Clearance of co-development and commercialization agreement with AstraZeneca and receipt by Innate Pharma of $250m initial payment

On July 7, 2015 Innate Pharma reported that the co-development and commercialization agreement with AstraZeneca on Innate Pharma’s proprietary anti-NKG2A antibody, IPH2201 (see announcement press release as of April, 24, 2015), received HSR clearance (Press release, Innate Pharma, JUL 6, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506176]). The companies will now begin to work together to accelerate and broaden the development of IPH2201, including in combination with MEDI4736, an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor developed by MedImmune.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

On June 30, 2015, Innate Pharma received the initial payment of $250 million from AstraZeneca.

Provectus Biopharmaceuticals’ Phase 1 PV-10 Data on Liver Cancer Presented at 6th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting

On July 6, 2015 Provectus Biopharmaceuticals reported that data from its phase 1 study of PV-10 for chemoablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cancer metastatic to the liver was presented on July 3, 2015 at the 6th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE 2015) in Osaka, Japan (Press release, Provectus Pharmaceuticals, JUL 6, 2015, http://www.pvct.com/pressrelease.html?article=20150706.1 [SID:1234506169]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The presenter was Dr. Sanjiv Agarwala, chief of medical oncology and hematology at St. Luke’s Cancer Center in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and professor of medicine at Temple University School of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He serves as a principal investigator of the phase 1 clinical trial that produced the data presented, and is the lead investigator for the phase 3 clinical trial of PV-10 as an investigational treatment for melanoma which recently began. The poster presentation was titled "Phase 1 Study of PV-10 for Chemoablation of Hepatocellular Cancer and Cancer Metastatic to the Liver."

Based on the data presented, the researchers concluded that preliminary efficacy in treatment of liver tumors with PV-10, a 10% solution of rose Bengal, was observed with acceptable tolerability. The study is continuing at three study centers with two expansion cohorts to further assess safety and response in HCC and other cancers metastatic to the liver.

Provectus previously reported data on clinical and nonclinical testing of intralesional PV-10 as an investigational treatment for metastatic melanoma, where it has demonstrated high rates of complete response and durable local control in injected melanoma lesions. The phase 1 study reported at APPLE 2015 was designed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of PV-10 in subjects with non-resectable HCC or cancer metastatic to the liver.

In the phase 1 study, subjects having a target lesion in the liver at least 1 cm in diameter were administered a single percutaneous intralesional injection of PV-10 into their target lesion. Plasma concentrations of PV-10 from 1 hour to 28 days after injection were measured. Radiologic assessments of the injected target lesion were performed to determine response over an initial 28-day and longer term 9-15 month follow-up interval. Serum levels of potential liver injury markers were measured, and adverse events recorded.

In the initial study cohort, six subjects received PV-10 injections in two successive escalating dose cohorts of 0.25 and 0.50 mL per cm3 lesion volume. Significant adverse events were limited to injection site and photosensitivity reactions that resolved without sequelae. All injected tumors were stable in size at 28 days, and among four of the initial six tumors that had longer-term assessment, two had partial response.

The poster is now available online at: http://www.pvct.com/publications/APPLE-2015-PV-10-LC-01.pdf.

Celsion Announces Continuing Positive Data from Its Phase 2 DIGNITY Study in Breast Cancer

On July 6, 2015 Celsion reported positive interim data from its ongoing open-label Phase 2 DIGNITY Trial of ThermoDox in recurrent chest wall (RCW) breast cancer (Press release, Celsion, JUL 6, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506166]). The trial is designed to enroll up to 20 patients at several U.S. clinical sites and is evaluating ThermoDox in combination with mild hyperthermia. Of the 17 patients enrolled and treated, 13 were eligible for evaluation of efficacy. Based on data available to date, every patient experienced a clinical benefit of their highly refractory disease within the ThermoDox treatment field, with a local response rate of 69% observed in the 13 evaluable patients, notably five complete responses (CR), four partial responses (PR) and four patients with stable disease (SD). The Company will complete enrollment in the study in the third quarter of 2015.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We have observed durable local responses in two-thirds of the patients treated using ThermoDox in three clinical trials to-date, which is significant considering the fact that these patients present with highly resistant chest wall tumors that had progressed on multiple previous therapies, including chemotherapy, radiation and hormone therapy," noted Dr. Nicholas Borys, Celsion’s senior vice president and chief medical officer. "We are aggressively pursuing opportunities to expand this program into Europe through the EURO-DIGNITY trial in which we expect to treat our first patient very soon."

These data are consistent with previously published Phase 1 data for ThermoDox plus hyperthermia in RCW breast cancer. The two similarly designed Phase 1 studies enrolled patients with highly resistant tumors found on the chest wall and who had progressed on previous therapies. Of the 29 patients treated in the two trials, 23 were eligible for evaluation of efficacy. A local response rate of 61% was reported in 14 of the 23 evaluable patients, with five complete responses and nine partial responses. A Clinical Response Rate (CR+PR+SD) was observed in 87% of the evaluable patients.

"These extremely impressive data position us to successfully pursue and take advantage of promising opportunities to accelerate the development and commercialization of ThermoDox in RCW breast cancer patients as we turn our attention to Europe and the initiation of EURO-DIGNITY, a multi-center study designed to evaluate ThermoDox’s potential to locally control chest wall lesions in earlier stage patients," stated Michael H. Tardugno, Celsion’s chairman, president and CEO. "Together, through our partnership with myTomorrows and our Early Access Program, our goal is faster commercialization and near-term revenue benefitting patients who are in dire need of more rapid access to new and better options for the treatment of this aggressive form of breast cancer."

The EURO-DIGNITY trial will evaluate ThermoDox plus hyperthermia and radiation in earlier stage breast cancer patients and is designed to support a registration filing in Europe. This study will be conducted in five countries with the support of key European investigators and with assistance from MedLogics Corporation, a hyperthermia device company based in Italy. In addition, Celsion has a license and distribution agreement with myTomorrows to implement an Early Access Program (EAP) for ThermoDox in all countries of the European Union plus Switzerland for the treatment of patients with RCW breast cancer. The Company expects to have ThermoDox available in mid-2015 for sale at commercial prices to physicians who are treating patients with limited therapeutic options. The EAP provides physicians with access to products in later stage development that demonstrate evidence of clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile and a quality manufacturing process in place.

Phase III data published in The Lancet Oncology shows a significant overall survival benefit of Giotrif® (afatinib) compared to Tarceva® (erlotinib) in patients with previously treated advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

On July 6, 2015 Boehringer Ingelheim reported The Lancet Oncology has published results from the LUX-Lung 8 trial (NCT01523587) (Press release, Boehringer Ingelheim, JUL 6, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506178]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

LUX-Lung 8 is the largest, prospective Phase III head-to-head trial directly comparing two EGFR-directed treatments. Afatinib* was tested versus erlotinib, an approved and recommended treatment in this setting according to international guidelines, in advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung progressing after treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.1 Treatment options for SCC of the lung are limited and this type of lung cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, with less than 5% of patients with advanced SCC surviving for five years or longer.2,3

While afatinib is not yet approved for use in patients with SCC, the study showed that treatment with afatinib, an irreversible ErbB Family Blocker, resulted in superior progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS, key secondary endpoint) compared to erlotinib in this patient population.1

Dr. Mehdi Shahidi, Medical Head, Solid Tumour Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim commented: "The ErbB family of receptors plays an important role in the development of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, and is a valid therapeutic target for this type of cancer. The broader and irreversible ErbB blockade of afatinib may explain the superiority shown in LUX-Lung 8 over erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor already approved in this setting. We are pleased with the publication of LUX-Lung 8 data in The Lancet Oncology and based on the improvement in overall survival with the use of afatinib, we are in the process of preparing regulatory submissions."

Previously reported data demonstrated that the LUX-Lung 8 study met its primary endpoint as afatinib significantly improved PFS compared to erlotinib.1 In addition, afatinib extended OS of patients to a median of 7.9 months compared to 6.8 months on erlotinib, reducing the risk of death by 19%.1 In an updated PFS analysis, performed at the time of the OS analysis, patients treated with afatinib had a median PFS of 2.6 months compared to 1.9 months for erlotinib.4 More patients reported an improvement in overall well-being/quality of life with afatinib compared to erlotinib and the rate of severe adverse events was similar between the two treatment arms with differences observed in the incidence of certain adverse events.1 See the online publication for full details.

Ignyta Announces Collaboration with UCSF For Clinical Trial of Entrectinib

On July 6, 2015 Ignyta reported a clinical collaboration with the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), under which UCSF will study entrectinib in a proof-of-concept clinical trial in cancer patients with metastatic melanoma that is positive for activating alterations to NTRK1/2/3 (encoding TrkA/TrkB/TrkC) or ROS1 (Press release, Ignyta, JUL 6, 2015, View Source [SID:1234506174]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are excited to collaborate with UCSF, a world-renowned academic research institution," said Jonathan Lim, M.D., Chairman and CEO of Ignyta. "The focus on melanoma in this study will complement the broader range of indications on which we are focused in our own clinical trials, and we expect the findings to accelerate our understanding of the potential role of entrectinib in treating patients with NTRK-positive and ROS1-positive cancers."

Know more, wherever you are:
Latest on Melanoma, book your free 1stOncology demo here.

Under the terms of the collaboration agreement, Ignyta will contribute $1 million toward the funding of the clinical trial, as well as per-patient fees based on enrollment of NTRK-positive or ROS1-positive patients and their participation in the trial. Ignyta will also provide UCSF with sufficient supply of entrectinib for use in the clinical trial. In addition to the safety and efficacy data from the trial, UCSF will provide Ignyta with tumor samples and genetic sequencing data for patients screened for inclusion in the trial for further genomic analysis.

The study is a multicenter, open label umbrella trial designed by UCSF to obtain proof-of-concept data in patients with metastatic melanoma that is positive for molecular alterations in specific tyrosine kinase receptors. UCSF will exclusively use entrectinib for patients enrolled in the clinical trial having activating molecular alterations to NTRK1/2/3 or ROS1.

About Entrectinib

Entrectinib is a novel, orally available, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumors that harbor activating alterations to NTRK1/2/3 (encoding TrkA/ TrkB/TrkC), ROS1 or ALK.

In June 2015, Ignyta announced interim results from two Phase 1 clinical trials of entrectinib: the ALKA-372-001 study and the STARTRK-1 study, which is the first of the "Studies of Tumor Alterations Responsive to Targeted Receptor Kinase" inhibition. Both trials were designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose, as well as preliminary anti-cancer activity, of single agent entrectinib in patients with solid tumors with the relevant molecular alterations: NTRK1 (encoding TrkA), ROS1 or ALK for ALKA-372-001 and NTRK1/2/3 (encoding TrkA/TrkB/TrkC), ROS1 or ALK for STARTRK-1.

As of the May 1, 2015 data cut-off for the presentation, the findings showed:

A total of 67 patients with a range of solid tumors had been dosed across both clinical trials;

Entrectinib was well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events. Other safety findings included:
In the ALKA-372-001 study, two Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed: fatigue and muscle weakness, each of which subsided with dose reduction. The most frequent adverse events were paresthesia, nausea, myalgia, asthenia, dysgeusia, and vomiting;

In the STARTRK-1 study, three Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed: neutropenia, which resolved with dose reduction, and two dose-limiting toxicities of reversible cognitive impairment and fatigue, both of which resolved upon study drug interruption. The most frequent adverse events were fatigue, dysgeusia, constipation, nausea, and paresthesia;

Pharmacokinetic measurements showed dose-proportional increases across the daily dosing regimens evaluated, with a half-life compatible with once-daily dosing;

The body surface area (BSA)-based recommended Phase 2 dose was determined to be 400 mg/m2 once per day (QD); both studies are continuing in order to determine a fixed daily dose regimen;

11 patients across both clinical trials met the company’s expected Phase 2 eligibility criteria, which include:
Presence of NTRK1/2/3, ROS1 or ALK fusions, as opposed to other types of molecular alterations (e.g., SNPs, amplifications, deletions);
ALK inhibitor and/or ROS1 inhibitor naïve; and
Treatment at or above the recommended Phase 2 dose of 400 mg/m2;

The response rate in the 11 patients that met these criteria across both studies was 91% (10 of 11 responses as assessed by the clinical sites), with 9 patients remaining on study treatment with durable responses of up to 16 treatment cycles. The responses included:
3 of 3 responses in patients with NTRK1/2/3 fusions, including patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer and acinic cell cancer;
5 of 6 responses, including one complete response, in patients with ROS1 fusions, all of which were in NSCLC; and
2 of 2 responses in patients with ALK fusions, including one NSCLC patient and one patient with another solid tumor.