Halozyme Presents Stage One Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Phase 2 Clinical Study In Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated With PEGPH20

On June 4, 2016 Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: HALO), a biotechnology company developing novel oncology and drug-delivery therapies, repprted results from a final analysis of 135 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were treated in Stage One of HALO 109-202, a phase 2 clinical study of its investigational new drug PEGPH20 in combination with ABRAXANE (nab-paclitaxel) and gemcitabine (PAG arm) as compared to ABRAXANE and gemcitabine alone (AG arm) (Press release, Halozyme, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513006]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

This final analysis of secondary and exploratory endpoints was conducted using the Ventana companion diagnostic to retrospectively identify high levels of hyaluronan (HA). The key results based on a February 2016 data cut-off showed in the HA-high patient population:

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 months in the PAG arm versus 6.0 months in the AG arm, hazard ratio (HR) with a 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.46 (0.15, 1.40);
Overall response rate (ORR) of 50 percent, including one complete response in the PAG arm versus 33 percent and all partial responses in the AG arm;
Median duration of response (DoR) of 8.1 months in the PAG arm versus 3.7 months in the AG arm;
The exploratory analysis of median overall survival (OS) was similar between the treatment arms — 11.8 months vs. 10.9 months in the PAG vs. AG arms respectively. Factors potentially having an impact on these results include less aggressive disease among patients in the AG arm and a greater than 40 percent discontinuation rate of PEGPH20 treatment at the time of the clinical hold, resulting in all patients receiving AG alone in both arms;
The rate of thromboembolic (TE) events reduced from 43 percent to 9 percent in the PAG arm and from 25 percent to 6 percent in the AG arm with the introduction of prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) from Stage One to Stage Two of the study.
"We are encouraged by the positive trends in this final Stage One dataset, even with PEGPH20 treatment being discontinued for more than 40 percent of patients in the PAG arm due to the prior clinical hold," said Dr. Athena Countouriotis, senior vice president and chief medical officer. "The safety profile continues to show the benefit of prophylactic enoxaparin use and the dataset continues to support our ongoing phase 3 study."

Prior interim analyses were based on patient follow up through December 2014. Results announced today include 14 months of additional follow up through February 2016. Stage One of HALO 202 enrolled a total of 146 patients between May 2013 to July 2014. The study was placed on clinical hold from April to July 2014 during which time PEGPH20 was discontinued while patients in both arms continued to receive treatment with ABRAXANE and gemcitabine alone. Stage Two enrolled a total of 133 patients as of February 2016 and Halozyme remains blinded to the overall efficacy. The company projects to report mature PFS and ORR results from Stage Two late in the fourth quarter.

Dr. Andrea Bullock, attending physician in Gastrointestinal Oncology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and an Instructor in Medicine at Harvard University said: "As one of the highest enrollers in the HALO 202 study, I am encouraged by the final data from Stage One in the HA-high patients. While the sample size remains small, the median PFS and ORR continue to favor the PEGPH20 combination treatment arm compared to the standard of care AG arm. I look forward to the Stage Two results later this year and to participating in the phase 3 global study very soon."

Halozyme’s ongoing phase 3 study, HALO 301, uses the Ventana companion diagnostic to prospectively identify HA-high patients and mirrors the design of the phase 2 study including the current inclusion/exclusion criteria; 2:1 randomization; and dosing regimens. This double-blinded placebo-controlled study plans to enroll a total of 420 patients at approximately 200 centers within 20 countries. The co-primary endpoints are PFS and OS, with a target hazard ratio of 0.59 for PFS, which is well supported by the final results from Stage One of HALO 202.

Halozyme is the only oncology biotech targeting HA, a glycosaminoglycan – or chain of natural sugars throughout the body – that can accumulate around cancer cells inhibiting other therapies. PEGPH20 is designed to degrade HA to improve the access to tumor cells for chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and other immuno-therapy agents.

About HALO 301
HALO 301 is a phase 3 global, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial evaluating investigational new drug PEGPH20 as a first-line therapy for potential treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The trial will be conducted at approximately 200 sites with two co-primary endpoints of progression free survival and overall survival in patients receiving investigational new drug PEGPH20 in combination with gemcitabine and ABRAXANE (nab-paclitaxel) compared to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone. Secondary endpoints also include objective response rate and overall survival. More information may be found at clinicaltrials.gov (search HALO 301 or trial identifier NCT02715804) or www.HALO301.com.

About PEGPH20
PEGPH20 is an investigational PEGylated form of Halozyme’s proprietary recombinant human hyaluronidase under clinical development for the potential systemic treatment of tumors that accumulate hyaluronan.

FDA granted orphan drug designation to PEGPH20 for treatment of pancreatic cancer and fast track for PEGPH20 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Additionally, the European Commission, acting on the recommendation from the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products of the European Medicines Agency, designated investigational drug PEGPH20 an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Five Prime Therapeutics Announces Updated Data in Mesothelioma Patients from Ongoing Phase 1b Trial of FP-1039 Presented at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 04, 2016 Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:FPRX), a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on discovering and developing innovative immuno-oncology protein therapeutics, reported that updated data from the ongoing Phase 1b trial of FP-1039/GSK3052230 (hereafter FP-1039) in mesothelioma patients were reported today in a poster presentation at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago (Press release, Five Prime Therapeutics, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512998]). Dr. Jose Trigo from the Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain, presented the poster, titled Multi-arm, open-label Phase 1b study of FP-1039/GSK3052230 with chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The poster is available on the Five Prime website: View Source

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The mesothelioma arm of the open-label Phase 1b trial evaluated weekly infusions of FP-1039, an FGF ligand trap, in combination with 1st-line pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with untreated, unresectable MPM. Following the dose escalation portion of the trial, 15 mg/kg of FP-1039 was identified as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and established as the dose for expansion in patients with MPM. The primary study endpoints are safety and response rates, with Progression Free Survival (PFS), duration of response and translational measures as secondary endpoints. The poster includes data from 34 MPM patients who had received doses of FP-1039 as of the April 18, 2016 data cut-off and 18 patients were continuing on the trial at that time point.

Safety Data

The most common adverse events (AEs; all grades) observed were: nausea (53%), decreased appetite (41%) and fatigue (35%)
The vast majority of events were Grades 1-2
Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported at the 20 mg/kg dose (Grade 5 bowel perforation/ischemia, Grade 3 elevated creatinine level and Grade 3 infusion reaction) whereas no DLTs were reported at 15 mg/kg, and thus maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at 15 mg/kg
Toxicities associated with small-molecule FGFR inhibitors, such as hyperphosphatemia, retinal detachment and nailbed changes, have not been observed.
Efficacy Data
In the 18 patients evaluable as of April 18, 2016 who had received FP-1039 doses at or below the 15 mg/kg MTD:

Preliminary Objective Response Rate (ORR) was 39%, with a Disease Control Rate (DCR) of 100%, evaluated per mRECIST 1.1
7 confirmed Partial Responses (PRs) and 11 Stable Disease (SD)
Evaluable patients are defined as patients who enrolled at least 42 days (2 cycles) prior to the cutoff date, which was also the minimum time duration utilized in the calculation of DCR
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 6.8 months, though the data are still maturing.
More than 50% (19 out of 34 dosed) of mesothelioma patients are still on trial
"The data continue to evolve and we are hopeful that FP-1039 will be shown to have potential benefit for patients with mesothelioma. Several mesothelioma patients were still on study at the time of the data cut off, so we will continue to follow their progress," said Lewis T. "Rusty" Williams, M.D., Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of Five Prime. "We are currently working with GSK to complete the trial and will be monitoring the quality and durability of patient responses and evaluating drug supply, manufacturing and other considerations as we determine the future plans for FP-1039."

About FP-1039
FP-1039 is a protein drug designed to intervene in FGF signaling. As a ligand trap, FP-1039 binds to FGF ligands circulating in the extracellular space (such as FGF2), preventing these signaling proteins from reaching FGFR1 on the surface of tumor cells. Treatment with FP-1039 treatment has not been shown to cause hyperphosphatemia, a side effect seen with small molecule inhibitors of FGF receptors, which block the activity of both cancer-associated FGFs and FGF-23. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is completing the ongoing Phase 1b trial in malignant pleural mesothelioma and will transfer its development and commercialization rights for FP-1039 back to Five Prime upon completion.

Roche showcases three distinct combinations for cancer immunotherapy treatment across a broad range of cancers

On June 4, 2016 Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) reported that it is presenting data from across its cancer immunotherapy pipeline highlighting its multipronged combination approach to cancer immunotherapy treatment (Press release, Hoffmann-La Roche , JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512997]). The first combination trial evaluated Tecentriq with targeted therapy Cotellic in a phase Ib study in people with mCRC who had been heavily pretreated. The study demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with an Overall Response Rate (ORR) of 17 percent (n=4). All responders had the KRAS gene mutation, and responses were observed irrespective of Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status. Responses were ongoing in two out of four people at the time of data analysis. The second evaluated a combination with Tecentriq and Abraxane chemotherapy in a phase Ib study for people with mTNBC. The results showed that the safety profile was similar to that previously seen with Tecentriq or Abraxane chemotherapy alone. An ORR of 38% (n=32) was observed across all lines of therapy. The final combination being presented are dose-escalation results from the ongoing phase Ib study of the investigational Roche cancer immunotherapy molecule (MOXR0916, anti-OX40) and Tecentriq. The data showed a favourable safety profile and evidence of immune activation, supporting the continuation of further investigation into the potential benefits this combination could bring to patients.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Combinations based on a deep understanding of the science are a central component of our cancer immunotherapy development strategy.’’ said Sandra Horning, MD, Roche’s Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. "We believe we may be able to bring the full potential of treatments such as Tecentriq to a greater number of people by exploiting different mechanisms of action in combination, such as with chemotherapy, targeted treatments and other immunotherapy agents.’’

Further information on Roche’s contribution to the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 scientific programme, the company’s wider progress in cancer care and key data being presented at the conference will be featured at a Roche investor briefing on Sunday 5 June between 6pm – 8pm CDT. This event is independently organised by Roche and is open to analysts attending the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 Annual Meeting. To register for the Roche investor briefing, please use the following link:
View Source

To learn more about Roche’s personalised cancer immunotherapy programme and Roche’s contribution to ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016, please follow Roche on Twitter via @Roche. You can keep up to date with ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 Annual Meeting news and updates by using the hashtag #ASCO16.

About the phase Ib combination study of Tecentriq with Cotellic in advanced CRC
Overview and study design
A phase Ib, open-label, multicentre study designed to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of co-administration of intravenous dosing of Tecentriq and oral dosing of Cotellic in participants with metastatic or locally advanced cancer for which standard therapies have been exhausted

The primary endpoints of the study were safety and tolerability with secondary endpoints including ORR confirmed by RECIST v1.1

23 CRC (22 KRAS mutant, one wild type) patients were enrolled during escalation and expansion

Cobimetinib was escalated from 20 mg to 60 mg daily (21 days on/7 days off) and combined with Tecentriq 800 mg IV q2w

About the phase Ib combination study of Tecentriq with Abraxne in mTNBC
Overview and study design

GP28328 (NCT01633970) was a multi-centre, multi-arm study evaluating Tecentriq in combination with Abraxane chemotherapy. Arm F consisted of patients with TNBC (up to 3 prior lines of chemotherapy were allowed)

— The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability

— Secondary endpoints included efficacy per RECIST v1.1 criteria (best overall response, objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival) and immune-related response criteria (irRC), pharmacokinetics and biomarker analyses

About the phase Ib study of MOXR0916 (OX40) and Tecentriq in advanced solid tumours
Overview and study design

A phase Ib, open-label, multicentre study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of MOXR0916 and Tecentriq in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours

The primary endpoint of the study is safety and tolerability,

A 3+3 dose-escalation was conducted with a 21-day window to evaluate dose-limiting toxicity

— Escalating doses of MOXR0916 in combination with a fixed 1200 mg dose of Tecentriq were administered every three weeks (q3w)

An expansion cohort to enable immune profiling of serial tumour biopsies was also enrolled

28 patients were treated in eight dose-escalation cohorts (MOXR0916 dose levels 0.8–1200 mg) and 23 additional patients were treated in the serial biopsy cohort

— The median number of prior therapies for metastatic disease was two (range 0–7) and nine patients had received prior PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies

Results:
No dose-limiting toxicities, Grade 4/5 adverse events (AEs) attributed to study treatment or related AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported

— The majority of treatment-related AEs were Grade 1 in severity; one related Grade 3 event (pneumonitis responsive to corticosteroids) was reported

Evidence of immune activation, including upregulation of PD-L1, was observed in paired tumour biopsies from some patients, including patients whose immediate prior therapy was anti-PD-1

The regimen selected for dose expansion is MOXR0916 300 mg + Tecentriq 1200 mg q3w. Evaluation of efficacy is ongoing in expansion cohorts for patients with melanoma, RCC, NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, and TNBC.

About Roche in cancer immunotherapy
For more than 50 years, Roche has been developing medicines with the goal to redefine treatment in oncology. Today, we’re investing more than ever in our effort to bring innovative treatment options that help a person’s own immune system fight cancer.

About personalised cancer immunotherapy
The aim of personalised cancer immunotherapy (PCI) is to provide individual patients with treatment options that are tailored to their specific needs. The Roche PCI research and development programme comprises more than 20 investigational candidates, nine of which are in clinical trials. All studies include the prospective evaluation of biomarkers to determine which people may be appropriate candidates for Roche medicines. In the case of Tecentriq, PCI begins with the PD-L1 (programmed death ligand-1) IHC assay based on the SP142 antibody developed by Roche Tissue Diagnostics. The goal of PD-L1 as a biomarker is to identify those people most likely to experience clinical benefit with Tecentriq as a single agent versus those who may benefit more from combination approaches; the purpose is to inform treatment strategies which will give the greatest number of patients a chance for transformative benefit. The ability to combine TECENTRIQ with multiple chemotherapies may provide new treatment options to people across a broad range of tumours regardless of their level of PD-L1 expression.

PCI is an essential component of how Roche delivers on the broader commitment to personalised healthcare.

About Tecentriq (atezolizumab)
Tecentriq is a monoclonal antibody designed to bind with a protein called PD-L1. Tecentriq is designed to directly bind to PD-L1 expressed on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells, blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors. By inhibiting PD-L1, Tecentriq may enable the activation of T cells. Tecentriq may also affect normal cells.

About MOXR0916 (anti-OX40)
MOXR0916 is an agonist monoclonal antibody that targets OX40, a costimulatory receptor that is expressed by T cells, and results in activation rather than blockade of the OX40 signaling pathway. MOXR0916 is thought to promote anti-tumour immunity by binding to OX40 on both antigen-experienced effector T cells, thereby enhancing their proliferation and survival, and on activated regulatory T cells, thereby inhibiting their suppressive function. Because Tecentriq and MOXR0916 act through distinct but complementary mechanisms, in combination these investigational immunotherapies have the potential to enhance activation of CD8+ T-cells that mediate anti-tumour immune responses.

Celldex Therapeutics’ CDX‑1401, CDX‑301 Combination Generates Potent NY-ESO-1 Immune Responses in Patients with Melanoma

On June 04, 2016 Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:CLDX) reported results from a Phase 2 clinical study evaluating CDX‑1401 and CDX‑301 in patients with malignant melanoma, which was conducted by the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN) under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) between Celldex and the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute (Press release, Celldex Therapeutics, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512995]). CDX‑1401 is an NY‑ESO‑1-antibody fusion protein for immunotherapy, and CDX‑301 (recombinant human Flt3 ligand) is a potent hematopoietic cytokine that uniquely expands dendritic cells and hematopoietic stem cells. Results from the study were presented at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago in a poster titled "A Phase 2, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized Study of CDX‑1401, a Dendritic Cell Targeting NY‑ESO‑1 Vaccine, in Patients with Malignant Melanoma Pre-Treated with CDX‑301, a Recombinant Human Flt3 Ligand."

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The study randomized 60 patients with resected stage IIb through IV melanoma into two cohorts (n=30 each) to assess whether the immune response to NY-ESO-1 elicited by CDX-1401 could be substantially increased by pre-treatment with CDX-301 to expand the number of dendritic cells, which are key cells in initiating immune responses. As this study was intended primarily for safety and immune endpoints, patients were not selected for NY‑ESO‑1 expression. Both treatment cohorts received four monthly cycles of CDX‑1401 and poly-ICLC (Hiltonol). Cohort 1 received pre-treatment with CDX‑301 for the first two cycles, whereas Cohort 2 did not receive CDX‑301. Both combination regimens were well tolerated, and no drug-related adverse events required discontinuation from treatment.

NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses were significantly greater and developed earlier in Cohort 1 compared to Cohort 2. In addition, all patients in Cohort 1 (n=30) achieved a specific NY-ESO-1-specific T cell response compared to 22 out of 30 patients in Cohort 2. Substantial increases in innate immune cells (dendritic cells, natural killer cells and monocytes) and greater increases in antibody titer were observed in the CDX‑301 pre-treated Cohort 1.

"The Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network has prioritized CDX-301 as a dendritic cell growth factor. The current study validates that Flt3 ligand can greatly expand peripheral blood dendritic cells and is highly effective at immunizing cancer antigen specific T cells when combined with CDX-1401, the immunotherapy that delivers NY‑ESO‑1 to dendritic cells," said Martin "Mac" Cheever, M.D., a member of the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Professor of Medicine at the University of Washington and Director of the Fred Hutch-based Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network. "These results, which show rapid cellular immune responses in a majority of patients, should stimulate significant interest in what appears to be a highly applicable, effective immunologic approach."

"This study confirms that CDX-1401 is effective at driving NY-ESO-1 immunity and further shows the value of CDX-301 as a combination agent for enhancing tumor-specific immune responses," said Thomas Davis, M.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer of Celldex Therapeutics. "With these results, we are initiating a targeted study in patients with NY‑ESO‑1 positive disease to determine if these enhanced immune responses can translate to improved clinical outcomes. This also provides exciting new opportunities for use of CDX-301 in other combination immunotherapy regimens."

The poster is available on the "Publications" page of the "Science" section of the Celldex website.

About CDX‑301
CDX‑301 (Flt3L) is a potent hematopoietic cytokine that has demonstrated a unique capacity to increase the number of circulating dendritic cells in both laboratory and clinical studies. In addition, CDX‑301 has shown impressive results in models of cancer, infectious diseases and inflammatory/autoimmune diseases. Celldex believes this ligand may hold significant opportunity for synergistic development in combination with other proprietary molecules in the Company’s portfolio.

About CDX‑1401
CDX‑1401 is an NY‑ESO‑1-antibody fusion protein for immunotherapy, which is designed to activate the patient’s immune system against cancers that express the tumor marker, NY‑ESO‑1. CDX‑1401 consists of a fully human monoclonal antibody with specificity for the dendritic cell receptor DEC‑205 genetically linked to the NY‑ESO‑1 tumor antigen. Celldex has accessed NY‑ESO‑1 through a licensing agreement with the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. By selectively delivering the NY‑ESO‑1 antigen to dendritic cells in the body, CDX‑1401 is intended to induce robust immune responses against the antigen-expressing cancer cells.

Data Presented at ASCO 2016 Builds upon Foundation of Abraxane® Plus Gemcitabine as a First-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

On June 4, 2016 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG) reported that results from multiple sponsored and independent studies presented during the 52nd ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting evaluated the use of ABRAXANE (paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension)(albumin-bound) in combination with gemcitabine in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer (Press release, Celgene, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512994]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"This year’s ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) meeting continues to evaluate sequential therapy with ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine in the first-line and as a combination partner for investigational agents to treat metastatic pancreatic cancer," said Michael Pehl, President, Hematology and Oncology for Celgene. "The ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine combination is playing a key part in research designed to advance care for patients in this historically challenging disease."

Evaluating a Treatment Plan in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

For patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, important considerations in defining a treatment plan include sequence, patient characteristics, comparative effectiveness and cost. At ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 health outcomes analyses evaluating the treatment sequence with ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine as the first-line option are being presented.

An Italian multi-center real-life retrospective analysis highlighted outcomes of 122 patients who received first-line ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine followed by second-line treatment. (Abstract #4124 – Giordano). Second line treatments included FOLFOX/XELOX (45%). FOLFIRI (22%), FOLFIRINOX (18%), and other single agent therapies (15%). Median overall survival for patients receiving a second-line therapy following ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine was 13.5 months (95% CI 12.659-14.341), compared with 6.8 months for patients (99 patients) receiving BSC (95% CI 5.567-8.033), p < 0.0001. Also of note in the research presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) were two studies evaluating ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine in patients who exhibited elevated bilirubin levels, a common disease effect in metastatic pancreatic cancer. These studies provide insight into this patient population, which was excluded from the Phase III study of ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine.

In one observational interim analysis (Abstract #e15739 – zur Hausen), 20 (of 219) patients with a mean bilirubin level of 4.4 mg/dl (1.5-12.9) at baseline were followed for up to 4 cycles of ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine and methods of hyperbilirubinaemia were assessed. The mean bilirubin level of these patients dropped to 1.8 mg/dl (0.35-14.1; p=0.031) by the 2nd cycle. There were 14 (70%) patients that started treatment with a standard dosage and 6 (30%) that started with a reduced dose. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen in 70 percent of patients with the most common being leukopenia, anemia and fever (each 20%).

An additional analysis of 29 patients (Abstract #e15717 – Pelzer) examined safety and survival with ABRAXANE/Gemcitabine in patients with elevated total bilirubin levels (≥ 1.2 to > 5 x ULN).

Administration of ABRAXANE in patients with hepatic impairment should be performed with caution. Patients with hepatic impairment may be at increased risk of toxicity, particularly from myelosuppression; such patients should be closely monitored for development of profound myelosuppression. According to the prescribing information, ABRAXANE is not recommended in patients who have total bilirubin > 5 x ULN or AST > 10 x ULN.

Multiple studies evaluated real-world comparative effectiveness and economic evaluations of first-line metastatic pancreatic treatments.

An independent, retrospective, Canadian comparative effectiveness analysis of ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine alone (Abstract #6561 – Wang) in five British Columbia cancer centers found the median overall survival of these treatments was 8.5 months for ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine (n=59), 7.8 months for FOLFIRINOX (n=59) and 3.1 months for gemcitabine alone. The analysis noted that patients receiving FOLFIRINOX were significantly younger (p < 0.001), had better performance status (p < 0.001) and had less disease burden at presentation (p=0.049), compared with ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicities occurred in 36% of patients receiving FOLFIRINOX, 17% of patients receiving ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine and 23% of patients receiving gemcitabine alone.

A retrospective review of U.S. de-identified hospital data (Abstract #e15741 – Kim) evaluated the median time to treatment discontinuation and cost of ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX in the first-line setting. In this analysis, patients treated with FOLFIRINOX had higher median total monthly treatment costs compared to ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine ($18,743 vs. $12,192; p < 0.05).

ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine as a foundation for investigational combinations in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Multiple studies presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) also evaluated ABRAXANE in combination with potential new agents in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer. Agents being evaluated in combination with ABRAXANE plus gemcitabine in the first line include PEGPH20 (Abstract #4104 – Bullock), necuparanib (Abstract # 4117 – O’Reilly), indoximod (Abstract #3020 – Bahary) and napabucasin (Abstract #4128 – El-Rayes).

About ABRAXANE

ABRAXANE is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, in combination with gemcitabine.

Important Safety Information

WARNING – NEUTROPENIA

Do not administer ABRAXANE therapy to patients who have baseline neutrophil counts of less than 1500 cells/mm3. In order to monitor the occurrence of bone marrow suppression, primarily neutropenia, which may be severe and result in infection, it is recommended that frequent peripheral blood cell counts be performed on all patients receiving ABRAXANE
Note: An albumin form of paclitaxel may substantially affect a drug’s functional properties relative to those of drug in solution. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR OR WITH OTHER PACLITAXEL FORMULATIONS
CONTRAINDICATIONS

Neutrophil Counts

ABRAXANE should not be used in patients who have baseline neutrophil counts of < 1500 cells/mm3
Hypersensitivity

Patients who experience a severe hypersensitivity reaction to ABRAXANE should not be rechallenged with the drug
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Hematologic Effects

Bone marrow suppression (primarily neutropenia) is dose-dependent and a dose-limiting toxicity of ABRAXANE. In a clinical study, Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 38% of patients with pancreatic cancer
Monitor for myelotoxicity by performing complete blood cell counts frequently, including prior to dosing on Days 1, 8, and 15 for pancreatic cancer
Do not administer ABRAXANE to patients with baseline absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) of less than 1500 cells/mm3
In patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, withhold ABRAXANE and gemcitabine if the ANC is less than 500 cells/mm3 or platelets are less than 50,000 cells/mm3 and delay initiation of the next cycle if the ANC is less than 1500 cells/mm3 or platelet count is less than 100,000 cells/mm3 on Day 1 of the cycle. Resume treatment with appropriate dose reduction if recommended
Nervous System

Sensory neuropathy is dose- and schedule-dependent
The occurrence of Grade 1 or 2 sensory neuropathy does not generally require dose modification
If ≥ Grade 3 sensory neuropathy develops, withhold ABRAXANE treatment until resolution to ≤ Grade 1 followed by a dose reduction for all subsequent courses of ABRAXANE
Sepsis

Sepsis occurred in 5% of patients with or without neutropenia who received ABRAXANE in combination with gemcitabine
Biliary obstruction or presence of biliary stent were risk factors for severe or fatal sepsis
If a patient becomes febrile (regardless of ANC), initiate treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics
For febrile neutropenia, interrupt ABRAXANE and gemcitabine until fever resolves and ANC ≥1500 cells/mm3, then resume treatment at reduced dose levels
Pneumonitis

Pneumonitis, including some cases that were fatal, occurred in 4% of patients receiving ABRAXANE in combination with gemcitabine
Monitor patients for signs and symptoms and interrupt ABRAXANE and gemcitabine during evaluation of suspected pneumonitis
Permanently discontinue treatment with ABRAXANE and gemcitabine upon making a diagnosis of pneumonitis
Hypersensitivity

Severe and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, have been reported
Patients who experience a severe hypersensitivity reaction to ABRAXANE should not be rechallenged with this drug
Hepatic Impairment

Because the exposure and toxicity of paclitaxel can be increased with hepatic impairment, administration of ABRAXANE in patients with hepatic impairment should be performed with caution
Patients with hepatic impairment may be at an increased risk of toxicity, particularly from myelosuppression, and should be monitored for development of profound myelosuppression
For pancreatic adenocarcinoma, ABRAXANE is not recommended for patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN and AST ≤10 x ULN)
Albumin (Human)

ABRAXANE contains albumin (human), a derivative of human blood
Use in Pregnancy: Pregnancy Category D

ABRAXANE can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman
If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while receiving this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus
Women of childbearing potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant while receiving ABRAXANE
Use in Men

Men should be advised not to father a child while receiving ABRAXANE
ADVERSE REACTIONS

Among the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the phase III study, those with a ≥5% higher incidence in the ABRAXANE/gemcitabine group compared with the gemcitabine group are neutropenia (73%, 58%), fatigue (59%, 46%), peripheral neuropathy (54%, 13%), nausea (54%, 48%), alopecia (50%, 5%), peripheral edema (46%, 30%), diarrhea (44%, 24%), pyrexia (41%, 28%), vomiting (36%, 28%), decreased appetite (36%, 26%), rash (30%, 11%), and dehydration (21%, 11%)
Of these most common adverse reactions, those with a ≥2% higher incidence of Grade 3-4 toxicity in the ABRAXANE/gemcitabine group compared with the gemcitabine group, respectively, are neutropenia (38%, 27%), fatigue (18%, 9%), peripheral neuropathy (17%, 1%), nausea (6%, 3%), diarrhea (6%, 1%), pyrexia (3%, 1%), vomiting (6%, 4%), decreased appetite (5%, 2%), and dehydration (7%, 2%)
Thrombocytopenia (all grades) was reported in 74% of patients in the ABRAXANE/gemcitabine group vs 70% of patients in the gemcitabine group
The most common serious adverse reactions of ABRAXANE (with a ≥1% higher incidence) are pyrexia (6%), dehydration (5%), pneumonia (4%), and vomiting (4%)
The most common adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of ABRAXANE were peripheral neuropathy (8%), fatigue (4%), and thrombocytopenia (2%)
The most common adverse reactions resulting in dose reduction of ABRAXANE are neutropenia (10%) and peripheral neuropathy (6%)
The most common adverse reactions leading to withholding or delay in ABRAXANE dosing are neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (12%), fatigue (8%), peripheral neuropathy (15%), anemia (5%), and diarrhea (5%)
Other selected adverse reactions with a ≥5% higher incidence for all-grade toxicity in the ABRAXANE/gemcitabine group compared to the gemcitabine group, respectively, are asthenia (19%, 13%), mucositis (10%, 4%), dysgeusia (16%, 8%), headache (14%, 9%), hypokalemia (12%, 7%), cough (17%, 7%), epistaxis (15%, 3%), urinary tract infection (11%, 5%), pain in extremity (11%, 6%), arthralgia (11%, 3%), myalgia (10%, 4%), and depression (12%, 6%)
Other selected adverse reactions with a ≥2% higher incidence for Grade 3-4 toxicity in the ABRAXANE/gemcitabine group compared to the gemcitabine group are thrombocytopenia (13%, 9%), asthenia (7%, 4%), and hypokalemia (4%, 1%)
Postmarketing Experience With ABRAXANE and Other Paclitaxel Formulations

Severe and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been reported with ABRAXANE. The use of ABRAXANE in patients previously exhibiting hypersensitivity to paclitaxel injection or human albumin has not been studied
There have been reports of congestive heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, and atrioventricular block with ABRAXANE, primarily among individuals with underlying cardiac history or prior exposure to cardiotoxic drugs
There have been reports of extravasation of ABRAXANE. Given the possibility of extravasation, it is advisable to monitor closely the ABRAXANE infusion site for possible infiltration during drug administration
DRUG INTERACTIONS

Caution should be exercised when administering ABRAXANE concomitantly with medicines known to inhibit or induce either CYP2C8 or CYP3A4
USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Nursing Mothers

It is not known whether paclitaxel is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants, a decision should be made to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother
Pediatric

The safety and effectiveness of ABRAXANE in pediatric patients have not been evaluated
Geriatric

Diarrhea, decreased appetite, dehydration, and epistaxis were more frequent in patients 65 years or older compared with patients younger than 65 years old who received ABRAXANE and gemcitabine in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
Renal Impairment

There are insufficient data to permit dosage recommendations in patients with severe renal impairment or end stage renal disease (estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min)
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Do not administer ABRAXANE to patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have moderate to severe hepatic impairment
Do not administer ABRAXANE to any patient with total bilirubin greater than 5 x ULN or AST greater than 10 x ULN
Dose reductions or discontinuation may be needed based on severe hematologic, neurologic, cutaneous, or gastrointestinal toxicity
Monitor patients closely
Please see full Prescribing Information, including Boxed WARNING.