BostonGene Evaluates Novel Therapies and Immune System Profiling as a Marker of Response in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers

On January 14, 2025 BostonGene, a leading provider of AI-driven molecular and immune profiling solutions, and Georgetown University’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center reported a collaboration to explore the effectiveness of immune system profiling to monitor patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers receiving combinations of immunotherapy and anti-VEGF inhibitors in the microscopic residual disease (MRD) setting (Press release, BostonGene, JAN 14, 2025, View Source [SID1234649728]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Currently, surveillance for GI cancer patients having undergone curative-intent procedures relies on radiologic imaging and non-specific lab tests with poor sensitivity, often detecting relapse only after it has advanced. Biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), have emerged as non-invasive blood tests with the ability to identify the earliest signs of cancer relapse, or MRD. This multi-institution feasibility study aims to identify high-risk patients with GI cancers who have completed standard of care curative-intent therapies but have MRD in the surveillance setting, defined by detectable ctDNA but no evidence of radiographic relapse. These high-risk patients are then treated with combination of atezolizumab (immune checkpoint blockade) and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF therapy) while assessing ctDNA serially for MRD clearance. The study aims to obtain pilot data on ctDNA as a new tool to detect early signals of therapeutic efficacy within months of starting treatment.

Immune system profiling, a non-invasive blood-based tool can detect unique and specific cancer-driven changes in a patient’s immunity often not detected by conventional methods. In this trial, the investigators hope to characterize the baseline and on-treatment changes in the peripheral blood immune profiles of patients with MRD receiving immunotherapy. Evaluating peripheral blood immune profiles as predictive biomarkers is promising in the MRD setting where tumor biopsies are not feasible and systemic immune surveillance is relevant in eradicating micrometastases.

The pioneering study will explore immune system profiling as a new predictive marker of therapeutic response. By tracking immune system profiling and ctDNA trends post-treatment, it aims to generate pilot data on immune system profiling’s feasibility in guiding treatment and improving outcomes in GI cancer patients.

"We need new approaches for improving outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal cancers," said principal investigator John L. Marshall, MD, director of the Ruesch Center for the Cure of GI Cancers at Georgetown Lombardi. "If we can validate immune system profiling as a reliable early marker of MRD, it would be a pivotal step towards enhancing early detection, optimizing treatment strategies, and ultimately preventing relapse." Marshall treats patients at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital.

"If we can demonstrate feasibility of enrolling patients and clearing ctDNA with immunotherapy in this pilot study, it could lead to future validation studies of novel therapeutics in the MRD setting and ctDNA as a surrogate for survival with the hopes of expediting drug discovery in the adjuvant and post-adjuvant settings," said co-principal investigator Reetu Mukherji, MD, assistant professor of medicine at Georgetown and co-writer of the study. "Additionally, our study will incorporate correlative science to study the yet unknown peripheral blood immune profiles of patients with MRD using the BostonGene peripheral blood profiling assay. Most ICI biomarkers studied to date are based on molecular or immune profiling of tumor tissue or molecular testing of ctDNA. However, liquid immunoprofiling is an emerging technology that holds ICI biomarker promise and warrants further study. This study has the potential to identify novel predictive biomarkers and hopefully one day transform current approaches to improve survival rates for patients who have undergone curative treatment."

Marshall and Mukherji both treat patients at MedStar Health, Georgetown’s academic health system partner.

Using advanced molecular and immune profiling capabilities, BostonGene will characterize each patient’s immune environment, providing detailed insights into how immune system profiling trends correlate with therapeutic outcomes. This analysis will facilitate the identification of predictive biomarkers, potentially informing future clinical applications of immune system profiling for MRD monitoring. By utilizing advanced multiomic data analysis and immune system profiling technology, BostonGene will also deliver essential insights into how a patient’s immune changes during and after therapy.

"We are excited to collaborate with Georgetown Lombardi," said Nathan Fowler, MD, Chief Medical Officer at BostonGene. "Our expertise in molecular and immune profiling, combined with immune system analysis, has the potential to revolutionize how MRD is detected and managed in GI cancers. By providing critical insights into immune system dynamics, we empower clinicians to make more informed, timely treatment decisions, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing relapse rates."

New Sarclisa subcutaneous formulation met co-primary endpoints in the IRAKLIA phase 3 study in multiple myeloma

On January 9, 2025 Sanofi reported results from the investigational, randomized, open-label IRAKLIA phase 3 study demonstrated that Sarclisa administered at a fixed dose subcutaneously (SC) via an on-body delivery system (OBDS) in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) met its co-primary endpoints of non-inferior objective response rate (ORR) and observed concentration before dosing (C trough) at steady state compared to intravenous (IV) Sarclisa administered at a weight-based dose in combination with Pd in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) (Filing, 6-K, Sanofi, JAN 14, 2025, View Source [SID1234649713]). Key secondary endpoints, including very good partial response (VGPR), incidence rate of infusion reactions and C trough at cycle 2 were also achieved. The study is ongoing, and the full results will be presented at a forthcoming medical meeting.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Sikander Ailawadhi, MD

Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology at Mayo Clinic Florida and principal investigator of the study

"The consistent overall response rate and comparable efficacy and safety profile observed in the IRAKLIA study for subcutaneous Sarclisa represent an exciting advancement, offering insight into a potential new administration option for patients. The results from IRAKLIA, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, support the potential of an on-body delivery system to help ease the delivery of a new formulation without impacting patient outcomes."

The IRAKLIA study was conducted using Enable Injections’ enFuse hands-free OBDS, which was designed to administer high-volume medicines subcutaneously through an automated drug delivery technology. The enFuse device leverages a hidden and retractable needle that is thinner compared to commonly used SC injection needles.

Houman Ashrafian, MD, PhD

Executive Vice President, Head of Research and Development at Sanofi

"We are fueled by our focus on innovation and finding best-in-class solutions to help ease the burden of disease for patients. The IRAKLIA study results are a prime example of what’s driving our scientific engine. Being able to possibly bring a novel option that helps reduce time in a healthcare facility is driven by our patient and provider-centric mindset. We look forward to sharing full results and working to bring this new advancement to the multiple myeloma community."

Additional studies evaluating Sarclisa SC formulations across different combinations and lines of therapy are ongoing. The safety and efficacy of Sarclisa SC and the enFuse device have not been evaluated by any regulatory authority outside of their approved indications. Regulatory submissions in the US and in the EU are planned during the first half of 2025.

About the IRAKLIA study

IRAKLIA is a randomized, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study evaluating the non-inferiority of Sarclisa SC formulation administered at a fixed dose subcutaneously via an OBDS versus weight-based dosed Sarclisa IV in combination with Pd in adult patients with R/R MM. The study enrolled 531 patients across 252 global sites, who were equally randomized to receive Sarclisa SC or IV in combination with Pd for 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs), participant request to discontinue therapy or any other reason, whichever came first. In the SC arm, Sarclisa was administered at a fixed dose SC weekly for four weeks during the first cycle and every two weeks for subsequent cycles. In the IV arm, Sarclisa was administered at a weight-based dose via IV infusion weekly for four weeks during the first cycle and every two weeks for subsequent cycles. The study enrolled adult patients with MM who have received at least one prior line of therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.

The co-primary outcomes being assessed are ORR, defined as the proportion of patients with stringent complete response, complete response, VGPR, and partial response (PR) according to the 2016 IMWG criteria assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC), and observed C trough at steady state, defined as observed Sarclisa plasma concentrations.

About Enable Injections

Based in the US (Cincinnati, Ohio), Enable Injections is a global healthcare innovation company committed to improving the patient treatment experience through the development and manufacturing of enFuse. enFuse is an innovative wearable drug delivery platform that is designed to deliver large volumes of pharmaceutical and biologic therapeutics via subcutaneous administration, with the aim of improving convenience, supporting superior outcomes, and advancing healthcare system economics. For more information, visit View Source

About Sarclisa

Sarclisa (isatuximab) is a CD38 monoclonal antibody that binds to a specific epitope on the CD38 receptor on MM cells, inducing distinct antitumor activity. It is designed to work through multiple mechanisms of action including programmed tumor cell death (apoptosis) and immunomodulatory activity. CD38 is highly and uniformly expressed on the surface of MM cells, making it a target for antibody-based therapeutics such as Sarclisa. In the US, the non-proprietary name for Sarclisa is isatuximab-irfc, with irfc as the suffix designated in accordance with nonproprietary naming of biological products guidance for industry issued by the US FDA.

Currently, Sarclisa is approved in more than 50 countries, including the US and EU, across two indications; Sarclisa is approved under an additional indication in the US. Based on the ICARIA-MM phase 3 study, Sarclisa is approved in combination with Pd for the treatment of patients with R/R MM who have received ≥2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, and who progressed on last therapy. Based on the IKEMA phase 3 study, Sarclisa is also approved in 50 countries in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone, including in the US for the treatment of patients with R/R MM who have received 1–3 prior lines of therapy and in the EU for patients with MM who have received at least 1 prior therapy. In the US, Sarclisa is approved in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) as a front-line treatment option for adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), based on the IMROZ phase 3 study. On November 14, 2024, the European Medicines Agency (EMA)’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion recommending the approval of Sarclisa-VRd in this patient population. A final decision is expected in the coming months.

Sanofi continues to advance Sarclisa as part of a patient-centric clinical development program, which includes several phase 2 and phase 3 studies across the MM treatment continuum spanning six potential indications. Further clinical studies evaluating a subcutaneous administration method for Sarclisa are ongoing.

In striving to become the number one immunoscience company globally, Sanofi remains committed to advancing oncology innovation. Through focused strategic decisions the company has reshaped and prioritized its pipeline, leveraging its expertise in immunoscience to drive progress. Efforts are centered on difficult-to-treat often rare cancers such as select hematologic malignancies and solid tumors with critical unmet needs, including multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, certain types of lymphomas, as well as gastrointestinal and lung cancers.

Vistagen Announces Positive Results from Exploratory Phase 2A Study of PH284 in Cancer Cachexia

On January 14, 2025 Vistagen (Nasdaq: VTGN), a late clinical-stage company dedicated to pioneering neuroscience based on nose-to-brain neurocircuitry, reported positive results from an exploratory Phase 2A study of PH284 in cancer cachexia (Press release, VistaGen Therapeutics, JAN 14, 2025, View Source [SID1234649729]). PH284 is an investigational pherine nasal spray differentiated from all current treatments for the loss of appetite associated with chronic disorders, such as cancer. In the study, PH284 demonstrated higher mean subjective feeling of hunger as compared to placebo and appeared safe and well-tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to placebo in a population compromised by terminal cancer.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are highly encouraged by the potential of PH284 to improve the quality of life for those challenged by the debilitating impacts of cancer cachexia," stated Shawn Singh, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vistagen. "Loss of appetite from cancer and other illnesses not only negatively impacts overall health and quality of life, but can also reduce the effectiveness of critical therapies, such as chemotherapy in cancer patients. PH284 is our fifth novel investigational pherine, each supported by positive Phase 2 or later clinical data and placebo-like tolerability, underscoring the breadth, diversity and potential of our neuroscience pipeline to address multiple significant unmet needs."

The previously unreported double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory Phase 2A study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intranasal administration of PH284 in female patients diagnosed with cachexia (induced by chronic loss of appetite) due to terminal cancer (n=40). PH284 nasal spray (0.4 µg/50 µL) was administered intranasally, one spray in each nostril (total daily dose = 3.2µg), four times daily before meals (breakfast, mid-morning snack, lunch, and dinner). From Day 1 through Day 4, all subjects were administered placebo 30 minutes prior to each meal. Beginning on Day 5 through Day 11 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either PH284 or placebo.

Efficacy

Patients measured Subjective Feeling of Hunger (SFH) ten minutes before each meal. PH284, as compared to placebo, induced a cumulative effect on mean SFH scores, with scores increasing from breakfast to lunch and lunch to dinner throughout the treatment period. Specifically, prior to dinner on Day 7 of treatment, PH284 subjects reported a 71% improvement in SFH versus baseline, while placebo subjects reported a less than 1% improvement.

Safety and Tolerability

No unusual changes in body weight were observed in either the PH284 or placebo groups, though on average, there was a small gain in body weight for PH284 versus a small loss in placebo. PH284 demonstrated no serious adverse events, and adverse events reported for the PH284 group were similar to those reported in the placebo-treated group. All the adverse events reported were attributed to the underlying medical condition (cancer) and were not deemed to be related to the administration of PH284 or placebo.

About Cachexia

Cachexia, also known as wasting syndrome, is a complex metabolic syndrome that causes a gradual loss of muscle and body weight. Cachexia is associated with chronic diseases like cancer, AIDS, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anorexia nervosa, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and anemias. The current definition of cancer cachexia is a loss of 5% or more of body weight over the preceding six months, accompanied by any of a handful of other symptoms, including fatigue and reduced strength. According to the National Cancer Institute, cachexia is estimated to occur in up to 80% of people with advanced cancer, depending on the type of cancer and how well they respond to cancer treatment. Cachexia is thought to directly cause up to 30% of cancer deaths, often because of heart or respiratory failure related to muscle loss. Maintaining nutritional support and alleviating cachexia has the potential to improve the underlying condition of cancer. Currently, there are no effective medical interventions or approved drugs proven to alleviate cachexia.

This previously unreported Phase 2A exploratory study of PH284 was sponsored by Pherin Pharmaceuticals (Pherin), now a wholly owned subsidiary of Vistagen, and conducted at the National Institute of Oncology (INCAN) and National Institute of Nutrition (INNSZ) in Mexico City, Mexico, in 2005. Vistagen gained access to the results of this study in connection with its acquisition of Pherin in February 2023. Hector Burges, MD, former Director, Institute of Nutrition; Marcos Cano Guardiana, MD, Associate Professor, National Institute of Oncology, Mexico City; and Ricardo Plancarte Sanchez, MD, Head of the Pain Clinic, Institute of Oncology, Mexico City, served as the Principal Investigators of the study.

About PH284

PH284 is an investigational neuroactive pherine nasal spray with a novel, rapid-onset potential mechanism of action (MOA) that is fundamentally differentiated from the MOA of all current treatments for the loss of appetite associated with chronic disorders, such as cancer or heart disease. PH284 is thought to act by regulating olfactory to mediobasal-hypothalamus neural circuits involved in appetite control. PH284 has demonstrated an excellent safety profile in all clinical trials completed to date. Vistagen is currently evaluating the potential path forward for PH284, including an assessment of completed studies and studies we believe are necessary to support a U.S. Investigational New Drug application for potential further Phase 2 clinical development of PH284 for the treatment of cachexia.

FDA Clears Ariceum Therapeutics’ 225Ac-Satoreotide Phase I/II Clinical Study in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer or Merkel Cell Carcinoma

On January 14, 2025 Ariceum Therapeutics (Ariceum), a private biotech company developing radiopharmaceutical products for the diagnosis and treatment of certain hard-to-treat cancers, reported that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared its investigational new drug (IND) application to commence a Phase I/II clinical trial (‘SANTANA-225’) of its proprietary radiolabelled peptide, 225Ac-SSO110, in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) (Press release, Ariceum Therapeutics, JAN 14, 2025, View Source [SID1234649698]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The SANTANA-225 trial is a global, open-label Phase I/II study, that will assess the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and recommended Phase II dose of 225Ac-SSO110 in patients with extensive-stage SCLC or MCC who are on first-line maintenance therapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Ariceum is working with its partners and clinical sites in the US and other countries to commence recruitment of patients in Q1 2025.

Germo Gericke, Chief Medical Officer at Ariceum Therapeutics, said: "This is an important milestone, not only for Ariceum but for the whole field of targeted radionuclide cancer treatments. 225Ac-SSO110 is the first somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) antagonist labelled with Actinium-225 to undergo human trials, providing the optimum combination of a long half-life α particle emitter with a long tumour retention tracer. Based on encouraging clinical data with 177Lu-SSO110 and very promising pre-clinical data of 225Ac-SSO110, we are very optimistic about the potential for patients with difficult to treat cancers."

225Ac-SSO110 is being developed together with its companion patient selection tracer 68Ga-SSO120 as a ‘theranostic pair’ targeted radionuclide treatment of multiple indications expressing SSTR2, such as SCLC, MCC, and other aggressive cancers. Ariceum has recently expanded its global supply agreements for the medical radionuclides Actinium-225 (225Ac) and Lutetium-177 (177Lu), which will be used to radiolabel SSO110.

HyBryte™ Expanded Treatment Continues to Demonstrate Positive Outcomes in Early-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

On January 14, 2025 Soligenix, Inc. (Nasdaq: SNGX) (Soligenix or the Company), a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products to treat rare diseases where there is an unmet medical need, reported an interim update on the open-label, investigator-initiated study (IIS) evaluating extended HyBryte (synthetic hypericin) treatment for up to 12 months in patients with early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) (Press release, Soligenix, JAN 14, 2025, View Source [SID1234649714]). The trial is sponsored by Ellen Kim, MD, Director, Penn Cutaneous Lymphoma Program, Vice Chair of Clinical Operations, Dermatology Department, and Professor of Dermatology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who was a leading enroller in the Phase 3 FLASH (Fluorescent Light Activated Synthetic Hypericin) study for the treatment of early-stage CTCL. To date, nine patients have been enrolled and treated with HyBryte over a time period of up to 54 weeks. Patients have responded positively to HyBryte therapy, with over 70% (5 of the 6 subjects who have completed at least 18 weeks of therapy) already achieving "Treatment Success". Treatment Success is predefined in the study’s protocol as a greater than or equal to 50% improvement in the cumulative mCAILS (modified Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity) score compared to Baseline. Of the five Treatment Successes, three were achieved within the first 12 weeks of treatment, with two patients achieving a "complete response" by 18 weeks. Of the remaining patients, two have recently started the study and two had to drop from the study for logistical reasons (e.g., need to care for an elderly parent), with one showing a substantial improvement (>30%) by their Week 18 visit. In addition, HyBryte appears to be safe and well tolerated in all patients.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"The complete response rate, consistent treatment response and safety profile across multiple clinical studies to date with HyBryte has been exciting to see," noted Dr. Kim, Principal Investigator of the IIS and Lead Investigator of the FLASH2 study. "In the first Phase 3 FLASH study, HyBryte was shown to be efficacious with a benign safety profile compared to the current therapies of steroids, chemotherapeutics and ultraviolet light in this chronic orphan disease. With limited treatment options, especially in the early stages of their disease, CTCL patients are often searching for alternative treatments. In our U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-funded study, initial results evaluating the expanded use of HyBryte in a "real world" treatment setting remain very promising, further supporting and extending results from the previous positive Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. We look forward to continuing to work with the FDA to complete this study while we participate in the confirmatory Phase 3 placebo-controlled FLASH2 study."

"We are pleased with these recent study results and that the FDA is continuing to financially support the HyBryte program, giving patients an opportunity to access the therapy in an open-label setting," stated Christopher J. Schaber, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer of Soligenix. "CTCL is an incredibly difficult to treat orphan disease and remains an area of unmet medical need with a very limited number of safe and effective treatment options. Following the initial Phase 3 FLASH study, which demonstrated the safety and efficacy of shorter courses of HyBryte therapy, we are pleased to see that continuing treatment for longer time periods is resulting in the anticipated improved outcomes for patients. As the body of compelling data continues to grow in support of this novel therapy, we look forward to continuing to work with Dr. Kim on this important study as well as advancing enrollment in the 80-patient confirmatory Phase 3 FLASH2 replication study. We will plan to provide additional updates on the IIS as data becomes available."

The clinical study RW-HPN-MF-01, "Assessment of Treatment with Visible Light Activated Synthetic Hypericin Ointment in Mycosis Fungoides Patients" is designed as an open-label, multicenter clinical trial enrolling approximately 20 patients in the U.S. Patients have the potential to be treated for up to 12 months with twice a week dosing (visible light activation following ointment application by 24 ± 6 hours). The study also allows for potential transition to a "real-world" setting with home-use. The primary endpoint for the study is evaluating the number of treatment successes defined as ≥50% reduction in the cumulative mCAILS score from Baseline to end of the treatment.

About HyBryte

HyBryte (research name SGX301) is a novel, first-in-class, photodynamic therapy utilizing safe, visible light for activation. The active ingredient in HyBryte is synthetic hypericin, a potent photosensitizer that is topically applied to skin lesions that is taken up by the malignant T-cells, and then activated by safe, visible light approximately 24 hours later. The use of visible light in the red-yellow spectrum has the advantage of penetrating more deeply into the skin (much more so than ultraviolet light) and therefore potentially treating deeper skin disease and thicker plaques and lesions. This treatment approach avoids the risk of secondary malignancies (including melanoma) inherent with the frequently employed DNA-damaging drugs and other phototherapy that are dependent on ultraviolet exposure. Combined with photoactivation, hypericin has demonstrated significant anti-proliferative effects on activated normal human lymphoid cells and inhibited growth of malignant T-cells isolated from CTCL patients. In a published Phase 2 clinical study in CTCL, patients experienced a statistically significant (p=0.04) improvement with topical hypericin treatment whereas the placebo was ineffective. HyBryte has received orphan drug and fast track designations from the FDA, as well as orphan designation from the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

The published Phase 3 FLASH trial enrolled a total of 169 patients (166 evaluable) with Stage IA, IB or IIA CTCL. The trial consisted of three treatment cycles. Treatments were administered twice weekly for the first 6 weeks and treatment response was determined at the end of the 8th week of each cycle. In the first double-blind treatment cycle (Cycle 1), 116 patients received HyBryte treatment (0.25% synthetic hypericin) and 50 received placebo treatment of their index lesions. A total of 16% of the patients receiving HyBryte achieved at least a 50% reduction in their lesions (graded using a standard measurement of dermatologic lesions, the CAILS score) compared to only 4% of patients in the placebo group at 8 weeks (p=0.04) during the first treatment cycle (primary endpoint). HyBryte treatment in this cycle was safe and well tolerated.

In the second open-label treatment cycle (Cycle 2), all patients received HyBryte treatment of their index lesions. Evaluation of 155 patients in this cycle (110 receiving 12 weeks of HyBryte treatment and 45 receiving 6 weeks of placebo treatment followed by 6 weeks of HyBryte treatment), demonstrated that the response rate among the 12-week treatment group was 40% (p<0.0001 vs the placebo treatment rate in Cycle 1). Comparison of the 12-week and 6-week treatment responses also revealed a statistically significant improvement (p<0.0001) between the two timepoints, indicating that continued treatment results in better outcomes. HyBryte continued to be safe and well tolerated. Additional analyses also indicated that HyBryte is equally effective in treating both plaque (response 42%, p<0.0001 relative to placebo treatment in Cycle 1) and patch (response 37%, p=0.0009 relative to placebo treatment in Cycle 1) lesions of CTCL, a particularly relevant finding given the historical difficulty in treating plaque lesions in particular.

The third (optional) treatment cycle (Cycle 3) was focused on safety and all patients could elect to receive HyBryte treatment of all their lesions. Of note, 66% of patients elected to continue with this optional compassionate use / safety cycle of the study. Of the subset of patients that received HyBryte throughout all 3 cycles of treatment, 49% of them demonstrated a positive treatment response (p<0.0001 vs patients receiving placebo in Cycle 1). Moreover, in a subset of patients evaluated in this cycle, it was demonstrated that HyBryte is not systemically available, consistent with the general safety of this topical product observed to date. At the end of Cycle 3, HyBryte continued to be well tolerated despite extended and increased use of the product to treat multiple lesions.

Overall safety of HyBryte is a critical attribute of this treatment and was monitored throughout the three treatment cycles (Cycles 1, 2 and 3) and the 6-month follow-up period. HyBryte’s mechanism of action is not associated with DNA damage, making it a safer alternative than currently available therapies, all of which are associated with significant, and sometimes fatal, side effects. Predominantly these include the risk of melanoma and other malignancies, as well as the risk of significant skin damage and premature skin aging. Currently available treatments are only approved in the context of previous treatment failure with other modalities and there is no approved front-line therapy available. Within this landscape, treatment of CTCL is strongly motivated by the safety risk of each product. HyBryte potentially represents the safest available efficacious treatment for CTCL. With very limited systemic absorption, a compound that is not mutagenic and a light source that is not carcinogenic, there is no evidence to date of any potential safety issues.

Following the first Phase 3 study of HyBryte for the treatment of CTCL, the FDA and the EMA indicated that they would require a second successful Phase 3 trial to support marketing approval. With agreement from the EMA on the key design components, the second, confirmatory study, called FLASH2, is expected to be initiated before the end of 2024. This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study that will enroll approximately 80 subjects with early-stage CTCL. The FLASH2 study replicates the double-blind, placebo-controlled design used in the first successful Phase 3 FLASH study that consisted of three 6-week treatment cycles (18 weeks total), with the primary efficacy assessment occurring at the end of the initial 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment cycle (Cycle 1). However, this second study extends the double-blind, placebo-controlled assessment to 18 weeks of continuous treatment (no "between-Cycle" treatment breaks) with the primary endpoint assessment occurring at the end of the 18-week timepoint. In the first Phase 3 study, a treatment response of 49% (p<0.0001 vs patients receiving placebo in Cycle 1) was observed in patients completing 18 weeks (3 cycles) of therapy. In this second study, all important clinical study design components remain the same as in the first FLASH study, including the primary endpoint and key inclusion-exclusion criteria. The extended treatment for a continuous 18 weeks in a single cycle is expected to statistically demonstrate HyBryte’s increased effect over a more prolonged, "real world" treatment course. Given the extensive engagement with the CTCL community, the esteemed Medical Advisory Board and the previous trial experience with this disease, accelerated enrollment in support of this study is anticipated, including the potential to enroll previously identified and treated HyBryte patients from the FLASH study. Discussions with the FDA on an appropriate study design remain ongoing. While collaborative, the agency has expressed a preference for a longer duration comparative study over a placebo-controlled trial. Given the shorter time to potential commercial revenue and the similar trial design to the first FLASH study afforded by the EMA accepted protocol, this study is being initiated. At the same time, discussions with the FDA will continue on potential modifications to the development path to adequately address their feedback.

Additional supportive studies have demonstrated the utility of longer treatment times (Study RW-HPN-MF-01, see above), the lack of significant systemic exposure to hypericin after topical application (Study HPN-CTCL-02) and its relative efficacy and tolerability compared to Valchlor (Study HPN-CTCL-04).

In addition, the FDA awarded an Orphan Products Development grant to support the investigator-initiated study evaluation of HyBryte for expanded treatment in patients with early-stage CTCL, including in the home use setting. The grant, totaling $2.6 million over 4 years, was awarded to the University of Pennsylvania that was a leading enroller in the Phase 3 FLASH study.

About Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)

CTCL is a class of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), a type of cancer of the white blood cells that are an integral part of the immune system. Unlike most NHLs which generally involve B-cell lymphocytes (involved in producing antibodies), CTCL is caused by an expansion of malignant T-cell lymphocytes (involved in cell-mediated immunity) normally programmed to migrate to the skin. These malignant cells migrate to the skin where they form various lesions, typically beginning as patches and may progress to raised plaques and tumors. Mortality is related to the stage of CTCL, with median survival generally ranging from about 12 years in the early stages to only 2.5 years when the disease has advanced. There is currently no cure for CTCL. Typically, CTCL lesions are treated and regress but usually return either in the same part of the body or in new areas.

CTCL constitutes a rare group of NHLs, occurring in about 4% of the more than 1.7 million individuals living with the disease in the U.S. and Europe (European Union and United Kingdom). It is estimated, based upon review of historic published studies and reports and an interpolation of data on the incidence of CTCL that it affects approximately 31,000 individuals in the U.S. (based on SEER data, with approximately 3,200 new cases seen annually) and approximately 38,000 individuals in Europe (based on ECIS prevalence estimates, with approximately 3,800 new cases annually).