Lilly buys migraine biotech CoLucid, and the drug it outlicensed, for $960M

On January 18, 2017 Eli Lilly says it will spend nearly $1 billion to buy out CoLucid Pharmaceuticals and get its hands on its late-stage acute migraine candidate, which Lilly outlicensed to the company back in 2005 (Press release, FierceBiotech, JAN 18, 2017, View Source [SID1234517455]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The all-cash transaction works out to $46.50 a share, after trading at $34.90 at end of play yesterday.
Lilly said in a statement that this will "enhance its existing portfolio in pain management for migraine," while also adding a potential near-term launch to its late-stage pipeline.

This drug, lasmiditan, is an oral 5-HT1F agonist and has already finished the first of two pivotal phase 3 trials.
A data readout for the second test, known as SPARTAN, is expected in the second half of 2017. "If this trial is positive, submission of lasmiditan for U.S. regulatory approval could occur in 2018," the pair say.

Lasmiditan was originally discovered at Lilly and was outlicensed to CoLucid 12 years ago. "At the time lasmiditan was out-licensed, pain management was not a strategic area of focus for Lilly," the company said, but added that it has "since reorganized its research and development efforts to focus on migraine as part of its emerging therapeutic area of pain."

The Big Pharma figures that as many as 36 million people suffer from migraine in the U.S. and sees lasmiditan, if approved, as being a first-in-class therapy to treat migraine through a new mechanism of action, and without vasoconstriction.

"This could be desirable in migraine patients who have, or are at risk for, cardiovascular disease, as well as those who are dissatisfied with their current therapies," it notes.

This bulks out Lilly’s pain pipeline, which includes galcanezumab, currently in phase 3 to help stop migraines and cluster headaches.

And there’s tanezumab, which is being studied in partnership with Pfizer, for the treatment of multiple pain indications, including osteoarthritis, lower back and cancer pain.

"We are excited that lasmiditan will be back at Lilly, where it was originally discovered, for the conclusion of phase 3 development and potential commercialization," said Thomas Mathers, CoLucid’s CEO. "We are proud of the work that CoLucid has done to develop lasmiditan, and we believe Lilly’s expertise in pain and commitment to innovation are a natural fit to potentially bring this medicine to patients."

CoLucid went public with a $55 million IPO in 2015 at $10 per share, with major venture investors including Care Capital, Novo A/S, Domain Partners, TVM Life Science Ventures and Trialthlon Medical Ventures, as well as Pappas Ventures, which founded the company back in 2005.

In the more than 2,200-patient phase 3 SAMURAI study, posted last year, the drug met the primary endpoint of efficacy for low-dose and high-dose lasmiditan versus placebo based on migraine headache pain two hours after dosing. It also met the secondary endpoint of freedom from the most bothersome migraine symptom two hours after dosing.

The second 2,200-plus patient pivotal trial, SPARTAN, is evaluating three doses, with an additional lower-dose arm but with the same primary and secondary endpoints as the SAMURAI trial. It’s expected to examine a patient subgroup of those with cardiovascular risk factors, stable cardiovascular disease or known coronary artery disease.

IMMUNOMEDICS HIGHLIGHTS EXPANDED PIPELINE POSITIONING COMPANY FOR SUSTAINED VALUE CREATION

On January 18, 2017 Immunomedics reported additional value-creation inflection points in its robust pipeline in connection with the Company’s Investor R&D Day held at The Roosevelt Hotel in New York City (Filing, 8-K, Immunomedics, JAN 18, 2017, View Source [SID1234517459]). In addition to announcing new data for sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), Immunomedics detailed the preclinical and clinical progress it has achieved in advancing IMMU-114, IMMU130, IMMU-140 and its immune-oncology program, which the Company believes will result in near- and long-term value creation for stockholders.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"While IMMU-132 is the key near-term driver of value creation for Immunomedics stockholders, we are making significant progress in advancing the rest of our robust pipeline with the goal of sustained value creation," said Cynthia L. Sullivan, President and Chief Executive Officer. "We are on track to achieve numerous other milestones to position these assets for future monetization in parallel with our efforts to achieve the value potential of IMMU-132."

To date, the Company has:

● Advanced IMMU-114 in clinical trials and presented results at peer-reviewed clinical meetings (2015 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) and 2016 Pan Pacific Lymphoma Conference);

● Completed the Phase 2 trial of its solid cancer ADC, labetuzumab govitecan (IMMU-130), in patients with advanced, metastatic, colorectal cancer;
● Consulted with the FDA on the Phase 3 registration trial for IMMU-130 in patients with advanced, refractory, colorectal cancer;

● Advanced the Company’s development of IMMU-140, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) using the Company’s proprietary SN-38 conjugation technology together with the IMMU-114 humanized antibody, presenting first preclinical results at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper); and

● Continued to establish, expand and explore our robust pipeline of potential treatments, including a novel, proprietary methodology to harness the patient’s own immune system to treat cancer with bispecific antibodies retargeting T cells (immuno-oncology program).
2
CLINICAL PROGRAMS:
IMMU-130
This ADC contains the exact same linker + drug as IMMU-132, but employs a different antibody, labetuzumab. The antibody recognizes carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, or CEACAM5), which is elevated in over 85% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Enrollment into a Phase 2, single-arm study in about 91 patients with mCRC has been completed. Promising activity in heavily-pretreated patients (median five prior therapies and all treated with irinotecan) were reported. In patients receiving the 10 mg/kg dose on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 months. This compares favorably to results with regorafenib, which had a 3rd line median PFS of 1.9 months and an OS of 6.4 months. Although there were no partial responses (PRs) with IMMU-130 at this dose level/schedule, 87% of these patients had stable disease (SD). Immunomedics states that it will continue to follow patients in this Phase 2 study and will continue discussions with the regulatory authorities on the design of a future Phase 3 clinical trial.

Epratuzumab
To date, epratuzumab (humanized anti-CD22 antibody) has been administered to more than 2,000 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL), and lupus. Clinical studies showed that it could be combined with rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, resulting in improved efficacy, which is the rationale leading to the Company developing bispecific antibodies against both CD22 and CD20 (discussed below). Currently, epratuzumab is being evaluated in a Phase 3 clinical trial in pediatric patients with ALL. This long-term, randomized study will enroll 612 patients, with the primary endpoint of PFS at four years. The IntReALL consortium, based in Berlin, Germany, is sponsoring this study, supported by a program grant from the European Union. The Company provides epratuzumab under a reimbursement program for the manufacturing costs.

Veltuzumab
The Company’s 2nd generation (humanized) anti-CD20 antibody, veltuzumab, was constructed with one amino acid difference in the binding site compared to rituximab, and has different framework regions due to humanization. Because of this structural change, functional difference compared to rituximab were observed during development, including veltuzumab’s binding to CD20 3-times longer, increased complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), and improved survival in lymphoma xenograft models when compared to rituximab. This CD20 antibody has been formulated in subcutaneous (sc) dosing and has been evaluated in patients with NHL and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and has been administered under compassionate use in patients with lupus and pemphigus. Promising clinical results in over 200 patients receiving active and convenient sc dosing positions this program for advancement into controlled trials, alone and in combination with other agents. The indications would be patients with hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases. The Company’s unique sc formulation has been patented.

Milatuzumab
Milatuzumab is a humanized anti-CD74 antibody targeting CD74 present on antigen-presenting cells, including B cells and dendritic cells. The Company is studying milatuzumab (sc formulation) in patients with lupus, under a U.S. Department of Defense grant. Previously, milatuzumab was studied as a monotherapy and in combination with veltuzumab, in patients with relapsed, refractory NHL, as well as a monotherapy in patients with advanced and refractory multiple myeloma; it showed activity in both disease settings. In a Phase 1b open-label study, patients with lupus received a dose per week for four weeks of milatuzumab, and were then assessed for disease activity using BILAG and SELENA-SLEDAI scoring systems. Results presented at EULAR in 2016 included all 10 patients enrolled showed a decrease in disease activity in at least one body system. Suppression of disease activity extended for 24 weeks in most patients. Injection reactions were mild-moderate. This has now moved into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, expansion phase, to confirm the activity of sc milatuzumab in this population, and continues to be supported by the U.S. Department of Defense.

IMMU-114
This 2nd generation anti-HLA-DR humanized antibody is an IgG4 immunoglobulin, administered by sc injection, and designed to reduce toxicities (severe infusion reactions) seen with prior IgG1 antibodies administered intravenously. Initial clinical studies in NHL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are continuing, with activity reported after patients had failed therapy with rituximab. Treatment cycles are now given repeatedly in a dose-determining clinical trial.

PRECLINICAL PROGRAMS:
IMMU-132 Preclinical Development (PARP Inhibitors/Chemotherapy Combinations)
Based on a preclinical study, the encouraging efficacy observed with IMMU-132 in animal models were presented, demonstrating the potential for improved therapeutic results when combined with agents that inhibit DNA repair pathways, both in mutated and wild-type BRCA1/2. Results from this preclinical study were published online in Clinical Cancer Research, a major peer-reviewed journal in cancer research and one of the official publications of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper). Company scientists are also studying why cancer cells that express Trop-2 respond differentially to IMMU-132, in an effort to enhance the therapeutic effects clinically. Results suggest that different degrees of tumor resistance may be overcome, which could have a major impact on future clinical results.

IMMU-140 Preclinical Development
IMMU-140 is an ADC comprising SN-38 conjugated to IMMU-114 (anti-HLA-DR humanized antibody). It has been shown that the ADC possesses both the functional activities of the unconjugated antibody, IMMU-114, and the toxic effects of selective delivery of SN-38 to tumors, thus having a dual function. At the recent 2016 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper), the Company’s scientists showed that this dual activity resulted in more potent antitumor effects compared to IMMU-114, and that IMMU-140 had potent activity against five hematological neoplasms grown in cell culture and in suitable mice: NHL, CLL, ALL, multiple myeloma, and acute myeloid leukemia. IMMU-140 also targets some solid cancers not under investigation by the Company’s other two ADCs; namely, malignant melanoma and glioblastoma multiforme. This ADC is completing studies necessary to transfer it to clinical trials.

Bispecific Antibody Technology
The Company reported on the Dock-N-Lock (DNL) technology for making multi-valent antibody constructs, including CD22-CD20 bispecific antibodies, and the potential therapeutic indications in NHL, CLL, ALL, and multiple autoimmune diseases. By targeting two different receptors on circulating malignant B cells or B cells implicated in autoimmunity, the Company has shown enhanced potency compared to the parental antibodies targeting either CD22 or CD20. Moreover, these new constructs appear to have less destruction of normal B cells needed for immunity than the parental anti-CD20 antibody or other anti-CD20 antibodies currently available.

T-cell Retargeting
The Company presented preclinical data on a DNL-derived bispecific antibody for T-cell redirected killing of various hematological and solid tumors. This construct comprises the bivalent binding of CD19 or Trop-2 and monovalent CD3 recruitment of T cells on many different types of hematological and epithelial cancers, respectively.

MRC Technology, Cancer Research UK and Cancer Research Technology collaborate to focus on cancer immunotherapies

On January 18, 2017 Cancer Research UK, Cancer Research Technology and MRC Technology reported that they are joining forces to identify and validate novel drug discovery targets that could lead to new immunotherapy treatments (Press release, Cancer Research Technology, 18 18, 2017, View Source [SID1234523172]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The partnership brings together Cancer Research UK’s network of leading scientists with CRT’s cancer-focused target selection and validation expertise, and MRCT’s antibody screening and development capability. The collaboration will identify possible targets for the development of both antibody and small molecule therapeutics. The next stage of the collaboration will be to seek a clinical partner to accelerate the progress of promising compounds into the clinic.

New targets that increase cancer’s susceptibility to the immune system will be identified from Cancer Research UK’s funded research. MRC Technology will develop antibodies for suitable targets via its antibody screening platform, while CRT will focus on small molecule approaches.

Dr Hamish Ryder, director of discovery, Cancer Research Technology, said: "Immunotherapy is a hugely promising approach to cancer treatment and we’re delighted to extend our research in this area by partnering with MRC Technology.

"The aim of this alliance is to work together to identify highly novel immunotherapy targets and develop treatments that will complement the checkpoint inhibitors that are already having such an impact on patients.

"We want to move quickly to bring promising new drugs forward to treat cancer patients as soon as possible."

Dr Justin Bryans, director, drug discovery at MRC Technology said: "Bringing together MRC Technology’s antibody drug discovery and CRT’s cancer biology expertise and applying them to cutting-edge discoveries from the Cancer Research UK network represents a very exciting prospect and will help us identify and develop new immune-oncology therapies, which already have a significant impact on cancer patients’ lives."

CRT and MRC Technology will be joint commercialisation partners for the collaboration and any resulting immunotherapy treatments.

2017 Investor R&D Day

On January 18, 2017 Immunomedics reported new data for sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) during the Company’s Investor R&D Day (Filing, 8-K, Immunomedics, JAN 18, 2017, View Source [SID1234517458]). The entire presentation is available on the Company’s website, www.immunomedics.com.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

IMMU-132 is Immunomedics’ proprietary solid tumor therapy candidate that is advancing through development in four indications: metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the lead indication and for which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has awarded Breakthrough Therapy Designation; urothelial cancer (UC); small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunomedics expects to submit a Biological License Application (BLA) to the FDA for accelerated approval of IMMU-132 in TNBC patients in mid-2017.

Cynthia L. Sullivan, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, "The data to support our BLA filing for accelerated approval for IMMU-132 in TNBC continues to improve as more confirmed results become available for the patients enrolled into our TNBC clinical trial. Additionally, with the assistance of our outside financial and strategic advisor, Greenhill & Co., LLC, we are making significant progress with multiple partnership and strategic opportunities for IMMU-132, and we are very encouraged with the interest thus far. We believe there is a limited and diminishing number of compelling oncology assets available, and we are focused on bringing IMMU-132 to late-stage cancer patients as expeditiously as possible. Furthermore, now is the right time to deliver on the potential value of IMMU-132 on behalf of our stockholders."

New IMMU-132 Results Highlight Progress Toward Potential Accelerated Approval
Ms. Sullivan reported that IMMU-132 has been studied in over 410 diverse cancer patients, with the dose of 10 mg/kg given on days 1 and 8 of repeated 21-day cycles being the established dose regimen. According to Ms. Sullivan, some patients have been treated for more than a year.

The Company has engaged an independent third-party to review pertinent radiological scan results from the TNBC and its NSCLC indications, in a blinded fashion, as per FDA requirements.

Immunomedics disclosed results in 85 assessable TNBC patients. These results will be part of the BLA submission for the accelerated approval of IMMU-132. The Company announced last month that it had achieved the goal of enrolling 100 TNBC patients, as requested by FDA for this BLA filing. The Company reported that the objective response rate and median progression-free survival (PFS, intention-to-treat, or ITT, basis) have been maintained with these additional patient results, while the median overall survival (OS also on ITT basis) has been extended to almost 19 months. These patients experienced two complete and 23 partial responses, while an additional three patients with initial partial responses are awaiting confirmation. Overall, 81% of patients treated with IMMU-132 showed tumor shrinkage from baseline measurements. The clinical benefit rate (complete and partial remissions, and patients with stable disease) at six months or later computed to 44%. The median duration of response for those with objective responses was almost 11 months. It was emphasized that these are interim results, since 20 patients are continuing treatment; a final outcome must await analysis of all patients enrolled.

The major toxicity (grade >3) has been neutropenia (39%) in this and most cancer patient cohorts, which has been manageable by dose reduction, dose delays, or giving a hematopoietic cytokine. Diarrhea, which is the major side effect with irinotecan, the parent drug from which SN-38 is derived, has been much less, such as a grade >3 of 13%.

Dr. Linda T. Vahdat, Professor of Medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College, and Co-Leader of the Breast Cancer Program at Meyer Cancer Center, New York, who is one of the senior investigators in the IMMU-132 trial and presenter of these results, said: "These are excellent results in this very advanced and heavily-pretreated group of patients who have exhausted virtually all therapeutic options, and come with a relatively good safety profile. As the first investigator to recognize the potential role of IMMU-132 in TNBC, I am delighted with this outcome and look forward to its future use in these critical patients."

"Further, with encouraging preclinical results of the combination of IMMU-132 with PARP inhibitors in TNBC models, we are interested in the prospect of this combination in an earlier therapy setting for these patients," Dr. Vahdat added.

In addition to TNBC, Immunomedics is making progress with IMMU-132 across the other three advanced indications. In patients with urothelial cancer, especially metastatic urinary bladder cancer, Dr. Scott T. Tagawa, Associate Professor of Medicine and Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, and Attending Physician, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, reported on 27 assessable patients from more than 40 patients enrolled. The objective response rate was 33%, including one complete and eight partial remissions. The duration of objective response was a median of 7.5 months, with one patient with a partial response approaching 17 months. The clinical benefit rate at six months or later was 59%, but 10 patients are still under therapy. Overall, 70% of the patients showed tumor shrinkage from baseline with IMMU-132 therapy. The median PFS and OS on an ITT basis were seven and almost 16 months, respectively. The safety profile was similar to the findings in patients with TNBC.

"These patients had a median of two prior therapies and had extensive metastatic disease. While patients with metastatic urothelial cancer respond well to initial therapy with a platinum-containing regimen, few options are available after they become refractive. The recent approval of an immune checkpoint inhibitor has been an important advance, but only a fraction of patients respond. In our trial, we had two such patients who were unresponsive to this therapy but showed tumor shrinkage with IMMU-132," Dr. Tagawa said: "I am impressed with the results we have seen in this difficult-to-treat population and we continue to enroll these advanced patients in order to better position this new agent in the management of this disease, either as a second line therapy or perhaps someday in combination with chemotherapy or an immune checkpoint inhibitor."

Interim results in patients with lung cancers also were presented. Dr. Ronald J. Scheff, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, reported on over 50 patients with metastatic NSCLC being enrolled, showing about one-fifth of evaluable patients had a partial response. Overall, 64% of patients had tumor shrinkage from baseline measurements when given IMMU-132. These patients had a median of three prior therapies. Importantly, patients with either nonsquamous or squamous pathology responded, as well as patients who failed a prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The clinical benefit rate at four months or later was 43%. The median duration of response was eight months, but two patients remain under therapy and responsive for over 20 months. Median PFS and OS on an ITT basis were five and over nine months, respectively.

In patients with metastatic SCLC who had a median of two prior therapies, 16% experienced a confirmed partial response, with an additional nine patients showing tumor shrinkage >20%. Overall, 60% of patients showed tumor shrinkage from baseline. The clinical benefit rate at 4 months or later was 40%. The median duration of partial responses and stable disease was about five months (two patients extending out to 21 months), while the median PFS and OS on an ITT basis were almost four months and seven months, respectively.

"These results in advanced metastatic NSCLC and SCLC patients are very impressive. Durable responses were seen even in patients refractory to multiple prior therapeutic regimens, including immune checkpoint inhibitors," Dr. Scheff said. "NSCLC is the most common cause of cancer death in the Western World, with very poor 5-year survival statistics. The demonstration of a median survival of over 9 months after patients had already progressed after a range of one to seven prior therapies represents a significant advance."

Dr. Scheff added, "Although advanced metastatic SCLC commonly responds favorably to first-line chemotherapy, the disease typically subsequently recurs and is associated with a poor prognosis. An agent such as IMMU-132 that can control disease in some patients for up to almost two years is most encouraging."

Ms. Sullivan concluded, "These updated data on our lead indications continue to be impressive, particularly because the results from the additional patients enrolled in these trials did not adversely affect the efficacy and safety outcomes. As a monotherapy in late-stage patients with these solid tumor types, it is very rewarding to have developed a product candidate that could make a positive impact and fill the high unmet medical need of such patients. Our trials continue to evaluate IMMU-132 in other cancer types, such as other metastatic breast cancers, as well as metastatic endometrial and prostate cancers. The positive results we have achieved thus far are a testament to the strength of our clinical investigators and our talented team, and we remain confident in the near-and long-term potential of IMMU-132, which could drive significant value for our stockholders."

In his concluding remarks, Dr. Goldenberg said that the Company’s scientists are conducting studies to enhance the good clinical results with IMMU-132 even further, such as overcoming drug resistance and devising more effective drug combinations. In addition, he emphasized that clinical trials are now expanding in patients with other forms of metastatic breast cancer, as well as metastatic endometrial and prostate cancers, since they have high expression of Trop-2.

Value Realization Process for IMMU-132
In addition to the new clinical data, Immunomedics announced a series of updates related to other aspects of the IMMU-132 program.

Commercial
Immunomedics unveiled a summary of the commercial assessment conducted by Health Advances LLC, an independent third-party consulting firm focused exclusively on the healthcare industry, retained to conduct a full commercial assessment of the U.S. and European market opportunities for IMMU-132. The Health Advances study determined that if the current IMMU-132 clinical data are supported by confirmatory/pivotal studies, the U.S. and European market opportunity for IMMU-132 as a third-line monotherapy in TNBC, UC, NSCLC, and SCLC could exceed $3 billion by 2025. Combination and early-line approaches may increase the opportunity to over $7 billion. "IMMU-132’s initial clinical data are very exciting to top oncology key opinion leaders, who see it as a compelling agent with significant potential to address major unmet needs," said Andrew Funderburk, Partner, Health Advances.

Regulatory
Regulatory developments for the IMMU-132 program in TNBC also were presented. The development timeline includes commencement of the Phase 3 confirmatory trial having a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) in with FDA, in the next few months. Immunomedics plans to file the results with the 100-patient study required by FDA in the accelerated approval application in mid-2017.

Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC)
The Company has added significant value to the IMMU-132 program in preparation of the BLA filing for accelerated approval in TNBC, including the scaled-up manufacturing of the ADC for Phase 3/commercial launch materials, extensive comparability testing of Phase 2 vs. Phase 3/commercial product, stability assessments of Phase 3/commercial lots, and full characterization and other analyses required in the CMC portion of the BLA. Additionally, an independent audit of commercial manufacturing facilities, processes, and other relevant CMC matters is underway, all in preparation for the timely BLA filing.

Intellectual Property
IMMU-132 has an exceptionally strong patent portfolio. Including the proprietary linker and the use of this ADC in patient therapy, IMMU-132 has been patented in the United States and abroad. IMMU-132, as a biotechnology product, could gain regulatory exclusivity in the United States for 12 years and for 10 years in Europe. Currently, 32 patents on IMMU-132 have been issued in the United States alone, with a patent life extending to 2033; 16 foreign patents also exist.

Celsion Corporation Announces Issuance of Two New Patents for ThermoDox®

On January 18, 2017 Celsion Corporation (NASDAQ:CLSN), a clinical stage oncology drug development company, reported that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has granted U.S Utility Patent No. 9,492,385 B2 – Temperature-Sensitive Liposomal Formulation, which is directly applicable to the method of treating cancer using the Company’s current ThermoDox formulation (Press release, Celsion, JAN 18, 2017, View Source [SID1234517437]). The claims cover intravenous or direct (to the tumor) administration of the formulation followed by heating and extends coverage time over ThermoDox’s current parent patents. The Company also announced the issuance of Korean Patent No. 1652126 – Novel Thermosensitive Liposomes Containing Therapeutic Agents, which relates to composition claims directed to a thermally sensitive liposome that contains all of the components in the Company’s ThermoDox liposome as well as one additional lipid (DSPG).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These two new patents strengthen the global coverage of ThermoDox, Celsion’s proprietary dose form of doxorubicin based on a heat-activated liposomal platform technology, currently in Phase III development for the treatment of primary liver cancer, also known as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The Company’s Phase III OPTIMA Study is expected to enroll up to 550 patients at up to 75 clinical sites in the North America, Europe, China, S. Korea, Taiwan, and Southeast Asia, and will evaluate ThermoDox in combination with optimized RFA, which will be standardized to a minimum of 45 minutes across all investigators and clinical sites for treating HCC lesions three to seven centimeters, versus standardized RFA alone.

"The issuance of these patents further strengthens Celsion’s growing position as a leader in the development of directed chemotherapeutics designed to address some of the most difficult-to-treat cancers. In conjunction with its composition of matter patents, these new issuances broaden our intellectual property portfolio and provides for life cycle management of ThermoDox well into the next decade. Additionally by covering the use of ThermoDox, Celsion reinforces its exclusivity in many of the major markets around the world where HCC approaches epidemic proportions," said Michael H. Tardugno, chairman, president and CEO. "HCC has the fastest rate of growth of all cancers with annual incidence of over 800,000 new cases and is projected to be the most prevalent form of cancer by 2020."

ThermoDox is currently in late stage clinical trials in primary liver cancer and recurrent chest wall breast cancer. It is positioned for use with multiple heating technologies, and has the potential for applications in the treatment of other forms of cancer including metastatic liver and non-muscle invading bladder cancers.

About ThermoDox
Celsion’s most advanced program is a heat-mediated drug delivery technology that employs a novel heat-sensitive liposome engineered to address a range of difficult-to-treat cancers. The first application of this platform is ThermoDox, a lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD), whose novel mechanism of action delivers high concentrations of doxorubicin to a region targeted with the application of localized heat at 40°C, just above body temperature. ThermoDox has the potential to address a broad range of cancers.

Celsion’s LTLD technology leverages two mechanisms of tumor biology to deliver higher concentrations of drug directly to the tumor site. In the first mechanism, rapidly growing tumors have leaky vasculature, which is permeable to liposomes and enables their accumulation within tumors. Leaky vasculature influences a number of factors within the tumor, including the access of therapeutic agents to tumor cells. Administered intravenously, ThermoDox is engineered with a half-life to allow significant accumulation of liposomes at the tumor site as these liposomes recirculate in the blood stream. In the second mechanism, when an external heating device heats tumor tissue to a temperature of 40°C or greater, the heat-sensitive liposome rapidly changes structure and the liposomal membrane selectively dissolves, creating openings that can release a chemotherapeutic agent directly into the tumor and into the surrounding vasculature. Drug concentration increases as a function of the accumulation of liposomes at the tumor site, but only where the heat is present. This method damages only the tumor and the area related to tumor invasion, supporting more precise drug targeting.