ZIOPHARM Announces Clinical Data Highlighting Favorable Interim Survival Results with Gene Therapy Candidate Ad-RTS-hIL-12 in Brain Cancer

On May 18, 2016 ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. (Nasdaq:ZIOP) REPORTED that interim results from the Company’s ongoing Phase 1, multi-center dose-escalation study of the gene therapy candidate Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + orally-administered veledimex in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting held June 3-7, 2016, at McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois (Press release, Ziopharm, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512565]). Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex is a novel viral gene therapy candidate for the controlled expression of interleukin 12 (IL-12), a pro-inflammatory cytokine critical for stimulating anti-cancer immune responses.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary brain tumor affecting approximately 74,000 people worldwide each year.i, ii Recurrent glioblastoma is an aggressive cancer with one of the lowest 3-year survival rates, at 3%, among all cancers.iii For patients who have experienced multiple recurrences the prognosis is particularly poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 6-7 months, while OS in patients that have failed temozolomide and bevacizumab, or equivalent salvage chemotherapy, is approximately 3-5 months.iv, v

The primary objective of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of a single intratumoral Ad-RTS-hIL-12 injection activated upon dosing with oral veledimex. Secondary objectives are to determine the Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex maximum tolerated dose, the immune responses elicited by Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex, and assessment of biologic response. Eleven patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (one with grade III and ten with grade IV) have been treated to date with Ad-RTS-hIL-12 through direct injection into their brain tumors, including seven patients in the first dose cohort (veledimex dosed at 20 mg) and four in the ongoing second dose cohort (veledimex dosed at 40 mg). Veledimex was taken orally to activate the production of IL-12 from the tumor site and stimulate an immune response.

Patients enrolled in this multi-center study have all failed standard therapy, with nine of eleven patients failing additional salvage treatments, for a mean of 2.7 prior lines of therapy in cohort one and 2.0 prior lines in cohort two. No enrollment restrictions were placed on tumor size or location within the supratentorial space. Overall median follow-up for patients enrolled in the trial is 6.2 months with 10 of 11 alive. In the fully-enrolled cohort one, 6 of 7 (86%) patients remain alive with a median follow up of 6.8 months. Enrollment in cohort two is ongoing. Even at its lowest dose, the presence of IL-12 in the bloodstream could be detected, demonstrating that veledimex is bioavailable and crosses the blood brain barrier at sufficient levels to turn on the RheoSwitch (RTS) and generate IL-12, which could be measured in the blood stream. Furthermore, for those patients that experienced adverse events associated with the treatment, discontinuing veledimex reversed these adverse events.

"Early results observed in the limited number of patients who have been treated with Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex are very encouraging for a Phase 1 study," said Ennio Antonio Chiocca, M.D., Ph.D., Harvey W. Cushing Professor of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Surgical Director, Center for Neuro-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Chairman, Neurosurgery, Brigham And Women’s Hospital and Co-Director, Institute for the Neurosciences, Brigham And Women’s Hospital. "Virus-based gene therapy used to stimulate an immunological response in the brain is at the frontier of innovation in treatment, with Ad-RTS-hIL-12 offering perhaps the most controllable approach within this field. In this study, we see encouraging signs of immune activation following the administration of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex."

Overall Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex was well tolerated. All serious adverse events and Grade 3 related toxicities were rapidly reversible upon discontinuation of veledimex. The most common related adverse events included headache, nausea/vomiting, fever, white blood cell/leukocyte count decrease, platelet count decrease and liver function test increase. Four subjects had related serious adverse events.

"Because the brain is a segregated and fragile environment, the ability to turn an immune response on and off is critical to balancing efficacy and tolerability," said Francois Lebel, M.D., Executive Vice President, Research and Development, Chief Medical Officer at ZIOPHARM. "As we continue to follow patients with extremely guarded prognoses in this multi-center trial, we hope that these promising early trends in survival are maintained. Our goal, once we reach an optimal dose, will be to promptly initiate registration trial discussions with regulators."

Dr. Laurence Cooper, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of ZIOPHARM, added: "Basing our approach on the genetic engineering of adenovirus offers a simpler strategy than replicating viral-therapy options, one that can be rapidly controlled via a drug activating a gene switch, and one that does not rely on intratumoral catheterization. We look forward to testing Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex not just on its own, but in combination with other immuno-oncology approaches, including checkpoint inhibitors and natural killer cells, in clinical trials that we plan to start this year and next. Our data suggest that patients can take a drug by mouth to activate the immune response in their tumors with exciting results."

Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex has been granted Orphan Drug Designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with malignant glioma.

ASCO Presentation Details

Title: Effect of controlled intratumoral viral delivery of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + oral veledimex in subjects with recurrent or progressive glioma
Poster Session: Central Nervous System Tumors
Date and Time: Saturday, June 4, 2016 1:00 PM — 4:30 PM CT
Abstract Number: 2052
Poster: #239
Location: Hall A

In addition to the GBM study, a study design for the Company’s Phase 1b/2 clinical trial of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer will be outlined at the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) annual meeting. The study, which is being conducted at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, is designed to examine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Ad-RTS-hIL-12 immunotherapy given following standard of care chemotherapy in up to 40 women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer of all subtypes. The Company expects that outcome data from this study will be presented at a scientific meeting in the second half of the year.

Title: Phase 1b/2 study of intratumoral Ad-RTS-hIL-12 + veledimex in patients with chemotherapy-responsive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
Poster Session: Developmental Therapeutics—Immunotherapy
Date and Time: Sunday, June 5, 2016 8:00 AM — 11:30 AM CT
Abstract Number: TPS3097
Poster: #418a
Location: Hall A

Pfizer to Showcase Diverse and Growing Oncology Portfolio at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2016 Annual Meeting

On May 18, 2016 Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) reported that the company will have its largest presence to date at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago from June 3-7, with more than 40 abstracts spanning a diverse and growing portfolio seeking to tackle numerous cancers and mechanisms of action (Press release, Pfizer, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512545]). Presentations include eight oral presentations and five poster discussions that span Pfizer’s internal and collaborative scientific advances. Highlights include the first presentation of a novel immunotherapy combination study involving a 4-1BB agonist and checkpoint inhibitor as a potential new immunotherapy strategy and new clinical data featuring breakthrough treatments IBRANCE (palbociclib) and XALKORI (crizotinib), as well as investigational assets avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is being developed in collaboration with Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and lorlatinib, a next-generation ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"Our significant presence at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) underscores our long-term commitment to oncology, cutting-edge science and the strength of collaborations to help bring forward potential new medicines that address the serious and complex needs of people battling cancer," said Liz Barrett, global president and general manager, Pfizer Oncology. "We look forward to sharing our findings with the entire oncology community with the hope that our collective efforts will continue to advance innovative approaches and redefine life with cancer."

Immuno-Oncology Highlights

New clinical data from Pfizer’s growing immuno-oncology portfolio features an oral presentation on utomilumab (the proposed generic name for PF-05082566), Pfizer’s novel 4-1BB agonist, in combination with pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with a variety of advanced solid tumors. Numerous other presentations offer new insights from the JAVELIN clinical development program of avelumab, the proposed nonproprietary name for the anti-PD-L1 mAb (also known as MSB0010718C), including new data from the registrational, Phase 2 trial in second-line metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

"Immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment of cancer, and Pfizer is advancing a diverse immuno-oncology pipeline with promise for patients with numerous types of cancer," said Chris Boshoff, vice president and head of early development, translational and immuno-oncology for Pfizer Oncology.

Key oral immuno-oncology presentations include:

Phase 1b study of PF-05082566 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (Tolcher et al)
Avelumab (MSB0010718C; anti-PD-L1) in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy: Results of the Phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (Kaufman et al)
Avelumab (MSB0010718C; anti-PD-L1) in patients with advanced unresectable mesothelioma from the JAVELIN solid tumor phase 1b trial: Safety, clinical activity, and PD-L1 expression (Hassan et al)
Breast Cancer Highlights

IBRANCE data to be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) demonstrate Pfizer’s continued leadership in breast cancer and add to the growing body of knowledge around this first-in-class CDK 4/6 inhibitor in metastatic breast cancer. Since its FDA approval in February 2015, more than 28,000 women have been prescribed IBRANCE by more than 6,800 prescribers in the U.S. IBRANCE is the only CDK 4/6 inhibitor with Phase 3 data in this disease. New Phase 3 PALOMA-2 data to be presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) represent the third randomized pivotal study of IBRANCE in combination with endocrine therapy to demonstrate clinical benefit for women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Key abstracts include:

PALOMA-2: Primary results from a phase III trial of palbociclib with letrozole compared with letrozole alone in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (Finn et al)
Efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer and ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (Turner at al)
Lung Cancer Highlights

Pfizer’s continuing leadership in biomarker-driven treatments for lung cancer will be represented by new data on XALKORI and next-generation investigational treatment lorlatinib, the proposed generic name for PF-06463922.

Key abstracts include:

Safety and efficacy of lorlatinib (PF-06463922) from the dose-escalation component of a study in patients with advanced ALK+ or ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (Solomon et al)
Phase II study of crizotinib in East Asian patients with ROS1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Goto et al)
Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced MET Exon 14-altered non-small cell lung cancer (Drilon et al)
Pfizer Oral Presentation Planner

Title/Abstract Number Date/Time (CDT) Location
(Abstract 512) Efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant (P+F) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA
Turner N

Friday, June 3
5:18 – 5:30 p.m.

Hall D1
(Abstract 3002) Phase 1b study of PF-05082566 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors
Tolcher A

Saturday, June 4
1:39 – 1:51 p.m.

Hall B1
(Abstract 8503) Avelumab* (MSB0010718C; anti-PD-L1) in patients with advanced unresectable mesothelioma from the JAVELIN solid tumor phase 1b trial: Safety, clinical activity, and PD-L1 expression

Hassan R

Sunday, June 5
8:58 – 9:10 a.m.

Arie Crown Theater
(Abstract 11509) Crizotinib in children and adolescents with advanced ROS1, MET, or ALK-rearranged cancer: Results of the AcSé phase II trial
Vassal G

Monday, June 6
9:45 – 9:57 a.m.

S404
(Abstract 108) Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced MET Exon 14-altered non-small cell lung cancer
Drilon A

Monday, June 6
10:09 – 10:21 a.m.

Hall D1
(Abstract 9009) Safety and efficacy of lorlatinib (PF-06463922) from the dose-escalation component of a study in patients with advanced ALK+ or ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer
Solomon B

Monday, June 6
1:15 – 1:27 p.m.

Hall D2
(Abstract 507)
PALOMA-2: Primary results from a phase III trial of palbociclib with letrozole compared with letrozole alone in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

Slamon D

Monday, June 6
3:27 – 3:39 pm

Hall D1
(Abstract 9508)
Avelumab* (MSB0010718C; anti-PD-L1) in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy: Results of the phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial

Kaufman H

Monday, June 6
3:39 – 3:51 p.m.

Arie Crown Theater
* Avelumab is being developed through an alliance between Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer

For a complete list of Pfizer-sponsored abstracts featuring data on our broad pipeline of biologics and small molecules, please visit: View Source

Learn more about how Pfizer Oncology is applying innovative approaches to improve the outlook for people living with cancer at View Source

Post-ASCO Analyst Conference Call

Pfizer invites investors and the general public to view and listen to a webcast of a conference call with investment analysts on Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 10 a.m. EDT to review Pfizer’s oncology business and ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) data presentations.

To pre-register for and access the webcast and conference call, please visit the For Investors section of www.pfizer.com. You can also listen to the conference call by dialing (855) 895-8759 in the United States and Canada or (503) 343-6044 in other countries. The password is ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper). The webcast will be archived on www.pfizer.com.

About IBRANCE (palbociclib) 125mg capsules

IBRANCE is an oral inhibitor of CDKs 4 and 6,i which are key regulators of the cell cycle that trigger cellular progression.ii,iii IBRANCE is indicated for the treatment of HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with letrozole as initial endocrine based therapy in postmenopausal women, or fulvestrant in women with disease progression following endocrine therapy.i The indication in combination with letrozole is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival (PFS). Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial.i

IBRANCE Important Safety Information

Neutropenia was the most frequently reported adverse reaction in Study 1 (PALOMA-1) (75%) and Study 2 (PALOMA-3) (83%). In Study 1, Grade 3 (57%) or 4 (5%) decreased neutrophil counts were reported in patients receiving IBRANCE plus letrozole. In Study 2, Grade 3 (56%) or Grade 4 (11%) decreased neutrophil counts were reported in patients receiving IBRANCE plus fulvestrant. Febrile neutropenia has been reported in about 1% of patients exposed to IBRANCE. One death due to neutropenic sepsis was observed in Study 2. Inform patients to promptly report any fever.

Monitor complete blood count prior to starting IBRANCE, at the beginning of each cycle, on Day 14 of first 2 cycles, and as clinically indicated. Dose interruption, dose reduction, or delay in starting treatment cycles is recommended for patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been reported at a higher rate in patients treated with IBRANCE plus letrozole in Study 1 (5%) and in patients treated with IBRANCE plus fulvestrant in Study 2 (1%) compared with no cases in patients treated either with letrozole alone or fulvestrant plus placebo. Monitor for signs and symptoms of PE and treat as medically appropriate.

Based on the mechanism of action, IBRANCE can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during IBRANCE treatment and for at least 3 weeks after the last dose. IBRANCE may impair fertility in males and has the potential to cause genotoxicity. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during IBRANCE treatment and for 3 months after the last dose. Advise females to inform their healthcare provider of a known or suspected pregnancy. Advise women not to breastfeed during IBRANCE treatment and for 3 weeks after the last dose because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants.

The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in Study 1 of IBRANCE plus letrozole vs letrozole alone included neutropenia (75% vs 5%), leukopenia (43% vs 3%), fatigue (41% vs 23%), anemia (35% vs 7%), upper respiratory infection (31% vs 18%), nausea (25% vs 13%), stomatitis (25% vs 7%), alopecia (22% vs 3%), diarrhea (21% vs 10%), thrombocytopenia (17% vs 1%), decreased appetite (16% vs 7%), vomiting (15% vs 4%), asthenia (13% vs 4%), peripheral neuropathy (13% vs 5%), and epistaxis (11% vs 1%).

Grade 3/4 adverse reactions (≥10%) in Study 1 reported at a higher incidence in the IBRANCE plus letrozole group vs the letrozole alone group included neutropenia (54% vs 1%) and leukopenia (19% vs 0%). The most frequently reported serious adverse events in patients receiving IBRANCE plus letrozole were pulmonary embolism (4%) and diarrhea (2%).

Lab abnormalities occurring in Study 1 (all grades, IBRANCE plus letrozole vs letrozole alone) were decreased WBC (95% vs 26%), decreased neutrophils (94% vs 17%), decreased lymphocytes (81% vs 35%), decreased hemoglobin (83% vs 40%), and decreased platelets (61% vs 16%).

The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in Study 2 of IBRANCE plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant plus placebo included neutropenia (83% vs 4%), leukopenia (53% vs 5%), infections (47% vs 31%), fatigue (41% vs 29%), nausea (34% vs 28%), anemia (30% vs 13%), stomatitis (28% vs 13%), headache (26% vs 20%), diarrhea (24% vs 19%), thrombocytopenia (23% vs 0%), constipation (20% vs 16%), vomiting (19% vs 15%), alopecia (18% vs 6%), rash (17% vs 6%), decreased appetite (16% vs 8%), and pyrexia (13% vs 5%).

Grade 3/4 adverse reactions (≥10%) in Study 2 reported at a higher incidence in the IBRANCE plus fulvestrant group vs the fulvestrant plus placebo group included neutropenia (66% vs 1%) and leukopenia (31% vs 2%). The most frequently reported serious adverse reactions in patients receiving IBRANCE plus fulvestrant were infections (3%), pyrexia (1%), neutropenia (1%), and pulmonary embolism (1%).

Lab abnormalities occurring in Study 2 (all grades, IBRANCE plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant plus placebo) were decreased WBC (99% vs 26%), decreased neutrophils (96% vs 14%), anemia (78% vs 40%), and decreased platelets (62% vs 10%).

Avoid concurrent use of strong CYP3A inhibitors. If patients must be administered a strong CYP3A inhibitor, reduce the IBRANCE dose to 75 mg/day. If the strong inhibitor is discontinued, increase the IBRANCE dose (after 3-5 half-lives of the inhibitor) to the dose used prior to the initiation of the strong CYP3A inhibitor. Grapefruit or grapefruit juice may increase plasma concentrations of IBRANCE and should be avoided. Avoid concomitant use of strong CYP3A inducers. The dose of sensitive CYP3A substrates with a narrow therapeutic index may need to be reduced as IBRANCE may increase their exposure.

IBRANCE has not been studied in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment or in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min).

The full prescribing information for IBRANCE can be found at www.pfizer.com.

About XALKORI (crizotinib)

XALKORI is a kinase inhibitor indicated in the U.S. for the treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test, and for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors are ROS1-positive. XALKORI was the first ALK inhibitor approved in the U.S. and has been used to treat more than 8,000 patients to date.iv

XALKORI Important Safety Information

Hepatotoxicity: Drug-induced hepatotoxicity with fatal outcome occurred in 0.1% of patients treated with XALKORI across clinical trials (n=1719). Transaminase elevations generally occurred within the first 2 months. Monitor with liver function tests including ALT, AST, and total bilirubin every 2 weeks during the first 2 months of treatment, then once a month and as clinically indicated, with more frequent repeat testing for increased liver transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin in patients who develop transaminase elevations. Permanently discontinue for ALT/AST elevation >3 times ULN with concurrent total bilirubin elevation >1.5 times ULN (in the absence of cholestasis or hemolysis); otherwise, temporarily suspend and dose-reduce XALKORI as indicated.

Interstitial Lung Disease (Pneumonitis): Severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis can occur. Across clinical trials (n=1719), 2.9% of XALKORI-treated patients had any grade ILD, 1.0% had Grade 3/4, and 0.5% had fatal ILD. ILD generally occurred within 3 months after initiation of treatment. Monitor for pulmonary symptoms indicative of ILD/pneumonitis. Exclude other potential causes and permanently discontinue XALKORI in patients with drug-related ILD/pneumonitis.

QT Interval Prolongation: QTc prolongation can occur. Across clinical trials (n=1616), 2.1% of patients had QTcF (corrected QT by the Fridericia method) ≥500 ms and 5.0% had an increase from baseline QTcF ≥60 ms by automated machine-read evaluation of ECGs. Avoid use in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Monitor with ECGs and electrolytes in patients with congestive heart failure, bradyarrhythmias, electrolyte abnormalities, or who are taking medications that prolong the QT interval. Permanently discontinue XALKORI in patients who develop QTc >500 ms or ≥60 ms change from baseline with Torsade de pointes, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, or signs/symptoms of serious arrhythmia. Withhold XALKORI in patients who develop QTc >500 ms on at least 2 separate ECGs until recovery to a QTc ≤480 ms, then resume at a reduced dose.

Bradycardia: Symptomatic bradycardia can occur. Across clinical trials, bradycardia occurred in 12.7% of patients treated with XALKORI (n=1719). Avoid use in combination with other agents known to cause bradycardia. Monitor heart rate and blood pressure regularly. In cases of symptomatic bradycardia that is not life-threatening, hold XALKORI until recovery to asymptomatic bradycardia or to a heart rate of ≥60 bpm, re-evaluate the use of concomitant medications, and adjust the dose of XALKORI. Permanently discontinue for life-threatening bradycardia due to XALKORI; however, if associated with concomitant medications known to cause bradycardia or hypotension, hold XALKORI until recovery to asymptomatic bradycardia or to a heart rate of ≥60 bpm. If concomitant medications can be adjusted or discontinued, restart XALKORI at 250 mg once daily with frequent monitoring.

Severe Visual Loss: Across clinical trials, the incidence of Grade 4 visual field defect with vision loss was 0.2% (n=1719). Discontinue XALKORI in patients with new onset of severe visual loss (best corrected vision less than 20/200 in one or both eyes). Perform an ophthalmological evaluation. There is insufficient information to characterize the risks of resumption of XALKORI in patients with a severe visual loss; a decision to resume should consider the potential benefits to the patient.

Vision Disorders: Most commonly visual impairment, photopsia, blurred vision or vitreous floaters, occurred in 63.1% of 1719 patients. The majority (95%) of these patients had Grade 1 visual adverse reactions. 0.8% of patients had Grade 3 and 0.2% had Grade 4 visual impairment. The majority of patients on the XALKORI arms in Studies 1 and 2 (>50%) reported visual disturbances which occurred at a frequency of 4-7 days each week, lasted up to 1 minute, and had mild or no impact on daily activities.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: XALKORI can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential and males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment and for at least 45 days (females) or 90 days (males) respectively, following the final dose of XALKORI.

ROS1-positive Metastatic NSCLC: Safety was evaluated in 50 patients with ROS1-positive metastatic NSCLC from a single-arm study, and was generally consistent with the safety profile of XALKORI evaluated in patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC. Vision disorders occurred in 92% of patients in the ROS1 study; 90% of patients had Grade 1 vision disorders and 2% had Grade 2.

Adverse Reactions: Safety was evaluated in a phase 3 study in previously untreated patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC randomized to XALKORI (n=171) or chemotherapy (n=169). Serious adverse events were reported in 34% of patients treated with XALKORI, the most frequent were dyspnea (4.1%) and pulmonary embolism (2.9%). Fatal adverse events in XALKORI-treated patients occurred in 2.3% of patients, consisting of septic shock, acute respiratory failure, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Common adverse reactions (all grades) occurring in ≥25% and more commonly (≥5%) in patients treated with XALKORI vs chemotherapy were vision disorder (71% vs 10%), diarrhea (61% vs 13%), edema (49% vs 12%), vomiting (46% vs 36%), constipation (43% vs 30%), upper respiratory infection (32% vs 12%), dysgeusia (26% vs 5%), and abdominal pain (26% vs 12%). Grade 3/4 reactions occurring at a ≥2% higher incidence with XALKORI vs chemotherapy were QT prolongation (2% vs 0%), and constipation (2% vs 0%). In patients treated with XALKORI vs chemotherapy, the following occurred: elevation of ALT (any grade [79% vs 33%] or Grade 3/4 [15% vs 2%]); elevation of AST (any grade [66% vs 28%] or Grade 3/4 [8% vs 1%]); neutropenia (any grade [52% vs 59%] or Grade 3/4 [11% vs 16%]); lymphopenia (any grade [48% vs 53%] or Grade 3/4 [7% vs 13%]); hypophosphatemia (any grade [32% vs 21%] or Grade 3/4 [10% vs 6%]). In patients treated with XALKORI vs chemotherapy, renal cysts occurred (5% vs 1%). Nausea (56%), decreased appetite (30%), fatigue (29%), and neuropathy (21%) also occurred in patients taking XALKORI.

Drug Interactions: Exercise caution with concomitant use of moderate CYP3A inhibitors. Avoid grapefruit or grapefruit juice which may increase plasma concentrations of crizotinib. Avoid concomitant use of strong CYP3A inducers and inhibitors. Avoid concomitant use of CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic range in patients taking XALKORI. If concomitant use of CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic range is required in patients taking XALKORI, dose reductions of the CYP3A substrates may be required due to adverse reactions.

Lactation: Because of the potential for adverse reactions in breastfed infants, advise females not to breast feed during treatment with XALKORI and for 45 days after the final dose.

Hepatic Impairment: XALKORI has not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment. As crizotinib is extensively metabolized in the liver, hepatic impairment is likely to increase plasma crizotinib concentrations. Use caution in patients with hepatic impairment.

Renal Impairment: Decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate occurred in patients treated with XALKORI. Administer XALKORI at a starting dose of 250 mg taken orally once daily in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min) not requiring dialysis. No starting dose adjustment is needed for patients with mild and moderate renal impairment.

For more information and full Prescribing Information, visit www.XALKORI.com (link is external).

Amgen Data To Be Presented At ASCO 2016 Demonstrates More Insights Into Treatment Options For Patients

On May 18, 2016 Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) reported that new clinical data from across the oncology portfolio, including Kyprolis (carfilzomib), IMLYGIC (talimogene laherparepvec), Vectibix (panitumumab) and Neulasta (pegfilgrastim) will be presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) in Chicago, June 3-7, 2016 (Press release, Amgen, MAY 18, 2016, View Source;p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=2169505 [SID:1234512566]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"As a leader in patient-focused oncology research, Amgen is committed to translating innovative science into treatments that make a difference in the lives of people suffering from cancer," said Sean E. Harper, M.D., executive vice president of Research and Development at Amgen. "The breadth and depth of data we’re presenting at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) demonstrates our commitment to finding solutions to some of the toughest cancers. We are thankful for our research partners who help us achieve this mission, and we look forward to sharing these results at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)."

Amongst the Kyprolis abstracts to be presented at the meeting will be a new subgroup analysis from the Phase 3 ASPIRE trial which compared Kyprolis in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients who had early disease progression following prior therapy (including transplant).

Presentations highlighting Kyprolis data include:

Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd) vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM) and Early Progression During Prior Therapy: Secondary Analysis From the Phase 3 Study ASPIRE (NCT01080391)
Abstract #8045, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Risk of Hypertension (HTN) and Malignant Hypertension (mHTN) in Patients Treated for Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Abstract #8049, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Transitions Across Different Lines of Therapy in the Medicare-Enrolled Patient Population with Multiple Myeloma
Abstract #8043, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Treatment Regimens and Duration of Lines of Therapy in Medicare-Enrolled Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Abstract #8046, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Costs Associated With Treatment Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Abstract #8048, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Healthcare Costs Among Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients (Pts) without Stem Cell Transplant (SCT)
Abstract #8059, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Retrospective Study of Frequency and Cost of Multiple Myeloma (MM) Complications and Treatment (Tx) Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Abstract #8060, Poster, Monday, June 6 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Economic Evaluation of Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (KRd) vs. Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (R/RMM)
Abstract #8021, Poster Discussion, Monday, June 6 at 3 p.m. CDT in McCormick Place, E354b
Two abstracts on the MASTERKEY-265 trial of IMLYGIC in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable Stage IIIB-IV melanoma will be presented:

Efficacy Analysis of MASTERKEY-265 Phase 1b Study of Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) and Pembrolizumab (Pembro) for Unresectable Stage IIIB‑IV Melanoma
Abstract #9568, Poster Presentation, Saturday, June 4 from 1-4:30 p.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
A Phase 1/3, Multicenter Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination with Pembrolizumab for Unresected, Stage IIIB-IV Melanoma (MASTERKEY-265)
Abstract #TPS9598, Poster Presentation, Saturday, June 4 from 1-4:30 p.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Key data from two abstracts and one publication will be presented on Vectibix, including the final results from a Phase 3 trial of Vectibix and best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 and wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC):

Association of ECOG Performance Status with Efficacy in Patients Receiving Panitumumab with Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs. BSC Alone for Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Publication only
Final Results from a Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Panitumumab (pmab) + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs. BSC in Chemorefractory Wild-type (WT) KRAS Exon 2 and WT RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
Abstract #3536, Poster, Saturday, June 4 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Efficacy of Panitumumab vs. Cetuximab in Patients with Wild-type KRAS Exon 2 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Prior Bevacizumab: Results from ASPECCT
Abstract #3538, Poster, Saturday, June 4 at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Three abstracts will be presented on Neulasta and NEUPOGEN (filgrastim), providing new insights into their role in supportive care, including:

NOLAN: A Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Estimate the Effect of Prophylactic Naproxen (N) or Loratadine (L) vs. No Intervention on Bone Pain in 600 Patients (pts) with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy (chemo) and Pegfilgrastim (PEG)
Abstract #10021, Poster Discussion, Monday, June 6 at 4:45 p.m. CDT in McCormick Place, S102
Burden of Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations (FNH) in U.S. Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis (CP)
Abstract #6568, Poster, Saturday, June 4 at 1 p.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Risk Factors for Febrile Neutropenia in Cancer Patients Treated With Chemotherapy
Abstract #6559, Poster, Saturday, June 4 at 1 p.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
One abstract will be presented on investigational agent ABP 215, which is being developed as a biosimilar to bevacizumab:

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of ABP 215 Compared with Bevacizumab in Patients with Non-Squamous NSCLC
Abstract #9095, Poster Presentation, Saturday, June 4, at 8 a.m. CDT in McCormick Place, Hall A
Abstracts are currently available on the ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) website.

About Kyprolis (carfilzomib)
Proteasomes play an important role in cell function and growth by breaking down proteins that are damaged or no longer needed.1 Kyprolis has been shown to block proteasomes, leading to an excessive build-up of proteins within cells.2 In some cells, Kyprolis can cause cell death, especially in myeloma cells because they are more likely to contain a higher amount of abnormal proteins.2 The irreversibility of Kyprolis’ binding has also been shown to offer a more sustained inhibition of the targeted enzymes.3

Kyprolis is approved in the U.S. for the following:

In combination with dexamethasone or with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three lines of therapy.
As a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one or more lines of therapy.
Kyprolis is also approved in Argentina, Israel, Kuwait, Mexico, Thailand, Colombia, Korea, Canada and the European Union. Additional regulatory applications for Kyprolis are underway and have been submitted to health authorities worldwide.

Kyprolis is a product of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Onyx Pharmaceuticals is a subsidiary of Amgen and holds development and commercialization rights to Kyprolis globally, excluding Japan.

For more information, please visit www.kyprolis.com.

Important Safety Information Regarding Kyprolis (carfilzomib) for Injection

INDICATION(S)

KYPROLIS (carfilzomib) is indicated in combination with dexamethasone or with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three lines of therapy.
KYPROLIS (carfilzomib) is indicated as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one or more lines of therapy.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Cardiac Toxicities

New onset or worsening of pre-existing cardiac failure (e.g., congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, decreased ejection fraction), restrictive cardiomyopathy, myocardial ischemia, and myocardial infarction including fatalities have occurred following administration of KYPROLIS. Some events occurred in patients with normal baseline ventricular function. Death due to cardiac arrest has occurred within one day of KYPROLIS administration.
Monitor patients for clinical signs or symptoms of cardiac failure or cardiac ischemia. Evaluate promptly if cardiac toxicity is suspected. Withhold KYPROLIS for Grade 3 or 4 cardiac adverse events until recovery, and consider whether to restart KYPROLIS at 1 dose level reduction based on a benefit/risk assessment.
While adequate hydration is required prior to each dose in Cycle 1, monitor all patients for evidence of volume overload, especially patients at risk for cardiac failure. Adjust total fluid intake as clinically appropriate in patients with baseline cardiac failure or who are at risk for cardiac failure.
In Patients > 75 years, the risk of cardiac failure is increased. Patients with New York Heart Association Class III and IV heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, conduction abnormalities, angina, or arrhythmias may be at greater risk for cardiac complications and should have a comprehensive medical assessment (including blood pressure and fluid management) prior to starting treatment with KYPROLIS and remain under close follow-up.
Acute Renal Failure

Cases of acute renal failure and renal insufficiency adverse events (including renal failure) have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Acute renal failure was reported more frequently in patients with advanced relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who received KYPROLIS monotherapy. Monitor renal function with regular measurement of the serum creatinine and/or estimated creatinine clearance. Reduce or withhold dose as appropriate.
Tumor Lysis Syndrome

Cases of Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS), including fatal outcomes, have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Patients with multiple myeloma and a high tumor burden should be considered at greater risk for TLS. Adequate hydration is required prior to each dose in Cycle 1, and in subsequent cycles as needed. Consider uric acid lowering drugs in patients at risk for TLS. Monitor for evidence of TLS during treatment and manage promptly. Withhold KYPROLIS until TLS is resolved.
Pulmonary Toxicity

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), acute respiratory failure, and acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease such as pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Some events have been fatal. In the event of drug-induced pulmonary toxicity, discontinue KYPROLIS.
Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was reported in patients treated with KYPROLIS. Evaluate with cardiac imaging and/or other tests as indicated. Withhold KYPROLIS for PAH until resolved or returned to baseline and consider whether to restart KYPROLIS based on a benefit/risk assessment.
Dyspnea

Dyspnea was reported in patients treated with KYPROLIS. Evaluate dyspnea to exclude cardiopulmonary conditions including cardiac failure and pulmonary syndromes. Stop KYPROLIS for Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea until resolved or returned to baseline. Consider whether to restart KYPROLIS based on a benefit/risk assessment.
Hypertension

Hypertension, including hypertensive crisis and hypertensive emergency, has been observed with KYPROLIS. Some of these events have been fatal. Monitor blood pressure regularly in all patients. If hypertension cannot be adequately controlled, withhold KYPROLIS and evaluate. Consider whether to restart KYPROLIS based on a benefit/risk assessment.
Venous Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolic events (including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) have been observed with KYPROLIS. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for patients being treated with the combination of KYPROLIS with dexamethasone or with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. The thromboprophylaxis regimen should be based on an assessment of the patient’s underlying risks.
Patients using oral contraceptives or a hormonal method of contraception associated with a risk of thrombosis should consider an alternative method of effective contraception during treatment with KYPROLIS in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.
Infusion Reactions

Infusion reactions, including life-threatening reactions, have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Symptoms include fever, chills, arthralgia, myalgia, facial flushing, facial edema, vomiting, weakness, shortness of breath, hypotension, syncope, chest tightness, or angina. These reactions can occur immediately following or up to 24 hours after administration of KYPROLIS. Premedicate with dexamethasone to reduce the incidence and severity of infusion reactions. Inform patients of the risk and of symptoms of an infusion reaction and to contact a physician immediately if they occur.
Thrombocytopenia

KYPROLIS causes thrombocytopenia with recovery to baseline platelet count usually by the start of the next cycle. Thrombocytopenia was reported in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Monitor platelet counts frequently during treatment with KYPROLIS. Reduce or withhold dose as appropriate.
Hepatic Toxicity and Hepatic Failure

Cases of hepatic failure, including fatal cases, have been reported during treatment with KYPROLIS. KYPROLIS can cause increased serum transaminases. Monitor liver enzymes regularly regardless of baseline values. Reduce or withhold dose as appropriate.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Cases of thrombotic microangiopathy, including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS), including fatal outcome have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. Monitor for signs and symptoms of TTP/HUS. Discontinue KYPROLIS if diagnosis is suspected. If the diagnosis of TTP/HUS is excluded, KYPROLIS may be restarted. The safety of reinitiating KYPROLIS therapy in patients previously experiencing TTP/HUS is not known.
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)

Cases of PRES have occurred in patients receiving KYPROLIS. PRES was formerly known as Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome. Consider a neuroradiological imaging (MRI) for onset of visual or neurological symptoms. Discontinue KYPROLIS if PRES is suspected and evaluate. The safety of reinitiating KYPROLIS therapy in patients previously experiencing PRES is not known.
Embryo-fetal Toxicity

KYPROLIS can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman based on its mechanism of action and findings in animals.
Females of reproductive potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant while being treated with KYPROLIS. Males of reproductive potential should be advised to avoid fathering a child while being treated with KYPROLIS. If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if pregnancy occurs while taking this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus.
ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse events occurring in at least 20% of patients treated with KYPROLIS in the combination therapy trials: anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, insomnia, muscle spasm, cough, upper respiratory tract infection, hypokalemia.
The most common adverse events occurring in at least 20% of patients treated with KYPROLIS in monotherapy trials: anemia, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, nausea, pyrexia, dyspnea, diarrhea, headache, cough, edema peripheral.
Please see full Prescribing Information at www.kyprolis.com.

About IMLYGIC (talimogene laherparepvec)
IMLYGIC is a genetically modified herpes simplex type 1 virus that is injected directly into tumors. IMLYGIC replicates inside tumor cells and produces GM-CSF, an immunostimulatory protein. IMLYGIC then causes the cell to rupture and die in a process called lysis. The rupture of the cancer cells causes the release of tumor-derived antigens, which together with virally derived GM-CSF may help to promote an anti-tumor immune response. However, the exact mechanism of action is unknown.

IMLYGIC is the first oncolytic viral therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on therapeutic benefit demonstrated in a pivotal study. IMLYGIC is a genetically modified oncolytic viral therapy indicated for the local treatment of unresectable cutaneous, subcutaneous, and nodal lesions in patients with melanoma recurrent after initial surgery. IMLYGIC has not been shown to improve overall survival or have an effect on visceral metastases.

Important Safety Information

Contraindications

Do not administer IMLYGIC to immunocompromised patients, including those with a history of primary or acquired immunodeficient states, leukemia, lymphoma, AIDS or other clinical manifestations of infection with human immunodeficiency viruses, and those on immunosuppressive therapy, due to the risk of life-threatening disseminated herpetic infection.
Do not administer IMLYGIC to pregnant patients.
Warnings and Precautions

Accidental exposure to IMLYGIC may lead to transmission of IMLYGIC and herpetic infection, including during preparation and administration. Health care providers, close contacts, pregnant women, and newborns should avoid direct contact with injected lesions, dressings, or body fluids of treated patients. The affected area in exposed individuals should be cleaned thoroughly with soap and water and/or a disinfectant.
Caregivers should wear protective gloves when assisting patients in applying or changing occlusive dressings and observe safety precautions for disposal of used dressings, gloves, and cleaning materials. Exposed individuals should clean the affected area thoroughly with soap and water and/or a disinfectant.
To prevent possible inadvertent transfer of IMLYGIC to other areas of the body, patients should be advised to avoid touching or scratching injection sites or occlusive dressings.
Herpetic infections: Herpetic infections (including cold sores and herpetic keratitis) have been reported in IMLYGIC-treated patients. Disseminated herpetic infection may also occur in immunocompromised patients. Patients who develop suspicious herpes-like lesions should follow standard hygienic practices to prevent viral transmission.
Patients or close contacts with suspected signs or symptoms of a herpetic infection should contact their health care provider to evaluate the lesions. Suspected herpetic lesions should be reported to Amgen at 1-855-IMLYGIC (1-855-465-9442). Patients or close contacts have the option of follow-up testing for further characterization of the infection.
IMLYGIC is sensitive to acyclovir. Acyclovir or other antiviral agents may interfere with the effectiveness of IMLYGIC. Consider the risks and benefits of IMLYGIC treatment before administering antiviral agents to manage herpetic infection.
Injection Site Complications: Necrosis or ulceration of tumor tissue may occur during IMLYGIC treatment. Cellulitis and systemic bacterial infection have been reported in clinical studies. Careful wound care and infection precautions are recommended, particularly if tissue necrosis results in open wounds.
Impaired healing at the injection site has been reported. IMLYGIC may increase the risk of impaired healing in patients with underlying risk factors (e.g., previous radiation at the injection site or lesions in poorly vascularized areas). If there is persistent infection or delayed healing of the injection site, consider the risks and benefits of continuing treatment.
Immune-Mediated events including glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, pneumonitis, worsening psoriasis, and vitiligo have been reported in patients treated with IMLYGIC. Consider the risks and benefits of IMLYGIC before initiating treatment in patients who have underlying autoimmune disease or before continuing treatment in patients who develop immune-mediated events.
Plasmacytoma at Injection Site: Plasmacytoma in proximity to the injection site has been reported in a patient with smoldering multiple myeloma after IMLYGIC administration in a clinical study. Consider the risks and benefits of IMLYGIC in patients with multiple myeloma or in whom plasmacytoma develops during treatment.
Adverse Reactions

The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions (>25%) in IMLYGIC-treated patients were fatigue, chills, pyrexia, nausea, influenza-like illness, and injection site pain. Pyrexia, chills, and influenza-like illness can occur at any time during IMLYGIC treatment, but were more frequent during the first 3 months of treatment.
The most common Grade 3 or higher adverse reaction was cellulitis.
Please see full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide for IMLYGIC at www.IMLYGIC.com.

About Vectibix (panitumumab)
Vectibix is the first fully human monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Vectibix was approved in the U.S. in September 2006 as a monotherapy for the treatment of patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC after disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy.

In May 2014, the FDA approved Vectibix for use in combination with FOLFOX, as first-line treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2) mCRC. With this approval, Vectibix became the first-and-only biologic therapy indicated for use with FOLFOX, one of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens, in the first-line treatment of mCRC for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.

Important U.S. Product Information
Vectibix is indicated for the treatment of patients with wild-type KRAS (exon 2 in codons 12 or 13) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as determined by an FDA-approved test for this use:

As first-line therapy in combination with FOLFOX
As monotherapy following disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy
Limitation of Use: Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with RAS-mutant mCRC or for whom RAS mutation status is unknown.

WARNING: DERMATOLOGIC TOXICITY
Dermatologic Toxicity: Dermatologic toxicities occurred in 90 percent of patients and were severe (NCI-CTC grade 3 or higher) in 15% of patients receiving Vectibix monotherapy.

In Study 1, dermatologic toxicities occurred in 90% of patients and were severe (NCI-CTC grade 3 and higher) in 15% of patients with mCRC receiving Vectibix. The clinical manifestations included, but were not limited to, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus, erythema, rash, skin exfoliation, paronychia, dry skin and skin fissures.

Monitor patients who develop dermatologic or soft tissue toxicities while receiving Vectibix for the development of inflammatory or infectious sequelae. Life-threatening and fatal infectious complications including necrotizing fasciitis, abscesses and sepsis have been observed in patients treated with Life-threatening and fatal bullous mucocutaneous disease with blisters, erosions and skin sloughing has also been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. It could not be determined whether these mucocutaneous adverse reactions were directly related to EGFR inhibition or to idiosyncratic immune-related effects (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis). Withhold or discontinue Vectibix for dermatologic or soft tissue toxicity associated with severe or life-threatening inflammatory or infectious complications. Dose modifications for Vectibix concerning dermatologic toxicity are provided in the product labeling. Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that harbor somatic mutations in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13), exon 3 (codons 59 and 61), and exon 4 (codons 117 and 146) of either KRAS or NRAS and hereafter is referred to as "RAS."

Retrospective subset analyses across several randomized clinical trials were conducted to investigate the role of RAS mutations on the clinical effects of anti-EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab). Anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with tumors containing RAS mutations resulted in exposing those patients to anti-EGFR related adverse reactions without clinical benefit from these agents.

Additionally, in Study 3, 272 patients with RAS-mutant mCRC tumors received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX and 276 patients received FOLFOX alone. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, OS was shorter (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.45) in patients with RAS-mutant mCRC who received Vectibix and FOLFOX versus FOLFOX alone.

Progressively decreasing serum magnesium levels leading to severe (Grade 3-4) hypomagnesemia occurred in up to 7% (in Study 2) of patients across clinical trials. Monitor patients for hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia prior to initiating Vectibix treatment, periodically during Vectibix treatment, and for up to 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Other electrolyte disturbances, including hypokalemia, have also been observed. Replete magnesium and other electrolytes as appropriate.

In Study 1, 4% of patients experienced infusion reactions and 1% of patients experienced severe infusion reactions (NCI-CTC grade 3-4). Infusion reactions, manifesting as fever, chills, dyspnea, bronchospasm, and hypotension, can occur following Vectibix administration. Fatal infusion reactions occurred in postmarketing experience. Terminate the infusion for severe infusion reactions.

Severe diarrhea and dehydration, leading to acute renal failure and other complications, have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix in combination with chemotherapy.

Fatal and non-fatal cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (1%) and pulmonary fibrosis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Pulmonary fibrosis occurred in less than 1% (2/1467) of patients enrolled in clinical studies of Vectibix. In the event of acute onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms, interrupt Vectibix therapy. Discontinue Vectibix therapy if ILD is confirmed.

In patients with a history of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, the benefits of therapy with Vectibix versus the risk of pulmonary complications must be carefully considered.

Exposure to sunlight can exacerbate dermatologic toxicity. Advise patients to wear sunscreen and hats and limit sun exposure while receiving Vectibix.

Keratitis and ulcerative keratitis, known risk factors for corneal perforation, have been reported with Vectibix use. Monitor for evidence of keratitis or ulcerative keratitis. Interrupt or discontinue Vectibix for acute or worsening keratitis.

In an interim analysis of an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in the first-line setting in patients with mCRC, the addition of Vectibix to the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy resulted in decreased OS and increased incidence of NCI-CTC grade 3–5 (87% vs 72%) adverse reactions. NCI-CTC grade 3–4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients included rash/acneiform dermatitis (26% vs 1%), diarrhea (23% vs 12%), dehydration (16% vs 5%; primarily occurring in patients with diarrhea), hypokalemia (10% vs 4%), stomatitis/mucositis (4% vs < 1%), and hypomagnesemia (4% vs 0).

NCI-CTC grade 3–5 pulmonary embolism occurred at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients (7% vs 3%) and included fatal events in three (< 1%) Vectibix-treated patients.

As a result of the toxicities experienced, patients randomized to Vectibix, bevacizumab and chemotherapy received a lower mean relative dose intensity of each chemotherapeutic agent (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus 5-FU, and/or infusional 5-FU) over the first 24 weeks on study, compared with those randomized to bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

Advise patients of the need for adequate contraception in both males and females while receiving Vectibix and for 6 months after the last dose of Vectibix therapy. Vectibix may be transmitted from the mother to the developing fetus, and has the potential to cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women.

Because many drugs are excreted into human milk and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from Vectibix, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. If nursing is interrupted, it should not be resumed earlier than 2 months following the last dose of Vectibix.

Women who become pregnant during Vectibix treatment are encouraged to enroll in Amgen’s Pregnancy Surveillance Program. Women who are nursing during Vectibix treatment are encouraged to enroll in Amgen’s Lactation Surveillance Program. Patients or their physicians should call 1-800-77-AMGEN (1-800-772-6436) to enroll.

In Study 1, the most common adverse reactions (> 20%) with Vectibix were skin rash with variable presentations, paronychia, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. The most common (> 5%) serious adverse reactions in the Vectibix arm were general physical health deterioration and intestinal obstruction.

In Study 3, the most commonly reported adverse reactions (> 20%) in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC receiving Vectibix (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and FOLFOX therapy (N = 322) were diarrhea, stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, asthenia, paronychia, anorexia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, rash, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus and dry skin. Serious adverse reactions (> 2% difference between treatment arms) in Vectibix-treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC were diarrhea and dehydration.

To see the Vectibix Prescribing Information, including Boxed Warning visit www.vectibix.com.

In the EU, Vectibix is currently indicated for the treatment of adult patients with wild-type RAS mCRC:

in first-line in combination with FOLFOX and FOLFIRI.
in second-line in combination with FOLFIRI for patients who have received first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (excluding irinotecan).
as monotherapy after failure of fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens.
About Neulasta (pegfilgrastim)
Neulasta is indicated to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia. Neulasta is not indicated for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

In a pivotal clinical trial, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia, treatment with Neulasta was shown to significantly reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia..

Neulasta is administered by manual injection and is also available via the Neulasta OnproTM kit, which was approved by the FDA in 2014 and includes a specially designed, single-use prefilled syringe co-packaged with an on-body injector for Neulasta.
For more information about Neulasta, visit www.Neulasta.com and www.NeulastaHCP.com.

Important Safety Information Regarding Neulasta

Contraindication
Do not administer Neulasta to patients with a history of serious allergic reactions to pegfilgrastim or filgrastim.

Splenic Rupture
Splenic rupture, including fatal cases, can occur following the administration of Neulasta. Evaluate for an enlarged spleen or splenic rupture in patients who report left upper abdominal or shoulder pain after receiving Neulasta.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can occur in patients receiving Neulasta. Evaluate patients who develop fever and lung infiltrates or respiratory distress after receiving Neulasta for ARDS. Discontinue Neulasta in patients with ARDS.

Serious Allergic Reactions

Serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, can occur in patients receiving Neulasta. The majority of reported events occurred upon initial exposure. Allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, can recur within days after the discontinuation of initial anti-allergic treatment. Permanently discontinue Neulasta in patients with serious allergic reactions.

Allergies to Acrylics
The on-body injector for Neulasta uses acrylic adhesive. For patients who have reactions to acrylic adhesives, use of this product may result in a significant reaction.

Use in Patients with Sickle Cell Disorders
Severe sickle cell crises can occur in patients with sickle cell disorders receiving Neulasta. Severe and sometimes fatal sickle cell crises can occur in patients with sickle cell disorders receiving filgrastim, the parent compound of pegfilgrastim.

Glomerulonephritis
Glomerulonephritis has been reported in patients receiving Neulasta. The diagnoses were based upon azotemia, hematuria (microscopic and macroscopic), proteinuria, and renal biopsy. Generally, events of glomerulonephritis resolved after withdrawal of Neulasta. If glomerulonephritis is suspected, evaluate for cause. If causality is likely, consider dose‐reduction or interruption of Neulasta.

Leukocytosis
White blood cell counts of 100 x 109/L or greater have been observed in patients receiving pegfilgrastim. Monitoring of CBCs during pegfilgrastim therapy is recommended.

Capillary Leak Syndrome
Capillary leak syndrome has been reported after granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) administration, including Neulasta, and is characterized by hypotension, hypoalbuminemia, edema, and hemoconcentration. Episodes vary in frequency, severity and may be life‐threatening if treatment is delayed. Patients who develop symptoms of capillary leak syndrome should be closely monitored and receive standard symptomatic treatment, which may include a need for intensive care.

Potential for Tumor Growth Stimulatory Effects on Malignant Cells
The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor, through which pegfilgrastim and filgrastim act, has been found on tumor cell lines. The possibility that pegfilgrastim acts as a growth factor for any tumor type, including myeloid malignancies and myelodysplasia, diseases for which pegfilgrastim is not approved, cannot be excluded.

The most common adverse reactions (≥ 5% difference in incidence) in placebo-controlled clinical trials are bone pain and pain in extremity.

Please see additional Neulasta Safety Information, by visiting www.amgen.com/medpro/products.html.

Please see the Neulasta Full Prescribing Information by clicking here.

About ABP 215
ABP 215 is being developed as a biosimilar to bevacizumab, which is approved in specific combinations in the U.S., EU and other regions for the treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC as well as metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; and other region-specific indications.

Myriad to Present New Research at the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

On May 18, 2016 Myriad Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYGN) reported it will present data from nine clinical studies with three different products at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) annual meeting to be held June 3-7, 2016 in Chicago, Ill (Press release, Myriad Genetics, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512587]). Key podium presentations will highlight the safety and validity of the Myriad myRisk Hereditary Cancer multigene panel test in assessing hereditary cancer risk. Abstracts of the Company’s presentations are available at: abstracts.asco.org.

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

"We’re excited that the studies with myRisk Hereditary Cancer being presented at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) will advance the state-of-the-art of hereditary cancer testing," said Johnathan Lancaster, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical officer, Myriad Genetic Laboratories. "In particular, our new data provide additional evidence for expanding testing to a broader set of patients at risk for developing hereditary cancers, and for understanding the risks associated with mutations."

Myriad’s presentations are listed below. Follow Myriad on Twitter via @MyriadGenetics to stay informed about news and updates from the Company.

myRisk Hereditary Cancer Presentations
Podium Presentations


Title: Yield of multiplex panel testing exceeds expert opinion and validated prediction models.
Presenter: Gregory Idos
Date: Sunday, June 5, 2016, 9:45 – 9:57 a.m.
Location: S404, Abstract:1509

Title: Ovarian cancer (OC) risk associated with mutations detected by multiple-gene germline sequencing in 95,561 women.
Presenter: Allison Kurian
Date: Monday, June 6, 2016, 10:09 – 10:21 a.m.
Location: E450ab, Abstract: 5510

Title: Safety of multiplex gene testing for inherited cancer risk: interim analysis of a clinical trial.
Presenter: Allison Kurian
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016, 8:36 – 8:48 a.m.
Location: S102, Abstract:1503

Title: Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer risk genes among unselected colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts).
Presenter: Matthew Yurgelun
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016, 8:12 – 8:24 a.m.
Location: S102, Abstract:1501

Poster Presentations


Title: Genetic heterogeneity and survival among pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with positive family history.
Presenter: Gloria Petersen
Date: Saturday, June 4, 2016, 8:00 – 11:30 a.m.
Location: Hall A, Abstract:4108, Poster Board 100

Title: Detection of somatic variants in peripheral blood lymphocytes using a next generation sequencing multigene cancer panel.
Presenter: Bradford Coffee
Date: Monday, June 6, 2016, 8:00 – 11:30 a.m.
Location: Hall A, Abstract:1580, Poster Board 403

Poster Discussion Presentation


Title: Magnitude of invasive breast cancer (BC) risk associated with mutations detected by multiple-gene germline sequencing in 95,561 women.
Presenter: Michael Hall
Date: Monday, June 6, 2016, 8:00 — 11:30 a.m., Discussion 1:15 — 2:30 p.m.
Location: S404, Abstract:1512, Poster Board 335

myChoice HRD: Poster Presentation


Title: Clinical significance of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score testing in endometrial cancer patients.
Presenter: Jean Hansen
Date: Monday, June 6, 2016, 1:00 – 4:00 p.m.
Location: Hall A, Abstract: 5584, Poster Board 407

Prolaris Abstract Publication


Title: Reduction in therapeutic burden from use of CCP test in treatment decisions among newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients independent of Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Presenter: Neal Shore
Abstract: e16572

About Myriad myRisk Hereditary Cancer Testing
The Myriad myRisk Hereditary Cancer test uses an extensive number of sophisticated technologies and proprietary algorithms in an 850 step laboratory process to evaluate 25 clinically significant genes associated with eight hereditary cancer sites including: breast, colon, ovarian, endometrial, pancreatic, prostate and gastric cancers and melanoma. For more information visit: View Source

About myChoice HRD
Myriad’s myChoice HRD is the first homologous recombination deficiency test that can detect when a tumor has lost the ability to repair double-stranded DNA breaks, resulting in increased susceptibility to DNA-damaging drugs such as platinum drugs or PARP inhibitors. High myChoice HRD scores reflective of DNA repair deficiencies are prevalent in all breast cancer subtypes, ovarian and most other major cancers. In previously published data, Myriad showed that the myChoice HRD test predicted drug response to platinum therapy in certain patients with triple-negative breast and ovarian cancers. It is estimated that 1.8 million people in the United States and Europe who are diagnosed with cancers annually may be candidates for treatment with DNA-damaging agents.

Novocure Announces Presentation of Subgroup Analysis of PANOVA Data Showing Overall Survival Benefit of Tumor Treating Fields Plus Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients

On May 18, 2016 Novocure (NASDAQ: NVCR) reported that a new subgroup analysis of its ongoing phase 2 pilot PANOVA clinical trial will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (Free ASCO Whitepaper) Annual Meeting in Chicago on June 3-7, 2016, demonstrating an overall survival benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) combined with gemcitabine compared to historical controls of gemcitabine alone (Press release, NovoCure, MAY 18, 2016, View Source [SID:1234512546]).

Schedule your 30 min Free 1stOncology Demo!
Discover why more than 1,500 members use 1stOncology™ to excel in:

Early/Late Stage Pipeline Development - Target Scouting - Clinical Biomarkers - Indication Selection & Expansion - BD&L Contacts - Conference Reports - Combinatorial Drug Settings - Companion Diagnostics - Drug Repositioning - First-in-class Analysis - Competitive Analysis - Deals & Licensing

                  Schedule Your 30 min Free Demo!

Results were obtained from the first of two 20-patient cohorts. Of the 20 patients in the first cohort of the trial, 13 had distant metastases and seven had locally advanced unresectable disease. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer is a tumor that has not yet spread to distant organs, yet it cannot be removed entirely by surgery because it has grown into nearby major blood vessels. Roughly 30 percent of pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable disease, and roughly 50 percent of pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease.

PANOVA patients experienced a median progression free survival (PFS) of 8.3 months (95% Cl 4.3, 10.3), with locally advanced patients reaching a median PFS of 10.3 months (95% Cl 2.8, NA) and patients with metastatic disease reaching a median PFS of 5.7 months (95% CI 3.8 -10.3). PFS rate at six months was 56 percent. Of the 19 out of 20 evaluable tumors, 30 percent had partial response and another 30 percent had stable disease.

The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 14.9 months. Median OS was longer than 15 months in locally advanced patients with 86% of patients alive at end of follow up. Patients with metastatic disease experienced a median OS of 8.3 months (95% Cl 4.3-14.9). The one-year survival rate was 55 percent – 86 percent in locally advanced and 40 percent in metastatic disease.

"The results of this subgroup analysis are very telling, demonstrating that pancreatic cancer patients who are treated with TTFields therapy plus gemcitabine before their cancer metastasizes could have a greater chance of survival," said Dr. Eilon Kirson, Chief Science Officer and Head of Research and Development at Novocure. "We believe TTFields therapy plus gemcitabine could dramatically improve survival in advanced pancreatic cancer patients."

Novocure presented data from the first cohort of PANOVA at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper) GI in January 2016, suggesting an increase in PFS and OS for patients receiving TTFields in combination with gemcitabine compared to historical controls of gemcitabine alone. Novocure will complete enrollment for the second cohort of PANOVA this year. After obtaining data from the first cohort of PANOVA, Novocure accelerated planning for a phase 3 pivotal trial in pancreatic cancer.

"Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, and it is most often diagnosed at advanced stages, when surgery is not a curative option," said Asaf Danziger, CEO of Novocure. "Our early data in this cancer type suggest TTFields therapy could make a meaningful difference in the lives of patients with this devastating disease." Novocure will also have two e-publications featured at ASCO (Free ASCO Whitepaper)’s Annual Meeting:
The antitumor activity of alternating electric fields (TTFields) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Development of practice algorithms to guide treatment planning with TTFields for the management of glioblastoma (GBM)
During the conference, Novocure representatives will be at booth #6109.

About Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. The National Cancer Institute estimated that about 48,960 people would be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and about 40,560 people would die from the disease in 2015. Five-year survival among pancreatic cancer patients is less than 6 percent. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy is not approved for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The safety and effectiveness of TTFields therapy for pancreatic cancer has not been established.