Phase 3 Trial of Rova-T as Second-line Therapy for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer (TAHOE Study) Halted

On December 5, 2018 AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV), a research-based global biopharmaceutical company, reported the decision to stop enrollment for the TAHOE trial, a Phase 3 study evaluating Rovalpituzumab Tesirine (Rova-T) as a second-line therapy for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Press release, AbbVie, DEC 5, 2018, View Source [SID1234531917]). An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) recommended stopping enrollment in TAHOE due to shorter overall survival in the Rova-T arm compared with the topotecan control arm. For patients currently on treatment with Rova-T in TAHOE, the IDMC recommended that investigators and patients make individual decisions as to whether or not to continue treatment based on patient level response. The recommendation from the IDMC to halt enrollment applies only to the TAHOE study and does not impact other Rova-T clinical studies.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Patients are our first priority and we are deeply grateful to the patients and physicians who participated in this trial," said Michael Severino, M.D., executive vice president, research and development and chief scientific officer, AbbVie. "We remain committed to discovering and developing transformative therapies for people living with cancer."

About the TAHOE Trial
The TAHOE trial is a randomized, open-label, two-arm, Phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Rova-T versus topotecan in participants with advanced or metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with high levels of delta-like protein 3 (DLL3) and who have first disease progression during or following front-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

About Rovalpituzumab Tesirine (Rova-T)
Rova-T is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate targeting the cancer-stem cell-associated delta-like protein 3 (DLL3)1, which is expressed in more than 80 percent of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patient tumors, where it is prevalent on tumor cells, including cancer stem cells, but not present in healthy tissue.2 Rova-T combines a targeted antibody that delivers a cytotoxic agent directly to the DLL3-expressing cancer cells while minimizing toxicity to healthy cells. Rova-T is under investigation as a third-line treatment in SCLC.2 The expression of DLL3 suggests Rova-T may be useful across multiple tumor types, including metastatic melanoma, glioblastoma multiforme and some prostate, pancreatic and colorectal cancers.2

Rova-T is an investigational compound and its efficacy and safety have not been established by the FDA or any other health authority.

Apexian Pharmaceuticals Presents Data on Their Lead Drug for Anti-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), APX3330, at ASCO Palliative Care and Symptom Management Meeting

On December 5, 2018 Apexian Pharmaceuticals reported that Chemotherapy causes chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in a significant number of patients, yet the pharmaceutical landscape is completely devoid of treatments to prevent CIPN (Press release, Apexian Pharmaceuticals, DEC 5, 2018, View Source [SID1234531916]). The tingling, burning, pain or numbness in the extremities can limit or stop cancer treatment. And, in half the patients affected, CIPN’s symptoms persist five years or more after treatment ends. Apexian Pharmaceuticals aims to change that with their lead compound, APX3330.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Data presented at the meeting showed continued preclinical support for APX3330 as a potential anti-CIPN treatment, particularly for patients treated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin. Preclinical results presented show APX3330 can block tumor growth while protecting nerve cells.

APX3330, an oral treatment, is currently in a Phase I oncology trial for safety. A Phase II trial is planned in 2019 for anti-tumor and anti-CIPN.

Apexian’s founder and Chief Science Officer, Mark Kelley, PhD, presented the trial’s results in ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)’s Symptom Management Meeting in San Diego, November 16-18, 2018.

Currently ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) does not recommend any drug for preventing or treating CIPN.

"CIPN is a disease with high unmet need and it is exciting to see that APX3330 may have a role to play in addressing the need," says Steve Carchedi, President & CEO of Apexian. "We are committed to developing a portfolio of novel APE1/Ref-1 compounds that will enhance the lives of patients."

The success of APX3330 builds upon three decades of research by Kelley and his colleagues in modulating a key DNA repair protein, APE1/Ref-1. APX3330 tweaks the protein’s activity to prevent or repair neuronal damage without stimulating cancerous tumors.

APX3330 is Apexian’s lead compound in its growing drug development pipeline.

Transgene Announces Upcoming Investor Meetings

On December 5, 2018 Transgene (Paris:TNG) reported that Management will participate in the upcoming investor events set out below (Press release, Transgene, DEC 5, 2018, View Source [SID1234531915]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Transgene will meet institutional investors at the LifeSci Advisors Corporate Access Event from January 7 to 9, 2019, in San Francisco, USA, concurrent with the J.P. Morgan Healthcare conference.

The Company will also attend:

Oddo Forum: January 10 & 11, 2019 – Lyon, France
Biomed Event: January 22, 2019 – Paris, France
Degroof Petercam Healthcare Seminar: January 31, 2019 – Brussels, Belgium
HC Wainwright Conference: April 8 & 9, 2019 – London, UK
Kempen Life Sciences Conference: April 16 & 17, 2019 – Amsterdam, Netherlands
Small Cap Event: April 16 & 17, 2019 – Paris, France

The phase 3 study of Darzalex ® ▼ (daratumumab) shows efficacy and safety data of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody in patients with recently diagnosed multiple myeloma

On December 5, 2018 Janssen pharmaceutical companies at Johnson & Johnson reported the results of the MAIA phase 3 study, which shows that the addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) significantly reduced the risk of progression of the disease or death in patients with recently diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not suitable for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) ( abstract # LBA-2 ) (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, DEC 5, 2018, View Source [SID1234531914]). 1 These data were presented during the oral session of last-minute last-minute summaries at the 60th annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) in San Diego, California.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"The Phase 3 MAIA study reinforces the clinical profile of daratumumab in combination with a standard treatment regimen for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who are not eligible for transplantation," states Thierry Facon, MD, Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France and principal investigator. "The positive data show the potential role of daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone as a new important therapeutic approach for this patient population."

At a mean follow-up of 28 months, data from the phase 3 MAIA study showed that daratumumab in combination with Rd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death of the disease by 44 percent in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are not fit for transplantation, compared to treatment with Rd alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.73, p <0.0001). 1 The median progression free survival (PFS) for daratumumab-Rd has not yet been achieved, compared to 31.9 months for patients who received Rd alone. oneThe incorporation of daratumumab resulted in deeper responses with respect to Rd alone, including increased rates of complete response (CR) or higher (48 percent vs. 25 percent) and improved rates of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (79 percent, versus 53 percent). 1 Daratumumab-Rd induced a 3-fold higher rate of negativity to minimal residual disease (MRD) compared to those who received Rd alone (24 percent vs. 7 percent). one

"Estos datos subrayan el perfil clínico estable observado en los pacientes recién diagnosticados con mieloma múltiple que reciben terapia con daratumumab, incluso para aquellos que no son aptos para el trasplante", comenta la Dra. Catherine Taylor, directora del área de terapia hematológica para Europa, Oriente Medio y África (EMEA) de Janssen-Cilag Limited. "Es el tercer estudio en pacientes recientemente diagnosticados que ha alcanzado su principal criterio de evaluación y esperamos continuar proporcionando avances innovadores a pacientes con mieloma múltiple a través de nuestro robusto programa de investigación clínica, que cuenta con el potencial de revolucionar el tratamiento del cáncer atacando a la enfermedad en sus etapas más tempranas", añade Taylor.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse events arising from treatment (TEAE) for daratumumab-Rd (≥ 10 percent) included neutropenia (50 percent), lymphopenia (15 percent), pneumonia (14 percent), and anemia (12 percent). 1 Infusion-related reactions (RRI) occurred in 41 percent of patients, of whom only 3 percent were grade 3/4. 1 The incidence of invasive secondary neoplasms was 3 percent in the daratumumab-Rd group, compared to 4 percent with Rd alone. 1 TEAEs with a death result were 7 percent in the daratumumab group, compared to 6 percent in the Rd group.1 The safety profile of daratumumab was in line with that of previous studies. one

These data will support a future marketing authorization request for daratumumab in combination with Rd for this patient population.

#FINISH#

About the MAIA 1 trial

The randomized, open-label, multi-center phase 3 study included 737 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 45 and 90 years (mean age 73). Patients were randomly assigned to receive daratumumab-Rd or Rd only in cycles of 28 days. In the daratumumab-Rd treatment group, patients received IV daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilogram (mg / kg) weekly for cycles 1 – 2, every two weeks for cycles 3-6 and every 4 weeks for cycle 7 and later. Patients in the daratumumab-Rd and Rd treatment group received 25 mg of lenalidomide on days 1 – 21 of each 28-day cycle and dexamethasone at 40 mg once per week for each cycle.

About daratumumab

Daratumumab is a first-generation biologic drug against the CD38 antigen, a protein that is expressed at high levels on the surface of multiple myeloma tumor cells, regardless of the stage of the disease. 2 Daratumumab induces rapid death of cancer cells through multiple immunologically mediated mechanisms of action, including complementary cytotoxicity (CDC), cellular cytotoxicity by antibody dependence (ADCC), cellular phagocytosis by antibody dependence (ADCP) and apoptosis , in which a series of molecular steps in a cell leads to its death. 3 Daratumumab also reduced a subset of suppressor cells of myeloid origin (CD38 + MDSCs), CD38 + T regulatory cells (Tregs) and CD38 + B (Bregs). 3 Currently daratumumab is under study through a comprehensive clinical development program on different treatments for multiple myeloma, including parameters such as first-line treatment and relapse. 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 Likewise, there are additional studies in progress or planned in order to study their potential in malignant or premalignant hematological diseases in which the CD38 protein is expressed, such as latent myeloma. . 12-13 For more information, see www.clinicaltrials.gov.

In Europe, daratumumab is currently indicated for use in combination with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for an autologous stem cell transplant, whose previous treatment included an inhibitor of the proteasome and an immunomodulatory agent, and that they would have demonstrated a progression of the disease in the last treatment and in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone or bortezomib and dexamethasone, for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one previous therapy 3 . For more information on daratumumab, see the Summary of Product Characteristics inView Source .

In August 2012 , Janssen Biotech, Inc. and Genmab A / S signed a worldwide agreement that awarded Janssen an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and market daratumumab. 14

About multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable blood cancer that starts in the bone marrow and is characterized by an excessive proliferation of plasma cells. 15 In 2016, more than 45,000 new cases were diagnosed in Europe and more than 29,000 patients died 16 . Up to half of the patients with a recent diagnosis do not reach the five-year survival rate 17 and almost 29% of the patients with MM will die within one year of diagnosis. 18

Although treatment may result in remission, unfortunately, most patients will most likely relapse as there is currently no cure. 19 Refractory multiple myeloma occurs when the disease progresses within 60 days of the last therapy. 20,21 Recurrent cancer occurs when the disease returns after a period of initial, partial or complete remission. 22 While some patients with MM have no symptoms at all, most patients are diagnosed due to symptoms that may include bone problems, low blood counts, elevated calcium, kidney problems, or infections. 2. 3 Patients who relapse after treatment with standard therapies, including PIs and immunomodulatory agents, have a poor prognosis and few treatment options are available. 24

Data Presented at ASH 2018 Provide Evidence of First-line Treatment Benefits with IMBRUVICA®▼ (ibrutinib)-Based Therapy Across All Patient Populations in CLL

On December 5, 2018 The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson reported new results from three key studies of IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), a difficult-to-treat form of blood cancer and the most common form of leukaemia in adults (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, DEC 5, 2018, View Source [SID1234531913]).1 Findings were presented at the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, taking place in San Diego, CA.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Results from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored Phase 3 study (E1912) led by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN) were presented during the Late-Breaker abstract oral session. The study evaluated ibrutinib plus rituximab compared to a chemotherapy regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated patients aged 70 years or younger with CLL. With nearly three years of follow-up, the data showed ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus FCR.2

Data from the Phase 3 iLLUMINATE (PCYC-1130) study were also presented in an oral session and simultaneously published in The Lancet Oncology. Findings showed the combination of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab significantly improved PFS versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in patients with newly diagnosed CLL.3 These data recently supported the submission of a Type II variation application to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), seeking approval for the expanded use of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab in previously untreated adults with CLL.

In addition, ibrutinib data from the Phase 1b/2 study and its extension study (PCYC-1102, PCYC-1103) with up to seven years of follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, demonstrated durable, long-term survival benefits as a monotherapy, representing the longest follow-up for a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor in CLL.4

"Findings from both iLLUMINATE and the ECOG-ACRIN study demonstrate impressive prolonged progression-free survival for the relevant ibrutinib-based combinations, versus commonly used chemo-immunotherapy regimens," said Dr Carol Moreno, Consultant Haematologist, Hospital de la Santa Creu Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. "These non-chemotherapy regimens present an advance in how we might consider the management of patients, including younger patients and those with high risk CLL features with potential to address the trade-off between efficacy and toxicity for patients."

"The data presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) provide further convincing evidence of the clinical benefit ibrutinib can offer to patients across the spectrum of CLL management. The long-term data also offer confidence of its sustained activity for patients," said Dr Catherine Taylor, Haematology Therapy Area Lead, Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Janssen-Cilag Limited. "We continue to explore the full potential of ibrutinib through a comprehensive clinical development programme, to improve outcomes and change what a blood cancer diagnosis means to patients."

Ibrutinib, a first-in-class BTK inhibitor, is jointly developed and commercialised by Janssen Biotech, Inc., and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.

Results From the Randomised Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib (PCI-32765)-Based Therapy vs. FCR Chemoimmunotherapy in Untreated Younger Patients with CLL: A Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1912) (Abstract #LBA-4)

With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the interim analysis observed 77 PFS events and 14 deaths. Ibrutinib plus rituximab significantly improved PFS compared to FCR (HR: 0.352; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 0.223-0.558; p<0.0001); the pre-specified boundary for PFS was crossed. The ibrutinib plus rituximab treatment arm also showed improved OS (HR: 0.168; 95 percent CI: 0.053-0.538; p=0.0003, pre-specified boundary for superiority p=0.0005).2

In a subgroup analysis for PFS, ibrutinib plus rituximab showed prolonged PFS independent of age, sex, performance status, disease stage, or the presence/absence of the cytogenetic abnormality, deletion 11q23. With current follow-up, ibrutinib plus rituximab was also superior to FCR for IGHV unmutated patients (HR: 0.262; 95 percent CI: 0.137-0.498; p<0.0001) but not IGHV mutated patients (HR: 0.435; 95 percent CI: 0.140-0.1350; p=0.07).2

Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed in 58 percent of ibrutinib plus rituximab treated patients and 72 percent of FCR treated patients (p=0.0042). FCR was more frequently associated with Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (FCR: 44 percent vs. ibrutinib plus rituximab: 23 percent; p<0.0001) and infectious complications (FCR: 17.7 percent vs. ibrutinib plus rituximab: 7.1 percent; p<0.0001).2

Results from the Phase 3 iLLUMINATE study (Abstract #691)

At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab significantly prolonged the Independent Review Committee (IRC)-assessed PFS compared with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (median not reached [NR] vs. 19.0 months; HR 0.231; 95 percent CI: 0.145-0.367; p<0.0001), with a 77 percent reduction in risk of progression or death.3

Superior PFS in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm was also seen in the high-risk population, including those with unmutated IGHV, del11q, del17p and/or TP53 mutation, with an 85 percent reduction in risk of progression or death (median NR vs. 14.7 months; HR 0.154; 95 percent CI: 0.087-0.270; p<0.0001).5 In addition, IRC-assessed overall response rate (ORR) was higher in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm versus the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (88 percent vs. 73 percent); complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete blood recovery (CRi) rates were also higher with 19 percent versus eight percent, respectively. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was undetectable in blood and/or bone marrow (<10-4 by flow cytometry) for 35 percent of patients treated with ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab, compared to 25 percent of patients treated with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. OS rates at 30 months were 86 percent for the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to 85 percent for the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm.3

The most common Grade 3 or higher AEs in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm were neutropenia (36 percent vs. 46 percent), thrombocytopenia (19 percent vs. 10 percent), pneumonia (7 percent vs. 4 percent), atrial fibrillation (5 percent vs. 0 percent), febrile neutropenia (4 percent vs. 6 percent), anaemia (4 percent vs. 8 percent) and infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 2 percent vs. 8 percent).5 No patients discontinued obinutuzumab due to IRRs in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm compared to the chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (6 percent). AEs led to the discontinuation of ibrutinib in 16 percent of patients and led to the discontinuation of chlorambucil in nine percent of patients. AEs led to the discontinuation of obinutuzumab in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm (9 percent) and chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (13 percent). With about three years of follow-up, 70 percent of patients in the ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab arm remain on ibrutinib monotherapy.3

Results from up to seven years of follow-up in the Phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 study and its extension, PCYC-1103 (Abstract #3133)

Results from these studies showed durable efficacy of ibrutinib in newly diagnosed and R/R CLL patients. These long-term data showed sustained PFS and OS rates. The estimated seven-year PFS rates were 80 percent for patients with newly diagnosed disease and 32 percent for patients with R/R disease. Notably, administering ibrutinib in earlier lines of therapy resulted in improved PFS outcomes for R/R patients.4

ORR was 89 percent for all patients (CR, 15 percent), with similar rates in newly diagnosed (87 percent [CR, 32 percent]) and R/R CLL patients (89 percent [CR, 10 percent]). Median duration of response (DOR) was NR (95 percent CI: 0+-85+) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and was 57 months (95 percent CI: 0+-85+) for R/R CLL patients.6 Median PFS was NR (95 percent CI: not estimable [NE], NE) for newly diagnosed CLL patients and was 51 months (95 percent CI: 37-70) for R/R CLL patients.4,6 The median OS was NR in newly diagnosed (95 percent CI: 80-NE) or R/R CLL patients (95 percent CI: 63-NE), with estimated seven-year OS rates of 75 percent and 52 percent, respectively.4

Grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 74 percent of newly diagnosed and 89 percent of R/R patients with CLL. Hypertension (newly diagnosed, 32 percent; R/R, 26 percent), diarrhoea (newly diagnosed, 16 percent; R/R, 4 percent), and hyponatraemia (newly diagnosed, 10 percent; R/R, 0 percent) were among the most common Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs. Major haemorrhage and Grade 3 or higher atrial fibrillation, thrombocytopenia, anaemia, and arthralgia were observed in 11 percent or less of newly diagnosed and R/R patients. In addition, infection (newly diagnosed, 23 percent; R/R, 55 percent) was more common in R/R CLL patients.6 No new or unexpected AEs were observed, and the occurrence of most Grade 3 or higher AEs and serious AEs decreased over time, with the exception of hypertension.6

#ENDS#

About the ECOG-ACRIN E1912 study

The Phase 3 study (E1912) evaluated previously untreated patients with CLL aged 70 years or younger, who were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib (420 mg/day until disease progression) and rituximab (50 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 2; 325 mg/m2 on day 2 of cycle 2; 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 3-7) (n=354) or six courses of intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2) days 1-3 with rituximab (50 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1; 325 mg/m2 on day 2 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 2-6) every 28-days (n=175). The primary endpoint was PFS with a secondary endpoint of OS.2

The federally funded study was designed by researchers with ECOG-ACRIN. It was conducted through the NCI’s National Clinical Trials Network. Pharmacyclics LLC provided ibrutinib under a cooperative research and development agreement with NCI and a separate agreement with ECOG-ACRIN.

About the iLLUMINATE study

iLLUMINATE (PCYC-1130) evaluated newly diagnosed CLL patients who were randomised to receive ibrutinib 420 mg once-daily continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in combination with obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously over six cycles (n=113); or chlorambucil on Days 1 and 15 of each cycle plus obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously over 6 cycles (n=116). Median age of the patients was 71 years and 65 percent of the patients had high-risk genomic features. The primary endpoint was PFS, as assessed by an Independent Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included PFS in a high-risk population, rate of undetectable MRD, ORR, OS, and safety.3

About PCYC-1102 and PCYC-1103

With up to seven years of follow-up, the studies (Phase 1b/2, PCYC-1102 and its extension, PCYC-1103) evaluated newly diagnosed and R/R CLL patients (n=132; newly diagnosed=31, R/R=101), including those with high-risk features, who received 420 mg or 840 mg once-daily ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. As of the cutoff, 55 percent of newly diagnosed and 21 percent of R/R patients continued ibrutinib, with median follow-up of 67 months.4

About ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, which works by forming a strong covalent bond with BTK to block the transmission of cell survival signals within the malignant B-cells.7 By blocking this BTK protein, ibrutinib helps kill and reduce the number of cancer cells, thereby delaying progression of the cancer.8

Ibrutinib is currently approved in Europe for the following uses:9

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): As a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated CLL, and as a single agent or in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for the treatment of adult patients with CLL who have received at least one prior therapy.
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): Adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell MCL.
Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM): Adult patients who have received at least one prior therapy or in first-line treatment for patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy.
Ibrutinib is approved in more than 90 countries, and, to date, has been used to treat more than 135,000 patients worldwide across its approved indications.10

The most common adverse reactions seen with ibrutinib include diarrhoea, neutropenia, haemorrhage (e.g., bruising), musculoskeletal pain, nausea, rash, and pyrexia.9

For a full list of side effects and information on dosage and administration, contraindications and other precautions when using ibrutinib please refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics for further information.