Debiopharm’s Novel IAP Antagonist Debio 1143 Achieves Outstanding Phase II Results for High-Risk Head and Neck Cancer Patients

On September 30, 2019 Debiopharm, a Swiss-based global biopharmaceutical company, reported, at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress (European Society for Medical Oncology), compelling results from a robust, randomized, Phase II study of Debio 1143 for the treatment of high-risk, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) patients in combination with current standard of care, chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) (Press release, Debiopharm, SEP 30, 2019, View Source [SID1234539958]). Clinical results with Debio 1143, the most clinically advanced IAP antagonist, revealed a statistically significant improvement of the primary endpoint locoregional control rate (LRC – 21% improvement at 18 months after CRT vs. control arm) and a striking progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs. the control arm after a 2-year follow-up period.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

This double-blind, randomized, control group study, combined Debio 1143 with CRT in patients with previously untreated stage III, IVA or IVB SCCHN. The majority of patients enrolled were considered high-risk, facing a poor prognosis, including HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients and heavy smokers (>10 pack-years). Ninety-six patients were enrolled at 19 centers across France and Switzerland. The study explored whether the addition of Debio 1143 at 200 mg/d to standard CRT could increase treatment efficacy compared to CRT and placebo. The primary endpoint of LRC-rate at 18 months was met. For key secondary endpoints, clinically compelling and statistically significant outcomes in Progression-Free survival (PFS) at 24-months were observed along with positive trends for overall survival (OS) and complete response (CR) rates in the active treatment group vs. CRT+placebo, although these parameters have not yet reached statistical maturity.

"Combined with the standard of care, Debio 1143 has demonstrated significant efficacy – especially in locoregional control rate and progression free survival – in high-risk previously untreated LA-SCCHN patients," commented Pr. Jean Bourhis, Head of the Radio-Oncology Department CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland, and Lead Investigator of the study. "The chemo-radio-sensitizing effect of Debio 1143 constitutes a highly promising strategy to ultimately allow high-risk head and neck patients to achieve better control over their disease for longer."

"The positive topline results are very encouraging and support our efforts to provide head and neck cancer patients and clinicians with this potential new treatment option," said Bertrand Ducrey, CEO of Debiopharm International. "This data demonstrates proof of concept for the potential use of Debio 1143 in other CRT applications, potentially expanding therapeutic reach and making a difference in a wide range of indications."

In addition, Debio 1143 showed a predictable and manageable safety profile, without substantial additional toxicity to standard CRT.

ESMO 2019 Session Details

Abstract

Presenting investigator

Sept. 30th , 10:15am
Cordoba Auditorium
(Hall 7)

Preferred Paper –
Head and neck cancer

LBA65 – Double-blind Randomized Phase 2 Results
Comparing Concurrent Highdose Cisplatin Chemorradiation
(CRT) plus Debio 1143 or Placebo In High-risk Patients with
Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head
and Neck (SCCHN): A GORTEC Study

Prof. Jean Bourhis,

Head of the Radio-
Oncology Department
CHUV, Lausanne,
Switzerland, Lead
study author

About Debio 1143
Debio 1143 is an antagonist of IAPs (inhibitor of apoptosis proteins), acting as chemo-radio-sensitizer to enhance treatment efficacy with a dual mode of action, promoting programmed cell death and fostering anti-tumor immunity. Currently in clinical development in a broad range of cancer types, the compound is being developed in combination with chemo-radiotherapy or with ICIs (PD-1/PD-L1), with reported data consistently showing a favorable safety profile. Over 200 patients have been treated so far with Debio 1143 in various indications and lines of treatment.

Trial information:

Head & neck cancers: patients.debiopharm.com/head-and-neck-cancer/
Small cell lung cancers: patients.debiopharm.com/small-cell-lung-cancer-sclc/
Gastrointestinal cancers: patients.debiopharm.com/gastrointestinal-cancers/
Gynecologic cancers: patients.debiopharm.com/gynecologic-cancer/
Debiopharm’s commitment to cancer patients
Debiopharm aims to develop innovative therapies that target high unmet medical needs in oncology. Bridging the gap between disruptive discovery products and real-world patient reach, we identify high-potential compounds for in-licensing, clinically demonstrate their safety and efficacy and then select large pharmaceutical commercialization partners to maximize patient access globally.

Pfizer Presents Interim Analysis Results from Phase 3 BEACON CRC Trial of BRAFTOVI® (Encorafenib), MEKTOVI® (Binimetinib) and Cetuximab for the Treatment of BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

On September 30, 2019 Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) reported detailed results from the interim analysis of the Phase 3 BEACON CRC trial evaluating the combination of BRAFTOVI (encorafenib), MEKTOVI (binimetinib), and cetuximab (BRAFTOVI Triplet), in patients with advanced BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), following one or two lines of therapy (Press release, Pfizer, SEP 30, 2019, View Source [SID1234539904]). The results show significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and objective response rates (ORR) for the BRAFTOVI Triplet and BRAFTOVI Doublet combination (BRAFTOVI and cetuximab), compared to cetuximab plus irinotecan-containing regimens (Control), and provide analysis of the efficacy and safety of the BRAFTOVI Triplet compared to the BRAFTOVI Doublet. These data will be presented today during a late-breaking oral session at the 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress in Barcelona, Spain, and simultaneously published online in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Pfizer intends to submit the results of the BEACON CRC trial for marketing approval in the U.S. in the fourth quarter of 2019. The use of BRAFTOVI, MEKTOVI and cetuximab for the treatment of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC is investigational and not approved by the FDA.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

As previously announced, the BRAFTOVI Triplet showed a median OS of 9.0 months for patients treated with the Triplet, compared to 5.4 months for Control ([HR 0.52, (95% CI 0.39-0.70), p<0.0001]). The BRAFTOVI Triplet also demonstrated a significantly improved ORR of 26% (95% CI: 18%, 35%) compared to 2% (95% CI: 0%, 7%) for Control (p<0.0001).

"We are pleased to share these data from the BEACON CRC trial with the oncology community," said Chris Boshoff, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Development Officer, Oncology, Pfizer Global Product Development. "With no approved therapies currently indicated specifically for BRAF-mutant mCRC, we believe that the evidence so far shows encouraging potential for the BRAFTOVI Triplet to make a meaningful impact on the lives of those living with this disease."

The study also showed improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints. As previously announced, the BRAFTOVI Doublet showed a statistically significant improvement in OS (median 8.4 months vs. 5.4 months, [HR 0.60, 95% CI (0.45-0.79), p=0.0003]) compared to Control. Additional analysis showed depth of responses in favor of the BRAFTOVI Triplet.

"The BEACON CRC trial results show meaningful improvements compared to an available standard of care for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC," said Scott Kopetz, M.D., Ph.D., FACP, Associate Professor of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. "These data presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) and published in The NEJM further support the potential of the BRAFTOVI Triplet to be the first chemotherapy-free, targeted regimen for this patient population, who have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options."

Further, the data provide additional details on the primary and secondary endpoints, including observations of response rates by number of lines of prior therapy, as well as a descriptive analysis of OS comparing the BRAFTOVI Triplet to the BRAFTOVI Doublet.

The BEACON CRC study was not powered to compare the two experimental arms directly and such a comparison is further limited by the interim nature of the analysis. In the data being presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper), results of the descriptive analysis of survival comparing the BRAFTOVI Triplet to the BRAFTOVI Doublet favored the Triplet combination.

As previously reported, the BRAFTOVI Triplet and Doublet were generally well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were seen in 58%, 50% and 61% of patients in the BRAFTOVI Triplet, Doublet and Control arms, respectively. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events was seen in 7%, 8% and 11% of patients in the Triplet, Doublet and Control arms, respectively. The most common Grade 3 or higher AEs seen in patients treated with the BRAFTOVI Triplet were diarrhea (10% vs. 2% in the Doublet arm and 10% in the Control arm), abdominal pain (6% vs. 2% in the Doublet arm and 5% in the Control arm) and nausea (5% vs. <1% in the Double arm and 1% in the Control arm).

Details for the late-breaking oral presentation are below. The abstract can be accessed through the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) website: View Source

Title/Abstract Number

Date/Time (CEST)

Location

(LBA32)

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or
without binimetinib for BRAF V600E–
mutant metastatic colorectal cancer:
expanded results from a randomized,
3-arm, phase 3 study vs. the choice
of either irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus
cetuximab (BEACON CRC)

Tabernero J

Monday, September 30
8:30-8:45 AM

Barcelona
Auditorium

About Colorectal Cancer

Worldwide, colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in men and the second most common in women, with approximately 1.8 million new diagnoses in 2018.1,2 In the U.S. alone, an estimated 140,250 patients were diagnosed with cancer of the colon or rectum in 2018, and approximately 50,000 are estimated to die of their disease each year.3 BRAF mutations are estimated to occur in up to 15% of patients with mCRC and represent a poor prognosis for these patients.4,5,6,7,8,9 The V600 mutation is the most common BRAF mutation and the risk of mortality in CRC patients with the BRAFV600E mutation is more than two times higher than for those with wild-type BRAF.7,8 BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC is an area of high unmet need as there are currently no approved therapies specifically indicated for patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC.10,[11],11

About BEACON CRC

BEACON CRC is a randomized, open-label, global trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of BRAFTOVI, MEKTOVI and cetuximab in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC whose disease has progressed after one or two prior regimens. BEACON CRC is the first and only Phase 3 trial designed to test a BRAF/MEK combo targeted therapy in BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

Thirty patients were treated in a safety lead-in conducted prior to initiation of the randomized part of the trial and received the Triplet combination (BRAFTOVI 300 mg daily, MEKTOVI 45 mg twice daily and cetuximab per label). Of the 30 patients, 29 had a BRAFV600 mutation. As previously announced, the Triplet combination showed an acceptable safety profile that supported initiation of the randomized portion of the trial.

The randomized portion of the BEACON CRC trial is designed to assess the efficacy of BRAFTOVI in combination with cetuximab with or without MEKTOVI compared to cetuximab and irinotecan-based therapy. 665 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive the Triplet combination, the Doublet combination (BRAFTOVI and cetuximab) or the control arm (irinotecan-based therapy and cetuximab). The study was amended to include an interim analysis of endpoints including ORR. The primary overall survival endpoint is a comparison of the Triplet combination to the control arm. Secondary endpoints address efficacy of the Doublet combination compared to the control arm, and the Triplet combination compared to the Doublet therapy. Other secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, duration of response, safety and tolerability. Health related quality of life data will also be assessed. The trial is being conducted at over 200 investigational sites in North America, South America, Europe and the Asia Pacific region. The BEACON CRC trial is being conducted with support from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pierre Fabre and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (support is for sites outside of North America).

About BRAFTOVI + MEKTOVI

BRAFTOVI is an oral small molecule BRAF kinase inhibitor and MEKTOVI is an oral small molecule MEK inhibitor which target key enzymes in the MAPK signaling pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK). Inappropriate activation of proteins in this pathway has been shown to occur in many cancers including melanoma, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and others. In the U.S., BRAFTOVI + MEKTOVI are approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test. BRAFTOVI is not indicated for treatment of patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma. In Europe, the combination is approved for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, as detected by a validated test. In Japan, the combination is approved for unresectable melanoma with a BRAF mutation. BRAFTOVI + MEKTOVI have received regulatory approval in Australia and the Swiss Medicines Agency (Swissmedic) is currently reviewing the Marketing Authorization Applications for BRAFTOVI and MEKTOVI submitted by Pierre Fabre.

Pfizer has exclusive rights to BRAFTOVI and MEKTOVI in the U.S. and Canada. Pfizer has granted Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. exclusive rights to commercialize both products in Japan and South Korea, Medison exclusive rights to commercialize both products in Israel and Pierre Fabre exclusive rights to commercialize both products in all other countries, including Europe, Latin America and Asia (excluding Japan and South Korea).

Indications and Usage

BRAFTOVI (encorafenib) and MEKTOVI (binimetinib) are kinase inhibitors indicated for use in combination for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Limitations of Use: BRAFTOVI is not indicated for the treatment of patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma.

BRAFTOVI + MEKTOVI Important Safety Information

The information below applies to the safety of the combination of BRAFTOVI and MEKTOVI unless otherwise noted. See full Prescribing Information for BRAFTOVI and for MEKTOVI for dose modifications for adverse reactions.

Warnings and Precautions

New Primary Malignancies: Cutaneous and non-cutaneous malignancies can occur. In the COLUMBUS trial, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, including keratoacanthoma, occurred in 2.6% and basal cell carcinoma occurred in 1.6% of patients. Perform dermatologic evaluations prior to initiating treatment, every 2 months during treatment, and for up to 6 months following discontinuation of treatment. Manage suspicious skin lesions with excision and dermatopathologic evaluation. Dose modification is not recommended for new primary cutaneous malignancies. Based on its mechanism of action, BRAFTOVI may promote malignancies associated with activation of RAS through mutation or other mechanisms. Monitor patients receiving BRAFTOVI for signs and symptoms of non-cutaneous malignancies. Discontinue BRAFTOVI for RAS mutation-positive non-cutaneous malignancies.

Tumor Promotion in BRAF Wild-Type Tumors: Confirm evidence of BRAFV600E or V600K mutation prior to initiating BRAFTOVI.

Cardiomyopathy, manifesting as left ventricular dysfunction associated with symptomatic or asymptomatic decreases in ejection fraction, has been reported in patients. In the COLUMBUS trial, cardiomyopathy occurred in 7% and Grade 3 left ventricular dysfunction occurred in 1.6% of patients. Cardiomyopathy resolved in 87% of patients. Assess left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiogram or MUGA scan prior to initiating treatment, 1 month after initiating treatment, and then every 2 to 3 months during treatment. Safety has not been established in patients with a baseline ejection fraction that is either below 50% or below the institutional lower limit of normal. Patients with cardiovascular risk factors should be monitored closely.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): In the COLUMBUS trial, VTE occurred in 6% of patients, including 3.1% of patients who developed pulmonary embolism.

Hemorrhage: In the COLUMBUS trial, hemorrhage occurred in 19% of patients and ≥ Grade 3 hemorrhage occurred in 3.2% of patients. Fatal intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of new or progressive brain metastases occurred in 1.6% of patients. The most frequent hemorrhagic events were gastrointestinal, including rectal hemorrhage (4.2%), hematochezia (3.1%), and hemorrhoidal hemorrhage (1%).

Ocular Toxicities: In the COLUMBUS trial, serous retinopathy occurred in 20% of patients; 8% were retinal detachment and 6% were macular edema. Symptomatic serous retinopathy occurred in 8% of patients with no cases of blindness. RVO is a known class-related adverse reaction of MEK inhibitors and may occur in patients treated with MEKTOVI in combination with encorafenib. In patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma across multiple clinical trials, 0.1% of patients experienced retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The safety of MEKTOVI has not been established in patients with a history of RVO or current risk factors for RVO including uncontrolled glaucoma or a history of hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes. Perform ophthalmological evaluation for patient-reported acute vision loss or other visual disturbance within 24 hours. Permanently discontinue MEKTOVI in patients with documented RVO. In COLUMBUS, uveitis, including iritis and iridocyclitis was reported in 4% of patients. Assess for visual symptoms at each visit. Perform ophthalmological evaluation at regular intervals and for any visual disturbances, and to follow new or persistent ophthalmologic findings.

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD): ILD, including pneumonitis occurred in 0.3% of patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma across multiple clinical trials. Assess new or progressive unexplained pulmonary symptoms or findings for possible ILD.

Hepatotoxicity: In the COLUMBUS trial, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 increases in liver function laboratory tests was 6% for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and 2.6% for aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and 0.5% for alkaline phosphatase. Monitor liver laboratory tests before and during treatment and as clinically indicated.

Rhabdomyolysis: In the COLUMBUS trial, elevation of laboratory values of serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) occurred in 58% of patients. Rhabdomyolysis was reported in 0.1% of patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma across multiple clinical trials. Monitor CPK and creatinine levels prior to initiating MEKTOVI, periodically during treatment, and as clinically indicated.

QTc Prolongation: BRAFTOVI is associated with dose-dependent QTc interval prolongation in some patients. In the COLUMBUS trial, an increase in QTcF to > 500 ms was measured in 0.5% (1/192) of patients. Monitor patients who already have or who are at significant risk of developing QTc prolongation. Correct hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia prior to and during BRAFTOVI administration. Withhold, reduce dose, or permanently discontinue for QTc > 500 ms.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: BRAFTOVI or MEKTOVI can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women. BRAFTOVI can render hormonal contraceptives ineffective. Non-hormonal contraceptives should be used during treatment and for at least 30 days after the final dose for patients taking BRAFTOVI + MEKTOVI.

Adverse Reactions

The most common adverse reactions (≥20%, all Grades, in the COLUMBUS trial): were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, arthralgia, myopathy, hyperkeratosis, rash, headache, constipation, visual impairment, serous retinopathy.

In the COLUMBUS trial, the most common laboratory abnormalities (≥20%, all Grades): included increased creatinine, increased CPK, increased gamma glutamyl transferase, anemia, increased ALT, hyperglycemia, increased AST, and increased alkaline phosphatase.

Drug Interactions

Avoid concomitant use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers and sensitive CYP3A4 substrates with BRAFTOVI. Modify BRAFTOVI dose if concomitant use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors cannot be avoided. Avoid co-administration of BRAFTOVI with medicinal products with a known potential to prolong QT/QTc interval.

Please see full Prescribing Information for BRAFTOVI and full Prescribing Information for MEKTOVI for additional information.12,13

Cellectar Presents Data from DLBCL Cohort of its Phase 2 CLOVER-1 Study at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress

On September 30, 2019 Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLRB), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of drugs for the treatment of cancer, reported Jarrod Longcor, chief business officer of Cellectar, presented data from the diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cohort in the company’s Phase 2 CLOVER-1 study of CLR 131 in relapsed or refractory select B-cell malignancies at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2019 being held from September 27 – October 1, 2019 in Barcelona, Spain (Press release, Cellectar Biosciences, SEP 30, 2019, View Source [SID1234539924]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The oral presentation, entitled: "Interim Evaluation of a Targeted Radiotherapeutic, CLR 131, in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients (R/R DLBCL)," featured data from 6 subjects who received a single 30-minute intravenous (IV) dose of 25mCi/m2 of CLR 131. Data showed durable responses, including a 33% overall response rate (ORR), a 16.6% complete response rate (CR) and a 50% clinical benefit rate (CBR). All patients enrolled in the study received an average of 3 prior lines of systemic therapy, 5 of 6 patients were refractory to at least one prior line of therapy. Importantly, CLR 131 showed activity against both germinal center and activated DLBCL. In a patient for whom cytogenetics was available, CLR 131 showed activity against c-Myc and BCL-2 mutation (single & dual-hit) positive patients. As required by the Lugano Criteria for Response, the patient who experienced a CR had a total reduction in tumor volume of greater than 99% and continues to be a CR at 510+ days post dosing. This patient was refractory to two prior treatment lines, which included the combination regimen RICE.

Analysis of dosing showed that the disease control rate and progression free survival were markedly improved in patients receiving a dosing ratio of 1.2% or greater (drug to tumor volume) versus those receiving below a 1.2% dosing ratio. Finally, the most frequent adverse events (AE) in DLBCL patients were consistent with prior studies of CLR 131; the majority of AEs being hematologic in nature and predominately Grades 1 and 2.

"The data presented show an encouraging overall response rate including a complete response at the time of the interim assessment after a single 30-minute IV dose of 25mCi/m2 of CLR 131. We remain optimistic that CLR 131 has the potential to provide a meaningful treatment option for a variety of lymphoma patients and look forward to reporting additional data from this Phase 2 CLOVER-1 study in 2019," said James Caruso, president and CEO of Cellectar. "The study remains ongoing and, based on this cohort and additional data from an ongoing dose escalation Phase 1 study, patients in the Phase 2 CLOVER-1 study are now receiving a higher 37.50 mCi/m2 fractionated dose administered in two 30-minute infusions of 18.75mCi/m2."

About the Phase 2 CLOVER-1 Trial

CLOVER-1 is a Phase 2 study of CLR 131 being conducted in approximately 10 leading cancer centers in the United States in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell hematologic cancers. The hematologic cancers being studied in the trial include multiple myeloma (MM), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

The study will enroll up to 80 patients. Its primary endpoint is clinical benefit response (CBR), with additional endpoints of overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS) and other markers of efficacy following a fractionated dose of 37.575mCi/m2 of CLR 131 administered in two 30-minute infusions of 18.75mCi/m2 of CLR 131 administered on day 1 and day 8, with the option for a second dose cycle approximately 75-180 days later. The company expects to report topline data in 2019.

Cellectar was awarded approximately $2 million in non-dilutive grant funding from the National Cancer Institute to help fund the trial. More information about the trial, including eligibility requirements, can be found at www.clinicaltrials.gov, reference NCT02952508.

About CLR 131

CLR 131 is a small-molecule, cancer-targeting radiotherapeutic Phospholipid Drug ConjugateTM (PDC) designed to deliver cytotoxic radiation directly and selectively to cancer cells and cancer stem cells. CLR 131 is the company’s lead therapeutic PDC product candidate and is currently being evaluated in both Phase 2 and Phase 1 clinical studies. The FDA granted orphan drug designation for CLR 131 for the treatment of multiple myeloma as well as orphan drug and rare pediatric disease designations for CLR 131 for the treatment of neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma. In addition to the ongoing Phase 1 dose-escalation study and the Phase 2 (CLOVER-1) trial, the company recently initiated a Phase 1 open-label, dose-escalating study in pediatric solid tumors and lymphoma to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single intravenous administration of CLR 131 in up to 30 children and adolescents with cancers including neuroblastoma, sarcomas, lymphomas (including Hodgkin’s lymphoma) and malignant brain tumors.

Oragenics Presents Interim Data on The AG013 Phase 2 Clinical Trial at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2019

On September 30, 2019 Oragenics, Inc. (NYSE American:OGEN) ("Oragenics"), a leader in the development of novel antibiotics against infectious diseases and effective treatments for oral mucositis, reported initial data from its ongoing Phase 2, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of AG013 in oral mucositis presented in a poster session at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2019 in Barcelona, Spain (Press release, Oragenics, SEP 30, 2019, View Source [SID1234539940]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Titled, "Severe oral mucositis (SOM) mitigation by genetically modified Lactococcus lactis bacteria (LLB) producing human trefoil factor 1 (hTFF1; AG013) in patients being treated with concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) for oral and oropharyngeal cancers (OCOPC)," was presented at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2019 in Barcelona, Spain. The poster can be found under the "Presentations" tab in the "News and Media" section of the Company’s website, located at www.oragenics.com.

The poster presentation describes the methods and initial blinded results from the ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial for the Company’s lead oral mucositis product candidate, AG013. The ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm, multi-center trial, in which approximately 200 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either AG013 or placebo three times daily following meals, beginning on the first day of chemoradiation therapy and continuing through the course of cancer treatment. The purpose of this Phase 2 clinical study, (NCT03234465), is to evaluate the efficacy (preventing the occurrence and shortening the duration of SOM), safety, and tolerability of a convenient topically administered rinse of AG013 compared to a placebo for reducing the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients undergoing traditional chemoradiation for the treatment of head and neck cancer. The initial data, submitted in the abstract, reflects the results for 42 of the 71 enrolled and randomized patients across 48 study sites and demonstrates that in the blinded, combined placebo and active treatment groups, there was sufficient evidence of efficacy and safety to continue the study.

Additional data accumulated since poster submission, indicates the blinded efficacy evaluation, which included any patient with SOM after week one of treatment and those receiving a cumulative dose of 55 Gy (week 6 of treatment), demonstrated an overall SOM incidence of 47%, which is lower than would be expected based on historical data in the head and neck cancer population receiving this chemoradiation regimen. The overall rate of SOM was reported in only 13.1 % (110 of 842) of evaluable visits. The overall safety profile is consistent with those adverse events that normally occur in cancer patients receiving chemoradiation therapy. As a reminder, the study remains blinded and individual treatment responses remain to be identified. The lead author for the poster presentation is Suraj Singh, M.D., of the MultiCare Regional Cancer Center in Tacoma, Washington.

Alan Joslyn, President & CEO of Oragenics, Inc. said, "As we recently announced, we are more than 75 percent enrolled in this study, and we continue to be encouraged by both the pace of enrollment and the overall clinical results as reported in this poster presentation. While it remains difficult to comment on efficacy outcomes based on these data, we are pleased with the safety profile we are seeing in the study. Due to the high incidence of SOM in head and neck cancer patients, and the blinded results seen to date, we maintain the belief that this compound will provide a convenient meaningful therapeutic benefit for these patients with limited treatment alternatives and no therapies available for prevention of their oral mucositis."

About Oral Mucositis

Oral mucositis is currently one of the most common and debilitating complications of cancer chemo- and radiation therapy. The condition is caused by the breakdown of the mucosal lining in the oral cavity resulting in the formation of painful mouth ulcers. When these mouth ulcers progress to World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4, patients by definition, have their ability to eat (grade 3) and drink (grade 4) impacted resulting in emergency room visits or hospitalization in order to provide pain control and nutritional support. During these periods, patients run the risk of interruption of their chemo- and radiation therapies with the potential risk of negative cancer treatment outcomes. The incidence of SOM is approximately 70% in oropharyngeal cancer patients.

About AG013

AG013, which has been granted Fast Track designation with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and orphan drug status in Europe, is an ActoBiotics therapeutic candidate formulated to deliver the therapeutic molecule Trefoil Factor 1 to the mucosal tissues in the oral cavity in a convenient oral rinsing solution. Trefoil Factors are a class of peptides involved in the protection of gastrointestinal tissues against mucosal damage and play an important role in subsequent repair. The compound was designed by the company’s strategic partner, ActoBio Therapeutics, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intrexon Corporation (NYSE:XON).

GlaxoSmithKline Releases New Data to Showcase Antitumor Activity of ICOS Receptor Agonist GSK3359609 in Combination with Pemizumab in the Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

On September 30, 2019 GlaxoSmithKline plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK ) reported an inducible T cell costimulatory molecule (ICOS) designed to selectively enhance T cell function The agonist antibody GSK3359609 exhibits promising antitumor activity in combination with pemizumab in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) PD-1/L1 (Press release, GlaxoSmithKline, SEP 30, 2019, View Source;834146127.html [SID1234539959]). The results of the INDUCE-1 study also showed that GSK3359609 has a single drug activity in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma PD-1/L1.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The safety and tolerability of GSK3359609 is consistent with the results reported in the INDUCE-1 (dose escalation phase). The data was released at the 2019 European Conference of Cancer Society in Barcelona, ​​Spain.

GlaxoSmithKline reported that the inducible T cell costimulatory molecule (ICOS) agonist antibody GSK3359609, which is designed to selectively enhance T cell function, is combined with pemizumab for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) PD- The 1/L1 initial treatment patient showed promising anti-tumor activity.

Dr. Axel Hoos , senior vice president and head of oncology research and development , said: "GSK3359609 and other immunotherapy are key components in the field of oncology. INDUCE-1 data demonstrates that GSK3359609 enhances antitumor activity (beyond We are encouraged by the potential of PD-1 to block the anti-tumor activity. The observed clinical response is very encouraging. Based on the precedent of CTLA-4 or PD-1, we want to prove our ICOS The main effect of agonists is to improve patient survival, and this requires further research. Based on these results, we will launch the INDUCE-3 registration trial, which combines the use of GSK3359609 and pemizumab to treat first-line recurrence/metascale head and neck scales. Potential survival benefits of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (PD-L1 positive)."

The published data comes from the development phase of INDUCE-1, the first open-label study in humans to study GSK3359609 as a monotherapy and a combination of other regimens. The patients in the study had relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and had previously received up to five therapies in the late stages. Patients in the monotherapy group were previously treated with PD-1/L1 and 1 mg/kg GSK3359609. Patients in the combination drug group received PD-1/L1 treatment for the first time, taking 0.3 mg/kg GSK3359609 and 200 mg pemizumab. Patients in both groups received a two-year assessment until the condition progressed or unacceptable toxicity occurred.

Of the 34 patients who received combination therapy, the overall response rate was 24% (n=8; 95% CI: 11,58.7). Remission in the combination drug group was long-lasting, and all responders maintained a 6-month or longer improvement (no median; 95% CI: 4.2 months, NR); median progression-free survival (PFS) ) for 5.6 months (95% CI: 2.4, 7.4). Among the 21 patients with known PD-L1 expression data, most responders and stable patients had a PD-L1 score of less than 20 points. Among the 16 patients who underwent monotherapy, the overall response rate was 6% (n = 1; 95% CI: 0.2, 30.2).

The INDUCE-1 study was conducted in accordance with an agreement between GlaxoSmithKline and Merck & Co, Inc. ("MSD" outside the United States and Canada). GlaxoSmithKline will continue to work with MSD to support the INDUCE-3 Phase II/III combination drug trials to be launched by the end of 2019.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a cancer developed from squamous cells in the mouth, nose and throat mucosa. It is the seventh most common cancer in the world, with approximately 600,000 newly diagnosed cases each year. i Although head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is more common in the over 50-year-old or 60-year-old men, but the incidence in younger individuals is increasing. Ii Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors are highly immunogenic and have high expression of immunological checkpoint regulators (including ICOS and PD-1). Iii

The GSK3359609 Clinical Development Program
GSK3359609 clinical development program aims to investigate the anti-tumor potential of a variety of tumor-targeted ICOS receptors by single agonist antibodies in combination with other immunological checkpoint therapies.

GSK3359609 is not currently approved for use anywhere in the world.

i Genetics Home Reference. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma – Genetics Home Reference – NIH. US National Library of Medicine. View Source Statistics. Published January 2015 . Accessed September 1, 2019 .

I National Institute of Health. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. US National Library of Medicine. View Source. Published August 20, 2019 .

Iii Canning M, et al. Heterogeneity of the Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Immune Landscape and Its Impact on Immunotherapy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019; 7: 52.

###

GlaxoSmithKline’s performance in the field of oncology

GlaxoSmithKline is committed to maximizing patient survival by converting drugs. GlaxoSmithKline focuses on immuno-oncology, cell therapy, cancer epigenetics and overall mortality. The company’s goal is to achieve a sustainable flow of new therapies based on a diverse portfolio of research drugs, using small molecules, antibodies, antibody drug combinations and cells, either alone or in combination.