IMMUTEP PRESENTATIONS AT ASCO

On June 4, 2018 Immutep Limited (ASX: IMM; NASDAQ: IMMP) ("Immutep" or "the Company") reported to confirm that it is involved in three poster presentations at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper)‘s (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, in Chicago, Illinois taking place from 1 – 5 June (Press release, Immutep, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527167]). All three posters relate to Immutep’s lead product candidate eftilagimod alpha ("efti" or "IMP321").

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Two of the posters (TPS1050 and TPS1109), were presented on June 2, and focused on the Company’s Phase IIb AIPAC (Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel) double blind placebo trial evaluating the efficacy of efti in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The first poster discussed the results from the safety run-in phase of the AIPAC trial, which have been previously announced to the market. This poster was presented by Prof. Duhoux, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain. Specifically, it reiterated that the overall response rate ("ORR") in patients to the combination of paclitaxel and efti was 47%, and that the disease control rate ("DCR") was 87%. It also noted that two of the responses to the combination therapy occurred relatively late in the treatment (after ~6 months) and that the safety run-in phase reported a very encouraging safety profile.

The second poster, presented by Dr. Dirix of GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium, outlined the ongoing AIPAC trial, its design and primary end points.

The third poster (TPS3129) outlines the clinical trial design of the ongoing INSIGHT clinical trial, an open-labeled Phase I study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of intra-tumoral, intra-peritoneal, and subcutaneous injections with efti for advanced stage solid tumors. This is an investigator sponsored trial by Immutep’s partner, IKF in Frankfurt, Germany, which will be presented by the investigator on June 5 in Chicago.

The ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) posters regarding the Company’s AIPAC trial can be accessed via the Immutep website under the Presentations tab at:

View Source

About the AIPAC clinical trial

The ongoing AIPAC (Active Immunotherapy PAClitaxel) Phase IIb clinical trial is a European multi-centre study evaluating eftilagimod alpha ("efti" or "IMP321") in combination with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT 02614833). To date, 33 out of a planned 34 clinical sites across Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland, Hungary, United Kingdom, France and Germany are now actively recruiting and treating patients. The AIPAC study is currently expected to be fully recruited with 226 patients by the end of calendar 2018, with first Progression Free Survival data expected in calendar 2019.

About the INSIGHT clinical trial

The on-going INSIGHT Phase I clinical trial is an investigator initiated, explorative, single centre, open-label, study evaluating the feasibility and safety of intra-tumoural, intra-peritoneal, and subcutaneous injections of efti for advanced stage solid tumour entities (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03252938). The Lead Investigator of this clinical trial is Professor Doctor Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, the Medical Director of the IKF.

Dynavax Reports Data for Phase 1b/2 Trial of SD-101 in Combination with KEYTRUDA®

(pembrolizumab) in Advanced Melanoma at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology

(ASCO) Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2018 Dynavax Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ:DVAX) reported data from its ongoing Phase 1b/2 study investigating SD-101, Dynavax’s intratumoral TLR9 agonist, in combination with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), an anti-PD-1 therapy developed by Merck (known as MSD outside the United States and Canada) in patients with advanced melanoma (Press release, Dynavax Technologies, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527166]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The company reported results on a total of 69 patients comparing two doses of SD-101, £ 2mg (n=30) versus 8mg (n=39) administered by intratumoral injection. These data are being presented in poster and discussion session today at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting, in Chicago, IL. The primary endpoints of this dose-expansion/dose-finding study are safety and preliminary efficacy. The results of this study showed a 70% overall response rate (ORR) in advanced melanoma patients who received the £ 2 mg dose of SD-101 in up to four lesions versus a 38% ORR in the group receiving the 8 mg dose of SD-101 in one lesion. The combination of SD-101 and KEYTRUDA was well tolerated with adverse events related to SD-101 being transient, mild to moderate flu-like symptoms.

"These data provide further evidence of the potential for SD-101 to improve responses in first-line advanced melanoma patients in combination with an anti-PD-1 therapy," commented Eddie Gray, Chief Executive Officer. "Our studies continue to demonstrate the potential value of SD-101 across multiple tumor types. We plan to build upon this momentum and update our progress with additional data planned for a medical conference later in the year."

Highlights from Poster Presentation (Abstract #9513)

Overall response rate (ORR) of 70% (21 of 30), with a complete response (CR) rate of 17%, for advanced melanoma patients who received the £ 2 mg dose of SD-101 in up to four lesions

ORR of 38% (15 of 39) in patients who received the 8 mg dose of SD-101 in one lesion

Durable response in patients who received £ 2 mg dose of SD-101 with 74% 6-month progression free survival (PFS) rate

Observed responses in injected lesion(s) and distant lesions, including visceral metastases in the liver

Responders included 8 of 10 PD-L1 negative patients in the £ 2 mg dose cohort
AEs related to SD-101 treatment were transient, mild to moderate flu-like symptoms at both the £ 2mg and the 8 mg dosing levels

No increase in the frequency of immune-related adverse events over individual monotherapies reported in other studies1,2 nor evidence of any new safety signals
Additional details on response rates based on patient characteristics including stage of disease, ECOG score, and PD-L1 status are also included in the poster presentation which can be accessed here.

"We are moving forward with the 2mg dose of SD-101 for our Phase 3 trial which we believe is the optimal dose based on these efficacy, safety and biomarker data showing increased immune activation consistent with the biology of TLR9 activation. We continue to collect and analyze data from this trial to finalize details of the Phase 3 study design," stated Rob Janssen, Chief Medical Officer.

The details of the poster presentation and discussion session are as follows:

Phase 1b/2, open label, multicenter, study of the combination of SD-101 and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are naïve to anti-PD-1 therapy

Session Title: Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Abstract: 9513

Poster Board: 340

Poster Session Date/Time: Monday, June 4, 2018, 1:15 PM – 4:45 PM CDT

Poster Session Location: McCormick Place South, Hall A, Advanced Disease Poster Section

Discussion Session Date/Time: Monday, June 4, 2018, 4:45 PM – 6:00 PM CDT

Discussion Session Location: McCormick Place Lakeside Center, Level 4 – E451

Analyst/Investor Presentation

Today at 6:30pm CDT, Dynavax will host a presentation for analysts and investors. The presentation will be available via live webcast only and can be accessed in the "Investors and Media" section of the company’s website at www.dynavax.com.

About SYNERGY-001 (KEYNOTE-184)

SYNERGY-001, previously referred to as MEL-01, is the dose-escalation and expansion study of SD-101 in combination with KEYTRUDA which includes patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable Stage IIIC/IV melanoma. The primary endpoints of the trial are safety and preliminary efficacy of intratumoral SD-101 in combination with KEYTRUDA.

About SD-101

SD-101, the Company’s lead clinical candidate, is a proprietary, second-generation, Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist CpG-C class oligodeoxynucleotide. Dynavax is evaluating this intratumoral TLR9 agonist in several clinical studies to assess its safety and activity, including a Phase 2 study in combination with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), an anti-PD-1 therapy, in patients with advanced melanoma and in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer, in a clinical collaboration with Merck. Dynavax maintains all commercial rights to SD-101.

Daiichi Sankyo Presents Phase 3 ENLIVEN Study of Pexidartinib, Demonstrating Statistically Significant Clinical Improvement Across Multiple Endpoints in Patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor at 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2018 Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited (hereafter, Daiichi Sankyo) reported that the phase 3 ENLIVEN study showed a statistically significant 39 percent overall response rate (ORR) at week 25 based upon central review of MRI scans using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (the primary endpoint) for patients treated with oral pexidartinib compared to no tumor response among patients who received placebo (P<0.0001) (Press release, Daiichi Sankyo, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527165]). Patients enrolled in the trial were those with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) for whom surgery would be associated with potentially worse function or severe morbidity. After a median six month follow-up (longest 17 months), no responders in the ENLIVEN study had progressed. The data will be presented during an oral abstract session on Monday, June 4, 2018 between 8:24 AM – 8:36 AM CDT (Abstract 11502) at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Current treatment options for TGCT are largely limited to surgery in order to remove as much of the tumor as possible. Despite the best surgical intervention, the recurrence rate of diffuse TGCT is high and the disease may advance to the point where surgery is no longer an option," said William D. Tap, MD, lead investigator of the study and Chief of the Sarcoma Medical Oncology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. "Pexidartinib may offer a relevant treatment option for patients with TGCT, which is associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations, and for which surgery is not recommended."

Pexidartinib is an investigational, oral small molecule that potently inhibits CSF1R (colony stimulating factor-1 receptor), a primary growth driver of abnormal cells in the synovium that cause TGCT.

In the ENLIVEN study, hepatic toxicities were more frequent with pexidartinib versus placebo (AST or ALT ≥3X ULN: 33 percent, total bilirubin ≥2X ULN: 5 percent, N=61). Eight patients discontinued pexidartinib due to hepatic adverse events (AEs); four were serious nonfatal AEs with increased bilirubin, one lasting ~7 months. In non-TGCT development studies using pexidartinib, two severe liver toxicity cases (one required liver transplant, one was associated with death) were observed.

Other AEs noted in ENLIVEN >10 percent and more common with pexidartinib included hair color changes, pruritus, rash, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, fatigue, dysgeusia, facial edema, peripheral edema, periorbital edema, decreased appetite and hypertension.

Secondary efficacy endpoints demonstrated that patients treated with pexidartinib had a 56 percent overall response rate (ORR) by Tumor Volume Score (TVS), compared to no response in patients who received placebo (P<0.0001). Clinically meaningful improvement versus placebo was observed in other secondary efficacy endpoints, including range of motion (+15% vs +6%, P=0.0043), PROMIS physical function (+4.1 vs -0.9, P=0.0019), and worst stiffness (-2.5 vs -0.3, P<0.0001). There was also a nonsignificant improvement in pain response (31% vs 15%).

"We are encouraged by the results from the ENLIVEN study and we look forward to submitting an NDA to the U.S. FDA and engaging European regulators for review of pexidartinib," said Gideon Bollag, PhD, CEO, Plexxikon, a member of the Daiichi Sankyo Group."

About the ENLIVEN Study

ENLIVEN, a double-blind, randomized, global multi-cener, pivotal phase 3 study, evaluated pexidartinib in patients with symptomatic advanced TGCT for whom surgical removal of the tumor would be associated with potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity. The first part of the study, the double-blind phase, enrolled 120 patients who were randomized (1:1) to receive either pexidartinib or placebo at 1000 mg/d for 2 weeks followed by 800 mg/d for 22 weeks in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pexidartinib versus placebo. The primary endpoint of the study was the percentage of patients achieving a complete or partial response after 24 weeks of treatment (Week 25), as assessed with centrally-read MRI scans using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included range of motion, response by tumor volume score, PROMIS physical function, stiffness and measures of pain reduction.

After completing the first part of the study, patients randomized to either pexidartinib or placebo were eligible to take part in the second part of ENLIVEN, a long-term, open-label part where patients could continue to receive or start to receive pexidartinib. In October 2016, following two reported cases of serious, non-fatal liver toxicity in the ENLIVEN study, the data monitoring committee (DMC) recommended that patients receiving placebo in the first part of the study should no longer be eligible to start pexidartinib in the second part of the study. A total of 120 patients who were enrolled prior to the DMC recommendation continued with the study according to the revised protocol.

About TGCT (PVNS/GCT-TS)

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), previously referred to as pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCT-TS), is a rare, usually non-cancerous tumor that affects the synovium-lined joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths, resulting in swelling, pain, stiffness and reduced mobility in the affected joint or limb.1,2 It has been estimated that the incidence of TGCT is 11 to 50 cases per million, based on studies from three countries.3-5 Patients are commonly diagnosed in their 20s to 50s,and depending on the type of TGCT, women can be up to twice as likely to develop a tumor as men.6,7

Primary treatment of TGCT includes surgery to remove the tumor. However, in patients with a diffuse form where the tumor can wrap around bone, tendons, ligaments and other parts of the joint, it is more difficult to remove and may require multiple surgeries or joint replacement, eventually advancing to the point where surgical resection is no longer an option and amputation may be considered. It is estimated that the rate of recurrence for diffuse TGCT can be 20 to 55 percent.8

About Pexidartinib

Pexidartinib is an investigational, novel, oral small molecule that potently inhibits CSF1R (colony stimulating factor-1 receptor), which is a primary growth driver of abnormal cells in the synovium that cause TGCT. Pexidartinib also inhibits c-kit and FLT3-ITD. Pexidartinib was discovered by Plexxikon Inc., the small molecule structure-guided R&D center of Daiichi Sankyo.

Pexidartinib has been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of patients with pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) or giant cell tumor of tendon sheath (GCT-TS), where surgical resection may result in potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity and Orphan Drug Designation for PVNS/GCT-TS by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Pexidartinib also has received Orphan Designation from the European Commission for the treatment of TGCT. Pexidartinib is not approved by the FDA or any other regulatory agency worldwide as a treatment for any indication. Safety and efficacy have not been established.

Rgenix Presents Data on Phase I Clinical Activity For RGX-104 at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2018 Rgenix, Inc., a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company developing first-in-class small molecule and antibody cancer therapeutics, reported it is presenting data on the safety, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity from the dose escalation stage of the ongoing Phase Ia/b trial of RGX-104, an oral small molecule immunotherapy that targets the liver X receptor (LXR) (Press release, Rgenix, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527164]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

In a poster presentation of an abstract accepted for the 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper), "Pharmacodynamic and clinical activity of RGX-104, a first-in-class immunotherapy targeting the liver-X nuclear hormone receptor (LXR), in patients with refractory malignancies", Rgenix showed the first-in-class compound to be capable of generating immunologic and anti-tumor activity.

RGX-104 is a small-molecule LXR agonist that modulates innate immunity by activating the ApoE gene. In murine models, the small molecule depletes myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and stimulates dendritic cells (DCs), activating anti-tumor immunity as a single agent as well as in combination with adoptive T cell therapy or checkpoint inhibitors. The Phase 1a/b trial in progress is studying the therapy with regards to safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A total of 26 patients with a broad array of tumors have received RGX-104 at a range of dose levels and frequency as part of the dose escalation stage of the study.

RGX-104 was well tolerated across dose cohorts, with hyperlipidemia – an on target effect of LXR agonism – representing the most common adverse event. Robust ApoE target gene engagement was observed in patients, along with substantial MDSC depletion and DC stimulation in 12 of 17 evaluable patients. Activation of circulating PD-1+ T cells was observed in 11 of the 12 patients that experienced MDSC depletion.

One patient with a high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy with small cell features had a confirmed radiographic partial response with a 53% reduction in index hepatic metastases at the 160 mg BID dose. This response was associated with a greater than 12-fold increase in activated PD-1+ T cells. Additionally, seven patients had stable disease for durations of 8-16 weeks. The dose of 160 mg BID was chosen as the Recommended Phase 2 Dose, with robust pharmacodynamic effects on ApoE expression and relevant immune cell populations.

Masoud Tavazoie, MD, PhD, and Chief Executive Officer of Rgenix, said, "Today’s presentation illustrates the promise of our lead clinical candidate RGX-104. It enables us to move forward with our plans to study the compound in expansion cohorts as a single agent as well as in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor in patients with both checkpoint-inhibitor refractory and naïve tumors." Escalation and Expansion cohorts in the Phase 1b stage of the clinical trial are currently enrolling patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), renal cell cancer (RCC), bladder cancer (BLC), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Pierre Fabre and Its Partner Array BioPharma Announce Additional Median Overall Survival Results of Encorafenib and Binimetinib in Patients with Braf-Mutant Advanced Melanoma

On June 4, 2018 Pierre Fabre and its partner Array BioPharma Inc. reported updated results from the Phase 3 COLUMBUS trial in BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma (Press release, Array BioPharma, JUN 4, 2018, View Source [SID1234527163]). The results showed median overall survival (mOS) was 33.6 months for patients treated with the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib compared with 16.9 months for patients treated with vemurafenib as a monotherapy. The combination reduced the risk of death compared with vemurafenib monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.61 [95% CI: 0.47–0.79], p<0.0001]. The observed efficacy of vemurafenib in the control arm is also consistent with historical data, providing an additional benchmark for validating the patient population and results observed in COLUMBUS.1,2 Further, the two-year OS with the combination therapy was 58%. These results will be part of an oral presentation today at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) annual meeting in Chicago, Illinois, and have been selected for the "Best of ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)" program.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"These data indicate that regardless of treatment group, the use of subsequent immunotherapies was similar, and therefore indicate that post-trial treatments are unlikely to have contributed to the OS results we’ve seen"

Tweet this
Importantly, the presentation included data showing limited use of post-trial immunotherapy, which is consistent with other published pivotal trials of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma.1,3

"These data indicate that regardless of treatment group, the use of subsequent immunotherapies was similar, and therefore indicate that post-trial treatments are unlikely to have contributed to the OS results we’ve seen," said Professor Reinhard Dummer, University of Zurich, lead author and Vice-Chairman of the Department of Dermatology in the University Hospital of Zürich, Switzerland. "We’re pleased to present this data at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) which builds upon previous analyses of the COLUMBUS data and further support our belief that encorafenib and binimetinib could be a promising new treatment option for patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma."

Additionally, the updated median progression-free survival (mPFS) results for patients treated with the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib remained consistent with what was previously reported: 14.9 months versus 7.3 months for patients treated with vemurafenib (HR=0.51 [95% CI 0.39–0.67]; p<0.0001).

As previously reported, the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib was generally well-tolerated. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving the combination were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT; 9%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (CK; 7%) and hypertension (6%). The incidence of selected any grade AEs of special interest, defined based on toxicities commonly associated with commercially available BRAF+MEK inhibitor treatments, for patients receiving the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib included: rash (22%), serous retinopathy including retinal pigment epithelial detachment (20%), pyrexia (18%) and photosensitivity (5%). Full safety results of COLOMBUS Part 1 were published in The Lancet Oncology.

About Melanoma
Metastatic melanoma is the most serious and life-threatening type of skin cancer and is associated with low survival rates.4,5 There are about 200,000 new cases of melanoma diagnosed worldwide each year, approximately half of which have BRAF mutations, a key target in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.4,6,7,8

About COLUMBUS
The COLUMBUS trial (NCT01909453) is a two-part, international, randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib compared with vemurafenib and encorafenib monotherapy in 921 patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation. Prior immunotherapy treatment was allowed. Over 200 sites across North America, Europe, South America, Africa, Asia and Australia participated in the trial. Patients were randomized into two parts:

In Part 1, 577 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive encorafenib 450 mg daily + binimetinib 45 mg twice daily (COMBO450); encorafenib 300 mg daily (ENCO 300); or vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily as a monotherapy. The dose of encorafenib in the combination arm is 50% higher than the single-agent maximum tolerated dose of 300 mg. A higher dose of encorafenib was possible due to improved tolerability when combined with binimetinib. The primary endpoint for the COLUMBUS trial was a median progression-free survival (mPFS) comparison of the COMBO450 arm versus vemurafenib. mPFS is determined based on tumor assessment (RECIST version 1.1 criteria) by a Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints include a comparison of the mPFS of COMBO450 arm to that of ENCO300 and a comparison of overall survival (OS) in patients treated in the COMBO450 arm to that of vemurafenib alone. Results from Part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial previously published in The Lancet Oncology earlier this year (online March 2018, print May 2018), showed that COMBO450 more than doubled mPFS in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma, with a mPFS of 14.9 months compared with 7.3 months observed with vemurafenib (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.41-0.71], p<0.0001). In the secondary mPFS comparison of COMBO450 to ENCO300, ENCO300 demonstrated a mPFS of 9.6 months (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.56-1.00], p=0.051).
In Part 2, 344 patients were randomized 3:1 to receive encorafenib 300 mg daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily (COMBO300) or ENCO300. Part 2 was designed to provide additional data to help evaluate the contribution of binimetinib to the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib.
As the secondary endpoint comparison of mPFS between the COMBO450 arm and ENCO300 arm in Part 1 did not achieve statistical significance, the protocol-specified analysis of OS is descriptive.

About Encorafenib and Binimetinib
BRAF and MEK are key protein kinases in the MAPK signaling pathway (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK). Research has shown this pathway regulates several key cellular activities, including proliferation, differentiation, survival and angiogenesis. Inappropriate activation of proteins in this pathway has been shown to occur in many cancers, including melanoma and colorectal cancer. Encorafenib is a late-stage small molecule BRAF inhibitor and binimetinib is a late-stage small molecule MEK inhibitor, both of which target key enzymes in this pathway. Encorafenib and binimetinib are being studied in clinical trials in advanced cancer patients, including the Phase 3 COLUMBUS trial and the Phase 3 BEACON CRC trial.

Pierre Fabre has exclusive rights to commercialize encorafenib and binimetinib in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Australia. Pierre Fabre’s development partner, Array BioPharma, has exclusive rights in the U.S. and Canada, and has granted Ono Pharmaceutical exclusive rights to commercialize both products in Japan and South Korea. Encorafenib and binimetinib are investigational medicines and are not currently approved in any country.