MEI Pharma Reports Updated Results from Phase II Study of Pracinostat and Azacitidine in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

On June 12, 2015 MEI Pharma reported updated results from a Phase II study of its investigational drug candidate Pracinostat in combination with azacitidine (marketed as Vidaza) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Press release, MEI Pharma, JUN 12, 2015, View Source [SID:1234505410]). Data from 50 patients treated at 15 centers are being presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) Annual Congress in Vienna. A copy of the poster, entitled "Updated Results from a Phase 2 Study of Pracinostat in Combination with Azacitidine in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia," is now available at www.meipharma.com.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

To date, 27 of 50 patients (54%) have achieved the primary endpoint of complete response (CR) plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) plus morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), including 16 patients (32%) who achieved a CR. The response rate from this study compares favorably with previous studies of azacitidine alone in this population1. Most responses occur within the first two cycles and continue to improve with ongoing therapy.

Median overall survival has not yet been reached in the study, with 32 patients (64%) still being followed (range, 6-15 months). Survival of patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetic abnormalities appears greater than that for patients with high-risk cytogenetics, though neither subset of patients has reached median survival. The 60-day mortality rate, often used as a benchmark in AML clinical studies, was 10% (5 of 50).

Pracinostat in combination with azacitidine was well tolerated in this population of elderly AML patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) included febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and fatigue. AEs resulting in dose reductions were frequently due to disease under study. Nearly half of the patients (22 of 50) to date have received study drug beyond six months, reflecting long-term tolerability.

"The combination of Pracinostat and azacitidine continues to demonstrate compelling clinical activity in these elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML," said Daniel P. Gold, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of MEI Pharma. "While the overall survival trend in this study is encouraging, we believe that longer follow-up is needed to gain an accurate survival estimate. Ultimately, this survival estimate will be critical in determining the development path forward for this combination. We look forward to providing an update when these data mature, which we expect to occur later this year."

About Pracinostat

Pracinostat is an orally available inhibitor of a group of enzymes called histone deacetylases, or HDACs. HDACs belong to a larger set of proteins collectively known as epigenetic regulators that can alter gene expression by chemically modifying DNA or its associated chromosomal proteins. Abnormal activity of these regulators is believed to play an important role in cancer and other diseases. Pracinostat has been tested in multiple Phase I and Phase II clinical studies in advanced hematologic diseases and solid tumor indications with side effects often associated with drugs of this class, the most frequent of which is fatigue. The results of these studies also suggest that Pracinostat has potential best-in-class pharmacokinetic properties when compared to other oral HDAC inhibitors.

MEI Pharma owns exclusive worldwide rights to Pracinostat.

About AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (also known as acute myelogenous leukemia) is the most common acute leukemia affecting adults, and its incidence is expected to increase as the population ages. The American Cancer Society estimates about 20,830 new cases of AML per year in the U.S., with an average age of about 67 years. Treatment options for AML remain virtually unchanged over the past 30 years. Front line treatment consists primarily of chemotherapy, while the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology recommend azacitidine or decitabine (marketed as Dacogen) as low intensity treatment options for AML patients over the age of 60 who are unsuitable for induction chemotherapy.

Sunesis Pharmaceuticals Presents New Data From VALOR Evaluating Vosaroxin in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia at the 20th Congress of the European Hematology Association

On June 12, 2015 Sunesis reported additional results of the VALOR trial, a Phase 3 study of vosaroxin and cytarabine in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Press release, Sunesis, JUN 12, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2058835 [SID:1234505411]). The results are being presented today, Friday, June 12th from 5:15 p.m. to 6:45 p.m. Central European Time at the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poster session of the 20th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) taking place in Vienna, Austria.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

VALOR is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial which enrolled 711 adult patients with first relapsed or refractory AML at 124 leading sites in 15 countries. Patients were stratified for age, geographic region and disease status and randomized one to one to receive either vosaroxin and cytarabine or placebo and cytarabine. Detailed results of the VALOR trial were presented in the "Late Breaking Abstracts" session of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in December 2014. Data from the post-hoc analysis of VALOR patients age 60 years and older who received allogeneic transplant after treatment with vosaroxin or placebo plus cytarabine were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in May 2015 and now at the EHA (Free EHA Whitepaper) Congress.

Among the new data presented today are detailed results from the subgroups of patients age 60 years and older (451 out of 711 enrolled in VALOR) with late relapse (n=87) and refractory and early relapse disease (combined n=364).

Among patients with late relapse disease, overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were comparable between treatment arms. The complete remission (CR) rate was 57% and 28% (p=0.0064) and event-free survival (EFS) was 5.5 months versus 2.3 months (HR=0.65, p=0.0852) for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively. Thirty- and 60-day all-cause mortality among these patients was 11% and 18% versus 2% and 14% for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively.

Among patients with refractory and early relapse disease (combined n=364), a population known to have poorer outcomes, OS was 6.5 months versus 3.9 months for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively (HR=0.69, p=0.0008). CR rates in this population were 26% and 10% (p=0.0001) for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively. Among these patients, LFS was 9.7 months versus 5.5 months (HR=0.50, p=0.0424) and EFS was 1.7 months versus 1.3 months (HR=0.59, p<0.0001) for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively. Thirty- and 60-day all-cause mortality among these patients was comparable, at 10% and 21% versus 11% and 25% for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively.

In all patients age 60 years and older, Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events that were more common in the vosaroxin combination arm were gastrointestinal and myelosuppression-related toxicities, consistent with those observed in previous company trials. The rate of serious adverse events related to treatment was 74% and 60% for vosaroxin/cytarabine and placebo/cytarabine, respectively.

"AML is a disease that primarily affects older patients, and clinical outcomes among these patients is abysmal," said Farhad Ravandi, M.D., Professor of Medicine, Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and a principal investigator of the VALOR study. "These patients have had few options outside of clinical trial enrollment. Results from the analyses presented today show compelling survival and durable responses with comparable early mortality for the vosaroxin and cytarabine treatment arm in the older refractory and early relapse patients. Given these results, I believe vosaroxin represents an important new treatment option."

"In over four decades of research, there has been far too little progress in the treatment of AML," said Patricia J. Goldsmith, CEO of CancerCare. "This need is particularly pronounced in those patients age 60 and older with the fewest options. Progress for these patients cannot wait."

The two poster presentations (Abstracts #4192 and #4693, Hall C), titled "Improved survival in patients ≥60 with first relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated with vosaroxin plus cytarabine vs placebo plus cytarabine: results from the Phase 3 VALOR study" and "Allogeneic transplant in patients ≥60 years of age with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after treatment with vosaroxin or placebo plus cytarabine: results from VALOR," will be available on the Sunesis website at www.sunesis.com. In addition, an E-poster, titled "Impact of cytogenetics on clinical outcomes in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated with vosaroxin plus cytarabine: results from VALOR," is on display at EHA (Free EHA Whitepaper) through tomorrow, Saturday, June 13th at 6:45 p.m. Central European Time.

ARIAD Announces Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Data of Ponatinib from Phase 2 Pace Clinical Trial

On June 12, 2015 ARIAD reported long-term follow up from its pivotal Phase 2 trial of Iclusig (ponatinib), its approved BCR-ABL inhibitor, in heavily pretreated patients with resistant or intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) (Press release, Ariad, JUN 12, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2058920 [SID:1234505422]). The study now shows that with a median follow-up of approximately 3.5 years for chronic phase CML (CP-CML) patients and a median follow-up of approximately 2.9 years in all patients in the trial, Iclusig continues to demonstrate anti-leukemic activity in patients with limited treatment options. Responses have been maintained long-term in CP-CML patients. Eighty-three percent (83%) of CP-CML patients who achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) are estimated to remain in MCyR at three years.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Additionally, 95 percent of CP-CML patients who underwent ponatinib dose reductions maintained their responses (MCyR). Benefit-risk evaluations should guide the decision to initiate and maintain Iclusig therapy, particularly in patients who may be at increased risk for arterial occlusive events (AOE).

"These continued responses in the PACE study, with a minimum follow-up of 3.3 years, in such a heavily pretreated patient population are very encouraging. Eighty-three percent of CP-CML patients who achieved the primary endpoint of major cytogenetic response remain in MCyR at three years," stated Jorge E. Cortes, M.D., Professor and Deputy Chair, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. "Careful assessment of the benefit and risk of initiating ponatinib therapy, particularly in patients who may be at increased risk for arterial occlusive events, can help identify patients with refractory Ph+ leukemias who can benefit most from this treatment."

The data were featured today at the 20th Conference of the European Hematology Association (EHA) (Free EHA Whitepaper) in Vienna, Austria.

PACE Trial Update

The efficacy and safety of ponatinib in CML and Ph+ ALL patients resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or with the T315I mutation, were evaluated in the pivotal Phase 2 PACE trial. A total of 449 patients were treated with ponatinib at a starting dose of 45 mg/day. Ninety-three percent of patients had previously received two or more approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and 55 percent had previously received three or more approved TKIs.

Updated data on CP-CML patients (n=270) from the ongoing trial indicate that with a median follow-up of 42.3 months (data as of February 2, 2015), 114 patients (42%) continue to receive ponatinib.

Additional data in CP-CML patients include:

59% of CP-CML patients achieved MCyR (primary endpoint) at any time.

83% of patients who achieved MCyR are estimated to remain in MCyR at 3 years.

39% of patients achieved a major molecular response (MMR) or better.

By Kaplan-Meier analysis, progression-free survival at 3 years is estimated to be 60%.

Overall survival at 3 years is estimated to be 81%.

23% of CP-CML patients experienced an AOE designated a serious adverse event (SAE), and 28 percent of CP-CML patients experienced any AOE. The median time to onset for AOEs in CP-CML patients was 14.1 (0.3–44.0) months.

4% and 5% of CP-CML patients, respectively experienced a venous thromboembolic SAE or AE.

The most common all-grade treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 40% of CP-CML patients were abdominal pain (46%), rash (46%), thrombocytopenia (45%), headache (43%), constipation (41%), and dry skin (41%); the discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 18% in CP-CML.

"These data show that the majority of CP-CML patients in the PACE trial retained their anti-leukemic responses, even when lowering the daily dose of Iclusig," stated Frank G. Haluska, M.D., Ph.D., senior vice president of clinical research and development and chief medical officer at ARIAD. "The safety and efficacy of Iclusig at starting doses lower than 45 mg will be studied in the randomized OPTIC (Optimizing Ponatinib Treatment In CML) trial set to begin shortly."

Efficacy Update Following Prospective Dose-Reduction Recommendations
(Data from October 10, 2013 to February 2, 2015)

On October 10, 2013, dose-reduction recommendations were provided by ARIAD to investigators for patients remaining on the PACE trial. The following dose reductions were recommended, unless the benefit-risk analysis warranted treatment with a higher dose:

CP-CML patients who already achieved a MCyR should have their ponatinib dose reduced to 15 mg/day,
CP-CML patients who had not already achieved MCyR should have their dose reduced to 30 mg/day, and
Advanced-phase patients should have their dose reduced to 30 mg/day.

As of February 2015, with 1.3 years (16 months) of follow-up after these recommendations, the rate of maintenance of response in CP-CML was 95% — whether or not patients underwent prospective dose reductions.

Of the 64 patients who were in MCyR as of October 10, 2013 and had a prospective dose reduction, 61 patients (95%) maintained their response at 1.3 years following prospective dose reduction.

Of the 47 patients who were in MMR as of October 10, 2013 and had a prospective dose reduction, 44 patients (94%) maintained their response at 1.3 years following prospective dose reduction.

42 patients in MCyR did not undergo any dose reductions (the majority of which were already at a reduced dose of 30 mg or 15 mg as of October 10, 2013); of these, 39 patients (93%) maintained MCyR after 1.3 more years of ponatinib treatment.

Safety Update Following Prospective Dose-Reduction

Recommendations (Data from October 10, 2013 to February 2, 2015)

Of the patients who underwent prospective dose reduction, 5 of 71 patients (7%) without prior AOEs had a new AOE during the 1.3 year interval following prospective dose reduction.

Of the patients who did not undergo prospective dose reduction, 9 of 67 patients (13%) without prior AOE had a new AOE in the same time interval.

About Iclusig (ponatinib) tablets

Iclusig is approved in the U.S., EU, Australia, Israel, Canada and Switzerland.

In the U.S., Iclusig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the:

Treatment of adult patients with T315I-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase) or T315I-positive Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL).

Treatment of adult patients with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph+ ALL for whom no other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is indicated.

These indications are based upon response rate. There are no trials verifying an improvement in disease-related symptoms or increased survival with Iclusig.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE BOXED WARNING

WARNING: VASCULAR OCCLUSION, HEART FAILURE, and HEPATOTOXICITY

See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning

Vascular Occlusion: Arterial and venous thrombosis and occlusions have occurred in at least 27% of Iclusig treated patients, including fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, stenosis of large arterial vessels of the brain, severe peripheral vascular disease, and the need for urgent revascularization procedures. Patients with and without cardiovascular risk factors, including patients less than 50 years old, experienced these events. Monitor for evidence of thromboembolism and vascular occlusion. Interrupt or stop Iclusig immediately for vascular occlusion. A benefit risk consideration should guide a decision to restart Iclusig therapy.

Heart Failure, including fatalities, occurred in 8% of Iclusig-treated patients. Monitor cardiac function. Interrupt or stop Iclusig for new or worsening heart failure.

Hepatotoxicity, liver failure and death have occurred in Iclusig-treated patients. Monitor hepatic function. Interrupt Iclusig if hepatotoxicity is suspected.

Vascular Occlusion: Arterial and venous thrombosis and occlusions, including fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, stenosis of large arterial vessels of the brain, severe peripheral vascular disease, and the need for urgent revascularization procedures have occurred in at least 27% of Iclusig-treated patients from the phase 1 and phase 2 trials. Iclusig can also cause recurrent or multi-site vascular occlusion. Overall, 20% of Iclusig-treated patients experienced an arterial occlusion and thrombosis event of any grade. Fatal and life-threatening vascular occlusion has occurred within 2 weeks of starting Iclusig treatment and in patients treated with average daily dose intensities as low as 15 mg per day. The median time to onset of the first vascular occlusion event was 5 months. Patients with and without cardiovascular risk factors have experienced vascular occlusion although these events were more frequent with increasing age and in patients with prior history of ischemia, hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia. Interrupt or stop Iclusig immediately in patients who develop vascular occlusion events.

Heart Failure: Fatal and serious heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction occurred in 5% of Iclusig-treated patients (22/449). Eight percent of patients (35/449) experienced any grade of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction. Monitor patients for signs or symptoms consistent with heart failure and treat as clinically indicated, including interruption of Iclusig. Consider discontinuation of Iclusig in patients who develop serious heart failure.

Hepatotoxicity: Iclusig can cause hepatotoxicity, including liver failure and death. Fulminant hepatic failure leading to death occurred in an Iclusig-treated patient within one week of starting Iclusig. Two additional fatal cases of acute liver failure also occurred. The fatal cases occurred in patients with blast phase CML (BP-CML) or Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Severe hepatotoxicity occurred in all disease cohorts. Iclusig treatment may result in elevation in ALT, AST, or both. Monitor liver function tests at baseline, then at least monthly or as clinically indicated. Interrupt, reduce or discontinue Iclusig as clinically indicated.

Hypertension: Treatment-emergent hypertension (defined as systolic BP≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg on at least one occasion) occurred in 67% of patients (300/449). Eight patients treated with Iclusig (2%) experienced treatment-emergent symptomatic hypertension as a serious adverse reaction, including one patient (<1%) with hypertensive crisis. Patients may require urgent clinical intervention for hypertension associated with confusion, headache, chest pain, or shortness of breath. In 131 patients with Stage 1 hypertension at baseline, 61% (80/131) developed Stage 2 hypertension. Monitor and manage blood pressure elevations during Iclusig use and treat hypertension to normalize blood pressure. Interrupt, dose reduce, or stop Iclusig if hypertension is not medically controlled.

Pancreatitis: Clinical pancreatitis occurred in 6% (28/449) of patients (5% Grade 3) treated with Iclusig. Pancreatitis resulted in discontinuation or treatment interruption in 6% of patients (25/449). The incidence of treatment-emergent lipase elevation was 41%. Check serum lipase every 2 weeks for the first 2 months and then monthly thereafter or as clinically indicated. Consider additional serum lipase monitoring in patients with a history of pancreatitis or alcohol abuse. Dose interruption or reduction may be required. In cases where lipase elevations are accompanied by abdominal symptoms, interrupt treatment with Iclusig and evaluate patients for pancreatitis. Do not consider restarting Iclusig until patients have complete resolution of symptoms and lipase levels are less than 1.5 x ULN.

Neuropathy: Peripheral and cranial neuropathy have occurred in Iclusig-treated patients. Overall, 13% (59/449) of Iclusig-treated patients experienced a peripheral neuropathy event of any grade (2%, grade 3/4). In clinical trials, the most common peripheral neuropathies reported were peripheral neuropathy (4%, 18/449), paresthesia (4%, 17/449), hypoesthesia (2%, 11/449), and hyperesthesia (1%, 5/449). Cranial neuropathy developed in 1% (6/449) of Iclusig-treated patients (<1% grade 3/4). Of the patients who developed neuropathy, 31% (20/65) developed neuropathy during the first month of treatment. Monitor patients for symptoms of neuropathy, such as hypoesthesia, hyperesthesia, paresthesia, discomfort, a burning sensation, neuropathic pain or weakness. Consider interrupting Iclusig and evaluate if neuropathy is suspected.

Ocular Toxicity: Serious ocular toxicities leading to blindness or blurred vision have occurred in Iclusig-treated patients. Retinal toxicities including macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, and retinal hemorrhage occurred in 3% of Iclusig-treated patients. Conjunctival or corneal irritation, dry eye, or eye pain occurred in 13% of patients. Visual blurring occurred in 6% of the patients. Other ocular toxicities include cataracts, glaucoma, iritis, iridocyclitis, and ulcerative keratitis. Conduct comprehensive eye exams at baseline and periodically during treatment.

Hemorrhage: Serious bleeding events, including fatalities, occurred in 5% (22/449) of patients treated with Iclusig. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 24% of patients. The incidence of serious bleeding events was higher in patients with accelerated phase CML (AP-CML), BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL. Most hemorrhagic events, but not all occurred in patients with grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Interrupt Iclusig for serious or severe hemorrhage and evaluate.

Fluid Retention: Serious fluid retention events occurred in 3% (13/449) of patients treated with Iclusig. One instance of brain edema was fatal. In total, fluid retention occurred in 23% of the patients. The most common fluid retention events were peripheral edema (16%), pleural effusion (7%), and pericardial effusion (3%). Monitor patients for fluid retention and manage patients as clinically indicated. Interrupt, reduce, or discontinue Iclusig as clinically indicated.

Cardiac Arrhythmias: Symptomatic bradyarrhythmias that led to a requirement for pacemaker implantation occurred in 1% (3/449) of Iclusig-treated patients. Advise patients to report signs and symptoms suggestive of slow heart rate (fainting, dizziness, or chest pain). Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 5% (25/449) of Iclusig-treated patients. Atrial fibrillation was the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia and occurred in 20 patients. For 13 patients, the event led to hospitalization. Advise patients to report signs and symptoms of rapid heart rate (palpitations, dizziness). Interrupt Iclusig and evaluate.

Myelosuppression: Severe (grade 3 or 4) myelosuppression occurred in 48% (215/449) of patients treated with Iclusig. The incidence of these events was greater in patients with AP-CML, BP-CML and Ph+ ALL than in patients with CP-CML. Obtain complete blood counts every 2 weeks for the first 3 months and then monthly or as clinically indicated, and adjust the dose as recommended.

Tumor Lysis Syndrome: Two patients (<1%) with advanced disease (AP-CML, BP-CML, or Ph+ ALL) treated with Iclusig developed serious tumor lysis syndrome. Hyperuricemia occurred in 7% (30/449) of patients overall; the majority had CP-CML (19 patients). Due to the potential for tumor lysis syndrome in patients with advanced disease, ensure adequate hydration and treat high uric acid levels prior to initiating therapy with Iclusig.

Compromised Wound Healing and Gastrointestinal Perforation: Since Iclusig may compromise wound healing, interrupt Iclusig for at least 1 week prior to major surgery. Serious gastrointestinal perforation (fistula) occurred in one patient 38 days post-cholecystectomy.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Iclusig can cause fetal harm. If Iclusig is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking Iclusig, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus. Advise women to avoid pregnancy while taking Iclusig.

Most common non-hematologic adverse reactions: (≥20%) were hypertension, rash, abdominal pain, fatigue, headache, dry skin, constipation, arthralgia, nausea, and pyrexia. Hematologic adverse reactions included thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and leukopenia.

AVEO Announces FDA Update for Tivozanib in Colorectal Cancer

On June 11, 2015 AVEO Oncology reported that it has received written feedback from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding a potential pivotal study for tivozanib in the treatment of NRP-1 low colorectal cancer (CRC) (Press release, AVEO, JUN 11, 2015, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2058718 [SID:1234505395]). Tivozanib is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with a long half-life and activity against all three VEGF receptors.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

AVEO recently presented results from the BATON-CRC study, a 265 patient randomized trial exploring the combination of mFOLFOX6 and tivozanib or bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced metastatic CRC, at the 2015 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) (Free AACR Whitepaper) Tumor Angiogenesis and Vascular Normalization Conference. Among the predefined biomarkers explored in this study, neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), a signaling protein known to bind to VEGF-A in serum, was found to be a potential prognostic marker for angiogenesis inhibitor activity and may be predictive of tivozanib activity relative to bevacizumab.

Results from this study and the Company’s ongoing assay development efforts were presented to the FDA. Updated analyses from the Company’s assay development efforts, which are similar to those presented at the AACR (Free AACR Whitepaper) conference, will be presented at the upcoming European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 17th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer taking place July 1-4, 2015 in Barcelona Spain.

In response to questions from AVEO regarding a proposed pivotal phase 3 trial of tivozanib in CRC, the FDA suggested that the Company continue work on the development of its biomarker assay to address variability between assays presented, and that, at present, "insufficient data exists to determine the appropriateness of this [NRP-1 low] subgroup" for the proposed phase 3 study. This feedback is consistent with the Company’s current clinical strategy and discussions with cancer research cooperative groups. As such, AVEO plans to evaluate options to confirm the activity of tivozanib and FOLFOX in NRP-1 low CRC through a prospectively defined, randomized Phase 2 study, while continuing to work on the development of a commercially viable assay.

"NRP-1 expression is a biomarker of growing interest for malignancies treated with angiogenesis inhibitors," said Michael Bailey, president and chief executive officer of AVEO. "As part of our effort to develop a commercial companion diagnostic, we continue to evaluate alternative NRP-1 assays. Feedback from the FDA reinforces the importance of these ongoing efforts prior to embarking on a pivotal trial. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Agency and cooperative groups toward the design and potential conduct of an appropriate confirmatory study and the development of a companion diagnostic."

8-K – Current report

On June 11, 2015, Cellectar Biosciences reported that, after review of the company’s investigational new drug (IND) application, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that Cellectar’s tumor margin illumination agent, CLR1502, will be evaluated as a combination product and assigned to the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Filing, 8-K, Cellectar Biosciences, JUN 11, 2015, View Source [SID:1234505396]). As a result of this classification, the FDA has advised Cellectar that it will need to submit a new investigational application for the combination product prior to initiating its planned proof-of-concept trial in breast cancer surgery.

"Our tumor illumination agent shares similar spectral qualities with indocyanine green (ICG), a fluorescent dye commonly used in medical diagnostics, and can therefore use several commercially available fluorescent imaging devices. Current labeling for such devices is limited to FDA approved applications such as cardiac, circulatory, hepatic and ophthalmic conditions," said Dr. Simon Pedder, president and chief executive officer of Cellectar Biosciences. "Because of the groundbreaking nature of our overall technology and the potential for an agent like CLR1502 to dramatically expand the utility of such imaging devices, we appreciate the agency’s perspective and current interest in evaluating CLR1502 in combination with a light source technology. As previously disclosed, in the course of our discussions FDA regarding the CLR1502 registration program, the FDA has stressed that a combination product designation is not binding, can be revised later in our development program, and that we are not necessarily precluded from filing a standalone NDA in the future."

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

About CLR1502

CLR1502 is a small-molecule, broad-spectrum, cancer-targeted, non-radioactive optical imaging agent developed by Cellectar to be the first of its kind for broad spectrum intraoperative tumor margin illumination and non-invasive tumor imaging. CLR1502 is comprised of a proprietary phospholipid ether (PLE) analog, acting as a cancer-targeted delivery and retention vehicle attached to a fluorophore to enable real-time visualization of malignant tissue under near-infrared light.

CLR1502 is being developed for intraoperative imaging of cancer that will aid in the identification of malignant tissue during diagnostic, staging, debulking and curative cancer surgeries. In particular, the potential of CLR1502 in tumor margin illumination during oncologic resections raises the possibility that this operative aid may improve surgical outcomes.