Oncolytics Biotech® Inc. Collaborators Present REOLYSIN® Preclinical Data at the 9th International Conference on Oncolytic Virus Therapeutics

On June 15, 2015 Oncolytics Biotech reported that a series of oral and poster presentations are being made by the Company’s research collaborators at the 9th International Conference on Oncolytic Virus Therapeutics being held from June 13th to 16th, 2015 in Boston MA (Press release, Oncolytics Biotech, JUN 15, 2015, View Source [SID:1234505435]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Our preclinical program continues to identify new potential therapeutic combinations as well as advance our understanding of how REOLYSIN works," said Dr. Brad Thompson, President and CEO of Oncolytics. "This work is an important part of the ongoing development of our proprietary formulation of the human reovirus."

Dr. Richard Vile is making an oral presentation regarding previously disclosed findings around augmenting tumor-specific natural killer (NK) responses and specifically attenuating tumor-specific immunosuppression. These data also suggest that the combination of PD-1 inhibition therapy with reovirus oncolytic/immunotherapy represents a readily translatable method to enhance the therapeutic efficacy.

The first abstract/poster titled "Targeting peripheral and lymph node resistant CLL with combination reovirus therapy," was authored by Melcher, et al. The authors studied chronic lymphocytic leukemia ("CLL") and the problems associated with eradicating minimal residual disease and drug resistance. They concluded that the combination of reovirus and ABT-263 could increase direct and immune-mediated killing of peripheral disease and that reovirus in combination with Fludarabine may be useful in targeting drug-resistant lymph node disease.

The second abstract/poster titled "Oncolysis by reovirus as an immune priming mechanism with VSV-cDNA immunological boosting treats large established tumors," was authored by Melcher, et al. The authors looked at the treatment of established B16 melanoma tumors in a mouse model. They concluded that the local killing of cancer cells by one virus primed the immune system and, by using tumor antigens expressed from a second virus, it was possible to generate potent immunological responses that led to the rejection of well established tumors.

The third abstract/poster titled "Monocyte carriage and delivery of reovirus-antibody complexes for melanoma oncolysis," was authored by Melcher, et al. The authors studied preexisting antiviral immunity and found evidence that there is an alternative mechanism by which systemically administered reovirus may gain access to tumors, even in the presence of neutralizing antibodies.

8-K – Current report

On June 15, 2015 Karyopharm Therapeutics reported the presentation of positive clinical data for its lead product candidate, selinexor (KPT-330), a first-in-class, oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export / SINE compound, at the 20th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) 2015 Annual Meeting held June 11-14, 2015 in Vienna, Austria (Filing, 8-K, Karyopharm, JUN 15, 2015, View Source [SID:1234505437]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In an ongoing Phase 1b company-sponsored clinical trial evaluating the activity of single-agent selinexor (doses of 3-80mg/m2) in heavily pre-treated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), selinexor demonstrated a 43% overall response rate (partial response or better) in patients on study greater than one month, and a 31% overall response rate across all doses in the intention to treat population, with a median duration of response (DOR) of greater than nine months. Similar responses were observed in both GCB and non-GCB subtypes. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 4.6 months and 1.7 months, respectively, for the entire study. In patients with a response to selinexor (N=12), the median OS was greater than 10 months (median not reached) and PFS was 24 months, significantly longer than those without a response (N=27; OS 3.5 months, PFS 1.2 months). Adverse events were manageable with standard supportive care and clinically significant cumulative toxicities were not observed, with several patients remaining on selinexor for more than one year.

Additional clinical data on selinexor’s activity in DLBCL, including in patients with double-hit DLBCL, will be provided in an oral presentation on Saturday June 20, 2015, at 10:50 CEST by Dr. Ramiro Garzon from the Ohio State University at the 13th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland.

Initial data from the ongoing Selinexor AraC Idarubicin Leukemia, or "SAIL," study, an investigator-sponsored Phase 2 clinical trial of selinexor with intensive chemotherapy (idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside [Ara-C]) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that relapsed after standard intensive induction chemotherapy, were also reported. In 18 evaluable patients, the combination of selinexor (40 mg/m2) with idarubicin/Ara-C demonstrated a 56% overall response rate, including nine patients with complete remission (CR/CRi) and one patient with a partial remission. Adverse events were manageable with standard supportive care and dose adjustments.

"We are excited by these promising data presented at EHA (Free EHA Whitepaper), which continue to demonstrate the vast potential of selinexor across hematologic malignancies and provide further evidence of selinexor’s broad and durable activity, both as a single agent and in combination therapy," said Sharon Shacham, PhD, MBA, President and Chief Scientific Officer of Karyopharm. "The correlation between response and prolonged survival demonstrated in heavily pretreated DLBCL patients suggests that responses to selinexor may confer a clinical benefit in this very difficult to treat population and support the ongoing

SADAL study in this group of patients. Moreover, the preliminary clinical data in patients with relapsed/refractory AML suggest that selinexor can be combined effectively with manageable side effects. These findings represent the reported clinical data of selinexor in combination with intensive chemotherapy and suggest that selinexor can enhance the activity of these agents with manageable side effects."

Selinexor data in DLBCL were described during an oral presentation by Dr. Ramiro Garzon of the Ohio State University on Saturday, June 13, entitled "Patients with Heavily Pretreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) who Respond to Oral Selinexor Therapy Show Prolonged Survival: Updated Phase 1 Results." These data from an ongoing Phase 1b clinical study of single-agent selinexor (3-80 mg/m2 oral doses) in patients with DLBCL were as of June 1, 2015 and included the following highlights:

• Among 28 response evaluable patients (per protocol defined as those patients on study for at least one month), the ORR was 43% and the disease control rate (stable disease or better) was 71%. Responses included four patients (14%) who achieved a complete response as confirmed by PET scan, eight patients (29%) who achieved a partial response and 8 patients (29%) with stable disease.

• Among 39 patients treated across all doses, the ORR was 31% and the disease control rate (stable disease or better) was 51%.

• Duration of response was greater than nine months.

• Patients with a response to selinexor (N=12), achieved OS of greater than ten months (median not reached) and PFS of 24 months which were significantly longer than those without a response (N=27; OS 3.5 months, PFS 1.2 months).

• The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 4.6 months and 1.7 months, respectively, for the entire study.

• Selinexor showed similar activity in both GCB and non-GCB subtypes of DLBCL.
In a late-breaking poster presented on Saturday, June 13, entitled "Preliminary Phase II Results of Ara-C And Idarubicin in Combination with Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML," Dr. Walter Fiedler of the University Medical Center Hamburg and colleagues described preliminary data from the ongoing Phase 2 SAIL clinical trial demonstrating that selinexor in combination with standard doses of Ara-C and idarubicin is a potentially effective strategy for treating patients with AML that was relapsed or refractory after at least one line of chemotherapy. All data are as of April 27, 2015 and highlights include:

• An overall response rate of 56% was achieved based on 18 evaluable patients with three patients (17%) achieving complete remission (CR), six patients (33%) achieving complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) and one patient (6%) achieving partial remission (PR).

• Ten patients (56%) received or were expected to receive either stem cell transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion.

• Adverse events were manageable with standard supportive care and dose adjustments.
An additional poster was presented on Saturday, June 13, entitled "XPO1 Inhibition Using Selinexor Synergizes with Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) by Targeting DNA Repair Genes" by Dr. Romero Garzon of the Ohio State University. In that preclinical study, Dr. Garzon and colleagues showed that selinexor synergizes with anthracyclines and other topoisomerase 2 inhibitors by preventing AML cells from repairing their DNA after damage by the chemotherapy. This study provides the scientific rationale for the ongoing SAIL study described above and additional studies with topoisomerase 2 inhibitors, as well as mechanistic insights into the use of selinexor with other chemotherapeutic agents.

About Selinexor
Selinexor (KPT-330) is a first-in-class, oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export / SINE compound. Selinexor functions by binding with and inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1 (also called CRM1), leading to the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the cell nucleus, which subsequently reinitiates and amplifies their tumor suppressor function. This is believed to lead to the selective induction of apoptosis in cancer cells, while largely sparing normal cells. Over 900 patients have been treated with selinexor in company- and investigator-sponsored Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials in advanced hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Karyopharm has initiated four registration-directed clinical trials of selinexor, including one in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (SOPRA), one in patients with Richter’s transformation (SIRRT) and one in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SADAL). A single-arm trial of selinexor in patients with multiple myeloma (STORM) that is also intended to be registration-directed was initiated in May 2015. In solid tumors, Karyopharm plans to initiate a registration-directed trial of selinexor to treat liposarcoma during the second half of 2015. Additional Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies are ongoing or currently planned, including multiple studies in combination with one or more approved therapies in a variety of tumor types to further inform the company’s clinical development priorities for selinexor. The latest clinical trial information for selinexor is available at www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Actavis plc is now Allergan plc

On June 15, 2015 Actavis reported that the company has adopted Allergan plc (NYSE: AGN) as its new global name and will begin trading today under a new symbol — AGN — after ringing The Opening Bell at the New York Stock Exchange (Press release, Actavis, JUN 15, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2059261 [SID:1234505439]). The company name change follows the acquisition of Allergan in March 2015 and the approval of the name change by Actavis shareholders on June 5. The combination of Allergan and Actavis created one of the world’s top 10 pharmaceutical companies by revenue and a leader in a new industry model – Growth Pharma.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Today is an exciting day for Allergan and our 30,000 employees around the world who have helped us reach this special moment," said Brent Saunders, CEO and President of Allergan. "By adopting the Allergan name, we are ensuring that our corporate identity reflects the transformation of our company within the pharmaceutical industry and our position as a dynamic new breed of company – a leader in Growth Pharma. Today, under one company name and identity, we set out on a new path forward, encouraging our employees across the globe to be bold in how we think and act, to engage and to move quickly to meet the needs of physicians, patients and customers.

"Allergan is home to world-renowned brands, the best-in-class global generics business, a premier pharmaceutical pipeline of medicines including brands, generics, biosimilars, OTC products and devices, as well as the fourth largest distributor in the U.S., which will retain the name Anda. Allergan’s fully integrated business provides unique opportunities to respond quickly to customer and patient needs, and change the lives of those who depend on us."

Allergan has initiated a rebranding campaign that will guide the transition of its facilities, operations and commercial presence around the world to the new company name. The company has launched a new global web site at www.Allergan.com. Based on feedback received from customers, the company’s U.S. and Canadian generics business will continue to operate under the Actavis name, capitalizing on its exceptional brand equity among customers.

Allergan has also today adopted a distinctive redesign of the company identity and logo. The new icon in the logo speaks to the strength of the Company’s unique capabilities, the energy and passion of its people and its forward momentum. The circular shapes personify movement; purposeful paths of change and growth; growing spheres of influence and ideas; and achievement across brands and generics.

The result is a new, momentum-building and accessible visualization that celebrates Allergan’s emergence as a Growth Pharma leader. Together, all united, all moving, resulting in an evolving, growing Company focused on a singular purpose – to power bold ideas in healthcare for people around the world.

Tosedostat In Combination With Low Dose Cytarabine Achieves Primary Endpoint In Phase 2 Study In Elderly Patients With AML

On June 15, 2015 CTI BioPharma reported findings from an investigator-sponsored Phase 2 trial in patients with either primary (de novo) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML that has evolved from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (Press release, CTI BioPharma, JUN 14, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2059047 [SID:1234505424]). Results showed the combination of tosedostat with low dose cytarabine/Ara-C (LDAC) resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 54 percent in elderly patients with AML – with 45 percent of patients achieving durable complete responses (CR). These final results were presented by Dr. Giuseppe Visani, Director of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Center at AORMN, Pesaro, Italy in a poster session (abstract #P564) during the 20th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper), June 11-14, 2015 in Vienna, Austria.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

AML is the most common acute leukemia affecting adults, and its incidence increases with age. AML may develop from the progression of other diseases, such as MDS, which is a blood cancer that also affects the bone marrow and leads to a decrease in circulating red blood cells. Tosedostat is a potential first-in-class selective inhibitor of aminopeptidases, which are required by tumor cells to provide amino acids necessary for growth and tumor cell survival.

"Both the types and length of responses in this trial with tosedostat are very encouraging – particularly given the limited options and poor outcomes historically observed in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia, either de novo or secondary after myelodysplastic syndrome," said Dr. Visani. "Importantly, through this study we have also identified potential biomarkers that may help identify high-risk patients in which we are more likely to see these clinically meaningful results – the findings of which are quite compelling and warrant further study."

Findings Presented at EHA (Free EHA Whitepaper)
Final results presented at EHA (Free EHA Whitepaper) show that responding patients had a significant improvement in overall survival based on response rates compared to non-responding patients (p=0.018). In the intent-to-treat population (ITT), the ORR was 54 percent – with CR observed in 45 percent of patients (n=15/33). In the responding patients, the median time for achieving best response was 74 days (range: 22-145 days) and 55 percent (n=10/18) were still in remission after a median follow-up of 319 days. Safety analysis show that tosedostat in combination with LDAC was generally well tolerated. The primary adverse events observed were pneumonitis (12 percent), cardiac (6 percent), brain hemorrhage (3 percent), and asthenia (3 percent).

One of the secondary endpoints was to identify possible biomarkers associated with sensitivity and/or drug resistance. A gene expression profile (GEP) was performed on purified AML cells obtained from 29 patients. Analysis of these patient cells identified a molecular signature associated with clinical response (CR vs. no CR). Based on the differentially expressed genes (n=212), samples were divided according to either CR or no CR. Results showed that these differentially expressed genes were associated with relevant biological functions and pathways – including B-catenin (beta-catenin), TNFA-NFkB, ERB2, inflammatory response, and epithelial-mesenchimal transition – and showed that the achievement of a CR could be efficiently predicted by GEP.

"The results observed with tosedostat in acute myeloid leukemia add to a growing body of data showing the anti-tumor activity of this aminopeptidase inhibitor and the potential of using this approach to treat blood-related cancers," Alan K. Burnett, M.D., Global Lead for Myeloid Diseases at CTI BioPharma. "Based on the clinical data observed to date, we are advancing the development for tosedostat including the potential for a Phase 3 registrational study for primary acute myeloid leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia that evolves from myelodysplastic syndrome."

About the Study Design
The Phase 2 multicenter clinical trial was designed to assess tosedostat (orally once-daily) in combination with intermittent LDAC (twice daily) in 33 elderly patients (median age = 75 years) with either primary AML or secondary AML after MDS. Courses of LDAC were repeated every four weeks for up to eight cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to exceed the upper limit of institutional expected CR rates (P0=10%, P1= 25%, α=0.05, 1-β=80%); secondary objectives include safety and toxicity, stable disease, overall survival, and progression-free survival as well as the identification of a possible biomarker associated with sensitivity and/or disease resistance through global gene expression profiling (GEP, Affymetrix Transciptome Array 2.0).

The poster for Abstract #P564 – "Tosedostat plus low dose cytarabine induces a high rate of responses that can be predicted by genetic profiling in AML: Final results of a Phase II multicenter study" – is available at www.ctibiopharma.com.

About Tosedostat
Tosedostat is an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor that has demonstrated anti-tumor responses in blood-related cancers and solid tumors in Phase 1-2 clinical trials. Tosedostat is currently being evaluated in multiple Phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of patients with AML or high-risk MDS and are intended to inform the design of a Phase 3 registration study to support potential regulatory approval. Tosedostat is not approved or commercially available.

About Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
AML is a cancer characterized by the rapid growth of abnormal white blood cells that accumulate in the bone marrow and interfere with the production of normal blood cells. AML is the most common acute leukemia affecting adults, and its incidence increases with age.1 The symptoms of AML are caused by the replacement of normal bone marrow with leukemic cells, which causes a drop in red blood cells, platelets, and normal white blood cells, leading to infections and bleeding. AML progresses rapidly and is typically fatal within weeks or months if left untreated. In 2015, approximately 20,830 new cases of AML are expected to be diagnosed in the United States and an estimated 10,460 are expected to die from the disease.2 While AML may occur at any age, adults at least 60 years of age are more likely than younger people to develop the disease.2 Although a substantial proportion of younger individuals who develop AML can be cured, AML in the elderly typically responds poorly to standard therapy with few complete remissions.

AML may develop from the progression of other diseases, such as MDS. MDS are a group of diverse bone marrow disorders in which the bone marrow does not produce enough healthy blood cells. MDS is often referred to as a "bone marrow failure disorder."

Results from Analyses of Revlimid® MCL-002 (SPRINT) Study Presented at EHA

On June 13, 2015 Celgene, a wholly owned subsidiary of Celgene Corporation reported two analyses of MCL-002 (SPRINT), its multi-center, open-label, phase II randomized trial comparing Revlimid (lenalidomide) with investigators’ choice (IC) in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), were presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) annual congress (Press release, Celgene, JUN 13, 2015, View Source [SID:1234505423]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In the study, 254 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either REVLIMID (n=170) or single agent cytarabine, rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine or chlorambucil (n=84). The primary efficacy endpoint was progression free survival, defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause. Secondary endpoints, including health-related quality of life (QoL) were analyzed in an exploratory manner.

The primary endpoint, median PFS was significantly improved for lenalidomide vs IC (8.7 vs 5.2 months; HR=0.61, P=0.004). A pre-specified exploratory analysis was presented and examined progression-free survival (PFS) in sub-groups based on prior therapies. Results examining the selected IC treatments in the study showed that REVLIMID provided a reduction in the risk of progression or death vs. each IC treatment. Compared with lenalidomide, and taking into account the small number of patients per IC group, the risk reduction in PFS was 22% vs. rituximab (n=27), 56% vs. gemcitabine (n=20), 42% vs. fludarabine (n=18), 43% vs. chlorambucil (n=11), and 8% vs. cytarabine (n=8).

An exploratory subgroup analysis of PFS based on prior treatment-related subgroups showed statistically improved PFS in several subgroups for REVLIMID over IC, including for patients with for less than 3 years from MCL diagnosis, at least 2 prior systemic therapies or relapses, at least 6 months from last therapy, at least 230 days from last rituximab dose, prior refractory disease, no prior stem cell transplant/high-dose therapy, and prior rituximab.

Treatment group was the main effect associated with significantly better PFS by univariate Cox regression analysis (HR=0.619; P=0.004), and was highly significant in the multivariate analysis (HR=0.384; P= < 0.001). Other factors associated with significantly better PFS by both univariate and multivariate analysis were less than 3 prior systemic anti-lymphoma therapies, and at least 230 days from last prior rituximab.

Also presented was a planned secondary study endpoint of the study. Quality of life (QoL) was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, after cycles 2, 4, 6 and 8, and at treatment discontinuation. EORTC QLQ-C30 included five functional domains, nine symptom scales, and one global health status/QoL scale.

QoL data completion declined from 93% at screening to 51% at treatment discontinuation during the course of the study, and higher non-compliance rates were seen among IC patients. QoL was maintained (no worsening greater than 10 points) with REVLIMID from baseline through last treatment cycle for evaluated primary and secondary QoL domains. Patients treated with REVLIMID reported similar QoL vs. IC single agents across all domain/scale scores and at each follow-up visit.

A trend toward higher rates of clinically meaningful improvement in QoL was observed in REVLIMID-treated patients across most function and symptom domains/scales at one or more follow-up visits. No significant difference in the QoL was observed between the two arms in the primary endpoint of global health status. Statistically significant QoL differences (at least 10%) comparing REVLIMID vs. IC treatment arms were identified for physical function (24% vs. 8%, respectively; P=0.0025) and pain (29% vs. 18%; P=0.0471).

About REVLIMID

In the United States, REVLIMID is approved in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. REVLIMID is also approved in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy in nearly 70 countries, encompassing Europe, the Americas, the Middle East and Asia, and in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients whose disease has progressed after one therapy in Australia and New Zealand.

REVLIMID is also approved in the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand and several Latin American countries, as well as Malaysia and Israel, for transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities and in Europe for the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS associated with an isolated deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality when other therapeutic options are insufficient or inadequate.

In addition, REVLIMID is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) whose disease has relapsed or progressed after two prior therapies, one of which included bortezomib.

U.S. Regulatory Information for REVLIMID

REVLIMID (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone (dex) is indicated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM)

REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities

REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) whose disease has relapsed or progressed after two prior therapies, one of which included bortezomib

REVLIMID is not indicated and not recommended for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) outside of controlled clinical trials

Important Safety Information

WARNING: EMBRYO-FETAL TOXICITY, HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY, and VENOUS and ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLISM

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Do not use REVLIMID during pregnancy. Lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, caused limb abnormalities in a developmental monkey study. Thalidomide is a known human teratogen that causes severe life-threatening human birth defects. If lenalidomide is used during pregnancy, it may cause birth defects or embryo-fetal death. In females of reproductive potential, obtain 2 negative pregnancy tests before starting REVLIMID treatment. Females of reproductive potential must use 2 forms of contraception or continuously abstain from heterosexual sex during and for 4 weeks after REVLIMID treatment. To avoid embryo-fetal exposure to lenalidomide, REVLIMID is only available through a restricted distribution program, the REVLIMID REMS program (formerly known as the "RevAssist"program).

Information about the REVLIMID REMS program is available at www.celgeneriskmanagement.com or by calling the manufacturer’s toll-free number 1-888-423-5436.

Hematologic Toxicity (Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia)

REVLIMID can cause significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Eighty percent of patients with del 5q MDS had to have a dose delay/reduction during the major study. Thirty-four percent of patients had to have a second dose delay/reduction. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 80% of patients enrolled in the study. Patients on therapy for del 5q MDS should have their complete blood counts monitored weekly for the first 8 weeks of therapy and at least monthly thereafter. Patients may require dose interruption and/or reduction. Patients may require use of blood product support and/or growth factors.

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism

REVLIMID has demonstrated a significantly increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), as well as risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with MM who were treated with REVLIMID and dexamethasone therapy. Monitor for and advise patients about signs and symptoms of thromboembolism. Advise patients to seek immediate medical care if they develop symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, or arm or leg swelling. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended and the choice of regimen should be based on an assessment of the patient’s underlying risks.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Pregnancy: REVLIMID can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant female and is contraindicated in females who are pregnant. If this drug is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus

Allergic Reactions: REVLIMID is contraindicated in patients who have demonstrated hypersensitivity (e.g., angioedema, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis) to lenalidomide

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity:

REVLIMID is an analogue of thalidomide, a known human teratogen that causes life-threatening human birth defects or embryo-fetal death. An embryo-fetal development study in monkeys indicates that lenalidomide produced malformations in offspring of female monkeys who received drug during pregnancy, similar to birth defects observed in humans following exposure to thalidomide during pregnancy
Females of Reproductive Potential: Must avoid pregnancy for at least 4 weeks before beginning REVLIMID therapy, during therapy, during dose interruptions and for at least 4 weeks after completing therapy. Must commit either to abstain continuously from heterosexual sexual intercourse or to use two methods of reliable birth control beginning 4 weeks prior to initiating treatment with REVLIMID, during therapy, during dose interruptions and continuing for 4 weeks following discontinuation of REVLIMID. Must obtain 2 negative pregnancy tests prior to initiating therapy

Males: Lenalidomide is present in the semen of patients receiving the drug. Males must always use a latex or synthetic condom during any sexual contact with females of reproductive potential while taking REVLIMID and for up to 28 days after discontinuing REVLIMID, even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy. Male patients taking REVLIMID must not donate sperm

Blood Donation: Patients must not donate blood during treatment with REVLIMID and for 1 month following discontinuation of the drug because the blood might be given to a pregnant female patient whose fetus must not be exposed to REVLIMID

REVLIMID REMS Program

Because of embryo-fetal risk, REVLIMID is available only through a restricted program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) the REVLIMID REMS Program (formerly known as the "RevAssist" Program). Prescribers and pharmacies must be certified with the program and patients must sign an agreement form and comply with the requirements. Further information about the REVLIMID REMS program is available at www.celgeneriskmanagement.com or by telephone at 1-888-423-5436

Hematologic Toxicity: REVLIMID can cause significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. Advise patients to observe for bleeding or bruising, especially with use of concomitant medications that may increase risk of bleeding. MM: Patients taking REVLIMID/dex should have their complete blood counts (CBC) assessed every 7 days for the first 2 cycles, on days 1 and 15 of cycle 3, and every 28 days thereafter. MCL: Patients taking REVLIMID for MCL should have their CBCs monitored weekly for the first cycle (28 days), every 2 weeks during cycles 2-4, and then monthly thereafter. Patients may require dose interruption and/or dose reduction. MDS: See Boxed WARNINGS

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism: Venous thromboembolic events (DVT and PE) and arterial thromboses are increased in patients treated with REVLIMID. A significantly increased risk of DVT (7.4%) and PE (3.7%) occurred in patients with MM after at least one prior therapy, treated with REVLIMID/dex compared to placebo/dex (3.1% and 0.9%) in clinical trials with varying use of anticoagulant therapies. In NDMM study, in which nearly all patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis, DVT (3.6%) and PE (3.8%) were reported in the Rd continuous arm. Myocardial infarction (MI,1.7%) and stroke (CVA,2.3%) are increased in patients with MM after at least 1 prior therapy who were treated with REVLIMID/dex therapy compared with placebo/dex (0.6%, and 0.9%) in clinical trials. In NDMM study, MI (including acute) was reported (2.3%) in the Rd Continuous arm. Frequency of serious adverse reactions of CVA was (0.8%) in the Rd Continuous arm. Patients with known risk factors, including prior thrombosis, may be at greater risk and actions should be taken to try to minimize all modifiable factors (e.g. hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking). In controlled clinical trials that did not use concomitant thromboprophylaxis, 21.5% overall thrombotic events occurred in patients with refractory and relapsed MM who were treated with REVLIMID/dex compared to 8.3% thrombosis in the placebo/dex group. Median time to first thrombosis event was 2.8 months. In NDMM study, which nearly all patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis, overall frequency of thrombotic events was 17.4% in combined Rd continuous and Rd18 arms. Median time to first thrombosis event as 4.37 months. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended and regimen is based on patients underlying risks. ESAs and estrogens may further increase the risk of thrombosis and their use should be based on a benefit-risk decision. See Boxed WARNINGS

Increased Mortality in Patients With CLL: In a clinical trial in the first line treatment of patients with CLL, single agent REVLIMID therapy increased the risk of death as compared to single agent chlorambucil. In an interim analysis, there were 34 deaths among 210 patients on the REVLIMID treatment arm compared to 18 deaths among 211 patients in the chlorambucil treatment arm, and hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.92 [95% CI: 1.08-3.41] consistent with a 92% increase in risk of death. Serious adverse cardiovascular reactions, including atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiac failure occurred more frequently in the REVLIMID treatment arm. REVLIMID is not indicated and not recommended for use in CLL outside of controlled clinical trials

Second Primary Malignancies: In clinical trials in patients with MM receiving REVLIMID, an increase of invasive second primary malignancies notably AML and MDS have been observed. The increase of AML and MDS occurred predominantly in NDMM patients receiving REVLIMID in combination with oral melphalan (5.3%) or immediately following high dose intravenous melphalan and ASCT (up to 5.2%). The frequency of AML and MDS cases in the Revlimid/dex arms was observed to be 0.4%. Cases of B-cell malignancies (including Hodgkin’s Lymphomas) were observed in clinical trials where patients received lenalidomide in the post-ASCT setting. Patients who received REVLIMID-containing therapy until disease progression did not show a higher incidence of invasive SPM than patients treated in the fixed duration REVLIMID-containing arms. Monitor patients for the development of second primary malignancies. Take into account both the potential benefit and risk of second primary malignancies when considering treatment with REVLIMID

Hepatotoxicity: Hepatic failure, including fatal cases, has occurred in patients treated with lenalidomide in combination with dex. The mechanism of drug-induced hepatotoxicity is unknown. Pre-existing viral liver disease, elevated baseline liver enzymes, and concomitant medications may be risk factors. Monitor liver enzymes periodically. Stop REVLIMID upon elevation of liver enzymes. After return to baseline values, treatment at a lower dose may be considered

Allergic Reactions: Angioedema and serious dermatologic reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been reported. These events can be fatal. Patients with a prior history of Grade 4 rash associated with thalidomide treatment should not receive REVLIMID. REVLIMID interruption or discontinuation should be considered for Grade 2-3 skin rash. REVLIMID must be discontinued for angioedema, Grade 4 rash, exfoliative or bullous rash, or if SJS or TEN is suspected and should not be resumed following discontinuation for these reactions. REVLIMID capsules contain lactose. Risk-benefit of REVLIMID treatment should be evaluated in patients with lactose intolerance

Tumor Lysis Syndrome: Fatal instances of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) have been reported during treatment with lenalidomide. The patients at risk of TLS are those with high tumor burden prior to treatment. These patients should be monitored closely and appropriate precautions taken

Tumor Flare Reaction: Tumor flare reaction (TFR) has occurred during investigational use of lenalidomide for CLL and lymphoma, and is characterized by tender lymph node swelling, low grade fever, pain and rash.

Monitoring and evaluation for TFR is recommended in patients with MCL. Tumor flare may mimic the progression of disease (PD). In patients with Grade 3 or 4 TFR, it is recommended to withhold treatment with lenalidomide until TFR resolves to ≤ Grade 1. In the MCL trial, approximately 10% of subjects experienced TFR; all reports were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. All of the events occurred in cycle 1 and one patient developed TFR again in cycle 11. Lenalidomide may be continued in patients with Grade 1 and 2 TFR without interruption or modification, at the physician’s discretion. Patients with Grade 1 or 2 TFR may also be treated with corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or narcotic analgesics for management of TFR symptoms. Patients with Grade 3 or 4 TFR may be treated for management of symptoms per the guidance for treatment of Grade 1 and 2 TFR

Impaired Stem Cell Mobilization: A decrease in the number of CD34+ cells collected after treatment ( > 4 cycles) with REVLIMID has been reported. In patients who are autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) candidates, referral to a transplant center should occur early in treatment to optimize timing of the stem cell collection.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

Multiple Myeloma

In newly diagnosed patients the most frequently reported Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions in Arm Rd Continuous included neutropenia (27.8%), anemia (18.2%), thrombocytopenia (8.3%), pneumonia (11.1%), asthenia (7.7.%), fatigue (7.3%), back pain (7%), hypokalemia (6.6%), rash (7.3%), cataract (5.8%), dyspnea (5.6%), DVT (5.5%), hyperglycemia (5.3%), lymphopenia and leukopenia. The frequency of infections in Arm Rd Continuous was 75%
Adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of NDMM patients in Arm Rd Continuous: diarrhea (45.5%), anemia (43.8%), neutropenia (35%), fatigue (32.5%), back pain (32%), insomnia (27.6%), asthenia (28.2%), rash (26.1%), decreased appetite (23.1%), cough (22.7%), dyspnea (22.0%), pyrexia (21.4%), muscle spasms (20.5%), and abdominal pain (20.5%). The frequency of onset of cataracts increased over time with 0.7% during the first 6 months and up to 9.6% by the second year of treatment with Arm Rd Continuous

After at least one prior therapy most adverse reactions and Grade 3/4 adverse reactions were more frequent in MM patients who received the combination of REVLIMID/dex compared to placebo/dex. Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions included neutropenia 33.4% vs 3.4%, febrile neutropenia 2.3% vs 0%, DVT 8.2% vs 3.4% and PE 4% vs 0.9% respectively
Adverse reactions reported in ≥15% of MM patients (REVLIMID/dex vs dex/placebo): fatigue (44% vs 42%), neutropenia (42% vs 6%), constipation (41% vs 21%), diarrhea (39% vs 27%), muscle cramp (33% vs 21%), anemia (31% vs 24%), pyrexia (28% vs 23%), peripheral edema (26% vs 21%), nausea (26% vs 21%), back pain (26% vs 19%), upper respiratory tract infection (25% vs 16%), dyspnea (24% vs 17%), dizziness (23% vs 17%), thrombocytopenia (22% vs 11%), rash (21% vs 9%), tremor (21% vs 7%), weight decreased (20% vs 15%), nasopharyngitis (18% vs 9%), blurred vision (17% vs 11%), anorexia (16% vs 10%), and dysgeusia (15% vs 10%)

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in ≥ 5% of patients with del 5q MDS were neutropenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (50%), pneumonia (7%), rash (7%), anemia (6%), leukopenia (5%), fatigue (5%), dyspnea (5%), and back pain (5%)
Adverse events reported in ≥15% of del 5q MDS patients (REVLIMID): thrombocytopenia (61.5%), neutropenia (58.8%), diarrhea (49%), pruritus (42%), rash (36%), fatigue (31%), constipation (24%), nausea (24%), nasopharyngitis (23%), arthralgia (22%), pyrexia (21%), back pain (21%), peripheral edema (20%), cough (20%), dizziness (20%), headache (20%), muscle cramp (18%), dyspnea (17%), pharyngitis (16%), epistaxis (15%), asthenia (15%), upper respiratory tract infection (15%)

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in ≥5% of patients treated with REVLIMID in the MCL trial (N=134) included neutropenia (43%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (11%), pneumonia (9%), leukopenia (7%), fatigue (7%), diarrhea (6%), dyspnea (6%), and febrile neutropenia (6%)
Serious adverse events reported in ≥2 patients treated with REVLIMID monotherapy for MCL included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clostridium difficile colitis, sepsis, basal cell carcinoma, and supraventricular tachycardia
Adverse events reported in ≥15% of patients treated with REVLIMID in the MCL trial included neutropenia (49%), thrombocytopenia (36%), fatigue (34%), anemia (31%), diarrhea (31%), nausea (30%), cough (28%), pyrexia (23%), rash (22%), dyspnea (18%), pruritus (17%), peripheral edema (16%), constipation (16%), and leukopenia (15%)

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Periodic monitoring of digoxin plasma levels, in accordance with clinical judgment and based on standard clinical practice in patients receiving this medication, is recommended during administration of REVLIMID. It is not known whether there is an interaction between dex and warfarin. Close monitoring of PT and INR is recommended in MM patients taking concomitant warfarin. Erythropoietic agents, or other agents, that may increase the risk of thrombosis, such as estrogen containing therapies, should be used with caution after making a benefit-risk assessment in patients receiving REVLIMID

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy: If pregnancy does occur during treatment, immediately discontinue the drug. Under these conditions, refer patient to an obstetrician/gynecologist experienced in reproductive toxicity for further evaluation and counseling. Any suspected fetal exposure to REVLIMID must be reported to the FDA via the MedWatch program at 1-800-332-1088 and also to Celgene Corporation at 1-888-423-5436

Nursing Mothers: It is not known whether REVLIMID is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for adverse reactions in nursing infants, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother

Pediatric Use: Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 have not been established

Renal Impairment: Since REVLIMID is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney, adjustments to the starting dose of REVLIMID are recommended to provide appropriate drug exposure in patients with moderate (CLcr 30-60 mL/min) or severe renal impairment (CLcr < 30 mL/min) and in patients on dialysis