Priority Review Granted to PD-L1/4-1BB Bispecific Antibody Opamtistomig, Accelerating Commercialization and Addressing Unmet Need in EP-NEC

On July 10, 2026 Nanjing Leads Biolabs Co., Ltd. ("Leads Biolabs" or the "Company," Stock Code: 9887.HK) reported that the biologics license application (BLA) for Opamtistomig (LBL-024, a PD-L1/4-1BB bispecific antibody) as monotherapy for the treatment of advanced extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) has been approved by the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) of the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of the People’s Republic of China for inclusion in the priority review and approval procedure. This BLA submission is based on the positive results from a pivotal registrational clinical study led by Professor Shen Lin of Peking University Cancer Hospital, which was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Opamtistomig in patients with advanced EP-NEC whose disease had progressed following two or more prior lines of systemic therapy.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Under the relevant PRC regulations, the review timeline for a BLA included in the priority review and approval procedure is 130 working days, as compared with 200 working days under the ordinary review procedure. The inclusion of Opamtistomig in the priority review process represents a key milestone toward its commercialization, providing clarity and visibility on its expected approval timeline. The Company is actively advancing relevant pre-launch commercialization preparations.

Executive Commentary

Dr. Charles Cai, Chief Medical Officer of Leads Biolabs, stated: "The differentiated mechanism of Opamtistomig is translating into broad clinical value validation across multiple indications. Beginning with EP-NEC, a highly aggressive immune-cold tumor for which no globally approved therapy currently exists, and extending to larger indications such as NSCLC and BTC, we have strategically and systematically built a comprehensive clinical development program. Across these indications, we continue to observe meaningful survival benefits and encouraging efficacy signals. We remain committed to accelerating the clinical development of Opamtistomig and unlocking its full potential as a next-generation cornerstone immunotherapy."

Dr. Xiaoqiang Kang, Founder, Chairman, CEO of Leads Biolabs, added: "The inclusion of Opamtistomig’s BLA in China’s priority review is a pivotal step in Leads Biolabs’ transition toward commercialization. This milestone not only reflects our decade-long commitment to differentiated innovation, but also underscores the regulatory authorities’ strong emphasis on addressing unmet medical needs. We will work closely with the CDE throughout the review process and strive to bring this innovative therapy to patients as quickly as possible."

About EP-NEC

EP-NEC is a highly aggressive immunologically cold tumor for which no therapy has been approved by any regulatory authority worldwide. Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced EP-NEC, with a median overall survival (mOS) of approximately one year. However, there are no effective treatment options following progression on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. For patients who have received two or more prior lines of systemic therapy, currently available later-line treatment options provide very limited clinical benefit, with reported objective response rates (ORR) ranging from 0% to 10% and a mOS of only three to four months. As such, EP-NEC represents an area of substantial unmet medical need, underscoring the urgent need for new and effective treatment approaches.

About Opamtistomig

Opamtistomig (LBL-024) is emerging as a next-generation pan-cancer backbone therapy with potential overall survival (OS) benefit that simultaneously targets PD-L1 and the co-stimulatory receptor 4-1BB. Developed using Leads Biolabs’ proprietary X-Body bispecific platform, Opamtistomig is designed to simultaneously block PD-1/L1 immune suppression and conditionally activate 4-1BB, an agonist pathway, resulting in a potent and synergistic anti-tumor immune response. It has a safety profile comparable to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and demonstrates broader-spectrum anti-cancer potential. To date, Opamtistomig has demonstrated first- or best-in-class potential in Phase II or registrational clinical trials across four indications: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), biliary tract cancer (BTC), and extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC).

As the first 4-1BB–targeting bispecific antibody globally to advance to a single-arm pivotal trial as monotherapy, Opamtistomig has been evaluated in 13 solid tumor indications in China, including 1 pivotal registration trial and 8 proof-of-concept studies. These cover EP-NEC, NSCLC, SCLC, BTC, ovarian cancer (OC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gastric cancer (GC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), malignant melanoma, and other areas with high unmet medical needs.

Mechanistically, 4-1BB agonism can reactivate exhausted T cells and promote robust T-cell proliferation, offering significant promise for PD-1/PD-L1–resistant or immunologically "cold" tumors. Recognizing its clinical potential, Opamtistomig received Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) from China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in October 2024, and Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma in November 2024. Additionally, in January 2026, Opamtistomig was granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) by the FDA and ODD by the European Commission for the treatment of EP-NEC, further underscoring its potential to address unmet medical needs in this patient population.

(Press release, Nanjing Leads Biolabs, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669143])

FDA Approves KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) and KEYTRUDA QLEX™ (pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph), Each With Padcev® (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv), as Treatment Before and After Surgery for Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)

On July 10, 2026 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside of the United States and Canada, reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) and KEYTRUDA QLEX (pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph), Merck’s anti-PD-1 therapies, each in combination with Padcev (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv), as neoadjuvant treatment and then continued after cystectomy as adjuvant treatment for the treatment of adult patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). These approvals represent the first and only PD-1 inhibitor plus antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) regimens approved for adults with MIBC regardless of cisplatin eligibility.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These approvals are based on data from the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-B15 trial (also known as EV-304), which was conducted in collaboration with Pfizer and Astellas and enrolled 808 patients. They also expand the previously approved indication based on the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-905 trial (also known as EV-303) for KEYTRUDA and KEYTRUDA QLEX, each in combination with Padcev, in the U.S. as treatment before and after surgery for adult patients with MIBC who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

In KEYNOTE-B15, KEYTRUDA plus Padcev, given before and after surgery, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS), reducing the risk of EFS events (defined as disease progression, recurrence or death) by 47% (HR=0.53 [95% CI, 0.41-0.70]; p<0.0001; 87/405 [21%] versus 146/403 [36%]) in patients with MIBC who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) and surgery. Median EFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, NR-NR) for perioperative KEYTRUDA plus Padcev versus 48.5 months (95% CI, 43.3-NR) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. KEYTRUDA plus Padcev also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS), reducing the risk of death by 35% (HR=0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.89]; p=0.0029; 69/405 [17%] versus 99/403 [25%]) in these patients when compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Median OS was NR (95% CI, NR-NR) for either regimen. The trial showed KEYTRUDA plus Padcev demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (55.8% [95% CI: 50.8, 60.7] versus 32.5% [95% CI: 28.0, 37.3]; p<0.0001). The effectiveness of KEYTRUDA QLEX for its approved indications has been established based upon evidence from the adequate and well-controlled studies conducted with KEYTRUDA and additional data from MK-3475A-D77 comparing the pharmacokinetic, efficacy and safety profiles of KEYTRUDA QLEX and KEYTRUDA.

KEYTRUDA QLEX is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to berahyaluronidase alfa, hyaluronidase or to any of its excipients. KEYTRUDA and KEYTRUDA QLEX are associated with the following Warnings and Precautions: severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions in any or multiple organs, which can occur during or after treatment, including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies, nephritis, dermatologic reactions, solid organ transplant rejection, other transplant (including corneal graft) rejection; severe and life-threatening infusion or injection-related reactions; fatal and other serious complications in patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation before or after beginning treatment; embryo-fetal toxicity; and increased mortality in patients with multiple myeloma when KEYTRUDA or KEYTRUDA QLEX is added to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone, which is not recommended outside of controlled trials. Immune-mediated adverse reactions listed here may not include all such possible severe or fatal reactions. For more information, see "Selected Safety Information" below.

"Today’s FDA approvals represent a meaningful development for patients who have muscle-invasive bladder cancer, as nearly half of these patients experience disease recurrence following bladder removal surgery," said Dr. Matthew Galsky, Lillian and Howard Stratton professor of medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, director of genitourinary medical oncology, Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center. "This shift away from traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which has been recommended for eligible patients for more than 20 years, provides important new treatment options for individuals with muscle-invasive bladder cancer regardless of cisplatin eligibility."

"We’re expanding the use of KEYTRUDA and KEYTRUDA QLEX, each in combination with Padcev, for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy with these approvals," said Dr. Marjorie Green, senior vice president and head of oncology, global clinical development, Merck Research Laboratories. "The results from KEYNOTE-B15, together with KEYNOTE-905, highlight the potential of these new treatment options for patients regardless of cisplatin eligibility in the perioperative setting and mark a promising step forward in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer."

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-B15 supporting this approval

KEYNOTE-B15, also known as EV-304, is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, active-control Phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04700124) evaluating perioperative KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and surgery (radical cystectomy [RC] and pelvic lymph node dissection [PLND]) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) and surgery in patients with previously untreated MIBC who are eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The trial enrolled 808 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either:

Neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg intravenously on Day 1 and Padcev 1.25 mg/kg intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles prior to surgery, followed by adjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 13 cycles and adjuvant Padcev 1.25 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for five cycles (n=405), or;
Neoadjuvant gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles prior to surgery, followed by observation (n=403).
The major efficacy outcome measure was EFS as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of the following events: disease progression preventing curative surgery, failure to undergo surgery for participants with muscle invasive residual disease, incomplete surgical resection, local or distant recurrence after surgery or death. Additional efficacy outcome measures were OS and pCR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathology review.

Treatment continued until completion of study medications, disease progression, not undergoing or refusal of RC and PLND, disease recurrence in the adjuvant phase or unacceptable toxicity. Assessment of tumor status, including CT/MRI, was performed at baseline, within five weeks prior to RC and PLND, and at six weeks post-RC. Following RC and PLND, assessment of tumor status, including cystoscopy and urine cytology for patients who did not undergo surgery, was performed every 12 weeks up to two years and every 24 weeks thereafter.

A total of 351 (87%) patients receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and 361 (90%) patients receiving gemcitabine with cisplatin underwent RC and PLND. A total of 25 (6%) of patients in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm received adjuvant nivolumab.

The trial was not designed to isolate the effect of KEYTRUDA in each phase (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) of treatment.

For the 403 patients who received KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase, the median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 2.1 months (range: 1 day to 3.9 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was four (range: 1 to 4) out of the planned four cycles in the neoadjuvant phase. For the 262 patients randomized to receive KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and who received any adjuvant treatment, 249 patients received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 8.3 months (range: 1 day to 18.9 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was 13 (range: 1 to 13) out of the planned 13 cycles for patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. Across the combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases (n=403), the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was 10 (range: 1 to 17) out of the planned 17 cycles.

In the neoadjuvant phase of KEYNOTE-B15, serious adverse reactions occurred in 27% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev. The most frequent (≥1.5%) serious adverse reactions were rash (3.2%), pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD) (2.2%) and diarrhea (1.7%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1.7% of patients, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (0.5%) and COVID-19 pneumonia, cardiac arrest, pneumonia, septic shock and urosepsis (0.2% each). Additional fatal adverse reactions were reported in two patients in the post-surgery phase before adjuvant treatment started, including pneumonia and sepsis (one patient each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase due to an adverse reaction occurred in 17% of patients. The most frequent (>1%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were rash (2.2%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and pneumonitis/ILD (1.7% each) and hepatitis (1.2%).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase occurred in 29% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were rash (8%), increased ALT (3.7%), neutropenia (3.2%) and hyperglycemia (2.5%). Of the 403 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev, 13 patients (3.2%) did not receive surgery due to adverse reactions. The adverse reactions that led to cancellation of surgery were multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (0.5%) and adenocarcinoma of colon, COVID-19 pneumonia, cardiac arrest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, glomerulonephritis, immune-mediated lung disease, myocarditis, pneumonia, pneumonitis and urosepsis (0.2% each).

Of the 351 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and underwent RC, 26 (7%) patients experienced delay of surgery (defined as time from last neoadjuvant treatment to surgery exceeding eight weeks) due to adverse reactions.

In the adjuvant phase of KEYNOTE-B15, serious adverse reactions occurred in 35% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase; the most frequent (≥1.5%) serious adverse reactions were urinary tract infection (8%), sepsis (2.8%), diarrhea, hyperglycemia and pneumonitis/ILD (1.6% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.2% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase, including death (0.8%) and cardiac arrest, duodenal ulcer perforation, acute pancreatitis, renal failure, small cell lung cancer and toxic shock syndrome (0.4% each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA due to an adverse reaction occurred in 23% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most frequent (>1%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were diarrhea and pneumonitis/ILD (2.4% each), rash (2%), and hyperglycemia and sepsis (1.2% each).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase occurred in 39% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were diarrhea (6%), urinary tract infection (5%), COVID-19 (3.6%), rash (2.8%) and nausea (2%).

Study design and additional data from KEYNOTE-905 supporting the previous approval

KEYNOTE-905, also known as EV-303, is an open-label, randomized, multi-arm, controlled Phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03924895) evaluating perioperative KEYTRUDA, with or without Padcev, versus surgery alone in patients with MIBC who are either not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The trial was conducted in collaboration with Pfizer and Astellas and enrolled 344 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either:

Neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg intravenously on Day 1 and Padcev 1.25 mg/kg intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for three cycles prior to surgery, followed by adjuvant KEYTRUDA 200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 14 cycles and adjuvant Padcev 1.25 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for six cycles (n=170).
Immediate RC and PLND alone (n=174).
The major efficacy outcome measure was EFS as assessed by BICR, defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of the following events: disease progression preventing curative surgery, failure to undergo surgery for participants with muscle invasive residual disease, incomplete surgical resection, local or distant recurrence after surgery or death. Overall survival and pCR rate as assessed by blinded independent pathology review were additional efficacy outcome measures.

In KEYNOTE-905, KEYTRUDA plus Padcev, given before and after surgery, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in EFS, reducing the risk of EFS events by 60% (HR=0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.57]; p<0.0001; 48/170 [28%] versus 95/174 [55%]) compared to surgery alone in patients with MIBC who are not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Median EFS was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 37.3-NR) for perioperative KEYTRUDA plus Padcev versus 15.7 months (95% CI, 10.3-20.5) for surgery alone. KEYTRUDA plus Padcev also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS, reducing the risk of death by 50% (HR=0.50 [95% CI, 0.33-0.74]; p=0.0002; 38/170 [22%] versus 68/174 [39%]) in these patients when compared to surgery alone. Median OS was NR (95% CI, NR-NR) for the regimen containing KEYTRUDA plus Padcev compared to 41.7 months (95% CI, 31.8-NR) for surgery alone. The trial showed KEYTRUDA plus Padcev demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in pCR rate compared to surgery alone (57.1% [95% CI: 49.3, 64.6] versus 8.6% [95% CI: 4.9, 13.8]; p<0.0001). The effectiveness of KEYTRUDA QLEX for its approved indications has been established based upon evidence from the adequate and well-controlled studies conducted with KEYTRUDA and additional data from MK-3475A-D77 comparing the pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety profiles of KEYTRUDA QLEX and KEYTRUDA.

A total of 149 (88%) patients in the arm receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and 156 (90%) patients in the RC and PLND alone arm underwent RC and PLND. A total of 29 (17%) of patients in the RC and PLND alone arm received adjuvant nivolumab.

The trial was not designed to isolate the effect of KEYTRUDA in each phase (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) of treatment.

Treatment continued until completion of study medications, disease progression, not undergoing or refusal of RC and PLND, disease recurrence in the adjuvant phase, or unacceptable toxicity. Assessment of tumor status, including CT/MRI, was performed at baseline, within five weeks prior to RC and PLND and at six weeks post-radical cystectomy. Following RC and PLND, assessment of tumor status, including cystoscopy and urine cytology for patients who did not undergo surgery, was performed every 12 weeks up to two years and every 24 weeks thereafter.

For the 167 patients who received KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase, the median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 1.4 months (range: 1 day to 2.7 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was three (range: 1 to 3) out of the planned three cycles in the neoadjuvant phase. For the 100 patients randomized to receive KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and who received any adjuvant treatment, 96 patients received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The median duration of exposure to KEYTRUDA 200 mg every three weeks was 8.5 months (range: 1 day to 12.9 months) and the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was 12 (range: 1 to 14) out of the planned 14 cycles for patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. Across the combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases (n=167), the median number of cycles of KEYTRUDA was five (range: 1 to 17) out of the planned 17 cycles.

In the neoadjuvant phase, serious adverse reactions occurred in 27% of patients receiving KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev. The most frequent (≥2%) serious adverse reactions were urinary tract infection (3.6%) and hematuria (2.4%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1.2% of patients, including myasthenia gravis and toxic epidermal necrolysis (0.6% each). Additional fatal adverse reactions were reported in 2.7% of patients in the post-surgery phase before adjuvant treatment started, including sepsis and intestinal obstruction (1.4% each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA due to an adverse reaction occurred in 15% of patients. The most frequent (>1%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were rash (2.4%, including generalized exfoliative dermatitis), increased ALT, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), diarrhea, dysgeusia and toxic epidermal necrolysis (1.2% each).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the neoadjuvant phase occurred in 20% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were rash (4.8%) and neutropenia (2.4%). Of the 167 patients in the KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev arm who received neoadjuvant treatment, seven (4.2%) patients did not receive surgery due to adverse reactions. The adverse reactions that led to cancellation of surgery were acute myocardial infarction, bile duct cancer, colon cancer, respiratory distress, urinary tract infection, and the two deaths due to myasthenia gravis and toxic epidermal necrolysis (0.6% each).

Of the 146 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA in combination with Padcev and underwent radical cystectomy, six (4.1%) patients experienced delay of surgery (defined as time from last neoadjuvant treatment to surgery exceeding eight weeks) due to adverse reactions.

In the adjuvant phase, serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase; the most frequent (≥2%) serious adverse reactions were urinary tract infection (8%), acute kidney injury and pyelonephritis (5% each), urosepsis (4.2%), and hypokalemia, intestinal obstruction and sepsis (2.1% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 7% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase, including urosepsis, intracranial hemorrhage, death, myocardial infarction, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and pseudomonal pneumonia (1% each).

Permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA due to an adverse reaction occurred in 29% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most frequent (>2%) adverse reactions resulting in permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA were diarrhea (5%) and peripheral neuropathy, acute kidney injury and pneumonitis (2% each).

Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase occurred in 40% of patients who received KEYTRUDA in the adjuvant phase. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of KEYTRUDA were rash (7%), urinary tract infection (6%), diarrhea (4%) and abdominal pain, COVID-19, fatigue, pruritus and pyelonephritis (2% each).

About bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide, diagnosed in more than 635,000 patients each year globally. In the U.S., it is estimated there will be more than 84,000 new cases of bladder cancer diagnosed and more than 17,000 deaths from the disease in 2026. According to some clinical practice guidelines, about 25% of newly diagnosed bladder cancer cases are MIBC. The standard of care for patients with MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery, which is shown to prolong survival. However, nearly half of patients who undergo this standard treatment experience recurrence. Additionally, up to half of patients with MIBC are not eligible to receive cisplatin and face limited treatment options, typically undergoing surgery alone.

(Press release, Merck & Co, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669141])

GSK’s licensor Hansoh Pharma announces positive phase III results for Ris-Rez in China patient population

On July 10, 2026 GSK plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK) licensor Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. reported that ARTEMIS-008, its pivotal phase III trial evaluating risvutatug rezetecan (Ris-Rez) in patients with advanced or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), met its primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). In the trial, conducted in patients in China, Ris-Rez demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in OS compared with the standard of care, topotecan. Consistent benefit was also observed across key secondary endpoints, including progression-free survival. These data will be used by Hansoh Pharma for regulatory submission in China.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

These are the first positive phase III overall survival data reported for a B7-H3-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in any tumour type. The safety profile is consistent with prior Ris-Rez findings, and no new safety signals were identified.

GSK holds exclusive global rights to develop Ris-Rez outside mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. GSK’s broad clinical development programme includes studies in lung cancer, prostate cancer and other solid tumours, including the global phase III EMBOLD SCLC-301 trial in relapsed extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with pivotal data expected next year.

Hesham Abdullah, Senior Vice President, Global Head Oncology, R&D, GSK said: "These results are an important milestone as the first positive phase III overall survival data for a B7-H3-targeted ADC in any tumour type. Together, with other data generated to date, they further support the potential of B7-H3 as a promising target across lung cancer and other solid tumours and reinforce our continued development of Ris-Rez to improve standard of care in areas of high unmet need."

Most patients with ES-SCLC relapse after initial therapy and have limited treatment options, poor prognosis and significant treatment burden.1 B7-H3 is highly expressed in SCLC tumours2,3 and the positive results from ARTEMIS-008 add to the growing body of evidence supporting the encouraging clinical activity and manageable safety profile of Ris-Rez in patients with ES-SCLC.

About risvutatug rezetecan
Ris-Rez is a novel investigational B7-H3-targeted ADC composed of a fully human anti-B7-H3 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a topoisomerase inhibitor payload. GSK acquired exclusive worldwide rights (excluding China’s mainland, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan) from Hansoh Pharma to progress clinical development and commercialisation of Ris-Rez.

Regulatory designations received for Ris-Rez to date include orphan drug designations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in SCLC and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in a category of cancer that includes SCLC, called pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma; Priority Medicines (PRIME) Designation from the EMA for relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC; and Breakthrough Therapy Designations for relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC and relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma from the US FDA.

(Press release, GlaxoSmithKline, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669140])

AB Science provides an update on its clinical program, suspending some non-priority clinical trials to focus on two clinical programs

On July 10, 2026 AB Science SA (Euronext – FR0010557264 – AB) reported an update on its clinical development program and announces the discontinuation of certain non-priority clinical studies in order to focus on two clinical programs, the AB8939 program for acute myeloid leukemia and the masitinib program for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Following the company’s press release dated April 16 [1], three clinical studies—which the company currently considers non-priority and for which patient enrollment had been suspended—are being discontinued, namely:

Phase 2 study (AB20006) of masitinib in mast cell activation syndrome
Phase 3 study (AB15003) of masitinib in mastocytosis
Phase 3 study (AB20009) of masitinib in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis

The discontinuation of these studies is not related to any safety concerns regarding masitinib. The company intends to complete these clinical studies in accordance with applicable regulations.

Stéphane Ledermann, Chairman and CEO of AB Science, stated, "This decision to terminate non-priority studies for which recruitment had been suspended and for which there is no prospect of a rapid resumption reflects compliance with regulatory requirements. It is also consistent with our commitment to allocate all necessary resources to ensure the two priority programs are carried out to the highest standards of quality."

Regarding the AB8939 program for acute myeloid leukemia, the company announced [2] the completion of Phase 1, Step 3, evaluating the combination of AB8939 and venetoclax. The next step is to seek authorization from health authorities—based on a preliminary favorable opinion from the study’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC)—to initiate Phase 4 of the study, which will evaluate the triple combination of AB8939, venetoclax, and azacitidine.

Regarding the Phase 3 program for masitinib in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which was approved in 2025 [3] but has not yet begun, the company will update the protocol and its implementation procedures, and will seek authorization from health authorities to resume this study after submitting a substantial amendment.

About AB23005 in ALS

The AB23005 study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm study conducted in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of masitinib (at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day in combination with riluzole) compared to riluzole plus placebo after 48 weeks of treatment. The study will include 408 patients (randomized in a 1:1 ratio) with ALS who are experiencing normal disease progression (i.e., a functional decline of less than 1.1 points per month) and who have not experienced a complete loss of function (i.e., a score of at least 1 on each of the 12 items of the ALSFRS-R scale). U.S. patients receiving edaravone will also be eligible to participate in the study, as the use of this medication constitutes a stratification factor.

About AB18001 in AML

The AB18001 study, titled "A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AB8939 Administered Intravenously Daily in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia," is designed in several phases. The first part is a dose-escalation study designed to assess the safety and tolerability of AB8939 and to determine the recommended dose for the Phase 2 expansion study.

The objective of the Phase 1 study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the different treatment regimens with AB8939.

Phase 1: Determination of the MTD after 3 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 alone.
Phase 2: Determination of the MTD after 14 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 alone.
Phase 3: Determination of the MTD after 14 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 in combination with venetoclax.
Phase 4: Determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after 14 consecutive days of treatment with AB8939 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine.

(Press release, AB Science, JUL 10, 2026, View Source [SID1234669139])

Amplia Announces Publication of New FAK Inhibitor Patent Application

On July 9, 2026 Amplia Therapeutics Limited (ASX:ATX; OTCQB:INNMF), ("Amplia" or the "Company"), reported publication of a new patent application describing chemically novel inhibitors of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) discovered by the Company. The patent application further expands Amplia’s FAK intellectual property portfolio and, if granted, would provide protection for the novel molecules described, and their use, out to 2046.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Amplia’s patent portfolio covers its lead drug narmafotinib, currently in clinical trials for pancreatic and ovarian cancer, and a second drug candidate (AMP886) being investigated in preclinical studies. The new patent application describes additional chemical compounds closely related to narmafotinib that also demonstrate potent and selective activity against FAK. These molecules broaden Amplia’s development pipeline and may provide future opportunities for evaluation across additional indications. Importantly, the patent application adds depth to the Company’s existing intellectual property estate around its FAK inhibitor program and supports the long-term commercial value of its development assets.

Dr. Chris Burns, CEO and Managing Director of Amplia, commented, "This patent application further strengthens our portfolio of potent FAK inhibitors and highlights the depth of innovation being generated by the Company. In addition to supporting narmafotinib, it creates future development and partnering optionality through a broader suite of novel molecules targeting this important pathway.

(Press release, Amplia Therapeutics, JUL 9, 2026, View Source [SID1234669135])