Cambrex To Present At The Jefferies 2018 Global Healthcare Conference

On June 1, 2018 Cambrex Corporation (NYSE: CBM), a leading manufacturer of small molecule innovator and generic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), reported that Steven Klosk, President and Chief Executive Officer, will present at the Jefferies 2018 Global Healthcare Conference on June 7, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. EDT in New York City (Press release, Cambrex, JUN 1, 2018, View Source [SID1234527035]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The live audio webcast and slide presentation can be accessed from the Cambrex website at www.cambrex.com in the Investors section under "Webcasts & Presentations", and a replay will be available for 90 days after the live event concludes

Daiichi Sankyo Presents Long-Term Phase 1 Results of Antibody Drug Conjugate DS-8201 in Patients with HER2-Expressing Breast, Gastric and Other Solid Cancers at 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting

On June 1, 2018 Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited (hereafter, Daiichi Sankyo) reported that long-term phase 1 safety and efficacy data for DS-8201, an investigational HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC), in 241 heavily pretreated patients with HER2-expressing breast, gastric and other solid cancers who received recommended expansion doses of 5.4 mg/kg or 6.4 mg/kg, will be presented today during an Oral Abstract Session at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL (Abstract 2501; 2:57 – 3:09 PM CDT) (Press release, Daiichi Sankyo, JUN 1, 2018, View Source [SID1234527018]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Updated preliminary results in a subgroup analysis of 34 patients with heavily pretreated HER2-low-expressing metastatic breast cancer (defined as IHC 2+/ISH- or IHC 1+/ISH- tumors) showed that DS-8201 demonstrated a confirmed overall response rate of 50.0 percent (17/34 patients) and a disease control rate of 85.3 percent (29/34 patients). Preliminary estimates of median duration of response have reached 11 months (95 percent CI: NA) and median progression-free survival has reached 12.9 months (95 percent CI: NA). A total of 14 patients (41.2 percent) were continuing to receive treatment at the time of data cutoff, which was April 18, 2018.

"HER2-targeted treatments historically have not been effective in treating metastatic breast cancer with low levels of HER2 expression," said Hiroji Iwata, MD, PhD, Vice Director and Chief of Breast Oncology at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. "While these results of DS-8201 in the HER2-low-expressing subgroup need to be further confirmed in a larger clinical setting, the preliminary data are intriguing in that we may need to begin rethinking how we approach HER2 as a cell surface target for precision medicine treatment in metastatic breast cancer."

In an updated preliminary subgroup analysis in 99 efficacy evaluable patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer pretreated with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) (as well as trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the majority of cases), DS-8201 demonstrated a confirmed overall response rate of 54.5 percent (54/99 patients) and a disease control rate of 93.9 percent (93/99 patients). Median duration of response and median progression-free survival have not yet been reached. Out of 111 patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received at least one dose of DS-8201, 65 (55.1 percent) were continuing to receive treatment at the time of data cut off.

Updated overall safety data across all subgroups of the phase 1 study were reported. The most common adverse events (>30 percent, any Grade), included nausea (68.9 percent), decreased appetite (55.6 percent), alopecia (36.1 percent), vomiting (34.9 percent) and anemia (32.0 percent). Grade 3 adverse events occurring in ≥10 percent of patients included decreased neutrophil count (15.4 percent), anemia (14.9 percent), decreased white blood cell count (12.4 percent) and decreased platelet count (10.4 percent). Twenty-three patients (9.5 percent) discontinued treatment due to adverse events, which included ten (10) Grade 5 adverse events: pneumonitis (4), disease progression (2), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (1), ileus (1), pneumonia aspiration (1) and pneumonia (1). All reported or suspected cases of ILD or pneumonitis currently are under review by an independent ILD adjudication committee.

"These updated results further support our broad and comprehensive development program underway exploring the potential of DS-8201 in HER2-low-expressing breast cancer, which represents about half of all breast cancers, as well as in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, where unmet treatment needs remain," said Antoine Yver, MD, MSc, Executive Vice President and Global Head, Oncology Research and Development, Daiichi Sankyo. "Our pivotal phase 2 trial in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is underway, and we are planning phase 3 trials in HER2-low-expressing and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in order to determine whether the smart delivery of chemotherapy with DS-8201 may be an effective treatment option against breast tumors that express varying levels of HER2 as a cell surface antigen. A similar biological paradigm is being tested in our other ongoing phase 2 studies of DS-8201 in gastric and colorectal cancer."

HER2-Expressing Gastric Cancer and Other Solid Cancer Subgroup Analyses

Updated preliminary results of two additional subgroup analyses were reported in addition to the two breast cancer subgroups. In the subgroup of 44 patients with HER2-expressing (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/

ISH-) gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma previously treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy, DS-8201 demonstrated a confirmed overall response rate of 43.2 percent (19/44 patients) and a disease control rate of 79.5 percent (35/44 patients). Preliminary estimates of median duration of response has reached 7.0 months (95 percent CI: NA) and median progression-free survival has reached 5.6 months (95 percent CI: 3.0, 8.3).

In an updated preliminaryanalysis in 31 evaluable patients with other HER2-expressing solid tumors such as colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer, DS-8201 demonstrated a confirmed overall response rate of 38.7 percent (12/31 patients) and a disease control rate of 83.9 percent (26/31 patients). Preliminary estimates of median duration of response has reached 12.9 months (95 percent CI: 2.8, 12.9) and median progression-free survival has reached 12.1 months (95% CI: 2.7, 14.1).

Unmet Need in HER2-Expressing Breast and Gastric Cancer

About one in five breast and gastric cancers overexpress HER2, a tyrosine kinase receptor growth-promoting protein found on the surface of some cancer cells, which is associated with aggressive disease.1,2 To be considered HER2-positive, tumor cancer cells are usually tested by one of two methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).1,3 IHC test results are reported as: 0, IHC 1+, IHC 2+ or IHC 3+.1,3 A finding of IHC 3+ is considered HER2-positive.1,3 A finding of IHC 2+ is borderline and typically is confirmed by a positive FISH test.1,3

Several unmet needs remain today in HER2-expressing metastatic breast cancer. Many HER2-positive tumors advance to the point where no currently approved HER2-targeting treatment continues to control the disease, and there is no current standard of care for HER2-positive tumors after treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T-DM1.4 Additionally, there are no anti-HER2 therapies indicated for HER2 low-expressing tumors (IHC 2+/FISH- or IHC 1+).

HER2-expressing gastric cancer also is an area of unmet medical need as advances in the treatment of the disease have been limited, largely due to its genetic complexity and heterogeneity.5 Currently, there are no approved HER2-targeting therapy options for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer after treatment with trastuzumab.

About the DS-8201 Phase 1 Study

The open-label, two-part phase 1 study is currently evaluating DS-8201 in patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that are refractory or intolerant to standard treatment, or for whom no standard treatment is available. The primary objective of the dose escalation phase of the study was to assess the safety and tolerability of DS-8201 and determine the maximum tolerated dose. Data from this part of the study were published in the Lancet Oncology.6

In the dose expansion part of the phase 1 study, DS-8201 is given to patients with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer and gastric cancer, HER2-low-expressing breast cancer and other HER2-expressing or mutant solid tumors. Patient enrollment in the two breast cancer cohorts and the HER2-expressing solid tumors cohort is ongoing in the U.S. and Japan. For more information about the study, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

About DS-8201

DS-8201 is the lead product in the investigational ADC Franchise of the Daiichi Sankyo Cancer Enterprise. ADCs are targeted cancer medicines that deliver cytotoxic chemotherapy ("payload") to cancer cells via a linker attached to a monoclonal antibody that binds to a specific target expressed on cancer cells. Designed using Daiichi Sankyo’s proprietary ADC technology, DS-8201 is a smart chemotherapy comprised of a humanized HER2 antibody attached to a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor payload by a tetrapeptide-based linker. It is designed to target and deliver chemotherapy inside cancer cells and reduce systemic exposure to the cytotoxic payload (or chemotherapy) compared to the way chemotherapy is commonly delivered.

DS-8201 is currently in pivotal phase 2 clinical development for HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer resistant or refractory to T-DM1 (DESTINY-Breast01) in North America, Europe and Asia; pivotal phase 2 development for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer resistant or refractory to trastuzumab (DESTINY-Gastric01) in Japan and South Korea; phase 2 development for HER2-expressing advanced colorectal cancer in North America, Europe and Japan; phase 2 development for unresectable and/or metastatic non-squamous HER2-overexpressing or HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in North America, Europe and Japan; and phase 1 development for other HER2-expressing advanced/unresectable or metastatic solid tumors in the U.S. and Japan.

DS-8201 has been granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have been treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab and have disease progression after ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), and Fast Track designation for the treatment of HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in patients who have progressed after prior treatment with HER2-targeted therapies including T-DM1 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). DS-8201 has also been granted SAKIGAKE Designation by the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

DS-8201 is an investigational agent that has not been approved for any indication in any country. Safety and efficacy have not been established.

Results of Phase III OPTIMISMM Study Presented at ASCO 2018 Showed the PVd Triplet Improved PFS in Early Lines of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

On June 1, 2018 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ:CELG) reported results from the OPTIMISMM study, a phase III, randomized, open-label, international clinical study of the investigational combination regimen of POMALYST (pomalidomide), bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had received at least one prior treatment including lenalidomide (Press release, Celgene, JUN 1, 2018, View Source [SID1234527036]). The results were presented at the 54th Annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Scientific Sessions (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago, Illinois on June 1-5, 2018.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

OPTIMISMM evaluated the efficacy and safety of POMALYST/IMNOVID (pomalidomide) plus bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone (PVd) versus bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with early RRMM (1-3 prior lines of therapy). It is the only phase III trial to report results with a triplet combination in patients who have all received prior lenalidomide therapy. With lenalidomide becoming a standard of care, this represents a patient population for which there is a growing unmet medical need.

An analysis of the results found that the treatment with PVd resulted in significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and an earlier, deeper, more durable response in these patients compared to Vd treatment. The study, which included a high percentage of patients refractory to lenalidomide (71% in the PVd arm, 69% in the Vd arm), met its primary endpoint of PFS. Those receiving PVd achieved a statistically significant longer PFS than those in the Vd treatment arm (11.20 months vs. 7.10 months, respectively [P= < .0001, HR 0.61; 95% CI: (0.49-0.77)]), reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 39% in the PVd arm. The PFS benefit was observed in the following subgroups of patients: LEN-refractory, LEN-nonrefractory, prior PI exposure or high-risk cytogenetics. Overall response rate (ORR), one of the study’s secondary endpoints, was also significantly higher in the PVd treatment arm, compared to those receiving Vd (82.2% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.001). Additionally, time to treatment response was longer in the PVd arm (0.9 months PVd vs. 1.4 months Vd), complete response was higher in the PVd arm (15.7% PVd vs. 4.0% Vd) and those receiving PVd experienced a longer duration of response than those in the Vd arm (13.7 months PVd vs. 10.9 months Vd.)

In an exploratory sub-group analysis, patients who had received one prior line of therapy reported longer PFS (20.73 months in PVd arm (n=40) vs. 11.63 months in Vd arm (n=41)) and ORR (90.1% in PVd arm vs. 54.8% in Vd arm) with a 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in the PVd treatment arm compared with Vd. Other secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety.

"In the early relapse setting, there remains a need for a deeper understanding of potential treatment options, and in particular for patients who have received prior lenalidomide-based therapy. These are the first phase III clinical findings to report a significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival improvement in patients who have previously received lenalidomide, a majority of whom are lenalidomide refractory," said Paul Richardson, MD, Clinical Program Leader and Director of Clinical Research, Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were neutropenia (PVd: 42% vs. Vd: 9%), infections (PVd: 31% vs. Vd: 18%) and thrombocytopenia (PVd: 27% vs. Vd: 29%.) Rates of grade 3 or 4 deep vein thrombosis in the PVd vs. Vd arms were 0.7% vs. 0.4% and rates of grade 3 or 4 pulmonary embolism in PVd vs. Vd were 4.0% vs. 0.4%. No events were fatal. SPMs occurred in 3.2% (2.7 per 100 person years) of patients treated with PVd and 1.5% (1.2 per 100 person years) of patients treated with Vd. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was progressive disease.

"The results of the OPTIMISMM trial continue to bolster the growing body of research into combination regimens based on the foundation of our IMiD therapies," said Nadim Ahmed, President of Hematology and Oncology for Celgene. "We are excited by the findings, as they illustrate the potential for a pomalidomide-based triplet regimen to be used earlier in the treatment course. The study also included patients who received PVd immediately following progression after lenalidomide treatment, a growing and clinically relevant patient population for which no phase III data were available until now."

Pomalyst plus dexamethasone in combination with bortezomib is not approved in any country for any use.

ABOUT OPTIMISMM

OPTIMISMM is the first phase III trial to compare the efficacy and safety of PVd vs. Vd as an early line of therapy in patients with RRMM (with 1-3 prior lines of therapy) and prior lenalidomide (LEN) exposure, including LEN-refractory patients. The study was a multi-center, international, open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of a POMALYST (lenalidomide), bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone (PVd) treatment regimen to a bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone (Vd) treatment regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

This global study evaluated 559 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had received up to three prior lines of therapy, including two or more cycles of lenalidomide treatment, who had an ECOG score of PS ≤ 2. Prior treatment with bortezomib was allowed, except for patients whose disease progressed while on a regimen containing bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 twice weekly dosing. Patients were stratified based on age (≤ 75 years old vs > 75 years old), number of prior antimyeloma regimens (1 vs. > 1), and β2-microglobulin levels ( < 3.5 mg/L vs ≥ 3.5 to ≤ 5.5 mg/L vs > 5.5 mg/L) at screening. The median age of the patients was 67 years in the PVd group and 68 years in the Vd group.

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive PVd or Vd. In 21-day cycles, patients received POMALYST 4 mg/d on days 1-14 (PVd arm only); bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of cycles 1-8 and on days 1 and 8 of cycles 9 and beyond; and dexamethasone 20 mg/d (10 mg if aged > 75 years) on the days of and after receiving bortezomib treatment.

About POMALYST

Indication

POMALYST (pomalidomide) is a thalidomide analogue indicated, in combination with dexamethasone, for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy.

Important Safety Information

WARNING: EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY and VENOUS AND ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLISM

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
POMALYST is contraindicated in pregnancy. POMALYST is a thalidomide analogue. Thalidomide is a known human teratogen that causes severe birth defects or embryo-fetal death. In females of reproductive potential, obtain 2 negative pregnancy tests before starting POMALYST treatment.
Females of reproductive potential must use 2 forms of contraception or continuously abstain from heterosexual sex during and for 4 weeks after stopping POMALYST treatment.
POMALYST is only available through a restricted distribution program called POMALYST REMS.

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infarction, and stroke occur in patients with multiple myeloma treated with POMALYST. Prophylactic antithrombotic measures were employed in clinical trials. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended, and the choice of regimen should be based on assessment of the patient’s underlying risk factors.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Pregnancy: POMALYST can cause fetal harm and is contraindicated in females who are pregnant. If POMALYST is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential risk to a fetus.
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity & Females of Reproductive Potential: See Boxed WARNINGS
Males: Pomalidomide is present in the semen of patients receiving the drug. Males must always use a latex or synthetic condom during any sexual contact with females of reproductive potential while taking POMALYST and for up to 4 weeks after discontinuing POMALYST, even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy. Males must not donate sperm.
Blood Donation: Patients must not donate blood during treatment with POMALYST and for 4 weeks following discontinuation of POMALYST therapy because the blood might be given to a pregnant female patient whose fetus must not be exposed to POMALYST.
POMALYST REMS Program: See Boxed WARNINGS
Prescribers and pharmacies must be certified with the POMALYST REMS program by enrolling and complying with the REMS requirements; pharmacies must only dispense to patients who are authorized to receive POMALYST. Patients must sign a Patient-Physician Agreement Form and comply with REMS requirements; female patients of reproductive potential who are not pregnant must comply with the pregnancy testing and contraception requirements and males must comply with contraception requirements.
Further information about the POMALYST REMS program is available at www.CelgeneRiskManagement.com or by telephone at 1-888-423-5436.
Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism: See Boxed WARNINGS. Patients with known risk factors, including prior thrombosis, may be at greater risk, and actions should be taken to try to minimize all modifiable factors (e.g., hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking). Thromboprophylaxis is recommended, and the choice of regimen should be based on assessment of the patient’s underlying risk factors.
Increased Mortality with Pembrolizumab: In clinical trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of pembrolizumab to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials.
Hematologic Toxicity: Neutropenia (46%) was the most frequently reported Grade 3/4 adverse reaction in patients taking POMALYST in clinical trials, followed by anemia and thrombocytopenia. Monitor complete blood counts weekly for the first 8 weeks and monthly thereafter. Patients may require dose interruption and/or modification.
Hepatotoxicity: Hepatic failure, including fatal cases, has occurred in patients treated with POMALYST. Elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase and bilirubin have also been observed in patients treated with POMALYST. Monitor liver function tests monthly. Stop POMALYST upon elevation of liver enzymes. After return to baseline values, treatment at a lower dose may be considered.
Severe Cutaneous Reactions Including Hypersensitivity Reactions: Angioedema and severe cutaneous reactions including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) have been reported. DRESS may present with a cutaneous reaction (such as rash or exfoliative dermatitis), eosinophilia, fever, and/or lymphadenopathy with systemic complications such as hepatitis, nephritis, pneumonitis, myocarditis, and/or pericarditis. Discontinue POMALYST for angioedema, skin exfoliation, bullae, or any other severe cutaneous reactions such as SJS, TEN or DRESS, and do not resume therapy.
Dizziness and Confusional State: In patients taking POMALYST in clinical trials, 14% experienced dizziness (1% Grade 3 or 4) and 7% a confusional state (3% Grade 3 or 4). Instruct patients to avoid situations where dizziness or confusional state may be a problem and not to take other medications that may cause dizziness or confusional state without adequate medical advice.
Neuropathy: In patients taking POMALYST in clinical trials, 18% experienced neuropathy (2% Grade 3 in one trial) and 12% peripheral neuropathy.
Second Primary Malignancies: Cases of acute myelogenous leukemia have been reported in patients receiving POMALYST as an investigational therapy outside of multiple myeloma.
Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS): TLS may occur in patients treated with POMALYST. Patients at risk are those with high tumor burden prior to treatment. These patients should be monitored closely and appropriate precautions taken.
ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse reactions for POMALYST (≥30%) included fatigue and asthenia, neutropenia, anemia, constipation, nausea, diarrhea, dyspnea, upper-respiratory tract infections, back pain, and pyrexia.

In the phase III trial, nearly all patients treated with POMALYST + low-dose dex experienced at least one adverse reaction (99%). Adverse reactions (≥15% in the POMALYST + low-dose dex arm and ≥2% higher than control) included neutropenia (51.3%), fatigue and asthenia (46.7%), upper respiratory tract infection (31%), thrombocytopenia (29.7%), pyrexia (26.7%), dyspnea (25.3%), diarrhea (22%), constipation (21.7%), back pain (19.7%), cough (20%), pneumonia (19.3%), bone pain (18%), edema peripheral (17.3%), peripheral neuropathy (17.3%), muscle spasms (15.3%), and nausea (15%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (≥15% in the POMALYST + low-dose dex arm and ≥1% higher than control) included neutropenia (48.3%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and pneumonia (15.7%).

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Avoid concomitant use of POMALYST with strong inhibitors of CYP1A2. Consider alternative treatments. If a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor must be used, reduce POMALYST dose by 50%.

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy: See Boxed WARNINGS. If pregnancy does occur during treatment, immediately discontinue the drug and refer patient to an obstetrician/gynecologist experienced in reproductive toxicity for further evaluation and counseling. There is a POMALYST pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in females exposed to POMALYST during pregnancy as well as female partners of male patients who are exposed to POMALYST. This registry is also used to understand the root cause for the pregnancy. Report any suspected fetal exposure to POMALYST to the FDA via the MedWatch program at 1-800-FDA-1088 and also to Celgene Corporation at 1-888-423-5436.
Lactation: There is no information regarding the presence of pomalidomide in human milk, the effects of POMALYST on the breastfed child, or the effects of POMALYST on milk production. Pomalidomide was excreted in the milk of lactating rats. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for adverse reactions in a breastfed child from POMALYST, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with POMALYST.
Pediatric Use: Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pediatric patients.
Geriatric Use: No dosage adjustment is required for POMALYST based on age. Patients > 65 years of age were more likely than patients ≤65 years of age to experience pneumonia.
Renal Impairment: Reduce POMALYST dose by 25% in patients with severe renal impairment requiring dialysis. Take dose of POMALYST following hemodialysis on hemodialysis days.
Hepatic Impairment: Reduce POMALYST dose by 25% in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment and 50% in patients with severe hepatic impairment.
Smoking Tobacco: Advise patients that smoking may reduce the efficacy of POMALYST. Cigarette smoking reduces the AUC of pomalidomide by 32% by CYP1A2 induction.
Please see full Prescribing Information, including Boxed WARNINGS.

About Celgene’s Immunomodulatory Drugs

Immunomodulatory Drugs (IMiDs) are Celgene’s proprietary small molecule, orally available compounds for the treatment of some blood cancers. IMiD agents are hypothesized to have multiple mechanisms of action. They have been found to increase activation and proliferation of T cells, and proliferation of the IL-2 protein and activity of CD8+ effector T cells. IMiD agents have also been found to affect the stimulation and expression of natural killer (NK) cells, working within the environment of the cell to stimulate the immune system to attack the cancer cells, as well as attack the cancer cells directly. In addition to immunomodulatory properties, IMiD agents are hypothesized to have tumoricidal and antiangiogenic activity. Celgene’s portfolio of IMiD agents have become a foundation of multiple myeloma research, with a growing number of studies exploring these compounds as combination partners across a range of settings of the disease.

Celldex Therapeutics to Present at the Jefferies 2018 Global Healthcare Conference

On June 1, 2018 Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLDX) reported that Anthony Marucci, Co-founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, will present a corporate overview at the Jefferies 2018 Global Healthcare Conference on June 7, 2018 at 3:00 p.m. EDT in New York (Press release, Celldex Therapeutics, JUN 1, 2018, View Source [SID1234527037]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The live webcast will be available on the "Events & Presentations" page of the "Investors & Media" section of the Celldex website. A replay will be available for seven days following the event.

Roche to present data for TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) from across its genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy programme at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting

On June 1, 2018 Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) reported that data from across its genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancer immunotherapy development programme will be presented during the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting from 1-5 June in Chicago, IL, United States (Press release, Hoffmann-La Roche, JUN 1, 2018, View Source [SID1234527020]). Data to be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2018 demonstrate the potential of the combination of TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) in first-line advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (mHCC), as well as show initial data for TECENTRIQ monotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment in early stage urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are pleased to present positive Patient-Reported Outcomes data from the Phase III IMmotion151 study, which demonstrate the quality of life benefits that TECENTRIQ and Avastin potentially bring to people living with advanced kidney cancer," said Sandra Horning, M.D., Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. "We will also present promising early data for TECENTRIQ and Avastin in advanced or metastatic liver cancer, where there is a significant need for new therapies. Data from these two studies provide further evidence to support the potential of this unique combination across multiple settings."

Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) collected in the Phase III IMmotion151 study investigating the combination of TECENTRIQ and Avastin as a first-line treatment for mRCC, compared with a current standard of care sunitinib, were evaluated in the overall study population and show:

Patients receiving the combination reported a better health-related quality of life (HRQol) overall when compared with sunitinib. HRQol evaluates the overall impact of disease and treatment on patient’s quality of life in terms of disease related symptoms, treatment side effects and function/well-being
Patients receiving the combination reported lower impact of symptoms on day-to-day life, when compared with patients receiving sunitinib
The combination of TECENTRIQ and Avastin markedly increased the time before symptoms meaningfully impacted day-to-day life compared to sunitinib (median time to deterioration: 11.3 vs 4.3 months; HR=0.56; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.68)
Patients receiving the combination had milder and more stable symptom severity overall and a clinically meaningful reduction in the five most severe disease symptoms
Patients completed questionnaires on Days 1 and 22 of each 6-week cycle, at the end of treatment
Earlier this year, Roche announced that IMmotion151 met its co-primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) when comparing the TECENTRIQ and Avastin combination with sunitinib for people whose disease expressed the PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) protein. The safety profile was consistent with previously reported data, with a discontinuation of the combination regimen only occurring in 5% of the patients and a lower rate of Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events with the TECENTRIQ and Avastin combination (40%) than with sunitinib alone (54%). 16% of patients required use of systemic steroids within 30 days of the onset of an immune-related AE.

Further data for TECENTRIQ and Avastin will be presented from an ongoing Phase Ib study evaluating the combination as a first-line treatment in untreated advanced, unresectable or metastatic HCC. In the safety evaluable population (n=43), 28% patients (n=12) experienced Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related Grade 5 adverse events were observed. No new safety signals were identified beyond the established safety profiles for the individual medicines. After a median follow-up of 10.3 months, responses (investigator assessed per RECIST v1.1) were seen in 14 (61%) of 23 efficacy evaluable patients and regardless of disease etiology (cause), region (Asia or US), baseline alpha-fetoprotein levels or spread of tumour beyond the liver. Assessment by independent review facility (IRF) assessed per RECIST v1.1 revealed a response rate of 65% (15 out of 23 patients). Median progression free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) have not yet been reached after a median follow-up of 10.3 months; results will be presented at a future medical congress when updated data from an expanded cohort are available. A larger randomised Phase III study in untreated locally advanced or metastatic HCC, IMbrave150, evaluating the combination of TECENTRIQ and Avastin versus the standard of care sorafenib, is underway and recruiting patients.

In early stage bladder cancer, results from an interim analysis of a Phase II investigator-initiated study (ABACUS) evaluating neoadjuvant TECENTRIQ monotherapy in 68 evaluable patients with muscle invasive disease will also be presented. Topline results demonstrated a clinically meaningful pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 18 / 62 (29%). Of the pCR patients, 17% had pT3/4 disease at baseline. Treatment-related Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 12% of patients while Grade 3-4 surgical complications occurred in 31% of patients. The trial aims to test the efficacy of preoperative TECENTRIQ and includes extensive biomarker work on samples from these patients.

The results of the three studies will be presented at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting on Sunday 3 June 2018.

About the IMmotion151 study
IMmotion151 is a Phase III multicentre, randomised, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TECENTRIQ and Avastin versus sunitinib in people with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have not received prior systemic active or experimental therapy. It enrolled 915 people globally who were randomised 1:1 to receive TECENTRIQ and Avastin, or sunitinib alone.

People in the TECENTRIQ and Avastin arm received TECENTRIQ at a fixed dose of 1200 milligrams (mg) and Avastin at a dose of 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. People in the sunitinib arm received sunitinib 50 mg orally, once daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity.

The co-primary endpoints were PFS, as determined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) in people whose tumours expressed PD-L1 (expression ≥1 percent on immune cells [IC]), and OS in the overall study population (intention-to-treat, ITT). PD-L1 expression was prospectively assessed using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) test (SP142) developed by Roche Tissue Diagnostics. Secondary endpoints included OS in people whose tumours expressed PD-L1, PFS as determined by an Independent Review Facility (IRF) according to RECIST v1.1, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR), change from baseline in symptom interference and symptom severity as determined by M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), and change from baseline in health-related quality of life as determined by European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Scores. PROs were evaluated as secondary and exploratory endpoints to document patient perspective on overall clinical benefit for each treatment.

About the Phase Ib study in HCC (NCT02715531)
This Phase Ib study evaluates the safety and clinical activity of the combination of TECENTRIQ and Avastin in people with untreated advanced, unresectable or metastatic HCC. Patients received TECENTRIQ (1200 mg) + Avastin (15 mg/kg) IV every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability as well as the efficacy of the combination. The primary efficacy endpoint is investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary efficacy endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and time to progression (TTP) per RECIST v1.1; as well as overall survival (OS).

About IMbrave150
IMbrave150 is a Phase III, multicentre, randomised open-label study randomising approximately 480 patients with untreated advanced, unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma 2:1 to receive TECENTRIQ in combination with Avastin or sorafenib. TECENTRIQ will be administered by IV, 1200mg on day 1 of each 21 day cycle and Avastin will be administered by IV, 15mg/kg on day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Sorafenib will be administered by mouth, 400mg twice per day, on days 1-21 of each 21 day cycle. Patients will receive the combination and the control arm until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit as determined by the investigator. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and investigator-assessed objective response rate. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), duration of response (DOR) and independent review facility (IRF) assessed responses.

About the ABACUS study
ABACUS is an investigator-initiated, open-label, international, multicentre, phase II trial for patients with histologically confirmed (T2-T4a) transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. The trial aims to test the efficacy of preoperative TECENTRIQ and includes extensive biomarker work on samples from these patients. Patients received two 3-weekly cycles of TECENTRIQ prior to cystectomy. Following cystectomy, patients were followed up for safety, survival, and disease data. Co-primary endpoints are (1) efficacy of atezolizumab prior to cystectomy assessed as pathological complete response rate and (2) immune parameters. Secondary endpoints include safety and efficacy based on anti-tumour effect by radiological response.

About TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab)
TECENTRIQ is a monoclonal antibody designed to bind with a protein called PD-L1 expressed on tumour cells and tumour-infiltrating immune cells, blocking its interactions with both PD-1 and B7.1 receptors. By inhibiting PD-L1, TECENTRIQ may enable the activation of T cells. TECENTRIQ has the potential to be used as a foundational combination partner with cancer immunotherapies, targeted medicines and various chemotherapies across a broad range of cancers.

TECENTRIQ is already approved in the European Union, United States and more than 70 countries for people with previously treated metastatic NSCLC and for people with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who are not eligible for cisplatin chemotherapy, or who have had disease progression during or following platinum-containing therapy.

About the TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) and Avastin (bevacizumab) combination
There is a strong scientific rationale to support combining TECENTRIQ and Avastin. The TECENTRIQ and Avastin regimen may enhance the potential of the immune system to combat a broad range of cancers. Avastin, in addition to its established anti-angiogenic effects, may further enhance TECENTRIQ’s ability to restore anti-cancer immunity, by inhibiting VEGF-related immunosuppression, promoting T-cell tumour infiltration and enabling priming and activation of T-cell responses against tumour antigens.

About renal cell carcinoma
Kidney cancer remains one of the most common cancers in the world, accounting for over 140,000 deaths worldwide each year,1 with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounting for approximately 90% of all cases.2 Over 300,000 people are diagnosed with RCC every year and currently only about 1 in 10 people are alive beyond 5 years following diagnosis of metastatic disease.3

RCC occurs when abnormal cells develop in the tissue of the kidneys, specifically in the small tubes (also known as tubules) where our blood is filtered.4 Typically, RCC is a single tumour in one kidney but, in rare cases, there can be multiple tumours, which can occur in one or both kidneys.5

Despite recent progress in the field of kidney cancer, treatment options for people with the disease remains limited.

About hepatocellular carcinoma
HCC is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and has a very high fatality rate.6 Globally, it’s the fifth most common cancer in men and the seventh most common cancer among women, with over half a million new cases diagnosed annually.6 HCC develops predominantly in those patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis B or C,6 and typically presents at an advanced stage where there are limited treatment options.7

About urothelial carcinoma
Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, with 430,000 new cases diagnosed in 2012, and it results in approximately 165,000 deaths globally each year. Men are three times more likely to suffer from bladder cancer, compared with women,8 and the disease is three times more common in developed countries than in less developed countries.9 There are three types of bladder cancer: transitional cell carcinoma (which begins in cells in the innermost tissue layer), squamous cell carcinoma (which begins in squamous cells) and adenocarcinoma (which begins in glandular cells in the lining of the bladder). Most cancers that form in the bladder are transitional cell carcinomas.10