Greenwich LifeSciences Publishes Additional Positive Safety Data from GP2 Phase IIb Trial at ASCO 2021, Confirming that GP2 Treatment to Prevent Metastatic Breast Cancer Recurrence is Well Tolerated

On June 7, 2021 Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GLSI) (the "Company"), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of GP2, an immunotherapy to prevent breast cancer recurrences in patients who have previously undergone surgery, reported an abstract and poster of the final 5 year GP2 Phase IIb clinical trial safety data at the 2021 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting (Press release, Greenwich LifeSciences, JUN 7, 2021, View Source [SID1234583638]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The abstract can be viewed at the bottom of this press release, and the full poster, Figures 1-2, Tables 1-2, and an audio track of the poster by VP of Clinical & Regulatory Affairs Jaye Thompson can be accessed and downloaded at: View Source

It has been previously reported that the completion of the GP2 immunotherapy (GP2+GM-CSF) Primary Immunization Series (PIS) reduced recurrence rates to 0% over a 5 year follow-up period in HER2 3+ patients who had received a standard course of trastuzumab after surgery. The abstract and poster present the final safety data over the 5 year follow-up period, assessing the safety of GP2 immunotherapy and its relationship to previously presented peak immunity and recurrence rate data.

Summary of the Final 5 Year Safety Data:

GP2 immunotherapy is well-tolerated and no safety signal for GP2 was identified. Additionally, no serious adverse events related to GP2 immunotherapy were reported over the full 5 year treatment and follow-up periods.
The majority of patients experienced mild or moderate injection site reactions, which accounted for approximately 70% of reported adverse events.
The incidence of adverse events was similar across HER2 3+ and HER2 1-2+ breast cancer patients, consistent with the previously reported findings that the immune response was similar across both patient populations, suggesting that GP2 immunotherapy could be a potential treatment in HER2 1-2+ patients or in other HER2 expressing cancers.
Snehal Patel, CEO of Greenwich LifeSciences, commented, "The final 5 year analysis of the safety data in the Phase IIb trial is now complete and represents an important milestone for the Company. With the recurrence rate or disease free survival (SABCS 2020), immune response (AACR 2021), and now safety data (ASCO 2021), the final design of the planned Phase III trial can be completed. This final combined data set encourages us to utilize the same treatment strategy in the planned Phase III trial to conservatively reproduce these promising results that showed that GP2 immunotherapy may prevent metastatic breast cancer recurrence. In addition, this final data set can now be presented to investors and strategic parties interested in partnering with the Company to co-develop and license GP2."

Excerpts from the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Poster 542:

Title: Final five year median follow-up safety data from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, phase IIb study evaluating the use of HER2/neu peptide GP2 + GM-CSF vs. GM-CSF alone after adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2 positive women with operable breast cancer

Safety data was analyzed to assess injection site reactions and systemic adverse events (AEs) of each treatment arm. Most patients completed the planned PIS: 81 (91.0%) GP2+GM-CSF and 86 (94.5%) GM-CSF only. In addition, 77 GP2+GM-CSF and 80 GM-CSF only patients received all 4 booster injections. The most common injection site reactions were erythema, induration and pruritis, and they occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment arms. Injection site reactions were reported by almost all patients over the course of vaccinations. Occurring in a smaller percentage of patients, the most common systemic adverse events were fatigue, headache, and myalgia/arthralgia, again with similar incidence by treatment arm. The majority of all events reported were of grade 1, mild severity. Five GP2+GM-CSF patients reported 6 events considered definitely, possibly or probably related to study medication, which were grade 3 or 4: induration (2), urticaria, rash, pruritis, and arthralgia. Urticaria, allergic reaction and hypersensitivity reaction were considered possibly related events of grade 3 or 4 in GM-CSF only patients. No serious adverse events considered related to study medication were reported over the full 5 year treatment and follow-up periods.

Figure 2 of the poster shows the maximal severity grade for any adverse event, systemic and injection site reaction, for each patient. There was no difference between the two treatment arms. The majority of events were of grade 1, mild severity. Two patients reported grade 4 adverse events deemed unrelated to GP2 immunotherapy. One GP2+GM-CSF patient experienced grade 4 hypoglycemia and recovered. A GM-CSF only patient was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma, a second primary diagnosis, which was classified as grade 4.

Tables 1 & 2 of the poster show the incidence of adverse events by HER2 status. The first occurrence of frequently reported adverse events are tabulated in Table 1. The most common adverse event was injection site reaction. Almost every patient, in both the GP2+GM-CSF and GM-CSF only arms, reported injection site reactions. The most frequent injection site reactions were erythema, pruritus and induration, as presented in Table 2. The incidence of adverse events were similar across HER2 3+ and HER2 1-2+ patients, which is consistent with the previously reported findings that immune response was similar across HER2 3+ and HER2 1-2+ patients.

ASCO Abstract 542:

Title: Final five-year median follow-up safety data from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, phase IIb study evaluating the use of HER2/neu peptide GP2 + GM-CSF vs. GM-CSF alone after adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2 positive women with operable breast cancer.

Snehal Patel, David McWilliams, Christine T Fischette, Jaye Thompson, Mira Patel, and F Joseph Daugherty.

Greenwich LifeSciences, Stafford, TX

Background: The final analysis of the GP2 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded, multicenter Phase IIb trial investigating GP2+GM-CSF administered in the adjuvant setting to node-positive and high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients with tumors expressing any degree of HER2 (immuno-histochemistry [IHC] 1-3+) (NCT00524277) is now complete with 5 year follow-up. The trial enrolled HLA-A02 patients randomized to receive GP2+GM-CSF versus GM-CSF alone. It was previously reported that completion of the GP2+GM-CSF Primary Immunization Series (PIS) reduced recurrence rates to 0% over a 5 year follow-up period in HER2 3+ patients, who received a standard course of trastuzumab after surgery.

Methods: Each enrolled and consented patient was randomly scheduled to receive a total of 6 GP2+GM-CSF (500 mcg GP2: 125 mcg GM-CSF) or GM-CSF only intradermal injections every 3-4 weeks as part of the PIS for the first 6 months and 4 GP2+GM-CSF or GM-CSF only booster intradermal injections every 6 months thereafter. Boosters were introduced during the trial, thus some patients did not receive all 4 boosters. Injection sight reactions were measured.

Results: Safety data was analyzed to assess local and systemic toxicity of each treatment arm. Most subjects completed the planned PIS, 81 (91.0%) GP2+GM-CSF and 86 (94.5%) GM-CSF only. In addition, 77 GP2+GM-CSF and 80 GM-CSF only subjects received all 4 booster injections. The most common local toxicities were erythema, induration and pruritis and they occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment arms. Local reactions were reported by almost all subjects over the course of vaccinations. Occurring in a smaller percentage of subjects, the most common systemic toxicities were fatigue, headache, and myalgia/arthralgia, again with similar incidence by treatment group. The majority of all events reported were of Grade 1 mild severity (GP2+GM-CSF 92.5%, GM-CSF only 90.6%). Only 5 events in 4 subjects were considered Grade 3: induration and maculopapular rash/pruritis, in two GP2+GM-CSF subjects and chest pain and hypersensitivity reaction in two GM-CSF only subjects. The incidence of local reactions minimally increased with subsequent vaccinations; however, the types of events remain unchanged. No serious adverse events were reported over the full 5 year treatment and follow-up periods.

Conclusions: The study confirms the finding from the Phase I trial evaluating GP2+GM-CSF that the vaccine is safe and well-tolerated. The majority of patients experienced only mild local and systemic toxicities. Importantly, toxicities in the GP2+GM-CSF group were comparable to those seen in the GM-CSF only group, suggesting the toxicities are attributable to GM-CSF.

About the 2021 ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting

Founded in 1964, ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) is the world’s leading professional organization for physicians and oncology professionals caring for people with cancer. ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) offers premier scientific events for oncology professionals, patient advocates, industry representatives, and major media outlets worldwide. The ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting program features poster presentations, poster discussion sessions, clinical science symposia, and dynamic education sessions about recent advancements in cancer research, treatment, and patient care. For more information, please visit the conference website at: View Source

About Breast Cancer and HER2/neu Positivity

One in eight U.S. women will develop invasive breast cancer over her lifetime, with approximately 266,000 new breast cancer patients and 3.1 million breast cancer survivors in 2018. HER2/neu (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) protein is a cell surface receptor protein that is expressed in a variety of common cancers, including in 75% of breast cancers at low (1+), intermediate (2+), and high (3+ or over-expressor) levels.

Transactions in connection with share buy-back program

On June 7, 2021 Genmab A/S (Nasdaq: GMAB) reported the initiation of a share buy-back program to mitigate dilution from warrant exercises and to honor our commitments under our Restricted Stock Units program (Press release, Genmab, JUN 7, 2021, View Source [SID1234583637]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The share buy-back program is expected to be completed no later than June 30, 2021 and comprises up to 200,000 shares.
Details of each transaction are included as an appendix to this announcement.

Following these transactions, Genmab holds 264,306 shares as treasury shares, corresponding to 0.40% of the total share capital and voting rights.

The share buy-back program is undertaken in accordance with Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014 (‘MAR’) and the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052, also referred to as the "Safe Harbour Regulation." Further details on the terms of the share buy-back program can be found in our company announcement no. 11 dated February 23, 2021.

Interim results for the six months ended 31 March

On June 7, 2021 Redx (AIM: REDX), the drug discovery and development Group focused on cancer and fibrosis, reported that unaudited results for the six months ended 31 March 2021 (Press release, Redx Pharma, JUN 7, 2021, View Source [SID1234583636]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Operational Highlights

· Successfully completed dosing of the first four patient cohorts in the Phase 1 clinical trial of lead oncology asset, RXC004 (porcupine inhibitor)

o Final patient cohort, at 3 mg initiated and ongoing, following recruitment delays of around six months arising from COVID-19.

o Company remains on track to report the Phase 1 clinical study results at a scientific meeting, as well as initiate multiple Phase 2 studies in H2 2021.

o Post-period, in April 2021, initiated dosing of the first patient cohort with a combination of RXC004 and nivolumab (OPDIVO – Bristol Myers Squibb, an anti-PD-1 antibody immune checkpoint inhibitor).

· Post period, on 3 June 2021, initiated second clinical programme, the first programme from our fibrosis portfolio to enter the clinic

o A healthy volunteer, Phase 1 safety study for RXC007, a selective Rho Associated Coiled-Coil Containing Protein Kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor for development in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and potentially other fibrotic conditions. Results from the study are expected to be available in H1 2022.

· Significantly progressed our partnered programs with Jazz Pharmaceuticals

o Generated revenue of £0.8m during the period from the ongoing research collaboration on the pan-RAF programme, announced in July 2019.

o A further £1.3 million of revenue recognised from the collaboration deal to conduct an oncology research collaboration designed to discover new medicines targeted at two specified targets on the MAPK pathway.

· Dr Jane Robertson appointed Chief Medical Officer on 1 March 2021.

· On 1 May 2021, Peter Collum was appointed as Chief Financial Officer and will be US-based, in the New York area; he succeeds Dr James Mead who has transitioned to the role of Chief Operating Officer.

· On 19 May 2021, Natalie Berner was appointed as a Non-Executive Director representing RM Special Holdings 3 LLP, an affiliate of Redmile Group, LLC.

· On 31 May 2021, Iain Ross stepped down from his role as Director and Non-Executive Chairman of the Company.

· On 4 June 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as auditor for the financial year ending 30 September 2021.

Financial Highlights

· Cash balance at 31 March 2021 of £39.9 million (31 March 2020 £1.9 million) providing cash runway through 2022.

· Financing completed in December 2020, raising £25.7 million (gross), in addition to £5.1 million of the £22.2 million outstanding loan note liability converted to Ordinary shares.

· Increasing investment in research and development by £6.2 million, reflecting the strong progress in our pipeline, led to increased operating expenses of £12.6 million (H1 2020 £5.2 million).

· Loss for the period of £12.7 million (H1 2020 £4.0 million)

Lisa Anson, Chief Executive of Redx Pharma, commented; "We continue to make strong progress with our pipeline, with drug candidates from both our oncology and fibrosis programmes now in the clinic following RXC007, our ROCK2 selective inhibitor, initiating clinical trials. Furthermore, we expect to progress RXC004, our lead oncology asset, into Phase 2 studies in the second half of 2021, once we complete the Phase 1 study currently in the final patient cohort. We continue to be excited by the differentiated programmes in our growing pipeline and look forward to further progress at Redx ."

For the purposes of MAR, the person responsible for arranging for the release of this announcement on behalf of Redx is Andrew Booth, Company Secretary.

Calquence demonstrated fewer incidences of atrial fibrillation versus ibrutinib in previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and sustained patient benefit at four years in the front-line setting

On June 7, 2021 AstraZeneca reported that Final results from the head-to-head ELEVATE-RR Phase III trial of Calquence (acalabrutinib) demonstrated non-inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and statistically significantly fewer events of atrial fibrillation versus ibrutinib in adults with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), the most common type of leukaemia in adults (Press release, AstraZeneca, JUN 7, 2021, View Source [SID1234583635]).1

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Separately, updated results at four years of follow up from the ELEVATE-TN Phase III trial continued to show a strong PFS benefit for Calquence as combination therapy or as monotherapy in previously untreated patients with CLL.

At a median follow up of 40.9 months, the ELEVATE-RR trial met its primary endpoint of PFS non-inferiority versus ibrutinib with a median PFS of 38.4 months in both arms (based on a hazard ratio [HR] of 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.27). Patients treated with Calquence had a statistically significantly lower incidence of all-grade atrial fibrillation compared with patients treated with ibrutinib (9.4% versus 16.0%), a key secondary endpoint.2 Atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart rate that can increase the risk of stroke, heart failure and other heart-related complications.3

John C. Byrd, MD, Distinguished University Professor, The Ohio State University, and lead investigator of the ELEVATE-RR trial, said: "Cardiac adverse events are an important consideration for treating chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors because they can produce significant morbidity in some cases and also lead patients to discontinue treatment. These data provide compelling evidence that acalabrutinib is a more tolerable option with reduced cardiovascular toxicity and overall fewer discontinuations due to adverse events, giving clinicians further reassurance when prescribing this medicine that patients can stay on treatment while maintaining ongoing control of their disease."

Dave Fredrickson, Executive Vice President, Oncology Business Unit, said: "Tolerability is a critical factor in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who often remain on medicines for many years and experience multiple comorbidities. The totality of the Calquence data at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) confirm our confidence in the favourable benefit-risk profile of this medicine, with over 40 months of follow up in each of these two trials. Together, the results provide strong evidence that Calquence is a preferred option for people living with this chronic and devastating disease."

The results of both trials were presented during the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting on 7 June 2021.

ELEVATE-RR: Calquence versus ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory CLL
ELEVATE-RR (ACE-CL-006) is the first Phase III trial to compare two Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in patients with previously treated CLL with presence of 17p deletion or presence of 11q deletion.2 The trial met the non-inferiority endpoint for PFS defined by the trial for Calquence (n=268) versus ibrutinib (n=265) in patients with previously treated CLL with certain high-risk prognostic factors.2

Patients treated with Calquence had statistically significantly lower incidence of all-grade atrial fibrillation, a key secondary endpoint, compared with patients treated with ibrutinib (9.4% [n=25/266] versus 16.0% [n=42/263]; p=0.02).2

A lower frequency of adverse events (AEs) was observed with Calquence versus ibrutinib including lower common AEs, Grade 3 or higher AEs, serious AEs, treatment discontinuations due to AEs and overall cardiac events.2 The safety and tolerability of Calquence in ELEVATE-RR was consistent with the known profile of Calquence.

Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 14.7% of patients on Calquence and 21.3% of patients on ibrutinib. AEs of clinical interest for Calquence versus ibrutinib included cardiac events (all grade, 24.1%, and 30.0%, respectively), bleeding events (all grade, 38.0% and 51.3%, respectively), hypertension (all grade, 9.4% and 23.2%, respectively), infections (all grade, 78.2% and 81.4%, respectively), interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (all grade, 2.6% and 6.5%, respectively) and second primary malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (all-grade, 9.0% and 7.6%, respectively).2 Serious AEs (any grade) occurred in 53.8% of patients on Calquence versus 58.6% of patients receiving ibrutinib.2

Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either arm, with 63 (23.5%) patients in the Calquence arm, and 73 (27.5%) patients in the ibrutinib arm experiencing an event (HR of 0.82, 95% CI 0.59-1.15).2

ELEVATE-TN: Four-year follow up for Calquence in previously untreated CLL
ELEVATE-TN (ACE-CL-007) is a randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase III trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Calquence in combination with obinutuzumab or alone versus chlorambucil in combination with obinutuzumab in previously untreated patients with CLL.4 The trial met its primary endpoint (IRC-assessed PFS with Calquence plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab) at the data cut-off for the interim analysis after a median follow up of 28.3 months.5

After a median follow up of 46.9 months, the ELEVATE-TN Phase III trial showed Calquence plus obinutuzumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 90% (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.07-0.17) and as a monotherapy by 81% (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.28) compared with chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab.4 Estimated PFS rates at 48 months for Calquence plus obinutuzumab or as monotherapy were 87% and 78%, respectively, versus 25% for chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab.4 PFS findings were consistent across high-risk subgroups.4 Median PFS was not yet reached for either Calquence arm at four years of follow up. Median OS was not reached in any treatment arm with a trend toward significance in the Calquence plus obinutuzumab group (p=0.0604).4

Summary of key efficacy results from the ELEVATE-TN trial4
Median follow up of 46.9 months (range: 0.0-59.4)

Efficacy measure

Calquence plus obinutuzumab

N=179

Calquence monotherapy

N=179

Chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab

N=177

PFS*: Overall population

Median (HR, 95% CI), months

NR

(0.10; 0.07-0.17)

NR

(0.19; 0.13-0.28)

27.8

p-value

<0.0001

<0.0001

Estimated PFS at 48 months, %

87

78

25

PFS*: Patients with del(17p) and/or mutated TP53

Median (HR, 95% CI), months

NR

(0.17; 0.07-0.42)

NR

(0.18; 0.07-0.46)

17.5

p-value

<0.0001

<0.0001

Estimated PFS at 48 months, %

75

76

18

ORR*

ORR, % (95% CI)

96.1

(92.1-98.1)

89.9

(84.7-93.5)

82.5

(76.2-87.4)

p-value

<0.0001

0.035

OS

Median (HR, 95% CI), months

NR

(0.50; 0.25-1.02)

NR

(0.95; 0.52-1.74)

NR

p-value

0.0604

0.9164

Estimated OS at 48 months, %

93

88

88

CI, confidence interval; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival
*Investigator-assessed.

The safety profile remained largely unchanged from the interim analysis at 24 months, with similar treatment discontinuation rates across arms (25.1%, 30.7% and 22.6% for Calquence plus obinutuzumab, Calquence monotherapy and chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab, respectively).4 The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were AEs (12.8%, 12.34% and 14.7%, respectively) and progressive disease (4.5%, 7.8% and 1.7%, respectively).4

Selected AEs of interest of any grade in the Calquence combination arm (n=178), Calquence monotherapy arm (n=179) and chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab arm (n=169) included cardiac events (20.8%, 19.0% and 7.7%, respectively), bleeding (47.2%, 41.9% and 11.8%, respectively), hypertension (7.9%, 7.3% and 4.1%, respectively), infections (75.3%, 73.7% and 44.4%, respectively) and second primary malignancies (15.7%, 13.4% and 4.1%, respectively).4

CLL
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is the most common type of leukaemia in adults, with an estimated 114,000 new cases globally in 2017, and the number of people living with CLL is expected to grow with improved treatment as patients live longer with the disease.1,6-8 In CLL, too many blood stem cells in the bone marrow become abnormal lymphocytes and these abnormal cells have difficulty fighting infections. As the number of abnormal cells grows there is less room for healthy white blood cells, red blood cells and platelets. This could result in anaemia, infection and bleeding.6 B-cell receptor signalling through Bruton’s tyrosine kinase is one of the essential growth pathways for CLL.

ELEVATE-RR
ELEVATE-RR (ACE-CL-006) is a randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase III non-inferiority trial of Calquence versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL after at least one prior therapy, and at least one of the following prognostic factors: presence of 17p deletion, or presence of 11q deletion. In the trial, 533 patients were randomised (1:1) into two arms. Patients in the first arm received Calquence (100mg orally twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients in the second arm received ibrutinib (420mg orally once daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.2

The primary endpoint for the trial was PFS assessed by an independent review committee (non-inferiority; tested after 250 events, HR upper margin of <1.429).2 Secondary endpoints included incidence of atrial fibrillation, incidence of Grade 3 or higher infections, incidence of Richter’s transformation (a condition in which CLL changes into an aggressive form of lymphoma) and OS.2,9

ELEVATE-TN
ELEVATE-TN (ACE-CL-007) is a randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase III trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Calquence alone or in combination with obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil in combination with obinutuzumab in previously untreated patients with CLL. In the trial, 535 patients were randomised (1:1:1) into three arms. Patients in the first arm received chlorambucil in combination with obinutuzumab. Patients in the second arm received Calquence (100mg twice daily until disease progression) in combination with obinutuzumab. Patients in the third arm received Calquence monotherapy (100mg twice daily until disease progression).4

The primary endpoint was PFS in the Calquence and obinutuzumab arm compared to the chlorambucil and obinutuzumab arm, assessed by an independent review committee (IRC), and a key secondary endpoint was IRC-assessed PFS in the Calquence monotherapy arm compared to the chlorambucil and obinutuzumab arm. Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate, time to next treatment, OS and investigator-assessed PFS.4 After interim analysis, assessments were by investigator only.4

Initial results from the ELEVATE-TN Phase III trial were presented in December 2019 at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) (Free ASH Whitepaper) Annual Meeting and Exhibition.10 The findings, along with previously reported data from the Phase III ASCEND trial in relapsed or refractory CLL, supported the approvals of Calquence by the US FDA and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration for the treatment of adult patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and by the European Union and Health Canada for CLL.

Calquence
Calquence (acalabrutinib) is a next-generation, selective inhibitor of BTK. Calquence binds covalently to BTK, thereby inhibiting its activity.11,12 In B-cells, BTK signalling results in activation of pathways necessary for B-cell proliferation, trafficking, chemotaxis, and adhesion.11

Calquence is approved for the treatment of CLL and SLL in the US, approved for CLL in the EU and several other countries worldwide, and approved in Japan for relapsed or refractory CLL and SLL. A Phase I trial is currently underway in Japan for the treatment of front-line CLL.

In the US and several other countries, Calquence is also approved for the treatment of adult patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one prior therapy. The US MCL indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials. Calquence is not currently approved for the treatment of MCL in Europe or Japan.

As part of an extensive clinical development programme, AstraZeneca and Acerta Pharma are currently evaluating Calquence in more than 20 company-sponsored clinical trials. Calquence is being evaluated for the treatment of multiple B-cell blood cancers including CLL, MCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia, follicular lymphoma and other haematologic malignancies.

AstraZeneca in haematology
AstraZeneca is pushing the boundaries of science to redefine care in haematology. Applying our deep understanding of blood cancers and leveraging our strength in solid tumour oncology, we are driving the development of novel therapies designed to target underlying drivers of disease across six scientific platforms. By addressing blood cancers with high unmet medical needs, our aim is to deliver innovative medicines and approaches to healthcare services that have a meaningful impact on patients and caregivers, transforming the haematologic cancer care experience.

AstraZeneca in oncology
AstraZeneca is leading a revolution in oncology with the ambition to provide cures for cancer in every form, following the science to understand cancer and all its complexities to discover, develop and deliver life-changing medicines to patients.

The Company’s focus is on some of the most challenging cancers. It is through persistent innovation that AstraZeneca has built one of the most diverse portfolios and pipelines in the industry, with the potential to catalyse changes in the practice of medicine and transform the patient experience.

AstraZeneca has the vision to redefine cancer care and, one day, eliminate cancer as a cause of death.

Article on CD40 agonistic antibodies published in Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

On June 7, 2021 Alligator Bioscience (Nasdaq Stockholm: ATORX) reported that the scientific journal Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy has published an article by scientists at Alligator Bioscience, reviewing the field of CD40 agonistic antibodies (Press release, Alligator Bioscience, JUN 7, 2021, View Source [SID1234583634]). The article provides an overview of the CD40 agonistic antibodies in clinical development and the current challenges and opportunities for this important class of immuno-oncology drugs.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Title: Rationale and clinical development of CD40 agonistic antibodies for cancer immunotherapy

Journal: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

Authors: Karin Enell Smith et al

"We’re very pleased to have this peer-reviewed article prepared by Alligator’s scientists published. It highlights the promising role of CD40 agonists in immuno-oncology and explains how Alligator’s CD40 agonist, mitazalimab, has best in class potential," said Søren Bregenholt, CEO of Alligator Bioscience. "We’re now looking forward to initiating the OPTIMIZE-1 Phase II study designed to assess the clinical efficacy of mitazalimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer."

Mitazalimab is an agonistic – or stimulatory – antibody that targets CD40, a receptor on dendritic cells, which are the cells that instruct T cells to kill cancer cells. Mitazalimab activates CD40 enabling dendritic cells to effectively stimulate the immune system directing T cells to selectively attack the tumor. This addresses one of the key mechanistic needs in immuno-oncology and highlights the potential of CD40 as a target to treat patients with metastatic cancer. Mitazalimab’s favorable efficacy-safety profile demonstrated in previous phase I studies, makes it ideal for combination with standard of care treatments such a chemotherapy, check-point inhibitors or cancer vaccines.