Clinical Data Presented from PIVOT-02 Study of Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) with Nivolumab in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients at the 2019 CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference

On September 26, 2019 Nektar Therapeutics (Nasdaq: NKTR) reported a presentation of new clinical data for bempegaldesleukin (bempeg, NKTR-214) in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at the 2019 CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference (CIMT) (Free CIMT Whitepaper) in Paris, France (Press release, Nektar Therapeutics, SEP 26, 2019, View Source [SID1234539838]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Among all the breast cancer types, triple-negative breast cancer has the poorest prognosis and new treatment options are needed for our patients," said Sara M. Tolaney, M.D., MPH, Associate Director of the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. "While checkpoint inhibitors in combination with taxanes have been shown to provide survival benefit to advanced TNBC patients whose tumors are positive for PD-L1, more effective treatment combinations are needed, particularly for those patients whose tumors are PD-L1 negative."

TNBC is a type of breast cancer that tests negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and excess HER2 protein. It accounts for up to 20% of all breast cancer cases, occurring more frequently in young premenopausal women.*

"The data presented today in patients with metastatic TNBC demonstrate the promising clinical activity of bempeg plus nivolumab, most notably in patients with PD-L1 negative baseline tumors," said Mary Tagliaferri, M.D., Chief Medical Officer at Nektar Therapeutics. "Responses were prolonged and occurred in patients with multiple negative predictive factors for clinical benefit with a checkpoint inhibitor, including prior treatment with taxane therapy and multiple sites of metastases. These data support potential future development of this doublet in combination with chemotherapy in the population of TNBC patients with the highest unmet medical need."

The preliminary results from patients enrolled in the TNBC cohort in the ongoing PIVOT-02 Phase 1/2 study were shared in a poster presentation today titled, "Clinical activity of BEMPEG plus NIVO observed in metastatic TNBC: preliminary results from the TNBC cohort of the Ph1/2 PIVOT-02 study" by Sara M. Tolaney, M.D., MPH, et al.

Highlights from the CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR presentation in metastatic TNBC patients include:

Clinical Efficacy:
Investigator-assessed response measured per RECIST 1.1 for efficacy-evaluable patients treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and with ≥1 post-treatment scan as of July 1, 20191:

All patients had at least one or more poor prognostic features or negative predictive clinical factors (high LDH, # of metastatic sites, prior taxane, early relapser) for checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) benefit, including those who were baseline PD-L1 negative.2-4
Confirmed overall objective response rate (ORR) was 13% (5/38) in all efficacy-evaluable patients.5 24 of 38 efficacy-evaluable patients were relapsed/refractory to prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting (>2/3L metastatic setting). All 5 confirmed responders had received at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease prior to study entry. One patient with a confirmed partial response (PR) had a 100% reduction in RECIST target lesions and went off therapy as a result of achieving maximal clinical benefit at 20.7 months; the remaining four responders are ongoing treatment with prolonged responses.
ORR was 21% (5/24) in the >2/3L metastatic patients, with an ORR of 23% (3/13) in >2/3L metastatic patients who had a PD-L1 negative baseline tumor status.
Among the 34 patients with known pre-treatment PD-L1 status, ORR in PD-L1 negative patients was 14% (3/22) and in PD-L1 positive patients was 17% (2/12).
Disease control rate (DCR) in the overall efficacy-evaluable population was 45% (defined as complete response (CR) + PR + stable disease (SD)).
In patients with RECIST response, no patients discontinued due to disease progression.
Clinical Safety:

The combination of bempegaldesleukin and nivolumab was well tolerated, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar to what was previously reported. A total of 26%(11/43) patients experienced a Grade 3/4 TRAE, with 2 patients discontinuing due to a TRAE. The most common Grade 3/4 TRAEs were dehydration (4.7%), hypotension (4.7%), and myalgia (4.7%).
A copy of Dr. Tolaney’s poster presentation of PIVOT-02 data is available on Nektar’s corporate website at View Source
Analyst Call with Nektar Management and Breast Cancer Specialist, Dr. Sara Tolaney of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Nektar will webcast an analyst conference call today, Thursday, September 26, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. CEST. The conference call may be accessed by dialing 877-881-2183 (toll-free) or 970-315-0453 (international) with the conference call passcode 1998093. The webcast and slides for the conference call can be accessed through a link posted on the Investors section of the Nektar website at View Source The webcast of the conference call will be available for replay through December 26, 2019.

About Bempegaldesleukin (Bempeg, NKTR-214)
Bempeg is an investigational, first-in-class, CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist designed to provide rapid activation and proliferation of cancer-killing immune cells, known as CD8+ effector T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, without over activating the immune system. The agent is designed to stimulate these cancer-killing immune cells in the body by targeting CD122 specific receptors found on the surface of these immune cells. CD122, which is also known as the Interleukin-2 receptor beta subunit, is a key signaling receptor that is known to increase proliferation of these effector T cells.6 In clinical and preclinical studies, treatment with bempegaldesleukin resulted in expansion of these cells and mobilization into the tumor micro-environment.7,8 Bempegaldesleukin has an antibody-like dosing regimen similar to the existing checkpoint inhibitor class of approved medicines.

PDL BioPharma to Participate in the 2019 Cantor Fitzgerald Global Healthcare Conference

On September 26, 2019 PDL BioPharma, Inc. ("PDL" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PDLI) reported that Dominique Monnet, PDL’s president and chief executive officer, will present at the 2019 Cantor Fitzgerald Global Healthcare Conference on Friday, October 4, 2019, at 1:10 p.m. Eastern time (10:10 a.m. Pacific time) (Press release, PDL BioPharma, SEP 26, 2019, View Source [SID1234539836]). The conference is being held at the Intercontinental New York Barclay Hotel.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

To access the live and subsequently archived webcast of the presentation, visit the Company’s website at View Source, go to the Investor Relations section and select "Events & Presentations." Please connect to the website at least 15 minutes prior to the presentation to allow for any software download that may be necessary. The archived webcast will be available for at least seven days following the presentation.

Vigeo Therapeutics to Present Results from Its Phase 1 Study Evaluating VT1021 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2019 Congress

On September 26, 2019 Vigeo Therapeutics, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel therapeutics to reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), reported that data from its Phase 1 study evaluating VT1021 in patients with advanced solid tumors will be presented at a poster session at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2019 Congress, September 27-October 1 in Barcelona, Spain (Press release, Vigeo Therapeutics, SEP 26, 2019, View Source [SID1234539835]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Vigeo is developing therapies that target the TIME via induction of thrombospondin-1 (Tsp-1) by replicating the biological activity of prosaposin (Psap). Tsp-1 is a naturally occurring, potent anti-tumorigenic protein that has been shown to reprogram the TIME and block tumor growth and progression.

"The more we study VT1021 in the clinic, the more reason we have to believe that it may significantly benefit patients by prolonging stable diseases and shrinking target lesions," said Jing Watnick, Ph.D., M.B.A., chief executive officer of Vigeo. "We look forward to initiating the expansion cohorts, in which patients will be enrolled based on tumor types and CD36 expression. This will help us understand the safety and efficacy of VT1021 in selected indications, including but not limited to ovarian cancer, triple negative breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and glioblastoma."

VT1021 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
The dose escalation phase of the first-in-human study with VT1021 is near completion. Through the first eight dose levels tested, VT1021 has been shown to be safe and well tolerated, with no serious drug-related adverse events. Enrollment for expansion cohorts in specific tumor types is expected to begin in the fourth quarter of 2019.

"The data continue to suggest that Vigeo’s VT1021 is safe and well tolerated, and Tsp-1 induction has been observed both in circulation and in the tumor microenvironment. This confirms VT1021’s pharmacodynamic effect, which initiates the reprogramming of the TIME from one that is tumor-promoting to one that activates the immune system and is tumor-inhibiting," said Gregory Berk, MD, chief medical officer of Vigeo.

Presentation information is as follows:

Session Type: Poster Session
Title: A Phase 1 open label dose escalation trial evaluating VT1021 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Session: Developmental Therapeutics and Tumor Biology
Abstract: #2683
Date & Time: Saturday September 28, 2019 from 12:00PM to 1:00PM CET
Location: 456P
Presenter: Michael Cieslewicz, Ph.D., Vice President, Program Management and Operations, Vigeo Therapeutics

About VT1021
Vigeo’s lead molecule, VT1021, is a small peptide agent derived from Psap that triggers Tsp-1 production, reprogramming the tumor microenvironment and making it inhospitable for tumor growth. Pre-clinical results have demonstrated that VT1021, when administered systemically, can cause tumor regression in animal models at both the primary and metastatic sites. VT1021 is currently being evaluated in a Phase 1, open label, multicenter trial that assesses the drug’s safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy. The trial’s dose escalation phase was launched in late 2017, and the expansion phase will begin in the fourth quarter of 2019. An interim readout is expected in the second half of 2020.

Luminex Corporation to Present at the Cantor Global Healthcare Conference on October 2, 2019

On September 26, 2019 Luminex Corporation (NASDAQ: LMNX) reported that Homi Shamir, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Harriss Currie, Senior Vice President of Finance and CFO, will participate in investor meetings and present at the Cantor Global Healthcare Conference on Wednesday, October 2, 2019 in New York, NY (Press release, Luminex, SEP 26, 2019, View Source [SID1234539834]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

A live webcast of Luminex’s presentation will be available at 1:50 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 2nd and may be accessed at Luminex Corporation’s website at www.luminexcorp.com. Simply log on to the web at the address above, go to the About Company section and access the Investor Relations link. The presentation will be archived for six months on the website using the ‘replay’ link.

Janssen Announces U.S. FDA Approval of DARZALEX® (daratumumab) Combination Regimen for Newly Diagnosed, Transplant-Eligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma

On September 26, 2019 The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of DARZALEX (daratumumab) in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd) for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, SEP 26, 2019, View Source [SID1234539833]). The approval is based on results from the Phase 3 CASSIOPEIA (MMY3006) study that showed the addition of DARZALEX to VTd before and after ASCT resulted in deeper responses, as indicated by the higher stringent complete response (sCR) rate, and improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to VTd alone.1 The approval comes after the FDA granted Priority Review for the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"The pivotal Phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study is one of the largest transplant studies ever conducted in multiple myeloma, and the largest study conducted with daratumumab," said Philippe Moreau, M.D., principal investigator and Head of the Hematology Department at the University Hospital of Nantes, France. "It’s important that patients get a deep response from their frontline therapy, and CASSIOPEIA demonstrates that the addition of daratumumab to VTd before and after transplant markedly increased depth of response compared to VTd alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."

Data from the Phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study were first presented at the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in The Lancet. Additionally, updates from the study were recently presented at the 17th International Myeloma Workshop Meeting. CASSIOPEIA is a two-part, Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) study in collaboration with the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology (HOVON) and Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Results from this first part of the trial showed that the primary endpoint of sCR rate post consolidation was significantly higher in the DARZALEX-VTd arm compared to VTd alone (29 percent vs. 20 percent) (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.60; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.21–2.12; P=0.0010).1 The addition of DARZALEX to VTd at a median follow-up of 18.8 months resulted in a 53 percent reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared to VTd alone (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.47; 95 percent CI, 0.33–0.67; P<0.0001).1

"We are thrilled that newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma and their doctors have a new option with this combination," said Paul Giusti, President and CEO of the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF). "The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation and Janssen share a mutual focus on accelerating development of new effective treatment options for patients. We are grateful for Janssen’s continued commitment to myeloma patients and their families."

After consolidation, DARZALEX-VTd also increased the rate of complete response or better (39 percent vs. 26 percent) (OR = 1.82; 95 percent CI, 1.40-2.36) and very good partial response or better (83 percent vs. 78 percent) (OR = 1.41; 95 percent CI, 1.04-1.92) compared to VTd alone, respectively.1

"The DARZALEX clinical development program has led to many important firsts, but more importantly, it has generated key insights and understanding into the biology and treatment of multiple myeloma," said Craig Tendler, M.D., Vice President, Clinical Development and Global Medical Affairs, Oncology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC. "Today’s milestone marks the seventh FDA approval in less than four years for DARZALEX, and the third for newly diagnosed patients. Yet our work is far from over, as we are committed to discovering and developing innovative treatments like DARZALEX for the benefit of patients facing a multiple myeloma diagnosis."

The most frequent adverse reactions (>20 percent with at least 5 percent greater frequency in the DARZALEX-VTd group) were infusion reactions, nausea, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection and bronchitis.1 Serious adverse reactions with a 2 percent greater incidence in the DARZALEX-VTd arm compared to the VTd arm were bronchitis (2 percent vs. <1 percent) and pneumonia (6 percent vs. 4 percent), respectively.1 In the DARZALEX-VTd combination arm, infusion-related reactions occurred in 35 percent of patients.1

This news comes on the heels of the second approval of DARZALEX for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who are transplant-ineligible, based on the Phase 3 MAIA study.

About the CASSIOPEIA Study1
This randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study is sponsored by the French Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) in collaboration with the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology (HOVON) and Janssen Research & Development, LLC. The study included 1,085 newly diagnosed patients with previously untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma who were eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant (median age is 58). In the first part of the study, patients were randomized to receive induction treatment with VTd alone or in combination with DARZALEX, high-dose therapy and ASCT, and consolidation therapy with VTd alone or in combination with DARZALEX. The primary endpoint in this part of the study is the proportion of patients who achieve a sCR at the end of consolidation therapy. In the second part of the study, which is ongoing, patients who achieved a partial response or better in part one underwent a second randomization to receive maintenance treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg every eight weeks for up to two years or be observed with no further treatment. The primary endpoint in this part of the study is PFS.

About DARZALEX (daratumumab)
DARZALEX (daratumumab), the first CD38-directed antibody approved anywhere in the world, is the only CD38-directed antibody approved to treat multiple myeloma.1 CD38 is a surface protein that is present in high numbers on multiple myeloma cells, regardless of the stage of disease.2 DARZALEX binds to CD38 and inhibits tumor cell growth causing myeloma cell death.1 DARZALEX may also have an effect on normal cells.1 DARZALEX is being evaluated in a comprehensive clinical development program across a range of treatment settings in multiple myeloma, such as in frontline and relapsed settings.3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Additional studies are ongoing or planned to assess its potential in other malignant and pre-malignant hematologic diseases in which CD38 is expressed, such as smoldering myeloma.11,12

In the U.S., DARZALEX received initial FDA approval in November 2015 as a monotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least three prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent, or who are double refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory agent.13 DARZALEX received additional approvals in November 2016 in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, or bortezomib and dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy.14 In June 2017, DARZALEX received approval in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a PI.15 In May 2018, DARZALEX received approval in combination with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for ASCT, making it the first monoclonal antibody approved for newly diagnosed patients with this disease.16 In June 2019, DARZALEX received approval in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant ineligible.17

In August 2012, Janssen Biotech, Inc. entered into a global license and development agreement with Genmab A/S, which granted Janssen an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize DARZALEX.18 For the full U.S. Prescribing Information, please visit www.DARZALEX.com.

About Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is an incurable blood cancer that affects a type of white blood cell called plasma cells, which are found in the bone marrow.19,20 When damaged, these plasma cells rapidly spread and replace normal cells with tumors in the bone marrow.20,21 In 2019, it is estimated that 32,110 people will be diagnosed and 12,960 will die from the disease in the U.S. 21 While some patients with multiple myeloma have no symptoms, most patients are diagnosed due to symptoms, which can include bone fracture or pain, low red blood counts, tiredness, high calcium levels, kidney problems or infections. 22

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION1

CONTRAINDICATIONS
DARZALEX (daratumumab) is contraindicated in patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity (eg, anaphylactic reactions) to daratumumab or any of the components of the formulation.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Infusion Reactions – DARZALEX can cause severe and/or serious infusion reactions, including anaphylactic reactions. In clinical trials, approximately half of all patients experienced an infusion reaction. Most infusion reactions occurred during the first infusion and were Grade 1-2. Infusion reactions can also occur with subsequent infusions. Nearly all reactions occurred during infusion or within 4 hours of completing DARZALEX. Prior to the introduction of post-infusion medication in clinical trials, infusion reactions occurred up to 48 hours after infusion. Severe reactions have occurred, including bronchospasm, hypoxia, dyspnea, hypertension, laryngeal edema, and pulmonary edema. Signs and symptoms may include respiratory symptoms, such as nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, as well as chills, vomiting, and nausea. Less common symptoms were wheezing, allergic rhinitis, pyrexia, chest discomfort, pruritus, and hypotension.

Pre-medicate patients with antihistamines, antipyretics, and corticosteroids. Frequently monitor patients during the entire infusion. Interrupt infusion for reactions of any severity and institute medical management as needed. Permanently discontinue therapy if an anaphylactic reaction or life-threatening (Grade 4) reaction occurs and institute appropriate emergency care. For patients with Grade 1, 2, or 3 reactions, reduce the infusion rate when re-starting the infusion.

To reduce the risk of delayed infusion reactions, administer oral corticosteroids to all patients following DARZALEX infusions. Patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may require additional post-infusion medications to manage respiratory complications. Consider prescribing short- and long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Interference With Serological Testing – Daratumumab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and results in a positive Indirect Antiglobulin Test (Indirect Coombs test). Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect antiglobulin test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab infusion. Daratumumab bound to RBCs masks detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient’s serum. The determination of a patient’s ABO and Rh blood type are not impacted. Notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with serological testing and inform blood banks that a patient has received DARZALEX. Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX.

Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia – DARZALEX may increase neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to the manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. DARZALEX dose delay may be required to allow recovery of neutrophils and/or platelets. No dose reduction of DARZALEX is recommended. Consider supportive care with growth factors for neutropenia or transfusions for thrombocytopenia.

Interference With Determination of Complete Response – Daratumumab is a human IgG kappa monoclonal antibody that can be detected on both the serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein. This interference can impact the determination of complete response and of disease progression in some patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein.

Adverse Reactions – The most frequently reported adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) were: infusion reactions, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, asthenia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, decreased appetite, vomiting, muscle spasms, arthralgia, back pain, pyrexia, chills, dizziness, insomnia, cough, dyspnea, peripheral edema, peripheral sensory neuropathy, bronchitis, pneumonia and upper respiratory tract infection.

DARZALEX in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd): The most frequent (≥20%) adverse reactions for newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory patients were, respectively, infusion reactions (41%, 48%), diarrhea (57%, 43%), nausea (32%, 24%), fatigue (40%, 35%), pyrexia (23%, 20%), upper respiratory tract infection (52%, 65%), muscle spasms (29%, 26%), dyspnea (32%, 21%), and cough (30%, 30%). In newly diagnosed patients, constipation (41%), peripheral edema (41%), back pain (34%), asthenia (32%), bronchitis (29%), pneumonia (26%), decreased appetite (22%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (24%) were also reported. In newly diagnosed patients, serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to Rd) were dehydration (2%), bronchitis (4%), and pneumonia (15%), and treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were leukopenia (35%), neutropenia (56%), and lymphopenia (52%). In relapsed/refractory patients, serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to Rd) were pneumonia (12%), upper respiratory tract infection (7%), influenza (3%), and pyrexia (3%), and treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were neutropenia (53%) and lymphopenia (52%).

DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (DVMP): The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were upper respiratory tract infection (48%), infusion reactions (28%), and peripheral edema (21%). Serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to the VMP arm) were pneumonia (11%), upper respiratory tract infection (5%), and pulmonary edema (2%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (58%), neutropenia (44%), and thrombocytopenia (38%).

DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd): The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (47%), infusion reactions (45%), upper respiratory tract infection (44%), diarrhea (32%), cough (27%), peripheral edema (22%), and dyspnea (21%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 42%. Serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to Vd) were upper respiratory tract infection (5%), diarrhea (2%), and atrial fibrillation (2%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (48%) and thrombocytopenia (47%).

DARZALEX in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (DVTd): The most frequent adverse reactions (≥20%) were infusion reactions (35%), nausea (30%), upper respiratory tract infection (27%), pyrexia (26%), and bronchitis (20%). Serious adverse reactions (≥2% compared to the VTd arm) were bronchitis (DVTd 2% vs VTd <1%) and pneumonia (DVTd 6% vs VTd 4%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (59%), neutropenia (33%), and leukopenia (24%).

DARZALEX in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd): The most frequent adverse reactions (>20%) were fatigue (50%), infusion reactions (50%), upper respiratory tract infection (50%), cough (43%), diarrhea (38%), constipation (33%), dyspnea (33%), nausea (30%), muscle spasms (26%), back pain (25%), pyrexia (25%), insomnia (23%), arthralgia (22%), dizziness (21%), and vomiting (21%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 49%. Serious adverse reactions reported in ≥5% of patients included pneumonia (7%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were anemia (30%), neutropenia (82%), and lymphopenia (71%).

DARZALEX as monotherapy: The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were infusion reactions (48%), fatigue (39%), nausea (27%), back pain (23%), pyrexia (21%), cough (21%), and upper respiratory tract infection (20%). The overall incidence of serious adverse reactions was 33%. The most frequent serious adverse reactions were pneumonia (6%), general physical health deterioration (3%), and pyrexia (3%). Treatment-emergent Grade 3-4 hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) were lymphopenia (40%) and neutropenia (20%).