SunRock Biopharma and Chime Biologics Announce Strategic Collaboration to Advance Development of Anti-CCR9 Antibody SRB5

On October 20, 2025 SunRock Biopharma, a biotechnology company focused on developing next-generation therapeutic antibodies, and Chime Biologics, a global leading contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO), reported a strategic collaboration for the development of SRB5, a novel anti-CCR9 monoclonal antibody targeting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with potential expansion into other immune-mediated inflammatory indications.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

SRB5 is a humanized monoclonal antibody with enhanced ADCC properties, designed to selectively deplete CCR9+ cells involved in chronic intestinal inflammation. It is the latest advancement in SunRock’s anti-CCR9 platform and represents a significant advance in a selective therapeutic approach for treating diseases such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Through this partnership, SunRock will benefit from Chime Biologics’ global-standard GMP manufacturing platform to scale production and accelerate preclinical and regulatory milestones.

"We are proud to collaborate with SunRock Biopharma on this promising anti-CCR9 antibody (SRB5) for inflammatory bowel disease, a condition that significantly impacts patients worldwide. This partnership reflects our commitment to applying our global-standard quality and comprehensive experiences in manufacturing biologics to accelerate the development of innovative therapies. We look forward to contributing to the long-term mission of SunRock Biopharma to develop innovative antibodies against highly invasive tumors with an urgent clinical need in oncology," said Dr. Jimmy Wei, President of Chime Biologics.

Dr. Laureano Simón, CEO of SunRock Biopharma, added "This collaboration with Chime Biologics reinforces our strategy of working with world-class partners across every stage of development. Chime’s technical expertise and industrial quality standards will help us scale SRB5 under optimal conditions. SRB5 has a distinctive biological profile that could transform the therapeutic landscape in IBD and potentially in highly aggressive CCR9-expressing tumors. This agreement is a critical step toward clinical validation."

(Press release, SunRock Biopharma, OCT 20, 2025, View Source [SID1234656848])

Leap Therapeutics Presents Final Data from DeFianCe Study at ESMO 2025

On October 20, 2025 Leap Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:LPTX), a biotechnology company focused on developing targeted and immuno-oncology therapeutics, reported final results from Part B of the DeFianCe study (NCT05480306), a Phase 2 study of sirexatamab (DKN-01), an anti-DKK1 monoclonal antibody, in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy (Sirexatamab Arm) compared to bevacizumab and chemotherapy (Control Arm) in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) who have received one prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. The final clinical results were presented on behalf of the DeFianCe study investigators by Zev Wainberg, MD, Professor of Medicine and Co-Director of the GI Oncology Program at UCLA in a Mini Oral session at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2025 in Berlin, Germany.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Circulating DKK1 is a negative prognostic factor and elevated in patients with advanced, metastatic CRC. The data presented at ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) demonstrate that sirexatamab, which binds to and removes free DKK1, has significant potential to provide a survival benefit for CRC patients who have high DKK1 levels and who are likely to have poor outcomes receiving the current standard of care alone," said Dr. Wainberg. "Sirexatamab has the potential to be a valuable addition to the CRC treatment paradigm as a targeted therapeutic for patients with high DKK1 and should move forward to be evaluated in a biomarker-focused registrational trial."

The DeFianCe study was a two part, open-label, multi-country study. Part A of the DeFianCe study enrolled 33 patients, including a significant number of patients who had early progression on first-line therapy, previous exposure to bevacizumab, tumors with RAS mutations, or liver and lung metastases. The study expanded into a 188 patient Part B randomized controlled trial. The primary objective of the study was progression-free survival PFS. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and overall survival (OS). A key pre-defined exploratory population was those patients who had high levels of circulating DKK1, as measured by a biomarker assay.

Key Part B DeFianCe Study Findings:

· Across the DKK1-high (upper median) patients (n=88):
o ORR was 38.0% in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 23.7% ORR in the Control Arm.
o mPFS was 9.03 months in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 7.06 months in the Control Arm, Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.61, p-value = 0.0255.
o mOS was not reached in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 14.39 months in the Control Arm, HR 0.42, p-value = 0.0118.

· Across the DKK1-high (upper quartile) patients (n=44):
o ORR was 44.0% in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 15.8% ORR in the Control Arm.
o mPFS was 9.36 months in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 5.88 months in the Control Arm, HR 0.46, p-value = 0.0168.
o mOS was not reached in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 9.66 months in the Control Arm, HR 0.17, p-value < 0.001.

· In the full intent-to-treat population (n=188):
o ORR was 35.1% in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 26.6% ORR in the Control Arm.
o mPFS was 9.2 months in the Sirexatamab Arm compared to 8.3 months in the Control Arm, HR 0.84, p-value = 0.1712.
o Event-free rate favors Sirexatamab Arm beginning at month 9 (53 vs 47%) with further separation at month 12 (34 vs 23%).

· Sirexatamab, in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab, was safe and well tolerated
o Overall treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAE) profile was similar between the Sirextamab and Control Arms, suggesting sirexatamab did not impact the safety profile when combined with the standard of care.

"The DeFianCe study results demonstrate the significant potential of sirexatamab in patients with advanced CRC. Patients with this aggressive cancer, particularly those with high DKK1 levels, have poor overall survival outcomes and few promising second-line or later options," said Douglas E. Onsi, President and Chief Executive Officer of Leap. "Sirexatamab has repeatedly demonstrated its potential as a novel, first-in-class antibody targeting DKK1 that provides deep and durable benefit for patients in desperate need of new therapies. With support from a recently completed financing, Leap plans to engage with regulatory authorities over the registrational path for sirexatamab in CRC and to optimize the DKK1 biomarker diagnostic test that could be used to identify these CRC patients with poor prognosis."

(Press release, Leap Therapeutics, OCT 20, 2025, View Source [SID1234656817])

ESMO Congress 2025 Presidential Symposium Oral Presentation | Disitamab Vedotin Achieves Major Breakthrough as First-Line Treatment for Urothelial Carcinoma

On October 20, 2025 Remegen reported a Phase III clinical study on disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (RC48-C016) was presented at the Presidential Symposium by Professor Jun Guo from Beijing Cancer Hospital at the 2025 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress. It’s the first time a research led by Chinese scholars in the field of urological oncology has ever been selected in this honorable session. The full manuscript was simultaneously published online in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). This marks the first time that the results of a Chinese evidence-based medical research in the field of urothelial carcinoma have been recognized by both an authoritative international academic conference and a top-tier journal.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The results showed that the RC48-C016 study met the dual primary endpoints of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed median PFS reached 13.1 months, and the median OS reached 31.5 months, demonstrating both statistical and clinical significance.

The RC48-C016 trial is by now the only randomized controlled study from China providing high-level evidence for HER2-ADC as a first-line treatment of HER2-expressing (IHC 1+/2+/3+) locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). The results garnered high attention and sparked lively discussion among global scholars upon release.

Comprehensive Superiority: Meeting Both PFS and OS Primary Endpoints

On the afternoon of October 19 (local time), a pivotal moment arrived at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress: Professor Guo Jun, the principal investigator of the RC48-C016 study, delivered a featured oral presentation at the Presidential Symposium, unveiling the breakthrough results globally for the first time.

The RC48-C016 study is a randomized controlled, multi-center, phase III clinical trial. It compares the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin combined with toripalimab versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who have not received systemic treatment and have HER2 expression (HER2 IHC 1+/2+/3+). The study was initiated in June 2022, with 76 clinical research centers across the country participating, and a total of 484 patients were enrolled. The dual primary endpoints of the study are PFS and OS, and the secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety, etc.

Results as of March 31, 2025, showed:

Regarding PFS, the median PFS in the disitamab vedotin combination group reached 13.1 months, more than doubling the 6.5 months in the chemotherapy group and reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 64% (Hazard Ratio [HR] =0.36, 95% CI: 0.28 – 0.46, P < 0.0001).
The OS data were equally exciting. In this interim survival analysis, the median OS in the disitamab vedotin combination group was 31.5 months, compared to 16.9 months in the platinum-based chemotherapy group. The delayed disease progression has been well translated into long-term survival benefit as the overall survival time almost doubled as compared to chemotherapy, with a 46% reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41 – 0.73, P < 0.0001).
Regarding tumor response, the ORR assessed by BICR reached 76.1% in the disitamab vedotin combination group, far exceeding the 50.2% in the chemotherapy group. For disease control, the DCR in the disitamab vedotin combination group reached 91.4%, significantly higher than the 77.6% in the chemotherapy group.
In key subgroup analyses, significant improvements in median PFS and median OS were observed in the disitamab vedotin combination group compared to the platinum-based chemotherapy across subgroups, regardless of cisplatin eligibility, HER2 expression status, or primary tumor site.
Furthermore, the combination regimen demonstrated a better safety profile. The overall incidence of Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events was only 55.1% in the disitamab vedotin combination group, significantly lower than the 86.9% in the chemotherapy group.
"This is the world’s first large-scale Phase III randomized controlled clinical study in the first-line treatment of HER2-expressing Chinese mUC patients, which demonstrated that HER2-ADC combined with immunotherapy was superior to standard platinum-based chemotherapy, potentially establishing the combination therapy of disitamab vedotin and immunotherapy as the standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced HER2-expressing mUC. This not only signifies that China’s innovative drug development is leading transformations in cancer treatment globally but also provides critical rationale for exploring similar combination strategies in treating other cancers." As Professor Guo Jun commented, the result of the RC48-C016 study confirmed that the efficacy of disitamab vedotin + toripalimab combination regimen surpassed that of traditional chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced mUC, potentially marking a major shift in the treatment landscape for urothelial carcinoma. It promotes innovation in Chinese diagnostic and treatment pathways while providing valuable evidence for global clinical practice.

During the subsequent expert commentary session, Professor Andrea Necchi from Italy’s IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital spoke highly of RC48-C016 study. He pointed out that the study represents a significant breakthrough in the treatment of HER2-positive urothelial carcinoma. Compared to chemotherapy, the combination therapy of disitamab vedotin and toripalimab significantly improves patients’ PFS and OS, demonstrating substantial statistical significance and clinical value, thereby offering a novel treatment option for this patient population.

Precision Treatment, Benefiting the Full Spectrum of HER2-Expressing Population (IHC 1+/2+/3+)

Urothelial carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of the urinary system, representing a significant area of clinical unmet need.

Chinese researchers have been at the forefront of exploring HER2-ADC therapy for UC. The HER2-ADC disitamab vedotin was first approved in China in 2021 for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing (IHC 2+/3+) advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, demonstrating excellent efficacy and consistent safety with that observed in prior clinical trials.

RC48-C016 study prospectively extended its clinical design to the full HER2-expressing population (IHC 1+/2+/3+). Among 765 patients tested for HER2, 632 patients had HER2-expressing characteristics (IHC 1+/2+/3+), accounting for approximately 82.6% of the tested population. The study enrolled 484 patients, who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to groups. Stratification factors were pre-specified in the study design, primarily including cisplatin eligibility, HER2 expression status (IHC 1+ vs. IHC 2+/3+), and presence of visceral metastasis.

The results showed that the efficacy observed in the disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab regimen were consistent across all pre-specified subgroups. Regardless of HER2 expression status, cisplatin eligibility, or whether the tumor originated in the upper or lower urinary tract, disitamab vedotin combined with toripalimab significantly improved PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy, robustly demonstrating its benefit for the full demonstrating its benefit for the full HER2-expressing population (IHC 1+/2+/3+) with urothelial carcinoma.

"The significant survival benefit achieved by disitamab vedotin combined with toripalimab is not subject to the level of HER2 expression or cisplatin eligibility status, delivering benefit to populations with different characteristics," Professor Guo Jun stated, noting that its benefit for the full HER2-expressing population (IHC 1+/2+/3+) is one of the most groundbreaking findings of this study.

Disitamab Vedotin Combined with Immunotherapy, Establishing a New Benchmark in UC First-Line Treatment

Undoubtedly, RC48-C016 study is a milestone in the global first-line treatment landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma, signifying a fundamental shift in the treatment paradigm for HER2-expressing patients:

Firstly, RC48-C016 study is the world’s first Phase III head-to-head trial to demonstrate that the combination of HER2-ADC and immunotherapy is significantly superior to traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2-expressing (IHC 1+/2+/3+) advanced urothelial carcinoma. The release of its outstanding data on PFS, OS, ORR, and safety provides strong decision-making basis for clinicians, which will promote this combination to become a new first-line treatment standard for Chinese mUC patients and is expected to rewrite clinical guidelines.

Secondly, the study successfully implements the concept of precision medicine in urothelial carcinoma based on significant biomarker characteristics. By extending the beneficiary population from the traditional HER2-high (IHC 2+/3+) to the full HER2-expressing (IHC 1+/2+/3+) population, it enables over 80% of urothelial carcinoma patients to potentially benefit significantly from this treatment regimen. In the current clinical practice in China where HER2 routine detection in urothelial carcinoma has been achieved, the study provides a preferred precise treatment plan for the majority of patients and precise basis for anti-HER2 treatment, promoting a comprehensive upgrade in the global treatment concept and strategy for urothelial carcinoma and leading the continuous exploration of this combination therapy in different disease stages of urothelial carcinoma.

Thirdly, this combination regimen substantially reduces the toxicity associated with traditional platinum-based chemotherapy, significantly improving patient treatment tolerance and compliance, and providing a foundation for subsequent continuous therapy, achieving an optimized balance between tumor control, long-term survival, and quality of life.

Since its marketing four years ago, disitamab vedotin, relying on its outstanding efficacy, has achieved a progress from late-line to first-line treatment in the field of urothelial carcinoma, comprehensively breaking through the bottlenecks of traditional chemotherapy and continuously expanding the boundaries of its clinical value. The revelation of RC48-C016 study data once again demonstrates its huge clinical treatment potential.

Based on the breakthrough results of the RC48-C016 study, RemeGen Co., Ltd. submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) in China in July of this year for the new indication of disitamab vedotin combined with toripalimab for the first-line treatment of HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This will not only address domestic clinical needs but also holds the potential to become a "Chinese Solution" influencing the global treatment landscape.

It is believed that with extended follow-up, disitamab vedotin will continue to yield clinical benefit data for broader treatment prospects.

(Press release, RemeGen, OCT 20, 2025, View Source;disitamab-vedotin-achieves-major-breakthrough-as-first-line-treatment-for-urothelial-carcinoma-302588752.html [SID1234656833])

CatalYm Presents Long-Term Phase 1/2a Data Confirming Sustained Responses with Visugromab in CPI-Refractory Tumors at ESMO 2025

On October 20, 2025 CatalYm, a world leader in neutralizing GDF-15 in cancer and cachexia, reported updated long-term data from its ongoing GDFATHER-1/2a trial (NCT04725474) at the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2025. The data provide further evidence that Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) blockade by visugromab can reverse resistance to PD-(L)1 treatment in patients with advanced solid tumors and deliver durable responses in patients who have relapsed or progressed on prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Visugromab is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to neutralize the tumor-derived cytokine GDF-15, which plays a key role in immune suppression and resistance to therapy. The updated dataset highlights visugromab’s potential to reinvigorate immune responses in difficult-to-treat tumor types and patient populations with limited treatment alternatives.

"The durability of responses we are seeing with visugromab in this heavily pretreated, late-stage population is particularly remarkable," said Prof. Dr. Ignacio Melero, Co-Director of Immunology and Immunotherapy at CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, and Principal Investigator of the trial. "To observe ongoing responses extending beyond two and sometimes even three years in patients who had progressed on prior checkpoint inhibition is both encouraging and remarkable in this setting. These data underscore the potential of GDF-15 blockade to establish immune sensitivity in resistant tumors."

Key trial results

Out of 199 patients enrolled, 77 patients with either non-squamous NSCLC (n=22), urothelial cancer (n=27) or hepatocellular carcinoma (n=28) received visugromab in combination with nivolumab, all with progression on prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.
Confirmed objective response rates (RECIST 1.1) were 18.2% (4/22) in non-squamous NSCLC, 18.5% (5/27) in urothelial cancer, and 14.3% (4/28) in hepatocellular carcinoma, including 5 complete responses and multiple deep partial responses across cohorts.
Median duration of response reached 32.2 months in non-squamous NSCLC, 28.8 months in urothelial cancer, and 19.4 months in hepatocellular carcinoma. At data cut-off, 53.8% (7 of 13) of responses were ongoing across all three cohorts.
In 76.9% (10/13) of responders, the duration of response on visugromab plus nivolumab exceeded that of their prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment; 61.5% of responders also achieved a deeper response than previously recorded.
The combination was well tolerated, with treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported in 58.4% of patients. Most TRAEs were Grade 1 or 2 and manageable. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 13% of patients and included expected immune-related events.
In cachectic patients, treatment was associated with clinically meaningful weight gain, indicating potential quality-of-life benefit.
"Our long-term follow-up data suggest that GDF-15 blockade with visugromab may offer meaningful and sustained benefit to patients who progress or do not respond to immunotherapy," said Sujata Rao, MD, Chief Medical Officer at CatalYm. "The duration and depth of responses we continue to observe support further development of visugromab in earlier treatment lines, where maintaining immune sensitivity is critical."

"The growing body of clinical data for visugromab confirms our conviction that GDF-15 neutralization provides a novel strategy to overcome immune resistance and support immune reactivation," said Scott Clarke, Chief Executive Officer at CatalYm. "With several Phase 2b trials now underway, we are focused on translating this approach into improved outcomes across different patient populations and tumor types."

GDFATHER-1/2a (NCT04725474) is a multicenter, open-label Phase 1/2a trial evaluating visugromab in combination with an anti-PD-1 inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. Phase 1 dose escalation comprised one cycle of monotherapy followed by combination treatment, while Phase 2a focused on expansion cohorts e.g. in non-squamous NSCLC, urothelial cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma that had progressed on prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Patients received visugromab at the recommended Phase 2 dose plus nivolumab every two weeks. Key endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response, and translational markers of immune activation.

(Press release, Catalym, OCT 20, 2025, View Source [SID1234656849])

KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) Demonstrates Long-Term Survival Benefit in Certain Patients With Earlier or Advanced Stages of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

On October 20, 2025 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, reported new long-term data highlighting the sustained survival benefits of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapy, in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results are based on the exploratory five-year analyses of KEYNOTE-671 evaluating KEYTRUDA as part of a neoadjuvant followed by adjuvant (perioperative) treatment regimen for patients with resectable NSCLC; and the eight-year analyses of KEYNOTE-024 and -042 and the 10-year analyses of KEYNOTE-001 and -010 evaluating KEYTRUDA as monotherapy in certain patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These long-term data mark a milestone for patients and their families and build upon the transformative progress we’ve already made in non-small cell lung cancer," said Dr. Marjorie Green, senior vice president and head of oncology, global clinical development, Merck Research Laboratories. "Across the spectrum of earlier to advanced stages of disease, these results support the long-term survival benefit of KEYTRUDA in certain patients with NSCLC. We look forward to continued advancements and possibilities for KEYTRUDA in cancer treatment."

In the exploratory five-year follow-up data from the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-671 trial, KEYTRUDA in combination with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and then continued as a single agent as adjuvant treatment after surgery continued to show clinically meaningful improvements in overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) outcomes in certain patients with resectable stage II, IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, compared to neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant placebo alone. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS for the KEYTRUDA regimen versus the chemotherapy-placebo regimen was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59-0.92). For EFS, the HR for the KEYTRUDA regimen versus the chemotherapy-placebo regimen was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.69).

"The five-year benefit demonstrated across overall survival and event-free survival from KEYNOTE-671 supports the continued use of this pembrolizumab-based perioperative regimen as a standard of care for patients with resectable, earlier-stage non-small cell lung cancer," said Dr. Heather Wakelee, principal investigator for KEYNOTE-671, thoracic medical oncologist. "These consistent results are impactful, as they reflect the importance of intervening for certain patients with earlier stages of non-small cell lung cancer." Wakelee is also a professor of medicine at Stanford Medicine.

In the exploratory eight-year analyses from KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 and the exploratory 10-year analyses from KEYNOTE-001 and KEYNOTE-010, KEYTRUDA continued to improve OS in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC compared to chemotherapy.

In KEYNOTE-001, the median OS for patients receiving KEYTRUDA was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.5-15.3) in those with any Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and a median OS of 17.3 months (95% CI,13.7-24.8) in those with a TPS ≥50%. KEYNOTE-001 did not compare KEYTRUDA to another agent or placebo.
In KEYNOTE-010, the median OS for patients receiving KEYTRUDA with a TPS ≥1% was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.0) versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.5-9.5) for chemotherapy (HR=0.66 [95% CI, 0.58-0.76]). For patients receiving KEYTRUDA, with a TPS ≥50%, the median OS was 16.6 months (95% CI, 12.1-21.2) versus 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.8) for chemotherapy (HR=0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.68]).
In KEYNOTE-024, the median OS for patients receiving KEYTRUDA with a TPS ≥50% was 26.3 months (95% CI,18.3-40.4) versus 13.4 months (95% CI, 9.4-18.3) for chemotherapy (HR=0.65 [95% CI, 0.50-0.83]).
In KEYNOTE-042, the median OS for patients receiving KEYTRUDA with a TPS ≥1% was 16.4 months (95% CI, 14.0-19.6) versus 12.1 months (95% CI, 11.3-13.3) for chemotherapy (HR=0.78 [95% CI, 0.69-0.88]). For patients receiving KEYTRUDA with a TPS ≥50%, the median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI, 15.9-24.2) versus 12.2 months (95% CI, 10.4-14.6) for chemotherapy (HR=0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.83]).
Participants from KEYNOTE-001, KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 who achieved a complete response after taking KEYTRUDA and then had progressive disease were eligible for a subsequent anti-cancer therapy including a second course of KEYTRUDA monotherapy.

Additional details about the study designs and results from KEYNOTE-671, KEYNOTE-001, KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042, including selected results of previously reported primary analyses, are described below.

"Historically, patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer faced a poor prognosis, with long-term survival considered unlikely," said Edward B. Garon, MD, MS, professor of medicine, principal investigator for KEYNOTE-001, David Geffen School of Medicine, the University of California, Los Angeles. "The long-term results from these four trials show that pembrolizumab has helped change what certain patients with advanced NSCLC can hope to achieve."

To date, KEYTRUDA monotherapy or combination regimens have demonstrated sustained survival benefits of five years or more across multiple types of cancer, including certain types of metastatic NSCLC (KEYNOTE-189, KEYNOTE-407), melanoma (KEYNOTE-006, KEYNOTE-054), advanced head and neck (KEYNOTE-048), bladder (KEYNOTE-045) and endometrial (KEYNOTE-775) cancers.

The late-breaking five-year data from KEYNOTE-671 were presented during a mini oral session at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2025 (Presentation #LBA67). The eight-year data from KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 and 10-year data from KEYNOTE-001 and KEYNOTE-010 were presented during a poster session at the ESMO (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress 2025 (Presentation #3208P).

Study design and additional five-year data from KEYNOTE-671

KEYNOTE-671 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03425643) evaluating KEYTRUDA in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery and continued adjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA as a single agent, versus placebo plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by resection and adjuvant placebo, in patients with resectable stage II, IIIA or IIIB (T3-4N2) NSCLC (per the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] Cancer Staging Manual). The trial’s dual primary endpoints are EFS and OS. Key secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (mPR). The study enrolled 797 patients who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either:

KEYTRUDA (200 mg intravenously [IV] every three weeks) plus chemotherapy (cisplatin [75 mg/m2 , IV; given on Day 1 of each cycle] and either gemcitabine [1,000 mg/m2, IV; given on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle] or pemetrexed [500 mg/m2 , IV; given on Day 1 of each cycle]) for up to four cycles as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery. Within 4-12 weeks following surgery, KEYTRUDA (200 mg) was administered every three weeks for up to 13 cycles, or;
Placebo (saline IV every three weeks) plus chemotherapy (cisplatin [75 mg/m2 , IV; given on Day 1 of each cycle] and either gemcitabine [1,000 mg/m2, IV; given on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle] or pemetrexed [500 mg/m2, IV; given on Day 1 of each cycle]) for up to four cycles as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery. Within 4‑12 weeks following surgery, placebo was administered every three weeks for up to 13 cycles.
After a median follow-up of 60.4 months (range, 42.6-85.8), the five-year OS rate was 64.6% (95% CI, 59.5%-69.2%) for the KEYTRUDA regimen versus 53.6% (95% CI, 48.3%-58.6%) for the chemotherapy-placebo regimen. Median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, NR-NR) for patients who received the KEYTRUDA regimen versus 70.7 months (95% CI, 53.7-NR) for patients who received the chemotherapy-placebo regimen.

The five-year EFS rate was 49.9% (95% CI, 44.6%-55.0%) for the KEYTRUDA regimen versus 26.5% (95% CI, 21.7%-31.5%) for the chemotherapy-placebo regimen. Median EFS was 57.1 months (95% CI, 38.0-NR) for patients who received the KEYTRUDA regimen versus 18.4 months (95% CI, 14.8-22.1) for patients who received the chemotherapy-placebo regimen.

At the five-year follow-up analysis, Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 45.2% of patients receiving the KEYTRUDA regimen and 37.8% of patients receiving the chemotherapy-placebo regimen. Grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) and infusion reactions occurred in 6.3% of patients receiving the KEYTRUDA regimen and 1.8% of patients receiving the chemotherapy-placebo regimen.

At the study’s previously reported primary analysis, KEYNOTE-671 showed that treatment with the KEYTRUDA regimen reduced the risk of death by 28% (HR=0.72 [95% CI, 0.56-0.93]; p=0.0103) versus the chemotherapy-placebo regimen. For patients who received the KEYTRUDA regimen, median OS was not reached (95% CI, NR-NR) versus 52.4 months (95% CI, 45.7-NR) for patients who received the chemotherapy-placebo regimen. Additionally, the KEYTRUDA regimen reduced the risk of EFS events by 42% (HR=0.58 [95% CI, 0.46-0.72]; p<0.0001) versus the chemotherapy-placebo regimen. For patients who received the KEYTRUDA regimen, median EFS was not reached (95% CI, 34.1-NR) versus 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.3-22.0) for patients who received the chemotherapy-placebo regimen.

(Press release, Merck & Co, OCT 20, 2025, View Source [SID1234656818])

Long-term follow-up data from exploratory analyses of KEYNOTE-001, KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042

In KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042, KEYTRUDA continued to improve OS compared to chemotherapy. In these studies, data showed KEYTRUDA improved OS compared to chemotherapy in patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 (TPS ≥50%). Overall survival results from these long-term follow-up analyses showed:

KEYTRUDA

Chemotherapy

KEYNOTE-001a,b,c

Any TPS

n/N = 54/550

N/A

10y OS rate (95% CI), %

11.3% (8.5%-14.5%)

N/A

Median OS (95% CI), months

13.2 (10.5-15.3)

N/A

TPS ≥50%

n/N = 25/165

N/A

10y OS rate

19.3% (13.1%-26.5%)

N/A

Median OS (95% CI), months

17.3 (13.7-24.8)

N/A

KEYNOTE-010b,d

TPS ≥1%

n/N = 53/690

n/N = 9/343

10y OS rate

9.3% (7.0%-12.1%)

1.9% (0.7%-4.6%)

Median OS (95% CI), months

11.8 (10.3-13.0)

8.3 (7.5-9.5)

HR (95% CI)

0.66 (0.58–0.76)

TPS ≥50%

n/N = 35/290

n/N = 6/152

10y OS rate

15.5% (11.1%-20.5%)

2.7% (0.7%-7.4%)

Median OS (95% CI), months

16.6 (12.1-21.2)

8.2 (6.4-9.8)

HR (95% CI)

0.55 (0.44-0.68)

KEYNOTE-024a

TPS ≥50%

n/N = 36/154

n/N = 14/151

8y OS rate

24.3% (17.6%-31.5%)

12.8% (7.6%-19.3%)

Median OS (95% CI), months

26.3 (18.3-40.4)

13.4 (9.4-18.3)

HR (95% CI)

0.65 (0.50-0.83)

KEYNOTE-042a

TPS ≥1%

n/N = 66/637

n/N = 27/637

8y OS rate

12.0% (9.5%-14.8%)

4.7% (3.1%-6.9%)

Median OS (95% CI), months

16.4 (14.0-19.6)

12.1 (11.3-13.3)

HR (95% CI)

0.78 (0.69-0.88)

TPS ≥50%

n/N = 41/299

n/N = 13/300

8y OS rate

16.6% (12.5%-21.1%)

6.8% (4.1%-10.5%)

Median OS (95% CI), months

20.0 (15.9-24.2)

12.2 (10.4-14.6)

HR (95% CI)

0.70 (0.59-0.83)

n/N, number of patients in KEYNOTE-587/number of patients in parent study.

afirst-line therapy

bsecond-line+ therapy

cIn KEYNOTE-001, KEYTRUDA was not compared to any other agent or placebo.

dtwo doses of pembrolizumab treatment were combined for these analyses

Limited additional lung cancer-specific deaths occurred since the previously reported five-year data across all four trials.

At the conclusion of these initial studies, participants were eligible to transition to the KEYNOTE-587 extension study for long-term follow-up. The primary endpoint for KEYNOTE-587 is OS. For patients in KEYNOTE-587, the median time from first treatment in KEYNOTE-001 or randomization in KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 to data cutoff was 124.6 months (range, 118.5-142.2), 115 months (range, 108.8-124.6), 106.4 months (range, 102.4-114.3) and 99 months (range, 86.6-110.2), respectively.

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-001

Ten-year outcomes for KEYTRUDA were measured in the Phase 1b KEYNOTE-001 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01295827), which evaluated 550 patients with treatment-naïve or previously treated advanced NSCLC. Patients received 2 mg/kg IV of KEYTRUDA every three weeks or 10 mg/kg IV of KEYTRUDA every two weeks or every three weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and OS.

At the study’s previously reported primary analysis, KEYNOTE-001 showed that KEYTRUDA demonstrated an ORR of 41% in patients with a TPS ≥50%; all responses were partial responses (95% CI, 29-54). Of the patients who responded, 84% continued to respond to treatment with KEYTRUDA, including 11 patients with ongoing responses of six months or longer.

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-010

Ten-year outcomes for KEYTRUDA were measured in the Phase 2/3 KEYNOTE-010 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01905657), which evaluated patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors expressed PD-L1 (TPS ≥1%) that had progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy and, if appropriate, targeted therapy for EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. The trial enrolled 1,033 patients who were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 2 mg/kg IV or 10 mg/kg IV of KEYTRUDA every three weeks or chemotherapy (docetaxel) every three weeks. The primary endpoints for this trial were OS and PFS, and secondary endpoints included ORR and duration of response (DOR).

At the study’s previously reported primary analysis, KEYNOTE-010 showed that 2 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of death by 29% (HR=0.71 [95% CI, 0.58-0.88]; p<0.001), and 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of death by 39% (HR=0.61 [95% CI, 0.49-0.75]; p<0.001) in patients with a TPS ≥1% versus chemotherapy. Two mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 12% (HR=0.88 [95% CI, 0.73-1.04]; p=0.068) and 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 21% (HR=0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.94]; p=0.005) in patients with a TPS ≥1% versus chemotherapy. Additionally, the analysis showed that 2 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of death by 46% (HR=0.54 [95% CI, 0.38-0.77]; p<0.001), and 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of death by 50% (HR=0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.70]; p<0.001) in patients with a TPS ≥50% versus chemotherapy. Two mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 42% (HR=0.58 [95% CI, 0.43-0.77]; p<0.001), and 10 mg/kg of KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 41% (HR=0.59 [95% CI, 0.45-0.78]; p<0.001) in patients with a TPS ≥50% versus chemotherapy.

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-024

Eight-year outcomes for KEYTRUDA were measured in the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-024 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02142738), which evaluated patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express high levels of PD-L1 (TPS ≥50%) with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. The trial enrolled 305 patients who were randomized (1:1) to receive 200 mg of KEYTRUDA every three weeks or platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint for this trial was PFS, and secondary endpoints included OS and ORR. In this study, 10.3% (209) of patients transitioned to KEYNOTE-587.

At the study’s previously reported primary analysis, KEYNOTE-024 showed that KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 50% (HR=0.50 [95% CI, 0.37-0.68]; p<0.001) versus chemotherapy. Additionally, KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of death by 40% (HR=0.60 [95% CI, 0.41-0.89]; p=0.005) versus chemotherapy.

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-042

Eight-year outcomes for KEYTRUDA were measured in the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-042 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02220894), which evaluated patients with stage III NSCLC who were not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation, or metastatic NSCLC, and whose tumors expressed PD-L1 (TPS ≥1%) and who had not received prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC. The trial enrolled 1,251 patients who were randomized (1:1) to receive 200 mg of KEYTRUDA every three weeks or platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint for this trial was OS in patients with a TPS ≥50%, ≥20% or ≥1% and secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST v1.1 in patients with a TPS ≥50%, ≥20% or ≥1%. In this study, 4.4% (50) of patients transitioned to KEYNOTE-587.

At the study’s previously reported primary analysis, KEYNOTE-042 showed that KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of death by 31% (HR=0.69 [95% CI, 0.56-0.85]; p=0.0006) in patients with a TPS ≥50% and by 19% (HR=0.81 [95% CI, 0.71-0.93]; p=0.0036) in patients with a TPS ≥1% versus chemotherapy. Median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI, 15.4-24.9) for KEYTRUDA in patients with a TPS ≥50% versus 12.2 months (95% CI, 10.4-14.2) for chemotherapy, and 16.7 months (95% CI, 13.9-19.7) for KEYTRUDA in patients with a TPS ≥1% versus 12.1 months (95% CI, 11.3-13.3) for chemotherapy.

About lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In 2022 alone, there were approximately 2.4 million new cases and 1.8 million deaths from lung cancer globally. Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for about 80% of all cases. In 2025, the overall five-year survival rate for patients diagnosed with lung cancer was 27% in the United States. Improved survival rates are due, in part, to earlier detection and screening, reduction in smoking, advances in diagnostic and surgical procedures, as well as the introduction of new therapies. Early detection and screening remain an important unmet need, as 44% of lung cancer cases are not found until they are advanced.