AbbVie to Present at the Goldman Sachs 46th Annual Global Healthcare Conference

On June 3, 2025 AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV) reported that it will participate in the Goldman Sachs 46th Annual Global Healthcare Conference on Tuesday, June 10, 2025 (Press release, AbbVie, JUN 3, 2025, View Source [SID1234653690]). Management will participate in a fireside chat at 10:20 a.m. Central time.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

A live audio webcast of the presentation will be accessible through AbbVie’s Investor Relations website at investors.abbvie.com. An archived edition of the session will be available later that day.

Johnson & Johnson leads with first PARP inhibitor combo to improve efficacy in patients with HRR-altered mCSPC

On June 3, 2025 Johnson & Johnson reported first results from the Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled AMPLITUDE study evaluating the combination of niraparib and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) with homologous recombination repair (HRR) genetic alterations including BRCA (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, JUN 3, 2025, View Source;johnson-leads-with-first-parp-inhibitor-combo-to-improve-efficacy-in-patients-with-hrr-altered-mcspc-302471320.html [SID1234653689]). The results show a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in both radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and time to symptomatic progression (TSP), with an early trend toward improved overall survival (OS)—highlighting the potential of the combination in this patient population to delay both cancer progression and the worsening of symptoms.1 This marks the first Phase 3 data to show clinical improvement with a PARP-based combination in mCSPC. The findings are being presented as a late-breaking oral presentation (Abstract #LBA5006) at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting. The data have also been selected for Best of ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) and included in the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Press Program.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Approximately 25 percent of patients with mCSPC have HRR alterations, with about half being BRCA. These patients typically experience faster disease progression and poorer outcomes," said Gerhardt Attard*, M.D., Ph.D., FRCP, John Black Charitable Foundation Chair of Medical Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, Research Department of Oncology and presenting author. "The AMPLITUDE trial is the first to show that combining a PARP inhibitor with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor both delays disease progression and postpones the onset of symptoms in HRR-altered mCSPC, supporting this combination as a new treatment option for these patients."

"Our aim with the AMPLITUDE study was to determine how long patients could live without their cancer worsening. What we found is that the combination of niraparib, abiraterone acetate, and prednisone is achieving just that, with the goal of offering patients precious quality time before the disease enters a more resistant phase," said Charles Drake, M.D., Ph.D., FAAP, Vice President, Prostate Cancer and Immunotherapy Disease Area Leader, at Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. "This breakthrough highlights the need for early initiation of personalized treatment strategies for patients with mCSPC and HRR alterations, particularly BRCA, who typically face more aggressive disease."

The Phase 3 AMPLITUDE study of 696 patients with mCSPC and HRR alterations met its primary endpoint of rPFS. Patients with BRCA alterations (n=191) showed the greatest benefit of treatment with the combination of niraparib plus AAP, as the median rPFS was not reached compared to 26 months in patients treated with the placebo plus AAP, reducing the risk of radiographic progression or death by 48 percent (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.72, p<0.0001). In patients with any HRR alteration treated with the niraparib combination, median rPFS was also not reached in comparison to 29.5 months in patients treated with the placebo plus AAP, with a reduction in risk of progression or death by 37 percent (HR 0.63, 95 percent CI, 0.49-0.80, p=0.0001).1

These results also showed that treatment with the niraparib combination reduced the risk of symptomatic progression by 56 percent in patients with BRCA alterations (HR 0.44, 95 percent CI, 0.29-0.68, p=0.0001) and 50 percent in patients with HRR alterations (HR 0.50, 95 percent CI, 0.36-0.69, p<0.0001), meaning that patients experienced a longer delay to worsening symptoms and requiring radiation, surgical intervention, or needing a new anti-cancer therapy. The first interim analysis showed an early trend toward improved overall survival (OS) favoring the niraparib/AAP combination with a reduction in risk of death of 25 percent (HR 0.75, 95 percent CI, 0.51-1.11, p=0.15) in patients with BRCA alterations and 21 percent in HRR alterations (HR 0.79, 95 percent CI, 0.59-1.04, p=0.10); follow-up is ongoing for maturity of the data.1

Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) were more frequent with the niraparib combination compared to the placebo group (75 percent vs. 59 percent), with anemia and hypertension being the most common; however, treatment discontinuations due to AEs remained low (14.7 percent vs 10.3 percent). To date, the safety profile of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone has been consistent with prior experiences.1

New data from the CAPTURE study (Abstract #5094), also being presented at the 2025 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting with simultaneous publication in the Annals of Oncology, reinforce that the presence of HRR, specifically BRCA alterations, among patients with mCSPC are associated with significantly worse prognosis. Despite the availability of life-prolonging ARPIs, patients with HRR-altered mCSPC experience approximately 30 percent faster disease progression and shorter survival, while patients with BRCA-altered mCSPC experience approximately 50 percent faster disease progression and shorter survival—highlighting the importance of genetic testing to inform treatment decisions and the urgent need for novel targeted therapies to improve outcomes and delay progression.2

Johnson & Johnson has nearly 20 years of leadership in prostate cancer, treating more than 750,000 patients worldwide. With the AMPLITUDE study, Johnson & Johnson becomes the first to show that a PARP inhibitor combination can benefit patients with mCSPC.3

About AMPLITUDE
AMPLITUDE (NCT04497844) is an ongoing, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib and abiraterone acetate in a dual-action tablet (DAT) formulation with prednisone plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to matching oral placebo/abiraterone acetate with prednisone plus ADT in patients with deleterious germline or somatic homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-altered metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). The primary endpoint is radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS).

About Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), also known as metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), refers to prostate cancer that still responds to ADT and has spread to other parts of the body.4

About AKEEGA (niraparib and abiraterone acetate)
AKEEGA is a combination, in the form of a dual-action tablet (DAT), of niraparib, a highly selective poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and abiraterone acetate, a CYP17 inhibitor. AKEEGA together with prednisone or prednisolone was approved in April 2023 by the European Medicines Agency, and in August 2023 by the U.S. FDA, for the treatment of patients with BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients are selected for therapy based on an FDA-approved test for genetic alterations. Additional marketing authorization applications are under review across a number of countries globally.

Additional ongoing studies include the Phase 3 AMPLITUDE study evaluating AKEEGA with prednisone or prednisolone in a biomarker-selected patient population with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).

In April 2016, Janssen Biotech, Inc. entered a worldwide (except Japan) collaboration and license agreement with TESARO, Inc. (acquired by GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] in 2019) for exclusive rights to niraparib in prostate cancer.

For more information visit View Source

AKEEGA IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

The safety population described in the WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS reflect exposure to AKEEGA in combination with prednisone in BRCAm patients in Cohort 1 (N=113) of MAGNITUDE.

Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia
AKEEGA may cause myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML).

MDS/AML, including cases with fatal outcome, has been observed in patients treated with niraparib, a component of AKEEGA.

All patients treated with niraparib who developed secondary MDS/cancer-therapy-related AML had received previous chemotherapy with platinum agents and/or other DNA-damaging agents, including radiotherapy.

For suspected MDS/AML or prolonged hematological toxicities, refer the patient to a hematologist for further evaluation. Discontinue AKEEGA if MDS/AML is confirmed.

Myelosuppression
AKEEGA may cause myelosuppression (anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia).

In MAGNITUDE Cohort 1, Grade 3-4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were reported, respectively in 28%, 8%, and 7% of patients receiving AKEEGA. Overall, 27% of patients required a red blood cell transfusion, including 11% who required multiple transfusions. Discontinuation due to anemia occurred in 3% of patients.

Monitor complete blood counts weekly during the first month of AKEEGA treatment, every two weeks for the next two months, monthly for the remainder of the first year and then every other month, and as clinically indicated. Do not start AKEEGA until patients have adequately recovered from hematologic toxicity caused by previous therapy. If hematologic toxicities do not resolve within 28 days following interruption, discontinue AKEEGA and refer the patient to a hematologist for further investigations, including bone marrow analysis and blood sample for cytogenetics.

Hypokalemia, Fluid Retention, and Cardiovascular Adverse Reactions
AKEEGA may cause hypokalemia and fluid retention as a consequence of increased mineralocorticoid levels resulting from CYP17 inhibition. In post-marketing experience, QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes have been observed in patients who develop hypokalemia while taking abiraterone acetate, a component of AKEEGA. Hypertension and hypertensive crisis have also been reported in patients treated with niraparib, a component of AKEEGA.

In MAGNITUDE Cohort 1, which used prednisone 10 mg daily in combination with AKEEGA, Grades 3-4 hypokalemia was detected in 2.7% of patients on the AKEEGA arm and Grades 3-4 hypertension were observed in 14% of patients on the AKEEGA arm.

The safety of AKEEGA in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV heart failure has not been established because these patients were excluded from MAGNITUDE.

Monitor patients for hypertension, hypokalemia, and fluid retention at least weekly for the first two months, then once a month. Closely monitor patients whose underlying medical conditions might be compromised by increases in blood pressure, hypokalemia, or fluid retention, such as those with heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, cardiovascular disease, or ventricular arrhythmia. Control hypertension and correct hypokalemia before and during treatment with AKEEGA.

Discontinue AKEEGA in patients who develop hypertensive crisis or other severe cardiovascular adverse reactions.

Hepatotoxicity
AKEEGA may cause hepatotoxicity.

Hepatotoxicity in patients receiving abiraterone acetate, a component of AKEEGA, has been reported in clinical trials. In post-marketing experience, there have been abiraterone acetate-associated severe hepatic toxicity, including fulminant hepatitis, acute liver failure, and deaths.

In MAGNITUDE Cohort 1, Grade 3-4 ALT or AST increases (at least 5 x ULN) were reported in 1.8% of patients. The safety of AKEEGA in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment has not been established as these patients were excluded from MAGNITUDE.

Measure serum transaminases (ALT and AST) and bilirubin levels prior to starting treatment with AKEEGA, every two weeks for the first three months of treatment and monthly thereafter. Promptly measure serum total bilirubin, AST, and ALT if clinical symptoms or signs suggestive of hepatotoxicity develop. Elevations of AST, ALT, or bilirubin from the patient’s baseline should prompt more frequent monitoring and may require dosage modifications.

Permanently discontinue AKEEGA for patients who develop a concurrent elevation of ALT greater than 3 x ULN and total bilirubin greater than 2 x ULN in the absence of biliary obstruction or other causes responsible for the concurrent elevation, or in patients who develop ALT or AST ≥20 x ULN at any time after receiving AKEEGA.

Adrenocortical Insufficiency
AKEEGA may cause adrenal insufficiency.

Adrenocortical insufficiency has been reported in clinical trials in patients receiving abiraterone acetate, a component of AKEEGA, in combination with prednisone, following interruption of daily steroids and/or with concurrent infection or stress. Monitor patients for symptoms and signs of adrenocortical insufficiency, particularly if patients are withdrawn from prednisone, have prednisone dose reductions, or experience unusual stress. Symptoms and signs of adrenocortical insufficiency may be masked by adverse reactions associated with mineralocorticoid excess seen in patients treated with abiraterone acetate. If clinically indicated, perform appropriate tests to confirm the diagnosis of adrenocortical insufficiency. Increased doses of corticosteroids may be indicated before, during, and after stressful situations.

Hypoglycemia
AKEEGA may cause hypoglycemia in patients being treated with other medications for diabetes.

Severe hypoglycemia has been reported when abiraterone acetate, a component of AKEEGA, was administered to patients receiving medications containing thiazolidinediones (including pioglitazone) or repaglinide.

Monitor blood glucose in patients with diabetes during and after discontinuation of treatment with AKEEGA. Assess if antidiabetic drug dosage needs to be adjusted to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia.

Increased Fractures and Mortality in Combination with Radium 223 Dichloride
AKEEGA with prednisone is not recommended for use in combination with Ra-223 dichloride outside of clinical trials.

The clinical efficacy and safety of concurrent initiation of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone and radium Ra 223 dichloride was assessed in a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study (ERA-223 trial) in 806 patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases. The study was unblinded early based on an Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommendation.

At the primary analysis, increased incidences of fractures (29% vs 11%) and deaths (39% vs 36%) have been observed in patients who received abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone in combination with radium Ra 223 dichloride compared to patients who received placebo in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.

It is recommended that subsequent treatment with Ra-223 not be initiated for at least five days after the last administration of AKEEGA, in combination with prednisone.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome
AKEEGA may cause Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES).

PRES has been observed in patients treated with niraparib as a single agent at higher than the recommended dose of niraparib included in AKEEGA.
Monitor all patients treated with AKEEGA for signs and symptoms of PRES. If PRES is suspected, promptly discontinue AKEEGA and administer appropriate treatment. The safety of reinitiating AKEEGA in patients previously experiencing PRES is not known.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
The safety and efficacy of AKEEGA have not been established in females. Based on animal reproductive studies and mechanism of action, AKEEGA can cause fetal harm and loss of pregnancy when administered to a pregnant female.

Niraparib has the potential to cause teratogenicity and/or embryo-fetal death since niraparib is genotoxic and targets actively dividing cells in animals and patients (e.g., bone marrow).

In animal reproduction studies, oral administration of abiraterone acetate to pregnant rats during organogenesis caused adverse developmental effects at maternal exposures approximately ≥ 0.03 times the human exposure (AUC) at the recommended dose.

Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of AKEEGA. Females who are or may become pregnant should handle AKEEGA with protection, e.g., gloves.

Based on animal studies, AKEEGA may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential.

ADVERSE REACTIONS
The safety of AKEEGA in patients with BRCAm mCRPC was evaluated in Cohort 1 of MAGNITUDE.

The most common adverse reactions (≥10%), including laboratory abnormalities, are decreased hemoglobin, decreased lymphocytes, decreased white blood cells, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, decreased platelets, increased alkaline phosphatase, constipation, hypertension, nausea, decreased neutrophils, increased creatinine, increased potassium, decreased potassium, increased AST, increased ALT, edema, dyspnea, decreased appetite, vomiting, dizziness, COVID-19, headache, abdominal pain, hemorrhage, urinary tract infection, cough, insomnia, increased bilirubin, weight decreased, arrhythmia, fall, and pyrexia.

Serious adverse reactions reported in >2% of patients included COVID-19 (7%), anemia (4.4%), pneumonia (3.5%), and hemorrhage (3.5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 9% of patients who received AKEEGA, including COVID-19 (5%), cardiopulmonary arrest (1%), dyspnea (1%), pneumonia (1%), and septic shock (1%).

DRUG INTERACTIONS
Effect of Other Drugs on AKEEGA

Avoid coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inducers.

Abiraterone is a substrate of CYP3A4. Strong CYP3A4 inducers may decrease abiraterone concentrations, which may reduce the effectiveness of abiraterone.

Effects of AKEEGA on Other Drugs

Avoid coadministration unless otherwise recommended in the Prescribing Information for CYP2D6 substrates for which minimal changes in concentration may lead to serious toxicities. If alternative treatments cannot be used, consider a dose reduction of the concomitant CYP2D6 substrate drug.

Abiraterone is a CYP2D6 moderate inhibitor. AKEEGA increases the concentration of CYP2D6 substrates, which may increase the risk of adverse reactions related to these substrates.

Monitor patients for signs of toxicity related to a CYP2C8 substrate for which a minimal change in plasma concentration may lead to serious or life-threatening adverse reactions.

Abiraterone is a CYP2C8 inhibitor. AKEEGA increases the concentration of CYP2C8 substrates, which may increase the risk of adverse reactions related to these substrates.

Please see the full Prescribing Information for AKEEGA.

PAVmed Subsidiary, Veris Health, Enters into Strategic Partnership Agreement with The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute

On June 3, 2025 PAVmed Inc. (Nasdaq: PAVM) ("PAVmed" or the "Company") a diversified commercial-stage medical technology company, operating in the medical device, diagnostics, and digital health sectors, and its majority-owned digital health subsidiary Veris Health Inc. ("Veris"), reported that Veris has entered into a strategic partnership agreement with The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC – James), a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (Press release, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, JUN 3, 2025, View Source;james-cancer-hospital-and-solove-research-institute-302471800.html [SID1234653688]). This agreement follows the successful completion of a pilot program which enrolled patients across several OSUCCC – James cancer care service lines on the Veris Cancer Care Platform.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Pursuant to the agreement Veris and OSUCCC – James entered into a long-term, multi-project strategic partnership to utilize, and further the development and commercialization of the Veris Cancer Care Platform and its implantable physiologic monitor.

The agreement includes expansion of commercial utilization of the platform across cancer care service lines; full electronic health record (EHR) integration; initiation of a large clinical registry of patients enrolled on the platform to be launched in the coming weeks; and launch of a large clinical trial of patients receiving the implantable physiologic monitor, to be launched upon FDA clearance, expected next year. It also calls for close collaboration on the development of clinical cancer care pathways, platform software enhancements, and best practices for clinical use of the implantable physiological monitor.

"We are thrilled to advance our strategic partnership with OSUCCC – James, one of the largest and most prestigious academic cancer centers in the nation, following the successful completion of a pilot program demonstrating the strong clinical utility of our platform," said Brian deGuzman, M.D., Chief Operating Officer of Veris Health. "This commercial transition represents a major milestone for Veris. We look forward to working closely with the OSUCCC – James team to enhance the care of thousands of cancer patients there every year."

"At the OSUCCC – James, delivering personalized, world-class cancer care remains our top priority," said David Cohn, M.D., M.B.A., Chief Operating Officer and Chair of Gynecologic Oncology at The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute. "After a successful pilot program, we are excited to be entering into a long-term strategic partnership with Veris Health to expand access to the Veris Cancer Care Platform and enhance the care of our patients."

The Veris Cancer Care Platform is a comprehensive digital cancer care platform with remote physiological data collection, symptom reporting, telehealth capability, and electronic health record integration. The platform seeks to offer enhanced personalized cancer care through the early detection of complications, reduced unplanned hospitalizations, the provision of longitudinal trends of physiological and clinical data, data-driven risk management tools, and increased patient and provider satisfaction.

Cancer patients enrolled on the platform receive a VerisBox of Veris-branded connected health care devices which transmit physiologic data to the cloud-based clinician portal via embedded cellular connections. A complementary patient portal enables patients to report symptoms, as well as general health and quality of life parameters, to their cancer care team through the Veris patient smartphone app. The app also allows patients to invite caretakers and family members to follow along on their cancer care journey. Veris is also developing an implantable physiological monitor, designed to be implanted alongside a vascular access port, which will interface with the Veris Cancer Care Platform. The implantable monitor will further enhance the clinical and commercial value of the platform by providing remote physiologic data independent of patient compliance.

Cancer centers and oncology practices interested in learning more about Veris and the Veris Platform, please visit www.verishealth.com to contact a company representative.

AVEO Oncology, an LG Chem company, Presents Three Posters at ASCO 2025 Annual Meeting

On June 3, 2025 AVEO Oncology, an LG Chem company ("AVEO"), a biopharmaceutical company committed to providing differentiated solutions to improve cancer patients lives, reported three posters during the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) 2025 annual meeting in Chicago, IL, including one exploratory sub-analysis for tivozanib and two trials in progress (Press release, AVEO, JUN 3, 2025, View Source [SID1234653687]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Michael Bailey, president and Chief Executive Officer, stated, "We were really excited to present these three posters at this year’s ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) annual meeting, which we believe further showcase the use of tivozanib after frontline ICI-based combination therapy, but also AVEO’s pipeline which is focused on developing therapies that improve the lives of patients with cancer."

Poster title: "Efficacy of second line (2L) treatment with tivozanib (Tivo) as monotherapy or with nivolumab (Nivo) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) previously treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination of ipilimumab (Ipi)/Nivo or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI)/ICI in the Phase 3 TiNivo-2 study." – (Abstract: 4540; Poster: 340)

AVEO presented data from an exploratory sub-analysis of the TiNivo-2 study, evaluating the efficacy of tivozanib as a 2nd line treatment option in patients who failed 1st line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy. The subgroup analysis indicates that tivozanib monotherapy at 1.34mg daily showed activity, including substantial tumor size reduction, in patients who previously received a contemporary 1st line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment regimen. Additionally, the sub-analysis showed no benefit in the addition of nivolumab to tivozanib in this context, akin to the results of the parent TiNivo-2 trial.

Poster Title: "FIERCE-HN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of ficlatuzumab (HGF/cMET Mab) in combination with cetuximab in participants with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HPV negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)."– (Abstract: TPS6115; Poster: 520a)

AVEO presented a trial in progress poster for the Phase 3 FIERCE-HN trial, which is evaluating the combination of ficlatuzumab and cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ficlatuzumab (10 or 20 mg/kg) in combination with cetuximab (500 mg/kg) against placebo plus cetuximab in participants with HPV-negative R/M HNSCC. The study is evaluating whether ficlatuzumab combined with cetuximab is superior to cetuximab alone in terms of overall survival.

FIERCE-HN opened for enrollment in December 2023 and currently expects to complete enrollment by May 2026. For more information, visit www.FIERCEHN.com.

Poster Title: "A phase 1b dose escalation study of AV-380 (anti-GDF15 monoclonal antibody) in combination with standard-of-care therapy in cancer patients with cachexia."– (Abstract: TPS12142; Poster: 159a)

AVEO presented a second trial in progress poster for their AV-380 phase 1b dose escalation study. During the meeting, the company also announced the official molecule name for AV-380: rilogrotug (pronounced rye-low-grow-tug). Rilogrotug is an immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) intended to bind circulating human growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine involved in cancer-induced cachexia. This open label ascending dose study is designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of rilogrotug in cancer patients with cachexia.

FOTIVDA (tivozanib)

INDICATIONS
FOTIVDA is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following two or more prior systemic therapies.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Hypertension was reported in 45% of patients (22% ≥ Grade 3). Hypertensive crises were reported in 0.8% of patients. Do not initiate FOTIVDA in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Monitor for hypertension and treat as needed. Reduce the FOTIVDA dose for persistent hypertension not controlled by anti-hypertensive medications. Discontinue FOTIVDA for severe hypertension that cannot be controlled with anti-hypertensive therapy or for hypertensive crisis.

Cardiac failures were reported in 1.6% of patients (1% ≥ Grade 3); 0.6% of events were fatal. Monitor for signs or symptoms of cardiac failure during treatment with FOTIVDA. Manage with dose interruption, dose reduction, or discontinuation.

Cardiac ischemia were reported in 3.2% of patients; 0.4% of events were fatal. Arterial thromboembolic events were reported in 2.0% of patients, including death due to ischemic stroke (0.1%). Closely monitor patients at risk for, or who have a history of these events. Discontinue FOTIVDA in patients who develop severe arterial thromboembolic events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke.

Venous Thrombotic Events (VTE) were reported in 2.4% of patients, including 0.3% fatal events. Closely monitor patients who are at increased risk for these events. Discontinue in patients who develop serious VTEs.

Hemorrhagic Events were reported in 11% of patients; 0.2% of events were fatal. Use FOTIVDA with caution in patients who are at risk for or who have a history of bleeding.

Proteinuria was reported in 8% of patients (2% = Grade 3). Monitor during treatment with FOTIVDA. For moderate to severe proteinuria, reduce the dose or interrupt treatment. Discontinue in patients who develop nephrotic syndrome.

Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation including fatal cases, has been reported in patients receiving FOTIVDA. Monitor for symptoms of GI perforation or fistula formation periodically throughout treatment with FOTIVDA. Permanently discontinue FOTIVDA in patients who develop severe or life-threatening GI perforation.

Thyroid Dysfunction events were reported in 11% of patients (0.3% ≥ Grade 3). Monitor thyroid function before and during treatment with FOTIVDA.

Wound Healing Complications: Withhold FOTIVDA for at least 24 days prior to elective surgery and do not administer for at least 2 weeks after major surgery and until adequate wound healing is observed.

Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS) can occur with FOTIVDA. Evaluate for RPLS in patients presenting with seizures, headache, visual disturbances, confusion, or altered mental function. Discontinue if signs or symptoms of RPLS occur.

Embryo-fetal Toxicity: FOTIVDA can cause fetal harm. Advise patients of the potential risk to a fetus, to avoid becoming pregnant and to use contraception during treatment and for one month after the last dose of FOTIVDA. Advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for one month after the last dose of FOTIVDA.

Allergic Reaction to Tartrazine: FOTIVDA 0.89 mg capsule contains FD&C Yellow No. 5 (tartrazine) which may cause allergic-type reactions (including bronchial asthma) in certain susceptible patients.

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Common adverse reactions include fatigue/asthenia, hypertension, diarrhea, decreased appetite, nausea, dysphonia, hypothyroidism, cough, and stomatitis.

Serious adverse reactions include bleeding (3.5%), venous thromboembolism (3.5%), arterial thromboembolism (2.9%), acute kidney injury (2.3%), and hepatobiliary disorders (2.3%).

DRUG INTERACTIONS
Avoid coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inducers.

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS
Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment and for at least 1 month after the last dose.

The recommended dosage for patients with end-stage renal disease has not been established.

Reduce the FOTIVDA dose for patients with moderate hepatic impairment. The recommended dosage in patients with severe hepatic impairment has not been established.

To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 1-833-FOTIVDA (1-833-368-4832) or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch.

Please see full Prescribing Information for FOTIVDA (tivozanib).

About FOTIVDA (tivozanib)
FOTIVDA (tivozanib) is an oral, next-generation vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is a potent, selective inhibitor of VEGFRs 1, 2, and 3 with a long half-life designed to improve efficacy and tolerability. AVEO received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for FOTIVDA on March 10, 2021, for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following two or more prior systemic therapies, based on data from the TIVO-3 trial comparing FOTIVDA to sorafenib. FOTIVDA was approved in August 2017 in the European Union and other countries in the territory of its partner Recordati UK Ltd. for the treatment of adult patients with advanced RCC. FOTIVDA was discovered by Kyowa Kirin.

DARZALEX FASPRO® (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj)-based regimen shows 95 percent progression-free survival at four years in transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who achieved sustained MRD negativity

On June 3, 2025 Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) reported data from two studies highlighting that a DARZALEX FASPRO (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj)-based quadruplet regimen demonstrated deep and sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates, and improved long-term progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), regardless of transplant status (Press release, Johnson & Johnson, JUN 3, 2025, View Source [SID1234653686]). Findings were highlighted as oral presentations of an analysis of sustained MRD in transplant-eligible patients from the Phase 3 PERSEUS study (Abstract #7501) and a subgroup analysis of transplant-ineligible patients in the Phase 3 CEPHEUS study (Abstract #7516) at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

New analysis from the Phase 3 PERSEUS study shows the addition of DARZALEX FASPRO to bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-VRd), followed by an investigational maintenance regimen of DARZALEX FASPRO with lenalidomide (D-R), led to improved and deepened rates of overall and sustained MRD negativity (10-5), defined as no cancer cells detected within 100,000 bone marrow cells) for at least 24 months, compared to VRd induction and consolidation with R maintenance. More than half of patients who received the DARZALEX FASPRO-based regimen achieved sustained MRD negativity for 24 or more months and more than two-thirds of patients achieved sustained MRD-negativity at 12-months, showing 95.3 percent PFS at 48-months (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.3-2.3)—reinforcing the ability of DARZALEX FASPRO to delay disease progression or death.1

"The data show that D-VRd followed by an investigational D-R maintenance regimen is a highly effective treatment option for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma," said Philippe Moreau*, M.D., head of the Hematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France and presenting author. "The depth and durability of MRD negativity observed—paired with unprecedented progression-free survival at four years—underscore the long-term benefit the DARZALEX FASPRO-based regimen can offer patients early in their treatment journey."

At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, 24-month sustained MRD negativity rates at the 10⁻⁵ sensitivity threshold were more than double with D-VRd followed by investigational D-R maintenance (55.8 percent), compared to VRd followed by R maintenance (22.6 percent) (odds ratio [OR]=4.36; 95 percent CI, 3.15-6.05; P<0.0001). Similarly, MRD negativity at 12 months was higher with D-VRd and D-R maintenance at 64.8 percent compared to VRd and R maintenance (29.7 percent) (OR=4.42, 95 percent CI, 3.22-6.08, P<0.0001).1

Additional data from Phase 3 CEPHEUS study explore the benefits of DARZALEX FASPRO in transplant-ineligible patients across cytogenetic risk status

The post-hoc analysis of the Phase 3 CEPHEUS study focused exclusively on transplant-ineligible patients, reinforcing that adding DARZALEX FASPRO to VRd significantly deepens response and prolongs PFS compared to VRd alone, even in patients who are older and considered frail by the Myeloma Geriatric Assessment score.

At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, patients receiving D-VRd achieved markedly higher overall MRD negativity rates at the 10⁻⁵ sensitivity threshold with 60.4 percent versus 39.3 percent with VRd (OR 2.37; 95 percent CI, 1.47–3.80; P=0.0004). Furthermore, treatment with D-VRd resulted in high MRD-negativity rates at the 10⁻⁶ threshold (no cancer cells detected within 1,000,000 bone marrow cells) with 45.8 percent compared to 26.9 percent with VRd (OR 2.28; 95 percent CI, 1.40–3.73; P=0.0010). These deeper responses translated into improved long-term outcomes, with 69 percent of patients remaining progression free at 54-months when treated with D-VRd versus 48.0 percent with VRd (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95 percent CI, 0.35–0.74). Overall survival (OS) numerically favored D-VRd (HR 0.66; 95 percent CI, 0.42–1.03), with an even greater benefit observed after censoring for COVID-19-related deaths (HR 0.55; 95 percent CI, 0.34–0.90).2

Additional data presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) included a subgroup analysis of the CEPHEUS trial for both transplant-ineligible and deferred NDMM patients who were considered high-risk for cytogenetic abnormalities (Abstract #7529). At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, overall MRD negativity rate was improved for patients with standard risk in D-VRd versus VRd. Rates by treatment arm in patients at high risk were comparable.3

"Across multiple studies, the growing body of data on DARZALEX-based regimens indicates impressive, deep responses and meaningful progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, including high risk," Jordan Schecter, MD, Vice President, Disease Area Leader, Multiple Myeloma, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. "These consistent results across patient populations, regardless of transplant eligibility, reinforce the role of DARZALEX FASPRO as a cornerstone of frontline therapy."

In the PERSEUS and CEPHEUS studies, the safety profiles were consistent with the known safety profile for DARZALEX FASPRO.

About the PERSEUS Study
The PERSEUS study is being conducted in collaboration with the European Myeloma Network as the sponsor. PERSEUS is an ongoing, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of D-VRd during induction and consolidation versus VRd during induction and consolidation in patients with NDMM eligible for ASCT. Following consolidation, patients received an investigational treatment regimen for maintenance that included DARZALEX FASPRO in combination with lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone. The trial was not designed to isolate the effect of DARZALEX FASPRO in the maintenance phase of treatment. The efficacy of DARZALEX FASPRO in combination with lenalidomide for maintenance has not been established. The primary endpoint is PFS, and secondary endpoints include overall CR or better rate, and overall MRD-negativity (in patients with CR or better). The median age is 61.0 (range, 32-70) years for patients in the D-VRd arm and 59.0 (range, 31-70) years for patients in the VRd arm.2 The study is being conducted in 14 countries in Europe and Australia.

About the CEPHEUS Study
CEPHEUS (NCT03652064) is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of D-VRd versus VRd in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant-ineligible or for whom transplant is not intended as initial therapy. Primary endpoint is overall MRD negativity rate at 10-5 sensitivity threshold. Secondary endpoints include CR or better rates, PFS, sustained MRD negativity rates for ≥12 months, MRD-negative rate at one year, overall response rates, time to and duration of response, PFS on next line of therapy, overall survival and safety. The trial has enrolled 396 patients in 13 countries.

About Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer that affects a type of white blood cell called plasma cells, which are found in the bone marrow.4 In multiple myeloma, these malignant plasma cells proliferate and replace normal cells in the bone marrow.5 Multiple myeloma is the second most common blood cancer worldwide and remains an incurable disease.6 In 2024, it is estimated that more than 35,000 people will be diagnosed with multiple myeloma in the U.S. and more than 12,000 will die from the disease.7 People with multiple myeloma have a 5-year survival rate of 59.8 percent. While some people diagnosed with multiple myeloma initially have no symptoms, most patients are diagnosed due to symptoms that can include bone fracture or pain, low red blood cell counts, tiredness, high calcium levels, kidney problems or infections.8,9

About DARZALEX FASPRO and DARZALEX
DARZALEX FASPRO (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj) received U.S. FDA approval in May 2020 and is approved for nine indications in MM, four of which are for frontline treatment in newly diagnosed patients who are transplant-eligible or ineligible.3,6 It is the only subcutaneous CD38-directed antibody approved to treat patients with MM. DARZALEX FASPRO is co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20, Halozyme’s ENHANZE drug delivery technology.

DARZALEX (daratumumab) received U.S. FDA approval in November 2015 and is approved in eight indications, three of which are in the frontline setting, including newly diagnosed patients who are transplant-eligible and ineligible.9

DARZALEX is the first CD38-directed antibody approved to treat MM.9 DARZALEX-based regimens have been used in the treatment of more than 618,000 patients worldwide.

In August 2012, Janssen Biotech, Inc. and Genmab A/S entered a worldwide agreement, which granted Janssen an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize daratumumab. 

For more information, visit View Source;

DARZALEX FASPRO INDICATIONS AND IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION   

INDICATIONS 
DARZALEX FASPRO (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with MM: 

In combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction and consolidation in newly diagnosed patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant
In combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed patients who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant
In combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant and in patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received at least one prior therapy
In combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant
In combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients who have received at least one prior line of therapy including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI)
In combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received one to three prior lines of therapy
In combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients who have received at least one prior therapy
As monotherapy in patients who have received at least three prior lines of therapy including a PI and an immunomodulatory agent or who are double refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory agent
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION  

CONTRAINDICATIONS    
DARZALEX FASPRO is contraindicated in patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity to daratumumab, hyaluronidase, or any of the components of the formulation.    

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS    

Hypersensitivity and Other Administration Reactions    
Both systemic administration-related reactions, including severe or life-threatening reactions, and local injection-site reactions can occur with DARZALEX FASPRO. Fatal reactions have been reported with daratumumab-containing products, including DARZALEX FASPRO.   

Systemic Reactions    
In a pooled safety population of 1249 patients with MM (N=1056) or light chain (AL) amyloidosis (N=193) who received DARZALEX FASPRO as monotherapy or in combination, 7 percent of patients experienced a systemic administration-related reaction (Grade 2: 3.2 percent, Grade 3: 0.7 percent, Grade 4: 0.1 percent). Systemic administration-related reactions occurred in 7 of patients with the first injection, 0.2 percent with the second injection, and cumulatively 1 percent with subsequent injections. The median time to onset was 2.9 hours (range: 5 minutes to 3.5 days). Of the 165 systemic administration-related reactions that occurred in 93 patients, 144 (87 percent) occurred on the day of DARZALEX FASPRO administration. Delayed systemic administration-related reactions have occurred in 1 percent of the patients. 

Severe reactions included hypoxia, dyspnea, hypertension, tachycardia, and ocular adverse reactions, including choroidal effusion, acute myopia, and acute angle closure glaucoma. Other signs and symptoms of systemic administration-related reactions may include respiratory symptoms, such as bronchospasm, nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, allergic rhinitis, and wheezing, as well as anaphylactic reaction, pyrexia, chest pain, pruritus, chills, vomiting, nausea, hypotension, and blurred vision.    

Pre-medicate patients with histamine-1 receptor antagonist, acetaminophen, and corticosteroids. Monitor patients for systemic administration-related reactions, especially following the first and second injections. For anaphylactic reaction or life-threatening (Grade 4) administration-related reactions, immediately and permanently discontinue DARZALEX FASPRO. Consider administering corticosteroids and other medications after the administration of DARZALEX FASPRO depending on dosing regimen and medical history to minimize the risk of delayed (defined as occurring the day after administration) systemic administration-related reactions.    

Ocular adverse reactions, including acute myopia and narrowing of the anterior chamber angle due to ciliochoroidal effusions with potential for increased intraocular pressure or glaucoma, have occurred with daratumumab-containing products. If ocular symptoms occur, interrupt DARZALEX FASPRO and seek immediate ophthalmologic evaluation prior to restarting DARZALEX FASPRO.    

Local Reactions    
In this pooled safety population, injection-site reactions occurred in 7 percent of patients, including Grade 2 reactions in 0.8 percent. The most frequent (>1 percent) injection-site reaction was injection-site erythema. These local reactions occurred a median of 5 minutes (range: 0 minutes to 6.5 days) after starting administration of DARZALEX FASPRO. Monitor for local reactions and consider symptomatic management.    

Neutropenia    
Daratumumab may increase neutropenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. Consider withholding DARZALEX FASPRO until recovery of neutrophils. In lower body weight patients receiving DARZALEX FASPRO, higher rates of Grade 3-4 neutropenia were observed.    

Thrombocytopenia    
Daratumumab may increase thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Consider withholding DARZALEX FASPRO until recovery of platelets.    

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity    
Based on the mechanism of action, DARZALEX FASPRO can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. DARZALEX FASPRO may cause depletion of fetal immune cells and decreased bone density. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females with reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with DARZALEX FASPRO and for 3 months after the last dose.    

The combination of DARZALEX FASPRO with lenalidomide, thalidomide, or pomalidomide is contraindicated in pregnant women because lenalidomide, thalidomide, and pomalidomide may cause birth defects and death of the unborn child. Refer to the lenalidomide, thalidomide, or pomalidomide prescribing information on use during pregnancy.    

Interference With Serological Testing    
Daratumumab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and results in a positive indirect antiglobulin test (indirect Coombs test). Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect antiglobulin test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab administration. Daratumumab bound to RBCs masks detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient’s serum. The determination of a patient’s ABO and Rh blood type are not impacted.    

Notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with serological testing and inform blood banks that a patient has received DARZALEX FASPRO. Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX FASPRO.    

Interference With Determination of Complete Response    
Daratumumab is a human immunoglobulin G (IgG) kappa monoclonal antibody that can be detected on both the serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein. This interference can impact the determination of complete response and of disease progression in some DARZALEX FASPRO-treated patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein.    

ADVERSE REACTIONS    

In MM, the most common adverse reaction (≥20 percent) with DARZALEX FASPRO monotherapy is upper respiratory tract infection. The most common adverse reactions with combination therapy (≥20 percent for any combination) include fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, headache, pyrexia, cough, muscle spasms, back pain, vomiting, hypertension, upper respiratory tract infection, peripheral sensory neuropathy, constipation, pneumonia, and peripheral edema.    

The most common hematology laboratory abnormalities (≥40 percent) with DARZALEX FASPRO are decreased leukocytes, decreased lymphocytes, decreased neutrophils, decreased platelets, and decreased hemoglobin.    

Please click here to see the full Prescribing Information for DARZALEX FASPRO.    

DARZALEX INDICATIONS AND IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

INDICATIONS  

DARZALEX (daratumumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with MM:  

In combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed patients who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant
In combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant and in patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received at least one prior therapy
In combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant
In combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients who have received at least one prior line of therapy including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor
In combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received one to three prior lines of therapy
In combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients who have received at least one prior therapy
As monotherapy in patients who have received at least three prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent or who are double-refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory agent
CONTRAINDICATIONS

DARZALEX is contraindicated in patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity (eg, anaphylactic reactions) to daratumumab or any of the components of the formulation.  

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS  

Infusion-Related Reactions  

DARZALEX can cause severe and/or serious infusion-related reactions including anaphylactic reactions. These reactions can be life-threatening, and fatal outcomes have been reported. In clinical trials (monotherapy and combination: N=2066), infusion-related reactions occurred in 37 percent of patients with the Week 1 (16 mg/kg) infusion, 2 percent with the Week 2 infusion, and cumulatively 6 percent with subsequent infusions. Less than 1 percent of patients had a Grade 3/4 infusion-related reaction at Week 2 or subsequent infusions. The median time to onset was 1.5 hours (range: 0 to 73 hours). Nearly all reactions occurred during infusion or within 4 hours of completing DARZALEX. Severe reactions have occurred, including bronchospasm, hypoxia, dyspnea, hypertension, tachycardia, headache, laryngeal edema, pulmonary edema, and ocular adverse reactions, including choroidal effusion, acute myopia, and acute angle closure glaucoma. Signs and symptoms may include respiratory symptoms, such as nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, as well as chills, vomiting, and nausea. Less common signs and symptoms were wheezing, allergic rhinitis, pyrexia, chest discomfort, pruritus, hypotension and blurred vision.

When DARZALEX dosing was interrupted in the setting of ASCT (CASSIOPEIA) for a median of 3.75 months (range: 2.4 to 6.9 months), upon re-initiation of DARZALEX, the incidence of infusion-related reactions was 11 percent for the first infusion following ASCT. Infusion-related reactions occurring at re-initiation of DARZALEX following ASCT were consistent in terms of symptoms and severity (Grade 3 or 4: <1 percent) with those reported in previous studies at Week 2 or subsequent infusions. In EQUULEUS, patients receiving combination treatment (n=97) were administered the first 16 mg/kg dose at Week 1 split over two days, ie, 8 mg/kg on Day 1 and Day 2, respectively. The incidence of any grade infusion-related reactions was 42 percent, with 36 percent of patients experiencing infusion-related reactions on Day 1 of Week 1, 4 percent on Day 2 of Week 1, and 8 percent with subsequent infusions.

Pre-medicate patients with antihistamines, antipyretics, and corticosteroids.

Frequently monitor patients during the entire infusion. Interrupt DARZALEX infusion for reactions of any severity and institute medical management as needed. Permanently discontinue DARZALEX therapy if an anaphylactic reaction or life-threatening (Grade 4) reaction occurs and institute appropriate emergency care. For patients with Grade 1, 2, or 3 reactions, reduce the infusion rate when re-starting the infusion.

To reduce the risk of delayed infusion-related reactions, administer oral corticosteroids to all patients following DARZALEX infusions. Patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may require additional post-infusion medications to manage respiratory complications. Consider prescribing short- and long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Ocular adverse reactions, including acute myopia and narrowing of the anterior chamber angle due to ciliochoroidal effusions with potential for increased intraocular pressure or glaucoma, have occurred with DARZALEX infusion. If ocular symptoms occur, interrupt DARZALEX infusion and seek immediate ophthalmologic evaluation prior to restarting DARZALEX.

Interference With Serological Testing  

Daratumumab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and results in a positive indirect antiglobulin test (indirect Coombs test). Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect antiglobulin test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab infusion. Daratumumab bound to RBCs masks detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient’s serum. The determination of a patient’s ABO and Rh blood type is not impacted. Notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with serological testing and inform blood banks that a patient has received DARZALEX. Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX.

Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia  

DARZALEX may increase neutropenia and thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy. Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer’s prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. Consider withholding DARZALEX until recovery of neutrophils or for recovery of platelets.

Interference With Determination of Complete Response  

Daratumumab is a human immunoglobulin G (IgG) kappa monoclonal antibody that can be detected on both the serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein. This interference can impact the determination of complete response and of disease progression in some patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity  

Based on the mechanism of action, DARZALEX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. DARZALEX may cause depletion of fetal immune cells and decreased bone density. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females with reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with DARZALEX and for 3 months after the last dose.

The combination of DARZALEX with lenalidomide, pomalidomide, or thalidomide is contraindicated in pregnant women because lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide may cause birth defects and death of the unborn child. Refer to the lenalidomide, pomalidomide, or thalidomide prescribing information on use during pregnancy.

ADVERSE REACTIONS  

The most frequently reported adverse reactions (incidence ≥20 percent) were: upper respiratory infection, neutropenia, infusion related reactions, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, constipation, anemia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, fatigue, peripheral edema, nausea, cough, pyrexia, dyspnea, and asthenia. The most common hematologic laboratory abnormalities (≥40 percent) with DARZALEX are: neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia.