Tachyon Announces Presentations at the ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2021 Tachyon Therapeutics, Inc. ("Tachyon" or "the Company"), a research and development biotechnology company, reported two abstract presentations of the Company’s lead product candidate, TACH101, at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) ("ASCO") Annual Meeting. ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) is being held virtually from June 4-8, 2021 (Press release, Tachyon Therapeutics, JUN 4, 2021, View Source [SID1234583596]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are excited about the emerging preclinical profile of TACH101, the first inhibitor of KDM4 histone demethylase to be in clinical studies," stated Frank Perabo, MD, PhD, CEO of Tachyon Therapeutics. "Epigenetic processes play a fundamental role in regulation of cellular biology, but when unregulated, can lead to cancer development and progression. Data presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) show favorable pharmacologic properties for TACH101, compelling efficacy data in animal models, and broad applicability as a potential anti-cancer agent. We look forward to advancing this molecule into first-in-human trials later this year."

Highlights from the two ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) abstracts are summarized below:

Abstract #3105

TACH101 demonstrated potent increase in H3 methylation levels (H3K36me3), showing on-target activity.
TACH101 triggered effective tumor control in xenograft models including colorectal, esophageal, gastric, breast, and lymphoma with tumor growth inhibition of up to 100%.
Further evaluation using a panel of patient-derived colorectal models and patient-derived organoids showed a strong correlation of TACH101 sensitivity with MSI-H status (IC50 ranges 1-150 nM).
TACH101 reduced tumorigenic potential by 4.4-fold, suggesting that reduction of cancer stem cells by TACH101 may be effective in therapy-resistant settings.
The poster presentation of Abstract #3105 is available for viewing on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting website at View Source

Abstract #e15067

TACH101 showed potent KDM4 inhibition without significant off-target activity in in vitro and in vivo studies.
Pharmacokinetic studies showed TACH101 exhibited low clearance, moderate volume of distribution, and good oral bioavailability in mouse, rat, and dog.
TACH101 had little or no inhibitory effects on CYP enzyme activities.
The exposure from oral administration in rats and dogs was dose proportional and was not affected by food intake in dogs.
Presentation of Abstract #e15067 is available for viewing on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting website at View Source

Bayer at ASCO: Vitrakvi Effective in TRK Fusion Cancers Regardless of Tumor Type

On June 4, 2021 Bayer reported that it is presenting study results at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual meeting being held online June 4-8, 2021 (Press release, Bayer, JUN 4, 2021, View Source [SID1234583613]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In particular, Bayer is presenting four abstracts related to its Vitrakvi (larotrectinib) across TRK fusion cancer patients of all ages, ranging from 0.1 to 84 years, and for multiple tumor types. Vitrakvi is a first-in-class TRK inhibitor for TRK and presenters are supporting the drug’s effectiveness in a range of cancers with TRK gene fusions regardless of tissue type or patient age.

Scott Fields, Head Senior Vice President, Oncology Development, Bayer Global, and Hendrik Nogai, Vice President, Global Development Lead NTRK Program, SBU Oncology, Bayer, took time out ahead of ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) to speak with BioSpace about the drug and the upcoming presentations.

The four specific presentations look at long-term efficacy and safety of the drug in an integrated dataset of TRK fusion cancer patients; long-term results of the drug in patients with TRK fusion lung cancer; intra-patient comparison of Vitrakvi clinical trials in TRK fusion cancer, which is an expanded dataset; and results of the drug in adults and children with TRK fusion-positive primary tumors of the central nervous system.

Fields emphasizes that Vitrakvi is not tissue specific, but works on a particular type of gene fusion known as neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), or just TRK. It received accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). With the accelerated approval pathway, drugs for serious conditions that fill an unmet medical need can be approved based on a surrogate endpoint, which allows them to get on the market faster. That surrogate endpoint is often a laboratory measurement, radiographic imagine, physical sign or other measure that is believed to predict clinical benefit but is not by itself a measure of clinical benefit. Then, the company continues to conduct studies to verify the drug’s efficacy and safety.

"TRK fusion cancers can come from the liver, they can come from the pancreas, they can come from the brain. It’s more about the mutation," Fields said. "It’s not about which tissue it comes from. And this is the first time ever that a tumor has been defined by a mutation, not by the histologic tissue. It drives the cancer. And when we block it with Vitrakvi, you see responses that are really quite extraordinary."

For example, the studies they are presenting indicate a 75% overall response rate (ORR) that is very durable. Fields says the overall survival time "hasn’t even been reached at forty-nine months."

The expanded data has a longer follow-up with 206 adult and pediatric patients that could be evaluated. They had TRK fusion cancer across 21 different tumor types. Out of that 75% ORR, 22% were complete responses. For the patients with brain metastases, the ORR was 73%. The median duration of response (DoR) was 49.3 months at a median follow-up of 22.3 months.

"We not only confirmed the data, but even seemed to improve on it," Nogai said. "So we see longer durability of the responses and the responses rate is even increasing with time."

The 22% complete responses in solid tumors, Nogai added, "is quite remarkable, and with the long follow-up, we have a median duration of response of 49 months. This is almost unheard of."

The additional data also suggests a very good safety profile, even though "the patients may remain on treatment for many years," according to Nogai.

One of the presentations also shows the drug’s activity in patients with central nervous system metastases. The data presented includes an updated and extended retrospective growth modulation index (GMI) analysis limited to patients enrolled in Vitrakvi trials with at least one previous line of therapy. GMI is a retrospective intra-patient comparison that utilizes the patient as their own control by comparing PFS on current therapy to time to progress or treatment failure (TTP) on the most recent previous therapy.

"This was one area of uncertainty. We did not have a lot of patients with CNS disease. But now, with the expanded dataset, we can see that it is an active drug," Nogai said.

Updated data with a cut-off of July 20, 2020, is being presented on heavily pre-treated adult patients with TRK fusion with lung cancer. The patients received a median of three previous therapies. The data demonstrated the drug’s consistent response rates with longer follow-up.

"The response rate in these fifty patients is around 73% again," Nogai said. "Remarkable durability at 34 months in patients that is still ongoing, and with a PFS of 35 months."

Both Fields and Nogai emphasized that Vitrakvi is turning out to be effective in children and adults with TRK fusion cancers.

"We should mention that we do have a liquid formulation. So even the very, very young patients can receive this, as well as older patients," Fields said. "It’s very important to ensure that patients are getting tested for TRK fusions, because Vitrakvi is demonstrating really good activity in these patients across cancer types and different ages."

There are several ways to test for the gene fusions, with the most easy and affordable being immunohistochemistry (IHC), although there are also next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests and PCR as well, which are more expensive, and typically used for confirmation. The results of these studies present a strong argument for comprehensive genomic testing that includes NTRK 1/2/3 genes for patients, to better understand what is driving the cancer and to appropriately match them with the right treatment approach.

Fields notes, "This is an inexpensive way to look for patients, but it always has to be confirmed. NGS is the standard for confirmation but is quite expensive and not routinely performed. However, correct diagnosis is one of the most important things we’re doing. Doctors really need to be aware of this. You need the pediatric oncologist to understand it and the oncologists focused on adults or specific cancers. This drug represents a meaningful advancement in the treatment of both adult and pediatric patients with TRK fusion cancer, regardless of where they originate in the body."

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement

On June 4, 2021, Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), reported that it entered into an At The Market Offering Agreement, dated June 4, 2021 (the "ATM Agreement") with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC ("Wainwright"), as sales agent, in connection with an "at the market offering" under which the Company from time to time may offer and sell shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Common Stock"), having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000 (the "Shares") (Filing, 8-K, Caladrius Biosciences, JUN 4, 2021, View Source [SID1234583632]). Shares sold under the ATM Agreement will be offered and sold pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, which was initially filed on April 1, 2021 and which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on May 4, 2021 (Registration No. 333-254971) (the "Registration Statement") and a prospectus supplement that the Company expects to file with the SEC relating to the Shares shortly after the filing of this Current Report on Form 8-K.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

This Current Report on Form 8-K shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the Shares, nor shall there be any offer, solicitation or sale of the Shares in any state or country in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or country.

The opinion of the Company’s counsel regarding the validity of the Shares is filed as Exhibit 5.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. This opinion is also filed with reference to, and is hereby incorporated by reference into, the Registration Statement.

The Company cautions you that statements included in this Current Report on Form 8-K that are not a description of historical facts are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding the Company’s ability to sell Shares pursuant to the ATM Agreement. The inclusion of forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by the Company that any of these statements, results or sales will be achieved or completed due in part to risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company’s business, including those described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update this report to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This caution is made under the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Lilly Announces New Clinical Data from Verzenio and Oral SERD Programs at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2021 Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) reported new data for the investigational use of Verzenio (abemaciclib) in high risk early breast cancer, and for its oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) LY3484356 at the 57th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) (Press release, Eli Lilly, JUN 4, 2021, View Source [SID1234583531]). Lilly is presenting an exploratory analysis from the positive Phase 3 monarchE trial evaluating Verzenio, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in a subgroup of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) high risk early breast cancer (EBC) who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Physicians often treat patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer who they believe to be at the highest risk of recurrence with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to curative intent surgery. In addition, Loxo Oncology at Lilly is presenting interim clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1a trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the oral SERD LY3484356 in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer and endometrial endometrioid cancer.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

New Verzenio Data from monarchE Trial
In an exploratory analysis of a pre-specified subgroup of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=2,056), the addition of Verzenio to endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in a numerically greater effect size when compared to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n=5,637). This subgroup of patients made up more than 36 percent of the total trial population, had larger tumors at initial diagnosis and were more commonly premenopausal, representing one of the highest risk subgroups of patients in monarchE. Treatment with Verzenio in combination with standard adjuvant ET decreased the risk of breast cancer recurrence in these patients by 38.6 percent compared to ET alone (HR: 0.614; 95% CI: 0.473, 0.797). This corresponds to a 6.6 percent difference in the two-year rate of invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) between arms (87.2 percent in the Verzenio plus ET arm compared to 80.6 percent in the ET only control arm). The addition of Verzenio to ET also reduced the risk of developing metastatic disease by 39 percent (HR: 0.609; 95% CI: 0.459, 0.809). This corresponds to a 6.7 percent difference in two-year distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) rates – or time to developing breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body – between the arms (89.5 percent in the Verzenio plus ET arm compared to 82.8 percent in the ET only control arm). This subgroup analysis was exploratory and not alpha-controlled for testing statistical significance. Safety data from the monarchE trial were consistent with the known safety profile of Verzenio and no new safety signals were observed.

"People who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy typically represent a patient population with a substantial risk of breast cancer recurrence. The data from monarchE further confirm this higher risk based on the number of events that occurred in the control arm for this subset of patients," said Maura Dickler, M.D., distinguished medical fellow, Lilly Oncology. "Given the need for new treatments for high risk early breast cancer, especially in this neoadjuvant population, it’s encouraging to see these impressive results with a 38 percent reduction in the risk of recurrence with the addition of Verzenio to standard endocrine therapy."

These data build on the results from the Phase 3 monarchE trial, which met its primary endpoint at the second interim efficacy analysis by showing a statistically significant improvement in IDFS. Verzenio, given in combination with ET, decreased the risk of breast cancer recurrence by 28.7 percent compared to ET alone (HR: 0.713; 95% CI: 0.583, 0.871; p=0.0009) with a 3 percent absolute difference in the two-year IDFS and DRFS rates in the ITT population. The monarchE trial is ongoing and patients will continue to be followed to assess safety, overall survival and patient reported outcomes, as well as other endpoints.

New Verzenio Phase 3 Trial
Lilly recently initiated a new Phase 3 trial, eMonarcHER, which will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Verzenio in combination with standard adjuvant ET in patients with HR+, HER2+, node-positive, high risk early breast cancer receiving adjuvant ET after completing surgery and neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant HER2 targeted therapy. Despite several advancements for the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of HER2+ breast cancer, research has primarily involved HER2 targeting agents; however, not all HER2+ breast cancers are successfully treated with HER2 targeted therapy. This new Phase 3 study introduces the novel strategy of CDK4/6 inhibition to improve outcomes with adjuvant hormonal therapy in patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer at high risk of recurrence after completion of HER2 targeted therapy. Lilly shared the trial design of eMonarcHER at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper).

Oral SERD (LY3484356) Phase 1a Data
The first clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1 EMBER trial of LY3484356 were also presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper). As of April 7, 2021, 65 patients were enrolled in the trial, including 58 with ER+ advanced breast cancer and seven with ER+ endometrial endometrioid cancer (EEC). All patients received LY3484356 monotherapy. Advanced breast cancer patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy with 60 percent receiving prior fulvestrant, 83 percent a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 26 percent chemotherapy. Of 54 patients with available circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data, ESR1 mutations were detected in 37 percent.

Pharmacokinetic analyses during the dose escalation phase demonstrated dose-proportional increases in LY3484356 exposure across all evaluated doses (200 mg once daily [QD] to 1200 mg QD). At all doses, steady state LY3484356 plasma concentrations in patients exceeded the EC80 range associated with efficacy in preclinical studies, as well as steady state fulvestrant peak serum concentration.

No dose limiting toxicities were observed and no maximum tolerated dose was established. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The treatment-related adverse events observed most commonly were nausea (19 [29%]), diarrhea (11 [17%]), and fatigue (8 [12%]). Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in six (9%) patients, which were treatment-related in two (3%) patients (diarrhea [n=1] and decreased neutrophil count [n=1]). Serious adverse events occurred in three (5%) patients, only one of which, grade 3 diarrhea, was treatment-related. No cardiac safety signal was seen. Dose reductions due to adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients, one of which was the treatment-related grade 3 diarrhea. No patient discontinued due to an adverse event and 400 mg QD has been selected as the recommended Phase 2 dose.

The efficacy data presented were based on investigator assessment. Patients were considered efficacy-evaluable for objective response rate (ORR) if they had RECIST measurable disease at baseline and at least one post-baseline tumor assessment or discontinued treatment prior to their first post-baseline assessment and for clinical benefit rate (CBR) if they were enrolled at least 24 weeks prior to the data cut-off date. In advanced breast cancer, two confirmed partial responses were observed in 35 efficacy-evaluable patients, both occurring after 24 weeks of therapy at the 400 mg dose and in patients who had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. One of the observed partial responses was seen in a patient with fulvestrant, CDK4/6, and chemotherapy-refractory disease. The other partial response occurred in a patient with three lines of prior endocrine therapy, including an mTOR inhibitor. The CBR across all dose levels was 48 percent (13/27). In EEC, no objective responses were observed among the six efficacy-evaluable patients and the CBR was 50 percent (2/4). In patients with available serial ctDNA data, 86 percent (18/21) had early (cycle 2 day 1) declines in overall ctDNA and the degree of decline was generally deeper in patients who experienced clinical benefit versus those who did not. As of the data cut-off, 35 patients remained on treatment, including both patients with partial responses, and 79 percent (31/39) of those with stable disease or partial responses.

"When we began clinical development of our oral SERD, we hoped to see pharmacokinetic exposures that exceeded fulvestrant, a safety profile amenable to chronic use and combination, and evidence of single agent efficacy. To date, LY3484356 has delivered on these objectives," said David Hyman, M.D., chief medical officer, oncology at Lilly. "We look forward to continuing to explore the profile of LY3484356 in the ongoing dose expansion portion of the EMBER study and through the Phase 3 EMBER-3 trial in metastatic ER+, HER2- breast cancer, set to begin later this year."

Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial of LY3484356
Lilly is preparing to initiate a randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study of LY3484356 in patients with ER+, HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Patients will be randomized to receive LY3484356 monotherapy or investigator’s choice of monotherapy endocrine therapy (fulvestrant or exemestane). The trial, EMBER-3, is expected to begin enrollment in the third quarter of 2021.

Please refer to Lilly’s press release from May 19, 2021 for a full list of presentations at the meeting.

About the monarchE Trial
monarchE is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial that enrolled 5,637 patients with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high risk early breast cancer. Patients were randomized 1:1 to Verzenio (150 mg twice daily) plus standard adjuvant ET or standard adjuvant ET alone. Patients were treated for two years (treatment period) or until meeting criteria for discontinuation. Patients in both arms will receive 5-10 years of ET as clinically indicated (2 years on study followed by a further 3-8 years in long-term follow-up). The primary objective is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) defined according to the Standard Definitions for Efficacy Endpoints (STEEP) criteria. In adjuvant breast cancer trials, this includes the length of time before any cancer comes back, a new cancer develops or death. Secondary objectives include distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics and health outcomes.

High risk was specifically defined as women (any menopausal status) and men with resected HR+, HER2- invasive early breast cancer with either ≥4 pathologically positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) or 1 to 3 positive ALNs and at least one of the following high-risk features: primary invasive tumor size ≥5 cm, histological grade 3 tumor, or central Ki-67 index ≥20%. If applicable, patients must have also completed adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to enrolling and have recovered from all acute side effects.

About Verzenio (abemaciclib)
Verzenio (abemaciclib) is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK)4/6, which are activated by binding to D-cyclins. In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines, cyclin D1 and CDK4/6 promote phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), cell cycle progression, and cell proliferation.

In vitro, continuous exposure to Verzenio inhibited Rb phosphorylation and blocked progression from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle, resulting in senescence and apoptosis (cell death). Preclinically, Verzenio dosed daily without interruption resulted in reduction of tumor size. Inhibiting CDK4/6 in healthy cells can result in side effects, some of which may be serious. Clinical evidence also suggests that Verzenio crosses the blood-brain barrier. In patients with advanced cancer, including breast cancer, concentrations of Verzenio and its active metabolites (M2 and M20) in cerebrospinal fluid are comparable to unbound plasma concentrations.

About the EMBER Trial
This global, first-in-human, open-label Phase 1a/b trial evaluates LY3484356 alone or in combination with other anticancer therapies in participants with ER+ advanced breast cancer or endometrioid endometrial cancer. The trial includes a Phase 1a dose escalation phase and a Phase 1b dose expansion phase. The Phase 1a dose escalation enrolls patients with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who have received up to three prior treatment regimens and ER+ EEC who have progressed after prior platinum-based therapy. The dose escalation phase followed an i3+3 design with LY3484356 administered orally in 28-day cycles. As dose cohorts were cleared, additional patient enrollment to cleared dose levels was permitted. The primary objective of the Phase 1a portion is to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives include assessments of safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity (objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR), as assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1).

About LY3484356
LY3484356 is an investigational, oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) with pure antagonistic properties. The estrogen receptor (ER) is the key therapeutic target for patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Novel degraders of ER may overcome endocrine therapy resistance while providing consistent oral pharmacology and convenience of administration. LY3484356 was specifically designed to deliver continuous estrogen receptor target inhibition throughout the dosing period and regardless of ESR1 mutational status.

LY3484356 is currently being studied in the first-in-human, multi-center Phase 1a/1b EMBER trial in patients with estrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and other select non-breast cancers and in the Phase 1 EMBER-2 trial in preoperative, postmenopausal women with stage I-III, ER+/HER2- breast cancer. For additional information about LY3484356 clinical trials, please refer to www.clinicaltrials.gov. Interested patients and physicians can contact the Loxo Oncology at Lilly clinical trial team by e-mailing [email protected].

INDICATION
Verzenio is indicated for the treatment of HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer:

in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal women as initial endocrine-based therapy
in combination with fulvestrant for women with disease progression following endocrine therapy
as a single agent for adult patients with disease progression following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR VERZENIO (abemaciclib)

Diarrhea occurred in 81% of patients receiving Verzenio plus an aromatase inhibitor in MONARCH 3, 86% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and 90% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 9% of patients receiving Verzenio plus an aromatase inhibitor in MONARCH 3, 13% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and in 20% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. Episodes of diarrhea have been associated with dehydration and infection.

Diarrhea incidence was greatest during the first month of Verzenio dosing. In MONARCH 3, the median time to onset of the first diarrhea event was 8 days, and the median duration of diarrhea for Grades 2 and 3 were 11 and 8 days, respectively. In MONARCH 2, the median time to onset of the first diarrhea event was 6 days, and the median duration of diarrhea for Grades 2 and 3 were 9 days and 6 days, respectively. In MONARCH 3, 19% of patients with diarrhea required a dose omission and 13% required a dose reduction. In MONARCH 2, 22% of patients with diarrhea required a dose omission and 22% required a dose reduction. The time to onset and resolution for diarrhea were similar across MONARCH 3, MONARCH 2, and MONARCH 1.

Instruct patients that at the first sign of loose stools, they should start antidiarrheal therapy such as loperamide, increase oral fluids, and notify their healthcare provider for further instructions and appropriate follow-up. For Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, or diarrhea that requires hospitalization, discontinue Verzenio until toxicity resolves to ≤Grade 1, and then resume Verzenio at the next lower dose.

Neutropenia occurred in 41% of patients receiving Verzenio plus an aromatase inhibitor in MONARCH 3, 46% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and 37% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. A Grade ≥3 decrease in neutrophil count (based on laboratory findings) occurred in 22% of patients receiving Verzenio plus an aromatase inhibitor in MONARCH 3, 32% of patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 and in 27% of patients receiving Verzenio alone in MONARCH 1. In MONARCH 3, the median time to first episode of Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 33 days, and in MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 1, was 29 days. In MONARCH 3, median duration of Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 11 days, and for MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 1 was 15 days.

Monitor complete blood counts prior to the start of Verzenio therapy, every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, monthly for the next 2 months, and as clinically indicated. Dose interruption, dose reduction, or delay in starting treatment cycles is recommended for patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Febrile neutropenia has been reported in <1% of patients exposed to Verzenio in the MONARCH studies. Two deaths due to neutropenic sepsis were observed in MONARCH 2. Inform patients to promptly report any episodes of fever to their healthcare provider.

Severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or pneumonitis can occur in patients treated with Verzenio and other CDK4/6 inhibitors. Across clinical trials (MONARCH 1, MONARCH 2, MONARCH 3), 3.3% of Verzenio-treated patients had ILD/pneumonitis of any grade, 0.6% had Grade 3 or 4, and 0.4% had fatal outcomes. Additional cases of ILD/pneumonitis have been observed in the post-marketing setting, with fatalities reported.

Monitor patients for pulmonary symptoms indicative of ILD/pneumonitis. Symptoms may include hypoxia, cough, dyspnea, or interstitial infiltrates on radiologic exams. Infectious, neoplastic, and other causes for such symptoms should be excluded by means of appropriate investigations.

Dose interruption or dose reduction is recommended in patients who develop persistent or recurrent Grade 2 ILD/pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue Verzenio in all patients with grade 3 or 4 ILD/pneumonitis.

Grade ≥3 increases in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (6% versus 2%) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (3% versus 1%) were reported in the Verzenio and placebo arms, respectively, in MONARCH 3. Grade ≥3 increases in ALT (4% versus 2%) and AST (2% versus 3%) were reported in the Verzenio and placebo arms respectively, in MONARCH 2.

In MONARCH 3, for patients receiving Verzenio plus an aromatase inhibitor with Grade ≥3 increases in ALT or AST, median time to onset was 61 and 71 days, respectively, and median time to resolution to Grade <3 was 14 and 15 days, respectively. In MONARCH 2, for patients receiving Verzenio plus fulvestrant with Grade ≥3 increases in ALT or AST, median time to onset was 57 and 185 days, respectively, and median time to resolution to Grade <3 was 14 and 13 days, respectively.

For assessment of potential hepatotoxicity, monitor liver function tests (LFTs) prior to the start of Verzenio therapy, every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, monthly for the next 2 months, and as clinically indicated. Dose interruption, dose reduction, dose discontinuation, or delay in starting treatment cycles is recommended for patients who develop persistent or recurrent Grade 2, or Grade 3 or 4, hepatic transaminase elevation.

Venous thromboembolic events were reported in 5% of patients treated with Verzenio plus an aromatase inhibitor as compared to 0.6% of patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor plus placebo in MONARCH 3. Venous thromboembolic events were reported in 5% of patients treated with Verzenio plus fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 as compared to 0.9% of patients treated with fulvestrant plus placebo. Venous thromboembolic events included deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pelvic venous thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, subclavian and axillary vein thrombosis, and inferior vena cava thrombosis. Across the clinical development program, deaths due to venous thromboembolism have been reported. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and treat as medically appropriate.

Verzenio can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman based on findings from animal studies and the mechanism of action. In animal reproduction studies, administration of abemaciclib to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis caused teratogenicity and decreased fetal weight at maternal exposures that were similar to the human clinical exposure based on area under the curve (AUC) at the maximum recommended human dose. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Verzenio and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose. There are no data on the presence of Verzenio in human milk or its effects on the breastfed child or on milk production. Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during Verzenio treatment and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants. Based on findings in animals, Verzenio may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential.

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥10%) observed in MONARCH 3 for Verzenio plus anastrozole or letrozole and ≥2% higher than placebo plus anastrozole or letrozole vs placebo plus anastrozole or letrozole were diarrhea (81% vs 30%), neutropenia (41% vs 2%), fatigue (40% vs 32%), infections (39% vs 29%), nausea (39% vs 20%), abdominal pain (29% vs 12%), vomiting (28% vs 12%), anemia (28% vs 5%), alopecia (27% vs 11%), decreased appetite (24% vs 9%), leukopenia (21% vs 2%), creatinine increased (19% vs 4%), constipation (16% vs 12%), ALT increased (16% vs 7%), AST increased (15% vs 7%), rash (14% vs 5%), pruritus (13% vs 9%), cough (13% vs 9%), dyspnea (12% vs 6%), dizziness (11% vs 9%), weight decreased (10% vs 3%), influenza-like illness (10% vs 8%), and thrombocytopenia (10% vs 2%).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥10%) observed in MONARCH 2 for Verzenio plus fulvestrant and ≥2% higher than placebo plus fulvestrant vs placebo plus fulvestrant were diarrhea (86% vs 25%), neutropenia (46% vs 4%), fatigue (46% vs 32%), nausea (45% vs 23%), infections (43% vs 25%), abdominal pain (35% vs 16%), anemia (29% vs 4%), leukopenia (28% vs 2%), decreased appetite (27% vs 12%), vomiting (26% vs 10%), headache (20% vs 15%), dysgeusia (18% vs 3%), thrombocytopenia (16% vs 3%), alopecia (16% vs 2%), stomatitis (15% vs 10%), ALT increased (13% vs 5%), pruritus (13% vs 6%), cough (13% vs 11%), dizziness (12% vs 6%), AST increased (12% vs 7%), peripheral edema (12% vs 7%), creatinine increased (12% vs <1%), rash (11% vs 4%), pyrexia (11% vs 6%), and weight decreased (10% vs 2%).

The most common adverse reactions (all grades, ≥10%) observed in MONARCH 1 with Verzenio were diarrhea (90%), fatigue (65%), nausea (64%), decreased appetite (45%), abdominal pain (39%), neutropenia (37%), vomiting (35%), infections (31%), anemia (25%), thrombocytopenia (20%), headache (20%), cough (19%), leukopenia (17%), constipation (17%), arthralgia (15%), dry mouth (14%), weight decreased (14%), stomatitis (14%), creatinine increased (13%), alopecia (12%), dysgeusia (12%), pyrexia (11%), dizziness (11%), and dehydration (10%).

The most frequently reported ≥5% Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions that occurred in the Verzenio arm vs the placebo arm of MONARCH 3 were neutropenia (22% vs 2%), diarrhea (9% vs 1%), leukopenia (8% vs <1%), ALT increased (7% vs 2%), and anemia (6% vs 1%).

The most frequently reported ≥5% Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions that occurred in the Verzenio arm vs the placebo arm of MONARCH 2 were neutropenia (27% vs 2%), diarrhea (13% vs <1%), leukopenia (9% vs 0%), anemia (7% vs 1%), and infections (6% vs 3%).

The most frequently reported ≥5% Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions from MONARCH 1 with Verzenio were neutropenia (24%), diarrhea (20%), fatigue (13%), infections (7%), leukopenia (6%), anemia (5%), and nausea (5%).

Lab abnormalities (all grades; Grade 3 or 4) for MONARCH 3 in ≥10% for Verzenio plus anastrozole or letrozole and ≥2% higher than placebo plus anastrozole or letrozole vs placebo plus anastrozole or letrozole were increased serum creatinine (98% vs 84%; 2% vs 0%), decreased white blood cells (82% vs 27%; 13% vs <1%), anemia (82% vs 28%; 2% vs 0%), decreased neutrophil count (80% vs 21%; 22% vs 3%), decreased lymphocyte count (53% vs 26%; 8% vs 2%), decreased platelet count (36% vs 12%; 2% vs <1%), increased ALT (48% vs 25%; 7% vs 2%), and increased AST (37% vs 23%; 4% vs <1%).

Lab abnormalities (all grades; Grade 3 or 4) for MONARCH 2 in ≥10% for Verzenio plus fulvestrant and ≥2% higher than placebo plus fulvestrant vs placebo plus fulvestrant were increased serum creatinine (98% vs 74%; 1% vs 0%), decreased white blood cells (90% vs 33%; 23% vs 1%), decreased neutrophil count (87% vs 30%; 33% vs 4%), anemia (84% vs 33%; 3% vs <1%), decreased lymphocyte count (63% vs 32%; 12% vs 2%), decreased platelet count (53% vs 15%; 2% vs 0%), increased ALT (41% vs 32%; 5% vs 1%), and increased AST (37% vs 25%; 4% vs 4%).

Lab abnormalities (all grades; Grade 3 or 4) for MONARCH 1 were increased serum creatinine (98%; <1%), decreased white blood cells (91%; 28%), decreased neutrophil count (88%; 27%), anemia (68%; 0%), decreased lymphocyte count (42%; 14%), decreased platelet count (41%; 2%), increased ALT (31%; 3%), and increased AST (30%; 4%).

Strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors increased the exposure of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites to a clinically meaningful extent and may lead to increased toxicity. Avoid concomitant use of the strong CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole. Ketoconazole is predicted to increase the AUC of abemaciclib by up to 16-fold. In patients with recommended starting doses of 200 mg twice daily or 150 mg twice daily, reduce the Verzenio dose to 100 mg twice daily with concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors other than ketoconazole. In patients who have had a dose reduction to 100 mg twice daily due to adverse reactions, further reduce the Verzenio dose to 50 mg twice daily with concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors. If a patient taking Verzenio discontinues a strong CYP3A inhibitor, increase the Verzenio dose (after 3 to 5 half-lives of the inhibitor) to the dose that was used before starting the inhibitor. With concomitant use of moderate CYP3A inhibitors, monitor for adverse reactions and consider reducing the Verzenio dose in 50 mg decrements. Patients should avoid grapefruit products.

Avoid concomitant use of strong or moderate CYP3A inducers and consider alternative agents. Coadministration of strong or moderate CYP3A inducers decreased the plasma concentrations of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites and may lead to reduced activity.

With severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C), reduce the Verzenio dosing frequency to once daily. The pharmacokinetics of Verzenio in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min), end stage renal disease, or in patients on dialysis is unknown. No dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with mild or moderate hepatic (Child-Pugh A or B) and/or renal impairment (CLcr ≥30-89 mL/min).

Sorrento Announces Positive Results From Its License Partner, Kelun, on a Phase I Study of Safety and Pharmacokinetics of A166, a Novel HER2 ADC for Advanced HER2 Positive Breast Cancers

On June 4, 2021 Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: SRNE, "Sorrento") reported that Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ("Kelun"), a license and development partner, will present posters at this year’s American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) meeting to be held June 5-6, 2021, releasing Phase 1 data for its HER2-ADC, A166. To generate this site-specific third generation antibody drug conjugate (ADC), Kelun partnered with Levena Biopharma, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sorrento, which provided the patent-protected technologies for the generation and production of A166, including (1) a proprietary small molecule toxin, Duostatin-5, a tubulin inhibitor, (2) K-Lock, a site-specific conjugation technology and (3) an enzymatically cleavable linker (Press release, Sorrento Therapeutics, JUN 4, 2021, View Source [SID1234583548]). Compared to its commercial competitors, A166 demonstrated a better safety profile in the initial study and potentially better efficacy, as shown in the overall response rate (ORR) of 71.4% (A166) at 6.0 mg/kg vs DS-8201, which has an ORR of 60.9% (DS-8201) at 5.4 mg/kg.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Clinical Trial Information:

Clinical Trial Registry Number:
CTR20181301
Citation:
J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 1024)
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1024