Hospira Japan Receives Approval of Additional Dosage/Administration for "Paclitaxel I.V. infusion [Hospira]"

On September 27, 2015 Hospira Japan Co., Ltd. reported that the company has received an approval for the additional dosage/administration of gastric cancer for "Paclitaxel I.V. infusion [Hospira]" by a new drug application (NDA) based on evidence in the public domain with the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan (Press release, Hospira, SEP 27, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2090640 [SID:1234507569]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

[Product name]
1. Paclitaxel I.V. lnfusion 30mg/5mL [Hospira]
2. Paclitaxel I.V. lnfusion 100mg/16.7mL [Hospira]

[Therapeutic Category]
Anticancer drug

[Dosage /administration for gastric cancer]
The underlined text represents the additional dosage/administration.

Method A or E are used for gastric cancer.
Method A: Normally for adults 210 mg/m2 (body surface area) in terms of Paclitaxel is administered over 3 hours in a single infusion, with intervals of at least three weeks between doses. This forms one course, which is repeated.
Method E: Normally for adults 80 mg/m2 (body surface area) in terms of paclitaxel is administered over 1 hour in a single infusion, once per week for three successive weeks, followed by an interval of at least two weeks. This forms one course, which is repeated.
Doses may be suitably reduced having regard to the condition of the patient.

On the basis of the requirement of the additional dosage/administration for gastric cancer for originator, which includes Paclitaxel, the report was prepared by the "Review Committee on Unapproved Drugs and Indications with High Medical Needs." The decision was made based on the report at the meeting of the Second Committee on New Drugs, Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sedation Council, held on March 5, 2015, which confirmed that filing through the "NDA based on evidence in the public domain" was reasonable for this additional dosage/administration.

The MHLW notification related to "NDA based on evidence in the public domain" for generics recommends pharmaceutical companies work on filing for additional dosage/administration for generic at the same time as originators. Hospira Japan filed this additional dosage/administration for "Paclitaxel I.V. infusion 30mg/5mL [Hospira] " and "Paclitaxel I.V. infusion 100mg/16.7mL [Hospira] " by "NDA based on evidence in the public domain."

Hospira Japan is committed to contributing to healthcare in Japan by providing value-added products with its broad portfolio and meeting the expectations of patients and healthcare professionals.

Ignyta Announces Updated Interim Data from Entrectinib Phase 1 Clinical Trials at the 2015 European Cancer Congress

On September 27, 2015 Ignyta, Inc. (Nasdaq: RXDX), a precision oncology biotechnology company, reported that updated interim results of its Phase 1 clinical trials of entrectinib, the company’s proprietary oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting solid tumors that harbor activating alterations to NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, ROS1 or ALK, were presented in an oral presentation session at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (ECC 2015) in Vienna, Austria (Press release, Ignyta, SEP 27, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507570]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We continue to be excited by the data from our two Phase 1 clinical trials of entrectinib, particularly in patients who would meet the anticipated eligibility criteria for our planned Phase 2 clinical trials," said Pratik Multani, M.D., Chief Medical Officer of Ignyta. "Out of the 18 patients in the two studies who met these criteria, we observed 13 responses, for an overall response rate of 72% across multiple tumor histologies. In addition, based upon an increased dataset of 92 patients, we have been able to confirm entrectinib’s acceptable safety profile for further development at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). We intend to use this clinical experience as the basis for STARTRK-2, our planned, potentially registration-enabling Phase 2 clinical trial of entrectinib."

The clinical trials included the ALKA-372-001 study and the STARTRK-1 study, which is the first of the "Studies of Tumor Alterations Responsive to Targeting Receptor Kinases". Both trials were designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose, as well as preliminary anti-cancer activity, of single agent entrectinib in patients with solid tumors with the relevant molecular alterations: NTRK1 (encoding TrkA), ROS1 or ALK for ALKA-372-001 and NTRK1/2/3 (encoding TrkA/TrkB/TrkC), ROS1 or ALK for STARTRK-1.

As of the August 15, 2015, data cut-off for the presentation, the findings showed:

A total of 92 patients with a range of solid tumors had been dosed across both clinical trials, with nine patients treated at or above the RP2D beyond six months and one patient beyond one year.

Entrectinib was well tolerated to date:
Across both studies, the most frequent (>10% incidence) treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, dysgeusia, paresthesia, nausea, and myalgia. Seven of these were Grade 3 in severity, consisting of fatigue (4 patients), cognitive impairment (2 patients), and diarrhea (1 patient). No Grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed;

Across both studies, there were only three treatment-related serious adverse events: Grade 3 cognitive impairment and Grade 3 myocarditis, both of which occurred above the RP2D, and Grade 2 fatigue. All events were reversible and resolved upon dose modification;

The fixed daily dose RP2D was determined to be 600 mg, taken orally once per day (QD);
18 patients across both clinical trials met the company’s expected Phase 2 eligibility criteria, which include:
Presence of NTRK1/2/3, ROS1 or ALK gene rearrangements, as opposed to other types of molecular alterations (e.g., SNPs, amplifications, deletions);

ALK-inhibitor and/or ROS1-inhibitor naïve; and

Treatment at or above the RP2D;

The response rate in the 18 patients who met these criteria across both studies was 72% (13 responses out of 18 treated patients, as assessed by the clinical sites). Nine of these responders remain on study treatment with durable responses of up to 21 treatment cycles. An additional 3 patients remain on study with stable disease. The responses included:

3 responses out of 4 patients with NTRK1/2/3 gene rearrangements, including patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer and salivary gland cancer, with one of the responding patients remaining on treatment at 6 months; a fourth patient with an astrocytoma remains on treatment after two months with stable disease;

6 responses, including one complete response, out of 8 patients with ROS1 gene rearrangements, all of which were in NSCLC. All of the patients who responded remain on treatment, the longest at 21 months; and

4 responses out of 6 patients with ALK gene rearrangements, including two NSCLC patients and two patients with other solid tumors; two of the 4 responders subsequently progressed.

Entrectinib has demonstrated objective tumor response in the central nervous system (CNS), a frequent site of metastases and progression of advanced solid tumors.

On Wednesday, September 30, 2015, Ignyta will file a Form-8-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) containing the materials presented at the ECC 2015. The company’s SEC filings can be found on the company’s website at www.ignyta.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Aduro Biotech Announces Phase 1b Mesothelioma Trial Featured in Spotlight Poster at ESMO/ECC

On September 26, 2015 Aduro Biotech, Inc. (Nasdaq:ADRO) reported the presentation of updated, interim safety and efficacy data from an ongoing Phase 1b clinical trial of its novel immunotherapy, CRS-207, in combination with standard of care chemotherapy in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (Press release, Aduro BioTech, SEP 26, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2090581 [SID:1234507554]). Of the 34 evaluable patients, disease control was observed in 94% (32/34), including 59% (20/34) with partial responses and 35% (12/34) experiencing stable disease following treatment with CRS-207 and chemotherapy. Of note, in three patients who had tumor biopsies completed, biomarker analysis data available at the time of the presentation showed in all three patients a consistent and marked recruitment of immune cells, including CD8+ T-cells, dendritic cells and natural killer cells, following treatment with CRS-207.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The results were presented by Raffit Hassan, M.D., co-chief of the Thoracic and GI Oncology Branch at the National Cancer Institute, in a spotlight poster presentation (abstract #515/P249) at the 40TH European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper)/18TH European Cancer Congress (ECC) being held September 25-29, 2015 in Vienna, Austria.

"The data in this trial continue to be impressive in the front-line treatment of mesothelioma," said Dr. Hassan. "We are encouraged by the high disease control rate in patients treated with this combination and will continue to evaluate and track the durability of the responses, which are ongoing."

Dirk G. Brockstedt, Ph.D., senior vice president of Research and Development at Aduro added, "Our new immunohistochemistry biomarker data is interesting as it is supports our hypothesis that the tumor microenvironment is altered by our immunotherapy. These data show an increase of tumor-attacking immune cells recruited and deployed where they are needed most. We look forward to presenting final results from this trial with additional biomarker data in 2016. As previously announced, based on the compelling data thus far, we plan to advance the combination regimen with CRS-207 and chemotherapy into a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial in the front-line setting."

At the time of the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) presentation, the multi-center Phase 1b study had completed enrollment with 38 patients who were chemotherapy-naïve, with unresectable MPM, good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1) and adequate organ function. Under the trial design, eligible patients received two treatments with CRS-207 two weeks apart, followed by up to six cycles of standard of care pemetrexed and cisplatin chemotherapy three weeks apart and two CRS-207 treatments three weeks apart. Clinically stable patients receive CRS-207 maintenance courses every eight weeks and are followed until disease progression. Objectives of the study are safety, immunogenicity, objective tumor responses and tumor marker kinetics.

Median duration of response was 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.7 – 16.7 months) and median progression free survival was 8.5 months (95% CI: 6.9 – 10.8 months). No treatment-related serious adverse events or unexpected toxicities were observed. Treatment, follow-up and immune response evaluations are ongoing.

About Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma is a form of cancer that affects the smooth layer of mesothelial cells that surround the chest, lungs, heart and abdomen. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), which affects the thin balloon-shaped lining of the lungs, is the most common form of this disease and accounts for approximately 3,000 cases a year in the United States. MPM is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Most MPM patients are not candidates for surgical resection. Based on prior studies, expected median time to progression is 5.7 months and median overall survival is 12.1 months with combination pemetrexed and cisplatin chemotherapy. The tumor-associated antigen mesothelin is overexpressed on the majority of mesothelioma tumors.

About CRS-207

CRS-207 is one of a family of product candidates based on Aduro’s live-attenuated, double-deleted (LADD) Listeria monocytogenes immunotherapy platform that induces a potent innate and T cell-mediated adaptive immune response. CRS-207 has been engineered to express the tumor-associated antigen mesothelin, which is over-expressed in many cancers including mesothelioma and pancreatic, non-small cell lung, ovarian, endometrial and gastric cancers.

Updated Enzalutamide Data in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress

On September 26, 2015 Medivation, Inc. (NASDAQ: MDVN) reported updated data from a Phase 2 trial evaluating the investigational use of enzalutamide as a single agent for the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (Press release, Medivation, SEP 26, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507573]). Results from an exploratory overall survival analysis of study data were presented during an oral plenary session at the 2015 European Cancer Congress in Vienna, Austria. The presentation was selected to be featured in the upcoming "Highlights Session" of the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are excited by these updated data as we continue to monitor patients in the trial. Findings from the provisional analysis demonstrate the potential for a diagnostic test to help select women with this particularly aggressive type of breast cancer who may benefit from enzalutamide treatment," said Javier Cortés, M.D., director of the breast cancer program at Vall D’Hebron Institute of Oncology and head of the breast cancer program at Ramon y Cajal University Hospital in Madrid. "This finding is promising and potentially important for patients with TNBC."

A novel gene expression profiling assay was developed using data derived from the Phase 2 trial in patients with advanced TNBC, with a goal of developing a diagnostic test that could select patients who may respond to enzalutamide treatment. Nearly half of the enrolled patients (47%) tested positive for the novel gene expression profiling assay. An exploratory analysis of updated overall survival data demonstrated that those TNBC patients on enzalutamide whose tumors tested positive for the gene expression profile ("diagnostic positive") have to date experienced a 10.5-month longer median survival duration compared to those patients on enzalutamide whose tumor tested negative for the gene expression profile ("diagnostic negative"). The exploratory analysis demonstrated that median overall survival to date for diagnostic positive advanced TNBC patients treated with enzalutamide was 18.0 months (95% CI: 12.0-21.3) compared with 7.5 months for diagnostic negative advanced TNBC patients treated with enzalutamide (95% CI: 4.8 – 11.2).

Medivation released its initial exploratory analysis of then current overall survival data at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in June 2015. At that time, the median overall survival in patients whose TNBC was diagnostic positive was not yet reached (95% CI: 12.9 months – not yet reached) and for those with diagnostic negative TNBC the median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.8 – 11.2). Medivation provided full details of the trial design in its Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2015.

The most common (reported in ≥ 10% of patients) adverse events reported as related to enzalutamide treatment in the intent-to-treat population were fatigue (35%), nausea (26%), decreased appetite (13%), diarrhea (10%), and hot flush (10%).

"The data presented today highlight the potential advantages of using a novel genomic profiling assay to identify patients who might respond to treatments," said Amy Peterson, M.D., vice president of clinical development at Medivation. "This approach could have implications for future development of targeted therapies in triple negative breast cancer."

About the Phase 2 Study
The Phase 2 open label single arm, multicenter trial enrolled 118 women with advanced TNBC that expressed any amount of androgen receptor by immunohistochemistry. The objective of the study was to evaluate the benefit of enzalutamide, 160 mg/day orally, as single agent therapy for advanced TNBC and to identify an appropriate biomarker to help select those women more likely to respond to therapy. The primary endpoint of the trial was the clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks (CBR16), defined as the proportion of women with a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease for at least 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints of the trial included clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24), and progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from the date of first dose of study drug until documented disease progression or death due to any cause.

XTANDI is not approved for the treatment of advanced AR positive, TNBC. The diagnostic referred to in this press release is neither approved nor commercially available.

About XTANDI (enzalutamide) capsules
XTANDI is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Enzalutamide Mechanism of Action
Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor that acts on three different steps in the androgen receptor signaling pathway.

XTANDI (enzalutamide) capsules HCP Important Safety Information
Important Safety Information
Contraindications XTANDI is not indicated for women and is contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant. XTANDI can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman.

Warnings and Precautions
Seizure In Study 1, conducted in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who previously received docetaxel, seizure occurred in 0.9% of XTANDI patients and 0% of placebo patients. In Study 2, conducted in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic CRPC, seizure occurred in 0.1% of XTANDI patients and 0.1% of placebo patients. There is no clinical trial experience readministering XTANDI to patients who experienced a seizure, and limited safety data are available in patients with predisposing factors for seizure. Study 1 excluded the use of concomitant medications that may lower threshold; Study 2 permitted the use of these medications. Because of the risk of seizure associated with XTANDI use, patients should be advised of the risk of engaging in any activity during which sudden loss of consciousness could cause serious harm to themselves or others. Permanently discontinue XTANDI in patients who develop a seizure during treatment.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) In post approval use, there have been reports of PRES in patients receiving XTANDI. PRES is a neurological disorder which can present with rapidly evolving symptoms including seizure, headache, lethargy, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurological disturbances, with or without associated hypertension. A diagnosis of PRES requires confirmation by brain imaging, preferably MRI. Discontinue XTANDI in patients who develop PRES.

Adverse Reactions
The most common adverse reactions ( ≥ 10%) reported from two combined clinical studies that occurred more commonly ( ≥ 2% over placebo) in XTANDI patients were asthenia/fatigue, back pain, decreased appetite, constipation, arthralgia, diarrhea, hot flush, upper respiratory tract infection, peripheral edema, dyspnea, musculoskeletal pain, weight decreased, headache, hypertension, and dizziness/vertigo.

In Study 1, Grade 3 and higher adverse reactions were reported among 47% of XTANDI patients and 53% of placebo patients. Discontinuations due to adverse events were reported for 16% of XTANDI patients and 18% of placebo patients. In Study 2, Grade 3-4 adverse reactions were reported in 44% of XTANDI patients and 37% of placebo patients. Discontinuations due to adverse events were reported for 6% of both study groups.

Lab Abnormalities: Grade 1-4 neutropenia occurred in 15% of XTANDI patients (1% Grade 3-4) and 6% of placebo patients (0.5% Grade 3-4). Grade 1-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 6% of XTANDI patients (0.3% Grade 3-4) and 5% of placebo patients (0.5% Grade 3-4). Grade 1-4 elevations in ALT occurred in 10% of XTANDI patients (0.2% Grade 3-4) and 16% of placebo patients (0.2% Grade 3-4). Grade 1-4 elevations in bilirubin occurred in 3% of XTANDI patients (0.1% Grade 3-4) and 2% of placebo patients (no Grade 3-4).

Infections: In Study 1, 1% of XTANDI patients compared to 0.3% of placebo patients died from infections or sepsis. In Study 2, 1 patient in each treatment group (0.1%) had an infection resulting in death.

Falls (including fall-related injuries), occurred in 9% of XTANDI patients and 4% of placebo patients. Falls were not associated with loss of consciousness or seizure. Fall-related injuries were more severe in XTANDI patients, and included non-pathologic fractures, joint injuries, and hematomas.

Hypertension occurred in 11% of XTANDI patients and 4% of placebo patients. No patients experienced hypertensive crisis. Medical history of hypertension was balanced between arms. Hypertension led to study discontinuation in < 1% of all patients.

Drug Interactions
Effect of Other Drugs on XTANDI Avoid strong CYP2C8 inhibitors, as they can increase the plasma exposure to XTANDI. If co-administration cannot be avoided, reduce the dose of XTANDI.

Avoid strong or moderate CYP3A4 or CYP2C8 inducers as they can alter the plasma exposure to XTANDI.

Effect of XTANDI on Other Drugs Avoid CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index, as XTANDI may decrease the plasma exposures of these drugs. If XTANDI is co-administered with warfarin (CYP2C9 substrate), conduct additional INR monitoring.

ECC 2015: GIOTRIF® (afatinib) demonstrates superior survival compared to Tarceva® (erlotinib) for patients with previously treated advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, independent of EGFR mutation status

On September 28, 2015 Boehringer Ingelheim reported at the European Cancer Congress (ECC) in Vienna, Austria, new data from the Phase III LUX-Lung 8 trial which further highlights the benefits of afatinib* compared to erlotinib for the treatment of patients with previously treated advanced SCC of the lung (Press release, Boehringer Ingelheim, SEP 26, 2015, View Source [SID:1234507556]).2 Data from the trial showed that treatment with afatinib resulted in superior progression-free survival (PFS) and superior overall survival (OS) compared to erlotinib in this patient population.2 These improved survival outcomes observed with afatinib were not driven by the presence of EGFR mutations, according to a new analysis presented at ECC.2 Furthermore, a higher number patients treated with afatinib in the LUX-Lung 8 trial reported improvements in overall health and quality of life, as well as improvements in some lung cancer-related symptoms, compared to those treated with erlotinib.3

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

LUX-Lung 8 clinical trial investigator Glen D. Goss, M.D., Director of Clinical and Translational Research, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Canada, commented: "These latest data not only demonstrate benefits of afatinib compared to erlotinib for patients with SCC of the lung, but also suggest that afatinib is an effective treatment option for a broad group of patients and not just those whose tumours harbour EGFR mutations. We know that dysregulation of ErbB receptors plays a role in the underlying mechanisms of SCC of the lung and the fact that afatinib targets this family of receptors rather than only EGFR, may explain why it offered additional benefits for this patient population."

Afatinib is an oral, once daily targeted treatment which works by irreversibly blocking the ErbB family of receptors. Unlike other targeted treatments such as erlotinib which are reversible and specifically target EGFR (ErbB1), afatinib aims to provide a sustained, selective and complete ErbB Family Blockade. The Phase III LUX-Lung 8 trial compared afatinib to erlotinib in patients with advanced SCC of the lung progressing after treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Data from the trial showed that treatment with afatinib resulted in superior PFS, reducing the risk of cancer progression by 19%, and superior OS, reducing the risk of death by 19% compared to erlotinib in this patient population.1,2 The PFS and OS advantages observed with afatinib compared to erlotinib were independent of the EGFR mutation status of the tumours analysed from this trial.2

Further data presented at ECC confirm the efficacy of afatinib observed in the LUX-Lung 8 trial was associated with improvements in patient reported outcomes.3 More patients had improved overall health-related quality-of-life (36% vs 28%, p=0•041), cough (43% vs 35%, p=0•029) and dyspnoea (51% vs 44%, p=0•061) with afatinib than with erlotinib.3 The rate of severe adverse events in the LUX-Lung 8 trial was similar between the two treatment arms with differences observed in the incidence of certain side effects.1 A higher incidence of severe diarrhoea and stomatitis (mouth sores) was observed with afatinib compared to erlotinib (grade 3 diarrhoea: 10% vs 2%; grade 3 stomatitis: 4% vs 0%), while a higher incidence of severe rash/acne was reported with erlotinib compared to afatinib (grade 3 rash/acne: 10% vs 6%).1 Diarrhoea occurring in patients treated with afatinib was manageable.3

Dr. Mehdi Shahidi, Medical Head, Solid Tumour Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim commented: "We are pleased to present these data at ECC 2015 which confirm that the advantages of afatinib, compared to erlotinib, are not limited to patients with squamous cell lung cancer whose tumours expressed EGFR mutations, which are rare in this disease. The LUX-Lung 8 trial shows that treatment with afatinib versus erlotinib not only leads to improved survival outcomes but also offered patients an improved quality of life. Afatinib is under review by both the FDA and EMA for the treatment of SCC of the lung and we look forward to working with regulatory authorities in the hope of making this much needed new treatment option available to patients."

Afatinib is currently approved in more than 60 countries for the first-line treatment of specific types of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (under brand names: GIOTRIF / GILOTRIF). Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have recently accepted filing applications for afatinib for the treatment of patients with advanced SCC of the lung progressing after treatment with first-line chemotherapy, based on the positive PFS and OS data from the LUX-Lung 8 trial. Afatinib has also been granted orphan drug designation by the FDA – a status given to a product intended for the treatment of a rare disease or condition.