ImmunoCellular Therapeutics Establishes Agreement with Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC for ICT-107 Phase 3 Registrational Trial in Glioblastoma

On December 7, 2015 ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. ("ImmunoCellular") (NYSE MKT: IMUC) reported the establishment of an agreement with a major cancer research group, Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC (AFT), for the phase 3 registrational trial of its cancer immunotherapy ICT-107 in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (Press release, ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, DEC 7, 2015, View Source [SID:1234508455]). AFT in conjunction with the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology comprises nearly 10,000 cancer specialists at hospitals, medical centers, and community clinics across the United States. AFT will support the phase 3 trial by providing access to its large network of clinical sites and patients, with the goal of accelerating patient enrollment in the trial. Multiple phase 3 clinical trial sites have been opened for patient enrollment in the US, with additional sites anticipated to open in Canada and Europe in the coming weeks and months.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Andrew Gengos, ImmunoCellular Chief Executive Officer, commented: "Working in collaboration with AFT has the potential to significantly accelerate enrollment in the ICT-107 phase 3 trial, and to engage the participation of important clinical sites throughout in the US. AFT is one of the most highly respected cancer organizations in America, and we are appreciative of their endorsement and support for our registrational trial."

ImmunoCellular has reached agreement with the FDA on a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) with respect to the primary and secondary endpoints as well as the statistical plan for the phase 3 trial. ImmunoCellular has also been awarded a $19.9 million grant from the governing Board of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), California’s stem cell agency, to implement the phase 3 registration trial.

Bellicum Announces Oral Presentation at ASH Showing Improved Potency and Control with CIDeCAR T-Cell Therapies

On December 7, 2015 Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq:BLCM), a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing novel cellular immunotherapies for cancers and orphan inherited blood disorders, reported preclinical data from studies of its CIDeCAR CAR T-cell technology, including product candidate BPX-401, in an oral presentation at the 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting today (Press release, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, DEC 7, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2120758 [SID:1234508476]). The preclinical in vivo data show that tumors can be eliminated quickly and safely with the Company’s CIDeCAR novel costimulatory domain and safety switch.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In the oral presentation, "Expression of MyD88/CD40 Drives In Vivo Activation and Proliferation of Chimeric Antigen Receptor Modified T Cells That Can Be Effectively Regulated by Inducible Caspase-9," Bellicum scientists compared CIDeCARs targeting CD19 or other tumor antigens to CAR constructs based on 4-1BB and CD28. CIDeCAR combines Bellicum’s novel costimulatory domain MC (MyD88/CD40) and the CaspaCIDe safety switch. Bellicum’s small molecule rimiducid was used to activate the CaspaCIDe safety switch. The CaspaCIDe safety switch was also employed as a "dimmer switch," titrating the number of CIDeCAR cells in order to remain within a therapeutic window that maximizes both safety and efficacy, for improved clinical benefit.

Study Highlights

Activation:

The addition of the MC costimulatory domain led to a significant increase in in vivo activation and persistence of the CIDeCAR CAR T cells when compared to CARs constructed with conventional costimulatory domains CD28 and 4-1BB.
Studies also showed that CAR T cells with the MC costimulatory domain eliminated cancer cells faster in animal models than CARs using CD28 or 4-1BB.
Safety:

In CD19 and HER2 animal models, the majority of CAR T cells can be eliminated if needed, leading to rapid recovery from cytokine release-like syndrome, without tumor relapse.
Experiments also demonstrate that the CaspaCIDe safety switch can be titrated. Lower concentrations of small molecule activator rimiducid led to elimination of only a portion of circulating CAR T cells, including possibly the most active cells, without losing the antitumor effect of treatment.
GoCAR-T and GoTCR Poster Presentations

Two additional poster presentations1,2 at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) featured the Company’s GoCAR-T and GoTCR technologies. GoCAR-T technology uses rimiducid to control persistence of CAR-T cells in vivo for therapeutic effect. In animal experiments targeting CD19 and Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA), Bellicum scientists demonstrated that a single IV injection of GoCAR-T cells containing the proprietary iMC (inducible MyD88/CD40) activation switch could eliminate large, established solid tumors and lymphomas. Administration of rimiducid stimulated the survival and proliferation of GoCAR-T cells, which may allow more effective therapy of solid tumors in patients.

In an additional poster session, Bellicum scientists used the same iMC activation switch to complement HLA-A2/Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME)-specific TCR-modified T cells to create "GoTCR"s that also could be activated by rimiducid, similar to the GoCAR-T platform. PRAME-targeted GoTCRs were active against PRAME-expressing tumors in vitro and in vivo. Activation with weekly administration of rimiducid led to more effective tumor control. In this application of the CID technology, toxicity is controlled by the cessation of rimiducid administration, acting like "lifting one’s foot off of a gas pedal," without the loss of tumor control.

"These preclinical data support the advancement of our product candidates BPX-401 and BPX-601 into clinical trials. We are also excited about the potential of our GoTCR platform to address the limitations of TCR therapy by enabling control over the cells’ proliferation and persistence," commented Tom Farrell, Bellicum’s President and CEO.

1 Foster A, Mahendravada A, Shinners N, et al. "Inducible MyD88/CD40 allows rimiducid-dependent activation to control proliferation and survival of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells." 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper), Orlando, FL

2 Hoang T, Foster A, Lu A, et al. "Inducible MyD88/CD40 enhances proliferation and survival of PRAME-specific TCR-engineered T cells and increases anti-tumor effects in myeloma 2015." Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper), Orlando, FL

MEI Pharma Announces Positive Results from Phase II Study of Pracinostat in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Plans to Initiate Phase III Registration Study

On December 7, 2015 MEI Pharma, Inc. (Nasdaq: MEIP), an oncology company focused on the clinical development of novel therapies for cancer, reported positive results from a Phase II study of its investigational drug candidate Pracinostat in combination with azacitidine (marketed as Vidaza) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Press release, MEI Pharma, DEC 7, 2015, View Source [SID:1234508456]). The results were presented earlier today at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Orlando. A copy of the presentation is now available at www.meipharma.com.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

According to the oral presentation by principal investigator Dr. Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 28 of the 50 patients in the study (56%) achieved the primary endpoint of complete response (CR) plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) plus morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), including 21 patients (42%) who achieved a CR. Notably, 19 of the 21 patients who achieved a CR are still alive with a 100% one-year survival rate among all CR patients, indicating a correlation between CR and survival with this low intensity therapy.

Median overall survival for all 50 patients in the study has not been reached, with 28 patients still living and a median observation time of 14.3 months. These data compare favorably to a recent international Phase III study of azacitidine (AZA-001)1, which showed a median overall survival of 10.4 months with azacitidine alone and a CR rate of 19.5% in a similar patient population. Median survival among patients with high-risk cytogenetics in this study (n=21) was 13.3 months, more than double the median survival of the high-risk population in the AZA-001 study (6.4 months).

"These are impressive results by virtually any measure for a group of patients in dire need of effective new treatment options," said Dr. Garcia-Manero. "Not only did we observe a high rate of responses, but many occurred rapidly and continued to improve with ongoing therapy. Most importantly, we are seeing an encouraging trend in overall survival, particularly among patients who achieved a complete response. These data clearly support further development of Pracinostat in combination with azacitidine for the treatment of elderly patients with AML."

The open-label study enrolled a total of 50 patients at 15 centers across the U.S. Median age in the study was 76 years. Patients received 60 mg of Pracinostat orally three times a week for three weeks followed by one week of rest and 75 mg m2 of azacitidine via subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion for the first seven days of each 28-day cycle. The combination of Pracinostat and azacitidine was generally well tolerated in the study, with no unexpected toxicities. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in >10% of all patients included febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and fatigue.

"We are very excited about our growing body of AML data, which continues to exceed expectations and guide us forward with the development of this program," said Daniel P. Gold, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of MEI Pharma. "Over the past several months we have learned that our randomized study of Pracinostat and azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was hindered by a high rate of discontinuations due to adverse events, but appeared to show a benefit for patients who were able to tolerate treatment for at least four cycles compared to azacitidine alone. The results from our AML study demonstrate that many patients are achieving responses within the first two cycles, with fewer discontinuations overall due to adverse events compared to our MDS study, suggesting a prudent development path forward for the combination.

"Based on these findings," continued Dr. Gold, "we will now begin to prepare for a Phase III registration study of Pracinostat and azacitidine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML, which we plan to initiate in the second half of 2016. We look forward to sharing more information regarding the design of this study in the months ahead."

About Pracinostat

Pracinostat is a potent oral inhibitor of a group of enzymes called histone deacetylases, or HDACs. HDACs belong to a larger set of proteins collectively known as epigenetic regulators that can alter gene expression by chemically modifying DNA or its associated chromosomal proteins. Abnormal activity of these regulators is believed to play an important role in cancer and other diseases. Pracinostat has been tested in multiple Phase I and Phase II clinical studies in advanced hematologic diseases and solid tumor indications. The results of these studies suggest that Pracinostat has potential best-in-class pharmacokinetic properties when compared to other oral HDAC inhibitors, with side effects often associated with drugs of this class, including fatigue and myelofibrosis. Pracinostat has not been approved for commercial distribution in the U.S.

MEI Pharma owns exclusive worldwide rights to Pracinostat.

About AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (also known as acute myelogenous leukemia) is the most common acute leukemia affecting adults, and its incidence is expected to continue to increase as the population ages. The American Cancer Society estimates about 20,830 new cases of AML per year in the U.S., with an average age of about 67 years. Treatment options for AML remain virtually unchanged over the past 30 years. Front line treatment consists primarily of chemotherapy, while the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology recommend azacitidine or decitabine (marketed as Dacogen) as low intensity treatment options for AML patients over the age of 60 who are unsuitable for induction chemotherapy.

Immune Design Highlights G100 Preclinical Data Demonstrating Direct and Abscopal Tumor Regression, Long-Term Response and Synergy With Checkpoint Blockade

On December 7, 2015 Immune Design (Nasdaq:IMDZ), a clinical-stage immunotherapy company focused on oncology, reported the presentation of data on G100 demonstrating both direct and abscopal (indirect) tumor regression, as well as tumor-specific, long-term immune protection (Press release, Immune Design, DEC 7, 2015, View Source [SID:1234508477]). G100 is Immune Design’s intratumoral TLR4 agonist-based product candidate and is currently in clinical trials. Results were highlighted during an oral presentation at the 57th American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The research, authored by Ronald Levy and Idit Sagiv-Barfi of Stanford University and Hailing Lu, Jessica Hewitt, Frank Hsu and Jan ter Meulen of Immune Design, investigated the therapeutic impact and immune response of intratumoral administration of G100 in a preclinical model of lymphoma. Results demonstrated:

tumor regression in 60-100 percent across the animal models;

tumor growth inhibition reported in both injected tumors as well as uninjected tumors (abscopal effects);

responders remained tumor-free at least three months post G100 treatment and were resistant to secondary challenge with the same tumor type;

tumor-specific, systemic CD8 T cell responses were induced and shown to mediate anti-tumor protection;

combination with immune checkpoint modulation led to enhanced tumor protection and improved survival; and
G100 had an impact on the tumor microenvironment, changing it from a non-inflammatory state ("cold" tumor microenvironment) to an inflamed state ("hot" tumor microenvironment).

"These data demonstrate the ability of G100 to alter the tumor microenvironment and generate a systemic T-cell based anti-tumor response that is both specific and long-lasting," said Dr. Ronald Levy, Professor and Chief, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine. "G100, either alone or in combination with immune checkpoint modulators, according to this model may hold potential as a treatment for lymphoma patients."

"These findings build on the strong set of preclinical and clinical data that support the ability of Immune Design’s G100 product candidate to have an impact on the immunotherapy landscape, including in combination with other immuno-oncology approaches," said Jan ter Meulen, MD, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer at Immune Design. "These data provide support for our planned clinical trial in patients with follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving local radiation, with or without the anti-PD-1 therapy, Keytruda, pursuant to our collaboration with Merck."

About G100

G100 is a product candidate generated from the company’s GLAASTM discovery platform, and includes a specific formulation of Glucopyranosyl Lipid A (GLA), a synthetic, toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) agonist. G100 is part of Immune Design’s intratumoral immune activation, or ‘Endogenous Antigen’ approach to treating cancer, which leverages the activation of dendritic and other immune cells in the tumor microenvironment to potentially create a robust immune response against the tumor’s preexisting diverse set of antigens. Preclinical and clinical data have demonstrated the ability of G100 to activate dendritic cells in tumors and to increase antigen-dependent systemic humoral and cellular Th1 immune responses.

G100 Study in Patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma

A Phase 1 study of G100 in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) recently completed enrollment, and Immune Design presented data at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting. In the first eight patients of the MCC study, G100 had an acceptable safety profile and resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 50% per protocol.

G100 Study in Patients with Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

A Phase 1 study evaluating intratumoral G100 in patients with follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is currently enrolling patients (NCT: 02501473). The study is being updated to examine intratumoral administration of G100 with intravenous administration of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapy, in patients with follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving local radiation. In addition to an evaluation of the safety of the combination, the study will assess the response in both injected and non-injected lesions.

Karyopharm Therapeutics Presents Positive Clinical Data on the Activity of Selinexor in Combination with Other Anticancer Agents across Multiple Hematologic Malignancies at the 2015 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting

On December 7, 2015 Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq:KPTI), a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company, reported the presentation of positive clinical and preclinical data describing the activity of its lead oncology drug candidate, selinexor, and its oncology pipeline for the treatment of hematologic malignancies at the 2015 American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) annual meeting held December 5-8, 2015 in Orlando, Florida (Press release, Karyopharm, DEC 7, 2015, View Source [SID:1234511225]). Oral and poster presentations representing both company and investigator-sponsored clinical and preclinical studies described data related to selinexor, Karyopharm’s first-in-class, oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that inhibits exportin 1 (XPO1). In addition, encouraging preclinical data on other pipeline programs, including a second generation SINE compound, KPT-8602, and a dual acting p21-activated kinase 4 and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (PAK4/NAMPT) inhibitor, KPT-9274, were presented.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Our investigators are highly encouraged by the activity of selinexor in combination with standard of care agents for the treatment of a variety of cancers," said Sharon Shacham, PhD, MBA, President and Chief Scientific Officer of Karyopharm. "Data presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) demonstrate that selinexor is efficacious and often synergistic in combination with other therapeutic agents, including carfilzomib and dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma, with Ara-C and idarubicin in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and with fludarabine and cytarabine in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemias. These recent results add to the growing body of evidence seen with selinexor in combinations, including the recently announced preclinical synergy of selinexor with immune checkpoint inhibitors."

"In addition to selinexor, we continue to demonstrate Karyopharm’s commitment and expertise in the field of SINE therapy with encouraging preclinical data presented for KPT-8602, a second generation SINE compound with distinct pharmaceutical properties and the potential for daily dosing. Exciting preclinical data was also presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) for our novel, first-in-class, dual acting PAK4/NAMPT inhibitor," continued Dr. Shacham.

Selinexor in combination with standard of care agents in multiple myeloma
Preliminary data from an ongoing investigator sponsored trial (IST) of selinexor in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were previously presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) 2014 and updated today with additional patient data. In light of these data presented by Andrzej Jakubowiak, MD, PhD, from The University of Chicago, with support from the Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium, Amgen Inc. and Karyopharm, Karyopharm plans to initiate a Phase 2/3 clinical study (SCORE) by early 2016 to evaluate the combination of selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with refractory MM who were previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent. In addition, Karyopharm recently initiated a 3-arm Phase 1b/2 clinical study (STOMP) evaluating selinexor plus low dose dexamethasone in combination with the MM backbone therapies with either bortezomib or pomalidomide or lenalidomide. Karyopharm’s commitment to these studies is based upon the growing body of preclinical evidence demonstrating that adding selinexor and dexamethasone to active anti-cancer agents, including proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, may provide prolonged clinical benefit and restore drug sensitivity in MM.

"These data demonstrate encouraging efficacy of selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone in heavily pretreated patients with highly refractory multiple myeloma, including patients whose disease is refractory to previous carfilzomib-based combinations, suggesting the potential of this combination to overcome carfilzomib resistance," said Dr. Andrzej J. Jakubowiak from The University of Chicago.

In a poster titled, "Phase 1 MMRC Trial of Selinexor, Carfilzomib (CFZ) and Dexamethasone (DEX) in Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma," Dr. Jakubowiak and his colleagues demonstrated a 67% overall response rate with the combination of selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone and no unexpected toxicities observed to date. All evaluable patients whose responses were reported at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) had MM that was refractory to carfilzomib.

Nine patients with refractory MM were evaluable as of September 30, 2015, had a median age of 67 years and a median of four prior treatment regimens. All patients enrolled were refractory to prior carfilzomib-based treatment. Seven patients were carfilzomib-refractory in their last prior therapy before enrolling on the combination study with selinexor.

Response rates for all enrolled patients were 67% with partial responses (PR) or better, including 22% with very good partial responses (VGPR); 78% had at least minor responses (MR). Responses occurred rapidly within the first one to two cycles. Five of the seven (71%) patients refractory to carfilzomib in their last prior therapy responded with a PR or better.

Seven patients were evaluable for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and no DLTs were reported. A maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not yet been established, and none of the patients discontinued the study due to adverse events (AEs). The AEs were reversible and manageable with supportive care. Grade 3/4 AEs were predominantly hematological and included thrombocytopenia (67%), neutropenia (44%), lymphopenia (22%) and anemia (22%). The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic AE was fatigue (22%).

Additionally, in two posters titled, "Selinexor is an Effective Cancer Treatment in Hypoxic Conditions and Synergizes with Proteasome Inhibitors to Treat Drug Resistant Multiple Myeloma," and "Combination Therapy of Selinexor with Bortezomib or Carfilzomib Overcomes Drug Resistance to Proteasome Inhibitors (PI) in Human Multiple Myeloma," Karyopharm researchers and collaborators demonstrated the potential of selinexor to synergize with proteasome inhibitors to overcome drug resistance.

Selinexor combinations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Clinical data presented at ASH (Free ASH Whitepaper) demonstrated the activity and tolerability of selinexor in combination with standard of care agents in the AML setting; a Phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and tolerability of arabinoside cytosine (Ara-C) and idarubicin in combination with selinexor in "fit" patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML and a Phase 1 study determining the safety and efficacy of selinexor in combination with fludarabine and cytarabine in pediatric patients with relapsed and/or refractory acute leukemia.

"Acute myeloid leukemia is the most frequent cause of leukemia-related death. While complete response rates can be as high as 80% in patients undergoing initial induction chemotherapy, the majority of AML patients will relapse with a bleak prognosis. As there is currently no standard-of-care regimen for these patients, a great unmet medical need exists for new treatment options such as selinexor," said Walter Fiedler, MD of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, the lead investigator for the study.

In a poster titled, "SAIL: Selinexor, ARA-C and Idarubicin: An Effective and Tolerable Combination in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory AML: A Multicenter Phase II Study," Karyopharm researchers in collaboration with Dr. Fiedler demonstrated that Ara-C and idarubicin in combination with selinexor has the potential to achieve significant response rates, particularly in this heavily pretreated patient population, without unexpected toxicities observed to date. Importantly, these responses enabled the majority of patients to proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

As of June 16, 2015, 20 patients with relapsed/refractory AML were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 59 (range 22-78) years. On average, patients received approximately 3.5 (range 1-6) prior therapies, all including intensive chemotherapy.
Overall response rate (ORR) was 60% (45% of patients achieved complete response (CR), 5% of patients achieved complete response with incomplete count recovery (CRi) and 10% of patients achieved PR). Sixty percent of patients treated received or were planned for stem cell transplantation or donor lymphocyte infusion.

The most frequent non-hematologic AEs were vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, anorexia and neutropenic fever. One treatment-related death occurred wherein a patient with grade 4 thrombocytopenia developed a subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is common in relapsed AML due to intensive chemotherapy and is a less frequent consequence of single-agent selinexor treatment.
This trial will be expanded further, and has provided the basis for several front-line and other combination therapies for the treatment of AML.

In a poster titled "Phase I Study of Selinexor, a Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, in Combination with Fludarabine and Cytarabine (AraC) in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia," Karyopharm researchers in collaboration with Jeffrey E. Rubnitz, MD of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital demonstrated that selinexor given in combination with fludarabine and cytarabine is tolerable in pediatric patients with relapsed acute leukemia. Most patients demonstrated XPO1 target inhibition with encouraging response rates which will be further explored in the Phase 2 portion of this trial.
Eighteen children or adolescents with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia (prior therapies included intensive chemotherapy combinations) completed at least one cycle of selinexor and were evaluable for safety; four treated at dose level 1 (30 mg/m2), three at dose level 2 (40 mg/m2), six at dose level 3 (55 mg/m2), and five at dose level 4 (70 mg/m2). Two DLTs of cerebellar toxicity were observed at dose level 4 (70 mg/m2), thereby establishing a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 55 mg/m2. The most common grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity related to selinexor was asymptomatic hyponatremia, which was observed in 13 patients and easily corrected in all cases.

Twelve patients were evaluable for response. The ORR was 67%. Four patients achieved CR, 2 CRi, and two had a PR. Seven of the eight patients with objective responses underwent subsequent stem cell transplantation.
Inhibition of XPO1 was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, or qRT-PCR, of XPO1 mRNA, which is upregulated in response to selinexor. Thirteen of the first fourteen patients enrolled on the trial demonstrated at least two-fold induction of XPO1 mRNA, which persisted for at least 48 hours, indicating prolonged inhibition of the protein by selinexor.

Optimizing selinexor dose
Karyopharm researchers also presented data establishing 60mg as the most appropriate selinexor dose for both efficacy and tolerability across many of the hematologic cancers as well as preclinical data on Karyopharm’s emerging oncology pipeline including KPT-8602, a second generation SINE compound, and KPT-9274, Karyopharm’s novel, first-in-class, dual acting PAK4/NAMPT inhibitor.

In an oral presentation titled, "Safety, Efficacy, and Determination of the Recommended Phase 2 Dose for the Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Selinexor (KPT-330)," Karyopharm researchers and Christine Chen, MD, of the Princess Margaret Cancer Center demonstrated that while efficacy was comparable, doses of selinexor from 45-65mg (median 60mg) were better tolerated than doses greater than 65mg and showed less weight loss, fewer incidence of high grade adverse events, and greater numbers of days on study.

266 heavily pretreated patients with MM, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, AML, and other hematological malignancies were divided into three groups of evaluable patients: those that received 4-44mg (median 30mg), 45-65mg (median 60mg) and > 65mg (70-160mg; median 90mg) for comparison of safety and efficacy endpoints.
Patients in the 4-44mg and 45-65mg groups remained on study longer than those receiving > 65mg, with average treatment duration of 120 days versus 90 days, respectively. Overall efficacy appeared superior in the 45-65mg dose group across multiple hematologic indications.

The most common AEs were nausea (63%), fatigue (62%), anorexia (57%), vomiting (38%), which were mostly grade 1/2, and thrombocytopenia (41%), which was mostly grade 3/4, but with very low rates of bleeding. The incidence of certain selinexor-related high grade (3/4) AEs was less in patients receiving 45-65mg selinexor vs those receiving > 65mg.
These data from Karyopharm’s extensive Phase 1 selinexor experience with selinexor corroborate our findings that a flat dose of 60mg is the most appropriate selinexor dose for both efficacy and tolerability in several settings, including older patients with AML. However, as is the case for many other anti-cancer drugs, certain indications will be treated with different doses.
Karyopharm’s new oncology pipeline candidates

In two oral presentations titled, "Nuclear Export Inhibitor KPT-8602 is Highly Active Against Leukemic Blasts and Leukemia-Initiating Cells in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of AML" and "Next Generation XPO1 Inhibitor Shows Improved Efficacy and In Vivo Tolerability in Hematologic Malignancies" and a poster titled "Next Generation XPO1 Inhibitor KPT-8602 for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Multiple Myeloma," Karyopharm researchers and collaborators demonstrated the potential of this second generation SINE compound for higher and/or more frequent dosing with KPT-8602 compared with selinexor. Based on these data, Karyopharm plans to initiate a focused Phase 1 MM study with KPT-8602 in the first quarter of 2016.

Finally, in two posters titled, "In Vitro and In Vivo Anti-Leukemic Effects of PAK4 Allosteric Modulators in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Promising Results Justifying Further Development" and "Dissecting Signaling Network Responses to PAK4 Allosteric Modulators in Cell Subsets within Primary Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Samples," encouraging preclinical activity was reported with KPT-9274 (PAK4/NAMPT inhibitor) and based on these data, Karyopharm plans to initiate clinical development in patients with heavily pretreated solid tumors or lymphoma in the first half of 2016.

Selinexor single-agent hematologic studies enrollment updates
Karyopharm is actively enrolling patients in four later phase clinical studies evaluating single-agent selinexor: one in older patients with relapsed/refractory AML (SOPRA study), the second in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (SADAL study), the third in patients with MM (STORM study) and the fourth in patients with Richter’s transformation (SIRRT study). Interim data are expected from the SOPRA and STORM studies in the middle of 2016. In conjunction with discussions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Karyopharm has amended the protocol for its ongoing Selinexor Against Diffuse Aggressive Lymphoma (SADAL) study in patients with heavily pretreated DLBCL to remove dexamethasone from the regimen and evaluate selinexor as a single-agent in this patient population and to adjust SADAL’s inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study will continue to compare 60mg and 100mg twice weekly doses of selinexor with 100 patients per arm. Based on these amendments, the company expects to report top-line data from this study in the first quarter of 2017.

About selinexor
Selinexor (KPT-330) is a first-in-class, oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound. Selinexor functions by binding to and inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1 (also called CRM1), leading to the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the cell nucleus. This reinitiates and amplifies their tumor suppressor function and is believed to lead to the selective induction of apoptosis in cancer cells, while largely sparing normal cells. Over 1,300 patients have been treated with selinexor in company and investigator-sponsored Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials in advanced hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Karyopharm has initiated four later-phase clinical trials of selinexor, including one in older patients with AML (SOPRA), one in patients with Richter’s transformation (SIRRT), one in patients with DLBCL (SADAL) and a single-arm trial of selinexor and lose-dose dexamethasone in patients with MM (STORM). Karyopharm plans to initiate a Phase 2/3 clinical study (SCORE) in early 2016 to evaluate the combination of selinexor, carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. In solid tumors, Karyopharm plans to initiate a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 trial of selinexor to treat liposarcoma during the fourth quarter of 2015. Additional Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies are ongoing or currently planned, including multiple studies in combination with one or more approved therapies in a variety of tumor types to further inform the company’s clinical development priorities for selinexor. The latest clinical trial information for selinexor is available at www.clinicaltrials.gov.