2 (15)

1 (8)

Thrombocytopenia

4 (57)

*2 (29)

3 (23)

1 (8)

Pleural Effusion

2 (29)

*1 (14)

0

0

Rash

1 (14)

1 (14)

2 (15)

0

Appendicitis

0

0

1 (8)

1 (8)

Ascites

1 (14)

*1 (14)

0

0

CMV colitis

1 (14)

1 (14)

0

0

Fatigue

4 (57)

1 (14)

2 (15)

0

Pneumonia

2 (29)

*1 (14)

0

0

Tumor lysis syndrome

0

0

1 (8)

1 (8)

Diarrhea

3 (43)

0

3 (23)

0

Atrial fibrillation

1 (14)

0

0

0

* Group A: 1 DLBCL patient experienced Grade 3 AE on Day 0 attributed to prior therapy and discontinued treatment on Day 17, then progressed on Day 23 and died with Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and pleural effusion, Grade 3 pneumonia, anemia, and ascites. ** Group B: DLT.

This Phase 1b study is continuing to enroll expansion cohorts in r r FL and MCL to further evaluate the combination of zandelisib 60 mg administered on days 1-7 starting Cycle 1 and zanubrutinib administered at 80 mg bid.

COASTAL Phase 3 Study Design

Poster title: Coastal: A phase 3 study of the PI3Kδ inhibitor zandelisib with rituximab (R) versus immunochemotherapy in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL)
Available for on-demand viewing online: Beginning on June 4, 2021 at 6:00 a.m. PT here.
Poster will also be available for download via the MEI Pharma website
The global, randomized, two-arm Phase 3 study will compare zandelisib plus rituximab to standard of care chemotherapy plus rituximab, is expected to enroll 534 patients, and the primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival. Zandelisib will be administered once daily for two 28-day cycles followed by an intermittent schedule of once daily dosing for one week of each subsequent 28-day cycle.

"As a potent, highly selective inhibitor of the PI3Kδ isoform, zandelisib has a differentiated therapeutic profile that makes it an ideal candidate to evaluate in different B-cell malignancies, both as a monotherapy and combined with other agents" said Professor Wojciech Jurczak, M.D., Ph.D., COASTAL principal investigator, Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Kraków, Poland. "The initiation of the COASTAL study will be an important milestone as we evaluate zandelisib’s potential as a best-in-class PI3Kδ therapy, optimized by a unique dosing schedule."

Clinical study of zandelisib as a monotherapy or in combination with other agents support its clinical development for B-cell malignancies. In clinical studies, zandelisib administered as a 2-month induction followed by intermittent schedule maintenance dosing achieved an 83-89% response rate, with median duration of response not reached in r r follicular and marginal zone lymphomas when given as a monotherapy or in combination with rituximab. Durable responses have been reached in patients treated with zandelisib as either a monotherapy or in combination, regardless of prior therapies or tumor bulk. Utilizing an optimized dosing schedule of zandelisib, there has been less than 10% of Grade 3 or higher immune-mediated adverse events of special interest associated with PI3Kδ inhibitors in patients with B-cell malignancies. Zandelisib is currently in the Phase 2 TIDAL study as a monotherapy for patients with r/r follicular or marginal zone lymphoma. The COASTAL study enrollment is expected to be initiated around mid-2021.

About Zandelisib
Zandelisib (formerly called ME-401), a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, is an investigational cancer treatment being developed as an oral, once-daily, treatment for patients with B-cell malignancies. In March 2020 the U.S. FDA granted zandelisib Fast Track designation for treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who have received at least 2 prior systemic therapies.

In April 2020, MEI and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. (Kyowa Kirin) entered a global license, development, and commercialization agreement to further develop and commercialize zandelisib. MEI and Kyowa Kirin are co-developing and co-promoting zandelisib in the U.S., with MEI booking all revenue from the U.S. sales. Kyowa Kirin has exclusive commercialization rights outside of the U.S.

Ongoing clinical studies of zandelisib include TIDAL (Trials of PI3K DeltA in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma), a global Phase 2 study evaluating zandelisib as a monotherapy across two study arms: the first study arm for the treatment of adults with relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma and the second study arm for marginal zone lymphomas, in both cases after failure of at least two prior systemic therapies including chemotherapy and an anti-CD20 antibody. The primary endpoint of the study is the objective response rate. Subject to the results and discussions with FDA, data from each study arm are intended to be submitted to FDA to support separate accelerated approval marketing applications under 21 CFR Part 314.500, Subpart H.

Also ongoing is a Phase 2 pivotal study in Japan in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) without small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) conducted by Kyowa Kirin.

About PI3K Delta
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta ("PI3Kδ") is often overexpressed in cancer cells and plays a key role in the proliferation and survival of hematologic cancers. Zandelisib displays high selectivity for the PI3K delta isoform and has distinct pharmaceutical properties from other PI3K delta inhibitors.

About Follicular Lymphoma
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma, comprising about 20-30% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The disease also forms on B cells, is chronic in most cases and tends to progress slowly. Most people diagnosed with FL are over 65 years of age. Sometimes follicular lymphomas can change into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a fast-growing (aggressive) type of NHL.

Sierra Oncology Announces Abstracts Accepted for American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting

On May 19, 2021 Sierra Oncology, Inc. (SRRA), a late-stage biopharmaceutical company on a quest to deliver targeted therapies that treat rare forms of cancer, reported three abstracts have been accepted into the program for the 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) being held virtually from June 4-8, 2021 (Press release, Sierra Oncology, MAY 19, 2021, View Source [SID1234580268]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Association of Transfusion Independence with Improved Overall Survival in Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Momelotinib

Dr. Ruben Mesa, MD, Director of the Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio, MD Anderson Cancer Center, will present a poster examining the association between transfusion independence and overall survival for momelotinib patients from SIMPLIFY-1 (JAKi-naïve) and SIMPLIFY-2 (JAKi-exposed).

Previously published data from both SIMPLIFY studies demonstrate robust overall survival for momelotinib-treated patients compared to survival in patients randomized to ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY-1) or best available therapy (SIMPLIFY-2), followed by momelotinib after week 24 in each (median not yet reached in SIMPLIFY-1 and 34.3 months in SIMPLIFY-2). Additionally, previously reported week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher in the momelotinib arms of SIMPLIFY-1 (67% vs. 49%) and SIMPLIFY-2 (43% vs. 21%). The new analyses suggest JAKi-naïve patients receiving momelotinib who maintain or achieve transfusion independence at week 24 have favorable overall survival compared to non-responders, with a similar trend observed in SIMPLIFY-2.

The full abstract is now available on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) website. Data from this analysis will also be included in an oral presentation at the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) Annual Meeting being held virtually June 9-17, 2021.

Presentation Details

Abstract: 7046
Title: Association of transfusion independence with improved overall survival in myelofibrosis patients receiving momelotinib
Presenter: Ruben Mesa, MD
Poster Session Name: Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Allotransplant
Virtual Presentation Available: Friday, June 4, 2021 beginning at 8:00 am CDT

Two additional momelotinib abstracts were accepted for online publication at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper). The first highlights the improved transfusion independence of momelotinib irrespective of baseline degree of anemia, platelet count or transfusion status. The second examines the improvement in longitudinal and individual symptoms for myelofibrosis patients treated with momelotinib in the SIMPLIFY-1 study.

Improved Transfusion Independence Rates for Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Anemic JAKi Naïve Myelofibrosis Patients Independent of Baseline Platelet or Transfusion Status

Progressive anemia is a common occurrence in myelofibrosis, with nearly all patients requiring transfusions as their disease advances. As described above, the analyses in Abstract 7046 show that JAKi-naïve patients receiving momelotinib who maintain or achieve transfusion independence at week 24 have favorable overall survival compared to non-responders, with a similar trend observed in SIMPLIFY-2. Therefore, it is important to understand which patients are most likely to achieve transfusion independence at week 24.

Abstract e19039 will highlight new analyses from SIMPLIFY-1 to demonstrate that the prognostically important week 24 transfusion independence rates in JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis patients were consistently higher in anemic patients receiving momelotinib compared to ruxolitinib, regardless of the platelet count, transfusion status or degree of anemia at baseline. Data to be featured further support the potential benefits of inhibiting ACVR1 / ALK2 in addition to JAK1 and JAK2 in myelofibrosis patients, as published by Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, MD, PhD, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, Paris Diderot University; Consultant Hematologist, Head, Clinical Investigation Center, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.

The full abstract is now available on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) website. Data from this analysis will also be included in a poster presentation at the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) Annual Meeting being held virtually June 9-17, 2021.

Presentation Details

Abstract: e19039
Title: Improved Transfusion Independence Rates for Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Anemic JAKi Naïve Myelofibrosis Patients Independent of Baseline Platelet or Transfusion Status
Presenter: Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, MD, PhD

Longitudinal and Individual Symptom Analyses of Momelotinib and Ruxolitinib Treated Myelofibrosis Patients from SIMPLIFY-1

Previously reported results from the SIMPLIFY-1 study examining momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib in JAKi-naïve myelofibrosis patients did not meet the secondary endpoint of non-inferiority of >50% total symptom score (TSS) reduction at week 24 (momelotinib 28% vs ruxolitinib 42%). Abstract e19040 seeks to better understand the impact of momelotinib relative to ruxolitinib on 7 individual symptom items and the total symptom score (TSS).

Baseline scores across the 7 individual items included in the TSS were heterogenous in both the momelotinib and ruxolitinib groups. Scores for 6 of the 7 items were more severe or very severe (scores 7-10) in the momelotinib arm, relative to ruxolitinib, at baseline. Despite the imbalance in baseline score, item-level health state shifts showed similar improvement for momelotinib and ruxolitinib. Mean TSS improvements were also similar for momelotinib and ruxolitinib. Mean TSS change at week 24 was 6.35 for momelotinib vs. 7.87 for ruxolitinib in the ITT and was 8.80 for momelotinib vs. 10.46 for ruxolitinib in the symptomatic subset. The between-group difference was 1.52 (95% CI: (0.196, 2.847)) in the ITT and 1.67 (95% CI: -0.134, 3.468) in the symptomatic subset.

The comparable item health state shifts at week 24 and similar improvements in mean TSS, with a minimal between-group difference of 1.52 on the 70-point scale, suggest momelotinib provides clinically relevant and comparable symptom improvements to ruxolitinib. The full abstract is now available on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) website.

Presentation Details

Abstract: e19040
Title: Longitudinal and Individual Symptom Analyses of Momelotinib and Ruxolitinib Treated Myelofibrosis Patients from SIMPLIFY-1
Presenter: Ruben Mesa, MD, PhD

Seagen and Astellas Announce Updated Results from Two Trials of PADCEV® (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Not Eligible for Cisplatin Chemotherapy

On May 19, 2021 Seagen Inc.(Nasdaq:SGEN) and Astellas Pharma Inc. (TSE: 4503, President and CEO: Kenji Yasukawa, Ph.D., "Astellas") reported updated results from two clinical trials examining PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) alone (EV-201 Cohort 2) and PADCEV in combination with Merck’s (known as MSD outside the United States and Canada) KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) (EV-103 Cohort A) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who are not able to receive cisplatin chemotherapy (Press release, Seagen, MAY 19, 2021, View Source [SID1234580267]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"EV-201 Cohort 2 is the first study to report objective responses in patients with advanced urothelial cancer that progressed following immunotherapy and who have medical conditions that prevent them from receiving cisplatin chemotherapy," said Andrew Krivoshik, M.D., Ph.D., Senior Vice President and Oncology Therapeutic Area Head, Astellas. "The analysis that will be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) showed that after a median follow-up of 16 months, many patients continued to benefit from PADCEV – an important finding for these patients, who have very limited treatment options."

"EV-103 is the first clinical trial to combine the antibody-drug conjugate PADCEV with Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapy KEYTRUDA in patients newly diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer," said Roger Dansey, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Seagen. "The updated data from EV-103 Cohort A, with two years of follow-up, build upon findings from the initial analysis, showing continued durability for this platinum-free combination."

Enfortumab vedotin in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who received prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: An updated analysis of EV-201 Cohort 2(Abstract 4524)

Patients in Cohort 2 of EV-201 received prior treatment with an immunotherapy but had not received a platinum-containing chemotherapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting and were ineligible for cisplatin chemotherapy.

With a median follow-up of 16 months, 51 percent of patients who received PADCEV had a confirmed objective response [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 39.8, 61.3] per blinded independent central review (the primary endpoint), with 22 percent of patients experiencing a complete response (CR). Median duration of response (DOR) was 13.8 months [95% CI: 6.4, not reached]. Patients lived a median of 6.7 months without cancer progression [progression-free survival (PFS) (95% CI: 5.0-8.3)] and had a median overall survival (OS) of 16.1 months (95% CI: 11.3, 24.1).

The most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were alopecia (51%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (49%) and fatigue (34%), and the most common Grade 3 or greater TRAEs were neutropenia (9%), maculopapular rash (8%) and fatigue (7%). Grade 3 or greater TRAEs of special interest included skin reactions (17%), peripheral neuropathy (8%) and hyperglycemia (6%). Four deaths were previously reported as treatment-related by investigators in patients age 75 years and older with multiple comorbidities.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently granted Priority Review to a supplemental application for PADCEV based on the primary analysis from EV-201 Cohort 2, which was published this month inThe Lancet Oncology.

Study EV-103: Update on durability results and long-term outcome of enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab in first-line locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC)(Abstract 4528)

In the dose-escalation cohort and expansion Cohort A in EV-103, patients were treated with a combination of PADCEV and the anti-PD-1 therapy KEYTRUDA as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Participants were ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, had no prior systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease, and did not receive adjuvant/neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy within 12 months prior to enrollment.

The primary outcome measure in this analysis was safety. With a median follow-up of 24.9 months, the longer-term analysis demonstrated a safety profile generally consistent with previous findings with no new safety signals observed. The most common TRAEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy (55.6%), fatigue (51.1%) and alopecia (48.9%), and the most common Grade 3 or greater TRAEs were increased lipase (17.8%), maculopapular rash (11.1%) and fatigue (11.1%). Grade 3 or greater TRAEs of interest included skin reactions (20%), hyperglycemia (8.9%) and peripheral neuropathy (4.4%). There was one death previously reported as possibly related to study treatment (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome).

As previously reported, results demonstrated an objective response rate of 73.3 percent (95% CI: 58.1, 85.4) per investigator assessment, with 15.6 percent of patients experiencing a CR. The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% CI: 8.0, not reached). With longer-term follow-up, the study showed a median DOR of 25.6 months (95% CI: 8.3, not reached) and median OS of 26.1 months (95% CI: 15.7, not reached).

The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation last year for the PADCEV and KEYTRUDA combination for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who are unable to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line setting.

About Urothelial Cancer

Urothelial cancer is the most common type of bladder cancer (90 percent of cases) and can also be found in the renal pelvis (where urine collects inside the kidney), ureter (tube that connects the kidneys to the bladder) and urethra.1 Globally, approximately 573,000 new cases of bladder cancer and more than 212,000 deaths are reported annually.2

About the EV-201 Trial

The EV-201 trial (NCT03219333) is a single-arm, dual-cohort, pivotal phase 2 clinical trial of enfortumab vedotin for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who have been previously treated with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, including those who have also been treated with a platinum-containing chemotherapy (Cohort 1) and those who have not received a platinum-containing chemotherapy in this setting and who are ineligible for cisplatin (Cohort 2). The trial enrolled 128 patients in Cohort 1 and 91 patients in Cohort 2 at multiple centers internationally.1 The primary endpoint is confirmed objective response rate per blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include assessments of duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety and tolerability.

About the EV-103 Trial

EV-103 (NCT03288545) is an ongoing, multi-cohort, open-label, multicenter phase 1b/2 trial of PADCEV alone or in combination, evaluating safety, tolerability and efficacy in muscle invasive urothelial cancer, and in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in first- or second-line settings.

The dose-escalation cohort and expansion Cohort A include locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer patients who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were dosed in a 21-day cycle, receiving an intravenous (IV) infusion of enfortumab vedotin on Days 1 and 8 and pembrolizumab on Day 1. At the time of the initial analysis, 45 patients (5 from the dose-escalation cohort and 40 from the dose-expansion Cohort A) with locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial cancer had been treated with enfortumab vedotin (1.25 mg/kg) plus pembrolizumab in the first-line setting.

The primary outcome measure of the cohorts included in this analysis is safety. Key secondary objectives related to efficacy include objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival.

Additional enrolling cohorts in the EV-103 study include:

PADCEV as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab in a first-line setting for locally advanced or metastatic disease, in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (Cohort K)
PADCEV as a monotherapy in muscle-invasive disease (Cohort L)
About PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv)

PADCEV was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2019 and is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who have previously received a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor and a platinum-containing chemotherapy before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) surgery or in a locally advanced or metastatic setting. PADCEV was approved under the FDA’s Accelerated Approval Program based on tumor response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.3

PADCEV is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that is directed against Nectin-4, a protein located on the surface of cells and highly expressed in bladder cancer.3,4 Nonclinical data suggest the anticancer activity of PADCEV is due to its binding to Nectin-4 expressing cells followed by the internalization and release of the anti-tumor agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) into the cell, which result in the cell not reproducing (cell cycle arrest) and in programmed cell death (apoptosis).4 PADCEV is co-developed by Astellas and Seagen.

PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) U.S. Important Safety Information

Warnings and Precautions

Skin reactions: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including fatal cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. SJS and TEN occurred predominantly during the first cycle of treatment but may occur later.

Skin reactions occurred in 54% of the 310 patients treated with PADCEV in clinical trials. Twenty-six percent (26%) of patients had maculopapular rash and 30% had pruritus. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 10% of patients and included symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), dermatitis bullous, dermatitis exfoliative, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. In one clinical trial, the median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 0.8 months (range: 0.2 to 5.3). Of the patients who experienced rash, 65% had complete resolution and 22% had partial improvement. Monitor patients closely throughout treatment for skin reactions. Consider topical corticosteroids and antihistamines as clinically indicated. Withhold PADCEV and consider referral for specialized care for severe (Grade 3) skin reactions, suspected SJS, or TEN. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients with confirmed SJS or TEN; or Grade 4 or recurrent Grade 3 skin reactions.

Hyperglycemia occurred in patients treated with PADCEV, including death and diabetic ketoacidosis, in those with and without pre-existing diabetes mellitus. The incidence of Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia increased consistently in patients with higher body mass index and in patients with higher baseline A1C. In one clinical trial, 8% of patients developed Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia. Patients with baseline hemoglobin A1C ≥8% were excluded. Closely monitor blood glucose levels in patients with, or at risk for, diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia. If blood glucose is elevated (>250 mg/dL), withhold PADCEV.

Peripheral neuropathy (PN), predominantly sensory, occurred in 49% of the 310 patients treated with PADCEV in clinical trials; 2% experienced Grade 3 reactions. In one clinical trial, peripheral neuropathy occurred in patients treated with PADCEV with or without preexisting peripheral neuropathy. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 was 3.8 months (range: 0.6 to 9.2). Neuropathy led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of patients. At the time of their last evaluation, 19% had complete resolution, and 26% had partial improvement. Monitor patients for symptoms of new or worsening peripheral neuropathy and consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV when peripheral neuropathy occurs. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients that develop Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy.

Ocular disorders occurred in 46% of the 310 patients treated with PADCEV. The majority of these events involved the cornea and included keratitis, blurred vision, limbal stem cell deficiency and other events associated with dry eyes. Dry eye symptoms occurred in 36% of patients, and blurred vision occurred in 14% of patients, during treatment with PADCEV. The median time to onset to symptomatic ocular disorder was 1.9 months (range: 0.3 to 6.2). Monitor patients for ocular disorders. Consider artificial tears for prophylaxis of dry eyes and ophthalmologic evaluation if ocular symptoms occur or do not resolve. Consider treatment with ophthalmic topical steroids, if indicated after an ophthalmic exam. Consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV for symptomatic ocular disorders.

Infusion site extravasation: Skin and soft tissue reactions secondary to extravasation have been observed after administration of PADCEV. Of the 310 patients, 1.3% of patients experienced skin and soft tissue reactions. Reactions may be delayed. Erythema, swelling, increased temperature, and pain worsened until 2-7 days after extravasation and resolved within 1-4 weeks of peak. One percent (1%) of patients developed extravasation reactions with secondary cellulitis, bullae, or exfoliation. Ensure adequate venous access prior to starting PADCEV and monitor for possible extravasation during administration. If extravasation occurs, stop the infusion and monitor for adverse reactions.

Embryo-fetal toxicity: PADCEV can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise patients of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise female patients of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during PADCEV treatment and for 2 months after the last dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with PADCEV and for 4 months after the last dose.

Adverse Reactions

Serious adverse reactions occurred in 46% of patients treated with PADCEV. The most common serious adverse reactions (≥3%) were urinary tract infection (6%), cellulitis (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%), diarrhea (4%), sepsis (3%), acute kidney injury (3%), dyspnea (3%), and rash (3%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.2% of patients, including acute respiratory failure, aspiration pneumonia, cardiac disorder, and sepsis (each 0.8%).

Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 16% of patients; the most common adverse reaction leading to discontinuation was peripheral neuropathy (6%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 64% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to dose interruption were peripheral neuropathy (18%), rash (9%) and fatigue (6%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 34% of patients; the most common adverse reactions leading to dose reduction were peripheral neuropathy (12%), rash (6%) and fatigue (4%).

The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were fatigue (56%), peripheral neuropathy (56%), decreased appetite (52%), rash (52%), alopecia (50%), nausea (45%), dysgeusia (42%), diarrhea (42%), dry eye (40%), pruritus (26%) and dry skin (26%). The most common Grade ≥3 adverse reactions (≥5%) were rash (13%), diarrhea (6%) and fatigue (6%).

Lab Abnormalities

In one clinical trial, Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities reported in ≥5% were: lymphocytes decreased (10%), hemoglobin decreased (10%), phosphate decreased (10%), lipase increased (9%), sodium decreased (8%), glucose increased (8%), urate increased (7%), neutrophils decreased (5%).

Drug Interactions

Effects of other drugs on PADCEV Concomitant use with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor may increase free MMAE exposure, which may increase the incidence or severity of PADCEV toxicities. Closely monitor patients for signs of toxicity when PADCEV is given concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Specific Populations

Lactation Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with PADCEV and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose.

Hepatic impairment Avoid the use of PADCEV in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.