On November 15, 2018 Blueprint Medicines Corporation (NASDAQ: BPMC), a leader in discovering and developing targeted kinase medicines for patients with genomically defined diseases, reported updated data for the registration-enabling NAVIGATOR clinical trial of avapritinib, a potent and highly selective KIT and PDGFRA inhibitor in development for patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) (Press release, Blueprint Medicines, NOV 15, 2018, View Source [SID1234531353]). The data showed that avapritinib was highly active across all lines of therapy for patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST and in second-, third- and fourth-line for other GIST patients. In addition, avapritinib was well-tolerated with most adverse events (AEs) reported by investigators as Grade 1 or 2. These results will be presented today in an oral presentation at the Connective Tissue Oncology Society 2018 Annual Meeting in Rome, Italy.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

The updated data from the ongoing Phase 1 NAVIGATOR trial support Blueprint Medicines’ plans to submit a New Drug Application (NDA) in the first half of 2019 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of PDGFRA Exon 18 mutant GIST, which primarily includes patients with the D842V mutation, and fourth-line GIST. There are currently no approved or effective therapies in these patient populations. In patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST, avapritinib demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 84 percent and a 12-month duration of response (DoR) of 76 percent. In heavily pre-treated patients with fourth-line or later GIST, avapritinib demonstrated an ORR of 20 percent, tumor reductions in 60 percent of patients and a median DoR of 7.3 months. ORR and DoR per central radiographic review will be the primary endpoints for the NDA submission, consistent with regulatory precedent for accelerated approvals based on single-arm oncology studies. In addition, avapritinib demonstrated an ORR of 26 percent in regorafenib-naïve third- and fourth-line GIST and an ORR of 25 percent in second-line GIST. Patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST were excluded from both of these populations.

"With an increased understanding of molecular drivers of GIST over the last decade, it is encouraging to see an investigational drug, like avapritinib, bring a precision therapy approach to GIST," said Michael Heinrich, M.D., Professor of Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University and an investigator on the NAVIGATOR trial. "Avapritinib has the potential to be a significant therapeutic advance in GIST, a rare cancer with high medical needs across lines of treatment. In particular, the updated data demonstrate the broad clinical impact of avapritinib for patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST and fourth-line GIST, where there are currently no effective therapies. In addition, the data strongly support clinical development of avapritinib in early lines, including second- and third-line treatment."

"These data highlight the potential of avapritinib, a potent and highly selective inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRA mutant kinases, to be a cornerstone precision therapy in GIST," said Andy Boral, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Medical Officer of Blueprint Medicines. "The results validate Blueprint Medicines’ approach to designing precision therapies that specifically target genetic drivers of disease, with the goals of delivering transformative benefit to patients and enabling rapid progress toward registration. Avapritinib’s highly potent anti-tumor activity in PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST, combined with differentiated activity across treatment lines in KIT-driven GIST, reflect its promise as a potentially foundational treatment option across multiple GIST populations. We are committed to advancing a comprehensive and scientifically driven clinical development program with the goal of improving the lives of GIST patients."

Data Highlights from the Ongoing Phase 1 NAVIGATOR Clinical Trial

As of the data cutoff date of October 15, 2018, 231 patients were treated with avapritinib in the dose escalation and expansion portions of the Phase 1 clinical trial at eight dose levels, ranging from 30 mg once daily (QD) to 600 mg QD. This population consisted of 167 patients with KIT-driven GIST, 56 patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST and eight patients with other PDGFRA mutations. Patients in the expansion portion of the clinical trial were treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 300 mg QD.

Safety Data

As of the data cutoff date, avapritinib was well-tolerated, and most AEs reported by investigators were Grade 1 or 2. Across all doses, 20 patients (8.7 percent) discontinued treatment with avapritinib due to treatment-related AEs.

Across all grades, the most common treatment-emergent AEs (regardless of relationship to avapritinib) reported by investigators (≥20 percent) included nausea (61 percent), fatigue (55 percent), anemia (46 percent), periorbital edema (40 percent), diarrhea (39 percent), vomiting (38 percent), decreased appetite (35 percent), peripheral edema (33 percent), increased lacrimation (31 percent), memory impairment (26 percent), constipation (23 percent), face edema (23 percent), hair color changes (21 percent) and dizziness (20 percent).

Investigator-reported Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs (≥2 percent) included anemia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, increased bilirubin, decreased white blood count/neutropenia and diarrhea.

Clinical Activity Data

As of the data cutoff date, the following patients were evaluable for response assessments: 56 patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST, 109 patients with fourth-line or later GIST, 23 patients with third- or fourth-line GIST who did not receive prior regorafenib (which is comparable to the VOYAGER trial population) and do not harbor the PDGFRα D842V mutation, and 20 patients with second-line GIST who do not harbor the PDGFRα D842V mutation. Patients were evaluable if they had at least one centrally reviewed radiographic scan, and data are based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (mRECIST 1.1 criteria) for GIST.

Across multiple lines of therapy, avapritinib demonstrated important clinical activity in patients with PDGFRA- and KIT-driven GIST.

GIST Population

Evaluable
Patients

ORR

Clinical Benefit Rate
at Four Months
(≥Two Scans)

Median DoR

Median PFS

Central Review
(Investigator Review)

PDGFRα D842Va

56

84%f

96%

Not estimable;
76% at 12 months

Not reached

Fourth-line or laterb,c

109

20%g

40%

7.3 months

3.7 months
(5.4 months)

Regorafenib-naïve third-
or fourth-lineb,d

23

26%

70%

10.2 months

8.6 months
(10.2 months)

Second-lined,e

20

25%h

NRi

NRi

NRi

Notes: (a) Treated at all doses; (b) Treated at doses of 300 or 400 mg QD; (c) Included patients with the PDGFRα D842V mutation, whose proportion was consistent with the known mutational prevalence in this GIST population; (d) Did not include patients with the PDGFRα D842V mutation, whose proportion was greater than the known mutational prevalence in this GIST population; (e) Treated at doses up to and including 300 or 400 mg QD; (f) Four PR pending confirmation; (g) One PR pending confirmation; (h) Three PR pending confirmation; (i) NR, not reported, as data are too early to estimate.

Additional Data Support Clinical Development Strategy in Earlier Lines of Therapy

Third- and Fourth-Line GIST

Preliminary data showed robust clinical activity in regorafenib-naïve third- and fourth-line GIST patients lacking the PDGFRα D842V mutation. As of the data cutoff date, the ORR was 26 percent, tumor reductions were demonstrated in 78 percent of patients, and the median PFS was 8.6 months per central radiographic review and 10.2 months per investigator review. In contrast, historical data showed a 5 percent ORR and a median PFS of 4.8 months for regorafenib, the current standard-of-care treatment in third-line GIST.

In regorafenib-naive patients with PDGFRα D842V-driven third- or fourth-line GIST, the ORR was 80 percent (eight out of 10 evaluable patients, with one response pending confirmation). Blueprint Medicines’ ongoing Phase 3 VOYAGER trial of avapritinib versus regorafenib in third- or fourth-line GIST permits enrollment of patients with both KIT- and PDGFRA-driven GIST, including patients with the PDGFRα D842V mutation. Blueprint Medicines anticipates completing enrollment of the VOYAGER trial in the second half of 2019.

Second-Line GIST

Preliminary data showed a 25 percent ORR in second-line GIST, excluding patients with the PDGFRα D842V mutation. In patients with second-line PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST, the ORR was 94 percent (15 out of 16 evaluable patients, with two responses pending confirmation).

In addition, analyses of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from the NAVIGATOR trial across all lines showed increased activity for avapritinib in patients without the secondary KIT V654A or T670I mutations, which are estimated to occur in about 20 to 25 percent of GIST patients following treatment with imatinib (second-line or later). Independently published data for sunitinib, the current standard of care therapy for second-line GIST, have shown activity against these mutations.

Based on the totality of data, Blueprint Medicines believes a precision medicine approach has the potential to optimize patient outcomes in second-line GIST. The company plans to initiate the registration-enabling Phase 3 COMPASS-2L clinical trial in the second half of 2019 using a ctDNA-guided patient selection strategy. The planned trial will select patients with PDGFRA- and KIT-driven second-line GIST who do not have the KIT V654A or T670I mutations, and randomize them to receive avapritinib or sunitinib with an anticipated primary endpoint of PFS.

Conference Call Information

Blueprint Medicines will host a live conference call and webcast on November 15, 2018 at 7:30 a.m. ET to review the updated data for avapritinib in GIST. The conference call may be accessed by dialing (855) 728-4793 (domestic) or (503) 343-6666 (international) and referring to conference ID 3479587. A live webcast of the conference call will be available under "Events and Presentations" in the Investors section of Blueprint Medicines’ website at View Source The archived webcast will be available on Blueprint Medicines’ website approximately two hours after the conference call and will be available for 30 days following the call.

About the Avapritinib Clinical Development Program in GIST

Blueprint Medicines is pursuing a broad clinical development program for avapritinib across all lines of GIST. Avapritinib is currently being evaluated in two ongoing registration-enabling clinical trials for GIST: the Phase 1 NAVIGATOR trial and the Phase 3 VOYAGER trial.

The NAVIGATOR trial is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of avapritinib in patients with advanced GIST. The trial consists of two parts, a dose escalation portion and an expansion portion. The dose escalation portion is complete, and trial objectives include assessing response, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic measures. Response assessments use blinded, central radiology review. The expansion cohorts of the trial are designed to enroll a total of approximately 200 patients at multiple sites in the United States, United Kingdom and European Union.

The VOYAGER trial is a global, open-label, randomized, Phase 3 trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of avapritinib versus regorafenib in patients with third- or fourth-line advanced GIST. The trial is designed to enroll approximately 460 patients randomized 1:1 to receive either avapritinib or regorafenib at multiple sites in the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Australia and Asia.

In the second half of 2019, Blueprint Medicines plans to initiate COMPASS-2L, a global, randomized, Phase 3 precision medicine trial. The trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of avapritinib versus sunitinib in patients with second-line advanced GIST and pre-specified disease genotypes.

Patients and physicians interested in the Phase 3 VOYAGER trial can contact the Blueprint Medicines study director at [email protected] or 1-617-714-6707. For more information about the VOYAGER trial, please visit www.voyagertrial.com. Additional details are available on www.clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03465722).

About GIST

GIST is a sarcoma, or tumor of bone or connective tissue, of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Tumors arise from cells in the wall of the GI tract and occur most often in the stomach or small intestine. Most patients are diagnosed between the ages of 50 to 80, and diagnosis is typically triggered by GI bleeding, incidental findings during surgery or imaging and, in rare cases, tumor rupture or GI obstruction.

Most GIST cases are caused by a spectrum of clinically relevant mutations that force the KIT or PDGFRA protein kinases into an increasingly active state. Because currently available therapies only bind to the inactive protein conformations, certain primary and secondary mutations typically lead to treatment resistance and disease progression.

Treatment options for KIT-driven GIST patients whose disease progresses or develops resistance are currently limited. There are no effective treatment options for patients with PDGFRA-driven GIST, and progression often occurs in as little as three months with available therapies. In advanced GIST, clinical benefits from existing treatments can vary by mutation type. Early testing is critical to help guide therapy that effectively treats the underlying driver of disease and is recommended in expert guidelines.

About Avapritinib

Avapritinib is a potent and selective oral inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRA mutant kinases. It is a type 1 inhibitor designed to target the active kinase conformation; all oncogenic kinases signal via this conformation. Avapritinib has demonstrated broad inhibition of KIT and PDGFRA mutations associated with GIST, and the most potent activity against activation loop mutations, which currently approved therapies do not inhibit. In contrast with existing multi-kinase inhibitors, avapritinib has shown marked selectivity for KIT and PDGFRA over other kinases. In addition, avapritinib is uniquely designed to bind and inhibit the KIT D816V mutation, the primary driver of disease in up to 95 percent of systemic mastocytosis (SM) patients. Preclinical studies have shown avapritinib potently inhibited KIT D816V at sub-nanomolar potencies with minimal off-target activity.

Blueprint Medicines is initially developing avapritinib, an investigational medicine, for the treatment of advanced GIST, advanced SM, and indolent and smoldering SM. The FDA has granted avapritinib two Breakthrough Therapy Designations, one for the treatment of PDGFRα D842V-driven GIST and one for advanced SM.

Blueprint Medicines has an exclusive collaboration and license agreement with CStone Pharmaceuticals for the development and commercialization of avapritinib and certain other drug candidates in Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Blueprint Medicines retains development and commercial rights for avapritinib in the rest of the world.

On November 15, 2018 Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:DCPH), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on addressing key mechanisms of tumor drug resistance, reported completion of enrollment in the INVICTUS pivotal Phase 3 clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of DCC-2618, a broad-spectrum KIT and PDGFRα inhibitor, in fourth-line and fourth-line-plus gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients (Press release, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, NOV 15, 2018, View Source [SID1234531370]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We are very pleased to have completed enrollment in the INVICTUS pivotal Phase 3 study, initiated in January 2018. We expect to report top-line data from this randomized, double-blind study in mid-2019 and, if successful, we believe the results would support a New Drug Application (NDA) for full approval in fourth-line and fourth-line-plus GIST patients," said Michael D. Taylor, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Deciphera. "Currently there are no treatments approved for fourth-line and fourth-line-plus GIST and we are grateful to those patients who participated in our study and to the GIST community for its support. In addition, we look forward to initiating later this year a second pivotal Phase 3 study, the INTRIGUE study, in second-line GIST patients who have progressed or are intolerant to front-line therapy with imatinib, including those with any KIT or PDGFRα mutation."

On October 19, 2018, Deciphera presented updated data from its ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial of DCC-2618 in patients with GIST at the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2018 Congress in Munich, Germany.
View Source

About the INVICTUS Phase 3 Study
The INVICTUS Phase 3 clinical study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DCC-2618 compared to placebo in patients with advanced GIST whose previous therapies have included imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib. This study was designed to provide the definitive evidence of clinical benefit in fourth-line and fourth-line-plus GIST patients that would be required to secure a full regulatory approval. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either 150 mg of DCC-2618 or placebo once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint is median progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by independent radiologic review using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary endpoints as determined by independent radiologic review using modified RECIST include Objective Response Rate (ORR), Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), and Overall Survival (OS). See www.clinicaltrials.gov for further information (NCT03353753).

About DCC-2618
DCC-2618 is an investigational KIT and PDGFRα kinase switch control inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of KIT and/or PDGFRα-driven cancers, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or GIST, systemic mastocytosis, or SM, and other cancers. DCC-2618 was specifically designed to improve the treatment of GIST patients by inhibiting a broad spectrum of mutations in KIT and PDGFRα. DCC-2618 is a KIT and PDGFRα inhibitor that blocks initiating and secondary KIT mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, and 18, involved in GIST as well as the primary D816V exon 17 mutation involved in SM. DCC-2618 also inhibits primary PDGFRα mutations in exons 12, 14 and 18, including the exon 18 D842V mutation, involved in a subset of GIST.

On November 15, 2018 Moleculin Biotech, Inc., (Nasdaq: MBRX) ("Moleculin" or the "Company"), a clinical stage pharmaceutical company focused on the development of oncology drug candidates, all of which are based on license agreements with The University of Texas System on behalf of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, reported it has filed a request with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a Pre-Investigational New Drug (IND) Meeting to seek FDA’s guidance and concurrence that the WP1732 development plan will meet requirements for an Initial IND filing and initiation of a proposed Phase 1 clinical trial (Press release, Moleculin, NOV 15, 2018, View Source [SID1234531354]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Independent animal model testing has now confirmed high uptake and retention of WP1732 in the pancreas," commented Walter Klemp, Moleculin’s Chairman and CEO. "Taken together with the previous observations of consistent activity against pancreatic cancer in in vitro and in vivo tumor models, this could make WP1732 ideally suited as a new therapy for treating pancreatic cancer. Our request for a Pre-IND Meeting with the FDA represents another important milestone in our effort to begin clinical trials with this promising new drug candidate."

On November 15, 2018 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) reported that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency adopted a positive opinion recommending approval of the Opdivo (nivolumab) plus low-dose Yervoy (ipilimumab) combination to include first-line treatment for patients with intermediate- and poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (Press release, Bristol-Myers Squibb, NOV 15, 2018, View Source [SID1234531371]). This recommendation will now be reviewed by the European Commission (EC), which has the authority to approve medicines for the European Union (EU).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"There remains a high unmet medical need for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma," said Arvin Yang, M.D., Ph.D., development lead, melanoma and genitourinary cancers, Bristol-Myers Squibb. "We are encouraged by today’s positive opinion from the CHMP and look forward to potentially bringing the first Immuno-Oncology combination therapy to appropriate RCC patients across the EU."

The CHMP recommendation is based on positive data from the Phase 3 CheckMate -214 clinical trial, which was stopped early following a planned interim analysis that showed the combination of Opdivo 3 mg/kg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg demonstrated a significant increase in overall survival (OS) with a 37% decreased risk of death in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, regardless of PD-L1 expression level, compared to a current standard of care, sunitinib (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.63; 99.8% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.44 to 0.89; p<0.0001). Median OS in patients treated with Opdivo plus low-dose Yervoy was not yet reached (95% CI: 28.2 to not estimable [NE]), compared to 25.9 months for patients treated with sunitinib. Opdivo plus low-dose Yervoy also delivered durable responses with a higher objective response rate of 41.6% (95% CI: 36.9 to 46.5; p<0.0001; n=177/425) versus 26.5% for sunitinib (95% CI: 22.4 to 31.0; n=112/422). Median duration of response (durability) for Opdivo plus low-dose Yervoy was not yet reached (95% CI: 21.8 to NE) among responded patients, compared to 18.2 months for sunitinib (95% CI: 14.8 to NE). The overall safety profile was consistent with prior studies of Opdivo in combination with low-dose Yervoy.

The results of the CheckMate -214 study were first presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2017 Congress and were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in March 2018.

About CheckMate -214

CheckMate -214 is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label study evaluating the combination of Opdivo 3 mg/kg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the intermediate- and poor-risk study population, 425 patients received Opdivo 3 mg/kg plus Yervoy 1 mg/kg every three weeks for four doses, followed by Opdivo 3 mg/kg every two weeks, and 422 patients received sunitinib 50 mg once daily for four weeks, followed by two weeks off every cycle. The recommended dosing for the Opdivo plus low-dose Yervoy combination is Opdivo 3 mg/kg followed by Yervoy 1 mg/kg each infused intravenously over 30 minutes on the same day every three weeks for four doses. After completing four doses of the combination, Opdivo should be administered intravenously 240 mg every two weeks over 30 minutes or 480 mg every four weeks over 60 minutes until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The co-primary efficacy outcome measures of the trial were overall survival, objective response rate (Complete Response + Partial Response) and progression-free survival as determined by an independent radiographic review committee (IRRC) in intermediate- and poor-risk patients. Patients were included regardless of their PD-L1 status.

About Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, accounting for more than 140,000 deaths worldwide each year. Clear-cell RCC is the most prevalent type of RCC and constitutes 80% to 90% of all patients. RCC is approximately twice as common in men as in women, with the highest rates of the disease in North America and Europe. Globally, the five-year survival rate for those diagnosed with metastatic, or advanced, kidney cancer is 12.1%.

Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advancing Oncology Research

We are leading the scientific understanding of I-O through our extensive portfolio of investigational compounds and approved agents. Our differentiated clinical development program is studying broad patient populations across more than 50 types of cancers with 24 clinical-stage molecules designed to target different immune system pathways. Our deep expertise and innovative clinical trial designs position us to advance the I-O/I-O, I-O/chemotherapy, I-O/targeted therapies and I-O radiation therapies across multiple tumors and potentially deliver the next wave of therapies with a sense of urgency. We also continue to pioneer research that will help facilitate a deeper understanding of the role of immune biomarkers and how a patient’s tumor biology can be used as a guide for treatment decisions throughout their journey.

We understand making the promise of I-O a reality for the many patients who may benefit from these therapies requires not only innovation on our part but also close collaboration with leading experts in the field. Our partnerships with academia, government, advocacy and biotech companies support our collective goal of providing new treatment options to advance the standards of clinical practice.

About Opdivo

Opdivo is a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor that is designed to uniquely harness the body’s own immune system to help restore anti-tumor immune response. By harnessing the body’s own immune system to fight cancer, Opdivo has become an important treatment option across multiple cancers.

Opdivo’s leading global development program is based on Bristol-Myers Squibb’s scientific expertise in the field of Immuno-Oncology, and includes a broad range of clinical trials across all phases, including Phase 3, in a variety of tumor types. To date, the Opdivo clinical development program has enrolled more than 25,000 patients. The Opdivo trials have contributed to gaining a deeper understanding of the potential role of biomarkers in patient care, particularly regarding how patients may benefit from Opdivo across the continuum of PD-L1 expression.

In July 2014, Opdivo was the first PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive regulatory approval anywhere in the world. Opdivo is currently approved in more than 65 countries, including the United States, the European Union, Japan and China. In October 2015, the Company’s Opdivo and Yervoy combination regimen was the first Immuno-Oncology combination to receive regulatory approval for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and is currently approved in more than 50 countries, including the United States and the European Union.

U.S. FDA-APPROVED INDICATIONS FOR OPDIVO

OPDIVO (nivolumab) as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other line of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of patients with intermediate or poor risk, previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab), in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab), is indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

OPDIVO (nivolumab) is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNING: IMMUNE-MEDIATED ADVERSE REACTIONS

YERVOY can result in severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions. These immune-mediated reactions may involve any organ system; however, the most common severe immune-mediated adverse reactions are enterocolitis, hepatitis, dermatitis (including toxic epidermal necrolysis), neuropathy, and endocrinopathy. The majority of these immune-mediated reactions initially manifested during treatment; however, a minority occurred weeks to months after discontinuation of YERVOY.

Assess patients for signs and symptoms of enterocolitis, dermatitis, neuropathy, and endocrinopathy, and evaluate clinical chemistries including liver function tests (LFTs), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level, and thyroid function tests, at baseline and before each dose.

Permanently discontinue YERVOY and initiate systemic high-dose corticosteroid therapy for severe immune-mediated reactions.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. Fatal cases have been reported. Monitor patients for signs with radiographic imaging and for symptoms of pneumonitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or more severe pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 and withhold until resolution for Grade 2. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, fatal cases of immune-mediated pneumonitis have occurred. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% (61/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 6% (25/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.4% (24/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 1.7% (2/119) of patients.

In Checkmate 205 and 039, pneumonitis, including interstitial lung disease, occurred in 6.0% (16/266) of patients receiving OPDIVO. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 4.9% (13/266) of patients receiving OPDIVO: Grade 3 (n=1) and Grade 2 (n=12).

Immune-Mediated Colitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated colitis. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of colitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 (of more than 5 days duration), 3, or 4 colitis. Withhold OPDIVO monotherapy for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 or recurrent colitis upon re-initiation of OPDIVO. When administered with YERVOY, withhold OPDIVO and YERVOY for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 or recurrent colitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 2.9% (58/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 26% (107/407) of patients including three fatal cases. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 10% (52/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated colitis occurred in 7% (8/119) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal (diarrhea of ≥7 stools above baseline, fever, ileus, peritoneal signs; Grade 3-5) immune-mediated enterocolitis occurred in 34 (7%) patients. Across all YERVOY-treated patients in that study (n=511), 5 (1%) developed intestinal perforation, 4 (0.8%) died as a result of complications, and 26 (5%) were hospitalized for severe enterocolitis.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. Monitor patients for abnormal liver tests prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater transaminase elevations. For patients without HCC, withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for Grade 3 or 4. For patients with HCC, withhold OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids if AST/ALT is within normal limits at baseline and increases to >3 and up to 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), if AST/ALT is >1 and up to 3 times ULN at baseline and increases to >5 and up to 10 times the ULN, and if AST/ALT is >3 and up to 5 times ULN at baseline and increases to >8 and up to 10 times the ULN. Permanently discontinue OPDIVO and administer corticosteroids if AST or ALT increases to >10 times the ULN or total bilirubin increases >3 times the ULN. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 1.8% (35/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 13% (51/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 7% (38/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 8% (10/119) of patients.

In Checkmate 040, immune-mediated hepatitis requiring systemic corticosteroids occurred in 5% (8/154) of patients receiving OPDIVO.

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal hepatotoxicity (AST or ALT elevations >5x the ULN or total bilirubin elevations >3x the ULN; Grade 3-5) occurred in 8 (2%) patients, with fatal hepatic failure in 0.2% and hospitalization in 0.4%.

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, 1 case of fatal Guillain-Barré syndrome and 1 case of severe (Grade 3) peripheral motor neuropathy were reported.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated hypophysitis, immune-mediated adrenal insufficiency, autoimmune thyroid disorders, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of hypophysitis, signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency, thyroid function prior to and periodically during treatment, and hyperglycemia. Administer hormone replacement as clinically indicated and corticosteroids for Grade 2 or greater hypophysitis. Withhold for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hypophysitis. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Withhold for Grade 2 and permanently discontinue for Grade 3 or 4 adrenal insufficiency. Administer hormone-replacement therapy for hypothyroidism. Initiate medical management for control of hyperthyroidism. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 hyperglycemia.

In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (12/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 9% (36/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypophysitis occurred in 4.6% (25/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated hypophysitis occurred in 3.4% (4/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 1% (20/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5% (21/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 7% (41/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, adrenal insufficiency occurred in 5.9% (7/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 2.7% (54/1994) of patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (89/407) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 8% (34/407) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 22% (119/547) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (66/547) of patients receiving this dose of OPDIVO with YERVOY. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, hypothyroidism or thyroiditis resulting in hypothyroidism occurred in 15% (18/119) of patients. Hyperthyroidism occurred in 12% (14/119) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, diabetes occurred in 0.9% (17/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, diabetes occurred in 1.5% (6/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, diabetes occurred in 2.7% (15/547) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe to life-threatening immune-mediated endocrinopathies (requiring hospitalization, urgent medical intervention, or interfering with activities of daily living; Grade 3-4) occurred in 9 (1.8%) patients. All 9 patients had hypopituitarism, and some had additional concomitant endocrinopathies such as adrenal insufficiency, hypogonadism, and hypothyroidism. Six of the 9 patients were hospitalized for severe endocrinopathies.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis and Renal Dysfunction

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated nephritis. Monitor patients for elevated serum creatinine prior to and periodically during treatment. Administer corticosteroids for Grades 2-4 increased serum creatinine. Withhold OPDIVO for Grade 2 or 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 increased serum creatinine. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.2% (23/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 2.2% (9/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 4.6% (25/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.7% (2/119) of patients.

Immune-Mediated Skin Adverse Reactions and Dermatitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated rash, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), some cases with fatal outcome. Administer corticosteroids for Grade 3 or 4 rash. Withhold for Grade 3 and permanently discontinue for Grade 4 rash. For symptoms or signs of SJS or TEN, withhold OPDIVO and refer the patient for specialized care for assessment and treatment; if confirmed, permanently discontinue. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, immune-mediated rash occurred in 9% (171/1994) of patients. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 22.6% (92/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 16.6% (91/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, immune-mediated rash occurred in 14% (17/119) of patients.

In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, severe, life-threatening, or fatal immune-mediated dermatitis (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or rash complicated by full thickness dermal ulceration, or necrotic, bullous, or hemorrhagic manifestations; Grade 3-5) occurred in 13 (2.5%) patients. 1 (0.2%) patient died as a result of toxic epidermal necrolysis. 1 additional patient required hospitalization for severe dermatitis.

Immune-Mediated Encephalitis

OPDIVO can cause immune-mediated encephalitis. Evaluation of patients with neurologic symptoms may include, but not be limited to, consultation with a neurologist, brain MRI, and lumbar puncture. Withhold OPDIVO in patients with new-onset moderate to severe neurologic signs or symptoms and evaluate to rule out other causes. If other etiologies are ruled out, administer corticosteroids and permanently discontinue OPDIVO for immune-mediated encephalitis. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy, encephalitis occurred in 0.2% (3/1994) of patients. Fatal limbic encephalitis occurred in one patient after 7.2 months of exposure despite discontinuation of OPDIVO and administration of corticosteroids. Encephalitis occurred in one patient receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg (0.2%) after 1.7 months of exposure. Encephalitis occurred in one RCC patient receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg (0.2%) after approximately 4 months of exposure. Encephalitis occurred in one MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patient (0.8%) receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg after 15 days of exposure.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

Based on the severity of the adverse reaction, permanently discontinue or withhold OPDIVO, administer high-dose corticosteroids, and, if appropriate, initiate hormone-replacement therapy. Across clinical trials of OPDIVO monotherapy or in combination with YERVOY, the following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions, some with fatal outcome, occurred in <1.0% of patients receiving OPDIVO: myocarditis, rhabdomyolysis, myositis, uveitis, iritis, pancreatitis, facial and abducens nerve paresis, demyelination, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypopituitarism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastritis, duodenitis, sarcoidosis, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), motor dysfunction, vasculitis, aplastic anemia, pericarditis, and myasthenic syndrome.

If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like syndrome, which has been observed in patients receiving OPDIVO and may require treatment with systemic steroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss.

Infusion Reactions

OPDIVO can cause severe infusion reactions, which have been reported in <1.0% of patients in clinical trials. Discontinue OPDIVO in patients with Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion in patients with Grade 1 or 2. In patients receiving OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.4% (127/1994) of patients. In a separate study in which patients received OPDIVO monotherapy as a 60-minute infusion or a 30-minute infusion, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.2% (8/368) and 2.7% (10/369) of patients, respectively. Additionally, 0.5% (2/368) and 1.4% (5/369) of patients, respectively, experienced adverse reactions within 48 hours of infusion that led to dose delay, permanent discontinuation or withholding of OPDIVO. In patients receiving OPDIVO 1 mg/kg with YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, infusion-related reactions occurred in 2.5% (10/407) of patients. In RCC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 5.1% (28/547) of patients. In MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO 3 mg/kg with YERVOY 1 mg/kg, infusion-related reactions occurred in 4.2% (5/119) of patients.

Complications of Allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO

Complications, including fatal events, occurred in patients who received allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO. Outcomes were evaluated in 17 patients from Checkmate 205 and 039, who underwent allogeneic HSCT after discontinuing OPDIVO (15 with reduced-intensity conditioning, 2 with myeloablative conditioning). Thirty-five percent (6/17) of patients died from complications of allogeneic HSCT after OPDIVO. Five deaths occurred in the setting of severe or refractory GVHD. Grade 3 or higher acute GVHD was reported in 29% (5/17) of patients. Hyperacute GVHD was reported in 20% (n=2) of patients. A steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, without an identified infectious cause, was reported in 35% (n=6) of patients. Two cases of encephalitis were reported: Grade 3 (n=1) lymphocytic encephalitis without an identified infectious cause, and Grade 3 (n=1) suspected viral encephalitis. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) occurred in one patient, who received reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic HSCT and died of GVHD and multi-organ failure. Other cases of hepatic VOD after reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic HSCT have also been reported in patients with lymphoma who received a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody before transplantation. Cases of fatal hyperacute GVHD have also been reported. These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between PD-1 blockade and allogeneic HSCT.

Follow patients closely for early evidence of transplant-related complications such as hyperacute GVHD, severe (Grade 3 to 4) acute GVHD, steroid-requiring febrile syndrome, hepatic VOD, and other immune-mediated adverse reactions, and intervene promptly.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on their mechanisms of action, OPDIVO and YERVOY can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with an OPDIVO- or YERVOY- containing regimen and for at least 5 months after the last dose of OPDIVO.

Lactation

It is not known whether OPDIVO or YERVOY is present in human milk. Because many drugs, including antibodies, are excreted in human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from an OPDIVO-containing regimen, advise women to discontinue breastfeeding during treatment. Advise women to discontinue breastfeeding during treatment with YERVOY and for 3 months following the final dose.

Serious Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 037, serious adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=268). Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 42% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse drug reactions reported in 2% to <5% of patients receiving OPDIVO were abdominal pain, hyponatremia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased lipase. In Checkmate 066, serious adverse reactions occurred in 36% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=206). Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 41% of patients receiving OPDIVO. The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (3.9%) and diarrhea (3.4%). In Checkmate 067, serious adverse reactions (73% and 37%), adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation (43% and 14%) or to dosing delays (55% and 28%), and Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions (72% and 44%) all occurred more frequently in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) relative to the OPDIVO arm (n=313). The most frequent (≥10%) serious adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm and the OPDIVO arm, respectively, were diarrhea (13% and 2.6%), colitis (10% and 1.6%), and pyrexia (10% and 0.6%). In Checkmate 017 and 057, serious adverse reactions occurred in 46% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=418). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, dyspnea, pyrexia, pleural effusion, pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. In Checkmate 032, serious adverse reactions occurred in 45% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=245). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in at least 2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, dyspnea, pneumonitis, pleural effusion, and dehydration. In Checkmate 025, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=406). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were acute kidney injury, pleural effusion, pneumonia, diarrhea, and hypercalcemia. In Checkmate 214, serious adverse reactions occurred in 59% of patients receiving OPDIVO plus YERVOY and in 43% of patients receiving sunitinib. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were diarrhea, pyrexia, pneumonia, pneumonitis, hypophysitis, acute kidney injury, dyspnea, adrenal insufficiency, and colitis; in patients treated with sunitinib, they were pneumonia, pleural effusion, and dyspnea. In Checkmate 205 and 039, adverse reactions leading to discontinuation occurred in 7% and dose delays due to adverse reactions occurred in 34% of patients (n=266). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 26% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥1% of patients were pneumonia, infusion-related reaction, pyrexia, colitis or diarrhea, pleural effusion, pneumonitis, and rash. Eleven patients died from causes other than disease progression: 3 from adverse reactions within 30 days of the last OPDIVO dose, 2 from infection 8 to 9 months after completing OPDIVO, and 6 from complications of allogeneic HSCT. In Checkmate 141, serious adverse reactions occurred in 49% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=236). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were pneumonia, dyspnea, respiratory failure, respiratory tract infection, and sepsis. In Checkmate 275, serious adverse reactions occurred in 54% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=270). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO were urinary tract infection, sepsis, diarrhea, small intestine obstruction, and general physical health deterioration. In Checkmate 142 in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, serious adverse reactions occurred in 47% of patients. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were colitis/diarrhea, hepatic events, abdominal pain, acute kidney injury, pyrexia, and dehydration. In Checkmate 040, serious adverse reactions occurred in 49% of patients (n=154). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were pyrexia, ascites, back pain, general physical health deterioration, abdominal pain, and pneumonia. In Checkmate 238, Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25% of OPDIVO-treated patients (n=452). The most frequent Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of OPDIVO-treated patients were diarrhea and increased lipase and amylase. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 18% of OPDIVO-treated patients.

Common Adverse Reactions

In Checkmate 037, the most common adverse reaction (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO (n=268) was rash (21%). In Checkmate 066, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported with OPDIVO (n=206) vs dacarbazine (n=205) were fatigue (49% vs 39%), musculoskeletal pain (32% vs 25%), rash (28% vs 12%), and pruritus (23% vs 12%). In Checkmate 067, the most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO plus YERVOY arm (n=313) were fatigue (59%), rash (53%), diarrhea (52%), nausea (40%), pyrexia (37%), vomiting (28%), and dyspnea (20%). The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions in the OPDIVO (n=313) arm were fatigue (53%), rash (40%), diarrhea (31%), and nausea (28%). In Checkmate 017 and 057, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=418) were fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, cough, dyspnea, and decreased appetite. In Checkmate 032, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=245) were fatigue (45%), decreased appetite (27%), musculoskeletal pain (25%), dyspnea (22%), nausea (22%), diarrhea (21%), constipation (20%), and cough (20%). In Checkmate 025, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=406) vs everolimus (n=397) were fatigue (56% vs 57%), cough (34% vs 38%), nausea (28% vs 29%), rash (28% vs 36%), dyspnea (27% vs 31%), diarrhea (25% vs 32%), constipation (23% vs 18%), decreased appetite (23% vs 30%), back pain (21% vs 16%), and arthralgia (20% vs 14%). In Checkmate 214, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients treated with OPDIVO plus YERVOY (n=547) vs sunitinib (n=535) were fatigue (58% vs 69%), rash (39% vs 25%), diarrhea (38% vs 58%), musculoskeletal pain (37% vs 40%), pruritus (33% vs 11%), nausea (30% vs 43%), cough (28% vs 25%), pyrexia (25% vs 17%), arthralgia (23% vs 16%), decreased appetite (21% vs 29%), dyspnea (20% vs 21%), and vomiting (20% vs 28%). In Checkmate 205 and 039, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=266) were upper respiratory tract infection (44%), fatigue (39%), cough (36%), diarrhea (33%), pyrexia (29%), musculoskeletal pain (26%), rash (24%), nausea (20%), and pruritus (20%). In Checkmate 141, the most common adverse reactions (≥10%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=236) were cough and dyspnea at a higher incidence than investigator’s choice. In Checkmate 275, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=270) were fatigue (46%), musculoskeletal pain (30%), nausea (22%), and decreased appetite (22%). In Checkmate 142 in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO as a single agent, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were fatigue (54%), diarrhea (43%), abdominal pain (34%), nausea (34%), vomiting (28%), musculoskeletal pain (28%), cough (26%), pyrexia (24%), rash (23%), constipation (20%), and upper respiratory tract infection (20%). In Checkmate 142 in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving OPDIVO with YERVOY, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were fatigue (49%), diarrhea (45%), pyrexia (36%), musculoskeletal pain (36%), abdominal pain (30%), pruritus (28%), nausea (26%), rash (25%), decreased appetite (20%), and vomiting (20%). In Checkmate 040, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=154) were fatigue (38%), musculoskeletal pain (36%), abdominal pain (34%), pruritus (27%), diarrhea (27%), rash (26%), cough (23%), and decreased appetite (22%). In Checkmate 238, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in OPDIVO-treated patients (n=452) vs ipilimumab-treated patients (n=453) were fatigue (57% vs 55%), diarrhea (37% vs 55%), rash (35% vs 47%), musculoskeletal pain (32% vs 27%), pruritus (28% vs 37%), headache (23% vs 31%), nausea (23% vs 28%), upper respiratory infection (22% vs 15%), and abdominal pain (21% vs 23%). The most common immune-mediated adverse reactions were rash (16%), diarrhea/colitis (6%), and hepatitis (3%). In a separate Phase 3 study of YERVOY 3 mg/kg, the most common adverse reactions (≥5%) in patients who received YERVOY at 3 mg/kg were fatigue (41%), diarrhea (32%), pruritus (31%), rash (29%), and colitis (8%).

Checkmate Trials and Patient Populations

Checkmate 067–advanced melanoma alone or in combination with YERVOY (ipilimumab); Checkmate 214–intermediate or poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma in combination with YERVOY; Checkmate 142–MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer; Checkmate 205/039–classical Hodgkin lymphoma; Checkmate 040–hepatocellular carcinoma; Checkmate 037/066–advanced melanoma; Checkmate 017–squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Checkmate 057–non-squamous NSCLC; Checkmate 025–previously treated renal cell carcinoma; Checkmate 141–squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; Checkmate 275–urothelial carcinoma; Checkmate 238–adjuvant treatment of melanoma.

On November 15, 2018 SELLAS Life Sciences Group, Inc. (Nasdaq:SLS) ("SELLAS" or the "Company"), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of novel cancer immunotherapies for a broad range of cancer indications, reported financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 (Press release, Sellas Life Sciences, NOV 15, 2018, View Source [SID1234531355]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Throughout the third quarter and in recent weeks, we made significant progress advancing our clinical development programs while also improving the Company’s financial standing. We strengthened our cash position with an equity offering in July and the recent settlement with JGB removed all outstanding debt while bringing an additional $6.6 million into the Company. Our Phase 1/2 galinpepimut-S (GPS) basket study in collaboration with Merck is progressing well and we are also further preparing for our registrational Phase 3 GPS trial in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) which we look forward to commencing in early 2019," said Angelos Stergiou, MD, ScD h.c., President and Chief Executive Officer of SELLAS. "We also continue to be excited about our nelipepimut-S (NPS, Neuvax) program in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients as we review additional correlative data from the positive Phase 2b study. We have submitted a robust regulatory briefing to the FDA for review and hope to agree on the most optimal development program for NPS in TNBC in December while we continue our discussions with potential partners."

Third Quarter 2018 and Recent Business Highlights

Clinical Pipeline
During the third quarter, several clinical sites were activated in the planned Phase 1/2 open label five-arm basket type trial of galinpepimut-S (GPS) administered in combination with Merck & Co.’s PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab (Keytruda), with patients currently being screened.
In October and November 2018, the Company reported on final data for nelipepimut-S (NPS, Neuvax). In October 2018, the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board concluded that the final positive data (median follow-up of more than 26 months) from the Phase 2b study of trastuzumab (Herceptin) +/- NPS in HER2 1+/2+ breast cancer patients confirmed the previously disclosed interim positive data (median follow-up of less than 19 months) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. This positive final data was presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (Free ESMO Whitepaper) 2018 Annual Meeting. The final Phase 2b study data revealed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant difference in favor of the active arm, NPS plus trastuzumab (vs. trastuzumab alone), in TNBC patients at 26 months with a p-value of 0.013 and a 75.2% relative risk reduction of relapse or death and showed no imbalances in safety between the active arm and the control arm. In November 2018, SELLAS announced additional data from a preplanned secondary efficacy analysis of the Phase 2b study data showing consistent clinical effect across HLA allele subgroups in TNBC patients, including the HLA-A24+ subgroup which is highly prevalent in the Asian population. This additional efficacy analysis showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit in the HLA-A24+ subgroup with a p-value of 0.003 and a 90.6% relative risk reduction of relapse or death in favor of the active arm, NPS plus trastuzumab. The Company is continuing to advance potential partnering discussions for NeuVax.

Regulatory
A meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the most optimal regulatory pathway for further development of NPS in TNBC patients is scheduled to take place in December 2018.
In September 2018, SELLAS announced that the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products of the European Medicines Agency approved orphan medicinal product designation for GPS for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM).
In July 2018, SELLAS announced that the FDA granted Fast Track designation to GPS for the treatment of MM.

Corporate
In October 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order granting in full the Company’s motion to dismiss the complaint brought by JGB (Cayman) Newton, Ltd. (JGB) in connection with a senior secured debenture entered into by SELLAS’ predecessor while allowing SELLAS’ substantive counterclaims against JGB to remain. In November 2018, the Company announced that it had reached a settlement with JGB regarding the counterclaims. The Company received approximately $6.6 million in the settlement and the debenture and all related agreements, liens and security interests were terminated.
In July 2018, SELLAS completed an underwritten public offering of common stock and pre-funded warrants, together with accompanying common stock warrants, for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $21.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses.
As of September 30, 2018, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents were $10.0 million compared to $2.3 million as of December 31, 2017.
Third Quarter 2018 Financial Results

For accounting purposes, SELLAS Life Sciences Group Ltd., a private Bermuda exempted company (SELLAS Ltd.), is considered to have acquired the Company (which was formerly known as Galena Biopharma, Inc. (Galena) in the business combination between SELLAS Ltd. and Galena (the Merger); therefore, upon the Merger, the financial statements of Galena became those of SELLAS Ltd. and the results reported are those of SELLAS Ltd. reflecting the acquisition of Galena as of December 29, 2017.

Cash Position: As of September 30, 2018, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $10.0 million which does not include a $6.6 million payment received by the Company that was related to the settlement of litigation with JGB in November 2018. Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2017 totaled $2.3 million.

Net cash used in operating activities was $25.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, which includes $4.3 million used to reduce payables related to the Merger. During the third quarter SELLAS received a total of $21.6 million in net proceeds, after deducting fees and expenses, from an underwritten public offering of common stock and pre-funded warrants, together with accompanying common stock warrants that was completed in July.

R&D Expenses: Research and development expenses were $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2018, as compared to $1.1 million for the third quarter of 2017. The increase was primarily due to the initiation of the Phase 1/2 clinical trial for GPS in combination with Keytruda and ongoing costs incurred during the third quarter related to the Phase 2b trial for NPS in combination with trastuzumab in breast cancer, as well as increased licensing fees resulting from our expanded clinical portfolio as a result of the Merger. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in stock-based compensation during the third quarter of 2018. Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $5.1 million and were $5.1 million for the same period in 2017.

G&A Expense: General and administrative expenses were $1.3 million for the third quarter of 2018, as compared to $3.2 million for the third quarter of 2017. The decrease in the current period was primarily due to a reduction in stock-based compensation and the accounting treatment for costs related to litigation and other legal matters associated with the settlement of the JGB litigation and resulting reimbursement of legal fees. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in personnel related expenses, insurance and other expenses. General and administrative expenses for the first nine months of 2018 were $10.1 million, as compared to $9.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase was primarily related to costs associated with outside services, accounting and audit expenses, insurance and public company costs, partially offset by a reduction in stock-based compensation and a decrease in financing and advisory fees associated with the Merger.

Net Loss: Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $9.4 million for the third quarter of 2018, or a basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders of $0.53, as compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $4.5 million for the third quarter of 2017, or a basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders of $2.27. The increase in net loss was driven primarily by non-cash charges related to equity issuances during 2018.

Conference Call and Webcast Information

SELLAS will host a conference call and live audio webcast today at 8:00 a.m. ET to discuss these financial results and provide a business update. To participate in the conference call, please dial (866) 416-7995 (domestic) or (409) 217-8225 (international) and refer to conference ID 7038536. A live webcast of the call can be accessed under "Events & Presentations" in the Investors section of the Company’s website at www.sellaslifesciences.com. An archived webcast recording will be available on the SELLAS website beginning approximately two hours after the call.