Xspray Pharma får sina första produktpatent i Japan

Xspray Pharma har fått godkännande för två sökta patent i Japan (Press release, Xspray, OCT 4, 2017, View Source [SID1234523283]). Patenten gäller dels komposition, dels metod, avseende produktkandidaten HyNap-Dasa. Det är Xsprays första godkännande på en av de tre strategiska huvudmarknaderna USA, Europa och Japan. Bolaget har pågående ansökningsärenden för motsvarande patent för samtliga tre produktkandidater i USA, Europa och Japan.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Att vi nu får patent beviljade bekräftar att de finns en unik och skyddsvärd innovationshöjd i vår teknologi och i våra produktkandidater," säger Per Andersson, vd för Xspray Pharma.

Xspray Pharma har erhållit godkännande ("patent allowance") för två sökta patent i Japan avseende produktkandidaten HyNap-Dasa som är tänkt för behandling av vissa cancerformer. Det är de två första patenten som beviljas för bolagets produktkandidater på en viktig och kommersiellt intressant marknad. Beskedet kommer i enlighet med bolagets plan att söka patent för komposition och metod för samtliga tre produktkandidater under utveckling på de tre viktigaste marknaderna, USA, Europa och Japan.

"Vi satsar primärt på att lansera våra produktkandidater på den amerikanska marknaden, men vi vill samtidigt bygga upp en kommersiell beredskap för att dra nytta av möjligheter som kan öppna sig på andra viktiga marknader, främst Japan och Europa. Där fyller vår patentstrategi en viktig funktion," kommenterar Xsprays vd Per Andersson.

Xspray Pharmas aktier introducerades den 26 september på Nasdaq First North, efter en lyckosamt genomförd nyemission som tillförde bolaget 132 miljoner kronor före emissionskostnader. Planen är nu att använda kapitalet för att utveckla tre produktkandidater och blivande cancerläkemedel baserade på bolagets egenutvecklade teknologi, samt att introducera de första produkterna på den amerikanska marknaden under perioden 2020-2023.

Lilly Receives U.S. FDA Approval of Verzenio™ (abemaciclib)

On October 4, 2017 Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Verzenio (abemaciclib) in combination with fulvestrant for the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy, and as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (Press release, Eli Lilly, OCT 4, 2017, View Source [SID1234520794]). It is the first and only CDK4 & 6 inhibitor FDA approved in combination with fulvestrant and as monotherapy.[1] The approval of Verzenio was received on September 28, 2017.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Verzenio is a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 & 6 inhibitor that will be available as 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg tablets. The recommended dose of Verzenio, in combination with fulvestrant, is 150 mg orally twice daily. As a monotherapy, the recommended dose of Verzenio is 200 mg orally twice daily. Both doses are recommended to be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.1

"In recent years, CDK4 & 6 inhibitors have evolved treatment expectations for those with metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, there is still a need for new agents to treat estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer, like Verzenio," said George W. Sledge Jr., M.D., professor of medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and MONARCH 2 principal investigator. "Today’s approval represents an important development for our patients, who are dealing with the uncertainty of breast cancer progression."

The approval of Verzenio is based on the efficacy and safety demonstrated in the pivotal MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 1 clinical trials. MONARCH 2 was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating Verzenio in combination with fulvestrant that enrolled 669 patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who progressed on endocrine therapy. MONARCH 1 was a Phase 2 single-arm trial evaluating Verzenio monotherapy that enrolled 132 patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who had prior endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Verzenio was given a Priority Review as part of the FDA’s Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions.

In MONARCH 2, Verzenio plus fulvestrant demonstrated a greater than 16-month median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who progressed on endocrine therapy (16.4 months vs 9.3 months with placebo plus fulvestrant, HR: 0.553; 95% CI: 0.449-0.681, P <.0001). In patients with measurable disease who received Verzenio plus fulvestrant (n=318), an objective response rate (ORR; defined as complete response plus partial response [CR + PR]; PR defined as ≥30% reduction in target lesions)[2] of 48.1 percent (n=153) was achieved, with 44.7 percent (n=142) of patients having achieved a PR and 3.5 percent (n=11) having achieved a CR (95% CI: 42.6-53.6).[3] In MONARCH 1, Verzenio achieved an investigator-assessed ORR of 19.7 percent (n=26), of which all responses were partial (95% CI: 13.3-27.5) and demonstrated an 8.6-month median duration of response (DoR) (95% CI: 5.8-10.2), per investigator assessment. Assessments by independent review yielded comparable results for ORR and DoR for MONARCH 1.[4]

The labeling for Verzenio contains warnings and precautions for diarrhea, neutropenia, hepatotoxicity, venous thromboembolism, and embryofetal toxicity. Instruct patients at the first sign of loose stools to initiate antidiarrheal therapy, increase oral fluids, and notify their healthcare provider. Perform complete blood count and liver function tests prior to the start of Verzenio treatment, every two weeks for the first two months, monthly for the next two months, and as clinically indicated. Based on results, Verzenio may require dose modification. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and treat as medically appropriate. Advise patients of potential risk to a fetus and to use effective contraception. See full Prescribing Information for further management instructions.

"The FDA approval of Verzenio illustrates Lilly Oncology’s dedication to discovering, developing and delivering innovative, foundational medicines that offer a meaningful difference to patients," said Levi Garraway, M.D., Ph.D., senior vice president, global development and medical affairs, Lilly Oncology. "Our goal at Lilly is to arm physicians with the clinical evidence and therapeutic options necessary to care for patients throughout the breast cancer care continuum. With the approval of Verzenio, we are proud to partner with oncologists to ensure that women living with advanced breast cancer have new treatment options."

"The approval of Verzenio marks an exciting day for the metastatic breast cancer community," said Marc Hurlbert, Ph.D., chairman, Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance. "For women living with advanced disease, every new treatment approved offers the hope of possibility – that their oncologists have more options that may help slow the spread of this deadly cancer."

Verzenio will be available in the U.S. by mid-October 2017. Lilly will work with insurers, health systems and providers to ensure patients are able to access this treatment. Patients, physicians, pharmacists or other healthcare professionals with questions about Verzenio should contact The Lilly Answers Center at 1-800-LillyRx (1-800-545-5979) or visit www.lilly.com.

About MONARCH 2

MONARCH 2 was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled 669 patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who progressed on endocrine therapy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to Verzenio plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. Verzenio was dosed on a continuous dosing schedule until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. Key secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, and DoR. Patients enrolled in the study had experienced disease progression on or within 12 months of receiving endocrine treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting or while receiving first-line endocrine therapy for metastatic disease. Patients could not have received chemotherapy or more than one line of endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer.3

Verzenio plus fulvestrant demonstrated a greater than 16-month median PFS in patients who progressed on endocrine therapy (16.4 months vs 9.3 months with placebo plus fulvestrant, HR: 0.553; 95% CI: 0.449-0.681, P<.0001). The percentage of PFS events at the time of analysis was 49.8 percent (n=222) and 70.4 percent (n=157) in the Verzenio plus fulvestrant and placebo plus fulvestrant arms, respectively. In patients with measurable disease who received Verzenio plus fulvestrant (n=318), 48.1 percent achieved an objective response (95% CI: 42.6-53.6). Among patients with measurable disease who received placebo plus fulvestrant (n=164), 21.3 percent achieved an objective response (95% CI: 15.1-27.6).1DoR was not yet reached at the time of analysis with Verzenio plus fulvestrant (95% CI: 18.1-NR) and was 25.6 months with placebo plus fulvestrant (95% CI: 11.9-25.6). 3

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥20%) observed in MONARCH 2 for Verzenio plus fulvestrant vs placebo plus fulvestrant were diarrhea (86% vs 25%), neutropenia (46% vs 4%), fatigue (46% vs 32%), nausea (45% vs 23%), infections (43% vs 25%), abdominal pain (35% vs 16%), anemia (29% vs 4%), leukopenia (28% vs 2%), decreased appetite (27% vs 12%), vomiting (26% vs 10%), and headache (20% vs 15%).

About MONARCH 1

MONARCH 1, a Phase 2, single-arm trial, enrolled 132 patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who were given Verzenio (200 mg) dosed orally twice daily. Patients enrolled in the study had measurable disease, progressed during or after prior endocrine therapy, and received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. The primary endpoint was ORR and the secondary endpoint was DoR. Verzenio demonstrated single-agent efficacy in this heavily pretreated patient population. In the study, per investigator assessment, Verzenio achieved an ORR of 19.7 percent (95% CI: 13.3-27.5). Verzenio demonstrated an 8.6-month median DoR (95% CI: 5.8-10.2). Assessments by independent review yielded comparable rates and estimates.4

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥20%) observed in MONARCH 1 with Verzenio were diarrhea (90%), fatigue (65%), nausea (64%), decreased appetite (45%), abdominal pain (39%), neutropenia (37%), vomiting (35%), infections (31%), anemia (25%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and headache (20%). Please see Important Safety Information at the end of this press release and full Prescribing Information for additional information.

About Advanced Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide with nearly 1.7 million new cases diagnosed in 2012.[5] An estimated 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in the U.S. in women in 2017.[6] Advanced breast cancer includes metastatic breast cancer, cancer that has spread from the breast tissue to other parts of the body, and locally or regionally advanced breast cancer, meaning the cancer has grown outside the organ where it started but has not yet spread to other parts of the body.[7] Of all early stage breast cancer cases diagnosed in the U.S., approximately 30 percent will become metastatic and an estimated six to 10 percent of all new breast cancer cases are initially diagnosed as being metastatic.[8] Survival is lower among women with a more advanced stage at diagnosis: 5-year relative survival is 99 percent for localized disease, 85 percent for regional disease, and 26 percent for metastatic disease. Other factors, such as tumor size, also impact 5-year survival estimates.[9]

About VerzenioTM (abemaciclib)

Verzenio (abemaciclib) is an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, which are activated by binding to D-cyclins. In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines, cyclin D1 and CDK4 & 6 promote phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), cell cycle progression, and cell proliferation.

Verzenio disrupts the cell cycle. Preclinically, Verzenio dosed daily without interruption as a single agent or in combination with antiestrogens resulted in reduction of tumor size. In vitro, continuous exposure to Verzenio inhibited Rb phosphorylation and blocked progression from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle, resulting in senescence and apoptosis (cell death). Inhibiting CDK4 & 6 in healthy cells can result in side effects, some of which may be serious. Clinical evidence also suggests that Verzenio crosses the blood-brain barrier.1

INDICATION

Verzenio is indicated:

· in combination with fulvestrant for women with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy

· as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Diarrhea occurred in 86% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and 90% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 13% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and in 20% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. Episodes of diarrhea have been associated with dehydration and infection.

In MONARCH 2, diarrhea incidence was greatest during the first month of Verzenio dosing. The median time to onset of the first diarrhea event was 6 days, and the median duration of diarrhea for Grades 2 and 3 were 9 days and 6 days, respectively. Twenty-two percent of patients with diarrhea required a dose omission and 22% required a dose reduction. In the MONARCH 1 study, the time to onset and resolution for diarrhea were similar to those in MONARCH 2.

Instruct patients that at the first sign of loose stools, they should start antidiarrheal therapy such as loperamide, increase oral fluids, and notify their healthcare provider for further instructions and appropriate follow-up. For Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, or diarrhea that requires hospitalization, discontinue Verzenio until toxicity resolves to ≤Grade 1, and then resume Verzenio at the next lower dose.

Neutropenia occurred in 46% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and 37% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. A Grade ≥3 decrease in neutrophil count (based on laboratory findings) occurred in 32% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and in 27% of patients receiving Verzenio in MONARCH 1. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 1, the median time to first episode of Grade >3 neutropenia was 29 days, and the median duration of Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 15 days.

Monitor complete blood counts prior to the start of Verzenio therapy, every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, monthly for the next 2 months, and as clinically indicated. Dose interruption, dose reduction, or delay in starting treatment cycles is recommended for patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Febrile neutropenia has been reported in 1% of patients exposed to Verzenio in MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 1. Two deaths due to neutropenic sepsis were observed in MONARCH 2. Inform patients to promptly report any episodes of fever to their healthcare provider.

Grade ≥3 increases in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (4% versus 2%) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (2% versus 3%) were reported in the Verzenio and placebo arms respectively, in MONARCH 2.

In MONARCH 2, for patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant with Grade ≥3 ALT increased, median time to onset was 57 days, and median time to resolution to Grade <3 was 14 days. For patients with Grade ≥3 AST increased, median time to onset was 185 days, and median time to resolution was 13 days.

For assessment of potential hepatotoxicity, monitor liver function tests (LFTs) prior to the start of Verzenio therapy, every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, monthly for the next 2 months, and as clinically indicated. Dose interruption, dose reduction, dose discontinuation, or delay in starting treatment cycles is recommended for patients who develop persistent or recurrent Grade 2, or Grade 3 or 4, hepatic transaminase elevation.

Venous thromboembolic events were reported in 5% of patients treated with Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 as compared to 0.9% of patients treated with fulvestrant plus placebo. Venous thromboembolic events included deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, subclavian and axillary vein thrombosis, and inferior vena cava thrombosis. Across the clinical development program, deaths due to venous thromboembolism have been reported. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and treat as medically appropriate.

Verzenio can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman based on findings from animal studies and the mechanism of action. In animal reproduction studies, administration of abemaciclib to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis caused teratogenicity and decreased fetal weight at maternal exposures that were similar to the human clinical exposure based on area under the curve (AUC) at the maximum recommended human dose. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Verzenio and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose. There are no data on the presence of Verzenio in human milk or its effects on the breastfed child or on milk production. Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during Verzenio treatment and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants. Based on findings in animals, Verzenio may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential.

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥10%) observed in MONARCH 2 for Verzenio plus fulvestrant and ≥2% higher than placebo plus fulvestrant were diarrhea (86% vs 25%), neutropenia (46% vs 4%), fatigue (46% vs 32%), nausea (45% vs 23%), infections (43% vs 25%), abdominal pain (35% vs 16%), anemia (29% vs 4%), leukopenia (28% vs 2%), decreased appetite (27% vs 12%), vomiting (26% vs 10%), headache (20% vs 15%), dysgeusia (18% vs 3%), thrombocytopenia (16% vs 3%), alopecia (16% vs 2%), stomatitis (15% vs 10%), ALT increased (13% vs 5%), pruritus (13% vs 6%), cough (13% vs 11%), dizziness (12% vs 6%), AST increased (12% vs 7%), peripheral edema (12% vs 7%), creatinine increased (12% vs <1%), rash (11% vs 4%), pyrexia (11% vs 6%), and weight decreased (10% vs 2%).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥10%) observed in MONARCH 1 with Verzenio were diarrhea (90%), fatigue (65%), nausea (64%), decreased appetite (45%), abdominal pain (39%), neutropenia (37%), vomiting (35%), infections (31%), anemia (25%), thrombocytopenia (20%), headache (20%), cough (19%), leukopenia (17%), constipation (17%), arthralgia (15%), dry mouth (14%), weight decreased (14%), stomatitis (14%), creatinine increased (13%), alopecia (12%), dysgeusia (12%), pyrexia (11%), dizziness (11%), and dehydration (10%).

The most frequently reported ≥5% Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions that occurred in the Verzenio arm of MONARCH 2 were neutropenia (27% vs 2%), diarrhea (13% vs <1%), leukopenia (9% vs 0%), anemia (7% vs 1%), and infections (6% vs 3%).

The most frequently reported ≥5% Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions from MONARCH 1 with Verzenio were neutropenia (24%), diarrhea (20%), fatigue (13%), infections (7%), leukopenia (6%), anemia (5%), and nausea (5%).

Lab abnormalities (all grades; Grade 3 or 4) for MONARCH 2 in ≥10% for Verzenio plus fulvestrant and ≥2% higher than placebo plus fulvestrant were increased serum creatinine (98% vs 74%; 1% vs 0%), decreased white blood cells (90% vs 33%; 23% vs 1%), decreased neutrophil count (87% vs 30%; 33% vs 4%), anemia (84% vs 33%; 3% vs <1%), decreased lymphocyte count (63% vs 32%; 12% vs 2%), decreased platelet count (53% vs 15%; 2% vs 0%), increased ALT (41% vs 32%; 5% vs 1%), and increased AST (37% vs 25%; 4% vs 4%).

Lab abnormalities (all grades; Grade 3 or 4) for MONARCH 1 with Verzenio were increased serum creatinine (98%; <1%), decreased white blood cells (91%; 28%), decreased neutrophil count (88%; 27%), anemia (68%; 0%), decreased lymphocyte count (42%; 14%), decreased platelet count (41%; 2%), increased ALT (31%; 3%), and increased AST (30%; 4%).

Strong CYP3A inhibitors increased the exposure of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites to a clinically meaningful extent and may lead to increased toxicity. Avoid concomitant use of ketoconazole. Ketoconazole is predicted to increase the AUC of abemaciclib by up to 16-fold. In patients with recommended starting doses of 200 mg twice daily or 150 mg twice daily, reduce the Verzenio dose to 100 mg twice daily with concomitant use of other strong CYP3A inhibitors. In patients who have had a dose reduction to 100 mg twice daily due to adverse reactions, further reduce the Verzenio dose to 50 mg twice daily with concomitant use of other strong CYP3A inhibitors. If a patient taking Verzenio discontinues a strong CYP3A inhibitor, increase the Verzenio dose (after 3 to 5 half-lives of the inhibitor) to the dose that was used before starting the strong inhibitor. Patients should avoid grapefruit products.

Avoid concomitant use of strong CYP3A inducers and consider alternative agents. Coadministration of Verzenio with rifampin, a strong CYP3A inducer, decreased the plasma concentrations of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites and may lead to reduced activity.

With severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C), reduce the Verzenio dosing frequency to once daily. The pharmacokinetics of Verzenio in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min), end stage renal disease, or in patients on dialysis is unknown. No dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with mild or moderate hepatic (Child-Pugh A or B) and/or renal impairment (CLcr ≥30-89 mL/min).

Please see full Prescribing Information for Verzenio.

11 of this Year’s Fierce 15 Awards Go to Oncology Companies

The prestigious Fierce 15 biotech award has come to symbolize novelty and being at the forefront of biotechnology development amongst privately held businesses. The winners of this award are aiming at breakthroughs and big things, not at being ‘me-too’.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


For years, 1stOncology has taken special interest in those awardees with positions in oncology or whose technologies we deem beneficial in the oncology area. With oncology being one of the fastest growing therapeutic fields, it comes as no surprise that eleven out of the fifteen 2017 Fierce 15 Biotech Award winners are oncology companies. The majority are U.S. based (8), originating from Massachusetts (4), California (2), New Jersey (1) and Texas (1). Two companies are based in Canada and one in the United Kingdom.

Awardee Founded Country
PsiOxus Therapeutics 2006 United Kingdom
PMV Pharma 2013 USA
Rubius Therapeutics 2014 USA
Vividion Therapeutics 2014 USA
Gritstone Oncology 2015 USA
Turnstone Biologics 2015 Canada
Aravive Biologics 2016 USA
Magenta Therapeutics 2016 USA
Relay Therapeutics 2016 USA
Repare Therapeutics 2016 Canada
Tango Therapeutics 2017 USA

These companies were all founded between 2006 and as recent as this year. PsiOxus Therapeutics is the oldest company with Tango Therapeutics being the new kid on the block. Most of the companies were founded in 2016.

Many of them have recently secured financing, like Magenta Therapeutics ($50 million (2017)), PMV Pharma ($74 million (2017)), Rubius Therapeutics ($120 million (2017)), Tango Therapeutics ($55 million (2017)) and Relay Therapeutics ($57 million (2016)).

Among the technologies and discovery engines of the above companies we find gene editing, oncolytic viruses, synthetic lethality and neoantigen-based immunotherapies etc. Target interest falls on traditional hot areas such as tumor adoptive responses, oncogenic drivers, tumor suppressor gene loss and immune evasion, but also new avenues are being explored like the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) pathway etc.

Morover, Rubius Therapeutics is developing Red-Cell Therapeutics (RCTs) as a new class of medicines for the treatment of cancer and albeit not specifically talking about oncology, Vividion Therapeutics is developing drugs based on technology that radically expands  the druggability of the human proteome.

Interested in understanding and surveying the pipelines and progress of these best and brightest award winners, not only from this year, but back to 2010? We would like to welcome you to join us for a free 30 minute 1stOncology demo to show you the difference 1stOncology can make in your day to day work.

Nimbus Therapeutics and Celgene Enter Long-Term Strategic Immunology Alliance to Develop Programs for Patients with Autoimmune Disorders

On October 3, 2017 Nimbus Therapeutics, a biotechnology company applying deep computational expertise throughout drug discovery and development, reported the initiation of a long-term strategic alliance with Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG) in immunology (Press release, Nimbus Therapeutics, OCT 3, 2017, View Source [SID1234527305]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Under the terms of the agreement, Celgene will receive an option to acquire each program in the alliance up through a clinical inflection point. Nimbus will receive an upfront payment and potential downstream milestone payments for each program Celgene chooses to acquire. Nimbus will retain full control of research and development activities for each program prior to the program’s option point. Financial terms will remain undisclosed until Celgene acquires a program.

The Nimbus programs covered under the alliance include a preclinical effort targeting Tyk2 (tyrosine kinase 2), a signal-transduction kinase for key pro-inflammatory cytokine receptors, including IL-23, IL-12 and type-I interferons. Because of its central role in the inflammatory response, Tyk2 is a high-potential target for the treatment of autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, Crohn’s disease, psoriasis and multiple sclerosis. The alliance also covers Nimbus’ preclinical small-molecule STING (stimulator of interferon genes) antagonist program, which seeks to block the role played by STING in the activation of the innate immune system in lupus and other interferonopathies. Nimbus will continue to own and develop its small-molecule STING agonist program for immuno-oncology, which is not part of the agreement.

"Celgene is committed to the continued growth of our expanding immunology and inflammation pipeline, and believes that the Nimbus immunology programs, including their efforts on Tyk2 and STING antagonists, represent important additions as we work to create the next generation of drug candidates for patients with autoimmune disorders," said Rupert Vessey, F.R.C.P., D.Phil., Executive Vice President and President, Global Research and Early Development, of Celgene.

Robert Plenge, M.D., Ph.D., Vice President, Research and Early Development, and Head, Inflammation and Immunology Thematic Center of Excellence, of Celgene, added, "We are excited about the potential of the Nimbus immunology targets, which are based on compelling human genetic data. Moreover, Nimbus’ robust in silico-based approach is very promising."

"We are thrilled to partner with Celgene and its world-renowned inflammation and immunology team to fuel the rapid advancement of these important potential therapeutic programs for patients," said Donald Nicholson, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Nimbus. "In addition, our agreement with Celgene accelerates our growth as a company back into the clinic, while also expanding the breadth of our pipeline."

KANCERA PROVIDES AN OPERATIONAL UPDATE FOR THE ROR PROJECT

On October 3, 2017 Kancera reported that the company’s ROR inhibitor KAN0441571 effectively eliminates ROR1-bearing leukemic cells in a mouse model of human chronic lymphocytic leukemia (Press release, Kancera, OCT 3, 2017, View Source;releaseID=1373958 [SID1234520782]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The study was conducted in mice into which leukemia cells from a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia were introduced. Human leukemia cells were allowed to infiltrate the lymphatic system in mice for one week, as also occurs in humans. Thereafter treatment began, consisting of two doses of KAN0441571 given every 3 days. This dose range was chosen in view of the high effect of KAN0441571 measured in laboratory studies and the long circulation time of the substance that has been measured in blood (over 10 hours).

After 13 days (and four treatment days), the number of ROR1-bearing human cancer cells in the lymphatic system (spleen sample) decreased by about 50% compared to control-treated animals. This effect is statistically significant (P < 0.0005) as is also the desired decrease in spleen weight (P < 0.0002). The results also indicate that KAN0441571 was well tolerated and gave a long-acting effect against chronic lymphocytic leukemia in this disease model that closely resembles human disease.

Kanceras KAN0441571 acts on cancer cells mainly by causing cell death by self-destruction, so called apoptosis. The research that has resulted in the production of KAN440571 is based on an assay method that identifies ROR1 inhibitory substances. Thereafter, an optimization of the cell kill effect has been carried out using leukemic cells from patients (and corresponding cells from healthy donors). This optimization process has meant that the effect of substances like KAN0441571 has been spread to several target cells in the cancer cell. Kancera has been able to verify that the total effect of KAN0441571, in addition to an inhibition of ROR1, also includes regulation of mechanisms that control cell division and inflammation signals. This pattern of effects can help Kancera identify cancers that are particularly sensitive to the substance.

About the ROR project
ROR is a family of receptors: ROR-1 and ROR-2. The ROR receptors convey signals for growth and survival. Initially, ROR was linked to fetal development, but nowadays it is known that they also contribute to the development and spread of cancer cells. Kancera and Professor Håkan Mellstedt and his colleagues at Karolinska Institutet have shown that Kancera’s ROR inhibitor is capable of killing tumor cells from tumors in the pancreas, lungs, leukemia cells and multiple myeloma cells. Researchers have also shown that ROR is active and a target in prostate, breast and ovarian cancer.

Kancera and Professor Mellstedt have shown that inhibition of ROR causes cancer cells to eliminate themselves via cellular suicide. The efficiency of eliminating cancer cells has also been optimized against cells in patient samples. Thus, the ROR inhibitors have been directed at several targets in the cancer which together add up to the desired effect. In addition to effect against ROR1, Kancera has shown that the company’s ROR inhibitor also works by controlling cell division and inflammation signals. A more effective activity against cancer cells compared to healthy cells has been ensured by continuously investigating the pattern of effects in samples from patients and healthy donors. Against this background, there is reason to believe that a ROR-targeted drug is both safer and more effective than non-selective chemotherapeutic agents that are currently used to treat cancer.