Cascadian Therapeutics Announces Presentation of Tucatinib in Combination Therapy in Patients with Cutaneous HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

On October 10, 2016 Cascadian Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CASC), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, reported the presentation of clinical activity of tucatinib, its investigational, highly selective small molecule HER2 inhibitor, in combination therapy at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress being held October 7-11, 2016 in Copenhagen, Denmark (Press release, Cascadian Therapeutics, OCT 10, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515695]).
Data from the poster presentation (#278 "Cutaneous Responses in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer in Phase 1b Study of Tucatinib (ONT-380), an Oral HER2-Specific Inhibitor in Combination with Capecitabine and/or Trastuzumab in Third Line or Later Treatment"), reported on responses of skin lesions in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients following treatment with tucatinib in combination with capecitabine and/or trastuzumab.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Data suggest that skin may be a sanctuary site for metastatic breast cancer similar to the brain and therefore poorly penetrated by drug therapies that could help control cancer," commented Dr. Alison Conlin, study author and Medical Oncologist at Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR. "As a result, any meaningful improvement in patients’ skin metastases would be a welcome development, particularly given the morbidity that these skin metastases cause. Tucatinib, when used in combination, appears to show early evidence of activity in treating cutaneous HER2+ metastases, a common yet difficult-to-treat aspect of this disease."

Summary of Results
Dr. Conlin reported on eight patients with HER2+ metastases to the skin who received the maximum tolerated tucatinib dose in combination with capecitabine and/or trastuzumab from the Company’s Phase 1b combination study. All patients in this study had previously been treated with trastuzumab, a taxane, and T-DM1. Most patients had also received lapatinib, pertuzumab, and/or radiotherapy to the skin. Patients had previously received a median of six lines of drug therapy.

Overall systemic clinical responses reported in this patient population included one complete response, three partial responses and four with stable disease. Responses observed in skin lesions in these patients included one complete response, four partial responses and three patients with stable disease, including one partial response of a patient receiving tucatinib and trastuzumab only.1 Tucatinib was previously reported to be well tolerated by patients in the Phase 1b combination studies, with a manageable adverse event profile.

"We’re pleased to see continued evidence of systemic clinical activity with tucatinib in combination therapy, including in patients with difficult-to-treat metastases such as these," commented Luke N. Walker, MD, Vice President, Clinical Development, Cascadian Therapeutics. "This potential benefit of tucatinib for patients with skin metastases is an interesting finding that we will continue to monitor."

A copy of the poster can be found in the Clinical Data and Scientific Publications section of the Company’s website at www.cascadianrx.com.

1 Partial responses in the skin were defined as a greater than 30 percent reduction in the sum of diameters of all target skin lesions from baseline while a complete response was defined as a disappearance of all skin lesions.

New Retrospective Analyses Confirm Vectibix® (Panitumumab) Treatment Provided Survival Benefit Over Chemotherapy With Or Without Bevacizumab In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Tumors Of Left-Sided Origin

On October 10, 2016 Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) reported results from new retrospective analyses of key studies with Vectibix (panitumumab) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (Press release, Amgen, OCT 10, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2210460 [SID:SID1234515706]). The retrospective analysis of the PEAK study in mCRC patients with RAS wild-type primary tumors of left-sided origin showed that patients receiving Vectibix plus FOLFOX6 as first-line treatment achieved 43.4 months median overall survival (OS), an increase of 11.4 months when compared to FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab. Additionally, for this patient population, the retrospective analysis of the PRIME study showed Vectibix plus FOLFOX4 increased OS by 6.7 months when compared to FOLFOX4 alone. These data were presented today at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress in Copenhagen (Abstract #89P).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The PEAK and PRIME retrospective analyses, respectively, also showed that mCRC patients with RAS wild-type tumors of left-sided origin receiving Vectibix plus FOLFOX chemotherapy achieved median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months, an increase of 3.1 months when compared to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab, and 12.9 months, an increase of 3.7 months when compared to FOLFOX chemotherapy alone.

The retrospective analyses found that approximately 80 percent of tumors originate in the left side of the colon. Additionally, tumors originating in the right side of the colon are currently associated with a poorer prognosis than tumors originating in the left side of the colon. In patients with RAS wild-type mCRC with tumors originating on the right side, a subgroup of patients responded to Vectibix and chemotherapy, achieving numerically higher response rates over chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. However, no final conclusions can be made regarding the ability to differentiate treatment regimens for patients with right-sided tumors. The safety profile of the use of Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy in mCRC has been previously reported (see summary of EU product safety information below). The aggregate safety data is unchanged by this retrospective analysis of outcomes based on CRC tumor site of origin.

"Data from these retrospective analyses are helping Amgen make important connections between tumor biology and treatment outcomes," said Sean E. Harper, M.D., executive vice president of Research and Development at Amgen. "Tumor sidedness is a surrogate for differences in tumor biology and mutation load, potentially providing physicians with another means to help inform the treatment decisions for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in women and the third in men worldwide, with approximately 1.4 million new cases occurring globally each year. In Europe, it is the second most common cancer, with more than 470,000 new cases each year.1 Approximately 80 percent of all colorectal cancers originate in the left side of the colon and 20 percent originate in the right side.2

Abstracts are currently available on the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) website.

About the PRIME Study
PRIME was a randomized Phase 3 open-label study of first-line Vectibix and FOLFOX4 combination therapy versus FOLFOX4 monotherapy in 1,183 adults with untreated mCRC who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS.

Of the 1,183 patients enrolled in PRIME, 505 had RAS wild-type mCRC, of whom 456 were included in the quality of life analysis (Vectibix and FOLFOX4, n=232; FOLFOX4, n=224). The meta-analysis included PRIME data from 440 patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who were evaluable for OS and early tumor shrinkage (ETS).

About the PEAK Study
PEAK was a randomized Phase 2 open-label study of first-line Vectibix and FOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab and FOLFOX6 in 285 RAS wild-type mCRC patients. The primary endpoint was PFS. The meta-analysis included PEAK data from 154 patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who were evaluable for OS and ETS.

About the ‘181 Study
The ‘181 study was a randomized Phase 3 open-label study comparing Vectibix and FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatments in 1,186 wild-type KRAS (exon 2) mCRC patients who progressed on one prior fluoropyrimidine-based mCRC therapy. The co-primary endpoints were PFS and OS.

About Vectibix (panitumumab) in Europe
Vectibix is a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody approved by the European Commission (EC) for the treatment of mCRC.3 The safety and efficacy of Vectibix have not been studied in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.3 Vectibix was approved by the EC in December 2007 as a monotherapy for the treatment of patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC with non-mutated (wild-type) KRAS genes after failure of standard chemotherapy regimens.4

In April 2015, the EC approved a new use of Vectibix as first-line treatment in combination with FOLFIRI for the treatment of adult patients with RAS wild-type mCRC.5 In November 2011, the EC expanded the marketing authorization to include indications for the treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC in first-line in combination with FOLFOX and in second-line in combination with FOLFIRI in patients who have received first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (excluding irinotecan).6

Globally, over 240,000 patients have been treated with Vectibix and more than 6,000 patients have participated in Amgen-sponsored panitumumab clinical trials.7

EU Product Safety Information

Summary of safety profile
Based on an analysis of all mCRC clinical trial patients receiving Vectibix monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy (n = 2,588), the most commonly reported adverse reactions are skin reactions occurring in 93% of patients. These reactions are related to the pharmacologic effects of Vectibix, and the majority are mild to moderate in nature with 25% severe (grade 3 NCI-CTC) and < 1% life threatening (grade 4 NCI-CTC). For clinical management of skin reactions, including dose modification recommendations, see section 4.4. Very commonly reported adverse reactions occurring in ≥ 20% of patients were gastrointestinal disorders [diarrhoea (50%), nausea (41%), vomiting (27%), constipation (23%) and abdominal pain (23%)]; general disorders [fatigue (37%), pyrexia (20%)]; metabolism and nutrition disorders [anorexia (27%)]; infections and infestations [paronychia (20%)]; and skin and subcutaneous disorders [rash (45%), dermatitis acneiform (39%), pruritus (35%), erythema (30%) and dry skin (22%)].

Special warnings and precautions for use
Dermatologic reactions and soft tissue toxicity
Dermatologic related reactions, a pharmacologic effect observed with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, are experienced with nearly all patients (approximately 90%) treated with Vectibix. Severe (NCI-CTC grade 3) skin reactions were reported in 34% and life-threatening (NCICTC grade 4) skin reactions in < 1% of patients who received Vectibix in combination with chemotherapy (n = 1,536) (see section 4.8). If a patient develops dermatologic reactions that are grade 3 (CTCAE v 4.0) or higher, or that are considered intolerable, the following dose modification is recommended:

Occurrence of skin symptom(s): ≥ grade 31
Administration of Vectibix
Outcome
Dose regulation
Initial occurrence
Withhold 1 or 2 doses
Improved (< grade 3)
Continuing infusion at 100% of original dose
Not recovered
Discontinue
At the second occurrence
Withhold 1 or 2 doses
Improved (< grade 3)
Continuing infusion at 80% of original dose
Not recovered
Discontinue
At the third occurrence
Withhold 1 or 2 doses
Improved (< grade 3)
Continuing infusion at 60% of original dose
Not recovered
Discontinue
At the fourth occurrence
Discontinue


1Greater than or equal to grade 3 is defined as severe or life-threatening

In clinical studies, subsequent to the development of severe dermatologic reactions (including stomatitis), infectious complications including sepsis and necrotising fasciitis, in rare cases leading to death, and local abscesses requiring incisions and drainage were reported. Patients who have severe dermatologic reactions or soft tissue toxicity or who develop worsening reactions whilst receiving Vectibix should be monitored for the development of inflammatory or infectious sequelae (including cellulitis and necrotising fasciitis), and appropriate treatment promptly initiated. Life threatening and fatal infectious complications including necrotising fasciitis and sepsis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Rare cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis have been reported in patients treated with Vectibix in the post-marketing setting. Withhold or discontinue Vectibix in the event of dermatologic or soft tissue toxicity associated with severe or life threatening inflammatory or infectious complications.

Treatment of dermatologic reactions should be based on severity and may include a moisturiser, sun screen (SPF > 15 UVA and UVB), and topical steroid cream (not stronger than 1% hydrocortisone) applied to affected areas, and/or oral antibiotics. It is also recommended that patients experiencing rash/dermatological toxicities wear sunscreen and hats and limit sun exposure as sunlight can exacerbate any skin reactions that may occur.

Proactive skin treatment including skin moisturiser, sun screen (SPF > 15 UVA and UVB), topical steroid cream (not stronger than 1% hydrocortisone) and an oral antibiotic (e.g. doxycycline) may be useful in the management of dermatologic reactions. Patients may be advised to apply moisturiser and sunscreen to face, hands, feet, neck, back and chest every morning during treatment, and to apply the topical steroid to face, hands, feet, neck, back and chest every night during treatment.

Pulmonary complications
Patients with a history of, or evidence of, interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis were excluded from clinical studies. Cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD), both fatal and non-fatal, have been reported, mainly from the Japanese population. In the event of acute onset or worsening pulmonary symptoms, Vectibix treatment should be interrupted and a prompt investigation of these symptoms should occur. If ILD is diagnosed, Vectibix should be permanently discontinued and the patient should be treated appropriately. In patients with a history of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, the benefits of therapy with panitumumab versus the risk of pulmonary complications must be carefully considered.

Electrolyte disturbances
Progressively decreasing serum magnesium levels leading to severe (grade 4) hypomagnesaemia have been observed in some patients. Patients should be periodically monitored for hypomagnesaemia and accompanying hypocalcaemia prior to initiating Vectibix treatment, and periodically thereafter for up 5 to 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Magnesium repletion is recommended, as appropriate.

Other electrolyte disturbances, including hypokalaemia, have also been observed. Monitoring as above and repletion as appropriate of these electrolytes is also recommended.

Infusion related reactions
Across monotherapy and combination mCRC clinical studies (n = 2,588), infusion-related reactions (occurring within 24 hours of an infusion) were reported in approximately 4% of Vectibix-treated patients, of which < 1% were severe (NCI-CTC grade 3 and grade 4).

In the post-marketing setting, serious infusion-related reactions have been reported, including rare post-marketing reports with a fatal outcome. If a severe or life-threatening reaction occurs during an infusion or at any time post-infusion [e.g. presence of bronchospasm, angioedema, hypotension, need for parenteral treatment, or anaphylaxis], Vectibix should be permanently discontinued.

In patients experiencing a mild or moderate (CTCAE v 4.0 grades 1 and 2) infusion-related reaction the infusion rate should be reduced for the duration of that infusion. It is recommended to maintain this lower infusion rate in all subsequent infusions.

Hypersensitivity reactions occurring more than 24 hours after infusion have been reported including a fatal case of angioedema that occurred more than 24 hours after the infusion. Patients should be informed of the possibility of a late onset reaction and instructed to contact their physician if symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction occur.

Acute renal failure
Acute renal failure has been observed in patients who develop severe diarrhoea and dehydration. Patients who experience severe diarrhoea should be instructed to consult a healthcare professional urgently.

Vectibix in combination with irinotecan, bolus 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) chemotherapy
Patients receiving Vectibix in combination with the IFL regimen [bolus 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), leucovorin (20 mg/m2) and irinotecan (125 mg/m2)] experienced a high incidence of severe diarrhoea. Therefore administration of Vectibix in combination with IFL should be avoided.

Vectibix in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy regimens
A randomised, open-label, multicentre study of 1,053 patients evaluated the efficacy of bevacizumab and oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing chemotherapeutic regimens with and without Vectibix in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Shortened progression free survival time and increased deaths were observed in the patients receiving Vectibix in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. A greater frequency of pulmonary embolism, infections (predominantly of dermatologic origin), diarrhoea, electrolyte imbalances, nausea, vomiting and dehydration was also observed in the treatment arms using Vectibix in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. An additional analysis of efficacy data by KRAS status did not identify a subset of patients who benefited from Vectibix in combination with oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. A trend towards worse survival was observed with Vectibix in the wild-type KRAS subset of the bevacizumab and oxaliplatin cohort, and a trend towards worse survival was observed with Vectibix in the bevacizumab and irinotecan cohort regardless of KRAS mutational status. Therefore, Vectibix should not be administered in combination with bevacizumab containing chemotherapy.

Vectibix in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with mutant RAS mCRC or for whom RAS tumour status is unknown
The combination of Vectibix with oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy is contraindicated for patients with mutant RAS mCRC or for whom RAS mCRC status is unknown.

In the primary analysis of a study (n = 1,183, 656 patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2) and 440 patients with mutant KRAS tumours) evaluating panitumumab in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) compared to FOLFOX alone as first-line therapy for mCRC, a shortened progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time were observed in patients with mutant KRAS tumours who received panitumumab and FOLFOX (n = 221) vs. FOLFOX alone (n = 219).

A predefined retrospective subset analysis of 641 patients of the 656 patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2) tumours from this study identified additional RAS (KRAS [exons 3 and 4] or NRAS [exons 2, 3, 4]) mutations in 16% (n = 108) of patients. A shortening of PFS and OS was observed in patients with mutant RAS tumours who received panitumumab and FOLFOX (n = 51) versus FOLFOX alone (n = 57).

RAS mutational status should be determined using a validated test method by an experienced laboratory (see section 4.2). If Vectibix is to be used in combination with FOLFOX then it is recommended that mutational status be determined by a laboratory that participates in a RAS External Quality Assurance programme or wild-type status be confirmed in a duplicate test.

Ocular toxicities
Serious cases of keratitis and ulcerative keratitis have been rarely reported in the post-marketing setting. Patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of keratitis such as acute or worsening: eye inflammation, lacrimation, light sensitivity, blurred vision, eye pain and/or red eye should be referred promptly to an ophthalmology specialist.

If a diagnosis of ulcerative keratitis is confirmed, treatment with Vectibix should be interrupted or discontinued. If keratitis is diagnosed, the benefits and risks of continuing treatment should be carefully considered.

Vectibix should be used with caution in patients with a history of keratitis, ulcerative keratitis or severe dry eye. Contact lens use is also a risk factor for keratitis and ulceration.

Patients with ECOG 2 performance status treated with Vectibix in combination with chemotherapy
For patients with ECOG 2 performance status, assessment of benefit-risk is recommended prior to initiation of Vectibix in combination with chemotherapy for treatment of mCRC. A positive benefit-risk balance has not been documented in patients with ECOG 2 performance status.

Elderly patients
No overall differences in safety or efficacy were observed in elderly patients (≥ 65 years of age) treated with Vectibix monotherapy. However, an increased number of serious adverse events were reported in elderly patients treated with Vectibix in combination with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone.

Other precautions
This medicinal product contains 0.150 mmol sodium (which is 3.45 mg sodium) per ml of concentrate. To be taken into consideration by patients on a controlled sodium diet.

To see the full prescribing information, visit View Source

About Vectibix (panitumumab) in the U.S.
Vectibix is the first fully human monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mCRC. Vectibix was approved in the U.S. in September 2006 as a monotherapy for the treatment of patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC after disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy.

In May 2014, the FDA approved Vectibix for use in combination with FOLFOX, as first-line treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2) mCRC. With this approval, Vectibix became the first-and-only biologic therapy indicated for use with FOLFOX, one of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens, in the first-line treatment of mCRC for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.

Important U.S. Product Information
Vectibix is indicated for the treatment of patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2 in codons 12 or 13) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as determined by an FDA-approved test for this use:

As first-line therapy in combination with FOLFOX
As monotherapy following disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy
Limitation of Use: Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with RAS-mutant mCRC or for whom RAS mutation status is unknown.

WARNING: DERMATOLOGIC TOXICITY
Dermatologic Toxicity: Dermatologic toxicities occurred in 90% of patients and were severe (NCI-CTC grade 3 or higher) in 15% of patients receiving Vectibix monotherapy.

In Study 1, dermatologic toxicities occurred in 90% of patients and were severe (NCI-CTC grade 3 and higher) in 15% of patients with mCRC receiving Vectibix. The clinical manifestations included, but were not limited to, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus, erythema, rash, skin exfoliation, paronychia, dry skin and skin fissures.

Monitor patients who develop dermatologic or soft tissue toxicities while receiving Vectibix for the development of inflammatory or infectious sequelae. Life-threatening and fatal infectious complications including necrotizing fasciitis, abscesses and sepsis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Life-threatening and fatal bullous mucocutaneous disease with blisters, erosions and skin sloughing has also been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. It could not be determined whether these mucocutaneous adverse reactions were directly related to EGFR inhibition or to idiosyncratic immune-related effects (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis). Withhold or discontinue Vectibix for dermatologic or soft tissue toxicity associated with severe or life-threatening inflammatory or infectious complications. Dose modifications for Vectibix concerning dermatologic toxicity are provided in the product labeling. Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that harbor somatic mutations in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13), exon 3 (codons 59 and 61), and exon 4 (codons 117 and 146) of either KRAS or NRAS and hereafter is referred to as "RAS."

Retrospective subset analyses across several randomized clinical trials were conducted to investigate the role of RAS mutations on the clinical effects of anti-EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab). Anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with tumors containing RAS mutations resulted in exposing those patients to anti-EGFR related adverse reactions without clinical benefit from these agents.

Additionally, in Study 3, 272 patients with RAS-mutant mCRC tumors received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX and 276 patients received FOLFOX alone. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, OS was shorter (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.45) in patients with RAS-mutant mCRC who received Vectibix and FOLFOX versus FOLFOX alone.

Progressively decreasing serum magnesium levels leading to severe (Grade 3-4) hypomagnesemia occurred in up to 7% (in Study 2) of patients across clinical trials. Monitor patients for hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia prior to initiating Vectibix treatment, periodically during Vectibix treatment, and for up to 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Other electrolyte disturbances, including hypokalemia, have also been observed. Replete magnesium and other electrolytes as appropriate.

In Study 1, 4% of patients experienced infusion reactions and 1% of patients experienced severe infusion reactions (NCI-CTC grade 3-4). Infusion reactions, manifesting as fever, chills, dyspnea, bronchospasm, and hypotension, can occur following Vectibix administration. Fatal infusion reactions occurred in postmarketing experience. Terminate the infusion for severe infusion reactions.

Severe diarrhea and dehydration, leading to acute renal failure and other complications, have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix in combination with chemotherapy.

Fatal and non-fatal cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (1%) and pulmonary fibrosis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Pulmonary fibrosis occurred in less than 1% (2/1467) of patients enrolled in clinical studies of Vectibix. In the event of acute onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms, interrupt Vectibix therapy. Discontinue Vectibix therapy if ILD is confirmed.

In patients with a history of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, the benefits of therapy with Vectibix versus the risk of pulmonary complications must be carefully considered.

Exposure to sunlight can exacerbate dermatologic toxicity. Advise patients to wear sunscreen and hats and limit sun exposure while receiving Vectibix.

Keratitis and ulcerative keratitis, known risk factors for corneal perforation, have been reported with Vectibix use. Monitor for evidence of keratitis or ulcerative keratitis. Interrupt or discontinue Vectibix for acute or worsening keratitis.

In an interim analysis of an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in the first-line setting in patients with mCRC, the addition of Vectibix to the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy resulted in decreased OS and increased incidence of NCI-CTC grade 3–5 (87% vs 72%) adverse reactions. NCI-CTC grade 3–4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients included rash/acneiform dermatitis (26% vs 1%), diarrhea (23% vs 12%), dehydration (16% vs 5%; primarily occurring in patients with diarrhea), hypokalemia (10% vs 4%), stomatitis/mucositis (4% vs < 1%), and hypomagnesemia (4% vs 0).

NCI-CTC grade 3–5 pulmonary embolism occurred at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients (7% vs 3%) and included fatal events in three (< 1%) Vectibix-treated patients.

As a result of the toxicities experienced, patients randomized to Vectibix, bevacizumab and chemotherapy received a lower mean relative dose intensity of each chemotherapeutic agent (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus 5-FU, and/or infusional 5-FU) over the first 24 weeks on study, compared with those randomized to bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

Advise patients of the need for adequate contraception in both males and females while receiving Vectibix and for 6 months after the last dose of Vectibix therapy. Vectibix may be transmitted from the mother to the developing fetus, and has the potential to cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women.

Because many drugs are excreted into human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from Vectibix, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. If nursing is interrupted, it should not be resumed earlier than 2 months following the last dose of Vectibix.

Women who become pregnant during Vectibix treatment are encouraged to enroll in Amgen’s Pregnancy Surveillance Program. Women who are nursing during Vectibix treatment are encouraged to enroll in Amgen’s Lactation Surveillance Program. Patients or their physicians should call 1-800-77-AMGEN (1-800-772-6436) to enroll.

In Study 1, the most common adverse reactions (> 20%) with Vectibix were skin rash with variable presentations, paronychia, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. The most common (> 5%) serious adverse reactions in the Vectibix arm were general physical health deterioration and intestinal obstruction.

In Study 3, the most commonly reported adverse reactions (> 20%) in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC receiving Vectibix (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and FOLFOX therapy (N = 322) were diarrhea, stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, asthenia, paronychia, anorexia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, rash, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus and dry skin. Serious adverse reactions (> 2% difference between treatment arms) in Vectibix-treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC were diarrhea and dehydration.

Novartis ALK+ metastatic NSCLC therapy Zykadia® extends progression-free survival beyond 18 months in Phase II study

On October 9, 2016 Novartis reported updated results from a Phase II study (ASCEND-3), which demonstrated that anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients taking Zykadia (ceritinib) as their first ALK inhibitor (post-chemotherapy) had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.4 months [95% CI: 10.9-26.3; median follow-up time of 25.9 months, as measured by blinded independent review committee (BIRC)][1] (Press release, Novartis, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515677]). Results were presented during an oral session at the Annual European Society for Medical Oncology Congress (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) in Copenhagen.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These results are consistent with findings from the Phase I ASCEND-1 study, which demonstrated a median PFS of 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.2-not reached) as per BIRC assessment with a median follow-up of 11.1 months[2]. The previous analysis by BIRC in ASCEND-3 indicated that the median PFS had not been reached after a median follow-up time of 8.3 months[3].

Further, in a sub-analysis of these data, patients who entered the study with brain metastases at baseline experienced an overall response rate (ORR) of 63.3% (95% CI: 48.3-76.6) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 83.7% (95% CI: 70.3-92.7), both as measured by BIRC. These results were similar to those in patients without brain metastases, who demonstrated an ORR of 64.0% (95% CI: 52.1-74.8) and DCR of 88.0% (95% CI: 78.4-94.4), based on BIRC assessment[1].

"The unfortunate reality of ALK+ NSCLC is that advancement is needed to delay disease progression in these patients," said lead investigator Dr. Enriqueta Felip, Head of the Thoracic Tumors Group, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. "These data, coupled with a compelling response in the sub-analysis of patients with baseline brain metastases, provide greater evidence of Zykadia’s potential efficacy in the ALKi-naïve population."

At the time of analysis, the estimated 18-month overall survival (OS) rate was 73.4% (95% CI: 64.6-80.4). This population also demonstrated an ORR of 63.7% (95% CI: 54.6-72.2) and median duration of response of 23.9 months (95% CI: 16.6-not estimable), according to BIRC assessment. A decrease in tumor burden from baseline was shown in 94.7% patients (investigator assessment only, no BIRC assessment available)[1].

"Novartis is committed to extending lives of patients with difficult-to-treat forms of cancer, and these data presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) affirm our desire to improve outcomes for those with metastatic NSCLC, specifically," said Alessandro Riva, MD, Global Head, Oncology Development and Medical Affairs, Novartis Oncology. "With our first-line Phase III results forthcoming as well as ongoing brain metastases studies, we look forward to sharing further evidence of Zykadia’s full potential."

Results from the randomized Phase III ASCEND-5 study were also presented for the first time, and were included as part of a late-breaking oral session as well as in the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) press program. The ASCEND-5 study assessed median PFS in patients previously treated with crizotinib and one or two prior regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy (including platinum doublet), who then received either Zykadia or standard chemotherapy. Results demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in median PFS by BIRC for patients taking Zykadia versus chemotherapy (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.67; p<0.001 one sided). Median PFS by BIRC for Zykadia and chemotherapy were 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.9) vs. 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.4-2.8), respectively[4].

The ALK gene arrangement, one of the three most common biomarkers – or genetic drivers -of NSCLC, affects approximately 2-7% of cases each year[5],[6]. More than half of these patients are either former smokers or have never smoked[7],[8],[9]. These patients are candidates for treatment with a targeted ALK inhibitor[6].

About ASCEND-3
ASCEND-3 is a Phase II single-arm, open-label, multicenter study which included 124 patients with ALK+ NSCLC who had received up to three lines of chemotherapy and had no prior experience with an ALK inhibitor. Brain metastases at baseline were seen in 39.5% of patients. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea [85.5% (3.2% grade 3/4)], nausea [77.4% (6.5% grade 3/4)] and vomiting [71.8% (6.5% grade 3/4)][1].

About ASCEND-5
ASCEND-5 is an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of Zykadia to standard second-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel) in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC who progressed on prior crizotinib and one or two prior regimens of chemotherapy. Of 231 patients, 115 were randomized to ceritinib and 116 to chemotherapy. Of patients discontinuing chemotherapy due to disease progression, 75 crossed over to Zykadia. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea [72.2% (4.3% grade 3/4)], nausea [66.1% (7.8% grade 3/4)] and vomiting [52.2% (7.8% grade 3/4)] with ceritinib; fatigue [28.3% (4.4% grade 3/4)], nausea [23.0% (1.8% grade 3/4)], alopecia [21.2% (0% grade 3/4)] and neutropenia [20.4% (15.0% grade 3/4)] with chemotherapy[4].

About Zykadia
Zykadia is an oral, selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a gene that can fuse with others to form an abnormal "fusion protein" that promotes the development and growth of certain tumors in cancers including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Zykadia was granted conditional approval in the EU for the treatment of adult patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC previously treated with crizotinib. In the US, Zykadia was granted accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib.

Zykadia is currently approved in over 55 countries worldwide. Please visit www.NovartisOncology.com/news/product-portfolio/zykadia (link is external) for additional information.

Zykadia Important Safety Information
Zykadia may cause serious side effects.

Zykadia may cause stomach upset and intestinal problems in most patients, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and stomach-area pain. These problems can be severe. Patients should follow their doctor’s instructions about taking medicines to help these symptoms, and should call their doctor for advice if symptoms are severe or do not go away.

Zykadia may cause severe liver injury. Patients should have blood tests prior to the start of treatment with Zykadia, every two weeks for the first month of treatment and monthly thereafter, and should talk to their doctor right away if they experience any of the following symptoms: tiredness (fatigue), itchy skin, yellowing of the skin or the whites of the eyes, nausea or vomiting, decreased appetite, pain on the right side of the abdomen, urine turns dark or brown, or bleeding or bruising more easily than normal.

Zykadia may cause severe or life-threatening swelling (inflammation) of the lungs during treatment that can lead to death. Symptoms may be similar to those symptoms from lung cancer. Patients should tell their doctor right away about any new or worsening symptoms, including trouble breathing or shortness of breath, fever, cough, with or without mucous, or chest pain.

Zykadia may cause very slow, very fast, or abnormal heartbeats. Doctors should check their patient’s heart during treatment with Zykadia. Patients should tell their doctor right away if they feel new chest pain or discomfort, dizziness or lightheadedness, faint, or have abnormal heartbeats, blue discoloration of lips, shortness of breath, swelling of lower limbs or skin, or if they start to take or have any changes in heart or blood pressure medicines.

Zykadia may cause high levels of glucose in the blood. People who have diabetes or glucose intolerance, or who take a corticosteroid medicine have an increased risk of high blood sugar with Zykadia. Patients should have glucose blood tests prior to the start of treatment with Zykadia and during treatment. Patients should follow their doctor’s instructions about blood sugar monitoring and call their doctor right away with any symptoms of high blood sugar, including increased thirst and/or urinating often.

Zykadia may cause high levels of pancreatic enzymes in the blood and may cause pancreatitis. Patients should have blood tests prior to the start of treatment with Zykadia and as needed during their treatment with Zykadia. Patients should talk to their doctor if they experience signs and symptoms of pancreatitis which including upper abdominal pain that may spread to the back and get worse with eating.

Before patients take Zykadia, they should tell their doctor about all medical conditions, including liver problems; diabetes or high blood sugar; heart problems, including a condition called long QT syndrome; if they are pregnant, if they think they may be pregnant, or if they plan to become pregnant; are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed.

Zykadia may harm unborn babies. Women who are able to become pregnant must use a highly effective method of birth control (contraception) during treatment with Zykadia and up to 3 months after stopping Zykadia. It is not known if Zykadia passes into breast milk. Patients and their doctor should decide whether to take Zykadia or breastfeed, but should not do both.

Patients should tell their doctor about medicines they take, including prescription medicines, over-the-counter medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements. If they take Zykadia while using oral contraceptives, the oral contraceptives may become ineffective.

The most common adverse reactions with an incidence of >=10% were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, tiredness (fatigue), liver laboratory test abnormalities (requires blood test monitoring), abdominal pain, decreased appetite, constipation, rash, kidney laboratory test abnormalities (requires blood test monitoring), heartburn and anemia. Grade 3-4 adverse reactions with an incidence of >=5% were liver laboratory test abnormalities, tiredness (fatigue), diarrhea, nausea and hyperglycemia (requires blood test monitoring).

Patients should stop taking Zykadia and seek medical help immediately if they experience any of the following, which may be signs of an allergic reaction:

Difficulty in breathing or swallowing
Swelling of the face, lips, tongue or throat
Severe itching of the skin, with a red rash or raised bumps
Patients should tell their doctor of any side effect that bothers them or does not go away. These are not all of the possible side effects of Zykadia. For more information, patients should ask their doctor or pharmacist.

Patients should take Zykadia exactly as their health care provider tells them. Patients should not change their dose or stop taking Zykadia unless their health care provider advises them to. Zykadia should be taken once a day on an empty stomach. Patients should not eat for at least 2 hours before and 2 hours after taking Zykadia. If a dose of Zykadia is missed, they should take it as soon as they remember. If their next dose is due within the next 12 hours, they should skip the missed dose and take the next dose at their regular time. They should not take a double dose to make up for a forgotten dose. Patients should not drink grapefruit juice or eat grapefruit during treatment with Zykadia, as it may make the amount of Zykadia in their blood increase to a harmful level. If patients have to vomit after swallowing Zykadia capsules, they should not take more capsules until their next scheduled dose.

Please see full Prescribing Information for Zykadia.

Phase 2 Study of Single-agent Glembatumumab Vedotin in Patients with Checkpoint-Refractory Metastatic Melanoma Meets Primary Overall Response Endpoint and Demonstrates Clinically Meaningful Duration of Response

On October 9, 2016 Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLDX) reported positive results from the Company’s Phase 2 study of glembatumumab vedotin in patients with stage III/IV checkpoint inhibitor-refractory, and, if applicable, BRAF/MEK inhibitor-refractory metastatic melanoma (n=62) (Press release, Celldex Therapeutics, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515680]). Glembatumumab vedotin is a fully-human monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets glycoprotein NMB (gpNMB), a protein overexpressed by multiple tumor types, including metastatic melanoma where greater than 80% of patients overexpress the marker. High tumor expression of gpNMB is associated with shorter metastasis-free survival and reduced overall survival.1 Study results were presented today at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2016 Congress in Copenhagen in poster titled "A Phase 2 study of glembatumumab vedotin (GV), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting gpNMB, in advanced melanoma."

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Study Highlights

The primary endpoint of the study (6 or more objective responses in the first 52 patients enrolled) was exceeded. 7 of 62 (11%) patients experienced a confirmed response, and an additional 3 patients also experienced single timepoint responses.
Median duration of response in this heavily pre-treated patient population was 6.0 months.
53% of patients experienced stable disease (with a minimum duration of six weeks).
A 52% disease control rate (patients without progression for greater than three months) was demonstrated.
52% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage.
Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 4.4 months.
Patients who experienced rash in Cycle 1 experienced a 20% confirmed response rate and a more prolonged PFS of 5.5 months [p=0.054; HR=0.52 (0.27, 1.02)].
"While immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF targeted therapy have dramatically changed outcomes for many patients with metastatic melanoma, patients who either do not respond or progress through these treatments are faced with very limited treatment options," said Patrick Ott, M.D., Ph.D., Clinical Director of the Melanoma Center and the Center for Immuno-Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and an investigator in the study. "The single-agent activity observed in this study and the corresponding duration of response is highly encouraging. I am hopeful that pursuing combination studies of glembatumumab vedotin, including with checkpoint inhibition, could help us bring benefit to an even larger number of melanoma and other cancer patients."

"It’s clear based on these study results that refractory metastatic melanoma is a responsive target indication for glembatumumab vedotin," said Thomas Davis, M.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer of Celldex Therapeutics. "gpNMB is very highly expressed in melanoma with all tissue samples on study testing positive, and almost 80% of tumors demonstrating 100% expression in their epithelial cells. We’re encouraged by the results we’ve seen to date in this advanced, checkpoint refractory setting and believe leveraging the immune system through combination therapy is a critical next step for patients in in this indication."

Study Overview
This study was a Phase 2, open-label study of glembatumumab vedotin in patients with unresectable stage III (n=1; 2%) or stage IV (n=61; 98%) melanoma. The median number of prior therapies was three (range of 1 to 6). All patients had progressed after checkpoint therapy, and almost all patients had received both ipilimumab (n=58; 94%) and PD-1/PDL-1 (n=58; 94%) therapy. Twelve patients presented with BRAF mutation, and eleven had prior treatment with BRAF or BRAF/MEK targeted agents. Patients received glembatumumab vedotin every three weeks until disease progression or intolerance. The safety profile was consistent with prior studies of glembatumumab vedotin with rash, neutropenia, and neuropathy experienced as the most significant adverse events. Consistent with previous studies in melanoma and breast cancer, rash was associated with greater clinical benefit.

Clinical Efficacy

Primary Endpoint: Confirmed Response Rate (ORR) Met 7/62 (11%)
Duration of Response Median: 6.0 months
Range: 1.4 + to 8.6+
Any Response, Including Those not Confirmed at Subsequent Assessment 10/62 (16%)
Stable Disease 33/62 (53%)
Disease Control Rate 32/62 (52%)
Patients with Tumor Shrinkage 32/62 (52%)
Progression-free Survival Median: 4.4 months
Range: 0.4 to 15.8+
Tumor tissue (pre-treatment) was available for 58 patients at the time of analysis. All samples were gpNMB positive, and 79% of patients had tumors with 100% of their epithelial cells expressing gpNMB. Given both the high level of expression and the intensity of expression across this patient population, identifying a potential population for gpNMB enrichment is not feasible; therefore, all patients with metastatic melanoma could be evaluated as potential candidates for treatment with glembatumumab vedotin in future studies.

Next Steps
In August 2016, the Company announced that the primary endpoint had been met in this Phase 2 single-agent study of glembatumumab vedotin in metastatic melanoma (post-progression on/after checkpoint therapy) and that the Company was amending the protocol to add a second cohort of patients to a glembatumumab vedotin and varlilumab combination. Varlilumab is Celldex’s fully human monoclonal agonist antibody that binds and activates CD27, a critical co-stimulatory molecule in the immune activation cascade. This additional cohort is open to enrollment. Upon completion of enrollment in this cohort, the Company is exploring opening a new arm in the study to assess a glembatumumab vedotin and checkpoint combination. This rationale is strongly supported by preclinical data that suggest that the anti-tumor activity may be enhanced with the combination. In addition, due to their direct cytotoxic properties, microtubule-depolymerizing agents like MMAE also appear to convert tumor-resident tolerogenic dendritic cells into active antigen-presenting cells.2 The Company also intends to conduct exploratory analyses of pre-entry skin biopsies in future patients to investigate potential predictors of response to glembatumumab vedotin, given the association of rash and outcome.

About Glembatumumab Vedotin
Glembatumumab vedotin is a fully-human monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets glycoprotein NMB (gpNMB). gpNMB is a protein overexpressed by multiple tumor types, including breast cancer, melanoma, lung cancer, uveal melanoma and osteosarcoma. gpNMB has been shown to be associated with the ability of the cancer cell to invade and metastasize and to correlate with reduced time to progression and survival in breast cancer. The gpNMB-targeting antibody, CR011, is linked to a potent cytotoxic, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), using Seattle Genetics’ proprietary technology. Glembatumumab vedotin is designed to be stable in the bloodstream but to release MMAE upon internalization into gpNMB-expressing tumor cells, resulting in a targeted cell-killing effect. Glembatumumab vedotin is in development for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an initial focus in triple negative disease, stage III and IV melanoma, squamous cell lung cancer, uveal melanoma and osteosarcoma.

Molecular Partners Presents Data of MP0250 in an All-Comer Phase 1-Study
in Solid Tumor Patients and Updates on Phase 2 Studies

On October 09, 2016 Molecular Partners AG (SIX: MOLN), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company that is developing a powerful new class of therapies known as DARPin therapies, reported additional details about its ongoing clinical oncology program MP0250. M.R. Middleton, Professor of Experimental Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology at the University of Oxford, UK presents today the completed phase 1 dose escalation interim results of MP0250 at the poster session ‘Developmental Therapeutics’ at the Conference of the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) (Press release, Molecular Partners, OCT 9, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515660]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

MP0250 is a multi-DARPin product consisting of four domains targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and also binds to human serum albumin (HSA) to increase the plasma half-life and potentially tissue penetration.

Prof. M.R. Middleton commented: "MP0250 used as single agent is the first DARPin drug candidate to be studied in humans as systemic treatment. The drug is generally well tolerated and the side effect profile is consistent with profound inhibition of the VEGF pathway. We have seen encouraging signs of clinical activity in these heavily pretreated patients, with two patients showing significant reduction of tumor burden and 6 patients having prolonged stable disease. MP0250 has the potential to become a new therapeutic in treating various tumor types."

These data, now based on the total enrollment of 24 patients, are an important milestone in the development of DARPin proteins as anticancer agents and expand the results that were published at the AACR (Free AACR Whitepaper)-NCI-EORTC conference in November 2015:

• MP0250 was well tolerated at the higher dose levels (up to 8 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks). This was assigned as the maximally tolerated dose (MTD). Toxicities came primarily from the inhibition of VEGF, including dose-limiting toxicities of acute left ventricular failure, nephrotic syndrome and hypertension, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and thrombotic microangiopathy.

• MP0250 had a half-life of about 12 days and shows full exposure in all patients over the whole treatment period at all doses.

2/3 Update on phase 2 strategy for MP0250

The first phase 2 study will examine MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma who have failed proteasome and IMiD based standard therapies. The first regulatory submission for such study is planned in Q4 2016.

Based on the encouraging data from phase 1 in solid tumors, Molecular Partners decided to initiate an additional phase 2 study for a solid tumor indication. Study details will be disclosed in H1 2017.

About the DARPin technology

Molecular Partners is progressing programs in ophthalmology in partnership with Allergan and in oncology with a proprietary pipeline of DARPin drug candidates. The most advanced assets globally is abicipar, a molecule currently in phase 3 which is being advanced by Allergan. Abicipar is being followed by several DARPins for various ophthalmic indications. The most advanced systemic DARPin molecule, MP0250, is in clinical development for solid tumors and is moving to phase 2 for hematological and solid tumors. The second most advanced oncology DARPin drug candidate is MP0274, which has broad anti-HER activity, inhibiting HER1, HER2, and HER3- mediated downstream signaling via Her2 and leading to induction of apoptosis. MP0274 is currently in preclinical development. There is a growing pipeline of immune-oncological treatments following the two proprietary lead assets.