Two Phase 3 Studies Reinforce Sustained Benefits of Treatment with Jakafi® (ruxolitinib) in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)

On December 5, 2015 Incyte Corporation (Nasdaq:INCY) reported data from two Phase 3 studies evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of Jakafi (ruxolitinib) in patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) (Press release, Incyte, DEC 5, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2120390 [SID:1234508420]). In myelofibrosis (MF), results of a five-year follow-up from the COMFORT-II study demonstrate a continued survival benefit in patients originally randomized to ruxolitinib compared with patients randomized to best available therapy (BAT), with a 33 percent reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.44-1.02; P=.06). Because patients in the BAT arm had crossed over to receive ruxolitinib therapy (median 17 months after randomization), these data may suggest that earlier treatment with ruxolitinib may be associated with improved long-term survival in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF. Additionally, 53 percent of patients treated with ruxolitinib (n=78/146) achieved at least a 35 percent reduction in spleen volume from baseline that was sustained over time (median duration 3.2 years).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These data from the COMFORT-II study reinforce the positive and long-term clinical benefits seen in patients with myelofibrosis who are treated with Jakafi," said Rich Levy, MD, Chief Drug Development Officer, Incyte. "The reduction in the risk of death and the sustained improvements in spleen volume are meaningful and important results for the community of patients with this rare blood cancer."

An analysis of the RESPONSE study is also planned for presentation at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper). Previously published results in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that treatment with ruxolitinib, compared to standard therapy improved hematocrit control and reduced spleen volume in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who had an inadequate response to or had unacceptable side effects from hydroxyurea (HU). The data at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) demonstrate that in patients with elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts at baseline, a greater proportion of patients in the ruxolitinib treatment arm (45%) achieved normalization of their WBC counts (achieving a WBC ≤10×109/L or a ≥50% reduction from baseline) compared to BAT (22%) or HU (9%) at week 32.
These data are scheduled for presentation at the 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting taking place December 5-8, 2015 in Orlando, FL.

Results from the COMFORT-II Study

Data from a five-year follow-up of the COMFORT-II trial, a randomized, open-label Phase 3 study evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-PV myelofibrosis, or post-ET myelofibrosis, allowing crossover from the BAT arm to ruxolitinib after 48 weeks upon protocol-defined progression, revealed that 53 percent of patients treated with ruxolitinib (n=78/146) achieved at least a 35 percent reduction in spleen volume from baseline while on treatment during the study. Additionally, approximately one-third of evaluable JAK2 V617F-positive patients had more than a 20 percent reduction in allele burden at 3.2 years (38%) and 3.7 years (31%). Patients treated with ruxolitinib also experienced improvements in bone marrow fibrosis (15.8%) with 32.2 percent reporting stable fibrosis scores.

Overall, 59 (40%) and 35 (48%) deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the ruxolitinib arm and was 4.1 years in the group of patients originally receiving BAT. There was a 33 percent reduction in risk of death with ruxolitinib (HR, 0.67; 95 percent CI, 0.44-1.02; P=.06). The estimated probability of survival at 5 years was 56 percent with ruxolitinib and 44 percent with patients originally receiving BAT. At week 48, BAT patients were allowed to cross over to receive ruxolitinib upon protocol-defined progression and after week 48 all BAT patients, irrespective of their progression status, were allowed to crossover to receive ruxolitinib; therefore, a confounding effect on OS was observed. An analysis correcting for crossover will be presented.

Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with those reported in previous studies of ruxolitinib and there was no increase in the incidence of AEs with longer exposure to treatment.

COMFORT-II is scheduled for presentation as an oral session by Dr. Claire Harrison, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy’s Hospital, Saturday, December 5, 2015, 9:30-11:30 AM EST, Room W224.

Results from the RESPONSE Study
The RESPONSE trial is a Phase 3 open-label study evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with PV compared to BAT who had an inadequate response to or had unacceptable side effects from HU. The analysis from RESPONSE to be presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) shows that patients who received ruxolitinib had greater mean reductions in WBC counts compared with BAT or the HU subgroup of the BAT arm, and these reductions were maintained over time. In patients with baseline WBC counts ≥11×109/L, worsening WBC counts were observed in 10.8 percent of patients in the ruxolitinib arm versus 35.4 percent in the BAT arm (P=0.0002) and 47.8 percent in the HU subgroup (P<0.0001). In this same subgroup of patients with elevated WBC counts at baseline, a greater proportion of patients in the ruxolitinib arm (45%) normalized their WBC counts (achieving a WBC ≤10×109/L or a ≥50% reduction from baseline) compared with BAT (22%) or HU (9%) at week 32. The median time to achieve this response with ruxolitinib therapy was 8 weeks.

These data are scheduled for presentation as a poster session by Dr. Carole Miller, Saint Agnes Cancer Institute, Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00-8:00 PM EST, Hall A.

About Myelofibrosis
MF is part of a group of related rare blood cancers known as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) where a patient’s bone marrow can no longer produce enough normal blood cells, causing the spleen to enlarge1. As a result, patients with MF may suffer from debilitating symptoms and have a poor quality of life2. After diagnosis, patients with MF have a decreased life expectancy, with an average survival of approximately five to six years3. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation may cure MF, the procedure is associated with significant morbidity and transplant-related mortality, and is available to less than 5% of patients who are young and fit enough to undergo the procedure4.

About Polycythemia Vera
Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and is typically characterized by elevated hematocrit, the volume percentage of red blood cells in whole blood, which can lead to a thickening of the blood and an increased risk of blood clots, as well as an elevated white blood cell and platelet count5. Patients with PV who fail to consistently maintain appropriate blood count levels, including appropriate hematocrit levels, have an approximately four times higher risk of major thrombosis (blood clots) or cardiovascular death6. Patients with PV can also suffer from an enlarged spleen and a significant symptom burden which may be attributed to thickening of the blood and lack of oxygen to parts of the body7. These symptoms commonly include fatigue, itching, night sweats, bone pain, fever, and weight loss8.

Approximately 100,000 patients in the U.S. are living with PV9. Current standard treatment for PV is phlebotomy (the removal of blood from the body) plus aspirin. When phlebotomy can no longer control PV, chemotherapy such as hydroxyurea, or interferon, is utilized10,11. Approximately one in four patients with PV are considered uncontrolled12,13 because they have an inadequate response to or are intolerant of hydroxyurea, the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of PV.

About Jakafi (ruxolitinib)

Jakafi is a first-in-class JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for treatment of people with polycythemia vera (PV) who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of hydroxyurea.

Jakafi is also indicated for treatment of people with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF), including primary MF, post–polycythemia vera MF, and post–essential thrombocythemia MF.

Jakafi is marketed by Incyte in the United States and by Novartis as Jakavi (ruxolitinib) outside the United States.

Important Safety Information

Jakafi can cause serious side effects, including:
Low blood counts: Jakafi may cause your platelet, red blood cell, or white blood cell counts to be lowered. If you develop bleeding, stop taking Jakafi and call your healthcare provider. Your healthcare provider will perform blood tests to check your blood counts before you start Jakafi and regularly during your treatment. Your healthcare provider may change your dose of Jakafi or stop your treatment based on the results of your blood tests. Tell your healthcare provider right away if you experience unusual bleeding, bruising, fatigue, shortness of breath, or a fever.

Infection: You may be at risk for developing a serious infection during treatment with Jakafi. Tell your healthcare provider if you develop any of the following symptoms of infection: chills, nausea, vomiting, aches, weakness, fever, painful skin rash or blisters.
Skin cancers: Some people who take Jakafi have developed certain types of non-melanoma skin cancers. Tell your healthcare provider if you develop any new or changing skin lesions.

The most common side effects of Jakafi include: anemia, low platelet count, bruising, dizziness, headache.
These are not all the possible side effects of Jakafi. Ask your pharmacist or healthcare provider for more information. Tell your healthcare provider about any side effect that bothers you or that does not go away.

Before taking Jakafi, tell your healthcare provider about all the medications, vitamins, and herbal supplements you are taking and all your medical conditions, including if you have an infection, have or had tuberculosis (TB), or have been in close contact with someone who has TB, have or had liver or kidney problems, are on dialysis, had skin cancer or have any other medical condition. Take Jakafi exactly as your healthcare provider tells you. Do not change or stop taking Jakafi without first talking to your healthcare provider. Do not drink grapefruit juice while on Jakafi.

Women should not take Jakafi while pregnant or planning to become pregnant, or if breast-feeding.

Full Prescribing Information, including a more complete discussion of the risks associated with Jakafi, is available at www.jakafi.com.

New results from CLL11 study show Gazyva/Gazyvaro provided people with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia a treatment-free period of nearly four years

On December 5, 2015 Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) reported updated data from the pivotal CLL11 study confirming that Gazyva/Gazyvaro (obinutuzumab) plus chlorambucil reduced the risk of disease worsening or death by more than half compared to MabThera/Rituxan (rituximab) plus chlorambucil (progression-free survival, PFS; HR=0.46, median PFS 28.7 months versus 15.7 months; p<0.0001) (Press release, Hoffmann-La Roche , DEC 5, 2015, View Source [SID:1234508417]). New results to be presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting from a secondary endpoint that measured time to next treatment (TTNT) showed that, after completing the set six-month Gazyva/Gazyvaro regimen, people remained treatment-free for nearly four years on average before needing the next treatment for their cancer (TTNT; 51.1 months, including the six month initial treatment period). No unexpected safety signals were observed with Gazyva/Gazyvaro.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These updated CLL11 data confirmed that Gazyva/Gazyvaro helped people with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia live significantly longer without disease worsening or death compared to MabThera/Rituxan," said Sandra Horning, MD, Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. "After a fixed course of therapy with Gazyva/Gazyvaro, people remained treatment-free for nearly four years on average. Time free from treatment is an important consideration for a disease like CLL, which occurs in older adults who frequently have other health issues. "

In the GREEN safety study, data from a subgroup analysis showed there were no unexpected safety signals when Gazyva/Gazyvaro was combined with bendamustine. In addition, nearly 80 percent of people responded to treatment with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus bendamustine (overall response, ORR), and a third of people (32.3 percent) achieved a complete response (CR). A substantial number of people were also minimal residual disease (MRD) negative when measured in the bone marrow or blood (28 percent and 59 percent, respectively), which means no cancer can be detected using a specific test. Overall response rate and MRD were secondary endpoints of the study.

Gazyva/Gazyvaro in combination with chlorambucil is approved in the United States for use in people with previously untreated CLL and in the EU for use in people with previously untreated CLL who have comorbidities making them unsuitable for an intensive therapy (full-dose fludarabine based therapy).

About the CLL11 study
CLL11 is a Phase III, multicentre, open-label, randomised three-arm study investigating the efficacy and safety profile of Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil, MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil and chlorambucil alone in 781 people with previously untreated CLL. Stage 1a (n=589) compared Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil to chlorambucil alone and MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil to chlorambucil alone. Stage 2 (n=663) compared Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil with MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil.

The primary endpoint of the study was PFS and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response rate (CR), response duration, disease free survival (DFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and safety profile.

The updated analysis from CLL11 will be presented at a poster session on Saturday 5 December at 5:30 pm EST (Abstract #1733).

About the GREEN study
GREEN is an ongoing Phase IIIb safety study. This multicentre, open-label, single-arm study is evaluating the safety and efficacy of Gazyva/Gazyvaro alone or in combination with chemotherapy, including bendamustine, in people with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL. The primary endpoint of the study was safety with secondary endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity.
The study included a subgroup of people who were previously untreated and who received treatment with Gazyva/Gazyvaro in combination with bendamustine. Data from this subgroup analysis will be presented at an oral presentation on Monday, 7 December at 7:00 am EST (Abstract #493).

About Gazyva/Gazyvaro (obinutuzumab)
Gazyva/Gazyvaro is an engineered monoclonal antibody designed to attach to CD20, a protein found only on B-cells. Gazyva/Gazyvaro is designed to attack and destroy targeted B-cells both directly and together with the body’s immune system.
Gazyva/Gazyvaro is currently approved in more than 60 countries in combination with chlorambucil, for people with previously untreated CLL. The approval was based on the CLL11 study, showing significant improvements with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil across multiple clinical endpoints, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), and minimal residual disease (MRD) when compared head-to-head with MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil.
Gazyva is marketed as Gazyvaro in the EU and Switzerland.

Gazyva/Gazyvaro is being studied in a large clinical programme, including the Phase III GOYA and GALLIUM studies. GOYA is comparing Gazyva/Gazyvaro head-to-head with MabThera/Rituxan plus CHOP chemotherapy in first line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and GALLIUM is comparing Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chemotherapy followed by Gazyva/Gazyvaro maintenance head-to-head with MabThera/Rituxan plus chemotherapy followed by MabThera/Rituxan maintenance in first line indolent non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL). Additional combination studies investigating Gazyva/Gazyvaro with other approved or investigational medicines, including cancer immunotherapies and small molecule inhibitors, are planned or underway across a range of blood cancers.

About CLL
CLL is the most common type of leukaemia in the Western world. It accounts for 25-30% of all leukaemias1, equating to over 80,000 cases of CLL being diagnosed each year2.

Dynavax Presents Clinical Data From Lead Cancer Immunotherapy Candidate, SD-101, at ASH Annual Meeting

On December 5, 2015 Dynavax Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: DVAX) reported clinical data from an ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating intratumoral administration of SD-101 in the treatment of low-grade lymphoma (Press release, Dynavax Technologies, DEC 5, 2015, View Source [SID:1234508416]). The combination of intratumoral SD-101 and low-dose irradiation resulted in tumor regression in untreated tumor sites as well as in the treated tumors. Treatment was well-tolerated and changes in T cell populations consistent with stimulation of anti-tumor immunity were observed in the treated lesions. These data were presented in a poster session on Saturday at the 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Data from the dose escalation phase of the study were reported from 13 evaluable patients. None of the patients had received prior treatment for their low-grade lymphoma. The primary endpoints of the trial are maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluation of the safety of intratumoral SD-101 in combination with low dose radiotherapy. In addition, the trial is evaluating anti-tumor activity, pharmacodynamics, and duration of response. Doses ranged from 1 mg to 8 mg per injection in successive cohorts.

Key findings presented include:

Of the 13 evaluable patients treated across all dose levels, 11 patients (84.6%) were observed to have regression of non-treated, non-irradiated tumors at Day 90 (reductions range from 0.9% to 48.2 %), indicating abscopal effect. One patient reached a partial response (PR) per Cheson criteria at Day 180.

There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and an MTD was not identified. The most common treatment-related adverse events were local injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms, including fever, chills, and myalgia. There have been no serious adverse events related to the treatment.

T cells increased at the treated site in 7 of 10 patients ranging from > 300% to 18%. Both CD4 and CD8 T cells increased in 5 of 7 patients. In addition, TReg cells were depleted at the treated site an average of 22.3 + 9.5% in 8 of 10 patients. Tfh cells showed a significant reduction of 83.3 + 9.9%.

"The first report of clinical responses and changes in T cell populations presented today provide encouraging evidence that immune modulating therapies such as SD-101 can be delivered directly into a tumor to promote changes in the tumor microenvironment and induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response. We look forward to providing future updates as this study and other studies evaluating SD-101 in combination with checkpoint blockade progress," said Eddie Gray, Chief Executive Officer of Dynavax.

To see the poster presentation in its entirety, please visit the Presentations section located in the Investor section of the Dynavax website.

About SD-101

SD-101, the subject of ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) abstract 1539, is Dynavax’s proprietary, second-generation, TLR 9 agonist CpG-C class oligodeoxynucleotide. SD-101 activates multiple anti-tumor activities of innate immune cells and activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells to stimulate T cells specific for antigens released from dying tumor cells. TLR9 agonists such as SD-101 enhance T and B cell responses and provide potent Type 1 interferon induction and maturation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells to antigen-presenting cells. SD-101 is being evaluated in several Phase 1/2 oncology studies to assess its preliminary safety and activity.

Analysis of Pivotal Phase 3 Patient Outcomes by Subgroups Shows Treatment with Pacritinib Resulted in Consistent Rates of Reduction in Spleen Volume and Symptom Burden

On December 5, 2015 CTI BioPharma Corp. (CTI BioPharma) (NASDAQ and MTA: CTIC) and Baxalta Incorporated (Baxalta) (NYSE: BXLT) reported results from a new analysis of the pivotal Phase 3 trial, PERSIST-1, evaluating pacritinib versus best available therapy, excluding treatment with JAK2 inhibitors (BAT), in patients with myelofibrosis (Press release, CTI BioPharma, DEC 5, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2120391 [SID:1234508415]). Data examining patient outcomes across baseline demographic factors that are associated with prognosis – including age, baseline hemoglobin, baseline platelet count, ECOG status, JAK2 mutation status and red blood cell transfusion dependency – showed that treatment with pacritinib resulted in consistent rates of spleen volume reduction and control of disease-related symptoms across all intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis subgroups. These findings were presented by Alessandro M. Vannucchi, M.D., associate professor of Hematology, University of Florence, Italy, during an oral presentation at the 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) (ASH 2015) Annual Meeting & Exposition in Orlando (Abstract #58).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Pacritinib is an investigational oral multikinase inhibitor with specificity for JAK2, FLT3, IRAK1 and CSF1R, which are kinases found to be involved in the growth and spread of myelofibrosis and other blood-related cancers such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

"Reducing the burden of myelofibrosis-related symptoms is an important goal of treatment. However, for patients diagnosed with this rare blood cancer, there are limited therapeutic options – a gap that is even more significant for patients with low platelet counts," said Prof. Vannucchi. "These data presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2015 are important and clinically meaningful as they demonstrate pacritinib’s potential to achieve treatment goals across intermediate or high-risk patients with myelofibrosis, regardless of baseline characteristics including starting platelet count."

Myelofibrosis is a rare blood cancer associated with significantly reduced quality of life and shortened survival. Most patients with the disease present with enlarged spleens (splenomegaly), as well as many other potentially devastating physical symptoms such as abdominal discomfort, bone pain, feeling full after eating little, severe itching, night sweats and extreme fatigue.

"The results from this analysis add to the growing body of data for pacritinib suggesting it is a unique JAK inhibitor with a differentiated efficacy and safety profile that is not limited by the baseline characteristics of patients with myelofibrosis," said James Bianco, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer, CTI BioPharma. "We believe pacritinib has the potential to fill a gap that exists for many patients whose lives are profoundly impacted by myelofibrosis, particularly those patients with low platelet counts."

"We are developing pacritinib with particular focus on targeting the underlying biology of myelofibrosis to improve the treatment landscape for patients with this underserved, progressive disease, including those in intermediate and high-risk subgroups," said David Meek, Executive Vice President and President, Oncology at Baxalta. "We look forward to working with worldwide regulatory authorities to advance treatment options for all patients with myelofibrosis as we begin our registration submissions for pacritinib in the coming months."

About the Subgroup Analysis
Findings presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2015 were based on the analysis of baseline patients’ characteristics from PERSIST-1, a randomized Phase 3 registration-directed trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pacritinib to BAT that included a broad range of currently utilized treatments. As previously reported, the trial met its primary endpoint of spleen volume reduction (35 percent or greater from baseline to Week 24 by MRI/CT scan) in the intent-to-treat population.

The subgroup analysis discussed above assessed results observed in patients achieving 35 percent or greater spleen volume reduction from baseline or a decrease of 50 percent or more in Total Symptom Score (TSS) by baseline characteristics or risk factors, including initial platelet count, JAK2V617F mutation status, red blood cell transfusions and bone pain. Findings showed that results (from the primary analysis) were consistent across all subgroups evaluated. Achievement of 35 percent or greater spleen volume reduction was independent of most risk factors assessed and a 50 percent or more decrease in TSS was independent of characteristics evaluated, except bone pain score greater than three at baseline.

The most common adverse events in the pacritinib arm vs. BAT that showed more than 5 percent difference were diarrhea (57 percent vs. 12 percent), nausea (29 percent vs. 6 percent) and vomiting (19 percent vs. 5 percent). No Grade 4 gastrointestinal events were reported.

Additional Pacritinib Data Presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper)
Also presented today were patient-reported outcome data that examined the relationship between myelofibrosis-associated symptoms (based on the TSS) and changes in splenomegaly and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in the PERSIST-1 overall patient population and in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. The analysis showed TSS response was associated with improvements in spleen volume response and perceived Overall Health State; this trend was also observed in patients with low baseline platelet counts (<50,000/µL and <100,000/ µL). In all patient populations analyzed, TSS response was significantly associated with improvements in fatigue, a major contributor to poor HRQoL in patients with myelofibrosis. Significant improvements in social functioning, appetite loss and insomnia were also observed in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. These data were presented in a poster presentation by Ruben Mesa, M.D., Chair, Hematology and Medical Oncology Division, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ (Abstract #1609).

About PERSIST-1
PERSIST-1 is a randomized (2:1), controlled Phase 3 registration-directed trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pacritinib to BAT – which included a broad range of currently utilized treatments – in 327 patients with myelofibrosis (primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis), regardless of the patients’ platelet counts. At study entry, 46 percent of patients were thrombocytopenic; 32 percent of patients had platelet counts less than 100,000 per microliter (<100,000/µL); and 16 percent of patients had platelet counts less than 50,000 per microliter (<50,000/µL); normal platelet counts range from 150,000 to 450,000 per microliter. The median duration of treatment was 16.2 months in patients treated with pacritinib, compared to 5.9 months in patients treated with BAT. The majority (79 percent) of patients on the BAT arm eventually crossed over to receive pacritinib therapy.

About Pacritinib
Pacritinib is an investigational oral kinase inhibitor with specificity for JAK2, FLT3, IRAK1 and CSF1R. In August 2014, pacritinib was granted Fast Track designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis, including but not limited to patients with disease-related thrombocytopenia, patients experiencing treatment-emergent thrombocytopenia on other JAK2 inhibitor therapy or patients who are intolerant of, or whose symptoms are sub-optimally managed on other JAK2 inhibitor therapy.

CTI BioPharma and Baxalta are parties to a worldwide license agreement to develop and commercialize pacritinib. CTI BioPharma and Baxalta will jointly commercialize pacritinib in the U.S. while Baxalta has exclusive commercialization rights for all indications outside the U.S.

The companies recently announced the initiation of a rolling new drug application (NDA) to the FDA for pacritinib. The companies are seeking accelerated approval and priority review of pacritinib for the treatment of patients with intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis with low platelet counts of less than 50,000 per microliter (<50,000/μL).

About Myelofibrosis and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelofibrosis is one of three main types of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), which are a closely related group of hematological blood cancers. The three main types of MPNs are myelofibrosis, polycethemia vera and essential thrombocythemia.1 Myelofibrosis is a serious and life-threatening chronic bone marrow disorder caused by the accumulation of malignant bone marrow cells that triggers an inflammatory response and scars the bone marrow. The replacement of bone marrow with scar tissue limits its ability to produce red blood cells, prompting the spleen and liver to take over this function. Symptoms that arise from this disease include enlargement of the spleen, anemia, extreme fatigue and pain. As the disease progresses, the body slows production of important blood cells, and within one year of diagnosis, the incidence of disease-related thrombocytopenia (very low blood platelet counts), anemia and red blood cell transfusion requirements increase significantly.

The estimated prevalence of MPNs suggest there are approximately 300,000 people living with the disease in the U.S., of which myelofibrosis accounts for approximately 18,000 patients.2 In Europe, there is a wide variation of prevalence observed across data sources. Myelofibrosis has a median age of 64 at the time of diagnosis2 and is a progressive disease with approximately 20 percent of patients eventually developing AML.3 The median survival for high-risk myelofibrosis patients is less than one and a half years, while the median survival for myelofibrosis patients overall is approximately six years.4

Study of Bortezomib Added to Revlimid® and Dexamethasone Backbone Therapy Presented at ASH

On December 5, 2015 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG) reported that the addition of bortezomib to REVLIMID (lenalidomide) and low-dose dexamethasone (RVd), the standard of myeloma therapy, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) in patients newly-diagnosed with multiple myeloma (Press release, Celgene, DEC 5, 2015, View Source [SID:1234508414]). The phase 3 study was conducted by SWOG, a publicly funded international cancer clinical trials network and presented at the 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In the 471-patient study, patients receiving RVd achieved a median PFS of 43 months compared to a median PFS of 30 months for patients who received Rd alone (HR = 0.712, 96% CI, one-sided p=0.0018 (two-sided p=0.0037)). The data also show that overall survival (OS) was improved for RVd compared to Rd. Patients who received RVd had a median OS of 75 months compared to a median 64 months for patients receiving Rd (HR=0.709, 96% CI, one-sided p=0.0125 (two-sided p=0.250)).

Grade 3 or higher adverse events by common toxicity criteria category seen in patients receiving RVd vs. Rd, respectively, were neurologic (33% vs. 11%), pain (12% vs. 4%), sensory (23% vs. 3%), and gastrointestinal (22% vs. 8%). Second primary malignancies occurred in 20 patients, including 10 (4%) on RVd and 10 (4%) on Rd.

"This study is a great example of how new combinations are building on the backbone of myeloma research with REVLIMID and low-dose dexamethasone," said Markus Renschler, M.D., Senior Vice President, Global Head of Hematology & Oncology Medical Affairs for Celgene. "The study demonstrated that adding bortezomib to standard care REVLIMID and dexamethasone improved remission rates and extended the duration of disease control."

The combination of REVLIMID, low-dose dexamethasone and bortezomib is not approved for any indication in any country.

About REVLIMID

In the United States, REVLIMID is approved in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. REVLIMID is also approved in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy in nearly 70 countries, encompassing Europe, the Americas, the Middle East and Asia, and in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients whose disease has progressed after one therapy in Australia and New Zealand.

REVLIMID is also approved in the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand and several Latin American countries, as well as Malaysia and Israel, for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities and in Europe for the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS associated with an isolated deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality when other therapeutic options are insufficient or inadequate.

In addition, REVLIMID is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) whose disease has relapsed or progressed after two prior therapies, one of which included bortezomib.

U.S. Regulatory Information for REVLIMID

REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone (dex) is indicated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM)

REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities

REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) whose disease has relapsed or progressed after two prior therapies, one of which included bortezomib

REVLIMID is not indicated and not recommended for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) outside of controlled clinical trials

REVLIMID is a registered trademark of Celgene Corporation.

Important Safety Information

WARNING: EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY, HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY, and VENOUS and ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLISM

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Do not use REVLIMID during pregnancy. Lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, caused limb abnormalities in a developmental monkey study. Thalidomide is a known human teratogen that causes severe life-threatening human birth defects. If lenalidomide is used during pregnancy, it may cause birth defects or embryo-fetal death. In females of reproductive potential, obtain 2 negative pregnancy tests before starting REVLIMID treatment. Females of reproductive potential must use 2 forms of contraception or continuously abstain from heterosexual sex during and for 4 weeks after REVLIMID treatment. To avoid embryo-fetal exposure to lenalidomide, REVLIMID is only available through a restricted distribution program, the REVLIMID REMS program (formerly known as the "RevAssist"program).

Information about the REVLIMID REMS program is available at www.celgeneriskmanagement.com or by calling the manufacturer’s toll-free number 1-888-423-5436.

Hematologic Toxicity (Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia)

REVLIMID can cause significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Eighty percent of patients with del 5q MDS had to have a dose delay/reduction during the major study. Thirty-four percent of patients had to have a second dose delay/reduction. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 80% of patients enrolled in the study. Patients on therapy for del 5q MDS should have their complete blood counts monitored weekly for the first 8 weeks of therapy and at least monthly thereafter. Patients may require dose interruption and/or reduction. Patients may require use of blood product support and/or growth factors.

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism

REVLIMID has demonstrated a significantly increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), as well as risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with MM who were treated with REVLIMID and dexamethasone therapy. Monitor for and advise patients about signs and symptoms of thromboembolism. Advise patients to seek immediate medical care if they develop symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, or arm or leg swelling. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended and the choice of regimen should be based on an assessment of the patient’s underlying risks.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Pregnancy: REVLIMID can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant female and is contraindicated in females who are pregnant. If this drug is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus

Allergic Reactions: REVLIMID is contraindicated in patients who have demonstrated hypersensitivity (e.g., angioedema, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis) to lenalidomide

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity:

REVLIMID is an analogue of thalidomide, a known human teratogen that causes life-threatening human birth defects or embryo-fetal death. An embryo-fetal development study in monkeys indicates that lenalidomide produced malformations in offspring of female monkeys who received drug during pregnancy, similar to birth defects observed in humans following exposure to thalidomide during pregnancy

Females of Reproductive Potential: Must avoid pregnancy for at least 4 weeks before beginning REVLIMID therapy, during therapy, during dose interruptions and for at least 4 weeks after completing therapy. Must commit either to abstain continuously from heterosexual sexual intercourse or to use two methods of reliable birth control beginning 4 weeks prior to initiating treatment with REVLIMID, during therapy, during dose interruptions and continuing for 4 weeks following discontinuation of REVLIMID. Must obtain 2 negative pregnancy tests prior to initiating therapy

Males: Lenalidomide is present in the semen of patients receiving the drug. Males must always use a latex or synthetic condom during any sexual contact with females of reproductive potential while taking REVLIMID and for up to 28 days after discontinuing REVLIMID, even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy. Male patients taking REVLIMID must not donate sperm
Blood Donation: Patients must not donate blood during treatment with REVLIMID and for 1 month following discontinuation of the drug because the blood might be given to a pregnant female patient whose fetus must not be exposed to REVLIMID
REVLIMID REMS Program

Because of embryo-fetal risk, REVLIMID is available only through a restricted program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) the REVLIMID REMS Program (formerly known as the "RevAssist" Program). Prescribers and pharmacies must be certified with the program and patients must sign an agreement form and comply with the requirements. Further information about the REVLIMID REMS program is available at www.celgeneriskmanagement.com or by telephone at 1-888-423-5436

Hematologic Toxicity: REVLIMID can cause significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. Advise patients to observe for bleeding or bruising, especially with use of concomitant medications that may increase risk of bleeding. MM: Patients taking REVLIMID/dex should have their complete blood counts (CBC) assessed every 7 days for the first 2 cycles, on days 1 and 15 of cycle 3, and every 28 days thereafter. MCL: Patients taking REVLIMID for MCL should have their CBCs monitored weekly for the first cycle (28 days), every 2 weeks during cycles 2-4, and then monthly thereafter. Patients may require dose interruption and/or dose reduction. MDS: See Boxed WARNINGS

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism: Venous thromboembolic events (DVT and PE) and arterial thromboses are increased in patients treated with REVLIMID. A significantly increased risk of DVT (7.4%) and PE (3.7%) occurred in patients with MM after at least one prior therapy, treated with REVLIMID/dex compared to placebo/dex (3.1% and 0.9%) in clinical trials with varying use of anticoagulant therapies. In NDMM study, in which nearly all patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis, DVT (3.6%) and PE (3.8%) were reported in the Rd continuous arm. Myocardial infarction (MI,1.7%) and stroke (CVA,2.3%) are increased in patients with MM after at least 1 prior therapy who were treated with REVLIMID/dex therapy compared with placebo/dex (0.6%, and 0.9%) in clinical trials. In NDMM study, MI (including acute) was reported (2.3%) in the Rd Continuous arm. Frequency of serious adverse reactions of CVA was (0.8%) in the Rd Continuous arm. Patients with known risk factors, including prior thrombosis, may be at greater risk and actions should be taken to try to minimize all modifiable factors (e.g. hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking). In controlled clinical trials that did not use concomitant thromboprophylaxis, 21.5% overall thrombotic events occurred in patients with refractory and relapsed MM who were treated with REVLIMID/dex compared to 8.3% thrombosis in the placebo/dex group. Median time to first thrombosis event was 2.8 months. In NDMM study, which nearly all patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis, overall frequency of thrombotic events was 17.4% in combined Rd continuous and Rd18 arms. Median time to first thrombosis event as 4.37 months. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended and regimen is based on patients underlying risks. ESAs and estrogens may further increase the risk of thrombosis and their use should be based on a benefit-risk decision. See Boxed WARNINGS

Increased Mortality in Patients With CLL: In a clinical trial in the first line treatment of patients with CLL, single agent REVLIMID therapy increased the risk of death as compared to single agent chlorambucil. In an interim analysis, there were 34 deaths among 210 patients on the REVLIMID treatment arm compared to 18 deaths among 211 patients in the chlorambucil treatment arm, and hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.92 [95% CI: 1.08-3.41] consistent with a 92% increase in risk of death. Serious adverse cardiovascular reactions, including atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiac failure occurred more frequently in the REVLIMID treatment arm. REVLIMID is not indicated and not recommended for use in CLL outside of controlled clinical trials

Second Primary Malignancies: In clinical trials in patients with MM receiving REVLIMID, an increase of invasive second primary malignancies notably AML and MDS have been observed. The increase of AML and MDS occurred predominantly in NDMM patients receiving REVLIMID in combination with oral melphalan (5.3%) or immediately following high dose intravenous melphalan and ASCT (up to 5.2%). The frequency of AML and MDS cases in the Revlimid/dex arms was observed to be 0.4%. Cases of B-cell malignancies (including Hodgkin’s Lymphomas) were observed in clinical trials where patients received lenalidomide in the post-ASCT setting. Patients who received REVLIMID-containing therapy until disease progression did not show a higher incidence of invasive SPM than patients treated in the fixed duration REVLIMID-containing arms. Monitor patients for the development of second primary malignancies. Take into account both the potential benefit and risk of second primary malignancies when considering treatment with REVLIMID

Hepatotoxicity: Hepatic failure, including fatal cases, has occurred in patients treated with lenalidomide in combination with dex. The mechanism of drug-induced hepatotoxicity is unknown. Pre-existing viral liver disease, elevated baseline liver enzymes, and concomitant medications may be risk factors. Monitor liver enzymes periodically. Stop REVLIMID upon elevation of liver enzymes.

After return to baseline values, treatment at a lower dose may be considered

Allergic Reactions: Angioedema and serious dermatologic reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been reported. These events can be fatal. Patients with a prior history of Grade 4 rash associated with thalidomide treatment should not receive REVLIMID. REVLIMID interruption or discontinuation should be considered for Grade 2-3 skin rash. REVLIMID must be discontinued for angioedema, Grade 4 rash, exfoliative or bullous rash, or if SJS or TEN is suspected and should not be resumed following discontinuation for these reactions. REVLIMID capsules contain lactose. Risk-benefit of REVLIMID treatment should be evaluated in patients with lactose intolerance

Tumor Lysis Syndrome: Fatal instances of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) have been reported during treatment with lenalidomide. The patients at risk of TLS are those with high tumor burden prior to treatment. These patients should be monitored closely and appropriate precautions taken

Tumor Flare Reaction: Tumor flare reaction (TFR) has occurred during investigational use of lenalidomide for CLL and lymphoma, and is characterized by tender lymph node swelling, low grade fever, pain and rash.

Monitoring and evaluation for TFR is recommended in patients with MCL. Tumor flare may mimic the progression of disease (PD). In patients with Grade 3 or 4 TFR, it is recommended to withhold treatment with lenalidomide until TFR resolves to ≤ Grade 1. In the MCL trial, approximately 10% of subjects experienced TFR; all reports were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. All of the events occurred in cycle 1 and one patient developed TFR again in cycle 11. Lenalidomide may be continued in patients with Grade 1 and 2 TFR without interruption or modification, at the physician’s discretion. Patients with Grade 1 or 2 TFR may also be treated with corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or narcotic analgesics for management of TFR symptoms. Patients with Grade 3 or 4 TFR may be treated for management of symptoms per the guidance for treatment of Grade 1 and 2 TFR

Impaired Stem Cell Mobilization: A decrease in the number of CD34+ cells collected after treatment ( > 4 cycles) with REVLIMID has been reported. In patients who are autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) candidates, referral to a transplant center should occur early in treatment to optimize timing of the stem cell collection.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Multiple Myeloma

In newly diagnosed patients the most frequently reported Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions in Arm Rd Continuous included neutropenia (27.8%), anemia (18.2%), thrombocytopenia (8.3%), pneumonia (11.1%), asthenia (7.7.%), fatigue (7.3%), back pain (7%), hypokalemia (6.6%), rash (7.3%), cataract (5.8%), dyspnea (5.6%), DVT (5.5%), hyperglycemia (5.3%), lymphopenia and leukopenia. The frequency of infections in Arm Rd Continuous was 75%

Adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of NDMM patients in Arm Rd Continuous: diarrhea (45.5%), anemia (43.8%), neutropenia (35%), fatigue (32.5%), back pain (32%), insomnia (27.6%), asthenia (28.2%), rash (26.1%), decreased appetite (23.1%), cough (22.7%), pyrexia (21.4%), muscle spasms (20.5%), and abdominal pain (20.5%). The frequency of onset of cataracts increased over time with 0.7% during the first 6 months and up to 9.6% by the second year of treatment with Arm Rd
Continuous

After at least one prior therapy most adverse reactions and Grade 3/4 adverse reactions were more frequent in MM patients who received the combination of REVLIMID/dex compared to placebo/dex. Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions included neutropenia 33.4% vs 3.4%, febrile neutropenia 2.3% vs 0%, DVT 8.2% vs 3.4% and PE 4% vs 0.9% respectively
Adverse reactions reported in ≥15% of MM patients (REVLIMID/dex vs dex/placebo): fatigue (44% vs 42%), neutropenia (42% vs 6%), constipation (41% vs 21%), diarrhea (39% vs 27%), muscle cramp (33% vs 21%), anemia (31% vs 24%), pyrexia (28% vs 23%), peripheral edema (26% vs 21%), nausea (26% vs 21%), back pain (26% vs 19%), upper respiratory tract infection (25% vs 16%), dyspnea (24% vs 17%), dizziness (23% vs 17%), thrombocytopenia (22% vs 11%), rash (21% vs 9%), tremor (21% vs 7%), weight decreased (20% vs 15%), nasopharyngitis (18% vs 9%), blurred vision (17% vs 11%), anorexia (16% vs 10%), and dysgeusia (15% vs 10%)

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in ≥ 5% of patients with del 5q MDS were neutropenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (50%), pneumonia (7%), rash (7%), anemia (6%), leukopenia (5%), fatigue (5%), dyspnea (5%), and back pain (5%)
Adverse events reported in ≥15% of del 5q MDS patients (REVLIMID): thrombocytopenia (61.5%), neutropenia (58.8%), diarrhea (49%), pruritus (42%), rash (36%), fatigue (31%), constipation (24%), nausea (24%), nasopharyngitis (23%), arthralgia (22%), pyrexia (21%), back pain (21%), peripheral edema (20%), cough (20%), dizziness (20%), headache (20%), muscle cramp (18%), dyspnea (17%), pharyngitis (16%), epistaxis (15%), asthenia (15%), upper respiratory tract infection (15%)

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in ≥5% of patients treated with REVLIMID in the MCL trial (N=134) included neutropenia (43%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (11%), pneumonia (9%), leukopenia (7%), fatigue (7%), diarrhea (6%), dyspnea (6%), and febrile neutropenia (6%)

Serious adverse events reported in ≥2 patients treated with REVLIMID monotherapy for MCL included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clostridium difficile colitis, sepsis, basal cell carcinoma, and supraventricular tachycardia
Adverse events reported in ≥15% of patients treated with REVLIMID in the MCL trial included neutropenia (49%), thrombocytopenia (36%), fatigue (34%), anemia (31%), diarrhea (31%), nausea (30%), cough (28%), pyrexia (23%), rash (22%), dyspnea (18%), pruritus (17%), peripheral edema (16%), constipation (16%), and leukopenia (15%)

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Periodic monitoring of digoxin plasma levels, in accordance with clinical judgment and based on standard clinical practice in patients receiving this medication, is recommended during administration of REVLIMID. It is not known whether there is an interaction between dex and warfarin. Close monitoring of PT and INR is recommended in MM patients taking concomitant warfarin. Erythropoietic agents, or other agents, that may increase the risk of thrombosis, such as estrogen containing therapies, should be used with caution after making a benefit-risk assessment in patients receiving REVLIMID

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy: If pregnancy does occur during treatment, immediately discontinue the drug. Under these conditions, refer patient to an obstetrician/gynecologist experienced in reproductive toxicity for further evaluation and counseling. Any suspected fetal exposure to REVLIMID must be reported to the FDA via the MedWatch program at 1-800-332-1088 and also to Celgene Corporation at 1-888-423-5436

Nursing Mothers: It is not known whether REVLIMID is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for adverse reactions in nursing infants, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother

Pediatric Use: Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 have not been established

Renal Impairment: Since REVLIMID is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney, adjustments to the starting dose of REVLIMID are recommended to provide appropriate drug exposure in patients with moderate (CLcr 30-60 mL/min) or severe renal impairment (CLcr < 30 mL/min) and in patients on dialysis

Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information, including Boxed WARNINGS.

About SWOG is a publicly funded worldwide network of researchers that design and conduct cancer clinical trials. The group’s goal is to change medical practice so it improves the lives of people with cancer. SWOG trials test new ways to diagnose, treat, and prevent cancer. SWOG researchers also study ways to improve the care cancer patients receive, and improve quality of life for both patients and survivors. The approximately 6,000 physician-researchers in the network practice at more than 950 institutions nationwide, including 32 NCI-designated cancer centers, as well as cancer centers in six other countries. Formerly the Southwest Oncology Group, SWOG is part of the NCI’s National Clinical Trials Network and is supported primarily through NCI research funding. The group is headquartered at the Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon, has an operations office in San Antonio, Texas, and has a statistical center in Seattle, Washington. Learn more at swog.org.