SignalRx Presents at AACR Annual Meeting on First-In-Class Dual PI3K/BRD4 Inhibitors for Treating Cancer

On April 19, 2016 SignalRx Pharmaceuticals Inc., focused on developing more effective oncology drugs through molecular design imparting multiple target-selected inhibition, reported the presentation of scientific data on the company’s dual small-molecule PI3K/BRD4 inhibitor program in oncology (Press release, SignalRx, APR 19, 2016, http://www.ireachcontent.com/news-releases/signalrx-presents-at-aacr-annual-meeting-on-first-in-class-dual-pi3kbrd4-inhibitors-for-treating-cancer-576189881.html [SID1234527327]). The presentation by Dr. Donald L. Durden, MD, PhD, senior scientific advisor for SignalRx, was made at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in New Orleans, LA.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The presentation highlighted advancements in the development of SF2523, SF2535 and SF2558HA, all single small molecules that inhibit both PI3 kinase (PI3K) and the new epigenetic cancer target BRD4. Key breakthroughs are:

New crystal structures obtained for SF2523, SF2535 and SF2558HA with BRD4 protein providing insights on key dual inhibitor binding interactions.
First-time proof of MYC inhibition by enhancing MYC degradation via PI3K inhibition AND blocking MYC production via MYC transcription inhibition (BRD4 inhibition).
SF2523 exhibits desired in vivo anti-tumor effects with no toxicity in several mouse cancer models.
Inhibition of PI3K-gamma and delta isoforms by SF2523 function as checkpoint inhibitors and enhance immune-therapeutics.
BRD4 inhibition blocks tumor-specific super-enhancers activating the innate and adaptive immune response providing a novel strategy to treat cancer.
The company also demonstrated that SF2523 is safer to normal cells over the combination of single PI3K and BRD4 inhibitors making SF2523 an attractive anti-cancer candidate that can potentially overcome traditional toxicity issues associated with most combinations of oncology drugs.

SignalRx is also announcing that it is seeking a partner to accelerate the development of these novel small molecules into first-in-man clinical trials based on the promising profile of its PI3K/BRD4 inhibitors shown so far. Since these are single molecules with a single PK/PD and toxicity profile, there is a great opportunity to develop them as single therapeutics and streamline their development in combination therapies focused on companion diagnostics built around synthetic lethality discoveries in human cancers, e.g., kinome adaptation mediated by BRD4.

Astex Pharmaceuticals Enters Clinical Trial Collaboration to Explore the Potential of Combining Guadecitabine (SGI-110) with Atezolizumab in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

On April 19th, 2016 Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a pharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of novel small molecule oncology therapeutics, reported that it has entered into a clinical collaboration with Genentech (Press release, Astex Pharmaceuticals, APR 19, 2016, View Source [SID:1234511097]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The collaboration will evaluate the potential for combining Astex’s next generation hypomethylating agent, guadecitabine (SGI-110), with Genentech’s investigational anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, atezolizumab, in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). An initial Phase 1b study will investigate the safety and pharmacology of the combination.

The collaboration will test the hypothesis that upfront "priming" of patients’ immune systems with guadecitabine, an epigenetic investigational drug, may result in enhanced responses to immunotherapy. The hypothesis is based on the observation that guadecitabine demethylates and induces re-expression of tumor associated antigens, as well as inducing or upregulating the expression of immune checkpoints such as programmed death 1 (PD-1), and programmed deathligand 1 (PD-L1) and 2 (PD-L2), rendering the tumor more immunogenic, and more susceptible to treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor antibody such as atezolizumab (Maio et al, Clin. Cancer Research, 2015; 21:4040-47).

Guadecitabine has been evaluated in multiple Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials to investigate its potential in the treatment of a range of cancers. Astex has recently completed a large (over 400 patients) randomized Phase 1/2 study in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or AML. The trial included a Phase I dose escalation stage (93 patients) and a randomized Phase 2 stage (308 patients) that investigated four different patient populations: treatment naïve and relapsed/refractory AML and MDS. The trial demonstrated that guadecitabine was clinically active and well tolerated in all four patient groups. The results from the Phase 1 portion of the trial were recently published in Lancet Oncology (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2815%2900038-8/abstract). Additional information about the study can be found online at View Source

Guadecitabine is now being evaluated in the ASTRAL-1 trial, a large, global, randomized 800-patient study in treatment naïve AML patients who are unfit to receive, or unsuitable for, intensive induction chemotherapy. The trial compares guadecitabine with physician’s choice of low-dose cytarabine, decitabine or azacitidine. Additional information about the study can be found online at: View Source

Mohammad Azab, Astex’s President and Chief Medical Officer said: "We are delighted that Genentech has chosen to partner with Astex on this exciting study. The idea of combining epigenetic therapies such as guadecitabine with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as atezolizumab, has the potential to open up new therapeutic options with enhanced outcomes for patients with a range of cancer types. Astex is committed to exploring the broad potential of guadecitabine as a "backbone" therapy for use in immunotherapy combinations.

About Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
AML is the most common form of leukemia in adults. Over 20,000 new cases of AML are diagnosed annually in the US. Although 60%-75% of AML patients 60 years old is significantly worse with response rates < 50%, cure rates remaining at <10% and a median survival of 1 year. These figures have not significantly improved within the last 3 decades. These patients have few therapeutic options. Effective, less toxic therapies are needed for the treatment of AML, particularly for elderly patients whose comorbidities make them unfit for intensive therapy.

About Guadecitabine (SGI-110)

Guadecitabine is a novel next-generation, small molecule DNA hypomethylating agent formulated as a single, small volume, subcutaneous injection. The product was designed to deliver longer exposure to the active metabolite, decitabine, compared to iv decitabine, and more efficient delivery into key tissues, including the bone marrow. Guadecitabine demonstrated activity in restoring silenced tumor suppressor gene expression in cancer cells by reversal of DNA methylation and inducing responses in previously treated MDS and AML patients. Guadecitabine is wholly owned by Astex Pharmaceuticals.

About Atezolizumab
Atezolizumab (also known as MPDL3280A) is an investigational humanized monoclonal antibody designed to target and bind to a protein called PD-L1, which is expressed on tumor cells and tumorinfiltrating immune cells. PD-L1 interacts with PD-1 and B7.1, both found on the surface of T cells, thereby inhibiting T cell function. By blocking this interaction, atezolizumab may enable the activation of T cells, restoring their ability to effectively detect and attack tumour cells. Atezolizumab is being developed by Genentech (South San Francisco, CA, USA), a member of the Roche Group.

Transgene Presents Pre-Clinical Data at AACR on a New Generation Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy Armed with an Anti-PD1 Monoclonal Antibody

On April 19, 2016 Transgene SA (Euronext: TNG) reported that preclinical data on an internally developed, new generation oncolytic viral immunotherapy product candidate was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper) in New Orleans, USA (Press release, Transgene, APR 19, 2016, View Source/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/20160419-AACR-Poster-PR-Final.pdf" target="_blank" title="View Source/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/20160419-AACR-Poster-PR-Final.pdf" rel="nofollow">View Source [SID:1234511091]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Transgene SA is developing a new generation of oncolytic viral immunotherapies that are armed with cancer-fighting genes, seeking to provide enhanced efficacy to cancer patients while reducing toxicity. At the AACR (Free AACR Whitepaper) meeting, Transgene reported pre-clinical results with three oncolytic vaccinia viruses, each containing a different form of a PD-1 blocker (VV-PD-1): a full monoclonal antibody (mAb), an antigen-binding fragment (Fab) or a single-chain variable fragment (scFv). Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 represent a major advance in treating several forms of cancer. The data showed that all three versions of the VV-PD-1 expression products displayed (i) a perfect biochemical integrity and folding, (ii) were fully functional, and (iii) had equivalent biological activity to the corresponding anti PD-1 reference mAb. Furthermore, the biodistribution profile obtained for VV-PD-1 demonstrated a higher concentration and prolonged action of the anti PD-1 in the tumor, resulting in an improved tumor/serum ratio. Finally, the therapeutic activity was assessed in a pre-clinical model for sarcoma, showing similar activity for VV-PD1 to the combination of VV and anti-PD1 mAb, both in terms of tumor growth prevention and survival, but was considerably higher than any of the single products.

These results support advancing the development of these next generation oncolytic vaccinia viruses armed with antibodies, and more generally, with other types of immune-active functions.

"The data presented at the AACR (Free AACR Whitepaper) Annual Meeting are an example of the novel research ongoing at Transgene and highlight our strong expertise in viral vectorization," said Eric Quéméneur, PhD, Executive Vice President and Vice President, Research & Development of Transgene. "Our goal is to develop a new generation of oncolytic viral immunotherapies that can deliver multiple cancer-fighting proteins, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, directly to the tumor microenvironment. These multi-functional oncolytics, being developed at Transgene, should lead to more efficacious and better tolerated treatment options while containing cancer treatment costs for both patients and national health authorities".

A copy of the poster, Vectorization in an oncolytic vaccinia virus of an antibody, a Fab and a scFv against programmed cell death -1 (PD-1) allow their intratumoral delivery and an improved tumor-growth inhibition, can be found on Transgene’s website in the "Our Pipeline/Publications" section at View Source

Merck Statement on Blueprint Project Findings Presented at the American Association for Cancer Research 2016 Annual Meeting

On April 19, 2016 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, is proud to be a part of the Blueprint PD-L1 Assay Comparison Project, an important initiative to compare several new diagnostic tests for the immune biomarker PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Press release, Merck & Co, APR 19, 2016, View Source [SID:1234511085]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Merck believes strongly in the importance of PD-L1 testing in NSCLC, and is committed to supporting the Blueprint Project and overall efforts to use diagnostics to help physicians identify the best treatment approach for their patients with some cancers.

In oncology, testing is now common for numerous cancer biomarkers to enable physicians to better tailor treatment decisions for each patient. The data from a range of studies, including Merck’s studies of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), demonstrate that PD-L1 testing can be a useful tool to help identify patients more likely to respond to treatment with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in certain cancers, including NSCLC.

Phase 1 of the Blueprint Project is an important step toward understanding the usefulness of the different PD-L1 testing approaches. Analyses from the Blueprint Project confirm that there is high concordance for the two approved PD-L1 diagnostics in NSCLC, including the one used in conjunction with KEYTRUDA, the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay developed in partnership with Dako North America, Inc., an Agilent Technologies Company.

"We are very encouraged by the findings from the Blueprint Project, and are eager to support the greater use of biomarker testing to advance the care of patients with cancer," said Dr. Roy Baynes, senior vice president and head of global clinical development, Merck Research Laboratories. "This analysis reinforces our precision medicine approach in NSCLC to help provide physicians and patients with greater insight into each patient’s disease and therefore greater confidence in their treatment decisions."

Merck is a leader in advancing immuno-oncology through the development of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) alongside its Dako companion diagnostic. We are continuing to build our knowledge of genetics and biomarkers in order to ensure we can match KEYTRUDA with patients who are more likely to experience benefit.

About the Blueprint Project

Results from the Blueprint Project, a first-of-its kind collaboration, were presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper) 2016 Annual Meeting.

In March 2015, the AACR (Free AACR Whitepaper) in partnership with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) held a one-day workshop to examine whether multiple companion diagnostics intended for the same class of therapeutics could be harmonized. During the workshop, a group of four pharmaceutical companies and two diagnostic companies released a blueprint proposal to analytically compare and characterize each of their IHC-based PD-1/PD-L1 companion diagnostics for non-small cell lung cancer in the pre-approval stage. The thought was that, upon approval of these tests, the information generated by this project could lay the groundwork for additional studies that will help inform patients, physicians, pathologists, and others on how best to use the test results to determine treatment decisions.

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

KEYTRUDA is indicated in the United States for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA-approved test with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA. The NSCLC indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not yet been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every three weeks for the approved indications.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab)

Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 19 (3.5%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (1.1%), 3 (1.3%), 4 (0.4%), or 5 (0.2%) pneumonitis and occurred more frequently in patients with a history of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.4%) or prior thoracic radiation (6.0%). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent Grade 2 pneumonitis.

Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 4 (0.7%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%) or 3 (0.4%) colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hypophysitis occurred in 1 (0.2%) of 550 patients, which was Grade 3 in severity. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis (including hypopituitarism and adrenal insufficiency). Administer corticosteroids and hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; withhold or discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 hypophysitis.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 10 (1.8%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (0.7%) or 3 (0.3%) hyperthyroidism. Hypothyroidism occurred in 38 (6.9%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (5.5%) or 3 (0.2%) hypothyroidism. Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. Administer replacement hormones for hypothyroidism and manage hyperthyroidism with thionamides and beta-blockers as appropriate. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 hyperthyroidism.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus, including diabetic ketoacidosis, occurred in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes, and withhold KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) and administer anti-hyperglycemics in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Immune-mediated nephritis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Other clinically important immune-mediated adverse reactions can occur. For suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, ensure adequate evaluation to confirm etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold KEYTRUDA and administer corticosteroids. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Based on limited data from clinical studies in patients whose immune-related adverse reactions could not be controlled with corticosteroid use, administration of other systemic immunosuppressants can be considered. Resume KEYTRUDA when the adverse reaction remains at Grade 1 or less following corticosteroid taper. Permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for any Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse reaction that recurs and for any life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reaction.

The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% of 550 patients: rash, vasculitis, hemolytic anemia, serum sickness, and myasthenia gravis.

Severe and life-threatening infusion-related reactions have been reported in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions including rigors, chills, wheezing, pruritus, flushing, rash, hypotension, hypoxemia, and fever. For Grade 3 or 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. If used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant during treatment, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of KEYTRUDA.

KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 14% of 550 patients. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients were pleural effusion, pneumonia, dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonitis. The most common adverse reactions (reported in at least 20% of patients) were fatigue (44%), cough (29%), decreased appetite (25%), and dyspnea (23%).

No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies have been conducted with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab).

It is not known whether KEYTRUDA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, instruct women to discontinue nursing during treatment with KEYTRUDA and for 4 months after the final dose.

Safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA have not been established in pediatric patients.

Our Focus on Cancer

Our goal is to translate breakthrough science into innovative oncology medicines to help people with cancer worldwide. At Merck Oncology, helping people fight cancer is our passion and supporting accessibility to our cancer medicines is our commitment. Our focus is on pursuing research in immuno-oncology and we are accelerating every step in the journey – from lab to clinic – to potentially bring new hope to people with cancer. For more information about our oncology clinical trials, visit www.merck.com/clinicaltrials.

Pfizer Announces Positive Top-Line Results for Phase 3 PALOMA-2 Clinical Trial of IBRANCE® (palbociclib)

On April 19, 2016 Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) reported positive top-line results from the Phase 3 PALOMA-2 trial for IBRANCE (palbociclib), an oral, first-in-class inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6 (Press release, Pfizer, APR 19, 2016, View Source [SID:1234511074]).1

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The study met its primary endpoint by demonstrating an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for the combination of IBRANCE plus letrozole compared with letrozole plus placebo in post-menopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+, HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had not received previous systemic treatment for their advanced disease. The PALOMA-2 trial provides confirmatory evidence for IBRANCE in combination with letrozole in the first-line setting, which was first studied in the Phase 2 PALOMA-1 trial. These data will support additional planned global regulatory submissions and a request for conversion of the accelerated approval for IBRANCE to regular approval in the U.S. Detailed efficacy and safety results from PALOMA-2 will be submitted for presentation at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 Annual Meeting.

"PALOMA-2 represents the third randomized study to demonstrate the benefit of IBRANCE when added to hormonal therapy in the management of women with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. IBRANCE remains the only CDK 4/6 inhibitor with Phase 3 data in this disease," said Dr. Mace Rothenberg, MD, chief medical officer, Pfizer Oncology & senior vice president, Global Product Development, Oncology. "These results provide confirmatory evidence for PALOMA-1 and will be used to support regulatory submissions around the world, including a request for conversion of IBRANCE from accelerated to full approval in the United States. We look forward to sharing the detailed results of PALOMA-2 with the oncology community and advancing our discussions with regulatory authorities."
The adverse events observed with IBRANCE in combination with letrozole in PALOMA-2 were generally consistent with the known safety profile for IBRANCE across the different patient populations and lines of therapy in the clinical development program to date. The warnings and precautions of IBRANCE include neutropenia, pulmonary embolism and embryo-fetal toxicity.1 For more information, please see Important Safety Information for IBRANCE below.1

Since its introduction in February 2015, more than 25,000 women have been prescribed IBRANCE by more than 6,000 prescribers in the U.S.

Based on the results of PALOMA-1, IBRANCE first was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2015 for the treatment of postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer in combination with letrozole as initial endocrine-based therapy for their metastatic disease.1 The indication in combination with letrozole was approved under accelerated approval based on PFS. As stated at the time of the approval, continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in PALOMA-2, which the FDA identified as the confirmatory trial.1 Pfizer will work with the FDA to submit the results of PALOMA-2 to support conversion of the accelerated approval for IBRANCE to regular approval in the U.S.

As previously announced in February 2016, IBRANCE also is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant in women with disease progression following endocrine therapy based on results from the Phase 3 PALOMA-3 study.1

IBRANCE also is approved in eight countries outside of the U.S., and Pfizer will work with additional global regulatory authorities to review the PALOMA-2 data. As previously disclosed in August 2015, Pfizer has filed a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for IBRANCE in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The MAA was based on the results from the PALOMA-1 and PALOMA-3 trials. Pfizer will work with the EMA to submit the PALOMA-2 results as additional supporting data for the ongoing review of the MAA.

About the PALOMA Trials

Pfizer has worked closely with investigators and international breast cancer experts to establish a robust development program for IBRANCE in HR+, HER2- breast cancer across stages and treatment settings.

PALOMA-1

PALOMA-1 is a randomized (1:1), multi-center, multinational, open label Phase 2 trial designed to assess PFS in postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving IBRANCE (125 mg once daily for three out of four weeks in repeated cycles) in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone (2.5 mg once daily on a continuous regimen) as a first-line treatment. The results from PALOMA-1 were published online by The Lancet Oncology in December 2014.
PALOMA-2

PALOMA-2 is a randomized (2:1), multicenter, multinational, double-blind Phase 3 study designed to assess PFS in postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving IBRANCE (125 mg orally once daily for three out of four weeks in repeated cycles) in combination with letrozole (2.5 mg once daily continuously) versus letrozole plus placebo as a first-line treatment. PALOMA-2 has more than 200 global sites participating and 666 patients enrolled.
PALOMA-3

PALOMA-3 is a randomized (2:1), multicenter, multinational, double-blind Phase 3 study designed to assess PFS with IBRANCE (125 mg once daily orally for three out of four weeks in each cycle) in combination with fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscularly on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and then on day 1 of each subsequent 28 day cycle) versus fulvestrant plus placebo in pre/perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer whose disease has progressed during or after endocrine therapy. Based on the PALOMA-3 results, a supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) was reviewed and approved in February 2016 under the FDA’s Breakthrough Therapy designation and Priority Review programs to expand the use of IBRANCE to include use in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy.1
The full prescribing information for IBRANCE can be found at www.pfizer.com.

Important Safety Information

Neutropenia was the most frequently reported adverse reaction in Study 1 (PALOMA-1) (75%) and Study 2 (PALOMA-3) (83%). In Study 1, Grade 3 (57%) or 4 (5%) decreased neutrophil counts were reported in patients receiving IBRANCE plus letrozole. In Study 2, Grade 3 (56%) or Grade 4 (11%) decreased neutrophil counts were reported in patients receiving IBRANCE plus fulvestrant. Febrile neutropenia has been reported in about 1% of patients exposed to IBRANCE. One death due to neutropenic sepsis was observed in Study 2. Inform patients to promptly report any fever.

Monitor complete blood count prior to starting IBRANCE, at the beginning of each cycle, on Day 14 of first 2 cycles, and as clinically indicated. Dose interruption, dose reduction, or delay in starting treatment cycles is recommended for patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been reported at a higher rate in patients treated with IBRANCE plus letrozole in Study 1 (5%) and in patients treated with IBRANCE plus fulvestrant in Study 2 (1%) compared with no cases in patients treated either with letrozole alone or fulvestrant plus placebo. Monitor for signs and symptoms of PE and treat as medically appropriate.

Based on the mechanism of action, IBRANCE can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during IBRANCE treatment and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose. IBRANCE may impair fertility in males and has the potential to cause genotoxicity. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during IBRANCE treatment and for 3 months after the last dose. Advise females to inform their healthcare provider of a known or suspected pregnancy. Advise women not to breastfeed during IBRANCE treatment and for 3 weeks after the last dose because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants.

The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in Study 1 of IBRANCE plus letrozole vs letrozole alone included neutropenia (75% vs 5%), leukopenia (43% vs 3%), fatigue (41% vs 23%), anemia (35% vs 7%), upper respiratory infection (31% vs 18%), nausea (25% vs 13%), stomatitis (25% vs 7%), alopecia (22% vs 3%), diarrhea (21% vs 10%), thrombocytopenia (17% vs 1%), decreased appetite (16% vs 7%), vomiting (15% vs 4%), asthenia (13% vs 4%), peripheral neuropathy (13% vs 5%), and epistaxis (11% vs 1%).

Grade 3/4 adverse reactions (≥10%) in Study 1 reported at a higher incidence in the IBRANCE plus letrozole group vs the letrozole alone group included neutropenia (54% vs 1%) and leukopenia (19% vs 0%). The most frequently reported serious adverse events in patients receiving IBRANCE plus letrozole were pulmonary embolism (4%) and diarrhea (2%).

Lab abnormalities occurring in Study 1 (all grades, IBRANCE plus letrozole vs letrozole alone) were decreased WBC (95% vs 26%), decreased neutrophils (94% vs 17%), decreased lymphocytes (81% vs 35%), decreased hemoglobin (83% vs 40%), and decreased platelets (61% vs 16%).

The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in Study 2 of IBRANCE plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant plus placebo included neutropenia (83% vs 4%), leukopenia (53% vs 5%), infections (47% vs 31%), fatigue (41% vs 29%), nausea (34% vs 28%), anemia (30% vs 13%), stomatitis (28% vs 13%), headache (26% vs 20%), diarrhea (24% vs 19%), thrombocytopenia (23% vs 0%), constipation (20% vs 16%), vomiting (19% vs 15%), alopecia (18% vs 6%), rash (17% vs 6%), decreased appetite (16% vs 8%), and pyrexia (13% vs 5%).

Grade 3/4 adverse reactions (≥10%) in Study 2 reported at a higher incidence in the IBRANCE plus fulvestrant group vs the fulvestrant plus placebo group included neutropenia (66% vs 1%) and leukopenia (31% vs 2%). The most frequently reported serious adverse reactions in patients receiving IBRANCE plus fulvestrant were infections (3%), pyrexia (1%), neutropenia (1%), and pulmonary embolism (1%).

Lab abnormalities occurring in Study 2 (all grades, IBRANCE plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant plus placebo) were decreased WBC (99% vs 26%), decreased neutrophils (96% vs 14%), anemia (78% vs 40%), and decreased platelets (62% vs 10%).

Avoid concurrent use of strong CYP3A inhibitors. If patients must be administered a strong CYP3A inhibitor, reduce the IBRANCE dose to 75 mg/day. If the strong inhibitor is discontinued, increase the IBRANCE dose (after 3-5 half-lives of the inhibitor) to the dose used prior to the initiation of the strong CYP3A inhibitor. Grapefruit or grapefruit juice may increase plasma concentrations of IBRANCE and should be avoided. Avoid concomitant use of strong CYP3A inducers. The dose of sensitive CYP3A substrates with a narrow therapeutic index may need to be reduced as IBRANCE may increase their exposure.

IBRANCE has not been studied in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment or in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min).

About IBRANCE (palbociclib) 125mg capsules

IBRANCE is an oral inhibitor of CDKs 4 and 6,1 which are key regulators of the cell cycle that trigger cellular progression.3,4 IBRANCE is indicated for the treatment of HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with letrozole as initial endocrine based therapy in postmenopausal women, or fulvestrant in women with disease progression following endocrine therapy.1 The indication in combination with letrozole is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival (PFS). Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial.1