Fight Colorectal Cancer Receives Grant from Exact Sciences to Launch Program Aimed at Reducing Patient Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening

On March 11, 2020 Fight Colorectal Cancer (Fight CRC) reported the launch of the Catalyst State-by-State Advocacy Program, with the help of an unrestricted grant from Exact Sciences (Press release, Fight CRC, MAR 11, 2020, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fight-colorectal-cancer-receives-grant-from-exact-sciences-to-launch-program-aimed-at-reducing-patient-barriers-to-colorectal-cancer-screening-301021163.html [SID1234555441]). The new initiative will provide funding and expertise to help advance legislation and policies geared toward increasing participation with colorectal cancer screening.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. in men and women combined1 even though it can be effectively prevented or detected early and treated through screening. One in three adults ages 50 to 75 are not screened as recommended according to American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines.2 Colorectal cancer is also on the rise in younger adults,3 prompting ACS to lower the recommended screening age to 45. ACS also stressed the importance of getting screened and following all positive noninvasive screening tests with a colonoscopy.4 Cost is a well-known barrier to screening and often patients don’t complete a follow-up colonoscopy because they fear a bill. According to a large study in one health system, patients who do not follow up on an abnormal test result are seven times more likely to die from colorectal cancer than those who complete the entire screening process.5

In the program’s first year, Fight CRC will award four states Catalyst grant funding and provide technical assistance to support two primary objectives:

Ensure that insurance coverage is in place for colorectal cancer screening starting at age 45, consistent with ACS guidelines.
Remove cost barriers for patients who need a follow-up colonoscopy, following a positive first-line screening test.
"Fight CRC is thrilled to launch the Catalyst State-by-State Advocacy Program and begin working at the state level to implement policy that will increase access to colorectal cancer screening. We are grateful for Exact Sciences’ commitment to supporting advocacy efforts to ensure people have timely access to screening, regardless of the test they choose," said Anjee Davis, President of Fight CRC. "It will allow us to empower a community of advocates across the country to impact meaningful policy change and ultimately bring us one step closer to a world without colorectal cancer."

Catalyst grants will help local leaders and advocates build the infrastructure and expertise needed to address these issues through policy change. Applications will be accepted from non-profit organizations (501(c)(3), 501(c)(4)), universities, and state and local coalitions. The program will be guided by an independent advisory council comprised of representatives including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) and the Prevent Cancer Foundation. The council reviews grant applications, selects recipients, and provides grant recipients with subject matter expertise. Fight CRC will award smaller Spark grants to additional organizations in other states to conduct action planning and help lay the foundation for success in future years. Fight CRC will announce the first Catalyst grant recipients in the coming weeks.

"Policy change is most effective when it’s driven by sound science. We are grateful that our partners at Exact Sciences and Fight CRC are teaming up to push for public policy changes at the state level that will increase screening rates for colorectal cancer," said Lisa Lacasse, president of ACS CAN. "We look forward to working collectively to ensure more and more Americans have access to covered colorectal cancer screening, free of any potential cost-sharing barriers, creating the opportunity to save more lives from colorectal cancer."

"Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. and the rising number of cases among those under the age of 45 is alarming," said Carolyn Aldigé, Founder and CEO, Prevent Cancer Foundation. "Because regular screenings are critical to reducing the risk of developing or dying from the disease, these Catalyst grants will go a long way toward helping states implement policy to increase access to colorectal cancer screening in accordance with appropriate screening guidelines. This is one cancer that can be stopped before it starts."

"Colorectal cancer is a pressing public health problem, despite it being one of the most preventable cancers. The Catalyst program taps into the best of all of us to get more people screened," said Kevin Conroy, chairman and CEO of Exact Sciences. "We are proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with Fight CRC to empower the grant recipients with the resources they need to remove barriers to screening."

Representatives from the inaugural grant recipients will participate in a training session as part of Fight CRC’s annual Call-on Congress, March 15-16. Grantees will share their goals and challenges and begin developing an action plan to achieve policy change in their state.

Checkpoint Therapeutics Reports Full-Year 2019 Financial Results and Recent Corporate Highlights

On March 11, 2020 Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. ("Checkpoint") (NASDAQ: CKPT), a clinical-stage, immuno-oncology biopharmaceutical company focused on the acquisition, development and commercialization of novel treatments for patients with solid tumor cancers, reported financial results and recent corporate highlights for the full-year ended December 31, 2019 (Press release, Checkpoint Therapeutics, MAR 11, 2020, View Source [SID1234555507]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

James F. Oliviero, President and Chief Executive Officer of Checkpoint, said, "Checkpoint achieved significant progress in 2019. Notably, we continued to advance the development of our lead antibody product candidate, cosibelimab, which is in an ongoing, multicenter, registration-enabling Phase 1 clinical trial intended to support a potential Biologics License Application ("BLA") submission for the initial indication of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma ("CSCC"). Importantly, earlier this year, we announced confirmation by the FDA of the registration submission pathway in CSCC based on the ongoing clinical trial, which we are pleased to report is now over one-third enrolled. We also successfully closed on gross proceeds of approximately $20 million in a November financing to extend our cash runway to support these efforts." Mr. Oliviero continued, "We believe cosibelimab, upon approval, has the potential to be a market disrupting product through both its differentiated two-fold mechanism of action and our plan to enter the market at a price point substantially lower than the class of PD-1 and PD-L1 agents available today that generate over $25 billion in annual sales."

2019 and Recent Corporate Highlights:

In March 2019, Checkpoint announced two new patent issuances by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the European Patent Office for CK-101, our third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor ("EGFR") inhibitor in Phase 1 development as a treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer ("NSCLC"). The patents cover CK-101 in the U.S. and Europe through at least August 2034, not including any potential patent term extensions.
In June 2019, Checkpoint was added to the Russell 2000 Index.
In September 2019, positive interim results for cosibelimab were presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology ("ESMO") Congress 2019 in Barcelona, Spain. The poster presentation provided updated interim efficacy and safety results from the ongoing multicenter Phase 1 clinical trial of cosibelimab, including expansion cohorts in CSCC and NSCLC. A 50% objective response rate was observed in CSCC and a 40% objective response rate was observed in NSCLC. Cosibelimab appeared to be safe and well-tolerated with a potentially favorable safety profile as compared to the currently available anti-PD-1 therapies.
In November 2019, pharmacokinetic and target occupancy modeling data for cosibelimab were presented at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) (Free SITC Whitepaper) 34th Annual Meeting. The poster, titled "Semi-mechanistic PK and target-occupancy modeling to support dose justification for anti-PD-L1 clinical candidate CK-301 (TG-1501) in oncology patients," compared pharmacokinetic and tumor target occupancy data at steady state under various dosing regimens of cosibelimab to those of three marketed anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies: atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab. The results demonstrated that cosibelimab dosed at 800 mg and 1,200 mg once every two weeks or every three weeks is expected to achieve over 99% PD-L1 target occupancy throughout the dosing interval, which is comparable to atezolizumab and durvalumab and higher than avelumab at approved doses.
Also in November 2019, Checkpoint closed on gross proceeds of approximately $19.6 million in an underwritten public offering of its common stock before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering-related expenses.
In January 2020, Checkpoint announced confirmation of the registration path for cosibelimab in metastatic CSCC. U.S. Food and Drug Administration feedback supports the plan to submit a BLA based on data from the ongoing Phase 1 trial. Approximately one-third of enrollment is complete as of year-end in the cohort of patients with metastatic CSCC.
Financial Results:

Cash Position: As of December 31, 2019, Checkpoint’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $26.1 million, compared to $22.0 million at December 31, 2018, an increase of $4.1 million.
R&D Expenses: Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $19.3 million, compared to $33.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $14.4 million. Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, included $3.2 million of non-cash stock expenses, compared to $1.8 million in stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018.
G&A Expenses: General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $7.2 million, compared to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase of $0.6 million. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, included $3.2 million of non-cash stock expenses, compared to $2.7 million in stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Net Loss: Net loss attributable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $24.7 million, or $0.70 per share, compared to a net loss of $36.4 million, or $1.27 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2018.

AskAt Review Article Presenting EP4 Antagonist’s Mechanism of Action in Cancer Immunotherapy Published in Leading Scientific Journal

On March 11, 2020 AskAt’s reported Frontiers in Immunology, an international scientific journal focusing on immunology, cancer immunity and immunotherapy, has published review article describing a mechanism of anti-tumor action of the EP4 antagonist (Press release, AskAt, MAR 11, 2020, View Source [SID1234555398]). The review is based on immuno-oncological evidence recently published in scientific journals. It suggests a new concept for the mechanism of action of the EP4 antagonist, in combination with a cancer-immunity cycle theory, demonstrating a position for the therapy within current cancer immunotherapy. This new concept helps to advance understanding of AskAt’s EP4 antagonists, AAT-007 and AAT-008, in cancer immunotherapy, and provides an immunological background of EP4 antagonist therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and tumor radiotherapy. Currently, AAT-007 and AAT-008 are being developed in the U.S. and China, initially targeting colorectal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


Transgene: Major R&D Milestones Achieved in 2019 and Strong Clinical Activity In 2020

On March 11, 2020 Transgene (Euronext Paris: TNG) (Paris:TNG), a biotech company that designs and develops virus-based immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer, reported its financial results for 2019 and provides an update on its product portfolio (Press release, Transgene, MAR 11, 2020, View Source [SID1234555425]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Philippe Archinard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Transgene, commented:

"We achieved multiple important advances with our novel myvac and Invir.IO platforms during the course of 2019. We completed all the regulatory steps required to start the US and European clinical trials of TG4050, the first individualized therapeutic vaccine based on the myvac platform in January 2020. The clinical development is being co-funded by our partner NEC.

Our collaboration with AstraZeneca, based on our Invir.IO platform, is progressing well with the first multifunctional oncolytic viruses already being delivered to them. This platform has also generated a number of exciting new oncolytic candidates, including BT-001, which is being co-developed with BioInvent. The preclinical results generated with BT-001 have been remarkable and we are working hard to make sure we can take our first multifunctional Invir.IO oncolytic into the clinic before the end of 2020.

On the clinical front, we had a year of contrasts with on the one hand, the very encouraging initial results of TG4001, which were presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2019, and on the other hand, the disappointing outcome of the Phase 2 trial of TG4010 and the decision to stop Pexa-Vec trials in HCC.

We remain confident in the potential of our four clinical assets TG4001, TG4050, TG6002 and BT-001 as well as in our highly innovative technologies and platforms myvac and Invir.IO.

We also have sufficient financial visibility to pursue our developments with determination and confidence."

2020: multiple clinical milestones expected

Transgene’s portfolio currently consists of four immunotherapy drug candidates in clinical development:

Two therapeutic vaccines: TG4001 currently being evaluated in a Phase 2 trial and TG4050, the first individualized treatment based on the myvac platform, assessed in two Phase 1 trials.
Two oncolytic viruses: TG6002, which is being assessed in two Phase 1/2a trials, and BT-001, the first oncolytic virus based on the Invir.IO platform, and which is expected to enter the clinic before the end of 2020.
Clinical results for TG4001 and TG6002 are expected in the second quarter of 2020:

The Phase 2 trial of TG4001 in combination with avelumab in HPV-positive cancers is ongoing. Patient recruitment is in line with projections and interim results are expected in the second quarter of 2020.
The Phase 1 trial of TG6002 administered intravenously in patients with gastrointestinal cancers is ongoing. First data are also expected in the second quarter of 2020.
With myvac and Invir.IO, Transgene has two next-generation platforms whose potential has been validated by collaboration deals with NEC and AstraZeneca respectively:

myvac platform

Transgene is developing the therapeutic vaccine TG4050, together with NEC. This is the first individualized vaccine based on the myvac platform. It integrates NEC’s Artificial Intelligence technologies. These technologies are used to select the most relevant mutations (neoantigens) that are integrated into the TG4050 vaccine. These AI technologies will also contribute to the in-depth analysis of the patient’s immune characteristics, in order to determine the profiles of those who responded to the vaccine.
Data validating the vaccine design principle behind TG4050 are being actively promoted and will be presented at several specialized international congresses.
The first clinical trials assessing TG4050 are ongoing in Europe and in the United States. They are including patients with ovarian cancers and head and neck cancers. NEC is financing 50% of their cost.
The clinical trials are a central part of a broad program of translational research in collaboration with expert centers both in the US and Europe. This program will generate a significant body of data evaluating the activity of TG4050 from these initial clinical trials. The first data are expected in 1H 2021.
The Company has set up an in-house good manufacturing practice (GMP) unit dedicated to the manufacturing of the individualized batches of TG4050 needed for the current Phase 1 trials.
The myvac project is supported by Bpifrance, within the NEOVIVA program. The NEOVIVA project aims to strengthen the development of this highly innovative technology together with three partners: HalioDx, Traaser and Institut Curie. €2.6 million have been allocated to Transgene over five years. The NEOVIVA project is complimentary to the collaboration between Transgene and NEC.
Invir.IO platform

BT-001 is the first oncolytic virus from the Invir.IO platform. It is based on Transgene’s patented viral vector VVcopTK-RR- which has been designed to encode BioInvent’s anti-CTLA4 antibody (an immune checkpoint inhibitor) as well as the cytokine GM-CSF.
Preclinical results with BT-001 have been extremely promising, with treatment leading to the eradication of tumors in several murine models known for their low sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. These data will be presented at scientific congresses in the coming months. A first-in-human trial is being prepared and BT-001 is expected to enter the clinic before the end of 2020.
The collaboration with AstraZeneca is highly productive with Transgene already delivering the first multi-armed oncolytic viruses to its partner. As a result, Transgene has received $10 million at the time the collaboration was signed and booked €1.3 million related to the achievement of certain preclinical milestones. In 2020, Transgene will continue to design further oncolytic viruses for this collaboration. AstraZeneca can exercise an option to further develop each of these novel drug candidates.
Transgene’s patented viral vector, which underpins the Invir.IO platform, allows the development of a wide range of multifunctional oncolytic viruses. Transgene has already designed a number of proprietary oncolytic viruses that are being evaluated in preclinical models. A candidate is expected to be selected with the aim of submitting a clinical trial application in 2H 2020 ahead of starting a clinical trial in 2021.
Summary of key ongoing clinical trials

TG4001
+ Bavencio

(avelumab)
Phase 2

Targets: HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins

HPV-positive cancers including oropharyngeal head and neck cancer – 2nd line

✓ Clinical collaboration with Merck KGaA and Pfizer, for the supply of avelumab

✓ Publication of the results of a Phase 2b trial of TG4001 in Gynecologic Oncology (April 2019), demonstrating the biological activity of this immunotherapeutic in CIN 2/3 lesions; editorial in The Lancet Oncology (April 2019)

✓ Positive results of the Phase 1b part of the trial presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) (Sept. 2019) Three of the six patients who received the recommended dose responded to the treatment. The observed responses were durable.

→ Interim Phase 2 results expected in 2Q 2020

myvac
TG4050
Phase 1

Targets: tumor neoantigens

Ovarian cancer – after first-line surgery and adjuvant therapy

✓ Trial authorized in the United States (May 2019) and in France (Sept. 2019)

✓ Principal investigator: Matthew Block (Mayo Clinic)

✓ First patient enrolled in January 2020

→ First data expected in 1H 2021

myvac
TG4050
Phase 1

HPV-negative head and neck cancer – after surgery and adjuvant therapy

✓ Trial authorized in the United Kingdom (July 2019) and in France (Sept. 2019)

✓ Principal investigator: Christian Ottensmeier (Southampton University)

✓ First patient enrolled in January 2020

→ First data expected in 1H 2021

TG6002
Phase 1/2a

Payload: FCU1 for the local production of a chemotherapy agent

Gastro-intestinal adenocarcinoma (colorectal cancer for Phase 2) – Intravenous (IV) route

✓ Publication in Molecular Therapy Oncolytics (March 2019) highlighting the promising activity of TG6002 in preclinical colorectal carcinoma models

✓ Multicenter trial ongoing in Belgium, France and Spain

✓ Last dose levels currently being evaluated (Phase 1 part)

→ First results of the Phase 1 part expected in 2Q 2020

TG6002
Phase 1/2a

Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis – Intrahepatic artery (IHA) route

✓ Multicenter trial authorized in the United Kingdom (July 2019)

✓ First patient treated in February 2020

→ First results expected in 1H 2021 (Phase 1 part)

Invir.IO
BT-001
Phase 1/2

Payload: anti-CTLA4 antibody and GM-CSF cytokine

Solid tumors

✓ Collaboration with BioInvent

✓ First clinical trial application submitted

→ Presentation of very encouraging preclinical results at upcoming scientific congresses

→ First clinical trial expected to start before the end of 2020

Key financials for 2019

Operating income of €13.7 million in 2019, compared to € 42.9 million in 2018.
R&D services for third parties amounted to €6.7 million in 2019 (€1.3 million in 2018). This significant increase is mainly due to the collaboration signed with AstraZeneca in 2019. This generated €5.3 million in revenue in 2019. The research tax credit amounted to €6.5 million in 2019 (€5.7 million euros in 2018). As a reminder, the much higher operating income figure in 2018 was mainly the result of the €35.6 million income generated by the transaction with Tasly Biopharmaceuticals Co, Ltd.
Net operating expenses of €39.2 million in 2019, compared to €35.5 million in 2018.
R&D expenses increased to €31.4 million in 2019 (from €27.3 million in 2018), due to the acceleration of external expenses for clinical projects and the setup of manufacturing unit dedicated to small clinical batches. General and administrative expenses stood at €7.1 million in 2019 versus €7.0 million in 2018.
Financial income of €6.7 million in 2019 versus a loss of €2.0 million in 2018.
The decision taken at the end of 2019 to stop the clinical development of TG4010 has led to a downward reassessment of the financial debt related to the repayable advances of the ADNA program of €8.7 million. This has been recognized as financial income.
Net loss of €18.8 million in 2019, compared to a net profit of €8.0 million in 2018.
Cash burn reduced to €20.5 million in 2019 (excluding the proceeds of the rights issue), versus €24.5 million in 2018.

Transgene received €8.9 million in June 2019, following the signing of the contract with AstraZeneca. This contributed to the reduced net cash burn compared to 2018 despite an increase in operating expenses during the period.
Cash available at year-end 2019: €43.3 million, compared to €16.9 million at the end of 2018, due to the successful €48.7 million rights issue completed in July 2019.
Transgene expects its cash burn for 2020 to be around €25 million.
The financial statements for 2019 as well as management’s discussion and analysis are attached to this press release (Appendices A and B).

The Board of Directors of Transgene met on March 11, 2020, under the chairmanship of Philippe Archinard and closed the 2019 financial statements. Audit procedures have been performed by the statutory auditors and the delivery of the auditors’ report is ongoing.

The Company’s universal registration document, which includes the annual financial report, will be available early April 2020 on Transgene’s website, www.transgene.fr.

A conference call in English is scheduled today, March 11, 2020, at 6:00 p.m. CET.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Opdivo® (nivolumab) + Yervoy® (ipilimumab) for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Previously Treated with Sorafenib

On March 11, 2020 Bristol Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) reported that Opdivo (nivolumab) 1 mg/kg plus Yervoy (ipilimumab) 3 mg/kg (injections for intravenous use) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who have been previously treated with sorafenib (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MAR 11, 2020, View Source [SID1234555402]).1,2 Approval for this indication has been granted under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response seen in the Opdivo + Yervoy cohort of the Phase 1/2 CheckMate -040 trial.1,2,3 Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.1,2

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"HCC is an aggressive disease in need of different treatment approaches,"4,5,6 said Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, M.D., lead investigator and associate professor of clinical medicine and phase I program director at the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC) and the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. "The overall response rate observed in the Opdivo + Yervoy cohort of the CheckMate -040 trial underscores the potential of this dual immunotherapy as a possible treatment option for patients."1

In the CheckMate -040 cohort of HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib, after a minimum follow up of 28 months,1 33% (16/49; 95% CI: 20-48) of patients responded to treatment with Opdivo + Yervoy; 8% (4/49) had a complete response (CR) and 24% (12/49) had a partial response (PR).1 Duration of responses (DOR) ranged from 4.6 to 30.5+ months, with 88% lasting at least six months, 56% at least 12 months and 31% at least 24 months.1 Overall response rate (ORR) and DOR were assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1).1 ORR assessed by BICR using modified RECIST was 35% (17/49; 95% CI: 22-50), with a CR reported in 12% (6/49) of patients and a PR reported in 22% (11/49) of patients.1

Opdivo is associated with the following Warnings and Precautions including immune-mediated: pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies, nephritis and renal dysfunction, skin adverse reactions, encephalitis, other adverse reactions; infusion-related reactions; embryo-fetal toxicity; and increased mortality in patients with multiple myeloma when Opdivo is added to a thalidomide analogue and dexamethasone, which is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.1 Please see the Important Safety Information section below, including Boxed WARNING for Yervoy (ipilimumab) regarding immune-mediated adverse reactions, as well as select safety information from CheckMate -040.

"The incidence of liver cancer is rising in the United States, and HCC is the most common and aggressive form of the disease,"4,5,6,7,8,9 said Andrea Wilson, president and founder, Blue Faery: The Adrienne Wilson Liver Cancer Association. "Today’s approval provides a new option for patients with HCC previously treated with sorafenib, giving the community more hope."1

Opdivo + Yervoy is the only dual immunotherapy approved by the FDA in this setting. The therapy features a potentially synergistic mechanism of action that targets two different checkpoints (PD-1 and CTLA-4) and works in complementary ways.1

"We recognize there is a critical need to provide patients with aggressive forms of cancer, like HCC, new treatment options that may offer clinically meaningful and ultimately durable responses," said Adam Lenkowsky, general manager and head, U.S., Oncology, Immunology, Cardiovascular, Bristol Myers Squibb. "Today’s announcement builds on our legacy in pioneering immunotherapy treatments and is an important step in our commitment to transforming patients’ lives through science."

Opdivo + Yervoy was granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for this indication and a Priority Review from the FDA.

*Dr. Anthony B. El-Khoueiry is a paid consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb.

About the CheckMate -040 Trial Design

CheckMate -040 (NCT01658878) is a Phase 1/2 open-label study that included a cohort of patients with HCC who progressed on or were intolerant to sorafenib and received Opdivo + Yervoy.1,10 The trial included patients who were PD-L1 expressors and non-expressors.3 Key eligibility criteria included histologic confirmation of HCC and Child-Pugh Class A cirrhosis status.1 Additional eligibility criteria included those who were infected with active HCV or active HBV, or were uninfected.1,3 Patients with active autoimmune disease, brain metastasis, a history of hepatic encephalopathy, clinically significant ascites, infection with HIV, or active co-infection with HBV and HCV or HBV and HDV were excluded.1 Patients with known fibrolamellar HCC, sarcomatoid HCC, and mixed cholangiocarcinoma and HCC were also excluded.3 A total of 49 patients were treated with Opdivo 1 mg/kg IV and Yervoy 3 mg/kg IV every three weeks for four doses, followed by Opdivo 240 mg every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.1 The major efficacy outcome was ORR, as assessed by BICR using RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST.1 Duration of response was also assessed.1

Select Safety Profile from CheckMate -040 Study

The safety of Opdivo 1 mg/kg and Yervoy 3 mg/kg was evaluated in 49 patients.1 Serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving Opdivo + Yervoy.1 Treatment was discontinued in 29% of patients and delayed in 65% of patients for an adverse reaction.1 Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥4% of patients were pyrexia, diarrhea, anemia, increased AST, adrenal insufficiency, ascites, esophageal varices hemorrhage, hyponatremia, increased blood bilirubin, and pneumonitis.1 The most common adverse reactions (reported in ≥20% of patients) were rash (53%), pruritus (53%), musculoskeletal pain (41%), diarrhea (39%), cough (37%), decreased appetite (35%), fatigue (27%), pyrexia (27%), abdominal pain (22%), headache (22%), nausea (20%), dizziness (20%), hypothyroidism (20%), and weight decreased (20%).1

Indications

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with intermediate or poor risk, previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNING: IMMUNE-MEDIATED ADVERSE REACTIONS

YERVOY can result in severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions. These immune-mediated reactions may involve any organ system; however, the most common severe immune-mediated adverse reactions are enterocolitis, hepatitis, dermatitis (including toxic epidermal necrolysis), neuropathy, and endocrinopathy. The majority of these immune-mediated reactions initially manifested during treatment; however, a minority occurred weeks to months after discontinuation of YERVOY.

Assess patients for signs and symptoms of enterocolitis, dermatitis, neuropathy, and endocrinopathy, and evaluate clinical chemistries including liver function tests (LFTs), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function tests, at baseline and before each dose.

Permanently discontinue YERVOY and initiate systemic high-dose corticosteroid therapy for severe immune-mediated reactions.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. Fatal cases have been reported. Monitor patients for signs with radiographic imaging and for symptoms of pneumonitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or more severe pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 and withhold until resolution for Grade 2. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, fatal cases of immune-mediated pneumonitis have occurred. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 6% (25/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 10% (5/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.4% (24/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 1.7% (2/119) of patients.

Immune-Mediated Colitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 (of more than 5 days duration), 3, or 4 colitis. Withhold OPDIVO monotherapy for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 or recurrent colitis upon re-initiation of OPDIVO. When administered with YERVOY, withhold OPDIVO and YERVOY for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent colitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 26% (107/407) of patients including three fatal cases. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 10% (5/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 10% (52/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 7% (8/119) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal (diarrhea of ≥7 stools above baseline, fever, ileus, peritoneal signs; Grade 3-5) immune-mediated enterocolitis occurred in 34 (7%) patients. Across all YERVOY-treated patients in that trial (n=511), 5 (1%) developed intestinal perforation, 4 (0.8%) died as a result of complications, and 26 (5%) were hospitalized for severe enterocolitis.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. Addition of an alternative immunosuppressive agent to the corticosteroid therapy, or replacement of the corticosteroid therapy, should be considered in corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis if other causes are excluded.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. Monitor patients for abnormal liver tests prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater transaminase elevations. For patients without HCC, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for Grade 3 or 4. For patients with HCC, withhold OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids if AST/ALT is within normal limits at baseline and increases to >3 and up to 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), if AST/ALT is >1 and up to 3 times ULN at baseline and increases to >5 and up to 10 times the ULN, and if AST/ALT is >3 and up to 5 times ULN at baseline and increases to >8 and up to 10 times the ULN. Permanently discontinue OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids if AST or ALT increases to >10 times the ULN or total bilirubin increases >3 times the ULN. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 13% (51/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 20% (10/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 7% (38/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 8% (10/119) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal hepatotoxicity (AST or ALT elevations >5x the ULN or total bilirubin elevations >3x the ULN; Grade 3-5) occurred in 8 (2%) patients, with fatal hepatic failure in 0.2% and hospitalization in 0.4%.

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, 1 case of fatal Guillain-Barré syndrome and 1 case of severe (Grade 3) peripheral motor neuropathy were reported.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune-mediated adrenal insufficiency, autoimmune thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis, signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency, thyroid function prior to and periodically during treatment, and hyperglycemia. Administer hormone replacement as clinically indicated and corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hypophysitis. Withhold for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hypophysitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Administer hormone-replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. Initiate medical management for control of hyperthyroidism. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hyperglycemia.

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (36/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 4% (2/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 4.6% (25/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hypophysitis occurred in 3.4% (4/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5% (21/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 18% (9/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 7% (41/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5.9% (7/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (89/407) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 8% (34/407) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (11/49) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 10% (5/49) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (119/547) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (66/547) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 15% (18/119) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (14/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, diabetes occurred in 1.5% (6/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, diabetes occurred in 2.7% (15/547) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe to life-threatening immune-mediated endocrinopathies (requiring hospitalization, urgent medical intervention, or interfering with activities of daily living; Grade 3-4) occurred in 9 (1.8%) patients. All 9 patients had hypopituitarism, and some had additional concomitant endocrinopathies such as adrenal insufficiency, hypogonadism, and hypothyroidism. Six of the 9 patients were hospitalized for severe endocrinopathies.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated nephritis. Monitor patients for elevated serum creatinine prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grades 2-4 increased serum creatinine. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 increased serum creatinine. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 2.2% (9/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 4.6% (25/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.7% (2/119) of patients.

Immune-Mediated Skin Adverse Reactions and Dermatitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), some cases with fatal outcome. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 rash. Withhold for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 rash. For symptoms or signs of SJS or TEN, withhold OPDIVO and refer the patient for specialized care for assessment and treatment; if confirmed, permanently discontinue. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 22.6% (92/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 35% (17/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 16% (90/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 14% (17/119) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal immune-mediated dermatitis (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or rash complicated by full thickness dermal ulceration, or necrotic, bullous, or hemorrhagic manifestations; Grade 3-5) occurred in 13 (2.5%) patients. 1 (0.2%) patient died as a result of toxic epidermal necrolysis. 1 additional patient required hospitalization for severe dermatitis.

Immune-Mediated Encephalitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated encephalitis. Evaluation of patients with neurologic symptoms may include, but not be limited to, consultation with a neurologist, brain MRI, and lumbar puncture. Withhold OPDIVO in patients with new-onset moderate to severe neurologic signs or symptoms and evaluate to rule out other causes. If other etiologies are ruled out, administer corticosteroids and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for immune-mediated encephalitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, encephalitis occurred in 0.2% (3/1994) of patients. Fatal limbic encephalitis occurred in one patient after 7.2 months of exposure despite discontinuation of OPDIVO and administration of corticosteroids. Encephalitis occurred in one melanoma patient receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg (0.2%) after 1.7 months of exposure. Encephalitis occurred in one RCC patient receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg (0.2%) after approximately 4 months of exposure. Encephalitis occurred in one MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patient (0.8%) receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg after 15 days of exposure.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, permanently discontinue or withhold OPDIVO, administer high-dose corticosteroids, and, if appropriate, initiate hormone-replacement therapy. Across clinical trials of OPDIVO monotherapy or in combination with YERVOY, the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in <1.0% of patients receiving OPDIVO: myocarditis, rhabdomyolysis, myositis, uveitis, iritis, pancreatitis, facial and abducens nerve paresis, demyelination, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypopituitarism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastritis, duodenitis, sarcoidosis, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), motor dysfunction, vasculitis, aplastic anemia, pericarditis, and myasthenic syndrome.

If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO and may require treatment with systemic steroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.

Infusion-Related Reactions

OPDIVO can cause severe infusion-related reactions, which have been reported in <1.0% of patients in clinical trials. Discontinue OPDIVO in patients with Grade 3 or 4 infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with Grade 1 or 2. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients. In a separate trial in which patients received OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion or a 30-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.2% (8/368) and 2.7% (10/369) of patients, respectively. Additionally, 0.5% (2/368) and 1.4% (5/369) of patients, respectively, experienced adverse reactions within 48 hours of infusion that led to dose delay, permanent discontinuation or withholding of OPDIVO. In melanoma patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.5% (10/407) of patients. In HCC patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 8% (4/49) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 5.1% (28/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 4.2% (5/119) of patients.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on mechanism of action, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with OPDIVO or YERVOY and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Increased Mortality in Patients with Multiple Myeloma when OPDIVO is Added to a Thalidomide Analogue and Dexamethasone

In clinical trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of OPDIVO to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.

Lactation

It is not known whether OPDIVO or YERVOY is present in human milk. Because many drugs, including antibodies, are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from OPDIVO or YERVOY, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment and for at least 5 months after the last dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 067, serious adverse reactions (74% and 44%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (47% and 18%) or to dosing delays (58% and 36%), and Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (72% and 51%) all occurred more frequently in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) relative to the OPDIVO arm (n=313). The most frequent (≥10%) serious adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm and the OPDIVO arm, respectively, were diarrhea (13% and 2.2%), colitis (10% and 1.9%), and pyrexia (10% and 1.0%). In Checkmate 214, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were diarrhea, pyrexia, pneumonia, pneumonitis, hypophysitis, acute kidney injury, dyspnea, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis. In Checkmate 142 in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were colitis/diarrhea, hepatic events, abdominal pain, acute kidney injury, pyrexia, and dehydration. In Checkmate 040, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=49). Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥4% of patients were pyrexia, diarrhea, anemia, increased AST, adrenal insufficiency, ascites, esophageal varices hemorrhage, hyponatremia, increased blood bilirubin, and pneumonitis.

Common Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) were fatigue (62%), diarrhea (54%), rash (53%), nausea (44%), pyrexia (40%), pruritus (39%), musculoskeletal pain (32%), vomiting (31%), decreased appetite (29%), cough (27%), headache (26%), dyspnea (24%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), arthralgia (21%), and increased transaminases (25%). In Checkmate 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO arm (n=313) were fatigue (59%), rash (40%), musculoskeletal pain (42%), diarrhea (36%), nausea (30%), cough (28%), pruritus (27%), upper respiratory tract infection (22%), decreased appetite (22%), headache (22%), constipation (21%), arthralgia (21%), and vomiting (20%). In Checkmate 214, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients treated with OPDIVO plus YERVOY (n=547) were fatigue (58%), rash (39%), diarrhea (38%), musculoskeletal pain (37%), pruritus (33%), nausea (30%), cough (28%), pyrexia (25%), arthralgia (23%), decreased appetite (21%), dyspnea (20%), and vomiting (20%). In Checkmate 142 in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were fatigue (49%), diarrhea (45%), pyrexia (36%), musculoskeletal pain (36%), abdominal pain (30%), pruritus (28%), nausea (26%), rash (25%), decreased appetite (20%), and vomiting (20%). In Checkmate 040, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY (n=49), were rash (53%), pruritus (53%), musculoskeletal pain (41%), diarrhea (39%), cough (37%), decreased appetite (35%), fatigue (27%), pyrexia (27%), abdominal pain (22%), headache (22%), nausea (20%), dizziness (20%), hypothyroidism (20%), and weight decreased (20%).

In a separate Phase 3 trial of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, the most common adverse reactions (≥5%) in patients who received YERVOY at 3 mg/kg were fatigue (41%), diarrhea (32%), pruritus (31%), rash (29%), and colitis (8%).

Please see U.S. Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO and YERVOY, including Boxed WARNING regarding immune-mediated adverse reactions for YERVOY.

Bristol Myers Squibb: Advancing Oncology Research

At Bristol Myers Squibb, patients are at the center of everything we do. The focus of our research is to increase quality, long-term survival for patients and make cure a possibility. Through a unique multidisciplinary approach powered by translational science, we harness our deep scientific experience in oncology and Immuno-Oncology (I-O) research to identify novel treatments tailored to individual patient needs. Our researchers are developing a diverse, purposefully built pipeline designed to target different immune system pathways and address the complex and specific interactions between the tumor, its microenvironment and the immune system. We source innovation internally, and in collaboration with academia, government, advocacy groups and biotechnology companies, to help make the promise of transformational medicines, like I-O, a reality for patients.

About Bristol Myers Squibb’s Patient Access Support

Bristol Myers Squibb remains committed to providing assistance so that cancer patients who need our medicines can access them and expedite time to therapy.

BMS Access Support, the Bristol Myers Squibb patient access and reimbursement program, is designed to help appropriate patients initiate and maintain access to BMS medicines during their treatment journey. BMS Access Support offers benefit investigation, prior authorization assistance, as well as co-pay assistance for eligible, commercially insured patients. More information about our access and reimbursement support can be obtained by calling BMS Access Support at 1-800-861-0048 or by visiting www.bmsaccesssupport.com.

About the Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical Collaboration

In 2011, through a collaboration agreement with Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb expanded its territorial rights to develop and commercialize Opdivo globally, except in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, where Ono had retained all rights to the compound at the time. On July 23, 2014, Ono and Bristol Myers Squibb further expanded the companies’ strategic collaboration agreement to jointly develop and commercialize multiple immunotherapies – as single agents and combination regimens – for patients with cancer in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.