CEL-SCI EXPANDS ITS PHASE I STUDY FOR TREATMENT OF ANAL WARTS IN HIV/HPV CO-INFECTED PATIENTS WITH ADDITION OF 2ND SITE AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

On July 20, 2015 CEL-SCI reported that it has added a second clinical site for its Phase I clinical trial evaluating peri-anal wart immunotherapy in HIV/HPV co-infected men and women with its investigational cancer immunotherapy Multikine* (Leukocyte Interleukin, Injection) (Press release, Cel-Sci, JUL 20, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506530]). Dr. Joel Palefsky, world renowned scientist and Key Opinion Leader (KOL) in human papilloma virus (HPV) research and the prevention of anal cancer, has joined the study as a Principal Investigator at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). UCSF becomes the second clinical site for the study. The first site, the U.S. Naval Medical Center San Diego, continues to enroll patients under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Dr. Joel Palefsky is the Chair of the HPV Working Group of the AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC) and is the head of the AMC HPV Virology Core Lab at UCSF. The AMC is a U.S. National Cancer Institute-supported clinical trials group founded in 1995 to support innovative trials for AIDS-related cancers. The AMC is composed of over 37 clinical trials sites worldwide, five Working Groups, an Administrative Office, a Statistical Office, and an Operations and Data Management Office. Collectively, these components develop and oversee the scientific agenda, manage the groups’ portfolio of clinical trials and other scientific-based studies, and help to develop new protocols. Dr. Palefsky has extensive experience in the biology of HPV infection, HPV infection in HIV-positive men and women, HPV vaccines and in the design and implementation of multiple clinical research trials of HPV-related disease.

Having published over 280 papers, Dr. Palefsky is Principal Investigator of the ANCHOR study, an $89 million NIH-funded study of the efficacy of secondary prevention of anal cancer. He is also the Principal Investigator on several laboratory-based and clinical research studies of HPV-associated neoplasia, particularly in the setting of HIV infection. He also specializes in the molecular biology and development of new treatments for HPV. Dr. Palefsky is the founder and immediate past president of the International Anal Neoplasia Society and is currently president of the International Human Papillomavirus Society. He is actively involved in training students in clinical and translational research. Dr. Palefsky has led the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF) program at UCSF since its inception in 2001 and has been the leader of the Clinical Translational Science Awards (CTSA) TL1 program at UCSF since its inception in 2006.

"We are very pleased to welcome Dr. Palefsky as a Principal Investigator for our Phase I study and we believe his interest in Multikine is a very important testament of our immunotherapy’s potential in the treatment of HPV related diseases in HIV infected patients," stated CEL-SCI Chief Executive Officer Geert Kersten. "Dr. Palefsky is widely recognized as one of the world’s top researchers in the field HPV infection in HIV co-infected patients. With his participation through UCSF we anticipate rapid patient enrollment in our Phase I study."

Anal and genital warts are commonly associated with HPV, the most common sexually transmitted disease. The U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has named HPV the 4th largest health threat the U.S. will face in 2014. According to the CDC, 360,000 people in the U.S. get genital warts each year. Persistent HPV infection in the anal region is thought to be responsible for up to 80% of anal cancers. HPV is an even more significant health problem in the HIV infected population as individuals are living longer as a result of greatly improved HIV medications, but have difficulty clearing HPV due to their compromised immune system.

About Multikine for HIV/HPV Co-infected Patients

Multikine is being given to HIV/HPV co-infected patients with peri-anal warts based on the results obtained in a Multikine Phase I study conducted at the University of Maryland in which the investigational immunotherapy Multikine was given to HIV/HPV co-infected women with cervical dysplasia. In these patients, visual and histological evidence of clearance of lesions was observed. Elimination of a number of HPV strains was also determined by in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed on tissue biopsy collected before and after Multikine treatment. The study investigators reported that the study volunteers in this study all appeared to tolerate the Multikine treatment with no reported serious adverse events. The treatment regimen utilized in the Multikine cervical study in HIV/HPV co-infected patient volunteers is identical to the regimen being administered in the current Phase I study of HIV/HPV co-infected patient volunteers with peri-anal warts that is in progress at the U.S. Naval Medical Center San Diego and the University of California San Francisco.

About Multikine

Multikine (Leukocyte Interleukin, Injection) is an investigational immunotherapeutic agent that is being tested in an open-label, randomized, controlled, global pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial as a potential first-line treatment for advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Multikine is designed to be a different type of therapy in the fight against cancer: one that appears to have the potential to work with the body’s natural immune system in the fight against tumors.

Multikine is also being tested in a Phase 1 study under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement ("CRADA") with the U.S. Naval Medical Center, San Diego, as a potential treatment for peri-anal warts in HIV/HPV co-infected men and women. CEL-SCI has also entered into two co-development agreements with Ergomed Clinical Research Limited to further the development of Multikine for cervical dysplasia/neoplasia in women who are co-infected with HIV and HPV and for peri-anal warts in men and women who are co-infected with HIV and HPV.

Radius Health Announced That it Has Appointed Debasish Roychowdhury, MD, to Its Board of Directors and the Formation of the Radius Oncology Clinical Advisory Board (OCAB)

On July 20, 2015 Radius reported that Debasish Roychowdhury, M.D., who previously served as Seragon’s Acting Chief Medical Officer, has been elected to the company’s Board of Directors. Dr. Roychowdhury is a leader in the pharmaceutical industry with a strong background in oncology research and development, and regulatory and commercial operations, having previously served in key senior leadership roles at Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline and Eli Lilly (Press release, Radius, JUL 20, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506529]). Debasish played a key role in the development and advancement of Seragon’s selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) platform for breast cancer and other hormone-driven cancers.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Radius Health also announced today that it has formed an Oncology Clinical Advisory Board (OCAB) comprised initially of two renowned leaders in the field of oncology: Professor Mitch Dowsett, FMedSci, PhD, and Professor George W. Sledge Jr.

"We are delighted to have attracted someone with Debasish’s experience and leadership in the field of oncology to join our Board of Directors. In addition, we are honored to have the esteemed counsel of two of the leading authorities in the field of breast cancer research, Professor Dowsett and Professor Sledge, join our newly formed OCAB," said Radius Health CEO, Robert E. Ward. "We are excited about the value these accomplished individuals are expected to bring to Radius as we seek to accelerate the development of RAD1901 in breast cancer."

Debasish has a distinguished track record in the field of oncology having been involved in the approval of nine oncology drugs, including Almita, Tykerb and Jevtana. Currently, he is President of Nirvan Consultants, LLC and in this capacity he serves in senior advisory roles for biotechnology companies to help advance their pipeline of therapeutics. Debasish also serves as a member of the Board of Directors for Lytix Biopharma AS.

Prior to the acquisition of Seragon by Roche, Debasish was one of the founding members of the Seragon Clinical and Scientific Advisory Board and served as Seragon’s Acting Chief Medical Officer. Previously, Debasish was the Senior Vice President of Global Oncology and Head of the Global Oncology Division at Sanofi until November 2013. Prior to that, he served as the Vice President for Clinical Development at GlaxoSmithKline and directed the oncology global regulatory group at Eli Lilly and Company. In his academic career, Debasish served as a faculty member at the University of Cincinnati. He trained at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences and University of California, San Francisco.

Oncology Clinical Advisory Board (OCAB)

Radius is pleased to announce the formation of the OCAB with its first two members, both of whom are world renowned scientific and clinical authorities in the field of oncology: Professor Mitch Dowsett, and Professor George Sledge.

Professor Mitch Dowsett, FMedSci, PhD, is Head of the Academic Department of Biochemistry and Head of the Centre for Molecular Pathology at the Royal Marsden Hospital in London, UK. He is also Professor of Biochemical Endocrinology at the Institute of Cancer Research, Professor of Translational Research in the Breakthrough Breast Cancer Centre, Team Leader for Breast Cancer Research for the Biomedical Research Centre for Cancer and Leader of the Endocrinology Team at the Breakthrough Breast Cancer Centre. Dr. Dowsett’s main scientific interests have been related to the endocrine basis of the majority of breast cancers, and his studies to understand the mechanisms of response and resistance to estrogen deprivation in the treatment of breast cancer. His studies led to the development of aromatase inhibitors.

Dr. Sledge is Professor and Chief of Medical Oncology at Stanford University Medical Center, and specializes in the study and treatment of breast cancer. Dr. Sledge directed the first large, nationwide study on the use of paclitaxel to treat advanced breast cancer. His recent research focuses on novel biologic treatments for breast cancer. He has published over 300 articles in medical journals about breast cancer and chaired several clinical trials involving new breast cancer treatments. Dr. Sledge serves as Editor-in-Chief of the journal Clinical Breast Cancer and is past President of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper). He served as Chairman of the Breast Committee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group from 2002 to 2009 where he played an important role in the development of several nationwide clinical trials. He has also served as Chair of ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)’s Education Committee, member of the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program’s Integration Panel, member of the Food and Drug Administration’s Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) and is currently a member of the External Advisory Committee for the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project.

About the Investigational Drug RAD1901

Radius is developing the investigational drug RAD1901 as a potential treatment for estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. The drug also has potential as a treatment for other ER+ cancers, such as ovarian or endometrial cancer. The National Cancer Institute estimates that approximately 70% of breast cancers are ER+ and may grow in response to exposure to estrogen. Endocrine therapy is intended to block the estrogen signal or reduce the production of estrogen. More information about breast cancer and endocrine therapy may be found on the National Cancer Institute website View Source

RAD1901 is an investigational, non-steroidal small molecule that is designed to selectively bind and degrade the estrogen receptor. RAD1901 has demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity in xenograft models of ER+ breast cancer in preclinical testing and complete suppression of the FES-PET signal after six days of dosing in a maximum tolerated dose clinical study. In preclinical models thus far, RAD1901 has shown good tissue selectivity, does not appear to stimulate the uterine endometrium, and appears to protect against bone loss in an ovariectomy-induced osteopenia rat model. In addition, we believe that RAD1901 also has the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Radius recently reported preclinical activity of RAD1901 in combination with either mTOR or CDK inhibitors, the results demonstrated potent tumor shrinkage in a patient-derived tumor explant animal model.

Radius has begun a Phase 1 multicenter, open-label, two-part, dose-escalation study of the investigational drug RAD1901 in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. The study is designed to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose of RAD1901, and includes a preliminary evaluation of the potential anti-tumor effects. The incidence of dose limiting toxicities will be assessed during the first 28 days. Tumor response will be evaluated in patients with measurable or evaluable disease, using RECISTv1.1 guidelines every 8 weeks until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 months of treatment. Plasma concentrations of RAD1901 will be assessed every 28 days for up to 12 months of treatment. The details of the Phase 1 study of RAD1901 are posted on www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Radius is also developing RAD1901 at lower doses as a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator for the potential treatment of vasomotor symptoms. Historically, hormone replacement therapy ("HRT") with estrogen or progesterone was considered the most efficacious approach to relieving menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes. However, because of the concerns about the potential long‑term risks and contraindications associated with HRT, Radius believes a significant need exists for new therapeutic treatment options to treat vasomotor symptoms. In a Phase 2 proof of concept study, RAD1901 at lower doses demonstrated a reduction in the frequency and severity of moderate and severe hot flashes. Radius intends to commence a Phase 2b trial in vasomotor symptoms in the second half of 2015.

European Commission Approves Nivolumab BMS, the First PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Europe Proven to Extend Survival for Patients with Previously-Treated Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

On July 20, 2015 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) reported that the European Commission has approved Nivolumab BMS for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic squamous (SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior chemotherapy (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, JUL 20, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506547]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

This approval marks the first major treatment advance in SQ NSCLC in more than a decade in the European Union (EU). Nivolumab is also the first and only PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to demonstrate overall survival (OS) in previously-treated metastatic SQ NSCLC. This approval allows for the marketing of nivolumab in all 28 Member States of the EU.

"With the EU approval of nivolumab, patients in Europe have for the first time in more than ten years access to an entirely new treatment modality for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer, which has the potential to replace the current standard of care," said Emmanuel Blin, senior vice president, Head of Commercialization, Policy and Operations, Bristol-Myers Squibb. "Bristol-Myers Squibb is passionate about changing survival expectations and the way patients live with advanced cancers, and is committed to continually deliver, with speed and urgency, new approaches to pursue this goal."

Approval is based on the results of CheckMate -017 and -063. In the Phase III CheckMate -017 study, nivolumab demonstrated superior clinical benefit across all endpoints versus docetaxel, the standard of care, regardless of PD-L1 (programmed death ligand-1) expression status, including a 41% reduction in the risk of death, significantly superior OS rate of 42% versus 24% for docetaxel at one-year and superior durable antitumor activity. In the Phase II CheckMate -063 study, nivolumab showed an estimated 41% one-year survival rate and a median OS of 8.2 months. The safety profile of nivolumab is consistent with previously-reported trials, and in Checkmate -017, is also favorable compared to docetaxel.

"Today’s approval of nivolumab for squamous non-small cell lung cancer is truly a major advance for patients fighting this devastating disease, and the providers that treat them," said Rolf Stahel, M.D., president of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) and Professor at University Hospital Zurich. "Nivolumab has shown statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy versus standard of care in this patient population. This approval reinforces the science behind Immuno-Oncology including our understanding of the role of PD-L1 expression."

In Europe, incidence and mortality rates for lung cancer are on the rise, currently accounting for 20% of all cancer deaths. NSCLC is one of the most common types of the disease and accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases. SQ NSCLC accounts for approximately 25% to 30% of all lung cancers. For patients with NSCLC, whose disease reoccurs or progresses despite chemotherapy, the treatment options are limited and the prognosis is poor, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 2%, globally.

About CheckMate -017, -063

The European Commission’s approval is based on data from two studies (Phase III CheckMate -017 and Phase II CheckMate -063). Together, the trials investigated nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg every two weeks, which has been well-established across the Phase III nivolumab clinical development program for various tumors.

CheckMate -017 is a landmark Phase III, open-label, randomized clinical trial that evaluated nivolumab 3mg/kg intravenously over 60 minutes every two weeks versus standard of care, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously administered every three weeks in patients with advanced SQ NSCLC who had progressed during or after one prior platinum doublet-based chemotherapy regimen. The study’s primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). The trial included patients regardless of their PD-L1 expression status.

Results from CheckMate -017 showed a 41% reduction in the risk of death with a one-year survival rate of 42% for nivolumab (42.1% [95% CI: 33.7, 50.3]) versus 24% (23.7% [95% CI: 16.9, 31.1]) for docetaxel (HR 0.59, 96.8% CI: 0.43, 0.81; p=0.0002). Median OS was 9.2 months versus 6 months for nivolumab and docetaxel, respectively. Nivolumab also demonstrated consistent, statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across secondary endpoints, ORR and PFS, versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced SQ NSCLC. Survival benefit was observed independent of PD-L1 expression across all pre-specified expression levels (1%, 5% and 10%).

The safety profile of nivolumab in CheckMate -017 was consistent with prior studies and favorable versus docetaxel. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred less frequently with nivolumab (any grade, 58%; grade 3-4, 6.9%; no grade 5 events) than docetaxel (any grade, 86%; grade 3-5, 55%; grade 5, 2.3%), including both hematology and non-hematology toxicities. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 3.1% of patients in the nivolumab arm compared to 10.1% for docetaxel. Pneumonitis (1.5%) was the most common treatment-related AE leading to discontinuation in the nivolumab arm and peripheral neuropathy (3.1%) for the docetaxel arm.

Findings from CheckMate -017 were recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and presented during an oral abstract session at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in May 2015.

CheckMate -063 is a Phase II, single-arm, open-label trial that included patients with metastatic SQ NSCLC who had progressed after two or more lines of therapy. In this trial, the confirmed objective response rate by an independent radiology review committee, the study’s primary endpoint, was 14.5% (95% CI: 8.47, 22.2) with an estimated one-year survival rate of 41% and median OS of 8.21 months (95% CI: 6.05, 10.9). The safety profile of nivolumab in CheckMate -063 was consistent with prior clinical studies and managed using established treatment algorithms.

About Nivolumab

Bristol-Myers Squibb submitted two separate Marketing Authorization Applications, one in advanced melanoma under the tradename Opdivo and one for SQ NSCLC under the Nivolumab BMS tradename in order to accelerate availability of nivolumab for health care professionals in both indications. The goal is to have these two marketing authorizations "reconciled" into a single marketing authorization, under the Opdivo brand name toward the end 2015.

Bristol-Myers Squibb has a broad, global development program with over 8,000 patients enrolled in more than 50 trials evaluating nivolumab across multiple tumor types – as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies.

Nivolumab is the first PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive regulatory approval on July 4, 2014 when Ono Pharmaceutical Co. announced that it received manufacturing and marketing approval in Japan for the treatment of patients with unresectable melanoma. On December 22, 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted its first approval for nivolumab for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma and disease progression following Yervoy (ipilimumab) and, if BRAF V600 mutation positive, a BRAF inhibitor. On March 4, 2015, nivolumab received its second FDA approval for the treatment of patients with metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. The European Commission announced approval of nivolumab on June 19, 2015, for the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma in adults, regardless of BRAF status.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

Severe pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease, including fatal cases, occurred with OPDIVO treatment. Across the clinical trial experience in 691 patients with solid tumors, fatal immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 0.7% (5/691) of patients receiving OPDIVO; no cases occurred in Trial 1 or Trial 3. In Trial 1, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 3.4% (9/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO and none of the 102 patients receiving chemotherapy. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 2.2% (6/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO; one with Grade 3 and five with Grade 2. In Trial 3, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 6% (7/117) of patients receiving OPDIVO, including, five Grade 3 and two Grade 2 cases. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue OPDIVO for Grade 3 or 4 and withhold OPDIVO until resolution for Grade 2.

Immune-Mediated Colitis

In Trial 1, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 21% (57/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 18% (18/102) of patients receiving chemotherapy. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.2% (6/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO; five with Grade 3 and one with Grade 2. In Trial 3, diarrhea occurred in 21% (24/117) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 3 immune-mediated colitis occurred in 0.9% (1/117) of patients. Monitor patients for immune-mediated colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 (of more than 5 days duration), 3, or 4 colitis. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 or 3. Permanently discontinue OPDIVO for Grade 4 colitis or recurrent colitis upon restarting OPDIVO.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

In Trial 1, there was an increased incidence of liver test abnormalities in the OPDIVO-treated group as compared to the chemotherapy-treated group, with increases in AST (28% vs 12%), alkaline phosphatase (22% vs 13%), ALT (16% vs 5%), and total bilirubin (9% vs 0). Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.1% (3/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO; two with Grade 3 and one with Grade 2. In Trial 3, the incidences of increased liver test values were AST (16%), alkaline phosphatase (14%), ALT (12%), and total bilirubin (2.7%). Monitor patients for abnormal liver tests prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater transaminase elevations. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for Grade 3 or 4 immune-mediated hepatitis.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

In Trial 1, there was an increased incidence of elevated creatinine in the OPDIVO-treated group as compared to the chemotherapy-treated group (13% vs 9%). Grade 2 or 3 immune-mediated nephritis or renal dysfunction occurred in 0.7% (2/268) of patients. In Trial 3, the incidence of elevated creatinine was 22%. Immune-mediated renal dysfunction (Grade 2) occurred in 0.9% (1/117) of patients. Monitor patients for elevated serum creatinine prior to and periodically during treatment. For Grade 2 or 3 serum creatinine elevation, withhold OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids; if worsening or no improvement occurs, permanently discontinue OPDIVO. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 4 serum creatinine elevation and permanently discontinue OPDIVO.

Immune-Mediated Hypothyroidism and Hyperthyroidism

In Trial 1, Grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 8% (21/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO and none of the 102 patients receiving chemotherapy. Grade 1 or 2 hyperthyroidism occurred in 3% (8/268) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 1% (1/102) of patients receiving chemotherapy. In Trial 3, hypothyroidism occurred in 4.3% (5/117) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 1.7% (2/117) of patients, including one Grade 2 case. Monitor thyroid function prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer hormone replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. Initiate medical management for control of hyperthyroidism.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

In Trial 1 and 3 (n=385), the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in <2% of OPDIVO-treated patients: adrenal insufficiency, uveitis, pancreatitis, facial and abducens nerve paresis, demyeliniation, autoimmune neuropathy, motor dysfunction, and vasculitis. Across clinical trials of OPDIVO administered at doses 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, additional clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions were identified: hypophysitis, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypopituitarism, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and myasthenic syndrome. Based on the severity of adverse reaction, withhold OPDIVO, administer high-dose corticosteroids, and, if appropriate, initiate hormone- replacement therapy.

Embryofetal Toxicity

Based on its mechanism of action, OPDIVO can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with OPDIVO and for at least 5 months after the last dose of OPDIVO.

Lactation

It is not known whether OPDIVO is present in human milk. Because many drugs, including antibodies, are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from OPDIVO, advise women to discontinue breastfeeding during treatment.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Trial 1, serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 42% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions reported in 2% to <5% of patients receiving OPDIVO were abdominal pain, hyponatremia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased lipase.
In Trial 3, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent serious adverse drug reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were dyspnea, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, pneumonitis, hypercalcemia, pleural effusion, hemoptysis, and pain.

Common Adverse Reactions

The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO in Trial 1 were rash (21%) and in Trial 3 were fatigue (50%), dyspnea (38%), musculoskeletal pain (36%), decreased appetite (35%), cough (32%), nausea (29%), and constipation (24%).
Please see U.S. Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO.

Study shows promise of precision medicine for most common type of lymphoma

On July 20, 2015 NIH reported that a clinical trial has shown that patients with a specific molecular subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are more likely to respond to the drug ibrutinib (Imbruvica) than patients with another molecular subtype of the disease (Press release, NIH, JUL 20, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506540]). The study appeared online July 20, 2015, in Nature Medicine.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In this phase II trial, patients with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of DLBCL were more likely to respond to ibrutinib than patients with the germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype of DLBCL. The trial was jointly conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), which is part of the National Institutes of Health, and Pharmacyclics, Sunnyvale, California.

Lymphomas are caused by an abnormal proliferation of white blood cells and can occur at any age. DLBCL is an aggressive form of lymphoma that grows rapidly but is potentially curable. The disease accounts for approximately 30 percent of newly diagnosed lymphomas in the United States.

Several years ago, NCI scientists identified the two primary subtypes of DLBCL based on characteristic patterns of gene activity within the lymphoma cells. The discovery of these subtypes suggested to the researchers that targeted treatments could be developed for each subtype.

Building on this work, the trial enrolled 80 patients with DLBCL that had relapsed or had not responded to prior treatment. All patients received ibrutinib. Tumor responses were seen in 25 percent of patients overall, including eight patients with complete responses and 12 with partial responses.

For the study population as a whole, after a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the median progression-free survival (the time until the disease worsened) and overall survival were 1.6 months and 6.4 months, respectively.

An analysis based on disease subtype showed that ibrutinib produced complete or partial responses in 37 percent (14 of 38) of patients with ABC DLBCL but only 5 percent (1 of 20) of patients with GCB DLBCL. Based on these results, the researchers concluded that, for future clinical trials involving ibrutinib, the ABC DLBCL gene signature could be used to identify patients who would be more likely to respond to the drug.

DLBCL originates from B cells, which play a crucial role in the body’s immune response. The target for ibrutinib, an enzyme called Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), is a key component of B-cell receptor signaling. The new study provides the first clinical evidence that ABC but not GBC tumors may produce abnormal B-cell receptor signals that promote the survival of cancer cells by activating BTK, thereby accounting for the sensitivity of ABC tumors to ibrutinib.

"Clinical trials such as this are critical for translating basic molecular findings into effective therapies," said Louis Staudt, M.D., Ph.D., NCI Center for Cancer Genomics, who co-led the study and discovered the role of B-cell receptor signaling in ABC DLBCL. Study co-leader Wyndham Wilson, M.D., Ph.D., NCI Center for Cancer Research, added, "This is the first clinical study to demonstrate the importance of precision medicine in lymphomas."

Based on this study’s results, an international phase III trial of standard chemotherapy with or without ibrutinib in patients with DLBCL, excluding the GCB subtype, is being conducted by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, New Jersey, in collaboration with Drs. Wilson and Staudt. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01855750. This is the first time a phase III trial has been designed to selectively enroll patients with a particular molecular subtype of DLBCL. The study’s objective is to determine if the addition of ibrutinib to standard chemotherapy can increase the cure rate of patients with ABC DLBCL.

Ibrutinib has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of certain patients with several other cancers, including mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

Heron Therapeutics Resubmits SUSTOL® New Drug Application to FDA

On July 20, 2015 Heron Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:HRTX), a biotechnology company focused on improving the lives of patients by developing best-in-class medicines that address major unmet medical needs,reported that it has resubmitted its New Drug Application (NDA) for SUSTOL (granisetron) Injection, extended release, for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Press release, Heron Therapeutics, JUL 20, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2068986 [SID:1234506539]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Heron expects confirmation of acceptance from the FDA and a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date within the next few weeks. The Company anticipates a six-month review by the FDA.

The NDA filing includes data from the MAGIC study, Heron’s recently completed, multi-center, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study in patients receiving HEC agents. The MAGIC study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SUSTOL as part of a three-drug regimen with the intravenous (IV) neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist fosaprepitant and the IV/oral corticosteroid dexamethasone for the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving HEC. The MAGIC study, which was conducted entirely in the U.S. using the 2011 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) guidelines for classification of emetogenic potential, is the only Phase 3 CINV study to-date to use the currently recommended, standard-of-care, three-drug regimen for CINV prophylaxis in a HEC population as the comparator: a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, fosaprepitant and dexamethasone.

The MAGIC study’s primary endpoint was achieved. Specifically, the percentage of patients who achieved a Complete Response was significantly higher in the SUSTOL arm compared with the comparator arm (p=0.014). Significant benefit was also observed in the reduction in episodes of nausea, which has the greatest impact on patient quality of life. Data from a previous Phase 3 study of more than 1,300 patients, which was previously submitted to the FDA, demonstrated SUSTOL’s efficacy in the prevention of acute and delayed CINV associated with MEC regimens and acute CINV associated with HEC regimens.

"The rapid resubmission of the NDA for SUSTOL, the first and only 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with extended-release technology and 5-day CINV prevention in both MEC and HEC, is a major milestone for Heron Therapeutics," commented Barry D. Quart, Pharm.D., Chief Executive Officer of Heron. "We look forward to working closely with the FDA during the SUSTOL NDA review period, as we believe SUSTOL has the potential to improve the lives of patients suffering from CINV by significantly reducing both nausea and vomiting associated with MEC or HEC regimens."

About SUSTOL for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

SUSTOL (granisetron) Injection, extended release, which utilizes Heron’s proprietary Biochronomer drug delivery technology, is Heron’s novel, long-acting formulation of granisetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Granisetron, an FDA-approved 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist was selected due to its broad use by physicians based on a well-established record of safety and efficacy. SUSTOL has been shown to maintain therapeutic drug levels of granisetron for five days with a single subcutaneous injection. SUSTOL is being developed for the prevention of both acute (day 1 following the administration of chemotherapy agents) and delayed (days 2-5 following the administration of chemotherapy agents) CINV associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). While other 5-HT3 antagonists are approved for the prevention of CINV, SUSTOL is the first agent in the class to demonstrate efficacy in reducing the incidence of delayed CINV in patients receiving HEC, a major unmet medical need, in a randomized Phase 3 study.

Affecting 70-80% of patients undergoing chemotherapy, CINV is one of the most debilitating side effects of such treatments, often attributed as a leading cause of premature discontinuation of cancer treatment. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been shown to be among the most effective and preferred treatments for CINV. However, an unmet medical need exists for patients suffering from CINV during the delayed phase, which occurs on days 2-5 following the administration of chemotherapy agents. Only one 5-HT3 receptor antagonist is approved for the prevention of delayed CINV associated with MEC, and no 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are approved for prevention of delayed CINV associated with HEC.

SUSTOL was the subject of a recently completed, multi-center, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 clinical study in patients receiving HEC regimens known as MAGIC. The MAGIC study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SUSTOL as part of a three-drug regimen with the intravenous (IV) neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist fosaprepitant and the IV/oral corticosteroid dexamethasone. The MAGIC study, which was conducted entirely in the U.S. using the 2011 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) guidelines for classification of emetogenic potential, is the only Phase 3 CINV prophylaxis study in a HEC population performed to date to use the currently recommended, standard-of-care, three-drug regimen as a comparator: a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, fosaprepitant, and dexamethasone. The study’s primary endpoint was achieved. Specifically, the percentage of patients who achieved a Complete Response in the delayed phase was significantly higher in the SUSTOL arm compared with the comparator arm (p=0.014). Heron resubmitted its New Drug Application (NDA) for SUSTOL to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2015. SUSTOL is not approved by the FDA or any other regulatory authority.