U.S. FDA Approves PADCEV® plus Keytruda® as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Regardless of Cisplatin Eligibility

On July 13, 2026 Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and Astellas Pharma Inc. (TSE: 4503, President and CEO: Naoki Okamura, "Astellas") reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv), a Nectin-4 directed antibody-drug conjugate, plus the PD-1 inhibitor, Keytruda (pembrolizumab) or Keytruda QLEX (pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph) as neoadjuvant and adjuvant (before and after surgery) treatment for adult patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer regardless of cisplatin eligibilityi. This now marks the first platinum-free regimen approved for adult patients with MIBC, regardless of cisplatin eligibility.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The approval was based on results from the pivotal Phase 3 EV-304 clinical trial (also known as KEYNOTE-B15), which were presented at the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium (ASCO GU). This expanded indication builds on the November 2025 U.S. FDA approval of the combination for use as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible adult patients with MIBC, based on results from the EV-303 Phase 3 clinical trial (also known as KEYNOTE-905) that were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Christopher Hoimes, DO, Director of the Bladder Cancer Program and Center for Cancer Immunotherapy at Duke Cancer Institute, and an EV-304 Principal Investigator
"For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, a comprehensive treatment approach is important; the neoadjuvant phase can help shrink the tumor and target undetectable cancer cells early before surgery, while the adjuvant phase can be critical in eliminating residual, undetectable cancer cells following surgery. These data from EV-304 and this approval show that by delivering this regimen across both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases, without platinum-based chemotherapy, we can significantly reduce the risk of recurrence and improve overall survival — offering a potential new standard of care for adult patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer."

Aamir Malik, Executive Vice President, Chief U.S. Commercial Officer, Pfizer
"Today’s approval marks a historic turning point for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, providing adult patients with the first approved platinum-free combination regimen shown to significantly improve survival over the current standard of care – regardless of cisplatin-eligibility. PADCEV plus pembrolizumab has established itself as the standard of care for first line therapy of advanced stages of bladder cancer, and we’re thrilled to be able to provide this community a much-needed new treatment option in an earlier, potentially curative-intent setting."

Moitreyee Chatterjee-Kishore, PhD, MBA, Head of Oncology Development, Astellas
"The approval of neoadjuvant and adjuvant PADCEV plus pembrolizumab expands the established impact of this combination and represents a critical leap forward in how muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be treated. By delivering a clinically meaningful survival benefit, with profound event-free survival and pathological complete response rates, this regimen is the first platinum-free treatment option in nearly 25 years to outperform standard of care chemotherapy, offering new hope to patients living with this disease."

In the EV-304 clinical trial, patients were randomized to receive surgery with neoadjuvant and adjuvant PADCEV plus pembrolizumab or surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PADCEV plus pembrolizumab was administered as a planned total of 9 cycles of PADCEV and 17 cycles of pembrolizumab split before and after surgery.ii PADCEV plus pembrolizumab demonstrated:

A 47% reduction in the risk of tumor recurrence, progression or death compared to patients treated with standard of care neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.53; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.41–0.70; 1-sided p<0.0001).ii
An estimated 79.4% of patients were event-free at two years, compared with 66.2% treated with standard of care.ii
A 35% reduction in the risk of death compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR of 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; 1-sided p=0.0029).ii
A pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 55.8% compared with 32.5% with chemotherapy at the time of surgery (estimated difference 23.4%; 95% CI 16.7-29.8; 1-sided p<0.0001).ii
A safety profile consistent with prior experience with this combination, and no new identifiable safety signals. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) due to any cause occurred in 75.7% of patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant PADCEV plus pembrolizumab compared to 67.2% of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.ii
About the EV-304/KEYNOTE-B15 Trial
The EV-304 trial is an ongoing, open-label, randomized, controlled, Phase 3 study evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) in patients with MIBC who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either neoadjuvant and adjuvant (before and after surgery) enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab (arm A) or neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy (arm B). Curative-intent surgery (cystectomy) was performed in both arms. Enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab was administered as a planned total of 9 cycles of enfortumab vedotin and 17 cycles of pembrolizumab split before and after surgery.ii

The primary endpoint of this trial is EFS, defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes radical cystectomy (RC) or failure to undergo RC in participants with residual disease, gross residual disease left behind at the time of surgery, local or distant recurrence based on blinded independent central review (BICR) or death due to any cause. Key secondary endpoints include OS and pCR rate.iii

For more information on the global EV-304 trial, go to clinicaltrials.gov.

About Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, diagnosed in more than 614,000 people each year globally, including an estimated 85,000 people in the U.S.iii,iv MIBC represents approximately 30% of all bladder cancer cases.v The standard treatment for patients with MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery.vi Even after undergoing surgery to have their bladder removed, approximately half of patients with MIBC experience disease recurrence.vii

About PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv)
PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that is directed against Nectin-4, a protein located on the surface of cells and highly expressed in bladder cancer.viii Nonclinical data suggest the anticancer activity of PADCEV is due to its binding to Nectin-4-expressing cells, followed by the internalization and release of the anti-tumor agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) into the cell, which result in the cell not reproducing (cell cycle arrest) and in programmed cell death (apoptosis).i

PADCEV plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph is approved for the treatment of adult patients with MIBC in the United States and for cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC in the European Union.

PADCEV plus pembrolizumab is also approved for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) in the United States, the European Union, Japan and a number of other countries around the world. PADCEV is also approved as a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with la/mUC who have previously received a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and platinum-containing chemotherapy or are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and have previously received one or more prior lines of therapy.

(Press release, Astellas, JUL 13, 2026, View Source [SID1234670182])

A New Approach to Treating Brain Cancer: HDT Bio Launches Canadian Clinical Program at McGill University

On July 12, 2026 HDT Bio Corp. reported the establishment of HDT Bio Canada Inc., its Canadian subsidiary, formed to advance its cancer immunotherapy programs through Canadian clinical development, Canadian manufacturing, and Canadian regulatory pathways. The company has partnered with McGill University and The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital) for the clinical development of HDT-401, its investigational locally administered immune activator for glioblastoma.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

HDT-401 has already been administered to glioblastoma patients under compassionate use protocols. The results were encouraging enough to inform and shape the design of a formal Phase 1 clinical trial. HDT Bio Canada has completed a pre-Clinical Trial Application meeting with Health Canada, a required regulatory step on the path to trial initiation and has received constructive feedback that advances the program toward CTA submission.

The planned Phase 1 study will be conducted in collaboration with Roberto Diaz, MD, PhD of The Neuro of McGill University at, along with clinical and scientific experts across McGill-affiliated institutions in Montreal. "When you operate on these patients, you understand the problem in a way that is difficult to convey. You resect what you can. You know what remains. And you know the current tools are not enough," said Dr. Diaz. "This program is about changing that."

HDT-401 combines Riboxxim, a precisely engineered molecule licensed from Riboxx GmbH of Dresden, Germany, with HDT Bio’s proprietary LION nucleic acid delivery platform. The LION platform has been evaluated in more than 6,000 patients across multiple clinical programs, providing an extensive foundation of clinical experience.

"Glioblastoma patients have waited decades for something new," said Steven Reed, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of HDT Bio Corp. "We have treated patients with HDT-401 under compassionate use. What we observed was encouraging. That is why we are moving as fast as we can to get this into a formal trial in Canada, with one of the world’s great brain cancer research teams. Our commitment to Canada is significant. We are developing products here, working through Canadian regulatory pathways, and supporting Canadian manufacturing capability. Canadian patients and Canadian science are at the center of this program."

HDT-401 is designed to activate innate immune sensing directly within the tumor bed, converting the glioblastoma microenvironment from immune-suppressed to immune-engaged. The approach is intended to induce inflammatory cytokines, recruit immune effector cells, and support local immune recognition of tumor tissue. Local administration into the tumor or surgical cavity concentrates immune activation at the site of disease while limiting systemic exposure.

"Riboxxim was engineered to solve a problem that earlier TLR3 agonist technologies have never fully addressed: precise, reproducible immune activation without the unpredictability that limited clinical developments and market access. HDT Bio’s approach of delivering Riboxxim is scientifically compelling because it concentrates immune activation exactly where it is needed most," said Prof. Dr. Jacques Rohayem, CEO of Riboxx and the inventor of Riboxxim. "The formulation expertise at HDT Bio has contributed an important step in enabling Riboxxim to become a product that can have a major impact on the treatment of glioblastoma and other cancers. I am pleased to see it advancing to the clinic."

"Glioblastoma remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat because recurrence is common and the tumor environment actively suppresses immune activity," said Roberto Diaz, MD, PhD of McGill University. "These are real patients with no good options. The tumor’s ability to suppress immune activity locally is one of the central reasons it has resisted every treatment we have thrown at it. An approach that targets that immunosuppressive environment directly, at the tumor bed, is where the science points. That is why I am committed to this program."

HDT Bio is also advancing a breast cancer vaccine program in Canada, reflecting the company’s broader commitment to Canadian patients and Canadian clinical infrastructure. For that program, the company has engaged Northern RNA Inc. of Calgary as its Canadian GMP manufacturing partner. Northern RNA is a world-class nucleic acid contract manufacturer.

"This is exactly the kind of program Northern RNA was built to support," said Jared Davis, President and CEO of Northern RNA Inc. "Canadian patients with glioblastoma deserve access to the most innovative treatments being developed anywhere in the world. Manufacturing in Canada, for Canadian patients, with a Canadian clinical partner, is how we help make that happen. We are proud to be part of HDT Bio’s Canadian commitment."

About Glioblastoma Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults. The five-year survival rate is below 5 percent. Standard treatment includes maximal safe surgical resection, radiation therapy, and temozolomide chemotherapy, but recurrence is common and survival remains limited. No approved immunotherapy has demonstrated a survival benefit in glioblastoma to date. Despite its devastating prognosis, glioblastoma receives significantly less research funding than other cancers of comparable lethality, leaving patients with few meaningful treatment advances and an urgent need for innovative clinical approaches. The glioblastoma treatment market exceeds $3 billion annually and is projected to reach $4.46 billion by 2030, underscoring both the scale of the disease burden and the commercial opportunity for effective new therapies.

About HDT-401 HDT-401 is an investigational immune activator designed for local administration into the tumor or surgical cavity. It combines Riboxxim, a precisely engineered TLR3/RIG-I agonist licensed from Riboxx GmbH, with HDT Bio’s proprietary LION lipid delivery platform. HDT-401 is intended to stimulate innate immune pathways, promote inflammatory signaling in the tumor microenvironment, and recruit immune cells to support anti-tumor activity. HDT-401 has not been approved by Health Canada, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or any other regulatory authority.

(Press release, HDT Bio, JUL 12, 2026, View Source [SID1234669161])

AB Science provides an update on its clinical program, suspending some non-priority clinical trials to focus on two clinical programs

On July 10, 2026 AB Science SA (Euronext – FR0010557264 – AB) reported an update on its clinical development program and announces the discontinuation of certain non-priority clinical studies in order to focus on two clinical programs, the AB8939 program for acute myeloid leukemia and the masitinib program for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Following the company’s press release dated April 16 [1], three clinical studies—which the company currently considers non-priority and for which patient enrollment had been suspended—are being discontinued, namely:

Phase 2 study (AB20006) of masitinib in mast cell activation syndrome
Phase 3 study (AB15003) of masitinib in mastocytosis
Phase 3 study (AB20009) of masitinib in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis

The discontinuation of these studies is not related to any safety concerns regarding masitinib. The company intends to complete these clinical studies in accordance with applicable regulations.

Stéphane Ledermann, Chairman and CEO of AB Science, stated, "This decision to terminate non-priority studies for which recruitment had been suspended and for which there is no prospect of a rapid resumption reflects compliance with regulatory requirements. It is also consistent with our commitment to allocate all necessary resources to ensure the two priority programs are carried out to the highest standards of quality."

Regarding the AB8939 program for acute myeloid leukemia, the company announced [2] the completion of Phase 1, Step 3, evaluating the combination of AB8939 and venetoclax. The next step is to seek authorization from health authorities—based on a preliminary favorable opinion from the study’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC)—to initiate Phase 4 of the study, which will evaluate the triple combination of AB8939, venetoclax, and azacitidine.

Regarding the Phase 3 program for masitinib in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which was approved in 2025 [3] but has not yet begun, the company will update the protocol and its implementation procedures, and will seek authorization from health authorities to resume this study after submitting a substantial amendment.

About AB23005 in ALS

The AB23005 study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm study conducted in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of masitinib (at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day in combination with riluzole) compared to riluzole plus placebo after 48 weeks of treatment. The study will include 408 patients (randomized in a 1:1 ratio) with ALS who are experiencing normal disease progression (i.e., a functional decline of less than 1.1 points per month) and who have not experienced a complete loss of function (i.e., a score of at least 1 on each of the 12 items of the ALSFRS-R scale). U.S. patients receiving edaravone will also be eligible to participate in the study, as the use of this medication constitutes a stratification factor.

About AB18001 in AML

The AB18001 study, titled "A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AB8939 Administered Intravenously Daily in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia," is designed in several phases. The first part is a dose-escalation study designed to assess the safety and tolerability of AB8939 and to determine the recommended dose for the Phase 2 expansion study.

The objective of the Phase 1 study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the different treatment regimens with AB8939.

Phase 1: Determination of the MTD after 3 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 alone.
Phase 2: Determination of the MTD after 14 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 alone.
Phase 3: Determination of the MTD after 14 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 in combination with venetoclax.
Phase 4: Determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after 14 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine.

(Press release, AB Science, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669139])

GSK’s licensor Hansoh Pharma announces positive phase III results for Ris-Rez in China patient population

On July 10, 2026 GSK plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK) licensor Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. reported that ARTEMIS-008, its pivotal phase III trial evaluating risvutatug rezetecan (Ris-Rez) in patients with advanced or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), met its primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). In the trial, conducted in patients in China, Ris-Rez demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in OS compared with the standard of care, topotecan. Consistent benefit was also observed across key secondary endpoints, including progression-free survival. These data will be used by Hansoh Pharma for regulatory submission in China.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These are the first positive phase III overall survival data reported for a B7-H3-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in any tumour type. The safety profile is consistent with prior Ris-Rez findings, and no new safety signals were identified.

GSK holds exclusive global rights to develop Ris-Rez outside mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. GSK’s broad clinical development programme includes studies in lung cancer, prostate cancer and other solid tumours, including the global phase III EMBOLD SCLC-301 trial in relapsed extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with pivotal data expected next year.

Hesham Abdullah, Senior Vice President, Global Head Oncology, R&D, GSK said: "These results are an important milestone as the first positive phase III overall survival data for a B7-H3-targeted ADC in any tumour type. Together, with other data generated to date, they further support the potential of B7-H3 as a promising target across lung cancer and other solid tumours and reinforce our continued development of Ris-Rez to improve standard of care in areas of high unmet need."

Most patients with ES-SCLC relapse after initial therapy and have limited treatment options, poor prognosis and significant treatment burden.1 B7-H3 is highly expressed in SCLC tumours2,3 and the positive results from ARTEMIS-008 add to the growing body of evidence supporting the encouraging clinical activity and manageable safety profile of Ris-Rez in patients with ES-SCLC.

About risvutatug rezetecan
Ris-Rez is a novel investigational B7-H3-targeted ADC composed of a fully human anti-B7-H3 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a topoisomerase inhibitor payload. GSK acquired exclusive worldwide rights (excluding China’s mainland, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) from Hansoh Pharma to progress clinical development and commercialisation of Ris-Rez.

Regulatory designations received for Ris-Rez to date include orphan drug designations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in SCLC and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in a category of cancer that includes SCLC, called pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma; Priority Medicines (PRIME) Designation from the EMA for relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC; and Breakthrough Therapy Designations for relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC and relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma from the US FDA.

(Press release, GlaxoSmithKline, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669140])

FDA Approves KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) and KEYTRUDA QLEX™ (pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph), Each With Padcev® (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv), as Treatment Before and After Surgery for Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)

On July 10, 2026 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) and KEYTRUDA QLEX (pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph), Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapies, each in combination with Padcev (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv), as neoadjuvant treatment and then continued after cystectomy as adjuvant treatment for the treatment of adult patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). These approvals represent the first and only PD-1 inhibitor plus antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) regimens approved for adults with MIBC regardless of cisplatin eligibility.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These approvals are based on data from the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-B15 trial (also known as EV-304), which was conducted in collaboration with Pfizer and Astellas and enrolled 808 patients. They also expand the previously approved indication based on the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-905 trial (also known as EV-303) for KEYTRUDA and KEYTRUDA QLEX, each in combination with Padcev, in the U.S. as treatment before and after surgery for adult patients with MIBC who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

In KEYNOTE-B15, KEYTRUDA plus Padcev, given before and after surgery, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS), reducing the risk of EFS events (defined as disease progression, recurrence or death) by 47% (HR=0.53 [95% CI, 0.41-0.70]; p<0.0001; 87/405 [21%] versus 146/403 [36%]) in patients with MIBC who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) and surgery. Median EFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, NR-NR) for perioperative KEYTRUDA plus Padcev versus 48.5 months (95% CI, 43.3-NR) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. KEYTRUDA plus Padcev also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS), reducing the risk of death by 35% (HR=0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.89]; p=0.0029; 69/405 [17%] versus 99/403 [25%]) in these patients when compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Median OS was NR (95% CI, NR-NR) for either regimen. The trial showed KEYTRUDA plus Padcev demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (55.8% [95% CI: 50.8, 60.7] versus 32.5% [95% CI: 28.0, 37.3]; p<0.0001). The effectiveness of KEYTRUDA QLEX for its approved indications has been established based upon evidence from the adequate and well-controlled studies conducted with KEYTRUDA and additional data from MK-3475A-D77 comparing the pharmacokinetic, efficacy and safety profiles of KEYTRUDA QLEX and KEYTRUDA.

KEYTRUDA QLEX is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to berahyaluronidase alfa, hyaluronidase or to any of its excipients. KEYTRUDA and KEYTRUDA QLEX are associated with the following Warnings and Precautions: severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions in any or multiple organs, which can occur during or after treatment, including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies, nephritis, dermatologic reactions, solid organ transplant rejection, other transplant (including corneal graft) rejection; severe and life-threatening infusion or injection-related reactions; fatal and other serious complications in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation before or after beginning treatment; embryo-fetal toxicity; and increased mortality in patients with multiple myeloma when KEYTRUDA or KEYTRUDA QLEX is added to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone, which is not recommended outside of controlled trials. Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed here may not include all such possible severe or fatal reactions. For more information, see "Selected Safety Information" below.

"Today’s FDA approvals represent a meaningful development for patients who have muscle-invasive bladder cancer, as nearly half of these patients experience disease recurrence following bladder removal surgery," said Dr. Matthew Galsky, Lillian and Howard Stratton professor of medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, director of genitourinary medical oncology, Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center. "This shift away from traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which has been recommended for eligible patients for more than 20 years, provides important new treatment options for individuals with muscle-invasive bladder cancer regardless of cisplatin eligibility."

"We’re expanding the use of KEYTRUDA and KEYTRUDA QLEX, each in combination with Padcev, for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy with these approvals," said Dr. Marjorie Green, senior vice president and head of oncology, global clinical development, Merck Research Laboratories. "The results from KEYNOTE-B15, together with KEYNOTE-905, highlight the potential of these new treatment options for patients regardless of cisplatin eligibility in the perioperative setting and mark a promising step forward in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer."

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-B15 supporting this approval

KEYNOTE-B15, also known as EV-304, is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, active-control Phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04700124) evaluating perioperative KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and surgery (radical cystectomy [RC] and pelvic lymph node dissection [PLND]) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) and surgery in patients with previously untreated MIBC who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The trial enrolled 808 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either:

Neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg intravenously on Day 1 and Padcev 1.25 mg/kg intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles prior to surgery, followed by adjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 13 cycles and adjuvant Padcev 1.25 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for five cycles (n=405), or;
Neoadjuvant gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles prior to surgery, followed by observation (n=403).
The major efficacy outcome measure was EFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of the following events: disease progression preventing curative surgery, failure to undergo surgery for participants with muscle invasive residual disease, incomplete surgical resection, local or distant recurrence after surgery or death. Additional efficacy outcome measures were OS and pCR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathology review.

Treatment continued until completion of study medications, disease progression, not undergoing or refusal of RC and PLND, disease recurrence in the adjuvant phase or unacceptable toxicity. Assessment of tumor status, including CT/MRI, was performed at baseline, within five weeks prior to RC and PLND, and at six weeks post-RC. Following RC and PLND, assessment of tumor status, including cystoscopy and urine cytology for patients who did not undergo surgery, was performed every 12 weeks up to two years and every 24 weeks thereafter.

A total of 351 (87%) patients receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and 361 (90%) patients receiving gemcitabine with cisplatin underwent RC and PLND. A total of 25 (6%) of patients in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm received adjuvant nivolumab.

The trial was not designed to isolate the effect of KEYTRUDA in each phase (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) of treatment.

For the 403 patients who received KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase, the median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 2.1 months (range: 1 day to 3.9 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was four (range: 1 to 4) out of the planned four cycles in the neoadjuvant phase. For the 262 patients randomized to receive KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and who received any adjuvant treatment, 249 patients received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 8.3 months (range: 1 day to 18.9 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was 13 (range: 1 to 13) out of the planned 13 cycles for patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. Across the combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases (n=403), the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was 10 (range: 1 to 17) out of the planned 17 cycles.

In the neoadjuvant phase of KEYNOTE-B15, serious adverse reactions occurred in 27% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev. The most frequent (≥1.5%) serious adverse reactions were rash (3.2%), pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD) (2.2%) and diarrhea (1.7%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1.7% of patients, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (0.5%) and COVID-19 pneumonia, cardiac arrest, pneumonia, septic shock and urosepsis (0.2% each). Additional fatal adverse reactions were reported in two patients in the post-surgery phase before adjuvant treatment started, including pneumonia and sepsis (one patient each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase due to an adverse reaction occurred in 17% of patients. The most frequent (>1%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were rash (2.2%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and pneumonitis/ILD (1.7% each) and hepatitis (1.2%).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase occurred in 29% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were rash (8%), increased ALT (3.7%), neutropenia (3.2%) and hyperglycemia (2.5%). Of the 403 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev, 13 patients (3.2%) did not receive surgery due to adverse reactions. The adverse reactions that led to cancellation of surgery were multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (0.5%) and adenocarcinoma of colon, COVID-19 pneumonia, cardiac arrest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, glomerulonephritis, immune-mediated lung disease, myocarditis, pneumonia, pneumonitis and urosepsis (0.2% each).

Of the 351 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and underwent RC, 26 (7%) patients experienced delay of surgery (defined as time from last neoadjuvant treatment to surgery exceeding eight weeks) due to adverse reactions.

In the adjuvant phase of KEYNOTE-B15, serious adverse reactions occurred in 35% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase; the most frequent (≥1.5%) serious adverse reactions were urinary tract infection (8%), sepsis (2.8%), diarrhea, hyperglycemia and pneumonitis/ILD (1.6% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.2% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase, including death (0.8%) and cardiac arrest, duodenal ulcer perforation, acute pancreatitis, renal failure, small cell lung cancer and toxic shock syndrome (0.4% each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA due to an adverse reaction occurred in 23% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most frequent (>1%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were diarrhea and pneumonitis/ILD (2.4% each), rash (2%), and hyperglycemia and sepsis (1.2% each).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase occurred in 39% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were diarrhea (6%), urinary tract infection (5%), COVID-19 (3.6%), rash (2.8%) and nausea (2%).

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-905 supporting the previous approval

KEYNOTE-905, also known as EV-303, is an open-label, randomized, multi-arm, controlled Phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03924895) evaluating perioperative KEYTRUDA, with or without Padcev, versus surgery alone in patients with MIBC who are either not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The trial was conducted in collaboration with Pfizer and Astellas and enrolled 344 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either:

Neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg intravenously on Day 1 and Padcev 1.25 mg/kg intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for three cycles prior to surgery, followed by adjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 14 cycles and adjuvant Padcev 1.25 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for six cycles (n=170).
Immediate RC and PLND alone (n=174).
The major efficacy outcome measure was EFS as assessed by BICR, defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of the following events: disease progression preventing curative surgery, failure to undergo surgery for participants with muscle invasive residual disease, incomplete surgical resection, local or distant recurrence after surgery or death. Overall survival and pCR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathology review were additional efficacy outcome measures.

In KEYNOTE-905, KEYTRUDA plus Padcev, given before and after surgery, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in EFS, reducing the risk of EFS events by 60% (HR=0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.57]; p<0.0001; 48/170 [28%] versus 95/174 [55%]) compared to surgery alone in patients with MIBC who are not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Median EFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 37.3-NR) for perioperative KEYTRUDA plus Padcev versus 15.7 months (95% CI, 10.3-20.5) for surgery alone. KEYTRUDA plus Padcev also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS, reducing the risk of death by 50% (HR=0.50 [95% CI, 0.33-0.74]; p=0.0002; 38/170 [22%] versus 68/174 [39%]) in these patients when compared to surgery alone. Median OS was NR (95% CI, NR-NR) for the regimen containing KEYTRUDA plus Padcev compared to 41.7 months (95% CI, 31.8-NR) for surgery alone. The trial showed KEYTRUDA plus Padcev demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in pCR rate compared to surgery alone (57.1% [95% CI: 49.3, 64.6] versus 8.6% [95% CI: 4.9, 13.8]; p<0.0001). The effectiveness of KEYTRUDA QLEX for its approved indications has been established based upon evidence from the adequate and well-controlled studies conducted with KEYTRUDA and additional data from MK-3475A-D77 comparing the pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety profiles of KEYTRUDA QLEX and KEYTRUDA.

A total of 149 (88%) patients in the arm receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and 156 (90%) patients in the RC and PLND alone arm underwent RC and PLND. A total of 29 (17%) of patients in the RC and PLND alone arm received adjuvant nivolumab.

The trial was not designed to isolate the effect of KEYTRUDA in each phase (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) of treatment.

Treatment continued until completion of study medications, disease progression, not undergoing or refusal of RC and PLND, disease recurrence in the adjuvant phase, or unacceptable toxicity. Assessment of tumor status, including CT/MRI, was performed at baseline, within five weeks prior to RC and PLND and at six weeks post-radical cystectomy. Following RC and PLND, assessment of tumor status, including cystoscopy and urine cytology for patients who did not undergo surgery, was performed every 12 weeks up to two years and every 24 weeks thereafter.

For the 167 patients who received KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase, the median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 1.4 months (range: 1 day to 2.7 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was three (range: 1 to 3) out of the planned three cycles in the neoadjuvant phase. For the 100 patients randomized to receive KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and who received any adjuvant treatment, 96 patients received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 8.5 months (range: 1 day to 12.9 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was 12 (range: 1 to 14) out of the planned 14 cycles for patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. Across the combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases (n=167), the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was five (range: 1 to 17) out of the planned 17 cycles.

In the neoadjuvant phase, serious adverse reactions occurred in 27% of patients receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev. The most frequent (≥2%) serious adverse reactions were urinary tract infection (3.6%) and hematuria (2.4%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1.2% of patients, including myasthenia gravis and toxic epidermal necrolysis (0.6% each). Additional fatal adverse reactions were reported in 2.7% of patients in the post-surgery phase before adjuvant treatment started, including sepsis and intestinal obstruction (1.4% each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA due to an adverse reaction occurred in 15% of patients. The most frequent (>1%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were rash (2.4%, including generalized exfoliative dermatitis), increased ALT, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), diarrhea, dysgeusia and toxic epidermal necrolysis (1.2% each).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase occurred in 20% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were rash (4.8%) and neutropenia (2.4%). Of the 167 patients in the KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev arm who received neoadjuvant treatment, seven (4.2%) patients did not receive surgery due to adverse reactions. The adverse reactions that led to cancellation of surgery were acute myocardial infarction, bile duct cancer, colon cancer, respiratory distress, urinary tract infection, and the two deaths due to myasthenia gravis and toxic epidermal necrolysis (0.6% each).

Of the 146 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and underwent radical cystectomy, six (4.1%) patients experienced delay of surgery (defined as time from last neoadjuvant treatment to surgery exceeding eight weeks) due to adverse reactions.

In the adjuvant phase, serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase; the most frequent (≥2%) serious adverse reactions were urinary tract infection (8%), acute kidney injury and pyelonephritis (5% each), urosepsis (4.2%), and hypokalemia, intestinal obstruction and sepsis (2.1% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 7% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase, including urosepsis, intracranial hemorrhage, death, myocardial infarction, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and pseudomonal pneumonia (1% each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA due to an adverse reaction occurred in 29% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most frequent (>2%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were diarrhea (5%) and peripheral neuropathy, acute kidney injury and pneumonitis (2% each).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase occurred in 40% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were rash (7%), urinary tract infection (6%), diarrhea (4%) and abdominal pain, COVID-19, fatigue, pruritus and pyelonephritis (2% each).

About bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide, diagnosed in more than 635,000 patients each year globally. In the U.S., it is estimated there will be more than 84,000 new cases of bladder cancer diagnosed and more than 17,000 deaths from the disease in 2026. According to some clinical practice guidelines, about 25% of newly diagnosed bladder cancer cases are MIBC. The standard of care for patients with MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery, which is shown to prolong survival. However, nearly half of patients who undergo this standard treatment experience recurrence. Additionally, up to half of patients with MIBC are not eligible to receive cisplatin and face limited treatment options, typically undergoing surgery alone.

(Press release, Merck & Co, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669141])