On June 6, 2016 ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARIA) reported updated clinical data on brigatinib, its investigational anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, from the pivotal ALTA trial in patients who had experienced disease progression on crizotinib therapy (Press release, Ariad, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513032]). Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo! The data show that, of patients on the 180 mg regimen (Arm B) with a median follow-up of 8.3 months, 54 percent achieved a confirmed objective response, the trial’s primary endpoint. In this arm, the median progression free survival (PFS) exceeded one year (12.9 months) in this post-crizotinib setting. Additionally, a 67 percent confirmed intracranial objective response rate (ORR) was achieved in patients with measurable brain metastases. These data will be presented today, for the first time, at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper), reflecting an additional 12 weeks of patient follow up and new data on central nervous system (CNS) activity compared to the abstract released last month.
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
"Most patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer who are treated with crizotinib eventually experience disease progression, often due to acquired ALK resistance mutations or metastases in the central nervous system," said presenting author Dong-Wan Kim, M.D., Ph.D., head of the Cancer Clinical Trials Center at the Seoul National University Hospital in South Korea. "For these patients, we are very excited by the brigatinib ALTA trial data, which showed compelling efficacy and safety data, including complete responses and activity in the CNS."
The ALTA trial
The primary endpoint of the ALTA (ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of AP26113) trial is investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) as measured by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Key secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), confirmed ORR assessed by an independent review committee (IRC), CNS response (IRC-assessed intracranial ORR and PFS), overall survival, safety and tolerability. Brigatinib was granted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Orphan Drug designation for ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation for the treatment of patients with ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is resistant to crizotinib.
The trial enrolled 222 patients with ALK+ NSCLC who had been treated with and experienced disease progression on crizotinib. Patients were randomized one-to-one to receive either 90 mg of brigatinib once per day (QD) (Arm A), or 180 mg QD with a seven day lead-in at 90 mg QD (Arm B).
In addition, patients were stratified by the presence of brain metastases at baseline and best response to prior crizotinib.
Key Data from the ALTA Trial
Brigatinib Efficacy and Safety in ALK+ NSCLC Patients:
Data as of February 29, 2016
A total of 222 patients with ALK+ NSCLC treated with prior crizotinib therapy were randomized in the study (110 patients in Arm B at the 180 mg dose level with 7-day lead-in at 90 mg and 112 patients in Arm A at the 90 mg dose level). The last patient enrolled in the study in September 2015.
The median follow-up was 8.3 months in Arm B (range 0.1—20.2) and 7.8 months in Arm A (range 0.1—16.7).
Investigator-assessed confirmed ORR in Arm B was 54 percent, including four complete responses. Confirmed ORR in Arm A was 45 percent, including one complete response.
Responses in Arm B included a confirmed partial response in a patient with the ALK kinase domain G1202R mutation at baseline, which is associated with resistance to all approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
Median PFS was 12.9 months and 9.2 months in Arm B and Arm A, respectively. Probability of overall survival (OS) at 1-year was 80 percent and 71 percent in Arm B and Arm A, respectively.
An evaluation of the efficacy of brigatinib in ALK+ NSCLC patients with intracranial CNS metastases at baseline was also included in the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) presentation.
In an independent central review of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 18 patients in Arm B and 25 patients in Arm A were identified as having measurable CNS metastases at baseline.
Among patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline, the IRC-assessed confirmed intracranial ORR was 67 percent (12/18) in Arm B and 36 percent (9/25) in Arm A; among the subset of patients with measurable, active brain metastases, confirmed intracranial ORR was 73 percent (11/15) in Arm B and 36 percent (7/19) in Arm A. Measurable, active brain metastases are defined as having had no prior radiotherapy or progression following radiotherapy.
Median intracranial PFS for patients with intracranial CNS metastases at baseline was not yet reached in Arm B and was 15.6 months in Arm A.
The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; ≥ 25% of all patients, [Arm B/A]), regardless of relationship to treatment, were nausea (40%/33%), diarrhea (38%/19%), cough (34%/18%), and headache (27%/28%).
TEAEs, ≥ grade 3, occurring in ≥ 5 percent of all patients (Arm B/A), were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (9%/3%) and hypertension (6%/6%).
A subset of pulmonary adverse events with early onset (median: Day 2; range: Day 1-9) occurred in 6 percent of all patients (≥ grade 3 in 3% of patients); no such events with early onset occurred after dose escalation to 180 mg QD in Arm B.
Discontinuations and dose reductions due to AEs (Arm B/A) were 8 percent/3 percent and 20 percent/7 percent, respectively. Discontinuations due to progressive disease (Arm B/A) were 17 percent and 30 percent.
"The ALTA trial data support our planned NDA submission with a recommendation for dosing with 180 mg once daily following a seven-day lead-in at 90 mg. We are on track for submission in the third quarter," stated Timothy P. Clackson, Ph.D., president of research and development and chief scientific officer at ARIAD. "We believe brigatinib’s antitumor activity both on disease in the lungs and in the central nervous system, safety profile, and once-daily dosing regimen taken with or without food, provide the potential for brigatinib to be an important new therapeutic option for the crizotinib-resistant patient population."
Investor and Analyst Briefing and Webcast
A breakfast meeting featuring D. Ross Camidge, M.D., Ph.D., director of thoracic oncology at the Colorado University Cancer Center, to review the updated brigatinib clinical data from the ALTA trial will be webcast live along with slides and can be accessed by visiting the investor relations section of ARIAD’s website at View Source
Date: Monday, June 6, 2016
Time: 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. (CT)
Location: Hyatt McCormick Place
A replay of the investor event will be available on the ARIAD website approximately three hours after the presentation and will be archived on the site for four weeks. To ensure a timely connection to the live webcast, participants should log onto the webcast at least 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.
About Brigatinib
Brigatinib is an investigational, targeted cancer medicine discovered internally at ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It is in development for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) whose disease is resistant to crizotinib. Brigatinib is currently being evaluated in the global Phase 2 ALTA trial that is anticipated to form the basis for its initial regulatory review. ARIAD has also initiated the Phase 3 ALTA 1L trial to assess the efficacy of brigatinib in comparison to crizotinib. More information on brigatinib clinical trials, including the expanded access program (EAP) can be found here.
Brigatinib Oral Presentation
The oral presentation, "Brigatinib (BRG) in patients (pts) with crizotinib (CRZ)- refractory ALK+ non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): first report of efficacy and safety from a pivotal randomized phase (ph) 2 trial (ALTA)," (Abstract #9007) will be presented today, Monday, June 6 in the Arie Crown Theater at 11:57 a.m. CT.
Author: [email protected]
OncoSec Collaborators Present Results of Novel T-Cell Exhaustion Marker to Predict Response to Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy
On June 6, 2016 OncoSec Medical Incorporated ("OncoSec") (NASDAQ: ONCS), a company developing DNA-based intratumoral cancer immunotherapies, reported that its collaborators at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) presented results at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, demonstrating the utility of a T-cell exhaustion marker to predict response to anti-PD-1 monotherapies (Press release, OncoSec Medical, JUN 6, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513012]). Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo! Authors of this poster discussion session from UCSF include Adil Daud, MD, Alain Algazi, MD, and Michael Rosenblum, MD, PhD. This "low-tumor infiltrating lymphocyte" (TIL) marker is currently being used to select patients for the ongoing Phase II investigator-sponsored clinical trial evaluating the combination of OncoSec’s investigational therapy, ImmunoPulse IL-12, and the approved anti-PD-1 therapy, pembrolizumab, in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma.
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
Using samples from prior trials, authors presented results from a total of 53 patients evaluable for both response and the T-cell exhaustion marker (TEx). Fifteen patients were treated with a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, and 38 with monotherapy anti-PD-1. Patients determined to be "low-TIL" (TEx ≤20%) had 0/12 (0%) responses to anti-PD-1 therapy, while patients who were "high-TIL" (TEx >20%) had 21/26 (81%) responses. Median TEx was 40.3% for responders and 16% for non-responders. Using a threshold of TEx at 20%, the negative predictive value for response was 100% and the positive predictive value was 81%. For patients treated with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, the TEx threshold predictive of response was much lower. The authors concluded that this novel T-cell exhaustion marker (% TEx) is an accurate predictor of response to monotherapy, but not response to combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab.
OncoSec is currently enrolling patients into the Phase II clinical trial led by UCSF to assess the anti-tumor activity, safety, and tolerability of the combination of ImmunoPulse IL-12 and pembrolizumab. This multi-center, open-label, single-arm trial is the first study to select patients for "low-TIL" status using UCSF’s T-cell exhaustion marker assay. The study will test the hypothesis as to whether the addition of ImmunoPulse IL-12 to pembrolizumab can increase the response rate in low-TIL melanoma patients, who have a low likelihood of responding to monotherapy with anti-PD-1 blockade. The key endpoints of the study include: best overall response rate (BORR) by RECIST v1.1 and immune-related Response Criteria (irRC); safety and tolerability; duration of response; 24-week landmark progression-free survival; median progression-free survival; and overall survival.
"We are delighted that our collaborators are presenting data at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) demonstrating the utility of the flow cytometric TIL assay," said Robert H. Pierce, MD, Chief Scientific Officer at OncoSec. "Our ongoing investigator-sponsored combination trial of ImmunoPulse IL-12 and pembrolizumab hinges on the strong predictive value for poor treatment outcomes from this assay. Given these data, we are confident that we will be able to robustly identify a combination efficacy signal in our ongoing single-arm trial."
For more information about this trial, please visit: View Source
[PDF]Kyowa Hakko Kirin Announces Preliminary Results from Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Mogamulizumab (KW-0761) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Adult T-cell Leukemia-Lymphoma
On June 6, 2016 Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. (Tokyo; 4151 President and CEO: Nobuo Hanai; "Kyowa Hakko Kirin") reported the preliminary results today from the pivotal Phase 2 study of mogamulizumab (Code name: KW-0761) for the treatment of Adult T-cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL) (Press release, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, JUN 5, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513141]).
Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
"We are very pleased to announce that we have completed the largest, prospective randomized clinical trial for relapsed/refractory ATL and that the preliminary results of this pivotal Phase 2 study showed potential of mogamulizumab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ATL, where no standard of care exists" said Yoichi Sato, Managing Executive Officer, Vice President, Head of Research and Development Division of Kyowa Hakko Kirin.
Study Design
Patients from the USA, EU, and Latin America with aggressive relapsed or refractory ATL were randomized 2:1 to treatment with mogamulizumab or to 1 of 3 investigator choice (IC) regimens (Gem/Ox, DHAP or pralatrexate). Patients in the IC arm were permitted to cross-over to treatment with mogamulizumab after progression. Overall Response Rate (ORR; confirmed and unconfirmed) was assessed by the treating investigator (IA) and through blinded assessment by independent review (IR).
Study Results
71 patients were randomized (47 to mogamulizumab, 24 to IC). In the mogamulizumab treated group, unconfirmed ORR was 28% (13/47) by IR and 34% (16/47) by IA, while in the IC group, unconfirmed ORR was 8% (2/24) by IR and 0/24 by IA. Confirmed ORR (response maintained at successive evaluations approximately 8 weeks apart) for mogamulizumab was 11% by IR and 15% by IA, while there were no confirmed responses in the IC group. 18 out of 24 patients in the IC arm crossed over to mogamulizumab and 3 patients (17%) responded (1 of the responses was confirmed). The median duration of confirmed response for mogamulizumab was 5.0 months by IR and 5.5 months by IA. One patient had a response lasting more than 9 months. The frequently observed treatment-emergent, adverse events in the mogamulizumab arm included infusion reactions (46.8%), rash/drug eruption (19.1%) and infections (51.1%). The safety data collected from this study were similar to what has previously been documented.
These data from the study were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting on June 5th, 2016.
The Kyowa Hakko Kirin Group companies strive to contribute to the health and well-being of people around the world by creating new value through the pursuit of advances in life sciences and technologies.
About Mogamulizumab
Mogamulizumab is a humanized mAb directed against CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which is frequently expressed on leukemic cells of certain hematologic malignancies including ATL. Mogamulizumab was produced using Kyowa Hakko Kirin’s proprietary POTELLIGENT platform, which is associated with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and was launched in Japan in May 2012 for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CCR4-positive ATL under the trade name POTELIGEO. The drug was approved for indication expansion and was granted marketing authorization in Japan for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CCR4-positive, peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in March 2014, and with chemotherapy-naive CCR4-positive ATL in December 2014.
About Adult T-cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATL)
ATL is a disease entity within the category of mature T- and NK-cell neoplasms, according to the classification by the World Health Organization. It is an extremely aggressive T lymphocytic malignancy that originates in T-cells infected with the human T-lymphotropic virus-1(HTLV-1). ATL has a very distinct epidemiology and geographic distribution, primarily involving areas of Japan, the Caribbean Basin, parts of South America, the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa, where HTLV-1 infection is endemic. In non-endemic regions such as North America and Europe, HTLV-1 infection is mainly found in immigrants from endemic areas, their offspring or sexual contacts. Treatment regimens for ATL have not been standardized, especially in the relapsed/refractory setting, representing a large unmet medical need in this patient population.
Daratumumab (DARZALEX®) Combination Therapy Significantly Extended Progression-Free Survival in Previously Treated Patients with Multiple Myeloma
On June 5, 2016 Johnson & Johnson reported that data from the Phase 3 MMY3004 (CASTOR) clinical trial show the immunotherapy daratumumab (DARZALEX) in combination with a standard of care therapy, bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor [PI]) and dexamethasone (a corticosteroid), demonstrated a 61 percent reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (progression-free survival, or PFS) compared to bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in patients with multiple myeloma who received a median of two prior lines of therapy (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.39; 95 percent CI (0.28-0.53), p<0.0001) (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, JUN 5, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513094]).1
Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
According to results Janssen-Cilag International NV announced today, daratumumab also significantly increased the overall response rate (ORR) [83 percent vs. 63 percent, p<0.0001]. The median PFS in the daratumumab arm has not been reached, compared with a median PFS of 7.16 months for patients who received bortezomib and dexamethasone alone.1
These data will be presented in full today at 3:10 – 3:25 p.m. CDT during the "Plenary Session: Including the Science of Oncology Award and Lecture" at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago. They have also been selected for inclusion in the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Press Programme. In addition, these results will also be featured in an encore, oral presentation at the 21st Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) on Sunday 12 June at 12:00 – 12:15 p.m. CEST (Abstract #LB2236).
"We saw clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival and overall response rates with daratumumab when combined with standard of care," said Antonio Palumbo, M.D., Myeloma Unit Chief, Department of Oncology, Division of Haematology, University of Torino, Italy. "These compelling Phase 3 results demonstrate that a regimen built on daratumumab deepens clinical responses and help to underscore its potential for multiple myeloma patients who have been previously treated."
In addition to meeting the primary endpoint of improved PFS at a median follow-up of 7.4 months and significantly increasing the ORR compared to bortezomib and dexamethasone alone, daratumumab doubled rates of complete response (CR) or better [19 percent vs. 9 percent, p=0.0012], including doubling rates of very good partial response (VGPR) [59 percent vs. 29 percent, p<0.0001]. The median PFS has not been reached, compared with a median PFS of 7.16 months for patients who received bortezomib and dexamethasone alone. The treatment benefit of the daratumumab combination regimen was maintained across clinically relevant subgroups.1
"At Janssen we are committed to redefining the impact cancer has on patients, through delivering innovative research and solutions. We’re therefore extremely encouraged by the remarkable interim results of this study. The findings provide an important insight into the effect daratumumab can have in combination with established regimens, and illustrate the promise of this immunotherapy in earlier lines of treatment," said Jane Griffiths, Company Group Chairman, Janssen Europe, Middle East and Africa. "We’re dedicated to exploring the full treatment value of daratumumab for multiple myeloma patients and look forward to the difference we can make with data like these."
Overall, the safety of the daratumumab combination therapy was consistent with the known safety profile of daratumumab monotherapy (D) and bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd), respectively. The most common (>25 percent) adverse events (AEs) [DVd/Vd] were thrombocytopenia (59 percent/44 percent), peripheral sensory neuropathy (47 percent/38 percent), diarrhea (32 percent/22 percent) and anaemia (26 percent/31 percent). Most common grade 3 or 4 AEs (>10 percent) were thrombocytopenia (45 percent/33 percent), anaemia (14 percent/16 percent) and neutropenia (13 percent/4 percent). The rate of Grade 3/4 infections/infestations was 21 percent in the DVd group and 19 percent in the Vd group. The most common Grade 3/4 infections/infestations treatment-emergent AEs, or TEAEs (≥5 percent) was pneumonia (8 percent/10 percent). The number of patients with Grade 3 or 4 bleeding events (3 patients in DVd group, 2 patients in Vd group) was low in both treatment groups. Few (7 percent/9 percent) patients discontinued therapy due to a TEAE.1
About the MMY3004 (CASTOR) Trial
The Phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomised, multicentre, active-controlled MMY3004 study has included 498 patients with multiple myeloma who received a median of two prior lines of therapy. Sixty-six percent of patients received prior treatment with bortezomib; 76 percent received prior treatment with an immunomodulatory agent; and 48 percent received prior treatment with a PI and immunomodulatory agent. Thirty-three percent of patients were refractory to an immunomodulatory agent, and 32 percent were refractory to their last line of prior therapy. Patients were randomised to receive either daratumumab combined with subcutaneous bortezomib and dexamethasone (n=251) or bortezomib and dexamethasone alone (n=247). Participants were treated with daratumumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or if they had other reasons to discontinue the study.1
On March 30, 2016, the MMY3004 (CASTOR) trial was unblinded after meeting its primary endpoint of improved PFS in a pre-planned interim analysis (HR = 0.39, p<0.0001). Based on the recommendation of an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), patients in the standard of care treatment arm were offered the option to receive daratumumab following confirmed disease progression.2
Janssen will initiate discussions with regulatory authorities about the potential for a regulatory submission for this indication based on the results of this study. A comprehensive clinical study report is being prepared for submission to global health authorities.
Additional Combination Data
The Phase 3 MMY3003 (POLLUX) study, comparing daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with multiple myeloma who received at least one prior line of therapy, was also unblinded in May 2016. Based on the results at the pre-planned interim analysis conducted by an IDMC, the study met its primary endpoint of improved PFS.3 The POLLUX data have been selected for inclusion in the Presidential Symposium at EHA (Free EHA Whitepaper) on Friday 10 June 2016 at 4:47 p.m. CEST (Abstract #LB2238).
About Daratumumab
Daratumumab is a first-in-class biologic targeting CD38, a surface protein that is highly expressed across multiple myeloma cells, regardless of disease stage.4-6 Daratumumab induces rapid tumour cell death through apoptosis (programmed cell death)7,8 and multiple immune-mediated mechanisms of action, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP).7,9,10 Daratumumab has also demonstrated immunomodulatory effects that contribute to tumour cell death via a decrease in immune suppressive cells including T-regs, B-regs and myeloid-derived suppressor cells.7,11 Five Phase 3 clinical studies with daratumumab in relapsed and frontline settings are currently ongoing. Additional studies are ongoing or planned to assess its potential in other malignant and pre-malignant diseases on which CD38 is expressed. For more information, please see www.clinicaltrials.gov.
In May 2016, daratumumab was approved by the European Commission (EC) for monotherapy of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), whose prior therapy included a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent and who have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. Daratumumab was approved under an accelerated assessment, a process reserved for medicinal products expected to be of major public health interest, particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation.12
In August 2012, Janssen Biotech, Inc. and Genmab A/S entered a worldwide agreement, which granted Janssen an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialise daratumumab.
About Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is an incurable blood cancer that occurs when malignant plasma cells grow uncontrollably in the bone marrow.13,14 Refractory cancer occurs when a patient’s disease is resistant to treatment or in the case of multiple myeloma, patients progress within 60 days of their last therapy.15,16 Relapsed cancer means the disease has returned after a period of initial, partial or complete remission.17 Accounting for approximately one percent of all cancers and 15 percent to 20 percent of haematologic malignancies worldwide,18 multiple myeloma is designated as an orphan disease in both Europe and the US. Globally, it is estimated that 124,225 people were diagnosed, and 87,084 died from the disease in 2015.19,20 While some patients with multiple myeloma have no symptoms at all, most patients are diagnosed due to symptoms which can include bone fracture or pain, low red blood counts, fatigue, calcium elevation, kidney problems or infections.14 Patients who relapse after treatment with standard therapies (including PIs or immunomodulatory agents) typically have poor prognoses and few remaining options.21
82 with Everolimus in Patients with Solid Tumors at the ASCO Annual Meeting 2016
On June 5, 2016 Tyrogenex, a privately held biopharmaceutical company, reported that data from its Phase I study of X-82, an oral dual anti-VEGFR/PDGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with everolimus in solid tumors were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting 2016 held in Chicago, Illinois (Press release, Tyrogenex, JUN 5, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513093]).
Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:
Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing
Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!
The data presented were from the Phase I study in which X-82 was combined with full dose everolimus in solid tumors to determine the dose limiting toxicities and recommended Phase II dose for pNET and RCC. Results were presented by Dr. Benjamin R. Tan, MD, Washington University School of Medicine, in a poster titled "Phase I study of X-82, an oral dual anti-VEGFR/PDGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with everolimus in solid tumors."
"The results from this study provide critical information for moving forward with the development of X-82 in solid tumors," said Dr. Tan. "We have also seen favorable responses in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and prolonged stable diseases (SD) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) patients, which warrant further investigations in these tumor types. Tyrogenex continued to advances this program with the goal of providing patients suffering from a variety of solid tumors with a safe and effective treatment option."
About the Phase I Study
A 3+3 dose escalation design was utilized to determine the dose limiting toxicities and the recommended Phase II dose of daily oral X-82 plus everolimus at 10 mg PO daily for patients with solid malignancies. Key eligibility criteria included PS 0-1, measurable disease adequate organ function and normal LVEF.
Key conclusions from the study include:
Recommended Phase II dose is X-82 at 300 mg PO daily plus everolimus at 10 mg PO daily
Dose limiting toxicities include Grade 3 fatigue, mucositis and hypophosphatemia
Encouraging responses and prolonged stable disease seen in RCC and NETs
An expansion cohort for RCC and PNET are ongoing at Washington University and Vanderbilt University
About X-82
Tyrogenex’s lead compound is X-82. X-82 inhibits both VEGF and PDGFR. Tyrogenex believes X-82 targets the basic mechanisms of neovascular eye diseases, including angiogenesis, fibrosis and inflammation. X-82 is currently being evaluated for wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and solid tumors.