Encorafenib-based Regimens Provide Improved PFS and OS in Difficult-to-Treat BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer Compared to Historical Benchmarks

On June 4, 2016 Array BioPharma (Nasdaq: ARRY) reported updated results from a Phase 2 study of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab, with or without alpelisib, in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer (BRAFm CRC) (Press release, Array BioPharma, JUN 4, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175100 [SID:1234512988]). BRAFm CRC represents a difficult-to-treat subtype of colorectal cancer that impacts 8 to 15 percent of patients. Data from this study suggest that median overall survival (OS) for these patients may exceed one year which is more than double historical published benchmarks for this population. These data were presented at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago (Abstract No. 3544).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

With these encouraging results, Array also announced the initiation of a pivotal Phase 3 BEACON CRC (Binimetinib, Encorafenib And Cetuximab COmbiNed) to treat BRAF-mutant ColoRectal Cancer) global clinical trial, assessing the efficacy of binimetinib, encorafenib and cetuximab in comparison to cetuximab and irinotecan-based therapy.

"The BRAF mutation carries a poor prognosis for patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and is particularly unresponsive after first-line therapy," said Josep Tabernero, M.D., Ph.D., Head of the Medical Oncology Department at the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and the Director of the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology. "In the Phase 2 trial, both treatment regimens showed substantial improvement in progression-free and overall survival compared to historical published benchmarks. What’s more, median overall survival exceeded one year for these patients, again as compared to the benchmarks, which were four to six months, making a case that patients with this difficult-to-treat cancer may benefit from the combination of encorafenib-based regimens."

In the Phase 2 study, 102 patients with BRAFm CRC who had progressed after one or more prior therapies were randomized to receive the doublet regimen of encorafenib and cetuximab (ENCO 200 mg PO QD and CETUX per label; n=50) or the triplet regimen of encorafenib, cetuximab and alpelisib (ENCO, CETUX and ALP 300 mg PO QD; n=52). The Phase 2 analysis for these treatment regimens demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients:

Median OS was 12.4 and 13.1 months for the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively.
Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 and 5.4 months for the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively.
Overall response rate (ORR) was 22 percent and 27 percent for the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively.
Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurring in greater than 10 percent of patients included anemia, hyperglycemia and increased lipase.
Historical published median PFS and median OS results after first-line treatment range from 1.8 to 2.5 months and four to six months, respectively, and published overall response rates from various studies in this population range between 6 percent to 8 percent.

"There has been a long-standing need to find treatment options for patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, and we are encouraged that data from the Phase 2 study show encorafenib-based regimens may have this potential," said Victor Sandor, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, Array BioPharma. "We hope these promising findings will bring us one step closer to addressing this high unmet medical need, and we are pleased to be studying encorafenib-based regimens in our global, pivotal Phase 3 BEACON CRC trial in patients with this disease."

About BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer among men and women in the United States, with more than 134,000 new cases and nearly 50,000 deaths from the disease projected in 2016. In the United States, BRAF mutations occur in 8 to 15 percent of patients with colorectal cancer and represent a poor prognosis for these patients.

About RAF and encorafenib
RAF is a protein kinase in the MAPK signaling pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) that regulates several key cellular activities including proliferation, migration, survival and angiogenesis. Inappropriate activation of this pathway has been shown to occur in many cancers, such as melanoma, colorectal, lung and thyroid cancers. Encorafenib is a late-stage small molecule BRAF inhibitor, which targets key enzymes in this pathway. It is currently being studied in Phase 3 trials in advanced cancer patients, including the COLUMBUS trial studying encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and the recently initiated BEACON trial that will study encorafenib in combination with binimetinib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer. Array projects COLUMBUS top-line results availability during the third quarter of 2016.

– See more at: View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175100#sthash.wUh9JR8S.dpuf

Juno Therapeutics’ Defined Composition CD19 Product Candidates Demonstrate Encouraging Clinical Outcomes and Tolerability

On June 4, 2016 Juno Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: JUNO), a biopharmaceutical company focused on re-engaging the body’s immune system to revolutionize the treatment of cancer, reported that its investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell product candidates are demonstrating encouraging clinical outcomes for adults and children with B-cell malignancies (Press release, Juno, JUN 4, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175102 [SID:1234513025]). Data will be presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago, including an oral presentation today on JCAR014 (Abstract #102, Hall D1, 8:48 a.m. CT) and a poster presentation tomorrow on JCAR017 (Abstract #3048, Hall A, Board #370, 8:00 a.m. CT).
"We are encouraged by the continued efficacy and duration of response that we are seeing with our defined cell products in patients with B cell malignancies. We are moving rapidly to start potential registration trials for JCAR017 across a range of B cell malignancies, including ALL, NHL, and CLL," said Mark J. Gilbert, M.D., Juno’s Chief Medical Officer. "As our understanding of JCAR017 and JCAR014 evolves, we are increasingly able to study these defined cell product candidates in the outpatient setting, which may allow for greater access to our technologies over time."
JCAR014
Updated results from a randomized Phase I/II study examining JCAR014 in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) will be presented today by Cameron Turtle, MBBS, Ph.D., of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Key data include:
In efficacy-evaluable ALL patients (N=34), complete remission was reported in 34/34 (100%) patients and complete molecular remission as measured by flow cytometry (CmR) was achieved in 32/34 (94%) patients. Additionally, 13/20 (65%) had a complete molecular remission as measured by the highly sensitive technique of IGH deep sequencing. In the cohort that received fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) lymphodepletion, 22/22 (100%) patients achieved a complete remission, all of which were a CmR. Median disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) have not yet been reached with patients followed for up to 18 months. Severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS) was observed in 14/36 (39%) patients and Grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity was observed in 14/36 (39%) patients.
In patients with multiple NHL histologies (N=20), predominantly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who received Flu/Cy lymphodepletion followed by JCAR014 dose level 2 (2×106/kg), 16/20 (80%) had an overall response (OR), of which 10/20 (50%) experienced a complete response (CR). CRs continue in 70% of patients, ranging from 3 to 11+ months. sCRS was observed in 2/20 (10%) patients and Grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity was observed in 2/20 (10%) patients. Notably, 16/20 (80%) patients treated with Flu/Cy lymphodepletion followed by JCAR014 dose level 2 were treated in the outpatient setting, and 6/20 (30%) did not require hospitalization during the first 30 days of treatment.
A total of 13 high-risk CLL patients (complex karyotype, del17p, ibrutinib-refractory, ibrutinib-intolerant) received JCAR014 and either non-Flu/Cy (n=2) or Flu/Cy (n=11) lymphodepleting chemotherapy. In the Flu/Cy patients, OR rate was 10/11 (91%) patients, of which 5/11 (45%) patients achieved CR. CRs are ongoing in 100% of these patients with a range of 3 to 19+ months. sCRS was observed in 3/13 (23%) patients and Grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity was observed in 3/13 (23%) patients.
JCAR017
In addition to the adult JCAR014 data presented today, Rebecca Gardner, M.D., of Seattle Children’s, announced results from Seattle Children’s Phase I study of JCAR017 in pediatric and young adults with CD19+ r/r ALL (n=42) demonstrating 39/42 (93%) patients experienced a complete remission, all of which were a CmR by flow cytometry. In patients who received the Flu/Cy preconditioning regimen, 14/14 (100%) achieved a complete remission and a CmR. sCRS was observed in 10/42 (24%) patients and Grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity was observed in 10/42 (24%) patients.
About Juno’s Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and T Cell Receptor (TCR) Technologies
Juno’s CAR and TCR technologies genetically engineer T cells to recognize and kill cancer cells. Juno’s CAR T cell technology inserts a gene for a particular CAR into the T cell, enabling it to recognize cancer cells based on the expression of a specific protein located on the cell surface. Juno’s TCR technology provides the T cells with a specific T cell receptor to recognize protein fragments derived from either the surface or inside the cell. When either type of engineered T cell engages the target protein on the cancer cell, it initiates a cell-killing response against the cancer cell. JCAR014 and JCAR017 are investigational product candidates and their safety and efficacy have not been established.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


New Data Evaluating KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Demonstrate Response Rates Ranging from 48 to 71 Percent

On June 4, 2016 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, reported findings from an initial proof-of-concept study of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), the company’s anti-PD-1 therapy, combined with standard treatments, one with bevacizumab and others without, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with NSCLC; the study showed overall response rates (ORR) ranging from 48 to 71 percent, depending on the therapy used (Press release, Merck & Co, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513047]). These data, from the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-021 trial, will be presented today at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) by Dr. Shirish Gadgeel of the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (Abstract #9016) from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CDT (Location: Hall A) and in a poster discussion from 3:00 – 4:15 p.m. CDT (Location: E354b).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Combining KEYTRUDA and chemotherapy in the first-line lung cancer treatment setting is an important part of our effort to develop more treatment options for patients with non-small cell lung cancer," said Dr. Roger Dansey, senior vice president and therapeutic area head, oncology late-stage development, Merck Research Laboratories. "This study has helped us to identify chemotherapy options for combination with KEYTRUDA regardless of PD-L1 expression to take forward in phase 3 trials."

The findings presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 were based on 74 patients who were treated with KEYTRUDA and one of three different chemotherapy regimens in the phase 1b portion of the study. The data, across all three cohorts including patients with and without PD-L1 tumor expression, showed an ORR of 57 percent (n=42/74, 95% CI, 45-68), including one complete response and 41 partial responses. Median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range <1-21).

"These results are encouraging because they provide initial evidence that adding chemotherapy to KEYTRUDA may increase response rates and open new treatment paths for a broader range of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer," said Dr. Gadgeel, professor, leader of the multidisciplinary thoracic oncology team, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University in Detroit.

The highest response rates were observed in a group of 24 patients who received KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in combination with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (Cohort C), with an ORR of 71 percent (n=17/24, 95% CI, 49-87), including one complete response and 16 partial responses. In this same group, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-15.2), and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI, 13.9-NR). Median duration of follow-up was 16 months (range 4-21).

In the group that received KEYTRUDA plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (Cohort A), ORR was 52 percent (n=13/25, 95% CI, 31-72) and all responses were partial responses. Median PFS in this cohort was 10.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.0-NR). Median duration of follow-up was 13 months (range 2-21).

In the cohort that received KEYTRUDA in addition to carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (Cohort B), ORR was 48 percent (n=12/25, 95% CI, 28-69) and all responses were partial responses. Median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 4.1-NR), and median OS was not reached (95% CI, NR-NR). Median duration of follow-up was 9 months (range <1-17).

Overall Response Rates by Cohort

ORR (confirmed),
% (n) [95% CI]

Cohort A
(KEYTRUDA +
carboplatin and
paclitaxel)
N=25


Cohort B
(KEYTRUDA +
carboplatin,
paclitaxel, and
bevacizumab)
N=25

Cohort C
(KEYTRUDA +
carboplatin and
pemetrexed)
N=24


All Patients
N=74

Total Population 52% (13)
[31-72]
48% (12)
[28-69]
71% (17)
[49-87]
57% (42)
[45-68]
Complete
Response
0 0 4% (1) 1% (1)
Partial Response 52% (13) 48% (12) 67% (16) 55% (41)
Median duration
of follow-up
13 months
(range 2-21)
9 months
(range <1-17)
16 months
(range 4-21)
12 months
(range <1-21)
Responses were seen across all levels of PD-L1 expression, including in patients with PD-L1 negative tumors. PD-L1 levels assessed included high expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] of greater than or equal to 50 percent), any expression (TPS of greater than or equal to 1 percent), and negative expression (PD-L1 of less than 1 percent).

Overall Response Rates by PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score

PD-L1 TPS Status
[95% CI]
Cohort A
N=25
Cohort B
N=25
Cohort C
N=24
All Patients
N=74
TPS ≥50% 56% (5/9)
[21-86]
50% (4/8)
[16-84]
75% (6/8)
[35-97]
60% (15/25)
[39-79]
TPS ≥1% 53% (8/15)
[27-79]
50% (10/20)
[27-73]
69% (11/16)
[41-89]
57% (29/51)
[42-71]
TPS <1% 44% (4/9)
[14-79]
40% (2/5)
[5-85]
75% (6/8)
[35-97]
54% (12/22)
[32-76]
The safety profile of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in combination with chemotherapy in this study was consistent with that observed previously. One dose-limiting toxicity event occurred in Cohort C, which subsequently led to discontinuation (Grade 3 toxic epidermal necrolysis). Three patients in Cohort B discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events (Grade 3 pneumonitis, drug hypersensitivity, and autoimmune colitis). No patients in Cohort A discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 56, 71, and 67 percent of patients in Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. In Cohort B, the most common Grade 3-4 adverse events were drug hypersensitivity (8%), febrile neutropenia (8%), neutropenia (8%), white blood cell count decreased (8%), pneumonia (8%), and pulmonary embolism (8%). Immune-mediated adverse events, primarily Grades 1-2, were observed across cohorts. The most common Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse events were colitis (4% Cohort C), rash papular (4% Cohort A), pancreatitis (4% Cohort B), pneumonitis (4% Cohort B), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (4% Cohort C). There were no treatment-related deaths across cohorts; there was one death in Cohort B (Grade 5 pericardial effusion) which was not treatment-related.

Based on these findings, Merck has initiated two phase 3 trials in patients with previously untreated NSCLC. KEYNOTE-189 is evaluating the combination of KEYTRUDA plus a platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. KEYNOTE-407 will study KEYTRUDA combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel in patients with squamous NSCLC. Merck has a robust clinical development program for KEYTRUDA in lung cancer, with five registration-enabling studies currently underway. The KEYTRUDA clinical development program includes more than 30 tumor types in more than 270 clinical trials, including more than 100 trials that combine KEYTRUDA with other cancer treatments.

About the KEYNOTE-021 Study (Cohorts A-C)

KEYNOTE-021 is a phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, randomized, multi-cohort trial with Cohorts A, B, and C evaluating KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in combination with chemotherapy in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, EGFR- and ALK-negative unresectable or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA every three weeks plus one of several chemotherapy regimens for four cycles – Cohort A (any histology): carboplatin AUC 6 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 followed by maintenance KEYTRUDA; Cohort B (non-squamous histology): carboplatin AUC 6 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg followed by maintenance KEYTRUDA plus bevacizumab; or Cohort C (non-squamous histology): carboplatin AUC 5 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 followed by maintenance KEYTRUDA plus pemetrexed. The primary efficacy outcome measures were ORR as assessed every six weeks for the first 18 weeks, followed by every nine weeks for the remainder of the first year, using RECIST v1.1 by a central imaging vendor. Secondary outcome measures included OS, PFS, and duration of response.

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA-approved test with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not yet been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every three weeks for the approved indications.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab)

Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 19 (3.5%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (1.1%), 3 (1.3%), 4 (0.4%), or 5 (0.2%) pneumonitis and occurred more frequently in patients with a history of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.4%) or prior thoracic radiation (6.0%). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent Grade 2 pneumonitis.

Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 4 (0.7%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%) or 3 (0.4%) colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hypophysitis occurred in 1 (0.2%) of 550 patients, which was Grade 3 in severity. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis (including hypopituitarism and adrenal insufficiency). Administer corticosteroids and hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; withhold or discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 hypophysitis.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 10 (1.8%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (0.7%) or 3 (0.3%) hyperthyroidism. Hypothyroidism occurred in 38 (6.9%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (5.5%) or 3 (0.2%) hypothyroidism. Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. Administer replacement hormones for hypothyroidism and manage hyperthyroidism with thionamides and beta-blockers as appropriate. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 hyperthyroidism.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus, including diabetic ketoacidosis, occurred in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes, and withhold KEYTRUDA and administer anti-hyperglycemics in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Immune-mediated nephritis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Other clinically important immune-mediated adverse reactions can occur. For suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, ensure adequate evaluation to confirm etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold KEYTRUDA and administer corticosteroids. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Based on limited data from clinical studies in patients whose immune-related adverse reactions could not be controlled with corticosteroid use, administration of other systemic immunosuppressants can be considered. Resume KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) when the adverse reaction remains at Grade 1 or less following corticosteroid taper. Permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for any Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse reaction that recurs and for any life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reaction.

The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% of 550 patients: rash, vasculitis, hemolytic anemia, serum sickness, and myasthenia gravis.

Severe and life-threatening infusion-related reactions have been reported in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions including rigors, chills, wheezing, pruritus, flushing, rash, hypotension, hypoxemia, and fever. For Grade 3 or 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. If used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant during treatment, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of KEYTRUDA.

KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 14% of 550 patients. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients were pleural effusion, pneumonia, dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonitis. The most common adverse reactions (reported in at least 20% of patients) were fatigue (44%), cough (29%), decreased appetite (25%), and dyspnea (23%).

No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies have been conducted with KEYTRUDA.

It is not known whether KEYTRUDA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, instruct women to discontinue nursing during treatment with KEYTRUDA and for 4 months after the final dose.

Safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA have not been established in pediatric patients.

Our Focus on Cancer

Our goal is to translate breakthrough science into innovative oncology medicines to help people with cancer worldwide. At Merck Oncology, helping people fight cancer is our passion and supporting accessibility to our cancer medicines is our commitment. Our focus is on pursuing research in immuno-oncology and we are accelerating every step in the journey – from lab to clinic – to potentially bring new hope to people with cancer.

As part of our focus on cancer, Merck is committed to exploring the potential of immuno-oncology with one of the fastest-growing development programs in the industry. We are currently executing an expansive research program that includes more than 270 clinical trials evaluating our anti-PD-1 therapy across more than 30 tumor types. We also continue to strengthen our immuno-oncology portfolio through strategic acquisitions and are prioritizing the development of several promising immunotherapeutic candidates with the potential to improve the treatment of advanced cancers.

For more information about our oncology clinical trials, visit www.merck.com/clinicaltrials.

Opdivo® (nivolumab) and Yervoy® (ipilimumab) Combination Regimen Shows Clinically Meaningful Responses in First-Line Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, In Updated Phase 1b Study CheckMate -012

on June 4, 2016 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) reported updated results from CheckMate -012, a multi-arm, Phase 1b trial evaluating two Immuno-Oncology agents, Opdivo and Yervoy, in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512989]). In this study, Opdivo was administered as monotherapy or as part of a combination with other agents, including Yervoy, at different doses and schedules. Data from the Opdivo monotherapy arm and other cohorts were previously reported. These updated results include findings from a pooled analysis of two Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen cohorts, [3 mg/kg of Opdivo every two weeks plus 1 mg/kg of Yervoy either every six (Q6W) or 12 weeks (Q12W) (n=77)] which showed the magnitude of response rate from the combination regimen was enhanced with increased PD-L1 expression. In these combination regimen cohorts, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in patients with ≥1% PD-L1 expression was 57% and the confirmed ORR was up to 92% (n=12/13) in patients with ≥50% PD-L1 expression. In patients with <1% PD-L1 expression, the confirmed ORR was 15%. The ORR was 47% and 39% for the Q12W and Q6W, respectively in the overall population which included all patients regardless of PD-L1 expression level.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In the study, the rate of treatment related Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 37%, 33%, and 19% for the Q12W, Q6W and Opdivo monotherapy cohorts, respectively. The rate of treatment-related Grade 3/4 AEs leading to discontinuation was 5%, 8%, and 10% of patients in the Q12W, Q6W and Opdivo monotherapy arms, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths.

These data will be presented today at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) during an oral presentation on Saturday, June 4, from 1:27 PM – 1:39 PM CDT (Abstract #3001).

"The results from this study provide important insight into the combination immunotherapy with Opdivo and Yervoy, and supports the potential for this combination as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer," said Matthew D. Hellmann, M.D., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. "The frequency, depth, and durability of responses among patients in this study treated with the combination regimen, and particularly among those with increased PD-L1 expression, are promising. We look forward to additional research of this combination in the first-line setting of patients with non-small cell lung cancer."

Results from CheckMate -012 continue to support the dosing schedule selected – 3 mg/kg of Opdivo every two weeks plus 1 mg/kg of Yervoy every six weeks – for evaluation in further studies, including the Phase 3 trial, CheckMate -227, comparing Opdivo, the Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen or Opdivo and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve Stage IV or recurrent NSCLC.

Jean Viallet, M.D., Global Clinical Research Lead, Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, commented, "We find these Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen results in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer compelling. These data reinforce our approach to identify an optimized combination dosing schedule for further study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. As we continue to advance our Immuno-Oncology clinical research, our goal is to offer patients with first-line lung cancer the potential for improved outcomes."

About CheckMate -012

CheckMate -012 is a multi-arm Phase 1b trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of Opdivo in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as either a monotherapy or in combination with other agents including Yervoy, at different doses and schedules. The primary endpoint of the study was safety with secondary endpoints of objective response rate (ORR) and 24-week progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS) and efficacy by PD-L1 expression. In the study, patients were tested for PD-L1 expression and 68% of patients in the Q12W cohort and 77% of patients in the Q6W cohort expressed PD-L1.

The efficacy and safety results of the three dosing schedules in CheckMate -012 reported at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) are below.

Nivo 3 Q2W
+ Ipi 1 Q12W
(n = 38)
Nivo 3 Q2W
+ Ipi 1 Q6W
(n = 39)
Nivo 3 Q2W
(n = 52)
Confirmed ORR, %
(95% CI)
47
(31, 64) 39
(23, 55) 23*
(13, 37)
Median duration of response, mo (95% CI) NR (11.3, NR) NR (8.4, NR) NR (5.7, NR)
Median length of follow-up, mo (range) 12.9 (0.9–18.0) 11.8 (1.1–18.2) 14.3 (0.2–30.1)
*not randomized

CheckMate -012 also evaluated the efficacy by PD-L1 expression, an exploratory endpoint, of Opdivo as monotherapy (previously reported) and in combination with Yervoy across the Q6W and Q12W dosing schedules. The chart below describes the efficacy results based on PD-L1 expression levels presented today at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper).

Nivo 3 Q2W
+ Ipi 1 Q12W
(n = 38)
Nivo 3 Q2W
+ Ipi 1 Q6W
(n = 39)
Nivo 3 Q2W
(n = 52)
ORR, % (n/N)
<1% PD-L1
≥1% PD-L1
≥50% PD-L1
30 (3/10)
57 (12/21)
100 (6/6)
0 (0/7)
57 (13/23)
86 (6/7)
14 (2/14)
28 (9/32)
50 (6/12)
Median PFS (95% CI), mo
<1% PD-L1
≥1% PD-L1
≥50% PD-L1
4.7 (0.9, NR)
8.1 (5.6, NR)
13.6 (6.4, NR)
2.4 (1.7, 2.9)
10.6 (3.6, NR)
NR (7.8, NR)
6.6 (2.0, 11.2)
3.5 (2.2, 6.6)
8.4 (2.2, NR)
1-year OS rate (95% CI), %
<1% PD-L1
≥1% PD-L1
≥50% PD-L1
NC
90 (66, 97)
NC
NC
83 (60, 93)
100 (100, 100)
69 (50, 82)
79 (47, 93)
83 (48, 96)
The rate of total adverse events in the Q12W (82%) and Q6W (72%) arms were comparable to monotherapy (71%). In the study, Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were 37%, 33%, and 19% for the Q12W, Q6W and Opdivo monotherapy arms, respectively. Treatment-related Grade 3/4 AEs lead to discontinuation in 5% and 8% of patients in the Q12W and Q6W cohorts, respectively and were similar to Opdivo monotherapy. There were no treatment-related deaths. The treatment-related select AEs in patients administered the optimized dosing schedule (3 mg/kg of Opdivo every two weeks plus 1 mg/kg of Yervoy every six weeks) were skin related (36%), gastrointestinal (23%), endocrine (20%), and pulmonary (6%) and there were ≤5% treatment-related Grade 3/4 AEs per category.

About Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths globally, resulting in more than 1.5 million deaths each year, according to the World Health Organization. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common types of the disease and accounts for approximately 85% of cases. About 25% to 30% of all lung cancers are squamous cell carcinomas, and non-squamous NSCLC accounts for approximately 50% to 65% of all lung cancer cases. Survival rates vary depending on the stage and type of the cancer when it is diagnosed. Globally, the five-year survival rate for Stage I NSCLC is between 47% and 50%; for Stage IV NSCLC, the five-year survival rate drops to 2%.

Bristol-Myers Squibb & Immuno-Oncology: Advancing Oncology Research

At Bristol-Myers Squibb, we have a vision for the future of cancer care that is focused on Immuno-Oncology, now considered a major treatment choice alongside surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and targeted therapies for certain types of cancer.

We have a comprehensive clinical portfolio of investigational and approved Immuno-Oncology agents, many of which were discovered and developed by our scientists. Our ongoing Immuno-Oncology clinical program is looking at broad patient populations, across multiple solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, and lines of therapy and histologies, with the intent of powering our trials for overall survival and other important measures like durability of response. We pioneered the research leading to the first regulatory approval for the combination of two Immuno-Oncology agents, and continue to study the role of combinations in cancer.

We are also investigating other immune system pathways in the treatment of cancer including CTLA-4, CD-137, KIR, SLAMF7, PD-1, GITR, CSF1R, IDO, and LAG-3. These pathways may lead to potential new treatment options – in combination or monotherapy – to help patients fight different types of cancers.

Our collaboration with academia, as well as small and large biotech companies, to research the potential Immuno-Oncology and non-Immuno-Oncology combinations, helps achieve our goal of providing new treatment options in clinical practice.

At Bristol-Myers Squibb, we are committed to changing survival expectations in hard-to-treat cancers and the way patients live with cancer.

About Opdivo

Cancer cells may exploit "regulatory" pathways, such as checkpoint pathways, to hide from the immune system and shield the tumor from immune attack. Opdivo is a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor that binds to the checkpoint receptor PD-1 expressed on activated T-cells, and blocks the binding of PD-L1 and PD-L2, preventing the PD-1 pathway’s suppressive signaling on the immune system, including the interference with an anti-tumor immune response.

Opdivo’s broad global development program is based on Bristol-Myers Squibb’s understanding of the biology behind Immuno-Oncology. Our company is at the forefront of researching the potential of Immuno-Oncology to extend survival in hard-to-treat cancers. This scientific expertise serves as the basis for the Opdivo development program, which includes a broad range of Phase 3 clinical trials evaluating overall survival as the primary endpoint across a variety of tumor types. The Opdivo trials have also contributed toward the clinical and scientific understanding of the role of biomarkers and how patients may benefit from Opdivo across the continuum of PD-L1 expression. To date, the Opdivo clinical development program has enrolled more than 18,000 patients.

Opdivo was the first PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive regulatory approval anywhere in the world in July 2014, and currently has regulatory approval in 51 countries including the United States, Japan, and in the European Union.

U.S. FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS FOR OPDIVO

OPDIVO (nivolumab) as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and post- transplantation brentuximab vedotin. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

Please refer to the end of the Important Safety Information for a brief description of the patient populations studied in the trials.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNING: IMMUNE-MEDIATED ADVERSE REACTIONS

YERVOY can result in severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions. These immune- mediated reactions may involve any organ system; however, the most common severe immune- mediated adverse reactions are enterocolitis, hepatitis, dermatitis (including toxic epidermal necrolysis), neuropathy, and endocrinopathy. The majority of these immune-mediated reactions initially manifested during treatment; however, a minority occurred weeks to months after discontinuation of YERVOY.

Assess patients for signs and symptoms of enterocolitis, dermatitis, neuropathy, and endocrinopathy and evaluate clinical chemistries including liver function tests (LFTs), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function tests at baseline and before each dose.

Permanently discontinue YERVOY and initiate systemic high-dose corticosteroid therapy for severe immune-mediated reactions.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

Immune-mediated pneumonitis, including fatal cases, occurred with OPDIVO treatment. Across the clinical trial experience with solid tumors, fatal immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred with OPDIVO. In addition, in 069, there were six patients who died without resolution of abnormal respiratory findings. Monitor patients for signs with radiographic imaging and symptoms of pneumonitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 and withhold until resolution for Grade 2. In 069 and 067, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 6% (25/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Fatal (n=1), Grade 3 (n=6), Grade 2 (n=17), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 037, 066, and 067, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 1.8% (14/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2) and Grade 2 (n=12). In 057, immune- mediated pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 3.4% (10/287) of patients: Grade 3 (n=5), Grade 2 (n=2), and Grade 1 (n=3). In 025, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 5% (21/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 18% (73/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.4% (18/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 4 (n=1), Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=12), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 205 and 039, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 4.9% (13/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.4% (9/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 2 (n=8).

Immune-Mediated Colitis

Immune-mediated colitis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 (of more than 5 days duration), 3, or 4 colitis. As a single agent, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 or recurrent colitis upon restarting OPDIVO. When administered with YERVOY, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent colitis upon restarting OPDIVO. In 069 and 067, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 56% (228/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 26% (107/407) of patients: Grade 4 (n=2), Grade 3 (n=60), Grade 2 (n=32), and Grade 1 (n=13). In 037, 066, and 067, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 31% (242/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 4.1% (32/787) of patients: Grade 3 (n=20), Grade 2 (n=10), and Grade 1 (n=2). In 057, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 17% (50/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.4% (7/287) of patients: Grade 3 (n=3), Grade 2 (n=2), and Grade 1 (n=2). In 025, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 25% (100/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 32% (126/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune-mediated diarrhea or colitis occurred in 3.2% (13/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=5), Grade 2 (n=7), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 205 and 039, diarrhea or colitis occurred in 30% (80/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated diarrhea (Grade 3) occurred in 1.1% (3/263) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal (diarrhea of ≥7 stools above baseline, fever, ileus, peritoneal signs; Grade 3-5) immune-mediated enterocolitis occurred in 34 (7%) patients. Across all YERVOY-treated patients in that study (n=511), 5 (1%) developed intestinal perforation, 4 (0.8%) died as a result of complications, and 26 (5%) were hospitalized for severe enterocolitis.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

Immune-mediated hepatitis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for abnormal liver tests prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater transaminase elevations. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 immune- mediated hepatitis. In 069 and 067, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 13% (51/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 4 (n=8), Grade 3 (n=37), Grade 2 (n=5), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 037, 066, and 067, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 2.3% (18/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 4 (n=3), Grade 3 (n=11), and Grade 2 (n=4). In 057, one patient (0.3%) developed immune-mediated hepatitis. In 025, there was an increased incidence of liver test abnormalities compared to baseline in AST (33% vs 39%), alkaline phosphatase (32% vs 32%), ALT (22% vs 31%), and total bilirubin (9% vs 3.5%) in the OPDIVO and everolimus arms, respectively. Immune-mediated hepatitis requiring systemic immunosuppression occurred in 1.5% (6/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=5) and Grade 2 (n=1). In 205 and 039, hepatitis occurred in 11% (30/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 3.4% (9/263): Grade 3 (n=7) and Grade 2 (n=2).

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal hepatotoxicity (AST or ALT elevations >5x the ULN or total bilirubin elevations >3x the ULN; Grade 3-5) occurred in 8 (2%) patients, with fatal hepatic failure in 0.2% and hospitalization in 0.4%.

Immune-Mediated Dermatitis

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal immune-mediated dermatitis (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or rash complicated by full thickness dermal ulceration, or necrotic, bullous, or hemorrhagic manifestations; Grade 3-5) occurred in 13 (2.5%) patients. 1 (0.2%) patient died as a result of toxic epidermal necrolysis. 1 additional patient required hospitalization for severe dermatitis.

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, 1 case of fatal Guillain-Barré syndrome and 1 case of severe (Grade 3) peripheral motor neuropathy were reported.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

Hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, thyroid disorders, and type 1 diabetes mellitus can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis, signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency during and after treatment, thyroid function prior to and periodically during treatment, and hyperglycemia. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hypophysitis. Withhold for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hypophysitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Administer hormone-replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. Initiate medical management for control of hyperthyroidism. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hyperglycemia.

In 069 and 067, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (36/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 3 (n=8), Grade 2 (n=25), and Grade 1 (n=3). In 037, 066, and 067, hypophysitis occurred in 0.9% (7/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 1 (n=2). In 025, hypophysitis occurred in 0.5% (2/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 1 (n=1). In 069 and 067, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5% (21/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 4 (n=1), Grade 3 (n=7), Grade 2 (n=11), and Grade 1 (n=2). In 037, 066, and 067, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (8/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=5), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 057, 0.3% (1/287) of OPDIVO-treated patients developed adrenal insufficiency. In 025, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 2.0% (8/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=3), Grade 2 (n=4), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 205 and 039, adrenal insufficiency (Grade 2) occurred in 0.4% (1/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. In 069 and 067, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis occurred in 22% (89/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 3 (n=6), Grade 2 (n=47), and Grade 1 (n=36). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 8% (34/407) of patients: Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=17), and Grade 1 (n=13). In 037, 066, and 067, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis occurred in 9% (73/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1), Grade 2 (n=37), Grade 1 (n=35). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 4.4% (35/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1), Grade 2 (n=12), and Grade 1 (n=22). In 057, Grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism, including thyroiditis, occurred in 7% (20/287) and elevated thyroid stimulating hormone occurred in 17% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 1 or 2 hyperthyroidism occurred in 1.4% (4/287) of patients. In 025, thyroid disease occurred in 11% (43/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO, including one Grade 3 event, and in 3.0% (12/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Hypothyroidism/thyroiditis occurred in 8% (33/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=17), and Grade 1 (n=14). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.5% (10/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 2 (n=5) and Grade 1 (n=5). In 205 and 039, hypothyroidism/thyroiditis occurred in 12% (32/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 2 (n=18) and Grade 1: (n=14). Hyperthyroidism occurred in 1.5% (4/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 2: (n=3) and Grade 1 (n=1). In 069 and 067, diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 1.5% (6/407) of patients: Grade 4 (n=3), Grade 3 (n=1), Grade 2 (n=1), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 037, 066, and 067, diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 0.8% (6/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 025, hyperglycemic adverse events occurred in 9% (37/406) patients.

Diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 1.5% (6/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=3), Grade 2 (n=2), and Grade 1 (n=1). In 205 and 039, diabetes mellitus occurred in 0.8% (2/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 1 (n=1).

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe to life-threatening immune-mediated endocrinopathies (requiring hospitalization, urgent medical intervention, or interfering with activities of daily living; Grade 3-4) occurred in 9 (1.8%) patients. All 9 patients had hypopituitarism, and some had additional concomitant endocrinopathies such as adrenal insufficiency, hypogonadism, and hypothyroidism. 6 of the 9 patients were hospitalized for severe endocrinopathies.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

Immune-mediated nephritis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Monitor patients for elevated serum creatinine prior to and periodically during treatment. For Grade 2 or 3 increased serum creatinine, withhold and administer corticosteroids; if worsening or no improvement occurs, permanently discontinue. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 4 serum creatinine elevation and permanently discontinue. In 069 and 067, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 2.2% (9/407) of patients: Grade 4 (n=4), Grade 3 (n=3), and Grade 2 (n=2). In 037, 066, and 067, nephritis and renal dysfunction of any grade occurred in 5% (40/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 0.8% (6/787) of patients: Grade 3 (n=4) and Grade 2 (n=2). In 057, Grade 2 immune-mediated renal dysfunction occurred in 0.3% (1/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO. In 025, renal injury occurred in 7% (27/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 3.0% (12/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 3.2% (13/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 5 (n=1), Grade 4 (n=1), Grade 3 (n=5), and Grade 2 (n=6). In 205 and 039, nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 4.9% (13/263) of patients treated with OPDIVO. This included one reported case (0.3%) of Grade 3 autoimmune nephritis.

Immune-Mediated Rash

Immune-mediated rash can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Severe rash (including rare cases of fatal toxic epidermal necrolysis) occurred in the clinical program of OPDIVO. Monitor patients for rash. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 rash. Withhold for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4. In 069 and 067, immune-mediated rash occurred in 22.6% (92/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 3 (n=15), Grade 2 (n=31), and Grade 1 (n=46). In 037, 066, and 067, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (72/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=7), Grade 2 (n=15), and Grade 1 (n=50). In 057, immune-mediated rash occurred in 6% (17/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO including four Grade 3 cases. In 025, rash occurred in 28% (112/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 36% (143/397) of patients receiving everolimus. Immune- mediated rash, defined as a rash treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids, occurred in 7% (30/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=7), and Grade 1 (n=19). In 205 and 039, rash occurred in 22% (58/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated rash occurred in 7% (18/263) of patients on OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=4), Grade 2 (n=3), and Grade 1 (n=11).

Immune-Mediated Encephalitis

Immune-mediated encephalitis can occur with OPDIVO treatment. Withhold OPDIVO in patients with new-onset moderate to severe neurologic signs or symptoms and evaluate to rule out other causes. If other etiologies are ruled out, administer corticosteroids and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for immune-mediated encephalitis. In 067, encephalitis was identified in one patient (0.2%) receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY. In 057, fatal limbic encephalitis occurred in one patient (0.3%) receiving OPDIVO. In 205 and 039, encephalitis occurred in 0.8% (2/263) of patients after allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Based on the severity of adverse reaction, permanently discontinue or withhold treatment, administer high-dose corticosteroids, and, if appropriate, initiate hormone-replacement therapy. In < 1.0% of patients receiving OPDIVO, the following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred: uveitis, iritis, pancreatitis, facial and abducens nerve paresis, demyelination, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypopituitarism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastritis, duodenitis, and sarcoidosis. Across clinical trials of OPDIVO as a single agent administered at doses of 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, additional clinically significant, immune- mediated adverse reactions were identified: motor dysfunction, vasculitis, and myasthenic syndrome.

Infusion Reactions

Severe infusion reactions have been reported in <1.0% of patients in clinical trials of OPDIVO. Discontinue OPDIVO in patients with Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with Grade 1 or 2. In 069 and 067, infusion- related reactions occurred in 2.5% (10/407) of patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY: Grade 2 (n=6) and Grade 1 (n=4). In 037, 066, and 067, Grade 2 infusion related reactions occurred in 2.7% (21/787) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=8), and Grade 1 (n=11). In 057, Grade 2 infusion reactions requiring corticosteroids occurred in 1.0% (3/287) of patients receiving OPDIVO. In 025, hypersensitivity/infusion-related reactions occurred in 6% (25/406) of patients receiving OPDIVO and 1.0% (4/397) of patients receiving everolimus. In 205 and 039, hypersensitivity/infusion- related reactions occurred in 16% (42/263) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=2), Grade 2 (n=24), and Grade 1 (n=16).

Complications of Allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO

Complications, including fatal events, occurred in patients who received allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO. Outcomes were evaluated in 17 patients from 205 and 039, who underwent allogeneic HSCT after discontinuing OPDIVO (15 with reduced-intensity conditioning, 2 with myeloablative conditioning). Thirty-five percent (6/17) of patients died from complications of allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO. Five deaths occurred in the setting of severe or refractory GVHD. Grade 3 or higher acute GVHD was reported in 29% (5/17) of patients. Hyperacute GVHD was reported in 20% (n=2) of patients. A steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, without an identified infectious cause, was reported in 35% (n=6) of patients. Two cases of encephalitis were reported: Grade 3 (n=1) lymphocytic encephalitis without an identified infectious cause, and Grade 3 (n=1) suspected viral encephalitis. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in one patient, who received reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic SCT and died of GVHD and multi-organ failure. Other cases of hepatic VOD after reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic HSCT have also been reported in patients with lymphoma who received a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody before transplantation. Cases of fatal hyperacute GVHD have also been reported. These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between PD-1 blockade and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for early evidence of transplant-related complications such as hyperacute GVHD, severe (Grade 3 to 4) acute GVHD, steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, hepatic VOD, and other immune- mediated adverse reactions, and intervene promptly.

Embryo-fetal Toxicity

Based on their mechanisms of action, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with an OPDIVO- or YERVOY- containing regimen and for at least 5 months after the last dose of OPDIVO.

Lactation

It is not known whether OPDIVO or YERVOY is present in human milk. Because many drugs, including antibodies, are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from an OPDIVO-containing regimen, advise women to discontinue breastfeeding during treatment. Advise women to discontinue nursing during treatment with YERVOY and for 3 months following the final dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In 067, serious adverse reactions (73% and 37%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (43% and 14%) or to dosing delays (55% and 28%), and Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (72% and 44%) all occurred more frequently in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm relative to the OPDIVO arm. The most frequent (≥10%) serious adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm and the OPDIVO arm, respectively, were diarrhea (13% and 2.6%), colitis (10% and 1.6%), and pyrexia (10% and 0.6%). In 037, serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 42% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions reported in 2% to <5% of patients receiving OPDIVO were abdominal pain, hyponatremia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased lipase. In 066, serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients receiving OPDIVO. Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (3.9%) and diarrhea (3.4%). In 057, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, dyspnea, pleural effusion, and respiratory failure. In 025, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were acute kidney injury, pleural effusion, pneumonia, diarrhea, and hypercalcemia. In 205 and 039, among all patients (safety population [n=263]), adverse reactions leading to discontinuation (4.2%) or to dosing delays (23%) occurred. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥1% of patients were infusion-related reaction, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pyrexia, rash and pneumonitis. Ten patients died from causes other than disease progression, including 6 who died from complications of allogeneic HSCT. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 21% of patients in the safety population (n=263) and 27% of patients in the subset of patients evaluated for efficacy (efficacy population [n=95]).

Common Adverse Reactions

In 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm were fatigue (59%), rash (53%), diarrhea (52%), nausea (40%), pyrexia (37%), vomiting (28%), and dyspnea (20%). The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO arm were fatigue (53%), rash (40%), diarrhea (31%), and nausea (28%). In 037, the most common adverse reaction (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO was rash (21%). In 066, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO vs dacarbazine were fatigue (49% vs 39%), musculoskeletal pain (32% vs 25%), rash (28% vs 12%), and pruritus (23% vs 12%). In 057, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO were fatigue (49%), musculoskeletal pain (36%), cough (30%), decreased appetite (29%), and constipation (23%). In 025, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO vs everolimus were asthenic conditions (56% vs 57%), cough (34% vs 38%), nausea (28% vs 29%), rash (28% vs 36%), dyspnea (27% vs 31%), diarrhea (25% vs 32%), constipation (23% vs 18%), decreased appetite (23% vs 30%), back pain (21% vs 16%), and arthralgia (20% vs 14%). In 205 and 039, among all patients (safety population [n=263]) and the subset of patients in the efficacy population (n=95), respectively, the most common adverse reactions (reported in at least 20%) were fatigue (32% and 43%), upper respiratory tract infection (28% and 48%), pyrexia (24% and 35%), diarrhea (23% and 30%), and cough (22% and 35%). In the subset of patients in the efficacy population (n=95), the most common adverse reactions also included rash (31%), musculoskeletal pain (27%), pruritus (25%), nausea (23%), arthralgia (21%), and peripheral neuropathy (21%).

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, the most common adverse reactions (≥5%) in patients who received YERVOY at 3 mg/kg were fatigue (41%), diarrhea (32%), pruritus (31%), rash (29%), and colitis (8%).

Trials and Patient Populations

CheckMate 069 and 067 – advanced melanoma alone or in combination with YERVOY; CheckMate 037 and 066 – advanced melanoma; CheckMate 057 – non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); CheckMate 025 – renal cell carcinoma; CheckMate 205/039 – classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Halozyme Presents Stage One Efficacy And Safety Analysis Of Phase 2 Clinical Study In Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated With PEGPH20

On June 4, 2016 Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: HALO), a biotechnology company developing novel oncology and drug-delivery therapies, repprted results from a final analysis of 135 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were treated in Stage One of HALO 109-202, a phase 2 clinical study of its investigational new drug PEGPH20 in combination with ABRAXANE (nab-paclitaxel) and gemcitabine (PAG arm) as compared to ABRAXANE and gemcitabine alone (AG arm) (Press release, Halozyme, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513006]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

This final analysis of secondary and exploratory endpoints was conducted using the Ventana companion diagnostic to retrospectively identify high levels of hyaluronan (HA). The key results based on a February 2016 data cut-off showed in the HA-high patient population:

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 months in the PAG arm versus 6.0 months in the AG arm, hazard ratio (HR) with a 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.46 (0.15, 1.40);
Overall response rate (ORR) of 50 percent, including one complete response in the PAG arm versus 33 percent and all partial responses in the AG arm;
Median duration of response (DoR) of 8.1 months in the PAG arm versus 3.7 months in the AG arm;
The exploratory analysis of median overall survival (OS) was similar between the treatment arms — 11.8 months vs. 10.9 months in the PAG vs. AG arms respectively. Factors potentially having an impact on these results include less aggressive disease among patients in the AG arm and a greater than 40 percent discontinuation rate of PEGPH20 treatment at the time of the clinical hold, resulting in all patients receiving AG alone in both arms;
The rate of thromboembolic (TE) events reduced from 43 percent to 9 percent in the PAG arm and from 25 percent to 6 percent in the AG arm with the introduction of prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) from Stage One to Stage Two of the study.
"We are encouraged by the positive trends in this final Stage One dataset, even with PEGPH20 treatment being discontinued for more than 40 percent of patients in the PAG arm due to the prior clinical hold," said Dr. Athena Countouriotis, senior vice president and chief medical officer. "The safety profile continues to show the benefit of prophylactic enoxaparin use and the dataset continues to support our ongoing phase 3 study."

Prior interim analyses were based on patient follow up through December 2014. Results announced today include 14 months of additional follow up through February 2016. Stage One of HALO 202 enrolled a total of 146 patients between May 2013 to July 2014. The study was placed on clinical hold from April to July 2014 during which time PEGPH20 was discontinued while patients in both arms continued to receive treatment with ABRAXANE and gemcitabine alone. Stage Two enrolled a total of 133 patients as of February 2016 and Halozyme remains blinded to the overall efficacy. The company projects to report mature PFS and ORR results from Stage Two late in the fourth quarter.

Dr. Andrea Bullock, attending physician in Gastrointestinal Oncology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and an Instructor in Medicine at Harvard University said: "As one of the highest enrollers in the HALO 202 study, I am encouraged by the final data from Stage One in the HA-high patients. While the sample size remains small, the median PFS and ORR continue to favor the PEGPH20 combination treatment arm compared to the standard of care AG arm. I look forward to the Stage Two results later this year and to participating in the phase 3 global study very soon."

Halozyme’s ongoing phase 3 study, HALO 301, uses the Ventana companion diagnostic to prospectively identify HA-high patients and mirrors the design of the phase 2 study including the current inclusion/exclusion criteria; 2:1 randomization; and dosing regimens. This double-blinded placebo-controlled study plans to enroll a total of 420 patients at approximately 200 centers within 20 countries. The co-primary endpoints are PFS and OS, with a target hazard ratio of 0.59 for PFS, which is well supported by the final results from Stage One of HALO 202.

Halozyme is the only oncology biotech targeting HA, a glycosaminoglycan – or chain of natural sugars throughout the body – that can accumulate around cancer cells inhibiting other therapies. PEGPH20 is designed to degrade HA to improve the access to tumor cells for chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies and other immuno-therapy agents.

About HALO 301
HALO 301 is a phase 3 global, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial evaluating investigational new drug PEGPH20 as a first-line therapy for potential treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The trial will be conducted at approximately 200 sites with two co-primary endpoints of progression free survival and overall survival in patients receiving investigational new drug PEGPH20 in combination with gemcitabine and ABRAXANE (nab-paclitaxel) compared to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone. Secondary endpoints also include objective response rate and overall survival. More information may be found at clinicaltrials.gov (search HALO 301 or trial identifier NCT02715804) or www.HALO301.com.

About PEGPH20
PEGPH20 is an investigational PEGylated form of Halozyme’s proprietary recombinant human hyaluronidase under clinical development for the potential systemic treatment of tumors that accumulate hyaluronan.

FDA granted orphan drug designation to PEGPH20 for treatment of pancreatic cancer and fast track for PEGPH20 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Additionally, the European Commission, acting on the recommendation from the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products of the European Medicines Agency, designated investigational drug PEGPH20 an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.