Hoth Therapeutics Reports FDA Orphan Drug Designation and Strong Preclinical Data for HT-KIT in Rare c-KIT-Driven Cancers

On October 21, 2025 Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOTH) reported FDA Orphan Drug Designation for HT-KIT and new preclinical data demonstrating >80% suppression of KIT expression and significant tumor-volume reduction by Day 8 in systemic mastocytosis and GIST models. HT-KIT, a precision antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting KIT mRNA, also completed GLP-validated bioanalytical methods supporting IND-enabling studies; Japan Patent No. 7677628 extends platform protection to 2039.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Preclinical Summary (2025):

Potent gene-level target suppression: HT-KIT achieved >80% reduction of KIT mRNA/protein across in-vitro systems and in vivo models of systemic mastocytosis and GIST.

Rapid anti-tumor activity: In xenograft models, statistically significant tumor-volume reduction by Day 8 was observed, accompanied by apoptotic signaling consistent with KIT pathway knock-down.

Favorable tolerability in early studies: No dose-limiting toxicities observed in the reported preclinical work to date.

Bioanalytical readiness: GLP-validated bioanalytical methods completed to support pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, and exposure-response analyses for IND.
Mechanistic Rationale:

Unlike small-molecule TKIs that inhibit kinase activity, HT-KIT operates upstream at the transcript level, silencing both mutant and wild-type KIT. This mechanism is designed to bypass resistance pathways (secondary mutations, compensatory signaling) and reduce off-target liabilities, potentially improving durability and tolerability in KIT-driven diseases such as aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), SM-AHN, mast cell leukemia (MCL), GIST, and select leukemias.

Orphan Drug Designation (U.S.) supports development in a rare disease with incentives including potential exclusivity upon approval, tax credits, and fee waivers.
Planned Next Steps (Near-Term):

Complete GLP toxicology and CMC packages; submit IND.

Initiate Phase 1/2 dose-escalation/expansion study in advanced systemic mastocytosis and other KIT-driven tumors with translational biomarkers of target engagement (KIT knock-down, tryptase/MRK signaling) and early efficacy readouts (ORR, DCR, PFS signals).

Continue regional IP expansion and evaluate strategic partnerships for development and commercialization.
"HT-KIT’s transcript-level suppression of KIT has now produced consistent anti-tumor performance across models, with a clean preclinical tolerability profile and GLP-ready analytics," said Robb Knie, Chief Executive Officer. "With Orphan Drug Designation secured and an IND-enabling package progressing, we are preparing for a disciplined entry into first-in-human evaluation."

About HT-KIT:

HT-KIT is a precision ASO designed to silence KIT at the mRNA level, aiming to overcome resistance and off-target toxicity seen with kinase inhibitors in systemic mastocytosis, GIST, and select leukemias.

(Press release, Hoth Therapeutics, OCT 21, 2025, View Source [SID1234656883])

HanchorBio Secures US Patent for Innovative SIRPα/CD47 Fusion Protein HCB101

On October 21, 2025 HanchorBio reported that its proprietary HCB101, a SIRPα/CD47 fusion protein candidate, has been officially granted a US patent (Patent No. 12,447,195) by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Titled "ENGINEERED SIRPα VARIANTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF", the patent represents major international recognition for the company’s innovative technology for immuno-oncology.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Mechanism of Action and Novelty of HCB101: An Innovative Fusion Protein Design

Developed using HanchorBio’s proprietary FBDB (Fc-Based Designed Biologics) platform, HCB101 is an engineered SIRPα/CD47 fusion protein designed to precisely modulate the immune system’s recognition and phagocytic functions, effectively overcoming the challenge of tumor immune evasion and enhancing the clearance of cancer cells.

The molecule employs an engineered variant strategy, featuring novel amino acid substitutions at previously unclaimed and undisclosed SIRPα sites.
These innovative structural mutations significantly enhance the binding affinity and functional potency of HCB101 toward CD47 expressed on tumor cells, thereby reactivating macrophage-mediated cancer cell killing while minimizing the hematologic toxicities commonly associated with traditional CD47 monoclonal antibody therapies.

The USPTO recognized HCB101’s original mutation design and unprecedented potency as clear evidence of novelty and inventive step, distinguishing it from prior technologies and enabling the molecule to successfully pass the rigorous US patent examination process.

In addition to robust intellectual property protection, the patent also strengthens HanchorBio’s position for licensing negotiations and strategic collaborations, further enhancing its global partnership and value creation potential.

Dr. Scott Liu, Chairman of HanchorBio, commented: "The US patent grant for HCB101 is a testament to HanchorBio’s robust R&D capabilities in immunotherapy, while also illustrating the heights of innovation that Taiwan’s biotech industry is capable of reaching. Backed by a solid IP position, we are committed to further expanding global collaboration."

Why the United States: A Strategic and Symbolic First Step

HanchorBio strategically selected the United States as the first jurisdiction for patent filing and issuance, recognizing it as the world’s most influential and standard-bearing market for biopharmaceutical innovation and licensing. US patent approval often serves as a benchmark for patent examiners in other countries, amplifying both credibility and momentum for subsequent filings.

For the filing, HanchorBio worked with Fish & Richardson, one of the largest and most respected intellectual property law firms in the US. The successful approval of HCB101’s US patent demonstrates the molecule’s technical originality and therapeutic advancement, paving the way for accelerated future examinations in Europe and multiple Asian territories.

Dr. Wenwu Zhai, Chief Scientific Officer of HanchorBio, remarked:
"We prioritized the US market as the foundation of our IP strategy, as its market scale and influence align closely with our long-term growth objectives. Building on this milestone, we will further build a comprehensive global IP protection network."

Global Patent Strategy: Strengthening Licensing and Partnerships

Following this US patent grant, HanchorBio will advance patent filings across Europe, Taiwan, and other Asian countries as part of its broader global IP roadmap.
This strategy aims to consolidate the company’s leadership in immuno-oncology and fusion protein drug development, while significantly enhancing its negotiating power for international licensing and co-development opportunities.

The HCB101 patent represents not only a technological milestone but also a pivotal step in HanchorBio’s journey toward global market expansion.

(Press release, Hanchor Bio, OCT 21, 2025, View Source [SID1234656882])

Atossa Therapeutics Highlights Progress in RECAST™ DCIS Platform Trial at Early Detection Research Conference; Laura Esserman, MD, MBA, to Discuss Active-Surveillance Strategy and Novel Endocrine Agents

On October 21, 2025 Atossa Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: ATOS) ("Atossa" or the "Company"), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing innovative medicines in oncology, reported that Laura J. Esserman, MD, MBA, Professor of Surgery and Radiology at the University of California, San Francisco and Principal Investigator of RECAST, will speak at the Early Detection Research Conference in Portland, OR, about the Company’s collaborative work in the RECAST platform trial for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a biologically heterogeneous, non-invasive breast condition that can progress to invasive breast cancer in a subset of patients.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

RECAST is a multi-arm, Phase 2, randomized, neoadjuvant platform trial designed to identify which patients with hormone receptor–positive DCIS are best suited for active surveillance and to determine whether novel endocrine therapies can expand the population that can safely avoid surgery. The trial includes arms evaluating standard therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) as well as novel agents: (Z)-Endoxifen, elacestrant, and Hav-088. Efficacy is assessed with mammography and breast MRI, alongside biomarker discovery and quality-of-life endpoints. Enrollment began in January 2024; 50 patients have been enrolled toward a target of 400 across 17 activated clinical sites, with additional sites planned.

Why this matters for investors

Large, under-served market: DCIS is commonly treated like invasive cancer (surgery ± radiation ± endocrine therapy). Demonstrating that a biomarker-guided, non-surgical approach is safe and effective could reshape standard of care and expand use of oral endocrine agents in early-stage disease management.
Efficient signal-finding: The platform design enables parallel testing of multiple agents, including Atossa’s (Z)-Endoxifen, with common imaging and biomarker endpoints to generate comparative signals that can inform registration strategies.
Multiple potential catalysts: Early imaging response, biomarker correlation, and active-surveillance suitability rates by arm create interim readout opportunities that can de-risk later-stage programs and guide payer-relevant health-economic modeling.
Strategic collaborations: RECAST is sponsored by Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative with research support from NIH and industry partners. This shared-infrastructure model can accelerate enrollment, broaden site access, and optimize capital efficiency.
"RECAST is purpose-built to answer the question that payers, physicians, and patients care most about: who truly needs surgery and who does not," said Steven Quay, MD, PhD, Chairman and CEO of Atossa Therapeutics. "For Atossa, the trial offers a capital-efficient path to demonstrate the potential of (Z)-Endoxifen in a large early-disease setting, generate decision-grade biomarkers, and position us for value-creating milestones over the coming quarters."

RECAST Trial Objectives

Increase the fraction of DCIS patients suitable for long-term active surveillance using novel endocrine therapy.
Correlate risk of progression to invasive ductal carcinoma with risk categorization after six months of therapy.
Identify biomarkers that predict response and elucidate mechanisms of imaging response and resistance.
Assess quality of life compared with standard endocrine therapy.
Current Trial Status

Phase: 2 (platform)
Population: HR-positive DCIS (any grade)
Arms: Tamoxifen/AI (control), (Z)-Endoxifen, elacestrant, Hav-088
Assessments: Mammogram, MRI, biomarker panels, QoL
Enrollment: 50/400; 17 active U.S. sites; additional site activations planned.

(Press release, Atossa Therapeutics, OCT 21, 2025, View Source [SID1234656881])

Breakthrough clinical trial confirms that GammaTile delivers superior tumor control compared to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed operable brain metastases

On October 21, 2025 GT Medical Technologies, a company focused on improving the lives of patients with brain tumors, reported the interim results from its ROADS clinical trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of Resection [Surgery] and GammaTile versus Standard of Care) in patients with operable, newly diagnosed brain metastases.1

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The trial, which completed randomization of 230 patients over 30 leading cancer centers in the United States in August 2025, evaluated whether implanting GammaTile – a form of brain tumor radiation that begins immediately at the time of surgery, with no waiting or time lost – could improve outcomes compared with the current standard of care (surgery followed by postoperative external beam stereotactic radiation therapy [SRT]). The standard approach requires a recovery period before radiation can begin, during which remaining microscopic tumor cells may regrow.

The trial was led by Dr. Thomas Beckham, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, and Dr. Jeffrey Weinberg, Professor of Neurosurgery, Deputy Chair and Vice-Chair of Clinical Operations in The Department of Neurosurgery at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The interim data, presented at the 2025 Congress of Neurological Surgeons by Dr. Weinberg, shows significant and durable improvements in reducing tumor recurrence and increasing surgical bed recurrence-free survival (time to tumor recurrence or death) with GammaTile.

Key Interim Findings

A pre-planned interim analysis was conducted with 168 enrolled patients:1*

GammaTile showed superiority in the primary endpoint of the study. Patients who received GammaTile lived longer without tumor regrowth, and there was a greater than 50% reduction in risk of either tumor recurrence or death compared to standard of care [SRT] (hazard ratio 0.42, p=0.0024).
GammaTile showed superiority in overall protection from worrisome radiographic brain changes (either tumor recurrence or radiation-related tissue damage). At the time of analysis, more than half of GammaTile patients remained free from both tumor regrowth and radiation-related tissue damage, while in the SRT group, more than half of patients had already experienced one of these events by 16 months (hazard ratio of 0.32, p=0.018).
GammaTile demonstrated significant gains in efficacy with no increase in safety concerns. Rates of treatment-related side effects remained low and comparable between both groups proving GammaTile delivers superior outcomes without added risk.
"The interim data from the ROADS trial is the first randomized, multicenter evidence showing the superiority of starting radiation immediately at the time of tumor removal with GammaTile for operable brain metastases," says Michael Garcia, MD, MS, Chief Medical Officer at GT Medical Technologies. "These results highlight the importance of immediate, targeted radiation therapy."

"Although the ROADS trial focused on patients with operable brain metastases, the study reflects real-world treatment patterns, where many patients have a large metastasis that needs surgery and small brain metastases that can be well managed with stereotactic radiation without removal," said Weinberg. "In such cases, patients randomized to the GammaTile arm received GammaTile radiation for the operable tumor and stereotactic radiation for the small metastases. These interim results suggest that this approach not only achieves local control but does so with superiority over the existing standard of care. My colleague, Dr. Beckham, and I agree this evidence may redefine how we treat this disease."

The Brain Metastases Challenge

Brain metastases affect up to 40% of all cancer patients and significantly impact survival and quality of life.2 For patients with operable tumors, surgery followed by external beam stereotactic radiation has been the standard of care, yet its limitations are well recognized, with a 1-year tumor recurrence rate of 28%.3 In addition, up to one third of patients miss or delay postoperative radiation due to access barriers, fragmented care pathways, or logistical challenges.4 These treatment gaps leave patients vulnerable to recurrence, decline in brain function, and added burden for families.

GammaTile is designed to overcome these shortcomings by delivering immediate, targeted, and continuous radiation directly into the surgical cavity at the time of tumor removal.5 This ensures that radiation therapy begins when microscopic cancer cells are the most vulnerable—immediately after surgery, at the lowest point of tumor burden—and guarantees that every patient receives radiation treatment. By closing the treatment gap, GammaTile provides more durable tumor control, reduces recurrence risk, and streamlines the care journey for patients.1 Importantly, GammaTile also gives patients and clinicians peace of mind that treatment has started right at tumor removal.

"We are deeply encouraged by these results," said Per Langoe, Chief Executive Officer of GT Medical Technologies. "By providing immediate radiation when and where it is needed most, GammaTile is showing the potential to transform outcomes for patients with operable brain tumors."

(Press release, GT Medical Technologies, OCT 21, 2025, View Source [SID1234656880])

PADCEV™ (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) Plus KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) sBLA Granted FDA Priority Review for Treatment of Certain Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

On October 21, 2025 Astellas Pharma Inc. (TSE: 4503, President and CEO: Naoki Okamura, "Astellas") reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted for priority review a supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) in combination with KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) as a neoadjuvant treatment (before surgery) and then continued after radical cystectomy as adjuvant treatment (after surgery) for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), the FDA has set a target action date of April 7, 2026.

The sBLA submission was based on results from the pivotal Phase 3 EV-303 clinical trial (also known as KEYNOTE-905) evaluating PADCEV, a Nectin-4 directed antibody-drug conjugate, in combination with KEYTRUDA, a PD-1 inhibitor, as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment versus surgery alone, the current standard of care. Detailed results from EV-303, which showed the combination reduced the risk of recurrence, progression or death by 60% and the risk of death by 50% compared to surgery alone, were presented at the 2025 European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) Congress. The safety results in EV-303 were consistent with those previously reported for this combination, and no new safety signals were identified.

About the EV-303/KEYNOTE-905 Trial
The EV-303 trial (also known as KEYNOTE-905) is an ongoing, open-label, randomized, three-arm, controlled, Phase 3 study evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant PADCEV in combination with KEYTRUDA or neoadjuvant and adjuvant KEYTRUDA versus surgery alone in patients with MIBC who are either not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either neoadjuvant and adjuvant KEYTRUDA (arm A), surgery alone (arm B) or neoadjuvant and adjuvant PADCEV in combination with KEYTRUDA (arm C).1

The primary endpoint of this trial is event-free survival (EFS) between arm C and arm B, defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes radical cystectomy (RC) surgery or failure to undergo RC surgery in participants with residual disease, gross residual disease left behind at the time of surgery, local or distant recurrence as assessed by imaging and/or biopsy or death due to any cause. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate between arm C and arm B, as well as EFS, OS and pCR rate between arm A and arm B.1

For more information on the global EV-303 trial, go to clinicaltrials.gov.

About Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, diagnosed in more than 614,000 people each year globally, including an estimated 85,000 people in the U.S.2,3 MIBC represents approximately 30% of all bladder cancer cases.4 The standard treatment for patients with MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery, which has been shown to prolong survival.5 However, up to half of patients with MIBC are not eligible to receive cisplatin and face limited treatment options, typically undergoing surgery without any systemic treatment.6

About PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin)
PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that is directed against Nectin-4, a protein located on the surface of cells and highly expressed in bladder cancer.7 Nonclinical data suggest the anticancer activity of PADCEV is due to its binding to Nectin-4-expressing cells, followed by the internalization and release of the anti-tumor agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) into the cell, which result in the cell not reproducing (cell cycle arrest) and in programmed cell death (apoptosis).8

PADCEV plus KEYTRUDA is approved for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) regardless of cisplatin eligibility in the United States, the European Union, Japan and a number of other countries around the world. PADCEV is also approved as a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with la/mUC who have previously received a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and platinum-containing chemotherapy or are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and have previously received one or more prior lines of therapy.8

PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) U.S. Indication & Important Safety Information

BOXED WARNING: SERIOUS SKIN REACTIONS 

PADCEV can cause severe and fatal cutaneous adverse reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), which occurred predominantly during the first cycle of treatment, but may occur later.
Closely monitor patients for skin reactions.
Immediately withhold PADCEV and consider referral for specialized care for suspected SJS or TEN or severe skin reactions.
Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients with confirmed SJS or TEN; or Grade 4 or recurrent Grade 3 skin reactions.
Indication 
PADCEV, in combination with pembrolizumab, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). 

PADCEV, as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or mUC who: 

have previously received a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor and platinum-containing chemotherapy, or
are ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and have previously received one or more prior lines of therapy.
PADCEV Important Safety Information 

Warnings and Precautions 

Skin reactions Severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including fatal cases of SJS or TEN occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. SJS and TEN occurred predominantly during the first cycle of treatment but may occur later. Skin reactions occurred in 70% (all grades) of the 564 patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab in clinical trials. When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, the incidence of skin reactions, including severe events, occurred at a higher rate compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The majority of the skin reactions that occurred with combination therapy included maculo-papular rash, macular rash and papular rash. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 17% of patients (Grade 3: 16%, Grade 4: 1%), including maculo-papular rash, bullous dermatitis, dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, pemphigoid, rash, erythematous rash, macular rash, and papular rash. A fatal reaction of bullous dermatitis occurred in one patient (0.2%). The median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 1.7 months (range: 0.1 to 17.2 months). Skin reactions led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 6% of patients. 

Skin reactions occurred in 58% (all grades) of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials. Twenty-three percent (23%) of patients had maculo-papular rash and 34% had pruritus. Grade 3-4 skin reactions occurred in 14% of patients, including maculo-papular rash, erythematous rash, rash or drug eruption, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), bullous dermatitis, exfoliative dermatitis, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The median time to onset of severe skin reactions was 0.6 months (range: 0.1 to 8 months). Among patients experiencing a skin reaction leading to dose interruption who then restarted PADCEV (n=75), 24% of patients restarting at the same dose and 24% of patients restarting at a reduced dose experienced recurrent severe skin reactions. Skin reactions led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 3.1% of patients. 

Monitor patients closely throughout treatment for skin reactions. Consider topical corticosteroids and antihistamines, as clinically indicated. For persistent or recurrent Grade 2 skin reactions, consider withholding PADCEV until Grade ≤1. Withhold PADCEV and refer for specialized care for suspected SJS, TEN or for Grade 3 skin reactions. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients with confirmed SJS or TEN; or Grade 4 or recurrent Grade 3 skin reactions. 

Hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), including fatal events, occurred in patients with and without pre-existing diabetes mellitus, treated with PADCEV. Patients with baseline hemoglobin A1C ≥8% were excluded from clinical trials. In clinical trials of PADCEV as a single agent, 17% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV developed hyperglycemia of any grade; 7% of patients developed Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia (Grade 3: 6.5%, Grade 4: 0.6%). Fatal events of hyperglycemia and DKA occurred in one patient each (0.1%). The incidence of Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia increased consistently in patients with higher body mass index and in patients with higher baseline A1C. The median time to onset of hyperglycemia was 0.5 months (range: 0 to 20 months). Hyperglycemia led to discontinuation of PADCEV in 0.7% of patients. Five percent (5%) of patients required initiation of insulin therapy for treatment of hyperglycemia. Of the patients who initiated insulin therapy for treatment of hyperglycemia, 66% (23/35) discontinued insulin at the time of last evaluation. Closely monitor blood glucose levels in patients with, or at risk for, diabetes mellitus or hyperglycemia. If blood glucose is elevated (>250 mg/dL), withhold PADCEV. 

Pneumonitis/Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Severe, life-threatening or fatal pneumonitis/ILD occurred in patients treated with PADCEV. When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, 10% of the 564 patients treated with combination therapy had pneumonitis/ILD of any grade and 4% had Grade 3-4. A fatal event of pneumonitis/ILD occurred in two patients (0.4%). The incidence of pneumonitis/ILD, including severe events, occurred at a higher rate when PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The median time to onset of any grade pneumonitis/ILD was 4 months (range: 0.3 to 26 months). 

In clinical trials of PADCEV as a single agent, 3% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV had pneumonitis/ILD of any grade and 0.8% had Grade 3-4. The median time to onset of any grade pneumonitis/ILD was 2.9 months (range: 0.6 to 6 months). 

Monitor patients for signs and symptoms indicative of pneumonitis/ILD such as hypoxia, cough, dyspnea or interstitial infiltrates on radiologic exams. Evaluate and exclude infectious, neoplastic and other causes for such signs and symptoms through appropriate investigations. Withhold PADCEV for patients who develop Grade 2 pneumonitis/ILD and consider dose reduction. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in all patients with Grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis/ILD. 

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) When PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab, 67% of the 564 patients treated with combination therapy had PN of any grade, 36% had Grade 2 neuropathy, and 7% had Grade 3 neuropathy. The incidence of PN occurred at a higher rate when PADCEV was given in combination with pembrolizumab compared to PADCEV as a single agent. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 PN was 6 months (range: 0.3 to 25 months). 

PN occurred in 53% of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials including 38% with sensory neuropathy, 8% with muscular weakness and 7% with motor neuropathy. Thirty percent of patients experienced Grade 2 reactions and 5% experienced Grade 3-4 reactions. PN occurred in patients treated with PADCEV with or without preexisting PN. The median time to onset of Grade ≥2 PN was 4.9 months (range: 0.1 to 20 months). Neuropathy led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of patients. 

Monitor patients for symptoms of new or worsening PN and consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV when PN occurs. Permanently discontinue PADCEV in patients who develop Grade ≥3 PN. 

Ocular disorders were reported in 40% of the 384 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials in which ophthalmologic exams were scheduled. The majority of these events involved the cornea and included events associated with dry eye such as keratitis, blurred vision, increased lacrimation, conjunctivitis, limbal stem cell deficiency, and keratopathy. Dry eye symptoms occurred in 30% of patients, and blurred vision occurred in 10% of patients, during treatment with PADCEV. The median time to onset to symptomatic ocular disorder was 1.7 months (range: 0 to 30.6 months). Monitor patients for ocular disorders. Consider artificial tears for prophylaxis of dry eyes and ophthalmologic evaluation if ocular symptoms occur or do not resolve. Consider treatment with ophthalmic topical steroids, if indicated after an ophthalmic exam. Consider dose interruption or dose reduction of PADCEV for symptomatic ocular disorders. 

Infusion site extravasation Skin and soft tissue reactions secondary to extravasation have been observed after administration of PADCEV. Of the 720 patients treated with PADCEV as a single agent in clinical trials, 1% of patients experienced skin and soft tissue reactions, including 0.3% who experienced Grade 3-4 reactions. Reactions may be delayed. Erythema, swelling, increased temperature, and pain worsened until 2-7 days after extravasation and resolved within 1-4 weeks of peak. Two patients (0.3%) developed extravasation reactions with secondary cellulitis, bullae, or exfoliation. Ensure adequate venous access prior to starting PADCEV and monitor for possible extravasation during administration. If extravasation occurs, stop the infusion and monitor for adverse reactions. 

Embryo-fetal toxicity PADCEV can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise patients of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise female patients of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during PADCEV treatment and for 2 months after the last dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with PADCEV and for 4 months after the last dose. 

ADVERSE REACTIONS 

Most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab) 
Increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), increased creatinine, rash, increased glucose, PN, increased lipase, decreased lymphocytes, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), decreased hemoglobin, fatigue, decreased sodium, decreased phosphate, decreased albumin, pruritus, diarrhea, alopecia, decreased weight, decreased appetite, increased urate, decreased neutrophils, decreased potassium, dry eye, nausea, constipation, increased potassium, dysgeusia, urinary tract infection and decreased platelets. 

Most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities (≥20%) (PADCEV monotherapy) 
Increased glucose, increased AST, decreased lymphocytes, increased creatinine, rash, fatigue, PN, decreased albumin, decreased hemoglobin, alopecia, decreased appetite, decreased neutrophils, decreased sodium, increased ALT, decreased phosphate, diarrhea, nausea, pruritus, increased urate, dry eye, dysgeusia, constipation, increased lipase, decreased weight, decreased platelets, abdominal pain, dry skin. 

EV-302 Study: 440 patients with previously untreated la/mUC (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab) 
Serious adverse reactions occurred in 50% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab. The most common serious adverse reactions (≥2%) were rash (6%), acute kidney injury (5%), pneumonitis/ILD (4.5%), urinary tract infection (3.6%), diarrhea (3.2%), pneumonia (2.3%), pyrexia (2%), and hyperglycemia (2%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3.9% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab including acute respiratory failure (0.7%), pneumonia (0.5%), and pneumonitis/ILD (0.2%). 

Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PADCEV occurred in 35% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to discontinuation of PADCEV were PN (15%), rash (4.1%) and pneumonitis/ILD (2.3%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of PADCEV occurred in 73% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose interruption of PADCEV were PN (22%), rash (16%), COVID19 (10%), diarrhea (5%), pneumonitis/ILD (4.8%), fatigue (3.9%), hyperglycemia (3.6%), increased ALT (3%) and pruritus (2.5%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction of PADCEV occurred in 42% of patients. The most common adverse reactions (≥2%) leading to dose reduction of PADCEV were rash (16%), PN (13%) and fatigue (2.7%). 

EV-103 Study: 121 patients with previously untreated la/mUC who were not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab) 
Serious adverse reactions occurred in 50% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab; the most common (≥2%) were acute kidney injury (7%), urinary tract infection (7%), urosepsis (5%), sepsis (3.3%), pneumonia (3.3%), hematuria (3.3%), pneumonitis/ILD (3.3%), urinary retention (2.5%), diarrhea (2.5%), myasthenia gravis (2.5%), myositis (2.5%), anemia (2.5%), and hypotension (2.5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 5% of patients treated with PADCEV in combination with pembrolizumab, including sepsis (1.6%), bullous dermatitis (0.8%), myasthenia gravis (0.8%), and pneumonitis/ILD (0.8%). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PADCEV occurred in 36% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (20%) and rash (6%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption of PADCEV occurred in 69% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (18%), rash (12%), increased lipase (6%), pneumonitis/ILD (6%), diarrhea (4.1%), acute kidney injury (3.3%), increased ALT (3.3%), fatigue (3.3%), neutropenia (3.3%), urinary tract infection (3.3%), increased amylase (2.5%), anemia (2.5%), COVID19 (2.5%), hyperglycemia (2.5%), and hypotension (2.5%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction of PADCEV occurred in 45% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (17%), rash (12%), fatigue (5%), neutropenia (5%), and diarrhea (4.1%). 

EV-301 Study: 296 patients previously treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy (PADCEV monotherapy) 
Serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients treated with PADCEV; the most common (≥2%) were urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury (7% each), and pneumonia (5%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 3% of patients, including multiorgan dysfunction (1%), hepatic dysfunction, septic shock, hyperglycemia, pneumonitis/ILD, and pelvic abscess (0.3% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 17% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (5%) and rash (4%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 61% of patients; the most common (≥4%) were PN (23%), rash (11%), and fatigue (9%). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 34% of patients; the most common (≥2%) were PN (10%), rash (8%), decreased appetite, and fatigue (3% each). 

EV-201, Cohort 2 Study: 89 patients previously treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor and not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PADCEV monotherapy) 
Serious adverse reactions occurred in 39% of patients treated with PADCEV; the most common (≥3%) were pneumonia, sepsis, and diarrhea (5% each). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 8% of patients, including acute kidney injury (2.2%), metabolic acidosis, sepsis, multiorgan dysfunction, pneumonia, and pneumonitis/ILD (1.1% each). Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 20% of patients; the most common (≥2%) was PN (7%). Adverse reactions leading to dose interruption occurred in 60% of patients; the most common (≥3%) were PN (19%), rash (9%), fatigue (8%), diarrhea (5%), increased AST, and hyperglycemia (3% each). Adverse reactions leading to dose reduction occurred in 49% of patients; the most common (≥3%) were PN (19%), rash (11%), and fatigue (7%). 

DRUG INTERACTIONS 
Effects of other drugs on PADCEV (Dual P-gp and Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors) 
Concomitant use with dual P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase unconjugated monomethyl auristatin E exposure, which may increase the incidence or severity of PADCEV toxicities. Closely monitor patients for signs of toxicity when PADCEV is given concomitantly with dual P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. 

SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 
Lactation Advise lactating women not to breastfeed during treatment with PADCEV and for 3 weeks after the last dose. 

Hepatic impairment Avoid the use of PADCEV in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment. 

(Press release, Astellas Pharma, OCT 22, 2025, View Source [SID1234656879])