Adaptimmune Announces Data from Clinical Studies of NY-ESO-1 SPEAR™ T-Cells in Multiple Cancers at the 2016 Annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Meeting

On June 05, 2016 Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc (Nasdaq:ADAP), a leader in T-cell therapy to treat cancer, reported a poster presentation of updated data on its lead clinical program, an affinity enhanced SPEAR T-cell receptor therapy targeting the NY-ESO-1 cancer antigen, in patients with advanced tumors at the 2016 Annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Meeting (Press release, Adaptimmune, JUN 5, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2175118 [SID:1234512999]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Also being presented are an overview of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients treated with NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells, and preclinical safety assessment of Adaptimmune’s next SPEAR T-cell therapy product directed at alpha fetoprotein (AFP); enrollment in a clinical trial of this AFP SPEAR T-cell therapy is expected to initiate later this year.

"Our goal is to develop our broad pipeline of targets and affinity enhanced SPEAR T-cells in an effort to develop a panel of TCR T-cell therapies to offer patients suffering from a wide variety of cancers the hope of a cure," said Dr. Rafael Amado, Adaptimmune’s Chief Medical Officer. "To that end, the clinical data described to date help clarify that our technology can be used to develop SPEAR T-cells against cancer targets that are capable of generating strong responses in the context of an acceptable benefit:risk profile. Further, we have developed and are utilizing a proprietary target validation and in vitro preclinical safety package that we believe can generate affinity enhanced TCRs against many cancers with reduced risk of safety events."

In the poster presentation entitled, "Genetically Engineered NY-ESO-1 Specific T-Cells in HLA-A:0201 positive Patients with Advanced Tumors," Crystal Mackall, M.D., Professor of Pediatrics and Medicine; Associate Director of the Stanford Cancer Institute, provided an update to the clinical experience of the NY-ESO SPEAR T-cell therapeutic in patients across cancer indications. The authors of the poster concluded:

NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells demonstrated robust clinical responses in solid and hematologic tumors, including a 50 percent (6/12) response rate in synovial sarcoma, and a 91 percent (20/22) response rate in multiple myeloma at day 100;
Preliminary data show responses to NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells in patients with low level of NY-ESO expression;
To date, no objective clinical responses have been reported in the initial patients enrolled in the ovarian cancer and melanoma cohorts. These melanoma and ovarian cancer patients were enrolled using different screening assays from those included in the synovial sarcoma and multiple myeloma studies, and did not include fludarabine in the preconditioning regimes. All patients in the melanoma study had failed prior check point inhibitor therapy. Both trials will continue to enroll patients using revised protocols with standardized NY-ESO screening and using optimized conditioning regimens. In addition, a new melanoma study protocol is being designed to incorporate standard checkpoint inhibitor therapy in combination with NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells;
NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells have been generally well tolerated with an acceptable benefit:risk profile in patients to date. The most common adverse events include rash, diarrhea, pyrexia, and fatigue. Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome was observed in four patients, which can be monitored and managed with supportive care measures;
NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells exhibited durable persistence without the requirement for IL-2 support in vivo, with cells detectable for up to three years. Additionally, NY-ESO-T cytotoxic function was detected over time without accumulation of multiple exhaustion markers. Poor persistence appears to correlate with a lack of clinical response and pre-conditioning with Cytoxan alone in the ovarian and melanoma studies.

In the poster presentation entitled, "Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in patients treated with NY-ESO-1c259 SPEAR T cells," Crystal Mackall, M.D. presented a review of CRS including evaluation of concurrent AEs and reported symptoms, cytokine levels and CRP in patients treated with NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells:

Of 53 patients treated with NY-ESO SPEAR T-cells as of January 27, 2016, eight were diagnosed with CRS: One patient was diagnosed with Grade 1, three patients with Grade 2, three patients with Grade 3 and one patient with Grade 4;
Symptoms generally manifest in the first two weeks and have been effectively managed with supportive care measures. In these patients the onset of CRS coincided with T-cell expansion, and elevated IL-6 and IL-8 were observed during CRS;
According to the authors, while there are differences in the patient populations, the incidence of CRS with NY-ESO SPEAR T-cell therapy appears to be of lower frequency and severity than reported with CD19 CAR-T therapy.

In the poster presentation entitled, "Targeting alpha fetoprotein with SPEAR T-cells in hepatocellular carcinoma," Andrew Gerry, Ph.D., Adaptimmune’s Director of Preclinical Research, presented data describing the selection and screening of a SPEAR T-cell candidate targeting AFP:

Adaptimmune’s extensive preclinical safety package comprised of molecular mapping, human cell testing, and potency testing is capable of validating TCRs with enhanced affinity for target proteins, but without marked recognition of non-cancerous tissue or safety concerns that would preclude clinical development;
Target validation results indicated that AFP could be a very attractive target for HCC, with a potential therapeutic window for the TCR to recognize highly positive hepatocellular cancer tissue without marked recognition of non-cancerous tissue;
No safety concerns were identified for AFP SPEAR T-cell reactivity, and no off-target AFP T-cell responses of concern were observed against a variety of cell types from a variety of organ systems. Alloreactivity was detected in a subset of HLA subtypes, which will be included in the exclusion criteria of the clinical study.

Adaptimmune’s SPEAR T-cell candidates are novel cancer immunotherapies that have been engineered to target and destroy cancer cells by strengthening a patient’s natural T-cell response. T-cells are a type of white blood cell that play a central role in a person’s immune response. Adaptimmune’s goal is to harness the power of the T-cell and, through its multiple therapeutic candidate, significantly impact cancer treatment and clinical outcomes of patients with solid and hematologic cancers.

Genus Oncology collaborates with leukemia research leaders on new trial for AML patients

On June 4, 2016 Genus Oncology reported that it collaborates with leaders in leukemia research at Harvard’s Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center on an investigator-initiated Phase 1b/2a trial of GO-203 in combination with Decitabine for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory AML (Press release, Genus Oncology, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:SID1234515226]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!


New KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) Data from KEYNOTE-010 and KEYNOTE-001 in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Including Survival Data, To Be Presented at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On June 4, 2016 Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, reported new data, including updated response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), the company’s anti-PD-1 therapy, as a monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 from two studies: KEYNOTE-010 and KEYNOTE-001 (Press release, Merck & Co, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513113]). The findings are being presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago (Abstracts #9015 and #9026).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

A sub-analysis from the phase 2/3 KEYNOTE-010 trial includes OS data with KEYTRUDA compared to chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC based on varying levels of PD-L1 expression; other data from KEYNOTE-010 are currently under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are intended to serve as the basis for the full approval of KEYTRUDA in lung cancer in patients whose tumors express PD-L1. Additionally, updated findings from the phase 1b KEYNOTE-001 trial, the study that supported the accelerated approval of KEYTRUDA in NSCLC, include overall response rate (ORR), PFS, safety and two-year survival data.

"We are particularly excited by the results we are seeing with KEYTRUDA in lung cancer from both studies including longer term follow-up data in KEYNOTE-001 that continues to demonstrate durable responses in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients," said Dr. Roger Dansey, senior vice president and therapeutic area head, oncology late-stage development, Merck Research Laboratories. "The KEYNOTE-010 data show that there is a correlation between increased levels of PD-L1 expression and improved benefit, which further underscores the importance of understanding a patient’s PD-L1 expression when determining a specific treatment plan."

Merck has a robust clinical development program for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in lung cancer, with five registration-enabling studies currently underway. The KEYTRUDA clinical development program includes more than 30 tumor types in more than 270 clinical trials, including more than 100 trials that combine KEYTRUDA with other cancer treatments.

Findings from KEYNOTE-010 (Abstract #9015)

KEYNOTE-010 is a global, open-label, randomized, pivotal phase 2/3 study evaluating KEYTRUDA (2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every three weeks) compared to standard of care chemotherapy (docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 every three weeks) in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS and were assessed based on patients whose tumors express high levels of PD-L1 (greater than or equal to 50 percent) and in patients with any level of PD-L1 expression (greater than or equal to one percent) – as reflected by tumor proportion scores (TPS). KEYNOTE-010 is the first study of its kind to evaluate the potential of an immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy based on prospective measurement of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced NSCLC. As previously announced, the study met its primary objective showing that KEYTRUDA significantly improved OS compared to chemotherapy in patients with any level of PD-L1 expression. Findings were similar in patients who received the FDA-approved dose of KEYTRUDA (2 mg/kg every three weeks) and the investigational dose of KEYTRUDA (10 mg/kg every three weeks). These findings also served as the basis for the KEYTRUDA application currently under review by the FDA.

Findings from abstract #9015 were based on a sub-analysis of patient outcomes across four PD-L1 expression categories as determined by TPS (one to 24 percent; 25 to 49 percent; 50 to 74 percent; and greater than or equal to 75 percent) (n=1,033). Results showed that the OS, PFS, and overall response rate (ORR) generally increased with increasing levels of PD-L1 expression in those patients treated with KEYTRUDA, but not chemotherapy (docetaxel) – with the longest OS and PFS and highest ORR observed in patients who were in the highest PD-L1 TPS category.

In patients treated with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), median OS was 16.6 months in patients in the highest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 11.2-NR) and 9.7 months in patients in the lowest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 8.9-11.6); median PFS was 6.2 months in patients in the highest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 4.2-8.2) and 2.6 months in the lowest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 2.1-3.4); ORR was 33.7 percent in patients in the highest PD-L1 TPS category and 8.6 percent in the lowest PD-L1 TPS category.

In patients treated with chemotherapy, median OS was 8.2 months in patients in the highest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 5.8-10.9) and 8.5 months in patients in the lowest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 7.5-9.9); median PFS was 4.0 months in patients in the highest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 2.2-4.5) and 4.0 months in the lowest PD-L1 TPS category (95% CI, 2.3-5.5); ORR was 7.0 percent in patients in the highest PD-L1 TPS category and 10.9 percent in the lowest PD-L1 TPS category.

The safety profile of KEYTRUDA was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies of KEYTRUDA.

On June 4, these data will be presented in a poster session from 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CDT (Location: Hall A) and in a poster discussion from 3:00 – 4:15 p.m. CDT (Location: E354b).

Findings from KEYNOTE-001 (Abstract #9026)

KEYNOTE-001 is a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort, activity-estimating phase 1b trial evaluating KEYTRUDA (2 mg/kg every three weeks or 10 mg/kg every two or three weeks) in various advanced cancers, including lung cancer. The lung cancer cohort included treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC. The primary efficacy outcome measure was confirmed ORR as assessed by blinded independent central review using RECIST v1.1. Tumor response was assessed every nine weeks. The secondary outcome measures included PFS, OS, and duration of response. Findings from this study supported the accelerated approval of KEYTRUDA in previously treated NSCLC based on ORR and safety data.

Primary outcome measures observed in treatment-naïve patients (n=101) showed ORR of 58.3 percent (TPS greater than or equal to 50 percent), 17.4 percent (TPS of one to 49 percent), and 10.0 percent (TPS of less than one percent); and ORR in previously treated patients (n=449) of 38.3 percent (TPS greater than or equal to 50 percent), 12.9 percent (TPS of one to 49 percent), and 9.9 percent (TPS of less than one percent). Data at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) also assessed secondary outcome measures, including OS. In treatment-naïve patients, results showed a median OS of 22.1 months (95% CI, 16.8-27.2) with an 18-month OS rate of 58.1 percent and a 24-month OS rate of 44.5 percent. In previously treated patients, results showed a median OS of 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.6-13.3) with an 18-month OS rate of 36.6 percent and a 24-month OS rate of 30.4 percent.

Outcomes were further assessed based on three PD-L1 TPS categories (greater than or equal to 50 percent; one to 49 percent; and less than one percent). Results of this analysis showed that while a benefit was observed across all PD-L1 categories, the greatest benefit was observed in treatment-naïve patients with higher levels of PD-L1 expression (greater than or equal to 50 percent of cells expressing PD-L1). In this group, the 18-month OS rate was 72.7 percent and the 24-month OS rate was 60.6 percent; the median OS had not been reached at the time of analysis.

The safety profile of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) was consistent with that observed in previously reported KEYTRUDA studies. Immune-mediated adverse events of Grade 3-5 were hypothyroidism, pneumonitis, hyperthyroidism, severe skin toxicities, colitis, adrenal insufficiency, and hypophysitis. There were two treatment-related deaths (one case each of interstitial lung disease and cardiopulmonary arrest).

These data will be presented in a poster session on June 4, 8:00 – 11:30 a.m. CDT (Location: Hall A).

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that works by increasing the ability of the body’s immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA-approved test with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not yet been established. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every three weeks for the approved indications.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab)

Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 19 (3.5%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (1.1%), 3 (1.3%), 4 (0.4%), or 5 (0.2%) pneumonitis and occurred more frequently in patients with a history of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.4%) or prior thoracic radiation (6.0%). Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonitis. Evaluate suspected pneumonitis with radiographic imaging. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater pneumonitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent Grade 2 pneumonitis.

Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 4 (0.7%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (0.2%) or 3 (0.4%) colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater colitis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2 or 3; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 4 colitis.

Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor patients for changes in liver function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hepatitis and, based on severity of liver enzyme elevations, withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Hypophysitis occurred in 1 (0.2%) of 550 patients, which was Grade 3 in severity. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis (including hypopituitarism and adrenal insufficiency). Administer corticosteroids and hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; withhold or discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 hypophysitis.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 10 (1.8%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (0.7%) or 3 (0.3%) hyperthyroidism. Hypothyroidism occurred in 38 (6.9%) of 550 patients, including Grade 2 (5.5%) or 3 (0.2%) hypothyroidism. Thyroid disorders can occur at any time during treatment. Monitor patients for changes in thyroid function (at the start of treatment, periodically during treatment, and as indicated based on clinical evaluation) and for clinical signs and symptoms of thyroid disorders. Administer replacement hormones for hypothyroidism and manage hyperthyroidism with thionamides and beta-blockers as appropriate. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 hyperthyroidism.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus, including diabetic ketoacidosis, occurred in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes. Administer insulin for type 1 diabetes, and withhold KEYTRUDA and administer anti-hyperglycemics in patients with severe hyperglycemia.

Immune-mediated nephritis occurred in patients receiving KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab). Monitor patients for changes in renal function. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater nephritis. Withhold KEYTRUDA for Grade 2; permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for Grade 3 or 4 nephritis.

Other clinically important immune-mediated adverse reactions can occur. For suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, ensure adequate evaluation to confirm etiology or exclude other causes. Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, withhold KEYTRUDA and administer corticosteroids. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Based on limited data from clinical studies in patients whose immune-related adverse reactions could not be controlled with corticosteroid use, administration of other systemic immunosuppressants can be considered. Resume KEYTRUDA when the adverse reaction remains at Grade 1 or less following corticosteroid taper. Permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA for any Grade 3 immune-mediated adverse reaction that recurs and for any life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reaction.

The following clinically significant, immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% of 550 patients: rash, vasculitis, hemolytic anemia, serum sickness, and myasthenia gravis.

Severe and life-threatening infusion-related reactions have been reported in 3 (0.1%) of 2117 patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions including rigors, chills, wheezing, pruritus, flushing, rash, hypotension, hypoxemia, and fever. For Grade 3 or 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. If used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant during treatment, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of KEYTRUDA.

KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 14% of 550 patients. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 38% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients were pleural effusion, pneumonia, dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonitis. The most common adverse reactions (reported in at least 20% of patients) were fatigue (44%), cough (29%), decreased appetite (25%), and dyspnea (23%).

No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies have been conducted with KEYTRUDA.

It is not known whether KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, instruct women to discontinue nursing during treatment with KEYTRUDA and for 4 months after the final dose.

Safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA have not been established in pediatric patients.

Our Focus on Cancer

Our goal is to translate breakthrough science into innovative oncology medicines to help people with cancer worldwide. At Merck Oncology, helping people fight cancer is our passion and supporting accessibility to our cancer medicines is our commitment. Our focus is on pursuing research in immuno-oncology and we are accelerating every step in the journey – from lab to clinic – to potentially bring new hope to people with cancer.

As part of our focus on cancer, Merck is committed to exploring the potential of immuno-oncology with one of the fastest-growing development programs in the industry. We are currently executing an expansive research program that includes more than 270 clinical trials evaluating our anti-PD-1 therapy across more than 30 tumor types. We also continue to strengthen our immuno-oncology portfolio through strategic acquisitions and are prioritizing the development of several promising immunotherapeutic candidates with the potential to improve the treatment of advanced cancers.

For more information about our oncology clinical trials, visit www.merck.com/clinicaltrials.

TESARO Provides Pipeline Update at ASCO Investor Briefing

On June 04, 2016 TESARO, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSRO), an oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company, reported an update on its clinical development pipeline during an investor briefing and webcast held in conjunction with the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2016 annual meeting (Press release, TESARO, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513083]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

During the investor briefing, TESARO announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for review the New Drug Application (NDA) for an intravenous (IV) formulation of rolapitant. The FDA has set a target action date under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of January 11, 2017. The NDA for rolapitant IV is supported by data from a clinical program of approximately 350 subjects, and included a bioequivalence study and several other supportive non-clinical and clinical studies.

TESARO also provided an update on its Phase 3 NOVA trial of niraparib in patients with ovarian cancer. A sufficient number of progression free survival (PFS) events has been reached to trigger data analysis for both cohorts. Data cleaning is underway in preparation for database lock and release of top-line results. Finally, TESARO announced FDA clearance of its Investigational New Drug (IND) application for TSR-022, its anti-TIM-3 antibody candidate. A Phase 1 study for TSR-022 is planned to begin in mid-2016.

"We continue to make significant progress with our pipeline of oncology product candidates. The acceptance of the rolapitant IV NDA and clearance of TSR-022 IND are important milestones for TESARO and demonstrate our commitment to advancing new therapeutic options for patients," said Mary Lynne Hedley, Ph.D., President and COO of TESARO. "Our NOVA study results will be the first data from a prospectively designed, randomized, Phase 3 trial of a PARP inhibitor, and we look forward to sharing these data later this quarter."

About Intravenous Rolapitant
Rolapitant IV is a potent and selective NK-1 receptor antagonist with an extended plasma half-life that is being developed for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). NK-1 receptors are highly concentrated in the brain and bind the neurokinin substance P. Activation of NK-1 receptors plays a central role in nausea and vomiting induced by emetogenic stimuli, including certain cancer chemotherapies. NK-1 receptor antagonists have been demonstrated to improve the management of nausea and vomiting experienced by cancer patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. TESARO licensed exclusive rights for the development, manufacture, commercialization, and distribution of rolapitant from OPKO Health, Inc.

About Niraparib
Niraparib is a potent, oral PARP inhibitor that is currently being evaluated in four ongoing pivotal trials. TESARO is building a robust niraparib franchise by assessing activity across multiple tumor types and by evaluating several potential combinations of niraparib with other therapeutics. The ongoing monotherapy development program for niraparib includes a Phase 3 trial in patients with ovarian cancer (the NOVA trial), a registrational Phase 2 treatment trial in patients with ovarian cancer (the QUADRA trial), a Phase 3 trial for the treatment of patients with BRCA-positive breast cancer (the BRAVO trial), and a Phase 3 trial in patients with first-line ovarian cancer (the PRIMA trial). Several combination studies are also underway, including trials of niraparib plus pembrolizumab, bevacizumab, and temozolomide.

About TSR-022

TSR-022 is a monoclonal antibody candidate targeting TIM-3 and was developed as part of a collaboration between TESARO and AnaptysBio, Inc. This collaboration was initiated in March of 2014, and is focused on the development of monospecific antibody drug candidates targeting PD-1 (TSR-042), TIM-3 (TSR-022), and LAG-3 (TSR-033), and bi-specific antibody drug candidates targeting PD-1/TIM-3 and PD-1/LAG-3, in addition to a novel bi-specific antibody candidate designed to target undisclosed targets.

Stemline Therapeutics’ SL-401 Phase 2 BPDCN Data Delivered Via Oral Presentation at ASCO; High Response Rates Demonstrated Across All Lines As Enrollment Proceeds

On June 04, 2016 Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:STML) reported the oral presentation of positive clinical data from its ongoing SL-401 Phase 2 potentially pivotal clinical trial in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) (Press release, Stemline Therapeutics, JUN 4, 2016, View Source [SID:1234513081]). The Phase 2 trial results were delivered today by Naveen Pemmaraju, M.D. from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, via an oral presentation at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) annual meeting in Chicago, IL.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The data presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) cover 24 BPDCN patients treated with SL-401 (19 evaluable for response, 4 recently treated/efficacy assessment pending, and 1 non-evaluable patient). Results demonstrate that SL-401 produced an 89% (17/19) overall response rate (ORR) in BPDCN, with a 100% (12/12) ORR in first-line patients and a 71% (5/7) ORR in relapsed/refractory patients, including one compassionate use patient (see Table 1). In 12 evaluable first-line patients (all doses), there were 9 complete responses (CR) and 2 clinical complete responses (CRc). CRc is defined as a CR in non-skin affected organs with marked gross clearance of skin lesions and residual microscopic skin disease. In the 10 evaluable first-line patients treated at 12 ug/kg/day, the CR/CRc rate was 100% (8 CR and 2 CRc). In the 7 evaluable relapsed/refractory BPDCN patients, including one treated on a compassionate use basis, the ORR rate was 71%, which included 1 CR and 1 CRc (29% CR/CRc rate) and 3 partial responses (PR).

Response duration data continue to mature and appear promising. 75% (9/12) first-line BPDCN patients treated at 12 ug/kg/day remained relapse-free (1+-13+ months). This includes five patients receiving ongoing SL-401 therapy (1+-9+ months; 1+-12+ cycles), and four patients who were successfully bridged to stem cell transplant (SCT) and remain in remission (6+-13+ months after the first dose of SL-401 and 1+-7+ months post-SCT). In the relapse/refractory setting, 43% (3/7) of patients were progression-free and receiving ongoing SL-401 (0.5+-3+ months). Patients are being followed for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) which, while early, are both trending favorably.

The most common side effects were transaminitis and hypoalbuminemia (see Table 2), which were both largely transient and not dose limiting. Dosing and safety parameters were developed during the lead-in stage of the study to minimize the risk of severe capillary leak syndrome. Since implementation of these measures, SL-401 at doses of 12 ug/kg/day has demonstrated a manageable safety and tolerability profile. Also, multiple consecutive cycles of SL-401 at 12 ug/kg/day were not associated with cumulative side effects.

Naveen Pemmaraju, M.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Leukemia at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX), an investigator on the study, commented, "SL-401’s remarkable results to date suggest the agent could very well emerge as the standard of care for both first-line and relapsed/refractory BPDCN, a devastating disease for which there had previously been no effective therapy. Overall, we continue to see very strong activity with SL-401 in both first line and relapsed/refractory patients, and the safety profile continues to be manageable over increasing patient experience. Notably, we have also been able to successfully bridge several patients to transplant which, for the most part, has not been possible at this frequency with existing therapies." Dr. Pemmaraju continued, "We look forward to working closely with Stemline to bring this promising new agent to patients as quickly as possible in BPDCN and other malignancies."

Andrew A. Lane, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Medical Oncology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA), and a co-author on the study, commented, "The SL-401 clinical data in first-line and relapsed/refractory BPDCN continues to demonstrate exciting outcomes in these two underserved patient populations, and represents a promising new option for patients with this devastating disease." Dr. Lane continued, "We are very pleased to be ongoing contributors to this study, and look forward to helping to advance this active agent in both BPDCN and other hematologic malignancies as well."

Ivan Bergstein, M.D., Stemline’s Chief Executive Officer, commented, "We are excited by SL-401’s continued robust clinical data in all lines of BPDCN. SL-401 appears to be a potent agent, demonstrating a rapid onset of action and promising response durability, while its tolerability profile makes it well-suited for either long-term use or bridging BPDCN patients to transplant." Dr. Bergstein concluded, "Over the remainder of the year, we will continue to enroll first-line and relapsed/refractory patients in this ongoing trial, ramp up our disease awareness efforts, and advance our ongoing regulatory interactions in order to bring this agent to market as soon as possible in both settings."

The tables below summarize efficacy and safety observed in the Phase 2 potentially pivotal trial in BPDCN. Enrollment is ongoing and additional data will be available throughout 2016.

Table 1. Overview of SL-401 Clinical Activity in BPDCN

Major objective responses

89% (17/19) ORR in BPDCN (all lines/all doses)
4 additional recently-treated patients (2 first-line and 2 R/R) not yet evaluable for response
100% (12/12) ORR in first-line BPDCN (all doses)
100% (10/10) CR/CRc rate in first-line BPDCN (12 ug/kg/day)
71% (5/7) ORR in R/R BPDCN
29% (2/7) CR/CRc rate in R/R BPDCN
Response duration data maturing

75% (9/12) first-line BPDCN patients treated at 12 ug/kg/day were progression-free (1+-13+ months). This includes:
5 patients receiving ongoing SL-401 therapy (1+-9+ months; 1+-12+ cycles); and
4 patients who were successfully bridged to stem cell transplant (SCT) and remain in remission (6+-13+ months post-first SL-401 dose; 1+-7+ months post-SCT).
43% (3/7) of R/R BPDCN patients were progression-free and receiving ongoing SL-401 (0.5+-3+ months)
Patients continue to be followed for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and, while early, both are trending favorably

Line of Therapy All lines First-line First-line R/R1
Dose Group All Doses All Doses 12 ug/kg 12 ug/kg
n (total) 242 15 12 9
n (evaluable) 19 12 10 7
ORR 89 % 100 % 100 % 71 %
CR/CRc, n (rate) 13 (68%) 11 (92%) 10 (100%) 2 (29%)
PR 4 1 - 3
n, stem cell transplant
(SCT; auto-SCT n=3; allo-SCT n=1) 4 4 4 -
1Includes one patient treated on a compassionate use basis
2Includes 4 patients were recently treated with SL-401 and response assessment is pending

Source: ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper), 2016

Table 2. Overview of SL-401 Safety in BPDCN

Most Common Adverse Events (≥ 15% treatment-related adverse effects, TRAEs)
All Grades (%) Grade ≥ 3 (%)
TRAEs All AEs TRAEs All AEs
Transaminase elevation 61 74 57 61
Hypoalbuminemia 43 48 0 0
Chills 35 39 0 0
Pyrexia 30 48 0 0
Nausea 26 52 0 0
Fatigue 26 43 0 9
Thrombocytopenia 22 22 22 22
Hypotension 22 22 0 0
Weight increased 22 30 0 0
Capillary leak syndrome 22 22 9 9
Anemia 17 30 13 17
Decreased appetite 17 22 0 0
Edema peripheral 17 43 0 0